Scandalo premeditato

'Design for Scandal' did sound quite interesting and had potential to be great. The story was a nice idea, giving the impression that the film would be enjoyable even if there was the possibility of it being not particularly plausible. Rosalind Russell and Walter Pidgeon, heading a talented cast, showed themselves to be great in other things and had a lot of appeal to them. Norman Taurog was not the most consistent or greatest of directors, but some of his work has not been bad at all.

My thoughts on 'Design for Scandal' when seeing it was that it was a decent and enjoyable film with a good deal to like about it. Albeit also a bit disappointing and not one of the best representations of particularly an against-type Pidgeon, with the big amount of potential it had it did have a lot of room to be much better than it turned out to be. It is definitely worth a viewing but it is not one of those watch it over and over films, more a film to see once or twice.

As said, there is a good deal to like. The production values are glossy but in a way that is nostalgic and quite sumptuous. Taurog directs at a brisk pace, everything moving along crisply with little signs of letting up.

The script deftly balances romance and comedy. There is some clever witty dialogue that is genuinely funny in a gentle way without being over-engineered, the interplay between Russell does sparkle at its best. The romance is frothy but also sweet and charming. Russell is in a role that suits her to the ground and she does fabulously at being icy and sophisticated with great comic timing. The supporting cast are solid generally, Edward Arnold being a standout.

Pidgeon however disappoints. It was great that he tried to do something different to his usual roles at this point, but he seemed ill at ease with the comic timing not coming naturally to him and the role would have benefitted from being handled with a much lighter touch, here played too heavily and seriously. The characters have little depth to them and are little more than stereotypes that don't always add very much, wouldn't have said no to Jean Rogers being given more to do.

Was also not all that taken with the long tangled string of cliches story, which did tend to be somewhat far-fetched to credibility-straining effect (even when taking the film for what it's meant to be and trying to not expect too much from) and not always focused, the cliches mounting all the time with so much here having been done before and much better. While the pace has a lot of energy the film loses steam towards the end in momentum and focus, and as an overall whole the film is quite ordinary. Pleasant enough but part of me wanted to connect with it much more and wanted it to do much more with its material, done competently more often than not but with not much imagination.

In conclusion, enjoyable if a bit underwhelming. With more imagination and a better male lead (others have mentioned Cary Grant and he definitely would have been a much better choice) it would have been a lot better than it turned out. Worth seeing though to see Russell in her last film she made when under her MGM contract, another interest point. 6/10

(There may be Spoilers) Zany and sophisticated 1941 screwball comedy that has big city newspaper mogul J.M "Cuddle Baby" Bair, Edward Arnold, enlisting his former ace reporter "Smilin Jeff" Sherman, Walter Pigeon, to do a job for him. "Cuddle Baby" wants Jeff to get the goods on the Judge who just threw the book on him giving his gold digging 22 year former party girl wife Adele, Mary Beth Bowman, a $250,000.00 settlement in his divorce suite.

J.M feeling like a fool to be taken to the cleaners by Judge Cornelia Porter, Rosalind Russell, tries to get her transfered out of her job presiding over family matters in divorce court, so his appeal against her decision would be handled by a judge that he can buy off. J.M then find out that she's just been elected to a six year term and has an impeccable record as a jurist. Jeff comes up with this scheme to get Judge Porter involved in a love triangle with him being the effected party who's affections are stolen from his future wife Dotty, Jean Rogers, by the Family Courts straight as a arrow Judge Cornelia Porter.

working all the angles Jeff finds out that the Judge is an armature sculpture and artist. Finding she's going to the Cape Cod artist colony to spend the summer Jeff get's a local sculpture from there Alexander Roaul, Leon Belasco, a job back in NYC to paint the JM Blair Building as Jeff moves into his studio and in on Judge Porter trying to impress her with his, really Raouls, art works.

Jeff at first trying to entrap Judge Porter by romancing her starts to fall in love with the judge. Soon he scuttles his plans that he concocted with both Dotty and his boss J.M Blair. J.M is outraged with Jeff for leaving him out in the cold and having his "fiancé" and "future wife" Dotty stick "Cuddle Baby" Blair with a $5,000.00 tab, plus all the furs and jewelry she could buy with his checkbook, to go along with Jeff's insane scheme.

With the case now going to court Blair knows that he'll lose, again, in the courts when the "other woman" in Jeff's life Judge Porter takes the stand. Jeff instead of accusing her of destroying his "marraige", that's still some two months away, with Dotty admits that he's in love with Judge Porter and thus has the entire case against her thrown out with now "Cuddle Baby" Blair, as well as Jeff, facing time behind bars for trying to frame the good and incorruptible Judge Porter.

While all this is going on Blair came to an agreement with his former wife Adele to drop her divorce settlement against him for a lump sum of $150,000.00 saving him almost $100,000.00 in divorce payments. Later Blair find out to his shock and surprise that she was to marry a rich old oil geezer, John D. Rockerfeller Jr?, the next day after she already cashed his check! If Blair waited one more day his divorce payments would have been immediately halted since she was to be married and wouldn't be entitled to them!

Judge Porter, or Cornelia, finally realizes that she's in love with the buffoonish but handsome Jeff Sherman forgets all his zany antics and tricks that he played on her by now knowing that his heart not his brain was in the right place but not always at the right time.

ROSALIND RUSSELL plays another one of her working woman roles as a divorce court judge playing a tricky game of wits with her male sparring partner WALTER PIDGEON.

He's a newspaper man who makes a deal with EDWARD ARNOLD to get the female judge (Russell) off her high pedestal so that she loses her job and he can save his grateful boss from having to pay high alimony. It's strictly cornball comedy/romance with neither star having material worthy of their star status.

It's second rate as romantic comedy and nothing--not even the competent supporting cast--can do much to raise it above the ordinary level. The script is a virtual hodge-podge of clichés, the sort of film Russell found herself typecast in year after year during the '40s.

LEE BOWMAN has another one of his thankless second string roles, MARY BETH HUGHES pouts prettily and JEAN ROGERS is merely decorative as a scheming femme fatale.

It's all pretty artificial but it passes the time on a dull afternoon.

DESIGN FOR SCANDAL (1941) Walter Pidgeon, Rosalind Russell Lively Script. Pidgeon orchestrates a scandal to help his boss get even with a judge (Russell) for a ruling in a divorce case. Pidgeon, a fixer/reporter (more like an experienced con-man) is an amoral opportunist. Russell, the judge, is cold and emotionally walled-off from the world as Pidgeon tries to seduce and compromise her.

In my opinion Pidgeon deserved to be indicted despite how glib and affable he was.

Pidgeon's performance is adequate, he's likable as always. Russell is also adequate and beautiful. But I was distanced from immersion into the story by both of their slightly wooden line delivery. I kept getting the sense they were speaking lines, acting. The script was snappy, maybe that was the problem? Too snappy for ordinary people to be saying.

I think that's one of the problems with these movies from the 40's that have such great writing. It undermines the credibility of our character identification. Who speaks like that? Who is that smart, that quick? Yet it's the same thing we enjoy so much, the thing that makes such movies rise above the rest.

So, the answer is to have characters that the audience can believe are smart enough to be delivering such quick-witted comebacks.

Also, the deliveries from the two lead characters here sounded a bit overly rehearsed.

I liked this movie from the start and as it developed but drifted away emotionally during the last act.

Lots of wonderful supporting cast including the great (and aging) Edward Arnold, the ubiquitous Guy Kibbee, and Leon Belasco (playing a sculptor).

Walter Pidgeon is a reporter who agrees to do some dirty work for his boss in "Design for Scandal," also starring Rosalind Russell and Edward Arnold.

After Arnold takes a beating in his divorce case, presided over by Russell, Pidgeon offers to help him out in return for getting his job back (when he thought he was going to die, he told off the boss - always a mistake).

His assignment is to devise a scandal involving the judge so that his boss can have her removed from the bench. Pigeon follows the lady on her vacation and makes his play, enlisting the help of his girlfriend to build an alienation of affections case.

This is a very mild comedy, highly predictable, and this type of role wasn't Pidgeon's forte. He's quite handsome in the role, but the part called for someone like Cary Grant, Errol Flynn, Clark Gable - an attractive, fast-talking rogue.

Russell, like Celeste Holm and sometimes Katharine Hepburn, played these strong career women since her beauty was not conventional. She's very good, but the theme is always the same, isn't it - a successful career is fine but you're deluding yourself.

What you really want to do is take off those tailored suits and get a man - because being a smart and successful woman will never win you anything important.

It all gets a little tired, but it does give me some insight into why my mother turned out the way she did.