AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,0/10
565
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA woman discovers her new husband wants to keep her all to himself.A woman discovers her new husband wants to keep her all to himself.A woman discovers her new husband wants to keep her all to himself.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Michelle Chin
- Reporter
- (as Michelle Bradbury)
Douglas Kidd
- Tony (the waiter)
- (as Douglas Miller)
Helen Batabyal
- Woman in Restaurant
- (não creditado)
Karl Claude
- Uniformed Cop
- (não creditado)
Sally Clelford
- Cafe Patron
- (não creditado)
Jason Daley
- Detective
- (não creditado)
Jocelyn Forgues
- Cafe Patron
- (não creditado)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
The reporter Lisa (Tracy Nelson) meets the famous writer Ty Kellington (Michael Riley) in an interview, and sooner they get married. Their common life is perfect, almost a dream, until Lisa is invited by her old friend Matt Thompson (Thomas Calabro) to work with him in a radio show. The paranoid hidden side of the personality of Ty is unfolded, showing a deranged man capable of killing and threatening the life of Lisa, her sister Beverly (Andrea Roth) and close friends. "The Perfect Husband" is a forgettable and predictable festival of clichés, a low budget movie where is possible to guess the next scene. The performance of Tracy Nelson is horrible, in the lead female role, but Michael Riley and Andrea Roth have a good acting and at least I did not sleep along this foretold plot. My vote is four.
Title (Brazil): "O Perigo Dorme ao Lado" ("The Danger Sleeps SidebySide")
Title (Brazil): "O Perigo Dorme ao Lado" ("The Danger Sleeps SidebySide")
How many times have I seen this movie. Must be 500 of them at least! Og course I have seen even worse movies but holy crap they can't make movies like they did back in the Years from ca. 80 '-97'. After that it have gone downhill. And When the actors look stupid you can't take the movie serious either. 2,5 Rating is correct after my opinion. It's like the director's today can't think anymore!! The old movies early 90's are Incredible compere to these new Life Time movies. The location,plot, camera Work and dialog and acting back then was 100 times better then these New movies today.
Lisa meets widowed author Ty Kellington and it's not long before they marry. At first, everything seems fine, but then Ty begins to resent all intrusions to their relationship and attempts to eliminate them. He's suspicious and possessive and is even unhappy about Lisa's pregnancy. When Lisa hurts her ankle during an argument, she becomes a prisoner in her own home. Ty becomes more and more controlling, unbalanced, and dangerous.
Lisa meets widowed author Ty Kellington and it's not long before they marry. At first, everything seems fine, but then Ty begins to resent all intrusions to their relationship and attempts to eliminate them. He's suspicious and possessive and is even unhappy about Lisa's pregnancy. When Lisa hurts her ankle during an argument, she becomes a prisoner in her own home. Ty becomes more and more controlling, unbalanced, and dangerous.
I really loved this movie . If you are into " controlling physco husband " movies, then this is the movie for you !
Michael Reily is excellent as the latter , played the part brilliantly , and Tracy Nelson is great as the submissive , unsuspecting wife.
I actually got a Stephen King vibe throughout !!
The whole story moves and builds at a steady pace , culminating in a tense and thrilling end !
I highly recommend this one , its a 9 rating from me !!
Michael Reily is excellent as the latter , played the part brilliantly , and Tracy Nelson is great as the submissive , unsuspecting wife.
I actually got a Stephen King vibe throughout !!
The whole story moves and builds at a steady pace , culminating in a tense and thrilling end !
I highly recommend this one , its a 9 rating from me !!
We have seen the cliché plot (woman marries perfect husband but turns out to be a psychopath) many times.
In the 70s, 80s and 90s we were inundated with this theme in the true stories category, in which the story was almost always told one-sidedly from the female perspective and in which the perpetrator was usually portrayed in a very two-dimensional way without a satisfactory backstory.
This was of course to demonize the perpetrator as much as possible and to portray the victim character as sympathetically as possible.
But why not some more backstory for the perpetrator? That could give the story a lot more depth and make for a much interesting film.
Here too it is actually very cliché. The fact that the couple gets married after 4 months does not make it much more believable.
Of course this is a 13 in a dozen thriller, but still, there were moments in the film where I thought: boy, is this all you could come up with in terms of text dialogue? Such as in the dinner scene in which TY shows up uninvited and they ask him how he comes up with his characters in his books.
Funny that Michael Riley plays this role, I had seen him play alongside Brian Dennehy in To Catch a Killer and he played really well in it, even though Dennhy was superior as gacy.
In the 70s, 80s and 90s we were inundated with this theme in the true stories category, in which the story was almost always told one-sidedly from the female perspective and in which the perpetrator was usually portrayed in a very two-dimensional way without a satisfactory backstory.
This was of course to demonize the perpetrator as much as possible and to portray the victim character as sympathetically as possible.
But why not some more backstory for the perpetrator? That could give the story a lot more depth and make for a much interesting film.
Here too it is actually very cliché. The fact that the couple gets married after 4 months does not make it much more believable.
Of course this is a 13 in a dozen thriller, but still, there were moments in the film where I thought: boy, is this all you could come up with in terms of text dialogue? Such as in the dinner scene in which TY shows up uninvited and they ask him how he comes up with his characters in his books.
Funny that Michael Riley plays this role, I had seen him play alongside Brian Dennehy in To Catch a Killer and he played really well in it, even though Dennhy was superior as gacy.
Caught this one late at night after a long day of work and couldn't sleep. This one didn't disappoint as it was slower and the spouse didn't loose his sh- until mid-way through the movie allowing for character development. Tracy Nelson is sympathetic as the ensnared wife and the husband wasn't just the one-dimensional psychopath. The actor who played him's performance was nuanced and you genuinely see that crazy-evil thing going on in his head. I'm actually going to go a step further and actually recommend this one (I don't normally do that with LMNs) but only if you have nerves of steel. The second half of the movie is very nerve-wracking and you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat when as the wife becomes injured and is seeminly rendered helpless.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen Dr. Kiley diagnoses Lisa with a fractured ankled and torn ligaments, she only uses x-rays. You cannot see ligaments on a x-ray, only bones.
- Citações
Ty Kellington: You're being very rude right now.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosA train whistle is heard near the end of the ending credits scroll.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração1 hora 34 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was O Perigo Dorme ao Lado (2004) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda