Die Schande des Regiments

"Conduct Unbecoming" is a sort of thriller settled in a British regiment in colonial India. The widow of a heroic officer is assaulted by an unrevealed comrade in arms and an investigation takes place.

In my opinion, though not a classic and not even perhaps a great movie, this film is a most interesting product for those of us who enjoy "who did it?" movies. It takes place in a most original environment and its substance increases with subjects like military honor, loyalty, camaraderie and cowardice.

The cast is perfect and another highlight in the film with very convincing performances from Trevor Howard (as usual), Cristopher Plummer, Richard Attenborough, Michael York, Susanah York and always reliable James Donald in a minor role.

I'm sure that with a more imaginative and strong director than Michael Anderson (Stanley Kubrick, John Frankenheimer just to name a couple), this could have been a great film, nearly a classic).

But nonetheless, "Conduct Unbecoming" stands as a fine piece of entertainment in its genre and surely is worth a watch.

Two new second lieutenants join the regiment in the Indian army: Michael York and James Faulkner. York is idealistic and hopes to make a brilliant career. Faulkner is there because his father was in the regimentt and it's expected of him. He hopes to serve the minimum amount of time and get on with his life back in England. The prospects are not good. Under the command of its colonel, Trevor Howard, it's hide-bound, ritual stuffed, with constant talk about the honor of the regiment, and new lieutenants are to be seen and not heard. Millington doesn't care. He talks out loud and makes advances to Susannah York. She's the widow of a regimental hero who was killed in the field, and his uniform and VC are on display. So when she accuses Millington of attacking her in the garden, there's talk of a court martial. But that would reflect on the honor of the regiment, so a subaltern's court is convened, unofficial and just as binding. York is to defend Millington; his work is expected to be pro forma, but he mounts an actual defense. Stacy Keach, who's in charge of the court keeps trying to shut him down. But the stories begin to leak....

It's all spit and polish in the performances, with some major talent on view, including Richard Attenborough, Christopher Plummer, and James Donald stiff-upper-lipping their way through their roles. It's based on an award winning play by the appropriately named Barry England. While it's opened up nicely for the big screen, some of the staging comes through, particularly in Miss York's performance.

Certainly excellent acting by an excellent cast. Its only boring if you don't understand the time, place and principles. This is hard to do in the 21st century. Honor, loyalty and comradeship are rare commodities today, not really highly valued or understood. That makes this film all the more worth watching and pondering. To be a common man in a position of such infallibility is beyond imagination today, but such were the colonial British in the Victorian era. I find this story absolutely fascinating and Stacy Keatch's performance as the only American in the film one of his best. Acting, writing, directing and beautiful color, I loved it. I'm grateful its finally on DVD.

Despite the pretty stellar cast list, I struggled a bit with this rather dreary story. It centres around James Faulkner's "Lt. Millington" who is being court-martialled in British India for a serious assault on the widow of a fallen colleague - "Mrs. Scarlett" (Susannah York). He is to be defended by the inexperienced "Drake" (Michael York) before a committee chaired by the openly hostile "Capt. Harper" (Stacey Keach). On the face of it, he is doomed - but some tenacious investigative work from his counsel gradually gets to the bottom of what happened. The ending is more of a sort of guess which of the other famous actors - Trevor Howard, Richard Attenborough or perhaps Christopher Plummer might have done it given we are pretty safe to assume that poor old "Millington" is being stitched up. Sadly, this moves at a glacial pace with none of the characters offering much by way of depth or interest. Colourful? Yes, that's true - and the costumes and settings all look great, but like so many of these latter-day tales of Empire, it is all faintly ridiculous and swings clumsily at the supposed honour of the "regiment" at all costs in quite a shallow fashion. I found the direction was much more suitable for a theatrical delivery, too. Disappointing.

This film is flat lifeless and dull.It t staged in one main set and it gives the feeling of having been filmed in the theatre.It is not so much a whodunit as a whocareswhodunnit.When the actual assailant is revealed the only feeling is of relief that this film is coming to a conclusion.Terence Rattigan was apparently paid £250000 for an unused screenplay.That was probably more than the test of the films budget.