Tatsächlich... Liebe

This movie does come off as a bit shallow, and it contains characters who are one- dimensional caricatures of themselves. But guess what -- this movie is clearly in the romantic, holiday fantasy genre -- just like It's a Wonderful Life and A Christmas Story are. And most people love those movies, so I don't get all the negative reviewing of this film. To me, this movie is clearly a fantasy piece, and as such it should not be subject to all the driveling negativity that would better be directed toward something terrible that masquerades as serious dramatic work. Would the British PM ever go knocking door to door with just one bodyguard? No Way! Do Londoners actually care what song is "number one for Christmas" more than Americans do?? (I'm seriously doubting it -- who other than a few teenagers and record promoters actually cares about charts?) This is clearly a work that's not to be taken as a "serious" movie, though it's seriously fun if you'll take it for the fantasy that it is.

I love this film. Despite the clearly fantastic story lines, I like the characters, and the amazing A-list cast does a great job. I caught it first in theatrical release, then I watched it three times back to back on a plane to London because the other choices were the abysmal "Cheaper by the Dozen" and "Duplex." Since I've caught it on HBO, and I've quickly realized it's one of those movies you can watch repeatedly when flipping channels for a quick "pick me up" that only fantasy movies can provide. My favorite movie of that sort is Groundhog Day, if that clues you into my argument.

The multi-threaded storytelling in this borrows from the likes of Magnolia, and the fact that it's a light hearted holiday theme flick place that device in interesting contrast.

I see Love Actually as a new holiday classic.

It's pretty cool to see London during Christmas. I didn't know they went all out with ice skating rinks and enormous trees. This movie is definitely self aware of it's humor and what it's doing. It's also very much British humor, definitely cheeky. It's crazy how stacked this movie is with so many great actors. Ok, Billy Bob Thornton as the President of the United States? - now I've seen it all lol. I loved Rowan Atkinson's cameo in this movie.

It's a funny, feel-good movie with a good heart. It leaves you with a warm cozy feeling inside. The movie is actually really funny at times. It also feels ridiculously campy and romanticized to the point where it feels like a fantasy. But I see it as sort of a cheeky jab at all the cheesy Hallmark movies lol. I noticed not all of the characters had happy rosy-tinted lives which was really refreshing to see. I actually appreciated how it kept things grounded in reality and made things feel a lot less fantasy and cheesy. The best part of the movie is seeing the different couples relationships and the things they're having to deal with. It was very well written, both with characters and story, and the movie went by very fast. Great movie!

Love actually is all around on Christmas. "Love, actually" is a very British comedy about love on Christmas, and the magic of Christmas and the spirit of Christmas. It's a really clever idea of having many small and completely different stories being the focus of this movie because love comes in different kinds. The clever thing is that somehow all these stories do interact woth each other but each and every one of them serves its own purpose. Emma Thompson I think speaks to the hearts of many women around the globe, and her performance is very poignant and raw and real. Hugh Grant's story is here to remind us of Clinton and Lewinsky. And Keira Knightley of course steals the hearts of many once again. Some very iconic scenes, some great pop-culture moments and a ridiculous song and performance by a great Bill Nighy. "Love, actually" is unapologetically British and absolutely ridiculous and bonkers and I love it. A perfect holiday movie.

I hate romantic comedies. I detest them. You can list the actors I avoid watching: Hugh Grant, Sandra Bullock, Richard Gere, Julia Roberts. Romantic comedies make me cringe and I avoid them like the plague so you can imagine the foul mood I was in when I was forced to watch this film.

And the introductory voice-over by Hugh Grant as we watch an airport full of people hugging made me want to commit an act of violence - either against the people who forced me to watch this film or against myself just to end the torture.

Then the most unbelievably shocking thing happened. Bill Nighy and Gregor Fischer came on screen, mocking one of the most hated love songs in Britain, "Love is all Around" and I found myself getting sucked into the film.

By the time I reached the end of the film I found myself facing the impossible, there was one romantic comedy out there that genuinely is a comedy and actually likeable. No-one was more shocked than I.

Many different kinds of love are covered (although not all kinds), there's 8 storylines and the biggest cast list I've seen in a long time. Somehow, it works. You'd think it wouldn't, I know I certainly didn't.

If you're looking for a full-length story, this is not the film for you. It snap-shots the important events leading to the resolution of the couples involved, nothing more. If you want a classic romantic film, this might not be the film for you. This is funnier than most straight comedies I've seen in recent times, however (I'm just as harsh a critic of comedy films as I am of romantic films).

It's not trying to be the meaning of life, it's not trying to look at the big picture. In fact, it's only trying to do one thing, and that's say positive feelings crop up in the most unexpected places or are more prevalent than people think. One of the storylines, one that is cited constantly in reviews as one of the failed storylines with a sad ending is actually bittersweet. It doesn't end with failure but the failure of one type of love in favour of a different kind.

This film isn't perfect, I'll never find the perfect romantic-comedy because I hate the genre so much, for example, one of the storylines did annoy me intensely and yet ironically still made me laugh in places. However, the flaws in the film are vastly outweighed by positives. It's superficially complicated but is really a very simple film. It makes a statement: "love actually is all around" then shows why it makes that statement and doesn't attempt to do or be anything else.

And like the fact it covers different kinds of love, it covers different attitudes and portrayals of it - so a couple are realistic, a couple are classic fantasy, a couple are pure comedy and a couple are pure rom-com tradition.

I have seen no reviewer give this film a middle-of-the-road review, and I've read many reviews. I think, in the end, Love Actually is up to the individual. It's like Marmite. You either love it or you hate it.

Speaking as a cynical, misanthropic, Marmite-hating, Romantic-Comedy hating member of the human race, I actually liked Love Actually.

After attending its premiere, Emma Thompson thought "Love Actually" was "kind of out there". Hugh Grant said to her," Is this the most psychotic thing we've ever been in?" And explained in later interviews that it was director and screenwriter " Richard Curtis on steroids." Grant added that " When he writes about love, he really means it ". That may be the secret behind the film becoming one of the most unlikely Christmas classics, a status purely created by the viewing audience, which has grown in both size and devotion over the years. I mean, who ever heard of an R-rated Christmas classic? The critics gave it mixed reviews and pointed out many flaws. But what the audience has responded to most is its obvious and authentic goodwill aided by some exceptional acting.

The film is guilty of many of the accusations hurled against it. It's long, it's complicated, it's overstuffed with music, situations, jokes, foul language and an enormous cast whose connections to each other are not always clear on first viewing, with nine love stories. There's married love, unrequited love, the love of friends, first love, stymied love, love at first sight and adolescent fantasy love. There's also infidelity, marital difficulties, gigantic shifts in tone and wildly improbable things happening all the time. The film puts you through a dizzying series of emotions. Though it is essentially light and full of funny moments, it also has scenes that are sad and even tragic, moments that will make you cringe and flawed characters making terrible decisions. In other words, it's a lot like humanity and thus a lot like the holiday season.

Curtis had a long career as one of Britain's top comic sketch and television writers often working with his friend from Oxford, Rowan Atkinson with whom he co-created the Mr. Bean character. He was the primary writer for some of Britain's most successful comedy series and when he began writing for movies, he broke through with "Four Weddings and a Funeral", following that with "Notting Hill"and "Bridget Jones's Diary". This is why he was able to attract this amazing cast of mostly British actors, most of whom had a large international following. One of the complaints of some critics was that such a cast should have been in a big, serious film and were wasted here. That seems like the old Hollywood tendency to ignore comedies at award time. It's this cast that makes the film happen and gives it so much emotional power.

The many involvements of love are tied together by the story of old rock star Billy Mack, wonderfully realized by Bill Nighy, attempting to make a comeback with the Troggs late 60's song. "Love Is All Around" by replacing "Love: with "Christmas". Within minutes of the film's start his release of a string of sailor's expletives tells you this is going to be no ordinary Christmas film. He constantly ruins the usual promotional gigs by speaking his mind about things, driving his manager, Joe (Gregor Fisher), totally crazy. The song's music video is a tribute and funny take on Robert Palmer's "Addicted To Love" and "Simply Irresistible" with their very 80s models. Billy would have probably been at his peak in the 80s but judging from the album covers and posters in his office and Joe's Motorhead T-shirt, he was a hard rocker. When they are not in a scene, their video and rising popularity on television are in the background.

The biggest stars have the most serious story. Alan Rickman and Emma Thompson are a happily married couple with two children. He is the head of a design agency and she's devoted herself to the children. She is also the sister of the new Prime Minister, David (Hugh Grant). Troubles arise for them when Rickman's Harry is tempted by new secretary Mia (German film star Heike Makatsch) who makes an overt play for him, seemingly just for a lark. Thompson's scene accompanied by Joni Mitchell's "Both Sides Now" (in her later, deep, smoky voiced version), is the most devastating moment in the film and one of Thompson's greatest as well.

Hugh Grant famously dancing around 10 Downing Street may have seemed an unlikely Prime Minister, but this was before Boris Johnson. Grant really didn't want to do that scene, thinking it unlikely for a P. M. but it turned out to be one of his most iconic and one still imitated by people all over the world. His search through Wandsworth for staff member Natalie (Martine McCutcheon) is one of the funniest extended scenes in the movie. Colin Firth is a writer who flees to France when his girlfriend is unfaithful, and falls in love with his Portuguese housekeeper, Amelia (Lucia Moniz) though there is a total language barrier between them. This was going to be a film as its own as was Hugh Grant's story and the merging of the two was the genesis of "Love Actually".

Daniel (Liam Neeson) and stepson Sam (Thomas Brodie-Sangster) are left alone after the death of Daniel's wife, and Daniel must try to connect with Sam, who seems to have totally withdrawn to his room. This turns into a romantic story for Sam, and provides one of the two entwined, orchestrated climaxes near the end of the film. I have some trouble with the story, largely because Sangster, though thirteen when he made the film, looks eight or nine to me (I mean, he was still playing a thirteen-year-old convincingly eight years later on "Game of Thrones"). He's a good actor and his seriousness as the character won me over in the end. Here, I also found the conversations between them a bit precocious, but perhaps that's just me. (Pay attention to who David mentions in his wife's eulogy).

A hidden love triangle exists between Juliet (Keira Knightly, Peter (Chiwetel Ejiofor) and Mark (Andrew Lincoln). One of the biggest of the establishing scenes is Peter and Juliet's wedding with Mark casually filming the proceedings. It includes a big musical moment that's one of the most totally fun parts of the film. (Look for director Curtis as one of the trombone players). Mark has been secretly in love with Juliet and has acted cold and unwelcoming so as not to complicate matters. This story also created a problem for me because though I believe Curtis intended Mark's actions to be sympathetic with some pathos, they instead make him look somewhat creepy. The front door scene, which is one of the best known,is not exempt from this but that's not what bothers me. If he brings his boombox and tells her to tell Paul "It's just carolers", shouldn't he be playing something that sounds like carolers? "Silent Night" is well sung but it doesn't sound at all like a group of acapella carolers. Maybe Peter is too far away to hear them.

Those are just some of the characters and stories, but I still have to comment on two of the lighter ones. Colin (Kris Marshall) is an unloved redheaded fellow having no luck finding a girl and gets a harebrained idea that if he flies to America, the girls will love his English accent. This develops in such an unreal way that you have to take it as a comic sketch based on adolescent boys' fantasies. It has no reasonable possibility in reality. John (Martin Freeman) and Judy (Joanna Page) are something else, however, as they provide completely unexpected nudity. It only exists to set up a joke, yet more than the infidelity and language in the rest of the film, it is unsuitable for some of the potential audience. First of all, they are stand-ins, not actors, who take the actors' spots and positions so the lighting and cameras can be set up in advance. This takes hours and actors won't do it, but as long as the stand-ins are around the same size and skin tone it works well. But what kind of film is this? It's very unlike the early 2000s and is more like the early 70s, when it seemed every film had to have scenes like this. I finally found an answer in an interview Curtis did. He said as a teenager, he often went to films to see the nude scenes and wanted to include it for that reason. And when was he a teenager? In the early to mid 70's. Its sketch-like nature allows it to be excerpted for some markets and though generally opposed to censorship, I prefer that more people be able to see the film.

In the whole it's no wonder that "Love Actually" has become such a hit with audiences and a Christmas classic in spite of itself. The film is epic in its way, drawing you into so many stories and situations and pulling your emotions this way and that. If you really get into it, it can be an exhausting experience. The Heathrow Airport scenes that open and close the film illustrate that love is, in fact, all around.