Re: [LogiLogi-list] 2 serious bugs

Yo, I arrived in the youthostel in York today. Had a walk over the
city-walls this afternoon & visited a small museum on king Richard
the IIIrd & the murder on 2 princes he was said to have committed.
Besides that I've been thinking about a lot of things again.

I respond here to some TODO's from the Big Mail.

> == Query Vs. Dir structure This was brought back in my last
> large-mail about the new UI proposal [0] in the section "Navigation
> bar - too many tags". Basically, I tihnk we should opt for one way
> or the other but both the same, in the url and search bar and I
> believe the Query to be the most intuitive one.

This is, I think something about which I think that it is quite
central to LogiLogi. This because using tags as a dir-like-
structure allows for defining and using words in context. The
History/Aristotle -> Aristotle if History/Aristotle does not exist
- dynamic links thing. Especially for elaborations this is really 
important...

This was one of the features asked for by the philosophers, and one of
the features that seems quite usefull to me.

But indeed it & link resolving may need some more work maybe to make it better.
For example when adding links maybe the tags of the logi to which they are
added should be there by default.

---

I created a logi on separating dimensions:
http://en.logilogi.org/Logi_Logi/Separating_Dimensions=Wybo_Wiersma_17

And one on the split-up into seperate services:
http://en.logilogi.org/Logi_Logi/Separating_Services=Wybo_Wiersma_19

---

> added note: just now I came across this:
> http://www.me.com/unsupported_browser/en/ (I can't enter the site as
> it doesn't recognize iceweasel as a firefox-like browser, and it
> would not work with IE either)

Can't open it either with FF2 while it says it should be able to.

---

> [0] http://logilogi.wiki.sourceforge.net/UI+analysis - The lists
> font sizes are decreased each list-level so it's not very clear...

Indeed, they get quite small, but still readable; especially with a
few Ctrl ++'s :)

> take a look at it at the GUI editor mode... I also thought about
> starting to use LL as the development wiki, through a
> LL-dev-peergroup... what do you all think about this?

I think for now we can very well keep dev-related stuff that is 
non-philosophical on SF & on the list. As LL is more for the long
term kind of stuff.

I will do the other TODO's soon,

Wybo