AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,6/10
3,2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Uma equipe jurídica lida com casos que envolvem condenações injustas.Uma equipe jurídica lida com casos que envolvem condenações injustas.Uma equipe jurídica lida com casos que envolvem condenações injustas.
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
Of the 3 new series I've watched in the last few days, this got my attention. Solid cast, tight script with a lot of moving parts, and a wealth of material to explore in future installments. I'm anxious to check out the next few episodes to see if they can sustain the same level of interest.
I like it so far I hope it gets a chance to develop into something There are a lot of good story lines here to work with and give the actors a chance to settle in and there could be something great here but just 5 episodes I hope it gets a chance I have got to ep 9 and yes could be better but is ok I just think hope she puts the bad guy down a little AND for all who think it is political shut up it is a show go back to FB and spout off
Injustice Defense Group in Chicago is a legal firm led by Madeline Scott (Rachelle Lefevre) who was herself falsely imprisoned. Her law partner Easy Boudreau (Russell Hornsby) exonerated her and her troubled brother Levi from their murder convictions. Ambitious D.A. Gore Bellows (Kelsey Grammer) was the prosecutor and is running for Attorney General on his way to the Governorship. He battles Madeline in court as more prisoners are exonerated. Bodie Quick (Vincent Kartheiser) is the investigator and Violet Bell (Nikki M. James) is the assistant/podcaster.
The show pushes the agenda way too hard. Stylistically, the podcast is too preachy. Substantively, the cases should be less black and white. The show needs finesse. The main saving grace is Grammer. He delivers evil with a small e. I like that it's more ambition and arrogance rather than viciousness. The Madeline side is fine but it could do with more questions about her actual guilt. Her innocence is so absolute so that it lacks the tension of a mystery. Even the reveal of the killer is obvious from five episodes away. There is no subtlety in the writing at all. Otherwise, it's compelling enough until the last episode.
The show pushes the agenda way too hard. Stylistically, the podcast is too preachy. Substantively, the cases should be less black and white. The show needs finesse. The main saving grace is Grammer. He delivers evil with a small e. I like that it's more ambition and arrogance rather than viciousness. The Madeline side is fine but it could do with more questions about her actual guilt. Her innocence is so absolute so that it lacks the tension of a mystery. Even the reveal of the killer is obvious from five episodes away. There is no subtlety in the writing at all. Otherwise, it's compelling enough until the last episode.
Lots of trolling here. Only one episode and people can write it off so quick. Most shows take a few episodes before they get good. All of the shows out about law have been about finding people guilty. Its rare to have a show be based off of innocent people. It brings out the truth in our very faulty justice department. Trying to find the faults in the acting as some trollers here have mentioned, but i can't find the bad acting they are referring to. At least not the main characters. Don't listen to the 1 -5 star raters here. Take a chance and watch..and just like most shows, keep watching and it will get better and better. So far, i like it...
The show is good not great, but it is a TV show, it is there for entertainment and for that it does it's job. I am so glad I don't live in America where every thing is analysed for political reasons and nothing is taken on face value, must be a really tough way to live your life.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesTodas as entradas contêm spoilers
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does Proven Innocent have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente