Remove timestamp from man pages for reproducibility
Build failed. Outdated config.guess and config.sub file in the last release of Judy.
I have reported my 3 patches here today and notice this ticket also exists in the same areas I have been working. I am unable to access the gentoo patch at this time. If someone reads this maybe this is of some help to them in the future. My version of this fix is up at: https://github.com/dlmiles/libjudy/commit/fb71440179e4ac794b589d37d3825f9f8422d315 This has also be attached to sourceforge judy project Ticket#6 as file 0002: doc/Makefile.am: mkdir -p man/man3 and parallel building in CI This corrects...
3 patches included
JudySL and JudyHS efficiency
undefined behavior in Judy1Set.c
Sergei: I cannot reproduce this problem in either Judy-1.0.4 or judy-1.0.5 on my 64 bit Ubuntu system. However, it appears this bug was reported on the Judy-1.0.4 release. Perhaps it was fixed on the judy-1.0.5 release. That release has the same files under the src directory. It was done to only fix some build/make problems. I do not know what a "Parallel build" is, so that may be the why the problem appears. Judy is still a "hobby" for me. If would like to help you. Can you please tell me about...
Parallel build fails on manpage generation: make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'man/man3/JSLD', needed by 'all-am'. Stop.
Bobby: This "fix" on sourceforge was temporary until the Bug iin gcc was fixed. That was several years agoWe know the code is very old and needs an update. We are very active on that front. Doug, Doug Baskins dougbaskins@yahoo.com On Friday, November 30, 2018, 8:20:32 PM MST, Bobby Fraser <burningmime@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: Oops, this appears to be a dupe of https://sourceforge.net/p/judy/bugs/25/ ; the patch there fixed the problem. [bugs:#28] Judy1 on 64-bit producing nonsense values Status:...
Oops, this appears to be a dupe of https://sourceforge.net/p/judy/bugs/25/ ; the patch there fixed the problem.
Judy1 on 64-bit producing nonsense values
Destructors for JudyHS
Hello Doug, The patch works nicely. Thanks a lot. Judy array is amazing. Regards,...
Thanks, it fixes my problem.
Armin: The enclosed patched JudyPrivateBranch.h file will allow GCC to compile Judy...
I have a similar problem where I make a Judy1 array containing 1770 bits (whose indexes...
Guillaume: The enclosed patched JudyPrivateBranch.h file will allow GCC to compile...
Judy1 bug with gcc 4.9 O1/O2