Le Comte de Monte-Cristo
- 2024
- Tous publics
- 2h 58min
Une nouvelle adaptation du célèbre roman d'Alexandre Dumas.Une nouvelle adaptation du célèbre roman d'Alexandre Dumas.Une nouvelle adaptation du célèbre roman d'Alexandre Dumas.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 6 victoires et 17 nominations au total
Laurent Lafitte
- Gérard de Villefort
- (as Laurent Lafitte de la Comédie Française)
Stéphane Varupenne
- Caderousse
- (as Stéphane Varupenne de la Comédie Française)
Abde Maziane
- Jacopo
- (as Abdé Maziane)
Résumé
Reviewers say 'The Count of Monte-Cristo' adaptation garners mixed reactions, highlighting visual richness, strong performances, and deviations from the original novel. Praise is given to the cinematography, production design, and Pierre Niney's portrayal of Edmond Dantès. However, the script faces criticism for altering key plot points, characters, and the novel's ending, which many feel reduces the story's depth and emotional impact. Some appreciate the modernization and streamlined narrative, while others miss the novel's complexity and moral dilemmas.
Avis à la une
I will not deny it, I think the film is really beautiful : production design, costumes, props... and of course lighting (congrats M. Bolduc) and many other details helped make it a wonderful experience for the eyes, in my opinion.
Now with a plot so huge as with Dumas', so many characters, theads, sub-stories and such, the authors had to cut things, adapt, re-write... betray, as is often necessary or critical with any adaptation!
That's a given.
But why dishonor the original author's choices (Dumas')?
Why betray the lessons he wanted to impart : Monte Cristo's moral dilemma, his good nature overall, his help to so many, and unrivaled loyalty to anyone who had been good to him or deserved it in any way ?
Why change Haydée's love for him for a silly romance?
Even Mercedes' understanding of Monte Cristo's actions and why she can't be saved, and why Albert has to follow her are admirable, in the book...
And what are we left with, here?
Pure show?
I can assure you it's not what remains, when you read it.
Now with a plot so huge as with Dumas', so many characters, theads, sub-stories and such, the authors had to cut things, adapt, re-write... betray, as is often necessary or critical with any adaptation!
That's a given.
But why dishonor the original author's choices (Dumas')?
Why betray the lessons he wanted to impart : Monte Cristo's moral dilemma, his good nature overall, his help to so many, and unrivaled loyalty to anyone who had been good to him or deserved it in any way ?
Why change Haydée's love for him for a silly romance?
Even Mercedes' understanding of Monte Cristo's actions and why she can't be saved, and why Albert has to follow her are admirable, in the book...
And what are we left with, here?
Pure show?
I can assure you it's not what remains, when you read it.
Well, this a great piece of cinema, the actors play well, the scenes are well designed and the music is top notch. Yet, at someone that read the book before, a lot of the actual story, is not just missing but heavily modified. This is frustrating and they main reason it's a 8 and not 10, but I guess taking a 6 books story into a 3 hours move isn't that easy. Some of the original characters are missing and grouped into new character (Angelel). So, if you are not a Dumas fanatic, go watch it, you will have a good time ! The 3 hours feel like 20 minutes, with good romance, great costumes, great action scenes and drama.
It is always tricky to approach something as complex as this novel and try to get a coherent movie that features all the plots, and sub-plots, and sub-sub-plots, let alone book accurate characters.
I enjoyed the Richard Chamberlain TV movie, and the 2002 film despite some wholesale plot chopping in both. Even the 1998 6 hour 23 minute miniseries couldn't do the complete story and that's been my definite adaptation for the last 25 years.
The point being that to fit into 3 hours it was clear that some plot-lines were going to axed, characters changed and a streamlining of the narrative.
It then becomes a case of whether it was done in a way that allows those who don't already know the story, those who may have read the book three or four times, and all those in between to enjoy it.
Clearly the producers understood the underlying themes and (apart from one quibble I had which I'm not going to post as a spoiler) did great service to the original and still managed to include some sub-plots I thought they were going to cut out.
Of course, if you're a purist who hated Lord of the Rings because Peter Jackson changed characters and aspects from a 100% faithful adaptation of the book then you aren't going to like this either.
Totally entertained and it never once felt like a 3 hour film.
It also has a great soundtrack, the reprise of which had me stay for the whole credits.
I enjoyed the Richard Chamberlain TV movie, and the 2002 film despite some wholesale plot chopping in both. Even the 1998 6 hour 23 minute miniseries couldn't do the complete story and that's been my definite adaptation for the last 25 years.
The point being that to fit into 3 hours it was clear that some plot-lines were going to axed, characters changed and a streamlining of the narrative.
It then becomes a case of whether it was done in a way that allows those who don't already know the story, those who may have read the book three or four times, and all those in between to enjoy it.
Clearly the producers understood the underlying themes and (apart from one quibble I had which I'm not going to post as a spoiler) did great service to the original and still managed to include some sub-plots I thought they were going to cut out.
Of course, if you're a purist who hated Lord of the Rings because Peter Jackson changed characters and aspects from a 100% faithful adaptation of the book then you aren't going to like this either.
Totally entertained and it never once felt like a 3 hour film.
It also has a great soundtrack, the reprise of which had me stay for the whole credits.
Have you ever had something really unfair happen to you?
Have you ever been betrayed by people you trusted?
Have you ever had the feeling of wanting to show them all and teach them a lesson?
Have you ever been mad with rage?
Have you ever thought that if you had the chance you would do so much good in the world?
Have you ever wondered about what cost your actions and words have on other people far out in the future?
Have you ever been consumed with an idea you wouldn't separate from?
Have you ever held onto someone even though they moved on?
Have you ever had your life fall apart?
Have you ever convinced yourself that you were right, only to learn that you were wrong?
If you can say yes to just one of these things. This movie is for you. A masterpiece. I sat with profound feelings of mercy and grace towards myself and others after watching this movie.
Have you ever been betrayed by people you trusted?
Have you ever had the feeling of wanting to show them all and teach them a lesson?
Have you ever been mad with rage?
Have you ever thought that if you had the chance you would do so much good in the world?
Have you ever wondered about what cost your actions and words have on other people far out in the future?
Have you ever been consumed with an idea you wouldn't separate from?
Have you ever held onto someone even though they moved on?
Have you ever had your life fall apart?
Have you ever convinced yourself that you were right, only to learn that you were wrong?
If you can say yes to just one of these things. This movie is for you. A masterpiece. I sat with profound feelings of mercy and grace towards myself and others after watching this movie.
I read the books and saw two other versions of it as a film.
I asked myself what was the idea to make another version even though 18 exist already.
I watched it in French and realized that it is pretty far off the original storyline. Some characters are missing and others adapted. Apart from the great costumes and the brilliant locations, it seemed to me that only the beautiful, 'rich' sides were shown. The prison seemed too romanticised to me, as did the society. The Count could hardly stand out from the others due to his wealth and mystique, because this didn't always come to the surface.
Nevertheless, the film is entertaining and I was never bored. It managed to tell the whole story, although in a different way. Unfortunately, I couldn't answer the question of why this film was made, because it's just another version.
Watch the film if you don't know the story yet and like a romanticised story. Otherwise, I recommend the book by Alexandre Dumas and the film 'The Count of Monte Cristo 2002'.
I asked myself what was the idea to make another version even though 18 exist already.
I watched it in French and realized that it is pretty far off the original storyline. Some characters are missing and others adapted. Apart from the great costumes and the brilliant locations, it seemed to me that only the beautiful, 'rich' sides were shown. The prison seemed too romanticised to me, as did the society. The Count could hardly stand out from the others due to his wealth and mystique, because this didn't always come to the surface.
Nevertheless, the film is entertaining and I was never bored. It managed to tell the whole story, although in a different way. Unfortunately, I couldn't answer the question of why this film was made, because it's just another version.
Watch the film if you don't know the story yet and like a romanticised story. Otherwise, I recommend the book by Alexandre Dumas and the film 'The Count of Monte Cristo 2002'.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWith a budget estimated in EUR42.9 million, The Count of Monte Cristo is the most expensive French film of 2024.
- GaffesWhen Albert watches Hydee sing and play the guitar, it is very obvious that she is not even touching the strings half of the time.
- Citations
Danglars: The story makes no sense. We're swimming in madness. My boats were still in Marseilles yesterday. I will need a delay to pay you back. If...
Edmond Dantès: You have nothing left, Baron. Everything that was yours is now mine. The only thing you have left are these clothes. Leave Paris, and perhaps I will not let your wife and your daughter starve.
Danglars: But, Count, I...
Edmond Dantès: Do you find me brutal, Baron? "Not only do I know it, but I take pride in it." You should escort your wife home. She looks quite pale.
- ConnexionsFeatured in La grande semaine: Épisode #1.13 (2024)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Count of Monte-Cristo?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- El conde de Montecristo
- Lieux de tournage
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 42 900 000 € (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 529 830 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 17 426 $US
- 22 déc. 2024
- Montant brut mondial
- 78 573 383 $US
- Durée2 heures 58 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Le Comte de Monte-Cristo (2024)?
Répondre