Hitler's Circle of Evil

This excellent historian-narrated docu-drama retells the history of the making of the Nazi party and the Third Reich by focusing on the interplay of the main characters at the center of it all: Hitler and his inner circle of Nazi leaders. For me, the series rates very highly among many others in the genre for the seamless use of archival photos and footage, rich and convincing dramatization, and constant narrative driven commentary by numerous historians. The use of music to heighten the drama is not too intrusive, and is actually effective. One can forgive the British historians for their obvious bias in describing Hitler and his henchmen as "evil" and "deranged" because they were! Yet, it is important to take in the lessons the narrative also presents (with less obvious emotional force) in how Germany's economic ruin after WWI and the colonial ambitions of other European powers at that time abetted the drive toward the rabid nationalism that Hitler promoted... lessons that America had taken in far better than Britain and other Allies following WWII with the brilliant Marshall Plan. Back to this production, though: Even if you are well familiar with the history of the Nazi party, Hitler's Circle of Evil is fascinating and even entertaining viewing.

I find the suggestions in some of the reviews that the Nazis were NOT irrational disturbing. There is one major argument to be made *for* their rationality: that the objectives of WWII were the same as WWI, and no one calls Kaiser and his crew irrational or nuts. On the other hand the military campaigns, in spite of the success against Poland and France, were nuts, as was the huge diversion of resources to the holocaust. Hitler's chief engineer Fritz Todt told him the Germans were going to lose in October 1941 and that he should negotiate a German withdrawal with Stalin. (whoops! sorry bout that!) But, even so, the series is explicit about the talents of some of these men: Goebbels was a capable orator, Goring seemed to have a better appreciation of grand strategy than most of the other party luminaries, Himmler had strong bureaucratic and organizational skills. They are really depicted as rational agents in thrall to an irrational ideology.

But what about the series? It is one of many possible ways to get into the vast and complicated topic that is WWII. The focus on domestic politics leaves out some important issues, such as the Soviet-German pact to divide Poland, but this series is not really about "total context." This series is about the personalities of the Nazi party. It helps you distinguish who was who, Goring from Goebbels, Himmler from Heydrich, Hesse, and so on. You don't get the generals. Just the major Nazi party figures.

If you watch this series with an extra resource, and every now and then pause the presentation to look up this or that, you will find it a useful way to get the feel of the Third Reich's major politicians. If you want a printed resource try the Oxford (single volume) encyclopedia of WWII. Or alternatively, take the time to use your tablet or phone to look up some of the topics that interest you on Wikipedia.

Almost any one of the WWII documentaries is *better*. For example, the famous "World at War" series from the 1970s. However, in that series, as you zip around battles and generals and politicians on both sides of the Atlantic and in Asia, you lose sight of the inner circle. The narrow focus of this series, in spite of its repetitive reality-show-ish format, is a very good first step into learning about the war and why these guys were hanged at Nuremberg (those that they could round up). As is often the case for such a complicated topic, every now and then something drops that I hadn't thought of, even though I have read a lot about WWII. For example, the series' argument that the plan to deport the Jews to Madagascar had to be shelved because the Germans lost the Battle of Britain (thus leaving the British with supremacy on the seas) was interesting. Very likely the Nazis would have gone ahead with extermination anyhow, but there are interconnections that I haven't made before. That Heydrich chaired the Wannsee conference was something else that had slipped my attention, even though I knew about the Wannsee conference. Goring's control of Prussia and its police/domestic espionage operation were news to me. The role of Martin Borman as a puppet master is also highlighted by the series, even though many treatments of the war tend to keep him in the background.

So all in all there's some good material in here. If this were the Michelin Guide I would give it a one star meaning "worth the trip." So I think this offers something to the WWII buff and it is also an interesting side trip if you find your regular viewing derailed by erratic shooting schedules. My main current series (such as Expanse, Babylon Berlin, and Game of Thrones) are all in suspension. If you like history and want to stream something that has a relatively short span from beginning to end this is a good option. The Germans lose WWII. Is that a spoiler?

I just read Erik Larson's book "In the garden of beasts". The book tells you the story of William E. Dodd, american ambassador in Berlin from 1933 to 1937. Recommended! Combined with this series, it gives you a great view on what happened in Germany during that period, and we can only wonder why USA, GB and France didn't do something about it much earlier. They absolutely underestimated the situation. Hitler just wanted time to build his army.

William E. Dodd foresaw all this, and allthough he was criticized by many during that time because of what he said and wrote about what he thought would happen, he was later seen as a prophet they all should have listened to.

"Hitler's circle of evil" is an excellent documentary!

This is a documentary series that sheds a light on how the Nazis became the power and force and the leaders in Germany before the second World War. It also shines a light on how they feel apart during and espcially toward the end of that war. This is really well made and I guess you can have a problem with the show having actors reanacting certain situations, but this is the medium film and visual pointers are what this is about.

Of course it also uses old material wherever there is some available. It is really well mixed and there is gravitas to it all. It is narrated of course and very easy to follow. I guess if you are not too much into book reading or if you want to have it served to you visually (additionally to books), this is as good as it gets. The single episodes have an arc and a story they sort of finish within the whole arc and storyline, so you don't have to worry about having to binge watch it in one day. Although at around 50-60 minutes an episode you could do that on a weekend or some other free days you have at hand. It may also be something you can watch with kids and both can learn from this experience

This is a very good series, and very well presented. Shines a light on the inner circle of the mafia-like organization that was the Nazi regime and the inner fights between the senior members. Very interesting to see how these horrible people fought each other, hungry for power and/or survival, and still the show constantly reminds the viewer that these interesting characters, were also the monsters responsible for some of the worst crimes of the 20th century.

Only flaw I think is that it is a bit repetitive sometimes, since we have to be constantly reminded who was who. It is understandable of course that not everyone is a history buff who would always recognize historical figures, so that is excepted.

In general is a very good documentary series, highly recommended.