[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label fossils. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fossils. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Monthly Ferns—Prairie Quillwort & Scale Tree

Prairie Quillwort is 50 centimeters tall (© 2015 Robbin Moran); Scale Tree is 50 meters tall (source). Both are lycophytes—formerly "Fern Allies".
This episode of The Monthly Fern was going to feature Isoetes melanopoda, the Prairie Quillwort, mentioned last month in the wildly popular Prairie Spikemoss post (1). But in my search for information I fell down a rabbit hole and landed with a splash in an ancient Wonderland—a wet lush forest 350 million years ago near the start of the Carboniferous Period (2). After extricating myself from the muck I looked around. Tree ferns, horsetails and dragonflies looked familiar, though a bit large. But the trees were very strange.

It was during the Carboniferous that wetland forests with tall trees first appeared in the fossil record. These were hot humid riotous tangles of vegetation growing in shallow water and muddy peat that reeked of decay. Dense stands of curious trees rose high above the understory. The most common (or best preserved) was Lepidodendron, the Scale Tree. "Scale" refers to the distinctive bark—a network of diamond-shaped leaf scars (Halliday 2022).

Wetland forest of the Carboniferous; large Lepidodendron on left (Meyers Konversationslexikon 1885–1890).
Though they've been gone for 300 million years, we know a lot about these trees. Their fossilized remains are among the most extensive for any plant from any geological period, and for good reason. Not only was Lepidodendron large and ecologically dominant, it lived in waterlogged conditions conducive to preservation. Paleontologists have been able to describe features ranging from spores to leaves to trees, and even stands of trees (Hetherington et al. 2016).

Lepidodendron differed in many ways from the trees we know. Stems of young trees were covered in long ascending needle-like leaves. These fell off as the tree grew taller and wider, leaving a spiraling network of diamond-shaped scars on the trunk. With age the trunk developed a thick tough outer layer—bark of sorts—but underneath was soft spongy tissue instead of wood. At maturity the stem branched dichotomously (repeatedly forked), forming a high crown as much as 50 meters above the ground. The final branchlets were tipped with strobili (cones) filled with spores, to be dispersed by wind (source). This so-called "tree" was an arborescent lycophyte, a fern relative.

Juvenile and mature Lepidodendron on left; trees to right are related lycophytes. Reconstruction from fossils, by Falconaumanni.
Given Lepidodendron's massive build, its lack of internal wood and the waterlogged habitat, it seems it would fall before reaching such heights. What kept it upright? Some credit the thick tough bark. But others argue convincingly for the robust root system. From very long rhizomes grew a profusion of highly-branched rootlets covered in root hairs—on the order of 26,000 rootlets per meter of rhizome! They intertwined with those of adjacent trees, forming a strong anchoring network—"trees holding onto one another for stability" (Hetherington et al. 2016; Halliday 2022).

Lepidodendron truly was an arboreal superstar, dominating the wetland forests and producing immense amounts of biomass for tens of millions of years (3). But it was doomed. By 300 million years ago, the Carboniferous rainforests and arborescent lycophytes were gone, destroyed by widespread drought. Lepidodendron's only surviving relatives are little herbaceous plants—Isoetes, the quillworts.

Bolander's Quillworts in a lake in the Wasatch Mountains, Utah. Andrey Zharkikh photo.

Now we return to the present—to a roadside waterhole along highway #44 in Mellette County, South Dakota, where W. H. Over (4) made his 15,878-th plant collection on July 10, 1924. Isoetes has not been collected in the state since.

Over correctly identified his collection to genus—Isoetes. Four months later, TC Palmer called it I. melanopoda, and Daniel F. Brunton agreed in 1995. The specimen resides at the Academy of Natural Sciences, where it has been digitized for all to enjoy (cropped here).
Like all quillworts, the Prairie Quillwort has no stem. Instead a cluster of leaves develops from the rhizome. From a distance these look like clumps of grass, but up close the leaves are distinctive—long, slender, quill-like, and bright green. The leaf bases are broad and pale, forming a swollen rootstock. These usually become black with age, hence the alternative common name—Black-foot Quillwort (plants with leaf bases that remain pale have been called I. melanopoda f. pallida).
Isoetes melanopoda; MWI photo.
Being a lycophyte, Prairie Quillwort produces no seeds. Nor does it have rows of spore-bearing sori on the undersides of its leaves as do most true ferns. Instead, spores are produced in a sac on the inner side of leaf bases.
Isoetes melanopoda; MWI photo.
Surely some readers are wondering ... how is little Isoetes like immense Lepidodendron? Why do botanists think they're related? Answer: It's the roots, especially the way they branch.

"this architecture is conserved among [Lepidodendron's] only extant relatives, herbaceous plants in the Isoetes genus. Therefore, despite the difference in stature and the time that has elapsed, we conclude that both ... have the same rootlet system architecture." (Hetherington et al. 2016)
Lepidodendron and Isoetes rootlets branch dichotomously, narrowing in a stepwise manner. A is a diagram of a rootlet with 4 levels of branching. B and C show rootlets of Isoetes and Lepidodendron (scale bars are 5 mm). Hetherington et al. 2015, Fig. 1 in part.
A final question: Is Prairie Quillwort gone from South Dakota? Has it suffered its own extinction? Maybe so. Skilled botanists have searched for it with no luck. But perhaps they were limiting themselves, looking only in "roadside waterholes" and such. Of great interest to me is its occurrence nearby in Minnesota where it's a state Endangered species. It's distribution there is quite limited—rainwater and seepage pools in quartzite rock outcrops, in the southwest corner of the state.
MWI photo.
This rock—Sioux quartzite—also crops out in the southeast corner of South Dakota. I visited several locations a few years ago, and am tempted to go back now that I have a such a vivid search image for Prairie Quillwort in my head!
Sign at Palisades State Park, SD. Pink marks exposures of Sioux Quartzite in southwest MN and southeast SD.
See any habitat?

Notes

(1) Last week I noticed that views of my Prairie Spikemoss post had skyrocketed. Now Desert Mountain is getting the same level of attention. I'm suspicious. Are chatbots visiting, searching for information? Are AI models being built? Have you had this experience?

(2) In North America the Carboniferous often is treated as two periods— Mississippian followed by Pennsylvanian.

(3) Though long extinct, Lepidodendron remains vitally important. Fossilized remains of those wetland forests with giant trees and abundant peat (aka Coal Forests) drove rapid industrialization in the 18th and 19th centuries, and continue to sustain our dependency on fossil fuels (oil and gas are more common in Cretaceous rocks).

(4) W. H. Over must have been a bright and highly motivated autodidact. He quit school in Illinois after finishing the 8th grade, homesteaded in South Dakota, and by the time of his Isoetes collection, was Museum Curator at the University of South Dakota. He would go on to become one of the state's great botanists. Among his many achievements is the "Flora of South Dakota"—the first comprehensive treatment of plants known for the state. For more about Dr. Over (he was awarded a Doctor of Science degree at age 70), start here and here. I'm still looking for a comprehensive biography.

Sources (in addition to links in post)

Halliday, T. 2022. Otherlands; a Journey through Earth's Extinct Worlds. Random House.
The Carboniferous Period is in Chapter 11, "Fuel". Halliday's descriptions of past worlds are surprisingly detailed, and supported with many citations.

Hetherington, AJ, Berry, CM, Dola, L. 2016. Networks of highly branched stigmarian rootlets developed on the first giant trees. PNAS 113:6695–6700.  https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1514427113

Moran, Robbin. 2004. A Natural History of Ferns. Timber Press.

Monday, November 19, 2018

Charismatic Kansan Megafauna

Eerie eye of a hungry mosasaur!
This is the third in a series of posts about my visit to the Kansas chalk (1)—the remains of the great Western Interior Seaway which covered a large swath of North America roughly 100 to 60 million years ago. I was most taken by the chalk itself—its planktonic composition, the conditions in which it formed (imagine Kansas underwater!), and the bizarre picturesque outcrops in the valley of the Smoky Hill River. However it’s not the chalk that most people get excited about, but rather what it contains—lots of well-preserved fossils of gigantic beasts now long gone.

This is not to say I had no interest in the chalk’s fossils. In fact, I was eager to see the creatures of the Seaway, and I devoted an entire day to the Sternberg Museum of Natural History in Hays. It was well worth the hundred-mile drive (each way).

But first a quick review. About 87 to 82 million years ago, Kansas lay in the middle of the Western Interior Seaway, far enough from shore that little terrestrial debris washed in. Instead, seafloor sediments were dominated by dead plankton, mainly the calcareous scales of coccolithophores, which rained down in abundance.
Red X marks Kansas (USGS).
Coccolithophores thrived in the Kansas sea. Their microscopic scales formed chalk beds 600 feet thick! (source).
Occasionally carcasses of bigger creatures fell to the seafloor and were entombed in the limy muck. With pressure from overlying sediments, the muck became chalk. Uplift, retreat of the sea, and finally erosion exposed the chalk and the remains of those long-dead animals—today’s fossils.
Collecting a Xiphactinus fossil (large fish) from the Kansas chalk, early 20th century (Fick Museum, Oakley).
Originally, a fossil was simply something “obtained by digging” (from L. fossilis). But in the 18th century, usage became restricted to preserved remains of living organisms (including impressions, and traces such as burrows and tracks). Fossils are common in the Smoky Hill Chalk, and often spectacular. Not surprisingly, when word got out that there was a treasure trove of novel fossils awaiting discovery in western Kansas, the big names in North American paleontology got really excited.

In 1870, Professor Othniel Marsh of Yale and his students rode the Union Pacific Railroad as far as North Platte, Nebraska. Joined by a military escort, they explored the fossil-rich country of western Nebraska before continuing across Wyoming to Salt Lake City and finally San Francisco. On the return trip, they made just a quick stop in Kansas, in the valley of the Smoky Hill River. But it was long enough for Marsh to make the discovery that sparked his passion for the Kansas chalk—a strange hollow bone, probably the finger of something that flew! Though it was the end of the day and fast getting dark, he carefully excavated the bone and precisely noted the location.

The next year, Marsh returned to the site and collected the wing bones of a giant pterosaur—far larger than any previously described, and the first found outside of Europe. After several years of taxonomic wrangling, it became Pteranodon (2), now one of the two state fossils of Kansas (3).
Marsh with his students, ready for adventure! (source)
A few years later, local farm boy and fossil enthusiast Charles H. Sternberg enrolled at Kansas State Agriculture College, where he heard some exciting news. Professor B.F. Mudge (also the state geologist) would lead a party of students to search the chalk for fossils for Professor Marsh! Though the expedition was full, Sternberg “made every effort within my power” to join. But he was turned down.

In despair, and desperate to collect fossils in the chalk, Sternberg wrote to another leading paleontologist, Professor Edward Drinker Cope of Philadelphia—who happened to be Marsh’s arch rival.
“I put my soul into the letter I wrote him, for this was my last chance. I told him of my love for science, and of my earnest longing to enter the chalk of western Kansas and make a collection of its wonderful fossils, no matter what it might cost me in discomfort and danger.”
Sternberg explained that he was too poor to finance a trip himself, and asked for $300 for a wagon, horses, camping gear, a cook and driver. He sent no recommendations “from well-known men” but did mention his earlier work collecting fossil leaves in central Kansas. Cope quickly replied, sending a draft for three hundred dollars and a note: “I like the style of your letter. Enclose draft. Go to work.”

What are the chances today that a preeminent scientist would send funding to some unknown local?! Those were different times, it’s true, but there’s another likely factor—Cope’s bitter rivalry with Marsh (4). Cope surely was eager to get his hands on fossils from the Kansas chalk. As it would turn out, that $300 was a wise investment.

Charles H. Sternberg spent four hard but happy and productive years collecting fossils for Cope, the beginning of a fossil-collecting dynasty that included Charles and his three sons—George F., Charles M. and Levi. The Sternberg family often named children after relatives, so the full story can be hard to follow. But for this post, we only need to know Charles H. and his oldest son, George F. The latter was named after his uncle, George M., an army surgeon stationed in Kansas (and later US Surgeon General) who convinced his father to move the family there to farm.
By age 17, Charles H. Sternberg (1850-1943) knew he would devote his life to fossil-collecting. His father thought it a poor choice (source).
George F. Sternberg (1883-1969) collected his first important fossil, a novel plesiosaur, at age nine. His contributions to Kansas paleontology were monumental (Fick Museum, Oakley).
After graduating from high school, George F. worked in the family fossil business full time, earning widespread respect for his collecting and research. Lack of a college education was never a problem until the Western Branch of the Kansas Normal School (today’s Fort Hays State University) discovered that without a college degree, Sternberg could not be hired as a professor. So he became museum curator, a position he held until 1962. After his death in 1969, the museum was renamed in his family’s honor.

George F. Sternberg (source).
At the Sternberg Museum, I paid a modest fee and entered the first floor of exhibits. I immediately spotted George F. Sternberg, who was carefully excavating a huge fish fossil! It was one of his most famous discoveries—the Fish-Within-A-Fish—a Xiphactinus that died not long after swallowing a Gillicus. It’s on display next to George.
At 14 feet in length, this is a rather average Xiphactinus.
George F.’s Fish-Within-A-Fish advertises the Lithic Bookstore and Gallery in Fruita, Colorado. 
Just across from Xiphactinus is a huge Dragon of the Sky—Pteranodon, the Kansas flight fossil (3) and logo of the Sternberg Museum. It was the fossilized finger bone of a Pteranodon that got Professor Othniel Marsh excited about the Kansas chalk. Marsh’s first description had some serious errors due to lack of body parts and careless packing—a Xiphactinus tooth got mixed in (source). Based on wing bones and the errant tooth, Marsh concluded this animal was similar to European toothed pterosaurs. But when skeletons were found with skulls, he had to revise his thinking. This pterosaur had a giant crest on its head and no teeth—a brand new kind! Marsh changed its name to Pteranodon (2).
Note the massive crest atop Pteranodon’s head and framed on the left (museum logo added).
The exhibits were so beautiful, as well as educational, that I spent a lot of time taking photos and notes.
Shark vertebrae.
GillicusXiphactinus’s last supper—also was a predatory fish.
Seymouria is much older than the chalk, but was too photogenic to ignore. An amphibian with reptilian features, it lived roughly 275 million years ago. This one is about two feet long.
Exhibits about local geological history and stratigraphy were a terrific help in understanding the context of Kansas chalk. I'm glad I visited the Museum early in my trip. Below are two formations from the stratigraphy exhibit—the beloved Niobrara Formation (because it includes the chalk) and the younger Pierre Shale, which is made of fine terrestrial sediments indicating the Seaway was in retreat.
The Sternberg is a natural history museum that includes much more than fossils from the Smoky Hill Chalk. But they were my focus, and they kept me busy for several hours. Not surprisingly, these are mainly marine animals—shellfish, sharks, fish (some huge!), giant turtles and other hulking creatures like the mosasaur, a giant reptilian marine predator (5).
Though big, reptilian and now extinct, mosasaurs (above and below) are not a dinosaurs. Why? … see Were Pterosaurs and Mosasaurs Dinosaurs? for a simplified explanation.
The most popular members of the Mesozoic megafauna are rarely found in the chalk—the dinosaurs. They were terrestrial, so were absent from the Seaway. A notable exception is Niobrarasaurus—notable enough that it has its own exhibit. It’s a puzzle: How did a terrestrial creature end up on the seafloor far from land? Perhaps it died on shore, and its bloated carcass washed out to sea where it floated for some time before finally sinking. This is the “Bloat & Float” hypothesis.
A reptilian tank with armored plates.
Niobrarasaurus was named for the Niobrara Formation, of which the Smoky Hill Chalk is a member. The creature was “built like a tank” and covered in armored plates, which may have helped maintain the bloat. This fossil was excavated from the chalk in 1930, and shipped off to the University of Missouri in Columbus. Seventy-two years later, Niobrarasaurus was repatriated, and is now on display at the Sternberg Museum.

Not Cretaceous, but I couldn’t pass it by!
After several hours on the first and second floors, including an irresistible detour to see all 22 of our rattler species live! (behind glass), I checked the gallery guide and saw there was a third floor, featuring an Upland Diorama. Memories surfaced of the simple small-scale less-than-realistic dioramas in the natural history museums we visited as kids. I have fond memories of those visits, so I started up the stairs. But before I got even halfway, it became obvious …
Oh my! Hadrosaur ahead!!
… my expectations were wrong! This is a life-size realistic total-immersion diorama. Pterosaurs flew overhead, specifically Pteranodon sternbergii, named for George F., who collected the first specimen in 1966. Life-size sculpted creatures mingled with more of their kind in the panoramas on the walls behind.
These scenes would have been in Colorado, on the west shore of the Western Interior Seaway. And there on the beach I spotted the dead bloated Niobrarasaurus, not yet washed out to sea.
From the beach, I descended through the Schmidt Exhibit, walking away from shore along the floor of the Seaway. First there were sandy beach deposits, then finer sediments—silt and clay—in deeper water. Far from shore, I reached the wonderful limy muck—planktonic debris overlying limestone and chalk (sediment labels added).
Finally, the walkway rounded a corner and I floated off through the waters of the Western Interior Seaway  face-to-face with its charismatic megafauna!
Yikes! Xiphactinus!!

Notes

(1) Other posts in this series are To Kansas to See the Chalk and A Ghost Rock Speaks.

(2) Some paleontologists now place Pteranodon sternbergii in the genus Geosternbergia (source).

(3) Pteranodon is the Kansas flight fossil. Tylosaurus, a mosasaur, is the Kansas marine fossil. Both are from the Smoky Hill Chalk. Nothing wrong with having two state fossils, especially given Kansas’s impressive fossil heritage! More here.

(4) The Marsh-Cope rivalry was bitter and brutal. Both “used underhanded methods to try to outdo the other in the field, resorting to bribery, theft, and the destruction of bones. Each scientist also sought to ruin his rival's reputation and cut off his funding, using attacks in scientific publications.” (from Bone Wars).

(5) The photo at top of post is the mosasaur Tylosaurus, the Kansas marine fossil (full skull below). It’s on display at the Fick Museum in Oakley, which is much smaller than the Sternberg, but fascinating and worth a visit.

Sources

Liggett, GA. 2001. Dinosaurs to dung beetles: expeditions through time. Hays, KS: Sternberg Museum of Natural History.

Sternberg, CH. 1909, reprinted 1990. The life of a fossil hunter. Indiana University Press. Recommended reading!

Sternberg Museum of Natural History. Gallery Guide. Available here.

Friday, February 24, 2017

A Fossil Fish Festival!

Paleontologists at work.

Thirty-one years ago, a small group of Wyoming citizens launched a campaign to honor a fish, specifically a small uncharismatic herring-like fish that hadn’t been seen for 50 million years. They didn’t get very far. The legislature had no interest in small fish nor the distant past. But these advocates were driven by a passion far exceeding that of most lobbyists—perhaps a passion of innocence, for none were older than twelve.

The next year, they tried again … and this time they succeeded! Knightia was designated State Fossil of Wyoming.
Knightia alta, a bit over 2 inches long; NPS photo.
Knightia slab, University of Wyoming Geology Museum.
When these exquisitely-preserved fish fossils began to surface by the thousands, they impressed even the most experienced of experts. Paleontologist Joseph Leidy of the University of Pennsylvania examined fossils sent by geologist Ferdinand Vandeveer Hayden, head of the US Geological Survey of the Territories. In the final report, he wrote:
“About two miles west of Rock Springs Station there is an excavation on the railroad which has been called the Petrified Fish Cut, on account of the thousands of beautiful and perfect fossil-fishes which are found on the surface of the thin shales, sometimes a dozen or more on an area of a square foot.” [Leidy 1873; italics added]
Leidy identified the fish as Clupea, the genus that includes today’s herring, and described two new fossil species.
Leidy’s Clupea humilis and C. alta; Figures 1 and 2, Plate XVII, Leidy 1873.

A decade later, one of the biggest names in American paleontology, Edward Drinker Cope, moved the fossils to the genus Dyplomystus. Then in 1907, David Star Jordan split Dyplomystus into two genera, and placed the Wyoming herring fossils in Knightia, where they remain to this day. Jordan named them Knightia to honor Wilbur C. Knight, the first State Geologist of Wyoming, and an “indefatigable student of the palaeontology of the Rocky Mountains.” Knight had recently died, in 1903—only 45 years old.
Clupea eocaena Jordan; NPS photo.
State Geologist and university professor Wilbur C. Knight (photo in UW Geology Museum).

Southwest Wyoming in the Eocene (Chicago Field Museum).
Why so many fish fossils? Because fifty million years ago, great schools of knightias swam in the giant lakes of southwest Wyoming. During periodic die-offs, dead fish accumulated on the lake bottoms where they were entombed in dirt, debris and volcanic ash. Now they're immortalized in lakebed muck turned to shale—the Green River Formation.
“In the valley of the latter [Green River] remarkable sections of strata are exposed to view. The group he [Hayden] calls the Green River shales, because the strata are composed of thin layers, varying in thickness from that of a knife-blade to several inches. The rocks all have a grayish-buff color on exposure, sometimes with bands of dark brown. These darker bands are saturated with a bituminous matter which renders them combustible.” (Leidy 1873)
Edge-wise view of Green River shale. Dark hydrocarbon-rich bands give the rock a noticeably oily smell. The little oval structure is fossilized fish poop.
Millions of Knightia fossils have been collected—and continue to be. It’s the most commonly excavated fossil fish in the world! You would think all Wyoming citizens would be proud of a fish with that kind of significance, especially one named for a Founding Father of Wyoming geology. But in 1986 when Mr. Miller's class approached the legislature about designation, they got nowhere.

The next year, things looked more promising. A bill was introduced. But an amendment was proposed almost immediately ... to designate the rattlesnake instead. Yikes! Miller and his students were stunned, their hopes sank. Fortunately the amendment was killed. Then another surprise—the bill passed unanimously, with full bipartisan support. Turns out the amendment was a fake, intended as a lesson in the legislative process.
Governor Sullivan signs the Fossil Fish bill under the watchful eyes of Anderson elementary school students.

Last Saturday, we celebrated the thirtieth anniversary of Knightia’s designation—at the Fossil Fish Festival. Experts gave tours of the Geology Museum and collections. Novice paleontologists prepared fossils, carefully scraping away shale bit by bit to reveal tiny bones. Others made fossil rubbings. Faces and arms were painted. We watched Your Inner Fish (very good movie), and even feasted on Knightia! … cookies that is ;-)
Aspiring paleontologists learn the tricks of the trade.
Fossils from the Green River Formation, available for rubbings.
The festival was held in the Berry Center, University of Wyoming, Laramie.

Sources

Grande, L. 1982. A revision of the fossil genus Knightia… Novitates 2731 (American Museum of Natural History). PDF

Jordan, DS. 1907. Fossil fishes of California; with supplementary notes on other species of extinct fishes. Bulletin of the Department of Geology, vol. 5. Berkeley :The University Press. [Biodiversity Heritage Library http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/139556]

Leidy, J. 1873. Contributions to the extinct vertebrate fauna of the western territories. Washington: Government Printing Office. [Biodiversity Heritage Library http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/125566]