Vozes da Segunda Guerra
Título original: World War II: From the Frontlines
Com imagens de arquivo vividamente aprimoradas e vozes de todos os lados do conflito, esta série documental faz uma releitura inédita da Segunda Guerra Mundial.Com imagens de arquivo vividamente aprimoradas e vozes de todos os lados do conflito, esta série documental faz uma releitura inédita da Segunda Guerra Mundial.Com imagens de arquivo vividamente aprimoradas e vozes de todos os lados do conflito, esta série documental faz uma releitura inédita da Segunda Guerra Mundial.
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 1 indicação no total
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
Most of the negative reviews have mistakenly thought something as complex as world war 2 can be covered in 6 episodes. They seem to compare this to The World at War which is detailed and 26 episodes long. This is 6. It's emotive with the interviews of people who experienced the war and the black and white footage restored with color adds to that emotion. Some complain of the narration. It's no Laurence Olivier. I would say to those who have marked it low, manage your expectations of what can be showed and explored in 6 episodes of a Netflix documentary for a war spanning years. I don't think the intention was to condense the accuracy of The World at War into 6 episodes.
Basic and inaccurate Netflix series, which hides historical facts of great importance. Its greatest merit is the sound and colorization of scenes. There is a vast amount of filmed material presented here and, therefore, it was worth watching this series. In historical terms, there is a minimalism in information that is very uncomfortable. Little is said (or not even said at all) about the infamous agreement between Stalin and Hitler, the non-aggression pact. There is no mention of the siege of Leningrad. Another inaccurate fact is the terrible situation in which Great Britain found itself at a certain point, alone fighting against Hitler. It is unacceptable not to highlight this fact and this great courage to continue fighting. The definitive documentary of the Second World War already exists. It's French and called Apocalypse and was produced in 2009.
Some of the colourised film was interesting, but the thread seemed to double back on itself from time to time. The narrative was thin and delivered very poorly. It comes from the mouth of someone whose second language is English and who suffers from seeming not to have a first one. The Luftwaffe was mispronounced, as was the Third "Rike". Surely, if you are going to narrate a programme, you should find out how to pronounce the words you are going to utter? I also noticed such beauties as "Nawf Africah"; "in the middoow"; "forcin' the British out" and many other examples of poor English. The narrator sounds as if he is either foreign, or from some inner-city estate near London. Why not use someone British with clear enunciation to do the commentary, like Robert Powell? As it is the commentary was a constant irritant. I'd do it myself, if it comes down to it. I've done it before.
What I have seen is superficial, incorrect and minimises the people who prevented Hitler winning, which is us British. Why, they have a former Luftwaffe pilot telling us that German pilots at the Battle of Britain were better than the British! Really? How come we won, then? Inclusion of that opinion was singularly pointless, as was a comment by a former German soldier about the racial inferiority of the Russians. This was not stated as a historic opinion, by the way. The focus on the Nazis and race is not the point of the programme, surely? The main point should be on what the War was about: battlefields; victories; defeats; the order of battle; conquest and so forth. The programme is called "World War II: From the Frontlines", after all. There is no analysis of why there was a war at all, which is central to the whole thing and should have been the starting point. Otherwise, it suggests that Germany (or Hitler) just thought a war sounded like a fun idea and would let him be driven around in front of adoring crowds, sticking his arm out. There is no contrary opinion to the German idea expressed in the programme that the Poles were asking for it and were going to get it. No, they weren't. There was a fake attack on a German radio station used as an excuse to invade Poland. No mention was made of that.
There is no mention of Italy getting pasted by the Greeks and how Hitler had to send troops in support to conquer Greece (or about British support of the Greeks), which meant taking seasoned divisions out of the attack on Russia. That was important. No mention of the Soviets' criminal act in also attacking Poland in 1939, along with the Germans. There is the constant talk of "Nazis", as if there was a nation called "the Nazis". It was a war against Germany and on VE Day, in Trafalgar Square, it was made abundantly clear that it was victory over Germany.
Netflix, if you are going to make a programme about history, then get your act together and don't try to rubbish the guys who kept fighting when everyone else had been conquered, were neutral, or allied to Germany. Those guys were the British. All America did was to sell us weapons and let us do the fighting. Americans wanted no part in the War, thank you very much. Canada gave us food without charge and when Europe was invaded on D Day, the majority of troops involved were British and Canadian, not American.
What I have seen is superficial, incorrect and minimises the people who prevented Hitler winning, which is us British. Why, they have a former Luftwaffe pilot telling us that German pilots at the Battle of Britain were better than the British! Really? How come we won, then? Inclusion of that opinion was singularly pointless, as was a comment by a former German soldier about the racial inferiority of the Russians. This was not stated as a historic opinion, by the way. The focus on the Nazis and race is not the point of the programme, surely? The main point should be on what the War was about: battlefields; victories; defeats; the order of battle; conquest and so forth. The programme is called "World War II: From the Frontlines", after all. There is no analysis of why there was a war at all, which is central to the whole thing and should have been the starting point. Otherwise, it suggests that Germany (or Hitler) just thought a war sounded like a fun idea and would let him be driven around in front of adoring crowds, sticking his arm out. There is no contrary opinion to the German idea expressed in the programme that the Poles were asking for it and were going to get it. No, they weren't. There was a fake attack on a German radio station used as an excuse to invade Poland. No mention was made of that.
There is no mention of Italy getting pasted by the Greeks and how Hitler had to send troops in support to conquer Greece (or about British support of the Greeks), which meant taking seasoned divisions out of the attack on Russia. That was important. No mention of the Soviets' criminal act in also attacking Poland in 1939, along with the Germans. There is the constant talk of "Nazis", as if there was a nation called "the Nazis". It was a war against Germany and on VE Day, in Trafalgar Square, it was made abundantly clear that it was victory over Germany.
Netflix, if you are going to make a programme about history, then get your act together and don't try to rubbish the guys who kept fighting when everyone else had been conquered, were neutral, or allied to Germany. Those guys were the British. All America did was to sell us weapons and let us do the fighting. Americans wanted no part in the War, thank you very much. Canada gave us food without charge and when Europe was invaded on D Day, the majority of troops involved were British and Canadian, not American.
I have watched a great many documentary series on WW2 & also read a great deal on the subject. Far from being an expert on the matter I do however enjoy watching new material so thought I'd give this long awaited series a try.
The colourisation is pretty well done. It does look a bit off sometimes but generally it holds up nicely. Much of the footage you may well have seen before but it's all knitted together extremely well and while not exactly on the epic scale of World At War it does cover the basics quite well. That being said there are a few historical inaccuracys that don't detract from the overall retelling of such a monumental period in our history.
This isn't a "deep dive" into the causes and consequences of the war - it's far too short to do that. It is a good overview of some of the key moments of the war retold by some of the people who were there. Some of these survivors stories are utterly heartbreaking, particularly the young Jewish girl who survived a Nazi labour camp.
Now let's talk about the elephant in the room!!! You may well have read a number of reviews on here criticising the choice and style of the narrator. In my opinion John Boyega does a fine job with his succinct and matter of fact style. Ok so it's not Sir Lawrence Olivier but then who is? The script is straight forward and his delivery is perfectly ok. It certainly doesn't spoil it for me and some reviewers would do better to examine their own shortcomings based upon some of their comments.
If you like WW2 documentaries that aren't too "deep" and tell the tale that needed telling then give this a watch. If you want to know every tiny historic detail then watch the World At War. 👍
The colourisation is pretty well done. It does look a bit off sometimes but generally it holds up nicely. Much of the footage you may well have seen before but it's all knitted together extremely well and while not exactly on the epic scale of World At War it does cover the basics quite well. That being said there are a few historical inaccuracys that don't detract from the overall retelling of such a monumental period in our history.
This isn't a "deep dive" into the causes and consequences of the war - it's far too short to do that. It is a good overview of some of the key moments of the war retold by some of the people who were there. Some of these survivors stories are utterly heartbreaking, particularly the young Jewish girl who survived a Nazi labour camp.
Now let's talk about the elephant in the room!!! You may well have read a number of reviews on here criticising the choice and style of the narrator. In my opinion John Boyega does a fine job with his succinct and matter of fact style. Ok so it's not Sir Lawrence Olivier but then who is? The script is straight forward and his delivery is perfectly ok. It certainly doesn't spoil it for me and some reviewers would do better to examine their own shortcomings based upon some of their comments.
If you like WW2 documentaries that aren't too "deep" and tell the tale that needed telling then give this a watch. If you want to know every tiny historic detail then watch the World At War. 👍
I didn't know what to expect when I started watching this. Now that I have finished, I can say that the video has been beautifully restored and colorized. This is perhaps some of the best WW2 video I've ever seen. That's probably my favorite part of the series.
John Boyega does a good job with the narration, but unfortunately there were a lot of inaccuracies in the storytelling itself. I wouldn't watch this series in a classroom setting.
One thing that really bothered me is how the entire series glosses over Japanese atrocities, especially in China and Korea. I don't recall anything being mentioned. The Japanese killed far more people than the Germans, but a huge segment of the video covers the genocide of the Jews, which is important, but nothing about the rape of Nanking.
I give this a six out of 10.
John Boyega does a good job with the narration, but unfortunately there were a lot of inaccuracies in the storytelling itself. I wouldn't watch this series in a classroom setting.
One thing that really bothered me is how the entire series glosses over Japanese atrocities, especially in China and Korea. I don't recall anything being mentioned. The Japanese killed far more people than the Germans, but a huge segment of the video covers the genocide of the Jews, which is important, but nothing about the rape of Nanking.
I give this a six out of 10.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- World War II: From the Frontlines
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração49 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 16:9 HD
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Vozes da Segunda Guerra (2023)?
Responda