Menu
▾
▴
re2c-general — For discussion of re2c
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(48) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
|
Apr
(9) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(20) |
Jun
|
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(60) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
(2) |
15
(2) |
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
(1) |
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
(1) |
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-11-28 10:03:37
|
Bugs item #2102138, was opened at 2008-09-09 16:28 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by helly You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616200&aid=2102138&group_id=96864 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Interface (example) Group: v1.0 (example) >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Marcus Börger (helly) Summary: Duplicate case labels on EBCDIC Initial Comment: Problem submitted by: wh...@uk... Hi All, I using re2c version 0.13.5 and I am seeing a problem that looks very similar to tracker 11711240 which I believe is fixed in 0.13.5. Another EBCDIC issue was fixed a few days ago (2038610) but this appears related to the -w option which I am not using. When I run re2c with the -e option I get lots of errors when compiling the resulting C file on z/OS because a generated switch contains duplicate case labels e.g I get case labels for '"' and 0x7F as in 11711240. The cmd line I am using is re2c -d -b -e -o <output file> <input file> I attach the src .re file which is from PHP 5.2 (php.net/src/ext/date/lib/parse_date.re). I can send the resulting .c file and the compiler output if you need it. Thanks Andy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Börger (helly) Date: 2008-11-28 11:03 Message: Many thanks to you Andy for verifying this fix. So at least the cross-compilation is working now. Unfortunately that does not mean native compilation on EBCDIC machines will work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-09-15 11:57 Message: Hi Marcus Did you receive the extra artifacts OK ? Regards Andy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-09-11 14:10 Message: Hi Marcus, I could not upload extra artifacts so have sent then via email to he...@us.... Regards, Andy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Marcus Börger (helly) Date: 2008-09-10 11:38 Message: Please send the .c and the compiler messages as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616200&aid=2102138&group_id=96864 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-11-23 18:17:28
|
Bugs item #2186718, was opened at 2008-10-22 14:24 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by helly You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616200&aid=2186718&group_id=96864 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Marcus Börger (helly) Summary: unescaped backslash in file name of #line directive Initial Comment: To reproduce run re2c on a Windows machine and specify input and output files using full paths (with path components separated by '\'), e.g. re2c -o c:\temp\calc_001.c c:\temp\calc_001.re In the output file some #line directive will look like #line 1 "c:\temp\calc_001.re" with '\' not escaped and some with '\' escaped as in #line 24 "c:\\temp\\calc_001.c" I believe that paths should be escaped in both cases. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616200&aid=2186718&group_id=96864 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-11-15 20:11:40
|
Feature Requests item #2285598, was opened at 2008-11-14 19:52 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by helly You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616203&aid=2285598&group_id=96864 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Priority: 1 Private: No Submitted By: Rui Maciel (rui_maciel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Support for POSIX character classes Initial Comment: It would be great if re2c supported POSIX character classes, which would help simplify and unclutter some lexer specifications. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Börger (helly) Date: 2008-11-15 21:11 Message: You can easily do that yourself: DIGIT = [0-9]; DIGITS = DIGIT+; HEXDIGIT = DIGIT | [a-fA-F]; HEXDIGITS = HEXDIGIT+; etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616203&aid=2285598&group_id=96864 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-11-15 20:09:39
|
Feature Requests item #2286921, was opened at 2008-11-15 00:01 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by helly You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616203&aid=2286921&group_id=96864 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed >Priority: 1 Private: No Submitted By: Rui Maciel (rui_maciel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Source code lacks comments Initial Comment: The source code currently available in the trunk has only 140 comments among 7686 lines of code. The lack of comments, along with cryptic method names, means that it is needlessly hard to understand what is being done by the code. It would be nice if the code had more comments explaining the purpose of the methods and functions being used, along with brief explanations of what is being performed in some sections of the code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Marcus Börger (helly) Date: 2008-11-15 21:09 Message: I'd be happy to apply any patches for comments you provide. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616203&aid=2286921&group_id=96864 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-11-14 23:01:15
|
Feature Requests item #2286921, was opened at 2008-11-14 23:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616203&aid=2286921&group_id=96864 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rui Maciel (rui_maciel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Source code lacks comments Initial Comment: The source code currently available in the trunk has only 140 comments among 7686 lines of code. The lack of comments, along with cryptic method names, means that it is needlessly hard to understand what is being done by the code. It would be nice if the code had more comments explaining the purpose of the methods and functions being used, along with brief explanations of what is being performed in some sections of the code. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616203&aid=2286921&group_id=96864 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-11-14 18:52:29
|
Feature Requests item #2285598, was opened at 2008-11-14 18:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616203&aid=2285598&group_id=96864 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Rui Maciel (rui_maciel) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Support for POSIX character classes Initial Comment: It would be great if re2c supported POSIX character classes, which would help simplify and unclutter some lexer specifications. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=616203&aid=2285598&group_id=96864 |