
I watched the Baftas last night - not sure why; I always do seem to end up tuning into awards ceremonies, even though they are ridiculously long and empirically uninteresting, especially when they are not the Oscars and so you don't get all the fun of each Best Movie nominee being represented through the medium of dance. I suppose that the combination of very beautiful and famous stars plus several minor moments of suspense is just enough to pull you through it, and I confess to an amount of rubbernecking, as Jonathan Ross died so spectacularly on stage last year I couldn't help but wonder if this year would be a repeat performance; but no, he actually did pretty well - and looked amazingly confident, all things considered; I suppose he is being paid enough to die a hundred times over, and therefore doesn't really care. Or maybe he just knew that his jokes were better this time around.
Anyway here are my thoughts on the winners and losers...
Supporting Actress: Tilda Swinton (Cate Blanchett, Kelly Macdonald, Samantha Morton, Saoirse Ronan). This was one of the best ones as if you listed the actresses in order of likelihood to win, Tilda would probably have come bottom. She looked completely flabbergasted, as did the person presenting the award, and as she pointed out, if she'd thought she was going to win, she'd have worn a skirt which would have allowed her to get up the stairs to the stage.
Supporting Actor: Javier Bardem (Paul Dano, Tommy Lee Jones, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Tom Wilkinson). Probably one of the most closely-fought categories, and of them would have been a worthy winner. But I'm glad it was Javier Bardem, as when he is not sporting *that* haircut, he is painfully sexy, as well as charismatic, cutely-accented, witty, modest, charming etc. Yes: I have a new crush.
Actress: Marion Cotillard (Julie Christie, Keira Knightley, Cate Blanchett, Ellen Page): I haven't actually seen La Vie en Rose, but Marion Cotillard's acceptance speech was so charmingly over-the-top and properly, non-faked emotional that I couldn't have wanted anybody else to take it. And my god, isn't she young? They did a great make-up job on her, from what I saw of the la Vie En Rose trailers. At least it wasn't "best wearing of a slinky dress" Knightley or "best performance in a truly execrable movie (Elizabeth: Back in the Saddle)" Blanchett.
Actor: Daniel Day Lewis (George Clooney, James MacAvoy, Viggo Mortenson, Ulrich Muhe). Pretty well-deserved; I saw There Will Be Blood in Toronto and I think it is largely overrated, as a very well-made but self-consciously Important film, with a completely incoherent central character who is only made even halfway convincing through the great skills of Daniel Day Lewis. Basically, I think his performance in this was a con, but a brilliant one, and so worth recognising for that. Personally I'd have liked to have seen Ulrich Muhe win, but I suppose they thought there was little point giving the gong to a dead guy. Though his speech would have been shorter than DDL's.
Animated Film: Ratatouille (Simpsons Movie, Shrek 3). Yawn. Was there really nothing a little more interesting in the cartoon world this year than a pale sequel and a TV remake? No wonder Ratatouille won.
Foreign Language Film: The Lives of Others (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, La Vie en Rose, The Kite Runner, Lust Caution.) Notable for being a better group of films than the Best Film nominees, which does make you wonder why it needs a separate category at all. But the best film definitely won.
Adapted Screenplay: The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (Atonement, The Kite Runner, No Country for Old Men, There Will Be Blood). I've not seen this film, so hard to say much except that having read the (magnificent) memoir, it is hard to see how anyone manage to adapt it for the screen, as is the internal thoughts of someone suffering from total paralysis, so I imagine this is another well-chosen winner.
Original Screenplay: Juno (American Gangster, The Lives of Others, Michael Clayton, This Is England.) Again, I've not yet seen Juno, but how cool was it to see such a young woman (Diablo Cody) getting up to take the prize? I mean, I know it shouldn't matter, but in such a male-dominated industry I got a thrill from it.
Director: Coen Brothers / No Country For Old Men (Joe Wright / Atonement, Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck / Lives of Others, Paul Greengrass / Bourne Ultimatum, Paul Thomas Anderson / There Will Be Blood.) An inspired choice - the movie is so close to the original material, and the Coen Brothers truly squashed down all their trademark tics to make it so - I thought it was a spectacular and supremely modest piece of filmmaking, and I applaud them. (And they're my favourite directors anyway.)
Film: Atonement (American Gangster, The Lives of Others, No Country For Old Men, There Will Be Blood.) Atonement!? Atonement??? What were they thinking? The only thing I can possibly imagine is that every single person with a Bafta vote has either worked with someone who worked on Atonement or hopes to do so in future. Also, it's the only British film on the list, so I suppose that they felt obliged. But of all of them, aside from American Gangster which I haven't seen, it is easily the worst film, which I think is demonstrated by the fact that it lost every other category it was nominated for (aside for one of the technical ones, I forget which.) The Lives of Others got the Foreign Language consolation gong so I suppose that's why it didn't win, though it outshines the rest of them by a mile. Otherwise I would have given it to No Country For Old Men. Such a predictable and disappointing choice, and Joe Wright? You cannot begin an acceptance speech with the words "Last time I was accepting an award on this stage" without looking like a self-important arrogant turnip.