|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2012-11-30 14:02:08
|
Plugin Bugs item #3589470, was opened at 2012-11-23 13:44 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bobhwasatch You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=565475&aid=3589470&group_id=588 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Bob Hauck (bobhwasatch) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Commando vs gcc 4.7.2 Initial Comment: Error message parsing for gcc 4.7.2 on Debian appears to be slightly broken. The brief format for gcc errors and warnings looks like "file:line:column: error|warning: message". Neither the "generic" regex nor the "Emacs" one quite match this and as a result all gcc errors and warnings are passed to ErrorList as errors. Suggest new regex for gcc error parsing: Error: (.+):(\d+):\d+: (?:error|Error): (.+) Warning: (.+):(\d+):\d+: (?:warning|Warning): (.+) jEdit 5.0, Console 5.0, Debian Linux Wheezy 64-bit, Java 1.6.0_24. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Bob Hauck (bobhwasatch) Date: 2012-11-30 06:02 Message: I am not aware of GCC producing multi-line error messages for the C compiler. It may do so for C++ or Ada or something, but I don't use those. Also, the regex that I suggested work with gcc 4.7, but not with older versions that don't provide the column number. So I think I need to do more testing to ensure that the regex works for both styles. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alan Ezust (ezust) Date: 2012-11-27 21:59 Message: Is there an "extra lines" regexp for this also? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=565475&aid=3589470&group_id=588 |