[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Back to Gaya

  • 2004
  • 6
  • 1 Std. 31 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,2/10
1925
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Back to Gaya (2004)
Home Video Trailer from First Look
trailer wiedergeben2:07
1 Video
4 Fotos
Computer-AnimationAnimationsfilmFantasie

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe beautiful world of Gaya is home to a community of creatures, who are much smaller than humans, but who have an uncanny resemblance to them. But the Gayans are facing imminent danger. Som... Alles lesenThe beautiful world of Gaya is home to a community of creatures, who are much smaller than humans, but who have an uncanny resemblance to them. But the Gayans are facing imminent danger. Someone has stolen the magic stone called Dalamite without which this world is doomed. Two Ga... Alles lesenThe beautiful world of Gaya is home to a community of creatures, who are much smaller than humans, but who have an uncanny resemblance to them. But the Gayans are facing imminent danger. Someone has stolen the magic stone called Dalamite without which this world is doomed. Two Gayans named Boo and Zino embark on a dangerous mission to track down and recover the stone.... Alles lesen

  • Regie
    • Lenard Fritz Krawinkel
    • Holger Tappe
  • Drehbuch
    • Jan Berger
    • Don McEnery
    • Bob Shaw
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Patrick Stewart
    • Emily Watson
    • Glenn Wrage
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    5,2/10
    1925
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Lenard Fritz Krawinkel
      • Holger Tappe
    • Drehbuch
      • Jan Berger
      • Don McEnery
      • Bob Shaw
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Patrick Stewart
      • Emily Watson
      • Glenn Wrage
    • 27Benutzerrezensionen
    • 14Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 2 Nominierungen insgesamt

    Videos1

    The Snurks (aka. Back to Gaya, aka. Boo, Zino & the Snurks )
    Trailer 2:07
    The Snurks (aka. Back to Gaya, aka. Boo, Zino & the Snurks )

    Fotos3

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung46

    Ändern
    Patrick Stewart
    Patrick Stewart
    • Albert Drollinger
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Emily Watson
    Emily Watson
    • Alanta
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Glenn Wrage
    Glenn Wrage
    • Zino
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Alan Marriott
    Alan Marriott
    • Boo
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Bob Saker
    • Mayor
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    • …
    Lorelei King
    Lorelei King
    • Female Gayan
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    • …
    Kate Robbins
    Kate Robbins
    • Female Gayan
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    • …
    John Guerrasio
    • Galger
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Redd Pepper
    • Bramph
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    • (as Red Pepper)
    John Schwab
    John Schwab
    • Zeck
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Stephan Lander
    • Professor N. Icely
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Claudia Lössl
    • E.N.I.A.C.
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Dimitri Kyrianos
    • Billy
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Dan Russell
    • Fred
    • (English version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    • …
    Michael Herbig
    Michael Herbig
    • Boo
    • (German version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Vanessa Petruo
    Vanessa Petruo
    • Alanta
    • (German version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Sebastian Höffner
    • Zeck
    • (German version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    Torsten Lennie Münchow
    • Zino
    • (German version)
    • (Synchronisation)
    • (as Torsten Münchow)
    • Regie
      • Lenard Fritz Krawinkel
      • Holger Tappe
    • Drehbuch
      • Jan Berger
      • Don McEnery
      • Bob Shaw
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen27

    5,21.9K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    8brentkincaid

    Terrific

    This movie is so cute! It has all the stuff the rest of the CGI animated stuff has except for the humor displayed. But, we must keep in mind this is the first German CGI animated flick ever. So, maybe some of their humor is different from ours in the USA. Still, it makes it to nice, fun level.

    I loved all the characters, and the facial characteristics of them were wonderful and a delight to see.

    I will admit the rats in the chase sequence would be a bit scary for the wee ones, but I saw Bambi and cried my eyes out at their age. So, I think maybe the kiddies will be tough enough for this.

    I give it an 8 out of 10. Keep the kids under about eight from watching it. The rest? You've said worse around your kids by that time. Let them have a romp through Gaya, why not?
    onwa

    decent, but far from great

    Well, I went to see this movie at a 10 a.m. showing before it got canned, and I was the only one in the cinema. So much for the trouble I went through in order to see this flick.

    Well turns that the 5 stars it received are justified. It's a movie that isn't really bad, but makes you cringe when you think what could have been considering ist potential. The Visuals are very good at times and not so good at others. The main technical problem of this movie is the rather unrefined degree of animation (crappy would be to harsh a description to use) which is displayed during the characters movement and them talking (lip sync, facial animation/expression, eye movement, etc..).

    The character's movements are either motion captured and therefore very smooth or handanimated. This mixture can work quite well, but it only works when you do a good job animating and blending these two styles in with each other so that nobody notices. Walking and other (relatively) easily capturable movements are done well, yet when it comes to complicated action scenes, with characters being thrown through air, holding on to the hood of a car the animation is poor and wooden. There is no persistent, "believeable" movement going on. In Toy Story for example characters did'nt necessarily move according to reality but they behaved in a unique and in the toy setting consistent as well as beleivable manner. Some polishing would have been necessary yet it didn't happen.

    The next problem are facial expressions weren't anything spectacular either. They were acceptable, which unfortunately isn't enough for an animated flick whose main medium to convey the protagonists emotion is facial expression and therefore fails. On the other hand there weren't that many emotional scenes. Actually I can think of only one: the one where one guy tells the other and vice versa what they believe sucks about their friendship. that's it - no death, no loss, nothing to choke you up or get you involved.

    The worst of the technical flaws, though is the downright bad or rather the lack of lip sync.

    I read some comments here on IMDB before I went to watch this film and therefore my attention was raised on this matter, maybe it biased my perception - but only for the first minutes. After that I was convinced that the head animator must have been blind. In a german movie I expect the german voice overs to be lip synced correctly. I mean you can even have a programm interpreting speech as lip movements and they do a decent job(Deus Ex 1 & 2 for example), but this was so totally off that it must have been on purpose. As it turns out well 15 minutes into the movie or so, one of the main protagonists says something in english and is perfectly in lip sync. From then on its clear that the facial animation was entirely done for english. You then could even read from the lips what they said. Well that's an answer but no excuse, as others already stated, Shrek for example has the "handicap" but does an excellent job. Though some of the voice actors aren't first rate, which leads to some poor voice acting at times (the princess for example). This is really unforgivable and really degrades the exprience.

    By the way, was I the only one who thought that "Buu" was cross-eyed?

    The story wasn't that great either. Not only was it uninteresting and predicatable but it just wasn't convincing at all. I mean the villains motivation was right out hilarious. Poor character development alongside with a strange pacing of events managed to keep you from getting drawn in. In Pixar movies the stories are always well thought of, structured in a logical, interesting way and you kinda know what they're trying to get at. Also the story is interesting enough to keep you going even if the visuals would suck. Here we have few to no jokes which aren't even funny and worse, no themes like love, fear or friendship are explored beyond a superficial level. Not that I'm expecting a great depth in a children's movie, yet some, at least convincing, plausible depth would is something I expect and certainly most children see it the same way.

    So this movie that has a medicore story some more or less severe animational issues, nevertheless it did enjoy it,and so will the audience for which it is intended.

    But if you are expecting something like Monster, Inc. keep looking for Shrek 2 or wait till this hits the shelf at your local video store.

    The only sad part to this movie is that all the dedication as well as hardwork the creators put in it show a potential which can be seen in glimpses throughout the movie is destroyed by the shortcomings of this movie. With a better script , better dialogue and more time to fine tune the animation as well as a fixed lip sync this movie could have been real good.

    Hopefully, the next time, the team who put this together will overcome these flaws mentioned above and once they accomplish this we're in for a real treat!
    5sempergumby

    Beautiful CG, BUT worse than a Saturday Morning Cartoon Story

    The Computer Graphic in this movie were sometimes sooo good that I kept trying to figure out how such quality effects were used in a movie with such terribly poor pacing, story, and plot. The quality of the scenes was often on par with Shrek or even Monsters Inc. I would watch a scene thinking this could be a professional studio doing this film (that I never heard of in mainstream media), then I would see the characters do a scene that would no longer pass as adequate in a Saturday Morning Special.

    Maybe it was the difficulty of working with CGI characters. Its possible that because the film was made in German and then English audio was dubbed that caused the audio track to be off throughout the film. I never realized how spoiled we've become with films like Toy Story, Shrek, Nemo, Antz, and so on. This film had several sweeping scenes that I thought could have been right out of any of those films, but then cut to action that could not have been in a storyboard for one of those films.

    Beautiful scenes, but lacks the wittiness and pacing that would allow an adult to enjoy this movie.
    hobold

    a few strengths and achievements, too

    The movie does have significant weaknesses, as the other comments point out, but there are a few strengths worthy of note.

    I was positively impressed by the global level of detail of scene backgrounds. Where in other CGI movies you get to see, say, a row of buildings with carefully modelled details near the camera, then a lot of empty space behind those, and finally a matte painting of the 'horizon', Back to Gaya shows you whole blocks of buildings, with the next streets showing through the gaps, all in credibly full detail, but without any obvious repetition of similar structures. To me these shots had a sense of realism that I had not seen before in CGI movies.

    Along the same vein, when there are open air views, the distant landscape is never a simple background painting, but a detailed model. As far as I can tell, even the clouds in the sky were actual 3D entities instead of the usual flat background painting. This gives the camera a lot more freedom to move large distances and freely look around the scenery. The filmmakers probably overused this freedom somewhat, though, making some scenes hard to follow.

    The outstanding level of detail extends to things like vegetation interacting with buildings, like plants growing inbetween and around fenceposts, for example. What I also liked was the general worn and aged look of things, a refreshing change from the polished featureless surfaces that are all too common on CGI movies' background objects.

    The character animation in comparison is two classes below that, as the other comments mention. One thing I like about the characters, though, is the courage of the designers to go for the outright bizarre with the 'human' roles. It was interesting to see character design exploring a different direction than the usual either hyperrealistic or more classical comic style.

    So, despite its weaknesses, Back to Gaya actually manages to advance the state of the CGI art on a few fronts. I do hope that it will be commercially successful enough that the makers get another chance to apply their talents to a better story.
    2jnaradzay

    An allegory that needs psychotherapy

    Let me start by saying that the animated movie Snurks. Back to Gaya should not be watched by children. Unless you want to explain why the mean little snurk calls people a "putz". Or why the movie is dark and dreary like a new Batman movie. In order to enjoy this movie you must understand that this is a religious allegory with a some very bad ethnic references, the requisite "a female can be a hero too" story line, and a cookie cutter plot.

    As far as a CG movie it is good. Not very good, but it has some terrific details. If you like to see pimples, pores, a stray nose hair, and blemishes then you will be impressed by the graphics. The bonus feature is kind of neat because you can watch how they build a skeleton, add "skin", texture, muscle movement, and facial features.

    Did I already state that this is not a movie for kids? The story involves a "creator" (Patrick "Jean Luc Picard"), a mythical land where good battles evil (Eden, er, Goya), the good guys need "the light", ("dalamite"). The dalamite gets stolen by an evil genius with a limp and (don't be shocked) a big, bald head!! Lemme explain: evil will take away the light and you have to find the creator to get it back. If you don't get it back then you will be a putz (they said it, not me). Explain that to your kids.

    Whose bright idea was it to give the poor little Snurks a shot glass filled with a Mickey? That's right, the Snurks get drugged by a tank-top wearing bar owner. I'm no censor but I know for a fact that cleavage does not belong in a kids movie.

    Just to keep adults interested, the artists have decided to show you lot of the barmaid's cartoon cleavage and sagging you-know-whats. I know for another fact that sagging you-know-whats do not belong in a kids movie. And the barmaid's male lackey gets yelled at, scolded, called a putz, then kicked in the head. Way too much violence.

    And they didn't miss a chance to make fun of fat people, short people, and anyone that looked different than heros. Sure, they had to cooperate to get back to Eden, er, Goya, but the snurk leader still had to bribe the "creator" to get equal treatment.

    And why does "666" keep popping up in the background? Did I like it? Not really. I wish I didn't see it with my kids. What a putz (their words, not mine) I am.

    Mehr wie diese

    Lissi und der wilde Kaiser
    5,1
    Lissi und der wilde Kaiser
    Das hässliche Entlein & ich
    5,3
    Das hässliche Entlein & ich
    Free Jimmy
    5,9
    Free Jimmy
    Highlander - Die Zeichentrickserie
    6,3
    Highlander - Die Zeichentrickserie
    Das hässliche Entlein & ich
    6,4
    Das hässliche Entlein & ich
    Codename: Emerald
    5,9
    Codename: Emerald
    Die Abenteuer von Wolfsblut
    6,9
    Die Abenteuer von Wolfsblut
    Ronal der Barbar
    6,5
    Ronal der Barbar
    Aftershock
    4,8
    Aftershock
    Stay Tuned - Mit der Fernbedienung in die Hölle
    6,3
    Stay Tuned - Mit der Fernbedienung in die Hölle
    Barbershop 2 - Krass frisiert!
    5,7
    Barbershop 2 - Krass frisiert!
    Psycho Goreman
    6,3
    Psycho Goreman

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      This was Michael Kamen's last score. He died before he could complete it, and his orchestrators filled out the unfinished sketches.
    • Crazy Credits
      In a scene during the credits, Galger calls Albert from a cellphone, to give him new ideas for writing further episodes for 'Zeck and Boo'.
    • Verbindungen
      Featured in Jambareeqi Reviews: Boo, Zino and the Snurks (2013)
    • Soundtracks
      No Small Wonder
      Words by Don Black

      Music by Michael Kamen

      Performed by Katy Krykant "Lady K", Andy Lewis, Bobby Harrison and Stefan Redtenbacher

      Produced, Mixed, and Arranged by Rupert Christie

      K-MAN CORP/SONY/ATV MUSIC PUBLISHING LLC (BMI)-50%

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ15

    • How long is Boo, Zino & the Snurks?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 18. März 2004 (Deutschland)
    • Herkunftsländer
      • Deutschland
      • Spanien
      • Vereinigtes Königreich
      • Brasilien
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Offizieller Standort
      • Warner Bros. (Germany)
    • Sprache
      • Deutsch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Zurück nach Gaya
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • Ambient Entertainment GmbH
      • Recorded Picture Company (RPC)
      • Morena Films
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Box Office

    Ändern
    • Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
      • 2.844.511 $
    Weitere Informationen zur Box Office finden Sie auf IMDbPro.

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 31 Min.(91 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • DTS
      • Dolby Digital EX
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 2.35 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.