AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,3/10
2,7 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
De uma fantasia empolgante a um caso perigoso, uma mulher casada e rica vê sua vida desmoronar após começar a ler um livro não publicado.De uma fantasia empolgante a um caso perigoso, uma mulher casada e rica vê sua vida desmoronar após começar a ler um livro não publicado.De uma fantasia empolgante a um caso perigoso, uma mulher casada e rica vê sua vida desmoronar após começar a ler um livro não publicado.
Mark Camacho
- Additional Voices
- (English version)
- (narração)
Eric Davis
- Taner
- (English version)
- (narração)
Avaliações em destaque
First let's understand the concept of Metatheatre from Wikipedia: "Metatheatre, and the closely related term metadrama, describes the aspects of a play that draw attention to its nature as drama or theatre, or to the circumstances of its performance. "Breaking the Fourth Wall" is an example of a metatheatrical device."
This film reminded me of Luigi Pirandello's 'Six Characters In Search of an Author', although it must be noted that 'Kul' is far inferior than the above mentioned, I saw an attempt to construct something akin to Pirandello's masterpiece. The characters could've been explored further especially that of the Husband, but I also understand the constraints of Netflix presentations.
I personally thought the film was decent, not good or bad but decent. I was shocked to see so many people reviewed it so badly then then again I was remembered that Pirandello's play was called "madhouse" when it was first performed in 1921. Perhaps without my prior knowledge of these I would've reacted in a similar way.
This film reminded me of Luigi Pirandello's 'Six Characters In Search of an Author', although it must be noted that 'Kul' is far inferior than the above mentioned, I saw an attempt to construct something akin to Pirandello's masterpiece. The characters could've been explored further especially that of the Husband, but I also understand the constraints of Netflix presentations.
I personally thought the film was decent, not good or bad but decent. I was shocked to see so many people reviewed it so badly then then again I was remembered that Pirandello's play was called "madhouse" when it was first performed in 1921. Perhaps without my prior knowledge of these I would've reacted in a similar way.
This film would be perfect for someone I knew a few years ago...she was in her mid-40s, had an Instagram account, did that lip smacking thing probably because she thought it was sexy, and worst of all attended Drake concerts.
Target Audience:
Sound like you?
Go click that play button!
(I'll be curious to read your review)
On a serious note, objectively aligning my mindset with the desired target audience the film does what it says on the tin. You don't watch Jason Statham movies (excluding London) for the stellar acting. You watch it because you know what to expect. On that note I'd give it a 4.
The production quality is excellent.
The lead actress did a good job.
Honestly, I'm a little baffled to the low reviews. Are we rating based on quality or our own subjective taste? If that's the case then I'd give those brilliant Pixar animations 2's all days long. Can't stand sitting through them blasted Animations with the kids, however, I recognise quality when I see it!
Not to get carried away, even in this niche this film isn't great but it certainly isn't awful.
Target Audience:
- Divorced, seperated, unhappily married
- Over 35
- Have an interest in romance novels
- Enjoy cliche Turkish dramas
Sound like you?
Go click that play button!
(I'll be curious to read your review)
On a serious note, objectively aligning my mindset with the desired target audience the film does what it says on the tin. You don't watch Jason Statham movies (excluding London) for the stellar acting. You watch it because you know what to expect. On that note I'd give it a 4.
The production quality is excellent.
The lead actress did a good job.
Honestly, I'm a little baffled to the low reviews. Are we rating based on quality or our own subjective taste? If that's the case then I'd give those brilliant Pixar animations 2's all days long. Can't stand sitting through them blasted Animations with the kids, however, I recognise quality when I see it!
Not to get carried away, even in this niche this film isn't great but it certainly isn't awful.
Congratulations to those who made such a terrible, unrealistic movie. Mehmet Günsür will be in a terrible movie in his career, it's a pity. The movie makes you say that it's a pity for all the expenses and efforts, it's as worthless as ash like its name. The only good thing about it is the beautiful images of Istanbul. The cinematographer did a good job, but the cast, script and directing can be taught as a lesson on how to make a terrible movie in schools that teach cinema. If you want to torture yourself, it can be a nice torture tool, it is a sad that something like this comes out of this geography, Turkey, which has a lot of original stories to tell.
Good director(Erdem Tepegoz), good scenarist(Erdi Isik), wonderfull cast(Funda Eryigit, Alperen Korkmaz, Mehmet Gunsur)...unfortunately the result is not satisfactory. The idea of the plot is interesting . But i think that the screenplay is written in a hurry.. needs elaboration and more toughts. On the other hand the characters are not well developed. They are unidimensional. The link with Anna Karenina is ridiculous . Laughed a lot at the final scene. We are not expecting art movies from Netflix but we still deserve better works. As i've mentioned earlier most of the latest contents of Netflix started to be below average.
Everyhing in this low budget clishé movie is overused to the point of losing all meaning.
Made me want to cancel Netflix subscription.
This cliché romance cheating wife movie relies heavily on tired tropes and predictable plot twists, failing to offer any originality or depth. The characters are one-dimensional, the dialogue feels forced, and the emotional stakes are undermined by shallow storytelling. The portrayal of infidelity lacks nuance, reducing complex human relationships to superficial melodrama. Overall, it's a forgettable and uninspired addition to the genre, offering little substance or genuine insight into the complexities of love and betrayal.
Made me want to cancel Netflix subscription.
This cliché romance cheating wife movie relies heavily on tired tropes and predictable plot twists, failing to offer any originality or depth. The characters are one-dimensional, the dialogue feels forced, and the emotional stakes are undermined by shallow storytelling. The portrayal of infidelity lacks nuance, reducing complex human relationships to superficial melodrama. Overall, it's a forgettable and uninspired addition to the genre, offering little substance or genuine insight into the complexities of love and betrayal.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Ashes
- Locações de filme
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 40 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente