[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label Woodcut. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Woodcut. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Cutting labels

           
[a] 1890, Comic Cuts (detail).

Yesterday’s Papers. Today’s Views.
by Huib van Opstal

[10] print labeling
Seduced by better printing, most artists, painters and others, sooner or later started using print too. The label ‘picture’ for ‘properly the art of painting’ was there first — in particular for paintings done in oils and in colour, profiled as single works and marketed as ‘high art.’ But today the word picture is a common word and simply refers to anything pictorial.

‘Sculpture’ is a label with a similar history. It began as a description for making classical sculpture and then for similar other ways of working. Metal engravers in the 1600s, able to resculpt their grooves like sculptors do, also began to sign their work-for-print in copper or steel ‘sculpture’ or ‘sc’ for ‘sculpsit,’ carved it. For a long period of time labels like ‘plate’ and ‘engraving’ solely meant work that’s done in metal. A new label begins to spread around the year 1800: ‘litho’ or ‘lithography’ for work that’s done via stone. Confusing in the mid-1700s remains that a ‘cut’ can refer to both metal and wood.

Since the 1800s the bulk of printed illustration is produced via wood and stone; afterwards, the three general terms used for a picture remain ‘cut’ or ‘block’ or ‘litho.’ In the 20th century they all refer either to the pictures themselves or to master films for printing.

[b] 1884-85, Choice Chips.
‘Cut.’ Up to the year 1900 printing via wood — via woodcut blocks, woodcuts, wood engravings — remains the cheapest and most used method.

‘Cut-workes.’ In London in 1632, a selection of stock woodblocks with illustrated ornaments is presented in book form, in the scrapbook way. On the title page described as ‘Certaine Patternes of Cut-workes: and but once Printed before.’

‘WITH THIRTEEN CUTS’ is how in 1819 London publisher William Hone subtitles his satirical pamphlet The Political House that Jack Built, illustrated in woodcut by George Cruikshank. ‘With a Cut’ is how he in 1821 advertises his ‘Works nearly out of Print,’ pamphlets which are each embellished with a single, rather crude woodcut.

‘By means of Wood-cuts’ is how in 1832-33 publisher-editor Charles Knight (b.1791) of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge explains the success of his small-page weekly — his ‘little work’ — The Penny Magazine (s.1832) in England, together with his steep claim to have reached a weekly sale of 200.000 copies in its first year.

[c] 1898, Illustrated Chips.
Cut versus Engraving. But the ‘woodcut’ label gradually fades away. Under the mock alibi engraving tools are used on end-grain instead of side-grain wood, ‘woodcut’ is replaced by the more posh sounding ‘wood engraving.’ As distorting a label as the shortened cut and engraving. A cut, or an engraving, via metal or wood? Carved, cut, chiseled, incised or excised, or etched with acids? (Much to the regret of those who consider woodcuts cheap and vulgar, the artsy name ‘xylography’ for woodcut doesn’t catch on in English.)

‘With Comic Cuts’ is the wording used in December 1831 when The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction reviews the latest comic annuals in a second supplementary number, titled ‘The Spirit of the Annuals for 1832’ — duplicating three woodcuts from The Comic Annual and The Comic Offering; or Ladies’ Melange of Literary Mirth. The reuse of these illustrations is talked about with great excitement.

‘Amusing cuts.’ In 1832 the small-page The Comic Magazine (subtitle: ‘Intended For The Risible Muscles’) offers an ‘amazing number of amusing cuts of the punning order’ and lots of wordplay, often in the form of just a short pun with a crude woodcut illustrating it. (Cuts presented on the cover as ‘Engravings by Dank, Esq.’) Editors in different years were Gilbert Abbott à Beckett (b.1811) and artist Alfred Crowquill (b.1804, penname of Alfred Henry Forrester). The typesetting is so large, the white between the lines so high, that most pages of The Comic Magazine carry only the shortest amount of text.

[d] 1890s, Comic Cuts.
‘COMIC CUTS.’ In 1833 The Comic Magazine advertises: ‘SPLENDID NOVELTY !!! This Week, Price only Threepence, A BROADSIDE OF COMIC CUTS, printed on fine paper, the size of “The Times,” presenting nearly ONE HUNDRED FIRST RATE ENGRAVINGS, By Seymour and — Dank, Esq. Selected from the early Numbers of THE COMIC MAGAZINE.’

‘Highly Humorous Cuts.’ The 1834 New Comic Annual is ‘Illustrated with One Hundred Highly Humorous Cuts.’

‘Illustrated with Designs on Steel and Wood by George Cruikshank’ is how editor-writer W. Harrison Ainsworth, Esq. (b.1805) launches Ainsworth’s Magazine in 1842 (subtitle: ‘A Monthly Miscellany of Romance, General Literature, and Art’) — for sale ‘On the 29th of January (…) price Eighteenpence (…) Orders received by all Booksellers and Newsmen.’

[e] 1890, Funny Cuts.
‘Saucy and Spicy Cuts.’ In the summer of 1855, New York publisher Garrett & Co. publishes a new strip book — by an author kept anonymous — titled The Wonderful and Amusing Doings by Sea & Land of Oscar Shanghai advertised in August as ‘… All told in a series of nearly TWO HUNDRED of the most RISIBLE, QUIZZIBLE, PROVOKING, PECULIAR, SAUCY AND SPICY CUTS ever gathered within the leaves of any one book …’ Earlier ideas by Swiss stripmaker Rodolphe Töpffer are quietly recycled in it.

‘Comic Cuts.’ In Victorian times the woodcut roots of papers with comical illustrations often show up in their titles and bookish spinoffs — Cuts… Amusing Cuts … Funny Cuts … Comic Cuts… Cheap comic weeklies carry grand cover banners and subtitles like ‘150 comic and humorous cuts for one penny’ … ‘A Journal of Humour, Romance, Comic Cuts, And Answers On Everything.’ Funny Cuts (1890) is subtitled: ‘JOKES, PICTURES, STORIES & TALES.’

[f] 26 July 1890, Illustrated Chips, nr 1, Vol. 1.
‘Chips.’ In America, a joke book is titled Chips from Uncle Sam’s Jack-knife. From New York comes a comic monthly titled Chip Basket in 1869. England has its weekly ILLUSTRATED CHIPS in 1890 (with the cover price lettered as large as its title, twice). The penny-paper Choice Chips has its title pictured in bent wood chips; the squibs in it are done under titles like ‘Quaint Chips’ or ‘Illustrated Chips.’ (A shortish satire in words may be called a ‘squib’ or a ‘skit’ or a ‘quip’ or a ‘chip.’) In 1897, the work of American illustrator Frank P.W. Bellew, Jr. (1862-94) — whose penname was ‘Chip’ — is titled “Chip’s” Old Wood Cuts. 

[g] 1890, Illustrated Short Cuts.
Stock blocks. In London many comic papers are assembled the scrapbook way, for the larger part assembled from years-old stock blocks, and sold for as little as posible. (In the 1880s swiping by photographic means picks up speed too.) Papers with titles like: Illustrated Short Cuts (1890)… Snap-Shots (1890, subtitle: ‘Humorous Pictures, chiefly from Advance Proofs of this Week’s American Comic Papers. With Useful, Entertaining, and Amusing Reading’)… Comic Pictorial Sheet (1891)… Comic Pictorial Nuggets (1892)… The Comic Home Journal (1895, subtitle: ‘The Friday Edition of Illustrated Chips’)… Comic Bits (1898)… The World’s Comic (1892, subtitle: ‘Edited by Grandad Twiggle’)…

[h] 1890, Comic Cuts.
Real and fictional editors — some with large scissors in hand — have names like ‘Mr. Chips,’ ‘Chips Esq.,’ ‘Mr. Comic Cuts,’ ‘Mr. C.C.’ or ‘Mr. Clarence C. Cutts,’ and begin to figure as funny men in strips themselves, even in their papers’ front-page top titles (‘mastheads’ or ‘nameplates’).

Price cut. In 1890 a young London editor-publisher, Alfred C. Harmsworth (b.1865), in business with his younger brother Harold, targets readers of all ages. English comics in the late 1800s cost no more than a penny, still an amount only to be spent by adults. They publish papers under their trade names ‘“Answers” Company’ and ‘Pandora Publishing.’ On 17 May 1890 — with the launch of their weekly Comic Cuts, carefully captioned ‘Amusing Without Being Vulgar’ and subtitled twice: ‘Pictures, Prizes, Jokes,’ and ‘A Penny Illustrated Paper for One Halfpenny’ next — the cover price is lowered to half a dime. Four of its eight pages are filled with picture cuts, the other four with short texts. Cuts from other publishers are quietly recycled in it. Jokingly plugged as ‘The Poor Man’s Punch,’ it is noticed by readers of all ages in the 90s — ‘Comic Cuts… One Hundred Laughs for One Halfpenny!…’ — and commercially so successful, that all competitors followed, making the ha’p’orth (half-penny worth) paper the new standard.

A little later, the top title on the cover gets a new standard caption: ‘CLEVER ARTISTS SHOULD SUBMIT WORK TO THE EDITOR OF “COMIC CUTS,” Enclosing large stamped envelope for return, in case of rejection.’

In May 1892, in prominent advertisements Harmsworth claims — for its first four weekly titles together — a circulation of over a million sold copies per week.
“A WORLD’S RECORD. (…) Figures certified by Chartered Accountants (…) The largest circulation not only in the United Kingdom but in the whole world. In less than four years (…) The HARMSWORTH Journals, “ANSWERS,” “COMIC CUTS,” “ILLUSTRATED CHIPS,” and “FORGET-ME-NOT,” 1,009,067 Copies Weekly. (…) Circulations are not gauged by the sale of a holiday issue.

Why have the “ANSWERS” journals achieved so vast
a sale? Because they were the first cheap papers to recognize the fact that the day is passed when the public will be satisfied with clippings from American newspapers and old books, and because their literary and artistic expenditure is, per journal, five times as great as that of any of their imitators.”
Answers (s.1888, initial titel: Answers to Correspondents) is profiled as ‘a high-class penny weekly magazine.’

Forget-Me-Not (s.1891) is profiled as ‘a ladies’ paper’ and ‘a ladies’ journal’ and described as ‘charmingly written and illustrated, and printed in the style of the six-penny magazines.’

Comic Cuts is profiled as ‘an illustrated comics paper’ with a ‘circulation (…) equal to all the cheap illustrated weeklies combined. It is practically a penny paper sold for 1/2 d. among its artists are the best men of the “Graphic,” “Illustrated London News,” an “Black and White.”’

Illustrated Chips (s. 26 July 1890) is profiled as ‘an illustrated paper’ and ‘another penny paper sold for 1/2 d. Its circulation is one of the most remarkable features of modern periodical journalism.’

[i] 1897, Illustrated Chips.
Most famous reader. In an 1890s Comic Cuts series of poster parodies that picture VIPs reading it, the one titled ‘Famous Comic Poster No. 6’ shows an amused British Queen — ‘What would the nation do without its Queen? Worse: What would the Queen do without her Comic Cuts?’

Huib van Opstal

[ to be continued ]

Click up next or preceding paragraphs here:

[1-8] Roughly, eye shock 1800

 [9] The text, the type, the visual

[10] Cutting labels
  
[11] The Hogarth-Doyle Punch foundation


Tuesday, October 22, 2013

The Lost Chord; or, Faint Heart Never Won Fair Lady! – [Tom Noddy 3]



THERE ARE, as perhaps the reader knows, two different ways of drawing for wood. One is, to paint a finished picture in black and white, using the brush and washes of different degrees of intensity; picking out the lights with white, or leaving the white paper for them. The [wood] engraver translates this in his own way, cutting his own lines to represent or, rather, interpret the value of the tone left by the artist. In this case the artist is very much at the mercy of his engraver.
[…]
THE OTHER way is to draw one’s picture with pencil, or, better still, with pen and ink [on wood], using a simple conventional black outline to give the shape and enclose the form and face; then adding more lines and pen-and-ink scratches, simple or cross-hatched, to suggest colour and tone, as an etcher does with his needle, and leaving blank all that the artist judges non-essential to his picture — leaving it in fact, to the imagination. The engraver cuts all this in facsimile; it is more than his place is worth to add a line of his own, or leave out one of the artist’s.
[…]
I confess that, to me, the second is the more attractive of the two.


THE LOST CHORD
by George du Maurier 


in The Christmas Number of Punch
and Punch’s Almanack for 1894.

[1 to 4]

[5 to 8]

[9 to 12]

[13 to 16]
QUOTE by George du Maurier, from his essay The Illustration of Books from the Serious Artist’s Point of View, in the Magazine of Art 13, 1890.

Thanks to Mr Punch.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

American Woodcut Advertisements


New England Palladium, July 31, 1807

NY Weekly Witness, 1881

Providence RI Phenix, June 13, 1807

Providence RI Phenix, June 13, 1807

Providence RI Phenix, June 13, 1807

York PA Republican, January 24, 1844

York PA Republican, January 24, 1844

Images courtesy E.M. Sanchez-Saavedra

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

My name is George du Maurier – where do I cut my initials?


 
A du Maurier cut in Punch, August 26, 1865

 by Huib van Opstal

You have a French father and an English mother. You’ve gone through several depressions already. Not least the one following the loss of sight in your left eye in 1858, at twenty-four. Yet, you persist in realizing your dream of drawing and writing for a London weekly called Punch.

Within years you are one of their finest. Late in 1864, with the passing of well-known Punch artist John Leech, you are invited to join the Punch staff, to take Leech’s empty chair at the weekly dinner, and to cut your initials ‘DM’ right beside his signature on the Punch table at number 10, Bouverie Street.

The tall, pretty women you draw in endless repetition attract most attention. You become Punch’s exclusive society reporter in cartoons and illustrations. You write satires and do strips. Most of it in a near realistic style, long before ‘photo journalism’ takes off.

For decades you excel in the tough technique of drawing directly on boxwood, depending on woodcutters who by necessity have to destroy your artwork to realise the finished printed product.

The type of drawing shown above is what you – seemingly carefree – offer the public in the summer of ’65. In a state of bliss, you confidently ‘sign’ it with carved initials too.

Much later E.-V. Lucas muses about George du Maurier:
“…if ever a man worshipped beauty it was he. Not only did he worship it, but he created it. The remark that, by his celebration in Punch of tall and graceful types, du Maurier added 2 inches to the height of English woman has often been made; and, such is the imitative adaptability of women, it is probably true…”

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Daydreams and Night Things: Punch’s George du Maurier


By John Adcock

George du Maurier’s dream strip “Tom Noddy’s Christmas Nightmare” was drawn in late 1891 and echoed in its title an earlier strip by John Leech from Punch Vol. 28, March 10, 1855, “Mr. Tom Noddy’s First Day With the Hounds After the Long Frost.” Leech’s “Mr. Tom Noddy” appeared in four full-panel strip pages and two single-panel cartoons over the following weeks. Leech was not the originator of sequential comic art in Punch, and “Mr. Tom Noddy” was not the first recurring character. Volume 14 of Punch for 1853 carried eight pages of “Mr. Peter Piper” by an unknown artist, and in Punch, Vol. 28, 1855, there were two series, one featuring the character “Mr. Spoonbill,” and a two-part “Mr. Popplewit.”


Both Leech and du Maurier’s works were reproduced by wood engraving but the technology had changed by the nineties. John Leech was of the old school, he had been drawing comicalities on the wood soon after C.J. Grant illustrated the “Pickwick Songster.” John Leech (signing J.L.), in company with the brothers Cruikshank, Robert Seymour, and Kenny Meadows, contributed comic cuts to Bell’s Life in London and Sporting Chronicle.


In February 1836, young Charles Dickens, a reporter on the Morning Chronicle, agreed to write a serial text to accompany comic prints by the caricaturist Robert Seymour. The first installment on March 31, 1836, was entitled “The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club containing a faithful record of the Perambulations, Perils, Travels, Adventures and Sporting Transactions of the Corresponding members.” These numbers were edited by “Boz” (as Dickens signed) for Chapman & Hall, and contained four comic illustrations by Robert Seymour.


“Pickwick” was modeled on the illustrated penny part serials produced by the “unstamped” and was to prove an inestimable influence on the future of comic art and the rise of the illustrated book, newspaper, and magazine. G.W.M. Reynolds’s shilling piracy “Pickwick Abroad; or, the Tour in France” was illustrated with steel engravings by caricaturist Alfred Crowquill.


Punch; or; the London Charivari was modeled on the French comic periodical Charivari, and first published on July 17, 1841. The originator of Punch was a wood-engraver named Ebenezer Landells, who passed his proprietorship on to Bradbury & Evans. The wood-engraving factory was taken over by Joseph Swain, Sr. The editor from 1841 to 1870 was Mark Lemon [with Henry Mayhew].  Shirley Brooks edited from 1870 to 1874, Tom Taylor from 1874 to 1880, and F.C. Burnand from 1880 to 1906. Each bound volume of Punch from 1842 to 1899 included a Punch’s Almanack.


When John Leech produced “Tom Noddy” he would have drawn each panel separately, in ink, onto a single block of wood. For the final printing the boxwood images would be fitted together with brass bolts to make one full page caption strip. By the time du Maurier drew “Tom Noddy’s Christmas Nightmare” in 1891 the ink drawings were photographed directly onto the boxwood. There was a good reason for the lack of speech “bubbles” in Victorian comics, and it had to do with the time-wasting cost of having woodpeckers chisel out every letter onto the wood block. Type-setting was cheaper and faster.

George Louis Palmella Busson du Maurier was born in Paris on March 6, 1834 to a French father and an English mother, and educated at London, Antwerp and Dusseldorf. He studied life-drawing at Gleyre’s atelier in Paris where he befriended the Impressionist painter Whistler.


At Antwerp in 1857 du Maurier suddenly lost sight in one eye. For the rest of his life he lived in fear of total blindness. “It has poisoned all my existence,” he told an interviewer. Inspired by Leech’s cartoons in the Punch’s Almanack he moved to London in hopes of gaining a berth on Punch. His friendship with Charles Keene [elected to the Punch staff in 1860], who drew full comic pages before du Maurier took his knife to the Punch Table, was probably a factor in his own adoption of the comic strip format.


The young du Maurier was a snob, who looked forward to the day “when illustrating for the millions (swinish multitude) à la Phiz and à la Gilbert will give place to real art, more expensive to print and engrave and therefore only within the means of more educated classes, who will appreciate more.” [The Young George Du Maurier, p.36, April 1861]

Du Maurier was referring to illustration, and it seems was unaware that in 1851 and 1852 two installments of “The Adventures of Mr. Verdant Green, an Oxford Freshman,” a strip by Cuthbert Bede, were published in The Illustrated London News. This high quality experiment led to full-page color and b&w comic strip pages in The Graphic, The Illustrated Times, and The Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News. Most of the artistic contributors had trained in Fine Art and worked as illustrators on magazines, books, and illustrated comic papers.


His background was in the Fine Arts and he was primarily an illustrator. The older generation of book and magazine illustrators, Cruikshank, “Phiz,” and Leech, were caricaturists first and foremost. Du Maurier had a tough time getting started in illustration. In the beginning he was entirely dependent on sales to Once a Week, Good Words, the occasional Punch cartoon or initial letter.

His first contribution to Punch was a single-panel design published October 6, 1860. Du Maurier used himself, the painter Whistler, T.R. Lamont, and the photographer Herbert Watkins as models for the characters. He was to continue this practice, using his own wife, children, friends and dogs as models for his cartoons. Portrayals of “Mr. and Mrs. Tom Tit” and “Tom Noddy” were based on du Maurier and his family. Du Maurier was still a freelance, hoping for a staff job at Punch, and used Whistler’s image again in a tiny caricature initial letter “Q.” 


It was not until John Leech lay dying in 1864 that du Maurier became a full-fledged member of the Punch staff. He was proposed by Tenniel and Keene and accepted on November 1, 1864, immediately taking over John Leech’s job designing the cartoons for the latest Punch’s Almanack. “Don’t do funny things,” advised Mark Lemon, “do the graceful side of life; be the tenor in Punch’s opera-bouffe.”


The majority of du Maurier’s cartoons were single-panel jokes which took place in the drawing rooms of the upper-middle classes and outdoor scenes on country estates. There was another side to his art, strip-like panels based on dreams and nightmares. Henry James Jr. wrote in 1888, in The Century, that 

“we fancy him much more easily representing quiet, harmonious things than depicting deeds of violence. It is a noticeable fact that in “Punch,” where he has his liberty, he very seldom represents such deeds. His occasional departure from this habit are of a sportive and fantastic sort, in which he ceases to pretend to be real; like the dream of the timorous Jenkins (February 15, 1868), who sees himself hurled to destruction by a colossal, foreshortened cab-horse. Du Maurier’s fantastic – we speak of the extreme manifestations of it – is always admirable, ingenious, unexpected, pictorial; so much so, that we have often wondered that he should not have cultivated this vein more largely.”



George du Maurier achieved fame as a writer with two novels that had dreamlike qualities; Peter Ibbetson (1891) and Trilby (1894). A third novel, The Martian, was being serialized in Harper’s when du Maurier died in London, on October 8, 1896, of heart and lung weaknesses, probably brought on by his excessive lifelong nicotine habit.



Friday, March 16, 2012

Saturday, March 10, 2012

Tom Noddy’s Christmas Nightmare 1891 [1]

Yesterday’s Papers. Today’s Views.
Beginning our series is
Huib van Opstal, from the Netherlands.

“Repeats abound. Eyeballs popped out in a hip Dream of the Rarebit Fiend page by Winsor McCay in 1906, and eyeballs popped out in a hip “Big Daddy” Ed Roth drawing from the 1960s. It probably does not make McCay the inventor of this gag though. Ideas go back like falling dominoes. Ideas are often like ticks in a row. Two examples showing close resemblances for instance, are probably just a link in a chain which, no doubt, and in due time, will prove to be much, much longer. Ideas can go way back, and can easily circle the world. For example, when Winsor McCay published a weird Rarebit episode solely filled with offensive violence, in 1906, the Spaniards Luis Buñuel and Salvador Dali respectively were only six and two years young. But uncontestedly, their 1930 surrealistic short film L’Age d’Or, was scripted from A to Z from this strip episode. American newspapers reached Spain too, an early Spanish Blackbeard may have saved the strips in them. There’s plenty of work to do for researchers...”

 [ As I said about dream strips, in a 2008 review HERE. ]

 George du Maurier strip, engraved by Swain Sc
  
In 2007 I was delighted by a huge book plus DVD, republishing Winsor McCay’s complete Dream of the Rarebit Fiend strips by German researcher Ulrich Merkl. Then, in early January 2012, Belgian-French researcher Thierry Smolderen surprised us all with his unveiling of old strips he found in The Graphic and The Illustrated London News magazines. A pile of long forgotten, realistically drawn pages, by different artists from the Victorian age. Well done realism in strips – long believed absent –, finally back on our radar! Thierry’s recent thrilling announcement of it in Yesterday’s Papers can be read HERE.

Shortly afterwards, a super enthusiastic Thierry showed a kaleidoscope of samples at the Platinum Afternoon, a public presentation at this year’s Angoulême Festival international de la bande dessinée 39, in France.
 
 Four pages of “Tom Noddy’s...”

Beautiful samples they were, and some of them gloriously coloured too. To me it felt like a wake-up call. Back at work again, only weeks later, serendipity was in the air when I suddenly spotted these flying leaves. Four old pages out of Punchs Almanack published in late 1891, with an amazingly weird dream strip about a certain “Tom Noddy”, a barefoot dreamer with umbrella, dressed only in his top hat, pince-nez, white nightshirt and Jägers, cigar-smoking, absentmindedly roaming the muddy streets of a dark and sinister London, full of graphic visual effects...  
A strip written and drawn by George du Maurier (1834-1896), in fourteen drawings with numbered cryptic captions, fully titled “Tom Noddy’s Christmas Nightmare, After Cold Mince-Pies for Supper.
George du Maurier
Printed in two separate (!) parts, in the opening section of The Christmas Number of Punch and Punch’s Almanack for 1892, published in London, Great Britain. Foreshadowing Richard Outcault’s The Yellow Kid (1895) by four years. Foreshadowing Winsor McCay’s Dream of the Rarebit Fiend (1904) by thirteen years, and his Little Nemo in Slumberland (1905) by fourteen.
Young American authors Outcault and McCay both saw and read this surrealistic strip, I think. Issues and bound volumes of Punch were spread worldwide from day one. Artists and painters in the Victorian age loved illustrated magazines for inspiration. Struggling young Dutch artist Vincent van Gogh even built private shows in his room with the hundreds of pages he saved from The Graphic and The Illustrated London News.


Is Tom Noddy’s (1891) by George du Maurier a seminal work in the history of pictorial storytelling? Yes, it is. Plus, comparing the original pen and ink drawings signed “du Maurier” with the printed engravings signed “SWAIN SC” is truly awesome!

Tom Noddy’s Christmas Nightmare, first panel
  Dream of the Rarebit Fiend, last panel
Do see the final two pages of Tom Noddy’s Christmas Nightmare here soon – plus more info on various aspects of this story. Below is the first installment of two pages. 

Huib van Opstal

Tom Noddy, page one
 Original pen and ink drawing, fifth panel
  Tom Noddy, page two