Après s'être dérobés l'un l'autre, deux voleurs se retrouvent embarqués pour la Chine. Afin d'échapper à la police Hongkongaise, Meldrick a la mauvaise idée de se déguiser en officier qui l'... Tout lireAprès s'être dérobés l'un l'autre, deux voleurs se retrouvent embarqués pour la Chine. Afin d'échapper à la police Hongkongaise, Meldrick a la mauvaise idée de se déguiser en officier qui l'amène à être envoyé sur le front sino-japonais.Après s'être dérobés l'un l'autre, deux voleurs se retrouvent embarqués pour la Chine. Afin d'échapper à la police Hongkongaise, Meldrick a la mauvaise idée de se déguiser en officier qui l'amène à être envoyé sur le front sino-japonais.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 victoires au total
- Hotel Manager
- (as Edward Ciannelli)
- Japanese Officer
- (non crédité)
- Japanese Radio Man
- (non crédité)
- Sailor
- (non crédité)
- Soldier in Saloon
- (non crédité)
- Soldier in Saloon
- (non crédité)
- Restaurant Patron
- (non crédité)
- Officer
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
On the most part, 'They Met in Bombay' doesn't disappoint. Not quite one of those completely living up to high expectations and exceeding them, but it nearly does and in no way a waste of potential. 'They Met in Bombay' is not necessarily great. It is uneven and disjointed for reasons that will be explained later and actually have been covered already in previous reviews. 'They Met in Bombay' having said that is also very entertaining, would classify it as a good film that is hard to dislike and with nothing to be offended by.
Good things are a great many. Clark Gable and Rosalind Russell are terrific in the lead roles, particularly Gable. Lots of charm and with great comic timing, their chemistry sparkles. Peter Lorre, Reginald Owen, Matthew Boulton and Jessie Ralph give nice support, Lorre and Boulton coming off most memorably.
Production values are lovely to look at, particularly the crisp photography. The score is suitably peppy and the direction sees someone with a lot of talent doing a more than solid job. 'They Met in Bombay' goes at a snappy pace, the script is funny, witty and surprisingly sophisticated and the story for the near-perfect first two thirds is immensely engaging with plenty of well done scenes (including a hilarious scene in a beauty parlour).
It is a shame that the last third is not as good. The pace slackens, the wit and sophistication disappears and the patriotic element that is introduced feels heavy-handed and almost tacky, it just felt very misplaced. With the more action-heavy and political edge 'They Met in Bombay' did feel like a completely different film, and one that wasn't near as interesting or entertaining as the first two thirds (which only had the predictability to fault it).
Also thought that Gerald's character went through a character change to a more heroic personality trait that also jarred, almost like there were two different Geralds.
Concluding, a good and entertaining film let down by a disappointing final third that was enough to bring the film's quality quite a bit. 7/10 Bethany Cox
It's a fairly formulaic film carried on the charms of the leads; director Clarence Brown can't overcome the MGM gloss to provide the screwball details that the first half of the film really needs, although Peter Lorre as a shady and unctuous tramp steamer captain is a lot of fun.
I have the feeling Miss Russell replaced Myrna Loy at some stage in the production and the first couple of reels show damage. Clarence Brown directs the comedy bits for everyone but the two leads, a telling indictment of his opinion of their chops. Even worse, William H. Daniel's high-lit camerawork makes Miss Russell look a trifle jowly.
The first half is a fun little screw-ball caper. I like both Gable and Russell having fun with the characters and each other. It's loads of fun in a light affair. The movie eventually turns into war movie and it's not always the best. Gable and Russell get separated in a large middle section. Gable's con is a bit fun until the war breaks out. The action, the vehicles, and the gears are not the most realistic. It's also wartime in the real world and a bit of war propaganda is to be expected. This is a good pairing and one can excuse any flaws for the greater cause. The mix of a real war and light comedy is just a bit awkward.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThey Met in Bombay was the third film Rosalind Russell and Clark Gable made together. In the first two, Forsaking All Others (1934) and China Seas (1935), Russell wasn't Gable's leading lady. Joan Crawford stole his heart in Forsaking All Others and in China Seas, Russell played Gable's former girlfriend, who faced some tough competition in Jean Harlow. But given the opportunity, Russell genuinely enjoyed working with Gable and unlike some of his co-stars, was at ease playing love scenes opposite him. No director ever had to give him directions in a love scene. He was a very graceful person...much like a ballet dancer. "He was beautiful to play a love scene with," Russell commented. She also recalled how much difficulty she normally had filming romantic scenes. "Love scenes...(were) murder for me," said Russell. "The only man who could make a love scene comfortable was Clark Gable."
- GaffesWhen the Japanese soldiers confront Meldrick in the town square and, again, when the Japanese set an ambush on the road, they are wearing German "coal scuttle" helmets. In fact, contemporary photographs of the Japanese Army in China (e.g., during the Rape of Nanking) show Japanese soldiers with German army "coal scuttle" helmets, which, obviously, were purchased from Nazi Germany.
- Citations
Gerald Meldrick: It's my duty to arrest you... but how can a man put handcuffs on moonlight?
- ConnexionsFeatured in Clark Gable: Tall, Dark and Handsome (1996)
- Bandes originalesOn the Road to Mandalay
(uncredited)
Music by Oley Speaks
Lyrics by Rudyard Kipling
Played several times as part of the score
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- They Met in Bombay
- Lieux de tournage
- Société de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 1 380 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 32min(92 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.37 : 1