[go: up one dir, main page]

Nataliya's Reviews > Brave New World

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3672777
's review

liked it
bookshelves: 2012-reads

Brave New World is a classic written to make its readers uncomfortable. It accomplishes its point well. Still, it is only getting 3 stars from me, as I rate books based on my personal level of enjoyment rather than literary value.

The characters of this book were not meant to be likeable - I am fine with that concept. The first few chapters made me want to curl up in the corner and cry - that's how repulsive the design of this universe was (mission accomplished, Mr. Huxley). But as we plunge into the depths of the neverending moral message of the story (basically the entire last third of the book), I felt my patience stretching thin. I get the message, no need to beat me over the head with it.

I did chuckle at the ridiculous consumerism of this world (inspired by America of the turn of the century) in which, unexpectedly, most characters have distinct socialist names - Lenina, Trotsky, Marx, Bernard (as in G.B.Shaw). I just think it's funny how both of the enemies of Huxley's ideal world - the competing ideologies of socialism and rampant consumerism - were dealt with in one blow. Good try - but come on!

I liked the description of the effects of soma drug on the mind. No wonder, as this was written by the author of The Doors of Perception about mescaline effects on the mind - an interesting read, by the way.

Of the classic trio of dystopian books (this one, Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Zamyatin's We) this one is my least favorite (We is the best, in my opinion, and may have actually inspired this one). Brave New World succeeds at portraying dystopia at its worst and making the reader think, but stilted language and moral heavy-handedness take away from the enjoyment. Yet it's a classic, and should be read, even if not for fun. 3 stars.
256 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Brave New World.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

March 2, 2012 – Shelved
March 3, 2012 – Started Reading
March 3, 2012 –
page 45
15.63% "This book makes me want to curl up in a ball in the corner and cry..."
March 4, 2012 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Arsalan ale your personal point of view so much corresponds to my literary evaluation :))


Nataliya Arsalan wrote: "your personal point of view so much corresponds to my literary evaluation :))"

Great minds think alike? ;)


Arsalan ale Nataliya wrote: "Arsalan wrote: "your personal point of view so much corresponds to my literary evaluation :))"

Great minds think alike? ;)"


haha yes but with a little difference! i gave 2 stars and you gave 3


Nataliya Arsalan wrote: "Nataliya wrote: "Arsalan wrote: "your personal point of view so much corresponds to my literary evaluation :))"

Great minds think alike? ;)"

haha yes but with a little difference! i gave 2 stars ..."


Well, yeah, but in the end it seems that neither of us was terribly impressed by it.


Shannyn I felt the same way about the last 1/3 or so of the book. Too much redundant ideology and focus on just 1 or 2 of the characters.


Tracey Madeley As a contrasting opinion I thought Brave New World was incredible. Yes, it is very ideological and political and if you don't like that sort of thing I can understand you loosing patience with it.
i thought the gentic manipulation of IQ was shocking, the subliminal conditioning and disengagement frightening and the banning of books appauling. The price of stability being freedom.
Equally the reservation sufferred from primative superstitions and prejudice.
Surely the point of a dystopian novel is to inspire you to change society before it's too late. All Post Modernists will tell you there are no more meta-narratives (big ideas) that all ideology is redundant in this fragmented, globalized world and don't forget to take your soma.


message 7: by Geoff (new)

Geoff I really like your review. Have you checked out leebrii.com? It's a streamlined approach to connecting people & books. It would be great to have you join the community.


Nataliya Geoff wrote: "I really like your review. Have you checked out leebrii.com? It's a streamlined approach to connecting people & books. It would be great to have you join the community."

Thanks, Geoff. And no - I have never even heard of that site; but in all honesty, I think trying to keep up with just one book site is taking up quite a bit of my limited time, so I think I'll just stick with GR for now.


message 9: by Geoff (new)

Geoff Awesome, keep on reviewing!!


Nataliya Geoff wrote: "Awesome, keep on reviewing!!"

Will do ;)


message 11: by Rafael (new) - rated it 5 stars

Rafael Corvera burciaga I liked -and agree with- your review, there were parts on the book in which i felt angered, on other parts i felt absolutely disgusted by them. And the characters! none of them are likeable.
But i really liked the story though.


Nataliya Rafael wrote: "I liked -and agree with- your review, there were parts on the book in which i felt angered, on other parts i felt absolutely disgusted by them. And the characters! none of them are likeable.
But i ..."


Thanks, Raphael!


message 13: by Tommy (new) - rated it 4 stars

Tommy Walker I was a bit disturbed at times at the unlikability of The Savage, in view of my sneaking suspicion that I was supposed to like him, violence and all.


message 14: by Mohsen (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mohsen Mgr It did not make me uncomfortable. Maybe in the 30s but now its not so controversial.


message 15: by Michael (new) - rated it 4 stars

Michael Perkins It truly is a weird book and tough to get through. I think it's main contribution is certain concepts, for example as shown in this comment by Neil Postman, who wrote a book some 30 years ago about the downside of TV, titled "Amusing Ourselves to Death."

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7942...


message 16: by Georgia (new) - added it

Georgia Mcmayon agreed


bittersweet tea You put well into words how I felt about the book ("written to make its readers uncomfortable"); the beginning actually made me so uncomfortable that I had to drop it. (Some things are better not to be visualized.)


Alejandro Ortiz I agree with this so much because it really did make me uncomfortable and I did not enjoy the book as much as I wish I could have; I usually like to enjoy classic novels because most of them live up to expectations. I did not expect much from this book and before reading it I had no idea what it was even about. The comment is right about Huxley attacking socialism and consumerism with one blow, among other issues with society such as promiscuity. He exaggerates the issues he includes in his novel to make readers feel disgusted by them and it shows Huxley’s frame of mind. He was probably dissatisfied by life and all the things that were going on around him. Brave New World does indeed make me feel like dystopias are outrageous and should never happen. Thank you, Huxley, for making me feel grossed out for your entire 270-page novel. I will be sure to not read another book written by you and anything having to do with dystopias.


message 19: by Peter (new) - rated it 4 stars

Peter Tillman Arsalan: seeing your name (or screen-name)-- I presume you have read "Arslan" by MJ Engh?


PyranopterinMo As someone who found himself having to read this book out loud I am aiming to one star it for taking a very interesting idea and turning it into an exercise of showing off at the expense of the reader. That said, the name Benito Hoover, well, I am ROLFing. The colorful and brutal showman and dictator ; the colorless ngineer president who is now forgotten for his effort to feed the Belgians after WW1 (I think he also offered to help in the Ukraine a bit later.)


Nataliya PyranopterinMo wrote: "As someone who found himself having to read this book out loud I am aiming to one star it for taking a very interesting idea and turning it into an exercise of showing off at the expense of the rea..."

I’m so curious - why are you reading it out loud?


PyranopterinMo I am on a Discord server whose purpose is to help students practice whatever languages they are learning with native speakers and fellow students. the students are supposed to do the reading but we ended up taking turns. The book was not my choice, I am reading from project Gutenberg or library samples of authors that I like like F.H.


Nataliya PyranopterinMo wrote: "I am on a Discord server whose purpose is to help students practice whatever languages they are learning with native speakers and fellow students. the students are supposed to do the reading but we..."

Alright, that makes sense. I hope your next project there will be a book you like more.


Nataliya Borders Are Global Apartheid wrote: "All I can remember from this book is that sex and drugs are bad apparently. The rest is a blur of boring."

I can’t even remember that much at this point — this book expunged itself from my memory. If not this review from 2012, I would remember a thing about it.


back to top