[Vis5d-users] Bug in "vis5d_verylarge_mode" ?

  Althought I have tried, I still cant draw the other frames,
  only the first one.
   I have tried the following:

               vis5d_verylarge_mode $ctx VIS5D_ON
               vis5d_set_isosurface $ctx 0 0
               vis5d_make_isosurface $ctx 0 0 0
               vis5d_set_timestep $ctx 0
               vis5d_set_timestep $ctx 0
               vis5d_make_timestep_graphics $ctx 0
               vis5d_draw_frame 0

   It only works if I dont use very_large_mode, and if the dataset
  is smaller than my RAM.


   thanks for your help

   Jose Melo


 On Tue, 28 May 2002, Don Middleton wrote:

>  Below is an excerpt from a very-large-mode animation script for 4.3
where
> vis5d_set_timestep and vis5d_make_timestep_graphics are used to
accomplish
 what I think it is you're having trouble with.

> don
>
> proc next_frame {ctx time doit} {
>         global doSave doStereo baseName frame extName format totalFrames
> dirName
>
>         vis5d_set_timestep $ctx $time
>
> # Don't create or render the bulk of the geometry in test mode
>
>         rendermode $ctx $doit
>         if {$doit} {
>                 vis5d_make_timestep_graphics $ctx $time
>         }
>
> Subject: Bug in "vis5d_verylarge_mode" ?
>
>
> >   Hi
> >
> >   Im using the vis5D API to draw isosurfaces and colored isosurfaces,
when
> >  I use the API vis5d_set_isosurface_color_var_and_owner, Vis5D draws
all
> >  the frames, instead of drawing only the n-th frame.
> >
> >   To solve this problem I use the API "vis5d_verylarge_mode 0
VIS5D_ON"
> and
> >  it works fine, because when I call
> > vis5d_set_isosurface_color_var_and_owner
> >  it only draws the desired frame; the problem is when I want to draw
the
> >  next frame ((n+1)-th frame), it does nothing...
> >  (Vis5D thinks the values are in memory ?)
> >
> >   I also tried the API vis5d_destroy_data_context
> >   and vis5d_destroy_display_context but without sucess.
> >
> >   Does anybody have the same problem? Is this a bug, or Im using it in
the
> >   wrong way?
> >
> >
> >   Thank you very much for your attention
> >
> >   Jose Melo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>