You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(34) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
(1) |
13
(2) |
14
|
15
|
16
(1) |
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
From: Yannick .D. <y.d...@gm...> - 2016-09-16 03:31:55
|
Hello Nina, Hello Nick, I will do so. I was afraid I would have to write two different SMIRKS as a solution, as this might significantly increase the total number of SMIRKS in my system. Again, thanks a lot. Best regards, Yannick On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:09 AM, Nikolay Kochev <ni...@un...> wrote: > Dear Yannick > If you need to transform/remove/add H atoms in Ambit-SMART it can be done > only treating them as explicit H atoms. The SMIRKS must define explicitly > what happens with each H atom. > > The indicated implicit H atoms are used only for defining logical > expression in order to match the substructure (target fragment) that is to > be transformed according to the SMIRKS. > > Here I suggest to you a working solution based on explicit H atoms: > > (1) First you need two different SMIRKS for both cases since the H atom > configuration is different (It is impossible with explicit H managing to > handle both cases with a single SMIRKS): > > (2) Secondly your target molecule must be set with explicit H atoms > > (3) here are the SMIRKS for both cases: > > [#6;A;H2X4:7]([H:99])([H])!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5][P;X4: > 4]([#8;X2:2])([#8;A;X2:3][H])=[O;X1:1]>>[#8;X2:2][P;X4:4]1(= > [O;X1:1])[#8;A;X:3][#6;A;H1X4:7]([H:99])!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5]1 > > [#6;A;H2X4:7]([H:99])([H])!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5][P;X4: > 4]([#8;X2:2])([#8;A;X1-:3])=[O;X1:1]>>[#8;X2:2][P;X4:4]1(=[ > O;X1:1])[#8;A;X:3][#6;A;H1X4:7]([H:99])!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5]1 > > Notice that also the explicit H atoms are treated on atom 7 > [#6;A;H2X4:7]([H:99])([H]) because when you close the ring one of the H > atoms must be removed (i.e. this is the unmapped H atom) the other H atom > stays (i.e. this is the mapped H atom: [H:99]) > > > With best regards > Nick > > > > > > On 9/12/16 22:29, Yannick .Djoumbou wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Yannick .Djoumbou <y.d...@gm...> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have some issues with my SMIRKS manager. >> have written the SMIKRS below that I am applying on one compounds: >> >> [#6;A;H2X4:7]!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5][P;X4:4]([#8;X2:2]) >> ([#8;A;X2H1,X1-:3])=[O;X1:1]>>[#8;X2:2][P;X4:4]1(=[O;X1:1])[ >> #8;A;X:3][#6;A;H1X4:7]!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5]1 >> >> >> I am trying to join two atoms here to form a cycle, The C7 and the O3. In >> the reactant, O3 can be linked to a Hydrogen atom (case 1) or can be >> negatively charged (case 2). The problem is that in the product, the O3 has >> a valence of 3 (with an implicit H) (case 1), or a valence of 2 (case 2). >> >> The examples are illustrated in the attached file. >> >> >> Could anyone help? >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> Regards, >> > > > |
|
From: Nikolay K. <ni...@un...> - 2016-09-13 08:25:12
|
Dear Yannick If you need to transform/remove/add H atoms in Ambit-SMART it can be done only treating them as explicit H atoms. The SMIRKS must define explicitly what happens with each H atom. The indicated implicit H atoms are used only for defining logical expression in order to match the substructure (target fragment) that is to be transformed according to the SMIRKS. Here I suggest to you a working solution based on explicit H atoms: (1) First you need two different SMIRKS for both cases since the H atom configuration is different (It is impossible with explicit H managing to handle both cases with a single SMIRKS): (2) Secondly your target molecule must be set with explicit H atoms (3) here are the SMIRKS for both cases: [#6;A;H2X4:7]([H:99])([H])!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5][P;X4:4]([#8;X2:2])([#8;A;X2:3][H])=[O;X1:1]>>[#8;X2:2][P;X4:4]1(=[O;X1:1])[#8;A;X:3][#6;A;H1X4:7]([H:99])!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5]1 [#6;A;H2X4:7]([H:99])([H])!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5][P;X4:4]([#8;X2:2])([#8;A;X1-:3])=[O;X1:1]>>[#8;X2:2][P;X4:4]1(=[O;X1:1])[#8;A;X:3][#6;A;H1X4:7]([H:99])!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5]1 Notice that also the explicit H atoms are treated on atom 7 [#6;A;H2X4:7]([H:99])([H]) because when you close the ring one of the H atoms must be removed (i.e. this is the unmapped H atom) the other H atom stays (i.e. this is the mapped H atom: [H:99]) With best regards Nick On 9/12/16 22:29, Yannick .Djoumbou wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Yannick .Djoumbou > <y.d...@gm... <mailto:y.d...@gm...>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have some issues with my SMIRKS manager. > have written the SMIKRS below that I am applying on one compounds: > > [#6;A;H2X4:7]!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5][P;X4:4]([#8;X2:2])([#8;A;X2H1,X1-:3])=[O;X1:1]>>[#8;X2:2][P;X4:4]1(=[O;X1:1])[#8;A;X:3][#6;A;H1X4:7]!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5]1 > > > I am trying to join two atoms here to form a cycle, The C7 and the > O3. In the reactant,O3 can be linked to a Hydrogen atom (case 1) > or can be negatively charged (case 2). The problem is that in the > product, the O3 has a valence of 3 (with an implicit H) (case 1), > or a valence of 2 (case 2). > > The examples are illustrated in the attached file. > > > Could anyone help? > > > Thanks. > > > Regards, > > |
|
From: Nina J. <jel...@gm...> - 2016-09-13 05:13:20
|
Yannick, Could you please file an issue https://sourceforge.net/p/ambit/bugs/ if not already. SMIRKS processing has number of updates and cleanups since this spring, do try to use the version in trunk 3.0.3-SNAPSHOT. Best regards, Nina On 12 September 2016 at 22:29, Yannick .Djoumbou <y.d...@gm...> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Yannick .Djoumbou <y.d...@gm...> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have some issues with my SMIRKS manager. >> have written the SMIKRS below that I am applying on one compounds: >> >> [#6;A;H2X4:7]!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5][P;X4:4]([#8;X2:2]) >> ([#8;A;X2H1,X1-:3])=[O;X1:1]>>[#8;X2:2][P;X4:4]1(=[O;X1:1])[ >> #8;A;X:3][#6;A;H1X4:7]!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5]1 >> >> >> I am trying to join two atoms here to form a cycle, The C7 and the O3. In >> the reactant, O3 can be linked to a Hydrogen atom (case 1) or can be >> negatively charged (case 2). The problem is that in the product, the O3 has >> a valence of 3 (with an implicit H) (case 1), or a valence of 2 (case 2). >> >> The examples are illustrated in the attached file. >> >> >> Could anyone help? >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> Regards, >> > > |
|
From: Yannick .D. <y.d...@gm...> - 2016-09-12 19:29:14
|
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Yannick .Djoumbou <y.d...@gm...> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have some issues with my SMIRKS manager. > have written the SMIKRS below that I am applying on one compounds: > > [#6;A;H2X4:7]!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5][P;X4:4]([#8;X2:2]) > ([#8;A;X2H1,X1-:3])=[O;X1:1]>>[#8;X2:2][P;X4:4]1(=[O;X1:1])[ > #8;A;X:3][#6;A;H1X4:7]!@-[#6;A;H2X4:6]!@-[#8;X2:5]1 > > > I am trying to join two atoms here to form a cycle, The C7 and the O3. In > the reactant, O3 can be linked to a Hydrogen atom (case 1) or can be > negatively charged (case 2). The problem is that in the product, the O3 has > a valence of 3 (with an implicit H) (case 1), or a valence of 2 (case 2). > > The examples are illustrated in the attached file. > > > Could anyone help? > > > Thanks. > > > Regards, > |