The Actor

Am gob smacked by seeing so many 10 / 10 reviews so have watched film and offer my realistic rating.

Shame in 2024 society of now, certain people choose to lie, attempt to create a perceived image - using multiple fake awesome 10/10 reviews.

Make a movie, put it out there, allow the audience to review.

These choose to pull wool over eyes, in my opinion this is very poor character so shall avoid if sadly see their names producing anywhere again.

The film, 2 hours could be an hour long. Unneeded scenes stretched, included.. The script - basic to average would be a compliment.

Characters - some acceptable performances, some border line good Sadly the flow and script - more annoying than entertaining, for me.

I'm not a movie critic. But, I do know a bad movie when I see it. This movie is BAD. It's one of the worst I've seen in a long time. Terrible writing, subpar acting, nonsensical pacing, etc. It's worse than a student film. How did this even get made?

Don't trust the other reviews. Believe in the overall rating (3.2/10 at the time of this writing). Save two hours of your life and go watch something else. Anything else. You'll thank me for it.

I know my review sounds harsh. But, I won't apologize for my honest thoughts. Viewers need to be made aware so they don't have to go through what I suffered through.

I am not a film critic, but I think back on the days of Siskel and Ebert. In my opinion Siskel looked at movies from a critic's perspective, while Ebert viewed them as a lover of film, entertainment - and that's how I look at films.

In my opinion, "The Actor" is a very good film. Richard Blake is the writer/director and played the lead role (Hunter) - and did an amazing job!

The performances are on point as the story progresses, it pulls you in more and more, with each actor bringing their character to life in a compelling way. The storyline is rich and engaging, keeping viewers on the edge of their seats from start to finish. The cinematography is stunning, capturing the essence of each scene beautifully. Overall, "The Actor" is a great film that leaves a lasting impression and is a must-watch for any cinema lover.

As a good film should it leaves you wanting and waiting for a sequel!

For the love of all things film, can you and your other fellow "I can do it all" combo writer/actor/directors stop producing garbage like this that does nothing but inflate your ego and pay you more $ because of multiple credit titles?

Why can you not do one thing and do it well?

Repeat this every morning when you awaken.

Writers should ONLY write.

Actors should ONLY act.

Directors should ONLY direct.

Please stop producing such silly movies like this, and stop having all your friends give you 9 and 10 points when you yourself know its a 4 at best.

Do not write act and produce all at one, all that does is fan the flames of your I can do it all ego!

"The Actor" is a very indie independent film. I have worked on a short film where the writer was the director and producer, and I know how a film like this can be put together on a shoestring budget. It's fun, actually.

First, there are many things to like about "The Actor." I really like the initial film casting scene where the lead character, Hunter, is reading for a role in a movie. It quickly becomes clear that Hunter is reluctant to drop all the "f-bombs" that are in the script, despite the casting agent repeatedly encouraging him. This scene feels pretty real to me, and I enjoyed it. I also like that there are real actors who are reluctant to use rough language, even when there are big incentives on the line. Hunter has principles, and that shines through.

Then a big pile of money falls into Hunter's lap and he goes on the lam to keep a step ahead of the bad guys. This involves a lot of bad acting all around, but there are some moments of fun. Again, Hunter is a decent guy and he doesn't want to actually hurt anyone. The big action scene where the bad guys are dealt with is not as gory as it could be, and there is a dash of "Home Alone" mixed into the action. Then, unfortunately, the final scene is repeated from the beginning of the film, and it left me with a "Why did they do that?" feeling. Either show it at the beginning or show it at the end, but don't show it twice. And the ending was rather open-ended... but I won't say more.

I liked much of "The Actor," but it was definitely too long. There were multiple scenes where Hunter interacted with women (gym, restaurant, church) that were just too long, and these moments added nothing to the film. Cut 95% of each scene out and you'd never miss the rest. The intro credits were a marvelously edited montage that was nothing like the rest of the film -- cut that out and just get into the movie.

Overall, there were a few things I liked about "The Actor" and a few things I didn't like. But it was a good script that needed some tightening. It is refreshing to see a good guy who is forced to go on the run, who then handles himself with modesty and a sense of fairness. And I really like the initial lesson about language -- there are far too many f-bombs in films, and this one shows that others out there agree with me. That said, "The Actor" is rated for mature audiences (consider it an R-rating) because of rough language.