[go: up one dir, main page]

Activity for ehaupt

  • ehaupt ehaupt modified a comment on ticket #299

    The FreeBSD ports framework applies some additional macros. The entire magic is in: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11-fm/xfe The patches in files/ have already been reported and incorporated (separate PR). Have a look at the Makefile: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11-fm/xfe/Makefile The USES macros do some magic. The ones addressing the issues you're seeing are probably: localbase (adding -I${PREFIX}/include) to CFLAGS (3rd party libraries on FreeBSD are per default under /usr/local/include...

  • ehaupt ehaupt modified a comment on ticket #299

    The FreeBSD ports framework applies some additional macros. The entire magic is in: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11-fm/xfe The patches in files/ have already been reported and incorporated (separate PR). Have a look at the Makefile: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11-fm/xfe/Makefile The USES macros do some magic. The ones addressing the issues you're seeing are probably: localbase (adding -I${PREFIX}/include) to CFLAGS (3rd party libraries on FreeBSD are per default under /usr/local/include...

  • ehaupt ehaupt posted a comment on ticket #299

    In the FreeBSD ports framework applies some additional macros. The entire magic is in: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11-fm/xfe The patches in files/ have already been reported and incorporated (separate PR). Have a look at the Makefile: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/x11-fm/xfe/Makefile The USES macros do some magic. The ones addressing the issues you're seeing are probably: localbase (adding -I${PREFIX}/include) to CFLAGS (3rd party libraries on FreeBSD are per default under /usr/local/include...

  • ehaupt ehaupt modified a comment on ticket #299

    Hello @baudinr, thanks for looking into it. I can confirm that your pre-version 2.1.1 solves the compiler issue. The error in your screenshot comes from the usage of bsd make (make) instead of gmake. The ports framework is taking care of this with the gmake USES macro.

  • ehaupt ehaupt posted a comment on ticket #299

    Hello @baudinr, thanks for looking into it. I can confirm that your pre-version 2.1.1 solves the compiler issue. The error in your screenshot comes from the usage of bsd make (make) instead of gmake. The ports framework is taking care of this with the gmake USES macro.

  • ehaupt ehaupt created ticket #299

    xfe 2.1 fails to compile on FreeBSD 14.2 due to undefined identifiers

  • ehaupt ehaupt created ticket #296

    Fix build of 2.0.1 on FreeBSD

  • ehaupt ehaupt committed [bc857e] on xmp-cli

    Unfortunately configure assumes it is only available on OpenBSD. Modify

  • ehaupt ehaupt posted a comment on ticket #59

    Here's what I get (attachment). Definitely looks like more work is needed for 5.0. Close this PR, open a new one titled "[Feature Request] support bash 5.0"?

  • ehaupt ehaupt posted a comment on ticket #59

    You'll also have to re-generate 'configure' with the autotools, but once you have you'll get (see attachment). Make check does not finish. It hangs after: make check-TESTS PASS: test-bug-step-subshell PASS: test-bug-set-e PASS: test-complete PASS: test-debug PASS: test-delete PASS: test-export SKIP: test-file-with-spaces PASS: test-info-args Pressing ^C - t you get: load: 0.43 cmd: sleep 44574 [nanslp] 0.52r 0.00u 0.00s 0% 2132k make: Working in: /usr/ports/devel/bashdb/work/bashdb-4.4-1.0.1 make[1]:...

  • ehaupt ehaupt created ticket #59

    Add support for bash 5.0

  • ehaupt ehaupt created ticket #5

    2.4.23 fails to build with OpenSSL 1.1.1

1