Les Trois Mousquetaires: Milady
Titre original : Les trois mousquetaires: Milady
- 2023
- Tous publics
- 1h 55min
D'Artagnan est contraint de s'allier à Milady pour sauver Constance, enlevée sous ses yeux. Mais alors que la guerre est déclarée et qu'Athos, Porthos et Aramis ont déjà rejoint le front, un... Tout lireD'Artagnan est contraint de s'allier à Milady pour sauver Constance, enlevée sous ses yeux. Mais alors que la guerre est déclarée et qu'Athos, Porthos et Aramis ont déjà rejoint le front, un secret du passé brise les anciennes alliances.D'Artagnan est contraint de s'allier à Milady pour sauver Constance, enlevée sous ses yeux. Mais alors que la guerre est déclarée et qu'Athos, Porthos et Aramis ont déjà rejoint le front, un secret du passé brise les anciennes alliances.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 8 nominations au total
Julien Frison
- Gaston de France
- (as Julien Frison de la Comédie Française)
Avis à la une
I can't say that I enjoyed this as much as the first outing for this new breed of musketeers, but it's still an enjoyable and authentic looking adaptation of these timeless and honourable Dumas characters. We know that "Constance" (Lyna Khoudri) has been kidnapped and that the enamoured "D'Artagnan" (François Civil) is determined to get her back - but how? Well the almost fatal attack on the king (Louis Garrel) has galvanised everyone - friend and foe, and the musketeers determine that they must get to the ringleader of that plot before it is eventually accomplished and the kingdom is plunged into chaotic warfare. Now everyone suspects the malevolent Cardinal Richelieu (Eric Ruf) but surely it's not in his interests to kill Louis XIII? The Queen (Vicky Krieps) and her not-so-secret English lover Buckingham (Jacob Fortune-Lloyd) might be in the mix, or maybe just a disgruntled nobleman? "D'Artagnan" is first with a clue after he inadvertently rescues "Milady" (Eva Green) from a prison (after she fell off a cliff!) armed with a secret, coded letter. What does it mean? Can it help find his love and save the kingdom? Meantime, we start to learn a little more about this enigmatic "MIlady" and of her relationship with "Athos" (Vincent Cassel) whilst his two pals "Aramis" (Romain Duris) and the affable "Porthos" (Pio Marmaï) do their bit for the story and the country too. It looks great - the settings, the costumes, the combat scenes all smack of effort having been spent on making the scenarios ring true. I'm still no great fan of Eva Green, but here she starts to exude just the tiniest hint of menace as the story builds to the conclusion of this search for love and traitors. It's a wee bit more earnest, this time around - there's less humour and I missed that. I don't mean laugh out loud stuff, but here we rarely see all the musketeers together; their camaraderie isn't so obvious. This is essentially Civil v Green and that doesn't always work so well. Still, it's a solid and quickly paced adventure story that I found passed two hours effortlessly.
Well.. Since watching the first installment I really looked forward to this. The first one was everything I could ask for from a classic swashbuckling adventure.
However, this left me with a kind of unsatisfying feeling but there were a lot of positives too.
The scenery and atmosphere and general is great. Everything I could ask for. And Eva Green.. What an actress she is.. I know she usually plays mysterious villains but still. She's just good.
In general I enjoyed the acting as well. Maybe not great from everyone but the characters were ok.
But then the plot and the climax.. I still don't know what was really going on and from what I've read I am not alone in that. I believe they changed a lot from the book as well which messed it up more than it should have (never read it but I will).
I will watch it again some day though to maybe get a better understanding and possibly after reading the book to at least know the core of the story a bit better.
Still watchable but could have been better.
However, this left me with a kind of unsatisfying feeling but there were a lot of positives too.
The scenery and atmosphere and general is great. Everything I could ask for. And Eva Green.. What an actress she is.. I know she usually plays mysterious villains but still. She's just good.
In general I enjoyed the acting as well. Maybe not great from everyone but the characters were ok.
But then the plot and the climax.. I still don't know what was really going on and from what I've read I am not alone in that. I believe they changed a lot from the book as well which messed it up more than it should have (never read it but I will).
I will watch it again some day though to maybe get a better understanding and possibly after reading the book to at least know the core of the story a bit better.
Still watchable but could have been better.
Plenty of positives including an exceptional cast (with the exception of Constance), the cinematography was mostly good (a few scenes a little too dark) , most of the scenes were well paced and costumes looked authentic.
However, the story seemed a lot more disjointed than the first movie and it didnt seem like there was enough time for character building (maybe we get spoilt with the amount of time series have but with 3 movies it felt like more could have been achieved). The worst part however, was the sudden revelation of super female fighters able to compete if not better the supposed best male sword fighters in the country....
The story was frustrating enough that i feel the need to re read the book after 20 plus years as im sure i remember it being a lot more coherent than this movie !
However, the story seemed a lot more disjointed than the first movie and it didnt seem like there was enough time for character building (maybe we get spoilt with the amount of time series have but with 3 movies it felt like more could have been achieved). The worst part however, was the sudden revelation of super female fighters able to compete if not better the supposed best male sword fighters in the country....
The story was frustrating enough that i feel the need to re read the book after 20 plus years as im sure i remember it being a lot more coherent than this movie !
I love Eva she is amazing and sensual in this movie that i liked more than the. First one because she appears than the previous one and that's actually make the movie better only because of her and her beautiful voice and face, love that girl to be honest, overall very forgettable and kinda of a mess, I suppose there is going to be a third part my guys, and that's fine I guess let's wait two years for that and i hope Eva is in that movie too, she is the love of my life and i desire her, she is just fantastic actress and she knows it, she is the boss. Love her very much and i would do anything for her.
Part 2 of the current film adaptation is by no means a bad film, thanks to the actors, budget and, of course, the literary source material. Nevertheless, it falls well short of its predecessor, not least because of the high expectations following the first film. What's missing this time? A certain freshness, the haunting presence of the protagonists, their actually indispensable interaction, memorable climaxes. Content now rules here, almost too much for the running time, instead of fun.
Eva Green gives an outstanding performance in her parade role as the femme fatale, this time making the important and correct decision that less is often more.
Eva Green gives an outstanding performance in her parade role as the femme fatale, this time making the important and correct decision that less is often more.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe film was shot back to back with its prequel Les Trois Mousquetaires : D'Artagnan (2023) for a total shoot of 150 days that started on August 16, 2021 and wrapped on June 3, 2022.
- GaffesAt different moments both movies feature firearms. These are incorrect. Actually, they are 150 years ahead, given the action is supposed to take place in 1627. The hand-weapons and riffles are revolutionary/Napoleonic era. Under Louis XIII's reign, firearms were much more rudimentary.
- ConnexionsFollows Les Trois Mousquetaires : D'Artagnan (2023)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Three Musketeers - Part II: Milady?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Los Tres Mosqueteros: Milady
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 36 000 000 € (estimé)
- Montant brut mondial
- 15 439 299 $US
- Durée1 heure 55 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.41 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant