[go: up one dir, main page]

Lena's Reviews > Ґалапаґос

Ґалапаґос by Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
120939577
's review

it was ok

Vonnegut is famous for his social satire, but this book takes misanthropy on a new level.
Despite being written more than forty years ago the story still resonates with our reality highlighting how little things changed and how much worse they became. Climate change dread and world war anxiety didn't go anywhere so the topics risen in the book are interesting but the way of presenting them is off-putting. I can't argue with most of author's comments on human society and his self-parody is good, but the book is repulsive. I cringed almost all the time I was listening to it.
In general, interesting but disgustingly described apocalypse that according to the author is the best thing that can happened to humanity.
52 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Ґалапаґос.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 22, 2025 – Shelved as: to-read
April 22, 2025 – Shelved
April 30, 2025 – Started Reading
May 1, 2025 –
page 115
51.34%
May 5, 2025 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Noah (new) - rated it 5 stars

Noah Welikson I personally did not read it this way. Despite the severe flaws of all the characters of Galapagos, there is a certain level of tenderness payed towards the more beautiful parts of the human experience that are totally lost in our small-brained future. Yes our big brains give us the agency to make horrible self-harming decisions, but also to the agency to produce literature and experience romance and so on. I read Galapagos as more ironic than cynical, but I can see why someone would read it differently.


message 2: by Lena (new) - rated it 2 stars

Lena Noah wrote: "I personally did not read it this way. Despite the severe flaws of all the characters of Galapagos, there is a certain level of tenderness payed towards the more beautiful parts of the human experi..."

well, I guess that's the brilliance of Vonnegut writing: it has multiple interpretations and still relatable.


back to top