INTRODUCTION: The term Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) describes all of the clinical consequences emerging from a cerebral vessels lesion, whether there is one or more affected. The patient can experiment a diversity of problems in those...
moreINTRODUCTION: The term Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) describes all of the clinical consequences emerging from a cerebral vessels lesion, whether there is one or more affected. The patient can experiment a diversity of problems in those functions: motricity, sensory, cognitive, communication or urinary. He could feel emotional unease and experience diverse symptoms like fatigue. Data from 2015 indicated that CVA was the second cause of mortality in the world. The trends of the absolute numbers regarding the incidence and the prevalence of CVA are going to potentially increase during the next thirty years in the world, Canada and Quebec.
Thanks to numerous researches a health continuum and rehabilitation program have been created on a medical level. Osteopathy does not belong to the continuum in the three countries from which came the participants: Canada, England and France. Even if the continuum allows for patient's management care, new researches are still broadening the field of knowledge, notably on how the brain works, neuroplasticity, recovery mechanisms and rehabilitation methods. Those researches allowed to challenge the myth of the immutable brain bringing out the knowledge on neuroplasticity and the myth of the six months delay on post CVA recovery.
METHODS: This study subscribes in the constructive paradigm in qualitative research. The design is a focussed ethnography. The chosen sampling method was non probabilistic and the sampling type was done by networking. Population was constituted of two groups: patients and osteopaths. Six patients and seven osteopaths (6 DO and 1 IO) were recruited. Osteopaths-participants came from three different countries as to where they were trained and where they practiced. The patients-participants were all Canadians. Semi-directed interviews permitted to collect data which was analyzed according to the analysis method by writing. Numerous strategies were put in place to reach a certain methodology rigour: verification of the collecting data tools, triangulation, peer debriefing, saturation, additional training of the researcher and logbook.
RESULTS: Results were articulated in four axes: protagonists (patient and osteopath) and their exchanges (uni-directional exchanges like advices and bi- directional like the protagonist’s synergy) ; approaches, clinical principles, specificity and utility of osteopathy ; the therapeutic component (and especially the results) osteopathic intervention and the factors influencing this intervention.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Data originating from the participants was a lot richer than data coming from the collected literature. This present study carries strength like the strategy used to reach a certain methodology rigour, bilingualism, country diversity in training and practice (3 countries) for the osteopath-participants and additional training undertook by the researcher. Weaknesses are in relation with the data collecting tool, the origin of the patients-participants (only Canada) and a
xiv
bias of social desirability which was controlled. Given the state of current knowledge and this study results, it seems appropriate to perform new qualitative and quantitative studies on the osteopathic intervention in a CVA context.
To conclude, the osteopathic intervention in a CVA context is complex. It articulates around the patient and the osteopath. Various elements like personal experience, attitudes, beliefs, patient and osteopath perceptions are all important factors influencing the osteopathic intervention and its results.
Keywords : Cerebrovascular accident, osteopathic intervention, personal experience, patients, osteopaths, brain, neuroplasticity, qualitative study, focussed ethnography.