Yun's Reviews > Brave New World
Brave New World
by
by
I first read Brave New World many years (decades) ago in high school, and I remember thinking it was really interesting at the time. Well, I must have been a doofus back then because this reread just didn't live up to expectations. To be honest, my impression now is that it's all a bit of a mess.
First, who exactly are the main characters here? We start following a few people, but end up focusing on someone else entirely. None of the characters are particularly sympathetic, not even the supposedly enlightened "savage" man from outside this world. And this savage man, even though he had a bit of homeschooling in the middle of nowhere, can converse on a superior level with the Controller of Western Europe upon meeting him. (Cue eye-rolling.)
The story relies heavily on Shakespeare quotes to make its point, often devolving into random ramblings for pages at a time. In a whole chapter devoted to discussions on religion, it clearly implies that turning one's back on religion causes a society to melt down into dystopia. (More eye-rolling.)
And on top of that, the part that annoys me the most is its treatment of the female main character. The "savage" calls her a whore every time he feels attracted to her and goes so far as to physically attack her, since it's obviously her fault for tempting him. I know this was written in the 1930s, so maybe this sort of rape-culture thinking was the norm back then, but it doesn't make reading it now any less offensive.
I'll be generous and give it 3 stars for being a classic with some interesting ideas about dystopian society. But if I were to rank it against books out there today, it's not worth more than 2 stars. Womp womp.
First, who exactly are the main characters here? We start following a few people, but end up focusing on someone else entirely. None of the characters are particularly sympathetic, not even the supposedly enlightened "savage" man from outside this world. And this savage man, even though he had a bit of homeschooling in the middle of nowhere, can converse on a superior level with the Controller of Western Europe upon meeting him. (Cue eye-rolling.)
The story relies heavily on Shakespeare quotes to make its point, often devolving into random ramblings for pages at a time. In a whole chapter devoted to discussions on religion, it clearly implies that turning one's back on religion causes a society to melt down into dystopia. (More eye-rolling.)
And on top of that, the part that annoys me the most is its treatment of the female main character. The "savage" calls her a whore every time he feels attracted to her and goes so far as to physically attack her, since it's obviously her fault for tempting him. I know this was written in the 1930s, so maybe this sort of rape-culture thinking was the norm back then, but it doesn't make reading it now any less offensive.
I'll be generous and give it 3 stars for being a classic with some interesting ideas about dystopian society. But if I were to rank it against books out there today, it's not worth more than 2 stars. Womp womp.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Brave New World.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 19, 2017
–
Started Reading
August 19, 2017
– Shelved
August 20, 2017
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 76 (76 new)
message 1:
by
Lee
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
18 fév. 2020 00:36
reply
|
flag
Thanks for your comment and for stopping by, Lee! Yes, there was a lot that didn't work for me in this book, and it sounds like it's the same for you. It's always a disappointment when a classic doesn't turn out as stellar as I'd hoped.
and I remember thinking it was really interesting at the time
but now I found it rather annoying
and I remember thinking it was really interesting at the time
but now I found it rather annoying"
Haha! Glad it's not just me, Mikey! I wonder what made me think it was interesting when I originally read it all those years ago.
Thanks, Chantel! Yep, glad you felt similarly! I feel like the reading we did in school does a disservice in a lot of ways. Often we were reading classics for classics sake, without really assessing whether the books are still good or relevant to today.
Thanks, Baba! I can definitely see how this could be interesting when it was published. But it's hard for me as a modern reader to relate to that... though that's an issue I have with a lot of "classics", not just this one.
Haha! I did a reread of 1984 recently and enjoyed that one a lot more. :)
Thanks, Chrissie! I'm glad your recent read worked out a lot better for you, and you thoroughly enjoyed it! :)
Thanks, Aly! I think I was just a different reader in high school. It's easy to be impressed when I just didn't have enough life or reading experience. But yea... this reread didn't go the way I thought it would at all. 😕
Thanks, Kat! For sure! But maybe I shouldn't reread books I thought I enjoyed in my childhood.
Thanks, Kay! Yeah, for sure. At least it isn't widely accepted in literature anymore.
Thanks, Julie! Haha, your intuition on that is better than mine! 💖
Thanks, Elena! I totally agree. I think it's also because I was more easily impressed when I was young, so when people told me it's a classic, I automatically felt awe. Now I'm grumpy and hard to please lol. :)
Thanks, Maureen! Ha, me too! :)
Thanks, Barbara! I think so. Or maybe we just have more choices now, so we're less willing to put up with stuff.
Thanks, Lori! Looks like you called it right the first time! ;)
Thanks, Linda! I think this is a case where I should've left well alone, and probably you should too. :)
Thanks, Ellis! Haha, so true! But back then, we thought we were like the smartest smarty-pants ever!
Thanks, Dorie! :)
