The Time Machine

When Victorian scientist Alexander Hartdegen sees his fiancé murdered during a petty robbery, he throws himself into his work while all even his closest friends know is that he is doing nonsense research and physics. Four years later though and Alexander has created his machine – a time machine – that he plans to use to return to the fateful night and save his true love. Somehow he cannot do it though and, in despair, he drives himself forward into the future to find progress beyond his wildest dreams. This progress though, comes with costs and risks – both of which Alexander is very aware of as he moves into a world where mankind has changed beyond all recognition.

This film was wildly derided when it came out in the cinemas and I never bothered to go and see it, preferring to let time pass and pick it up for free on television in a few years. That time came recently and I watched a version of HG Wells' Time Machine that is loosely based on the source material. It starts with potential but all too quickly it becomes obvious and surprisingly heartless – almost making a conscious decision that the effects will be what people come for and that doing a solid job on those will be enough. Sadly that is not the case but, were it, the effects are already superseded and do not look as impressive as they once may have done. With the humanity and the emotion built into the story, the delivery is quite stiff and dull and I found myself surprised by how little interest I had it the story even when I was far into it. Not totally sure where the problems lie with this but script is certainly one of them (some of the dialogue and exposition is terribly clunky) while the overall production did appear effects driven.

It is a shame because Guy Pearce frequently offers more from his performance and his potential but the film never really takes him up on it and it leaves him isolated, trying to be a character in a film that would seem to just prefer an action hero. Mumba looks good (if you ignore that at times her face is chimp-like, and no it is not racist to say so) but she cannot act for toffee – she didn't even run and scream all that convincingly. God knows what about the film made Irons decide to do his poor character but he is not alone as other famous faces such as Bloom and Addey show up.

The Time Machine is not the awful film that some say but it is just very heartless and dull. Some of the effects are good and the plot did have potential but the script and design never let this come out, seemingly more interested in visual bang-for-buck than they were about producing an effective and engaging story.

I first watchd this flm with my parents who, when rewatching it with me, felt so nostalgic. I didn't get that feeling obviously being younger, however I can tell how magical this film would have been to them previously because I felt it even now.

I really liked this film. I thought the great storyline of time travel and the sets I thought were amazing. The time machine itself as a prop and his I think its like a study or an office I thought was gorgeous in the way it looked.

Brilliant acting I thought from everyone, intersesting concepts and just overall a very enjoyable film to watch.

I strongly reccomend!

The four of us are in the 40 - 50 age range, and we are fairly tough what we like and do not like in films. It was Friday night and we wanted entertainment. We read the comments below - mostly, but not all negative - and decided to take a gamble. Arriving at the cinema, we were prepared for a bad movie but hoping for 'a good relaxing time'. Well, we *did* like this film! Not a top box office smash or even an 8 out of 10, but entertaining nevertheless. The MUSIC was superb. ACTING was fine. HISTORIC life portrayed in old Cambridge Massachusetts was realistic - even the snow and cold weather was real. The ROMANCE was acceptable. The STORY, while not closely following H G Well, was good enough. The SPECIAL EFFECTS were very good indeed. It is worth a gamble, to see this film. But go with a light heart and an acceptable frame of mind, and keep your expectations below that of a 10 out of 10 film.

Alexander Hartdegen (Guy Pearce) is a scientist living in 1899 NYC. He proposes to his girlfriend Emma, but she's killed in a robbery. Four years later, he builds a time machine. However when he tries going back to rescue Emma, she is killed in a different way. Disenchanted, he travels forward in time to 2030 to search for a way to change the past. However he finds nothing about time travel. He jumps forward another 7 years to find the world in collapse and chaos after the moon is destroyed. He tries to use his time machine again but an explosion knocks him out. The machine keeps running until 802,701 AD when he regains consciousness.

The movie works well for awhile, but the future world of Eloi and Morlock is a bit of a letdown. It takes the H. G. Wells world and makes a Planet of the Apes movie out of it. In the end, the well-made movie is let down by this. Also there is an uncompelling action ending. The movie just has nothing profound to say, and is a barely functional action movie.

Well written and produced film , it is an acceptable rendition from H. G. Wells novel . In fact , a picture of H. G. Wells is watchable in starring's house in various shots . Before being filmed by George Pal/Byron Haskin with nice protagonists as Rod Taylor , Sebastian Cabot , Whit Bissel, and Alan Young who has a tiny role in this 2002 second version . Here the star results to be Guy Pearce who gives a good interpretation . The film deals with time travel because his girlfriend -played by Sienna Guillory- has been killed and Guy Pearce invents a device in which tries to go back in time with the aim to reborn her . His travel machine to transport him within the dimensions of time and ahead for a future world . But the time travel machine is occasionally got frustrated when he wasn't allowed to go the appointed place and he was ahead at future world where the brutish Morlocks inhabit and rule over the good Eloi . There Guy Pearce lives dangerous and frustrating experiences . As he travels forward into time , it reveals a dark and dangerous society. 0 to 800,000 years in 1.2 seconds. Where Would You Go? The Future Awaits . Jump-Start the Future . Be Careful What You Wish For . The greatest adventure through all time! .He was searching for the answer to his past. He became a hero for the future.

This exciting movie mingles noisy adventures , franctic action , a love story , drama , breathtaking special effects and it results to be entertaining enough . The release was modified to a subsequent date because of a decision whether to change a scene involving a visible meteor shower which fell on New York . The financers were concerned that such a scene may stir records of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center . Filmmaker provides an interesting and adequate adaptation by prestigious screen-writer John Logan , co-producer too , who equally wrote the Eloi language .

Guy Pearce stars the main role giving a cool acting , he even did most of his own stunts . In fact , Guy Pearce broke a rib and suffered wounds during the shooting when he tackled the Morlock from the side . The support cast is agreeable , singer Samantha Mumba is nice in his film debut , Mark Addy is fine , Jeremy Irons plays an incredible villain person and Orlando Jones delivers a humorous acting , as always . The cinematography by cameraman Donald McAlpine and musical score by composer Klaus Badlet are excellent , direction by Simon Welles (H. G. Wells'descendant) is first-rate . However , Gore Verbinski was brought in to take over the last twenty days of shooting , as Simon Wells was suffering from real exhaustion and extreme stress ; later on , Wells went back for post-production . The creation of the Morlocks were created by three companies : Industrial Light & Magic made digital versions of the Hunters when they run and performing heavy action , KNB Effects Group provided the make-up effects , and Stan Winston Studios created the spy Morlocks and the evil hunter Morlocks .Rating : 7 , entertaining and charming remake . Better than average , the picture contains all the ingredients that make it a fun Sci-fi movie . It's still highly amusing and maintains its sense of wonder.