Yeah, I'm looking into it. The problem right now is that
the BioPerl infrastructure doesn't quite support hmmpfam
results at all, so we're lucky we get anything at all.
BioPerl is *supposed* to have this sorted automatically, but
obviously that function of BioPerl doesn't work in this case.
It might be possible to manually sort the results, but I'm
skeptical.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
This would be nice, but is greatly complicated by the current embryonic
state of hmmpfam support for BioPerl. For the moment, it probably
make sense our friends at BioPerl to upgrade their module. Currently in
CCT users can set an evalue cutoff, which gives them a lot of control of
what they look at.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1058673
Yeah, I'm looking into it. The problem right now is that
the BioPerl infrastructure doesn't quite support hmmpfam
results at all, so we're lucky we get anything at all.
BioPerl is *supposed* to have this sorted automatically, but
obviously that function of BioPerl doesn't work in this case.
It might be possible to manually sort the results, but I'm
skeptical.
Logged In: YES
user_id=834743
This would be nice, but is greatly complicated by the current embryonic
state of hmmpfam support for BioPerl. For the moment, it probably
make sense our friends at BioPerl to upgrade their module. Currently in
CCT users can set an evalue cutoff, which gives them a lot of control of
what they look at.