IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,8/10
9094
IHRE BEWERTUNG
In dem Bestreben, zu vermeiden, eine massive Spielschuld an einen berüchtigten Gangster in England zu zahlen, flieht ein Paar nach Los Angeles und schlüpft in eine Handlung über Juwelenraub.In dem Bestreben, zu vermeiden, eine massive Spielschuld an einen berüchtigten Gangster in England zu zahlen, flieht ein Paar nach Los Angeles und schlüpft in eine Handlung über Juwelenraub.In dem Bestreben, zu vermeiden, eine massive Spielschuld an einen berüchtigten Gangster in England zu zahlen, flieht ein Paar nach Los Angeles und schlüpft in eine Handlung über Juwelenraub.
Richard Alan Reid
- Bell Boy
- (as Richard Reid)
Philip Pavel
- Hotel Manager
- (as Phil Pavel)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Where to begin. The opening credits were lifted from Catch Me if You Can and Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. It fails to capture the essence of either.
Within the first 10 minutes of the movie, half of which are title sequence, you become quickly aware that the editing was created by Stevie Wonder's stand in, Blind Freddie.
Blind Freddie is actually only 10 years old and suffers from narcolepsy, evidence of which can be seen in the panning shots which are supposed to create a segway to the next scene but linger way too long.
The acting is, for the want of a better term, dire. It is quite clear that most of the actors are low on cash and have done a turn for a quick injection in their pocket books, which only helps to seal the fate of this abomination.
I liked most of the actors in this movie prior to seeing it, now their credibility along with my admiration have dispersed quicker than a whale turd.
Whoever suggested this is a movie to stick at an enjoy, or the viewer has to work to enjoy, must be from the cast, crew, family or financiers. Truly awful suggestion.
Despite the fact the main characters are actors I usually like, the movie itself is a disaster. The plot seemed kind of interesting at the beginning, it presented some good elements, cars, houses, beautiful photography and beautiful location but everything was just superficial and the characters' storyline doesn't get deeper, real nor interesting.
The script seems messy and the action is going nowhere.
I got bored halfway through it and still expected something interesting to happen but there wasn't a single interesting moment during the 90 minutes of the movie. It lacks consistency and purpose.
This is a strange and disappointing film.
I think this was supposed to be a crime caper but it fails miserably.
Considering the strong acting pedigree of the cast I was surprised that the characters were so one-dimensional. This did nothing for the story or production whatsoever. A character did 'x' - and mostly only 'x'. That was it.
This film isn't worth wasting your time on, and considering it has taken three years to be released perhaps it should have stayed in some archive never to have seen the light of day.
I think this was supposed to be a crime caper but it fails miserably.
Considering the strong acting pedigree of the cast I was surprised that the characters were so one-dimensional. This did nothing for the story or production whatsoever. A character did 'x' - and mostly only 'x'. That was it.
This film isn't worth wasting your time on, and considering it has taken three years to be released perhaps it should have stayed in some archive never to have seen the light of day.
There's a great script here struggling to get out. Alas, it fails to even open the door.
Writer/director! When will producers learn!? I'm guessing Never so we continue to be plagued by these half-a**ed screenplays that desperately need a 2nd or 3rd eye to curb the writer's sense of brilliance! (That's irony for our American friends.)
Let's start with the title. It's not a movie about a con. Jesus! C'mon guys, at least get the terminology right. It's more a sort of comedy caper/heist movie, but it's not even that.
The worst character by far is Tim Roth's Peter. No doubt Roth enjoyed playing him although it would be as challenging as waking up in the morning. He's so lacking in couth it's absolutely impossible to imagine he could ever have gotten involved with Alice Eve or Uma Thurman, zany and cracked though their characters may be.
Maggie Q must have had a similar challenge with her character.
Highlight of the movie is Stephen Fry playing, well, Stephen Fry's "Dear boy" character, but he does it so naturally and so well. Although not a major character he does help redeem it from the pit.
It's not totally unwatchable. Well, if you're looking for a good plot or well-defined characters or well, anything, then it is...
Okay, it has good production values and a stellar cast but they're simply wasted, wasted, wasted.
I didn't think it was quite as bad as other reviews suggest which I find hard to believe! But it is extremely disappointing.
Writer/director! When will producers learn!? I'm guessing Never so we continue to be plagued by these half-a**ed screenplays that desperately need a 2nd or 3rd eye to curb the writer's sense of brilliance! (That's irony for our American friends.)
Let's start with the title. It's not a movie about a con. Jesus! C'mon guys, at least get the terminology right. It's more a sort of comedy caper/heist movie, but it's not even that.
The worst character by far is Tim Roth's Peter. No doubt Roth enjoyed playing him although it would be as challenging as waking up in the morning. He's so lacking in couth it's absolutely impossible to imagine he could ever have gotten involved with Alice Eve or Uma Thurman, zany and cracked though their characters may be.
Maggie Q must have had a similar challenge with her character.
Highlight of the movie is Stephen Fry playing, well, Stephen Fry's "Dear boy" character, but he does it so naturally and so well. Although not a major character he does help redeem it from the pit.
It's not totally unwatchable. Well, if you're looking for a good plot or well-defined characters or well, anything, then it is...
Okay, it has good production values and a stellar cast but they're simply wasted, wasted, wasted.
I didn't think it was quite as bad as other reviews suggest which I find hard to believe! But it is extremely disappointing.
Managed 40 minutes of this before I turned it off. Bad acting, terrible accents and definitely not funny.
I normally like Tim Roth and Uma Thurman and Maggie Q was good in designated survivor, but this is one of the worst movies I have seen in a long time.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe film completed filming in 2015, but took three years to receive a theatrical release.
- PatzerThey are in room #64, but there are only 63 rooms in the Chateau Marmont.
- VerbindungenReferences Reservoir Dogs - Wilde Hunde (1992)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Con is On?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- The Brits Are Coming - Diamanten-Coup in Hollywood
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 13.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 221.359 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 35 Min.(95 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen