AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,3/10
14 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Em uma Terra pós-apocalíptica, um mago e seus companheiros lutam contra um mago maligno que está usando a tecnologia em sua tentativa de conquista.Em uma Terra pós-apocalíptica, um mago e seus companheiros lutam contra um mago maligno que está usando a tecnologia em sua tentativa de conquista.Em uma Terra pós-apocalíptica, um mago e seus companheiros lutam contra um mago maligno que está usando a tecnologia em sua tentativa de conquista.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 3 indicações no total
Jesse Welles
- Elinore
- (narração)
Richard Romanus
- Weehawk
- (narração)
David Proval
- Peace
- (narração)
Jim Connell
- President
- (narração)
- (as James Connell)
Steve Gravers
- Blackwolf
- (narração)
Barbara Sloane
- Fairy
- (narração)
Angelo Grisanti
- Frog
- (narração)
Hyman Wien
- Priest
- (narração)
Christopher Tayback
- Peewhittle
- (narração)
Mark Hamill
- Sean
- (narração)
- (as Mark Hamil)
Peter Hobbs
- General
- (narração)
Tina Romanus
- Prostitute
- (narração)
- (as Tina Bowman)
Susan Anton
- Princess Elinore
- (canto)
- (não creditado)
- …
Liz Bakshi
- Fairy Mother
- (narração)
- (não creditado)
Ralph Bakshi
- Fritz
- (narração)
- (não creditado)
- …
Victoria Bakshi
- Fairy Girl
- (narração)
- (não creditado)
Charles Gordone
- Alfie
- (narração)
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
I have come across who like this movie and some that don't so much, sometimes downright hate it even. As for me, I don't love or dislike Wizards. It is certainly an interesting movie, and is certainly better than Cool World, but as far as Bakshi's movies go I do much prefer Heavy Traffic and American Pop. Wizards' flaws have been covered a number of times in previous reviews, but I do share my agreement with some that have been brought up. The dialogue I don't think has been a general strength in Bakshi's movies but I did find it very corny here. The soundtrack also felt a little cheesy and perhaps too 70s, and the pacing is awkward, often feeling sluggish. I had mixed feelings on the story, it was a great idea and while simple was generally interesting and engaged me once I got over its strangeness. But I did have issues with the narration; not since Don Bluth's Rock a Doodle have I seen an animated movie with such an (I feel) unnecessary overuse of narration. However, the film does look wonderful, the characters do look too cartoony but I liked their rough-around-the-edges charm and the backgrounds and colours are stylish and beautiful. The characters while on the stereotypical side are at least likable and engaging, I did find myself rooting for Avatar. The voice acting is solid on the whole. Overall, decent film and underrated but too flawed for me to consider it a masterpiece. 6/10 Bethany Cox
One thing i'll say for Ralph Bakshi's cult classic "Wizards": Its got brains. The whole political allegory coupled with a cautionary tale about fascism, propaganda and the amorality of technology really worked here. Rarely do you get this sort of thing in animated movies back in the 70s. The fact that it is coupled with an overall "fairy tale-ish" look that seems more at home among those cheap "ages 3 to 8" cartoons makes the viewing experience a very unique one.
It really is too bad that so much time and effort went into developing the whole underlying political themes that nothing much else went into the aspects of the film that would matter to most people, aka the dialog and the animation itself.
Though the story is simple enough to follow, the characters come across as just plain boring thanks to, IMO, horribly written lines and sub-par acting. Aside from Blackwolf the evil wizard and his good brother wizard Avatar, the rest of the characters sound like they are reading off a bedtime storybook and not engaging in dialog. Emoting comes in two extremes; either the actors ham up their parts to the point of annoyance, or there is hardly a hint of emotion behind the voices. Dialogue style also seems to inconsistently switch between an archaic "Shakespeare play" style (common in most fairy tale animated movies) and a typical "everyman" speaking style (how me and my neighbor would talk), sometimes within the same scene and by the same character.
I found it really difficult to get emotionally involved in the show. All of them have a stylized and even marginally grotesque look to them. Even the "good guys" like the elves have yellow eyes and sharp teeth; and the sub-standard animation did not help either. The animation is about as bad a cheap Flintstones holiday special with numerous animation short cuts like looping motion, re-used stock footage and out of sync sound effects. A good deal of rotoscoping was thrown in and I usually have no problems with that, Except in this case, the rotoscoped images were not "drawn over". There was no attempt to make the rotoscoped images blend with the style of the animation which led to a very disjointed feel during the battle scenes. The only time this jarring clash of animation styles actually worked was during the final climatic battle where the surreal images and the hauntingly dark rotoscoped footage effectively conveyed the hectic confusion of a real battlefield.(though i question the choice of retro jazzy background music)
To be honest, I found myself rooting most for Blackwolf's green gas-masked soldiers. ("THEY KILLED FRITZ!!"). Their little moments in the film really managed to get a chuckle out of me; they had a certain loony toons-like charm about them.
With a larger budget and a more experienced production team, Wizards could have been an avant garde work of art that entertains as well as conveys a message. What I discovered was an averagely animated film that does convey a message but falls short in the "entertainment" aspect. A couple of witty one liners here and there and some lush painted backgrounds is not enough to save this film from its numerous flaws.
By today's standards, Wizards will hardly be able to garner a mainstream following, nor would it impress the younger viewers anytime soon. It pains me to say this, but Wizards may forever remain as merely a cult classic curiosity of the 70s.
It really is too bad that so much time and effort went into developing the whole underlying political themes that nothing much else went into the aspects of the film that would matter to most people, aka the dialog and the animation itself.
Though the story is simple enough to follow, the characters come across as just plain boring thanks to, IMO, horribly written lines and sub-par acting. Aside from Blackwolf the evil wizard and his good brother wizard Avatar, the rest of the characters sound like they are reading off a bedtime storybook and not engaging in dialog. Emoting comes in two extremes; either the actors ham up their parts to the point of annoyance, or there is hardly a hint of emotion behind the voices. Dialogue style also seems to inconsistently switch between an archaic "Shakespeare play" style (common in most fairy tale animated movies) and a typical "everyman" speaking style (how me and my neighbor would talk), sometimes within the same scene and by the same character.
I found it really difficult to get emotionally involved in the show. All of them have a stylized and even marginally grotesque look to them. Even the "good guys" like the elves have yellow eyes and sharp teeth; and the sub-standard animation did not help either. The animation is about as bad a cheap Flintstones holiday special with numerous animation short cuts like looping motion, re-used stock footage and out of sync sound effects. A good deal of rotoscoping was thrown in and I usually have no problems with that, Except in this case, the rotoscoped images were not "drawn over". There was no attempt to make the rotoscoped images blend with the style of the animation which led to a very disjointed feel during the battle scenes. The only time this jarring clash of animation styles actually worked was during the final climatic battle where the surreal images and the hauntingly dark rotoscoped footage effectively conveyed the hectic confusion of a real battlefield.(though i question the choice of retro jazzy background music)
To be honest, I found myself rooting most for Blackwolf's green gas-masked soldiers. ("THEY KILLED FRITZ!!"). Their little moments in the film really managed to get a chuckle out of me; they had a certain loony toons-like charm about them.
With a larger budget and a more experienced production team, Wizards could have been an avant garde work of art that entertains as well as conveys a message. What I discovered was an averagely animated film that does convey a message but falls short in the "entertainment" aspect. A couple of witty one liners here and there and some lush painted backgrounds is not enough to save this film from its numerous flaws.
By today's standards, Wizards will hardly be able to garner a mainstream following, nor would it impress the younger viewers anytime soon. It pains me to say this, but Wizards may forever remain as merely a cult classic curiosity of the 70s.
This cartoon was one of those in the seventies when animation was almost dead. A few folks revived it with movies like Fritz the Cat, Lord of the Rings, Fire and Ice and Wizards. Although Wizards didn't do well during the prime time, it rocked as a midnight movie.
But, even with the simple plot, engaging characters and sporadic humor, one gets the impression that this movie was not well-planned. There is conventional animation, rotoscoping and overexposed film sometimes being used on the same screen. It also seems that they ran out of money and had to resort to stills with a narrator (nice voice)...
You'd think that this would make the movie worse; however, it gives the movie a charm that a slicker production wouldn't have...
But, even with the simple plot, engaging characters and sporadic humor, one gets the impression that this movie was not well-planned. There is conventional animation, rotoscoping and overexposed film sometimes being used on the same screen. It also seems that they ran out of money and had to resort to stills with a narrator (nice voice)...
You'd think that this would make the movie worse; however, it gives the movie a charm that a slicker production wouldn't have...
This film was Bakshi's test-run, of sorts, for his upcoming version of 'Lord of the Rings'. Supposedly he originally wanted to make a fantasy based on the Holocaust, but settled for a more traditional fantasy. The story deals with wizards and elves in the distant future who dig up long-forgotten Nazi propaganda films and old war machinery, which are used by evil creatures to try and conquer the good creatures. The demons and evil creatures are obviously symbols of Nazis while the elves (with one being the voice of a young Mark Hamill) representing the Jews. It's almost disturbing at times watching old WWII war movie footage with German soldiers fighting alongside animated demons against psychedelic-colored backgrounds. The film is worth viewing for the still-drawings alone that appear throughout the film, with excellent artwork by Michael Ploog. The animation doesn't strive for realism (why bother, since Rotoscoping is so heavily used) but captures the dynamic motion depicted in comic book art. Very good. Highly recommended.
When one imagines wizards, usually knights, mounts, damsels, and dragons come to mind almost exclusively. But would one think of the haunting memories of the holocaust, or any actions Hitler's Nazi Regime took whenever magic-wielding wizards are mentioned? Not likely.
Bakshi's able to pit the essence of fantasy against the monstrosity of an ever-growing being we call "technology." The animation is simple (albeit complex and interesting at times) yet unique, the characters are conflicted and well-developed, and the twisted, somewhat random humor adds a twist of reality in a seemingly hopeless world. Definitely a movie to watch and a movie to criticize in its own rite.
Bakshi's able to pit the essence of fantasy against the monstrosity of an ever-growing being we call "technology." The animation is simple (albeit complex and interesting at times) yet unique, the characters are conflicted and well-developed, and the twisted, somewhat random humor adds a twist of reality in a seemingly hopeless world. Definitely a movie to watch and a movie to criticize in its own rite.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe horse-like animals had two feet instead of four because it was easier and cheaper to animate.
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen Avatar is telling the president about his brother, the narrator says that Blackwolf has been studying black magic for 5,000 years. But when Blackwolf is introduced, it says that the story takes place 3,000 years later.
- Versões alternativasOn April 30th, 2005, as part of the Ralph Bakshi retrospective at the Egyptian Theatre in Hollywood, Bakshi's personal print of the film was shown, which was missing two pieces of narration:
- Susan Tyrrell does not read the opening shot's storybook title in her narration voice-over. In this print, the film's narration starts with "The world blew up in a thousand atomic fireballs...," in the next shot.
- The character of Nekron 99's (AKA Peace's) narrated introduction was also missing from the print.
- ConexõesEdited from Triunfo da Vontade (1935)
- Trilhas sonorasOnly Time Will Tell
Performed by Susan Anton
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Wizards?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 1.200.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração1 hora 22 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente