Kannappa
- 2025
- 3 Std. 3 Min.
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAn atheist hunter Kannappa becomes a devotee of Lord Shiva and plucked out his eyes in an act of devotion.An atheist hunter Kannappa becomes a devotee of Lord Shiva and plucked out his eyes in an act of devotion.An atheist hunter Kannappa becomes a devotee of Lord Shiva and plucked out his eyes in an act of devotion.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This was the worst of all in 2025 till now, man how dis the makers even thought we would love it. OMG don't talk about graphics it was really poor, but it's not just graphics the film itself lacks your interest. Man I wasn't expecting it to be this bad. It's the actors bad but the way this movie directed is really useless, I think even the new cindrella remake was better than this. Why are they are the makers nowadays so obssessed with mythology and even they want to make pls make it clear and with less vulgarity, I just wasted my 3 hours and some mental health after watching this masterpiece.
A great cast, a poor screenplay and a disastrous storyline is what brings Kanappa together.
The future generation of Manchu family (Vishnu's kuds) are introduced in the first 10 minutes. Sharat kumar, Mohanlal, Brahmanandam could have done better roles.
The casting is a big minus. Especially Akshay Kumar for Shiva, Vishnu for Thinnada
The direction was oppressed by the senior actors esp Mohan babu, when his character wins some sense until Prabhas/Rudra comes to the screen. Acting is surely an understatement.
The movie flatters boredom right from the start as the script lacked conviction. It was more a natural tour of New Zealand.
Srikalahasti is a legendary tale, they should have focused more on that. But when amateur directors are welcomed, this is what we get best.
The future generation of Manchu family (Vishnu's kuds) are introduced in the first 10 minutes. Sharat kumar, Mohanlal, Brahmanandam could have done better roles.
The casting is a big minus. Especially Akshay Kumar for Shiva, Vishnu for Thinnada
The direction was oppressed by the senior actors esp Mohan babu, when his character wins some sense until Prabhas/Rudra comes to the screen. Acting is surely an understatement.
The movie flatters boredom right from the start as the script lacked conviction. It was more a natural tour of New Zealand.
Srikalahasti is a legendary tale, they should have focused more on that. But when amateur directors are welcomed, this is what we get best.
Not worth👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻. 99% of the audience are Prabhas fans and that 20 mins of Prabhas screen presence is good other than that nothing great. Not a great writing, direction and screen play. The budget they put to make this movie is not justified at all. First half of the movie is not even worth 5 mins. Last 20mins of the movie is okay
Wait for OTT if you really want to watch.
Director-1.5/5 BGM-2/5 Screenplay-1/5 Prabhas as Rudra-3.5/5 Mohan babu acting-3/5 Akshay kumar-3/5 Other actors-2/5 Vishnu-1/5
Story-1/5 better to watch the Original Bhakta Kannapa movie.
Big budget movie but lacks in every aspects.
Wait for OTT if you really want to watch.
Director-1.5/5 BGM-2/5 Screenplay-1/5 Prabhas as Rudra-3.5/5 Mohan babu acting-3/5 Akshay kumar-3/5 Other actors-2/5 Vishnu-1/5
Story-1/5 better to watch the Original Bhakta Kannapa movie.
Big budget movie but lacks in every aspects.
Seems like the movie is dubbed using Google translater. Some scenes copied from bahubali, some from 2013 Mahabharat serial, poorly written dialogues. Bad costume choice for actress. Example of how too much budget can spoil a movie.
Such a big cast and none of them do justice. Akshay as Lord Shiva doesn't do justice. Worse is Kajal playing Maa Parvati. Unnecessary romantic angle and projected vulgarity. Some scenes are literally cringe. With this much budget they could have done better VFX, the two eyes showing on lingam could have been projected better.
Though VFX is not as bad as Adipurush 😀. At least forest is green.
Such a big cast and none of them do justice. Akshay as Lord Shiva doesn't do justice. Worse is Kajal playing Maa Parvati. Unnecessary romantic angle and projected vulgarity. Some scenes are literally cringe. With this much budget they could have done better VFX, the two eyes showing on lingam could have been projected better.
Though VFX is not as bad as Adipurush 😀. At least forest is green.
Such a horrible screenplay if anyone values 3 hours pf valuable time refea8n from the movie . Story telling is at the lowest no proper BGM, cheap graphics . Hero has built body eating too much of meat but not investiled time to sharpen his acting skills. Expressions are horrible . Only saviour is 15 mins of prabhas. Better to watch it on OTT moving fast forward button.
I need my 3 hours of vaouable time back wasted my life trustong this horrible movie makers not worth watching....
Location is out of sync to movie, the primary focus is lost in story telling by director. Ecpressionless cast except prabhas.
Dont waste time.
I need my 3 hours of vaouable time back wasted my life trustong this horrible movie makers not worth watching....
Location is out of sync to movie, the primary focus is lost in story telling by director. Ecpressionless cast except prabhas.
Dont waste time.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 147.428 $
- Laufzeit3 Stunden 3 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen