Re: [LogiLogi-list] Various notes

Wybo, thank you very much for your reply, I know you're short of time.

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Wybo Wiersma <wy...@lo...> wrote:
>
>> = Best practices
>> phenomena can be functional" logis... I see a logi truncated looses
>> the concept of LogiLogi... what do you think?
>
> Agree.
>
Well, by now we could solve it with comment-logis or remarks at least
to connect them.

>> I'm working on another approach that will come along my UI proposal.
>
> Will see it, looking forward to it :)

I'll commit them soon... I just don't want to commit with so
unfinished parts as it's now...

>> = Remarks reply
> That would reintroduce threads, no remarks are just for short shouts.
>
I see we could give space to threaded-remarks to allow discussion that
would not fit on a logi... we'll see what the need is on the go.


>
> --- WOOOT :)
>
> Richard Stallmann entered the building while I was typing a reply!
>
> Very weird, to see a person like him for the first time in one's life... :)
>

Wow, those sort of things are what makes our world smaller and our mind bigger.

>> = Webs
>> I've found this project [1] which looks very interesting and has a
>> different approach but similar purpose to logilogi.
>
> Is slightly interesting indeed, although I already knew it and it works with
> propositions and they claim they are having/wanting software-patents to it, so
> I dont like it that much...
>
ouch, software-patents for propositional logic? crazy.

>
> I am currently cleaning some stuff up in preparation for the replacement of the
> front-page might do a test-version of that some time in the coming days.
>

Looking foward this :)

later.

-- 
Bruno