अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंIn Tijuana, a brave Mexican newspaper editor tries to expose the mob and the local official corruption at his own risk.In Tijuana, a brave Mexican newspaper editor tries to expose the mob and the local official corruption at his own risk.In Tijuana, a brave Mexican newspaper editor tries to expose the mob and the local official corruption at his own risk.
Abdullah Abbas
- Pedrstrian
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Eddie Baker
- Businessman
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Frank Balderrama
- Funeral Guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Herman Belmonte
- Bar Patron
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Arthur Berkeley
- Funeral Guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Eumenio Blanco
- Funeral Guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Phil Bloom
- Funeral Guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Crusading newspaperman Rodolfo Acosta takes on 'the syndicate' in Tijuana after a young man goes berserk when the police try to arrest him for damage he's done while under the influence of marijuana. The syndicate promptly tries to shut him up, first by scaring off his advertisers, and then by any means they deem necessary.
The notes indicate the lead's character is based on a real-life newspaperman named Manuel Acosta Meza. A brief Google search could not turn up the individual. Apparently it's not that unusual a name.
The movie is a variety of the sort of movie like THE MIAMI STORY. It is a very sincere picture, but also obviously a cheap movie, with bare, simple sets. A few location sessions around Tijuana help, but despite its statement that the town was cleaning up, by the time I was there in 1971, it was pretty sleazy again.
The notes indicate the lead's character is based on a real-life newspaperman named Manuel Acosta Meza. A brief Google search could not turn up the individual. Apparently it's not that unusual a name.
The movie is a variety of the sort of movie like THE MIAMI STORY. It is a very sincere picture, but also obviously a cheap movie, with bare, simple sets. A few location sessions around Tijuana help, but despite its statement that the town was cleaning up, by the time I was there in 1971, it was pretty sleazy again.
"The Tijuana Story" is far from a great film, but it is entertaining and well made...and also treats most Mexicans quite well for an American film from this era.
According to IMDB, this movie and the crusading newspaper man, Rodolfo Acosta, are based on Manuel Acosta Meza, a reported in Tijuana was who murdered the year before the film debuted. The film is about a crusade led by Acosta to rid the city of organized crime. Now he was NOT trying to rid the city of all crime and vice (after all, it is Tijuana) but he tried to get the mobsters out of town by exposing their graft in his paper. But you know this can only go on so long before the mob has had enough and decide to kill him.
The mobster portion of the film is excellent and I liked how the film showed the good and evil in the town....as well as American mobsters who were pulling the strings of the local creeps. In other words, it's not some sort of anti-Mexican film taking cheap shots.
What wasn't so great was the portion with the young James Darren. While a fine actor and singer, here it really looks as if they had two different movies and chopped the Darren portion out of one film and stuck it in the other. His actions really had nothing to do with the mobsters and his characters end seemed baffling and ill-suited for the film. If I ever meet the man, I'd love to ask him about this....surely his part was either chopped to pieces or added in at the last minute. Regardless, it just didn't fit.
On balance, despite this Darren portion the film is exciting, well made for a low-budget film and well worth seeing.
According to IMDB, this movie and the crusading newspaper man, Rodolfo Acosta, are based on Manuel Acosta Meza, a reported in Tijuana was who murdered the year before the film debuted. The film is about a crusade led by Acosta to rid the city of organized crime. Now he was NOT trying to rid the city of all crime and vice (after all, it is Tijuana) but he tried to get the mobsters out of town by exposing their graft in his paper. But you know this can only go on so long before the mob has had enough and decide to kill him.
The mobster portion of the film is excellent and I liked how the film showed the good and evil in the town....as well as American mobsters who were pulling the strings of the local creeps. In other words, it's not some sort of anti-Mexican film taking cheap shots.
What wasn't so great was the portion with the young James Darren. While a fine actor and singer, here it really looks as if they had two different movies and chopped the Darren portion out of one film and stuck it in the other. His actions really had nothing to do with the mobsters and his characters end seemed baffling and ill-suited for the film. If I ever meet the man, I'd love to ask him about this....surely his part was either chopped to pieces or added in at the last minute. Regardless, it just didn't fit.
On balance, despite this Darren portion the film is exciting, well made for a low-budget film and well worth seeing.
This extremely dull would-be exploitation movie from Columbia Pictures and untalented producer Sam Katzman is hard to sit through. The titillating elements of the story remain unfulfilled, and instead we're treated to an hour or so of flat acting, sad excuse for "crusading" preachiness, and low-budget boredom.
James Darren is here for Katzman's targeted youth audience and offers nothing in a role where a charismatic young actor might have impressed. His heroine/love interest Joy Stoner is pretty, but can't act, perhaps a fitting complement to Darren. It was her only featured movie role.
As for Robert Blake, he has a nothing part playing the son of hero Rodolfo Acosta (very boring as the crusading Mexican newspaperman).
James Darren is here for Katzman's targeted youth audience and offers nothing in a role where a charismatic young actor might have impressed. His heroine/love interest Joy Stoner is pretty, but can't act, perhaps a fitting complement to Darren. It was her only featured movie role.
As for Robert Blake, he has a nothing part playing the son of hero Rodolfo Acosta (very boring as the crusading Mexican newspaperman).
Gallant little guy standing up to the mob. Hardly an original storyline (sub-Jimmy Stewart), but this is a dramatised documentary, quite a common low-cost option in 1957, celebrating the recent martyrdom of newspaper editor Manuel Acosta Mesa, who had been trying to clean up Tijuana single-handed. The funeral tribute, with which the film ends ("He did not die in vain"), would earn a belly-laugh today, with its naïve hopes about turning the city back into a family-friendly community from which gangsterism had been banished forever. One glimpse of modern-day Tijuana would have made those audiences feel they'd been watching a kids' game 'Let's Play Narcos'.
Only one performance stands out - the villain Diaz, played by Paul Newlan, highly convincing, with gangsterism deeply embedded in him. No-one else comes close. The 20-year old James Darren gets star billing, but a curiously small part that offers him few opportunities and hardly affects the plot. It just adds a touch of pathos: a schoolkid on vacation, wanting to try his first grown-up Mexican weekend, but doomed from the moment a bar-girl offers to sell him marijuana ("Are you too frightened?"), leading indirectly to his death. The rest of it is disappointingly mechanical, both in plot and in delivery, hardly worth watching.
(And to think, despite my fluent Spanish, it had never occurred to me that Tijuana translates as 'Auntie Jane'!)
Only one performance stands out - the villain Diaz, played by Paul Newlan, highly convincing, with gangsterism deeply embedded in him. No-one else comes close. The 20-year old James Darren gets star billing, but a curiously small part that offers him few opportunities and hardly affects the plot. It just adds a touch of pathos: a schoolkid on vacation, wanting to try his first grown-up Mexican weekend, but doomed from the moment a bar-girl offers to sell him marijuana ("Are you too frightened?"), leading indirectly to his death. The rest of it is disappointingly mechanical, both in plot and in delivery, hardly worth watching.
(And to think, despite my fluent Spanish, it had never occurred to me that Tijuana translates as 'Auntie Jane'!)
TIJUANA STORY is a tepid crime drama based on a true story of newspaperman, Manuel Acosta Mesa (Rudolfo Acosta) who takes on the mob / syndicate led by fictionalized mobster Peron Diaz (Paul Newlan). After Acosta digs up the names of influential politicians involved in Diaz's illegal activities, he is targeted for assassination.
The movie opens with a newsreel-style recounting of Acosta's importance as a whistle blower, followed by a talking head American journalist who actually wrote about the Acosta case. His tone suggests that Acosta Mesa had brought trouble upon himself due to the provocative nature of his reporting. While the real-life story of this brave journalist could have made a good, hard-hitting exposé, but we're in producer Sam Katzman territory, which means poor production values, one-take performances and sensationalized dramatics.
The denizens of Tijuana are shown as mostly villainous peasants, while the top line casting is strictly from Hollywood and Vine. For example, the main Hispanic mob boss is played by Paul Newlan, who was born in Plattsburgh, Nebraska. Acosta's daughter and the newspaper publisher are both played by Anglos. The sassy bar girl who talks Mitch into buying marijuana makes the mistake of trying on an irritating Mexican accent.
Despite these handicaps, a few performances stand out: Rudolfo Acosto is a strong presence playing against type as the hero but his delivery is stilted. Jean Willes plays the stereotypical mob moll with some class, and James Darren and Robert Blake make an impression as a disaffected J.D. and as Acosta's son, respectively. Darren had been signed to a long-term contract with Columbia Pictures in the summer of 1956, and TIJUANA STORY was one of several B-movies that featured the young actor. However, he plays a small role here in scenes that look like they were an afterthought and are barely connected with the Acosta plot-line.
On balance, none of these thespians are supported by the clichéd screenplay by the usually competent Lou Morheim, which contains its share of clumsy dialog, such as, "I know you've had some results crashing into walruses," "A little bit of that would put hair on my chest, oh, mama," "What are you, an avenging angel?"
Likewise, the direction and staging of many scenes is unimaginative and at times unintentionally funny, as when faux jazz players blithely continue their playing on a night club stage while half the cast is fist fighting and throwing chairs around on the dance floor.
The movie opens with a newsreel-style recounting of Acosta's importance as a whistle blower, followed by a talking head American journalist who actually wrote about the Acosta case. His tone suggests that Acosta Mesa had brought trouble upon himself due to the provocative nature of his reporting. While the real-life story of this brave journalist could have made a good, hard-hitting exposé, but we're in producer Sam Katzman territory, which means poor production values, one-take performances and sensationalized dramatics.
The denizens of Tijuana are shown as mostly villainous peasants, while the top line casting is strictly from Hollywood and Vine. For example, the main Hispanic mob boss is played by Paul Newlan, who was born in Plattsburgh, Nebraska. Acosta's daughter and the newspaper publisher are both played by Anglos. The sassy bar girl who talks Mitch into buying marijuana makes the mistake of trying on an irritating Mexican accent.
Despite these handicaps, a few performances stand out: Rudolfo Acosto is a strong presence playing against type as the hero but his delivery is stilted. Jean Willes plays the stereotypical mob moll with some class, and James Darren and Robert Blake make an impression as a disaffected J.D. and as Acosta's son, respectively. Darren had been signed to a long-term contract with Columbia Pictures in the summer of 1956, and TIJUANA STORY was one of several B-movies that featured the young actor. However, he plays a small role here in scenes that look like they were an afterthought and are barely connected with the Acosta plot-line.
On balance, none of these thespians are supported by the clichéd screenplay by the usually competent Lou Morheim, which contains its share of clumsy dialog, such as, "I know you've had some results crashing into walruses," "A little bit of that would put hair on my chest, oh, mama," "What are you, an avenging angel?"
Likewise, the direction and staging of many scenes is unimaginative and at times unintentionally funny, as when faux jazz players blithely continue their playing on a night club stage while half the cast is fist fighting and throwing chairs around on the dance floor.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाSusan Seaforth Hayes's debut.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Tijuana Story?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Случай в Тихуане
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- मेक्सिको(location shooting)
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 13 मि(73 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें