In einer Zukunft, in der die Menschen mit 25 aufhören zu altern und so modifiziert sind, dann nur noch ein Jahr zu leben, bedeutet dies für einige, die die Mittel haben, sich aus dieser Situ... Alles lesenIn einer Zukunft, in der die Menschen mit 25 aufhören zu altern und so modifiziert sind, dann nur noch ein Jahr zu leben, bedeutet dies für einige, die die Mittel haben, sich aus dieser Situation freizukaufen, so gut wie unsterbliche Jugend. In dieser Welt wird Will Salas des Mor... Alles lesenIn einer Zukunft, in der die Menschen mit 25 aufhören zu altern und so modifiziert sind, dann nur noch ein Jahr zu leben, bedeutet dies für einige, die die Mittel haben, sich aus dieser Situation freizukaufen, so gut wie unsterbliche Jugend. In dieser Welt wird Will Salas des Mordes beschuldigt und findet sich auf der Flucht mit einer Geisel wieder - eine Verbindung, ... Alles lesen
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
The cinematography is visually stunning, with proficient use of lighting in both daylight and night scenes, although the lighting in some club scenes feels a bit off. The film makes effective use of medium and long shots, complemented by great editing, particularly in the car chase scenes, which are thrilling and well-executed.
However, the editing feels clumsy and choppy at times, detracting from the overall experience. The pacing is intentionally rushed, aligning with the protagonist's characteristics. Despite enjoying the film, it feels like there are missed opportunities, especially in exploring its rich concept.
The writing captures the dystopian feel well, with time as the currency in a world where the poor and the rich are starkly divided. The film raises philosophical questions about life, death, time, justice, generosity, capitalism, poverty, morality, and trust. The dialogue is engaging, but the concept sometimes feels underdeveloped, lacking depth and straightforwardness.
The chase and fight scenes are entertaining, and the production design, with its contemporary buildings and futuristic cars and clothing, enhances the film's atmosphere. The soundtrack is unique, with a calm, mellow, and slightly electronic touch, featuring gritty bass lines and a dystopian feel. It's not generic but purposeful in its composition.
This film feels like a school project with a high budget. It could have benefited from extended scenes and more action sequences to fully explore its potential.
Overall, In Time is an interesting watch with visually stunning cinematography and a unique concept. Strong 6/10, decent 7/10.
The plot for this film is very unique, I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this. There was a lot of familiar actors in this (Cillian Murphy, Johnny Galecki, Vincent Kartheiser to name a few). The acting was very good overall I thought, even from Justin Timberlake in the lead role.
There was some good drama as well as good action scenes (car chases, shooting etc). It is the sort of film that will keep you guessing as to what will happen next and it was just a very interesting concept overall.
It would have been nice if there was a bit more back story though, it was never really explained why the world was like it was. Apart from that, just take it for what it is and enjoy it.
Would recommend it to anyone who fancies watching something a bit different.
8/10.
And while yes, there are ugly twenty-five-year-olds, this movie doesn't feature any of them. Everyone is young and good looking. Justin Timberlake, Amanda Seyfried, Cillian Murphy, Matt Bomer, Olivia Wilde (who plays Justin's mom!), and other beautiful people grace the screen. There's a definite class distinction, with the "wealthy" betting thousands of hours at the casinos and the "poor" borrowing time from their neighbors just to make it to the next day. When Justin decides to spread the wealth (with the help from his new main squeeze), he's at risk from the wealthy people who want to stop him, the poor who are desperate for time, and the cops.
I love this movie and own a well-worn DVD copy. I saw it in the theaters, I watch it at home for fun, and it's still very entertaining. If you missed it because you thought it would be a cheap thriller, think again. It's one of the better ones.
In my opinion, In Time was an original well written and well acted and truly thought provoking production and I loved it. The fact that it subtly questioned our morality and made us question real world issues such as poverty and political stance was just one of the things that made me love this movie.
To the people who dislike the feature and to those negative reviews which I have read I have a few responses. Firstly, I saw a point about not enough back story into the body clock. The first thought that struck me was really? The movie is not centred around the body clock, and furthermore throughout the film we are told of its uses and get to a fairly good understanding to how it works. Do you not agree that any more back story would waste time and most likely just bore the typical viewer? Finally to those who disliked the acting and script I strongly disagree. I though both Justin and Amanda played there parts very well and there chemistry was as good as any action film I have scene.
I would highly recommend this film to anyone, and suggest if you haven't already seen it you should definitely make some time if you think you will enjoy this movie.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe film takes place in 2169.
- PatzerWhen congratulating his mother with her 50th birthday Will says: "25 for the 25th time". However 25 for the 25th time would be her 49th birthday. On her 50th birthday she turns 25 for the 26th time.
- Zitate
Henry Hamilton: How old are you? In real time?
Will Salas: 28.
Henry Hamilton: I'm 105.
Will Salas: Good for you. You won't see 106, you have too many more nights like tonight.
Henry Hamilton: You are right. But the day comes when you've had enough. Your mind can be spent, even if your body's not. We want to die. We need to.
Will Salas: That's your problem? You've been alive too long? You ever known anyone who's died?
Henry Hamilton: For a few to be immortal, many must die.
Will Salas: What the hell is that supposed to mean?
Henry Hamilton: You really don't know, do you? Everyone can't live forever. Where would we put them? Why do you think there are time zones? Why do you think taxes and prices go up the same day in the ghetto? The cost of living keeps rising to make sure people keep dying. How else could there be men with a million years while most live day to day? But the truth is... there's more than enough. No one has to die before their time. If you had as much time as I have on that clock, what would you do with it?
Will Salas: I'd stop watching it. I can tell you one thing. If I had all that time, I sure as hell wouldn't waste it.
- Crazy CreditsIn the start and end credits, some letters such as O and I, begin as numbers which count down to 0 or 1.
- VerbindungenFeatured in In Time: The Minutes (2005)
- SoundtracksMi Swing es Tropical (Zeb's Reggae Remix)
Written by Nickodemus (as Nicolas DeSimone), Hector Alomar and William Holland
Performed by Nickodemus and Quantic featuring Hector "Tempo Alomar"
Courtesy of Wonderwheel Records
By arrangement with Visions from the Roof
Top-Auswahl
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- El precio del mañana
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 40.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 37.520.095 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 12.050.368 $
- 30. Okt. 2011
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 173.930.596 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 49 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1