[go: up one dir, main page]

Menu

#70 reformat.sh producing output with 4 reads having the same id

1.0
closed
nobody
None
2025-01-15
2024-11-01
No

samtools fastq 10ng-TS-2.100k.bam \
| reformat.sh in=stdin.fq interleaved=true out=stdout.sam samplerate=1 sampleseed=4 forcetrimright=98 \
| samtools view -@3 -b - -o 10ng-TS-2.100k.99bp.bam

This produces an invalid output bam with a sneaky but that I did not detect until attemptint to realign these reads (dups were silently dropped).

I also tried 0.999999 for the samplerate, which produced the same invalid bam.

$ samtools view 10ng-TS-2.100k.bam  | grep  A00336:A00336:HCVHJDMXX:2:2488:7835:5353
A00336:A00336:HCVHJDMXX:2:2488:7835:5353        1187    chr1    517107  0       101M    =       517212  206     CACAATAAAAAATAATATCTAAAACTCAAATATATTAAAATCCCCATACCTAAACTATAAATACTAAATAAAATTTACTTATCCATCCATTTTCTATATTC   FFFFF:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF,::FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF:FFFFFFF:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF,FFFFFFFF:FF  NM:i:0  MD:Z:101        AS:i:101        XS:i:101        RG:Z:TGACCAATTCTTTCCC   YC:Z:GA YD:Z:r
A00336:A00336:HCVHJDMXX:2:2488:7835:5353        1107    chr1    517212  0       101M    =       517107  -206    ACTAAAAAACTAAAAACAATACTTATTCTCAAAAAAATCTTCAACTTAAATAACTCTATAAAAAAAAAATTACATCATTAAAAAATCATCGCAAATCAAAT   FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF,FFFFFFFFFF  NM:i:0  MD:Z:101        AS:i:101        XS:i:101        RG:Z:TGACCAATTCTTTCCC   YC:Z:CT YD:Z:r
$ samtools view 10ng-TS-2.100k.99bp.bam  | grep  A00336:A00336:HCVHJDMXX:2:2488:7835:5353
A00336:A00336:HCVHJDMXX:2:2488:7835:5353        77      *       0       0       *       *       0       0       CACAATAAAAAATAATATCTAAAACTCAAATATATTAAAATCCCCATACCTAAACTATAAATACTAAATAAAATTTACTTATCCATCCATTTTCTATAT     FFFFF:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF,::FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF:FFFFFFF:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF,FFFFFFFF:
A00336:A00336:HCVHJDMXX:2:2488:7835:5353        141     *       0       0       *       *       0       0       TTTTTTTGAGAATAAGTATTGTTTTTAGTTTTTTAGTGTTGGAATATAGAAAATGGATGGATAAGTAAATTTTATTTAGTATTTATAGTTTAGGTATGG     FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
A00336:A00336:HCVHJDMXX:2:2488:7835:5353        77      *       0       0       *       *       0       0       ATTTGATTTGCGATGATTTTTTAATGATGTAATTTTTTTTTTATAGAGTTATTTAAGTTGAAGATTTTTTTGAGAATAAGTATTGTTTTTAGTTTTTTA     FFFFFFFFFF,FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
A00336:A00336:HCVHJDMXX:2:2488:7835:5353        141     *       0       0       *       *       0       0       ATATAAGCCACCTCACCTAACCTACAACAATTTTTCAATAATATAATTTCTCTTTTACAAAACCACCTAAACTAAAAATTCCCTTAAAAACAAATACTA     FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF,FF:FFF,FFFFFFF,FFFFFFFF:FFFFFFFFFFFFF
1 Attachments

Discussion

  • Brian Bushnell

    Brian Bushnell - 2025-01-15

    Hmmm... looks like the issue here is that the intermediate fastq file is not really interleaved. Sam/bam files are not interleaved in the first place and should never be treated as such; the order of records is arbitrary and reformatting them as fastq (with samtools) doesn't change that. If you force Reformat to process a noninterleaved file as interleaved, strange things will happen; in this case, the records for that pair are nonadjacent and that causes the header replication, as per the sam specification (pairs have to get the same header in sam output even if they had different headers in fastq format).

    Anyway, this operation works as expected as long as the interleaved flag is correctly set to false.

     
  • Brian Bushnell

    Brian Bushnell - 2025-01-15
    • status: open --> closed
     

Log in to post a comment.