towhee-users Mailing List for MCCCS Towhee
Brought to you by:
marcus_martin
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(17) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(8) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(6) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
(1) |
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
(2) |
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
(1) |
27
(2) |
|
28
|
29
(1) |
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
From: Dongsheng Z. <zhd...@gm...> - 2008-12-29 18:57:50
|
Hi towhee users,
I would like to use towhee package. However, I have some difficulties to
compile the current package. When I try to compile it, I got several errors.
First, I got some error massages regarding to engatom.F:
engatom.F: In subroutine `twh_engatom':
engatom.F:26:
& ,lnbterm,dimatoms,dimtrials,rxp,ryp,rzp,vctry,vtrext
1
engatom.F:66: (continued):
dimension lnbterm(dimtrials)
2
Invalid declaration of or reference to symbol `dimtrials' at (2) [initially
seen at (1)]
engatom.F:26:
& ,lnbterm,dimatoms,dimtrials,rxp,ryp,rzp,vctry,vtrext
1
After I checked engatom.F, I think I need to move "integer
dimatoms,dimtrials" from line 70 to line 65 because we need to declare the
variable type before we use that variable. Another same type error message
suggest me move "integer dimatoms,dimtrials" from line 176 to line 171.
After these two modification, I got other error messages as:
allocate.o(.text+0x1f): In function `twh_allocate_eam__':
/home/dong/sourceFiles/towhee-6.1.4/Source/allocate.F:39: undefined
reference to `twh_eam_rho_real__'
I believe this error message is related to the hybridization of fortran code
and c code. Could you please tell me how to fix it? Thank you for your help
in advance!
Happy holiday!
Dongsheng
|
|
From: Marcus M. <mar...@us...> - 2008-12-27 03:09:39
|
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Babak Fazel <bk...@ya...> wrote: > I have run towhee code with the following input file, for an NPT simulation > of methane. Yet my results look to be significantly different from the > corresponding experimental values. Any suggestions on the things which I > might have missed? Sure. You missed performing any volume moves and therefore your simulation is going to be at the vapor volume that you started it at. > initlattice > 'simple cubic' > initmol > 500 > inix iniy iniz > 8 8 8 > hmatrix > 270.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 > 0.0d0 270.0d0 0.0d0 > 0.0d0 0.0d0 270.0d0 That initial box size for 500 molecules is certainly a vapor. > pm1boxcbswap > 0.0d0 > pm1cbswmt > 1.0d0 > pmavb1 > 1.0d0 > pmavb1in > 0.5d0 > pmavb1mt > 1.0d0 > pmavb1ct > 1.0d0 > avb1rad > 20.0d0 By setting pmavb1 to a value of 1.0 you are only performing Aggregation-volume bias moves of type 1. While this is a very nice move for sampling clusters in a vapor, it is not doing anything to sample the volume changes. A more typical single-box NPT simulation would consist of about 1% volume moves, perhaps 5% of each of the aggregation volume bias moves, and the remainder broken up between CBMC, translation, and rotation moves. As you are simulating a monatomic molecule in this particular case there is no need for CBMC or rotation moves. Marcus -- Marcus G. Martin Director, Useful Bias Incorporated 88 Martinez Road Edgewood NM 87015-8222 ph. (505) 286-4457 www.usefulbias.com www.photobirder.com |
|
From: Marcus M. <mar...@us...> - 2008-12-27 03:03:22
|
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:44 AM, naresh nitt <nar...@gm...> wrote: > Dear Towhee users, > I want to run a GCMC simulation by having the adsorbing molecule to > be a rigid molecule. > Is there any way to run a simulation of this sort. If the force field for the molecule is rigid then there is now no problem in running this sort of simulation in the newest versions of the code. If you are using a force field that is flexible, but for some reason feel the need to keep the molecule rigid then GCMC will not work. The only way to do something like that would be a 2-box Gibbs ensemble simulation using only the rotational-bias moves. Marcus -- Marcus G. Martin Director, Useful Bias Incorporated 88 Martinez Road Edgewood NM 87015-8222 ph. (505) 286-4457 www.usefulbias.com www.photobirder.com |
|
From: William K. <wil...@gm...> - 2008-12-26 22:11:26
|
I just wanted to post the following question to the Towhee community, which was sent by a friend mine. Hope someone can help. I have run towhee code with the following input file, for an NPT simulation of methane. Yet my results look to be significantly different from the corresponding experimental values. Any suggestions on the things which I might have missed? Towhee: Experiment: Specific Density (g/ml) 0.00067672 Specific Density (g/ml) 0.43825 Internal Enegry (KJ/mol) -0.1131E+2 Internal Enegry (KJ/mol) -0.603 (Exp. Data Ref: http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/fluid.cgi?T=101&PLow=1&PHigh=1&PInc=1&Digits=5&ID=C74828&Action=Load&Type=IsoTherm&TUnit=K&PUnit=MPa&DUnit=g%2Fml&HUnit=kJ%2Fmol&WUnit=m%2Fs&VisUnit=uPa*s&STUnit=N%2Fm&RefState=DEF ) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- inputformat 'Towhee' randomseed 1302002 random_luxlevel 3 random_allow_restart T ensemble 'npt' temperature 101 pressure 1000.d0 nmolty 1 nmolectyp 500 numboxes 1 stepstyle 'cycles' nstep 10 printfreq 1 blocksize 2 moviefreq 100 backupfreq 1000 runoutput 'full' pdb_output_freq 5 loutdft .false. loutlammps .false. pressurefreq 2 trmaxdispfreq 1000 volmaxdispfreq 1000 chempotperstep 0 potentialstyle 'internal' ffnumber 1 ff_filename /home/Bobby/usr/packages/towhee-6.0.4/ForceFields/towhee_ff_TraPPE-UA classical_potential 'Lennard-Jones' classical_mixrule 'Lorentz-Berthelot' lshift .false. ltailc .true. rmin 1.0d0 rcut 20.0d0 rcutin 5.0d0 electrostatic_form 'none' nfield 0 solvation_style 'none' linit .true. initboxtype 'dimensions' initstyle 'full cbmc' initlattice 'simple cubic' initmol 500 inix iniy iniz 8 8 8 hmatrix 270.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 270.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 270.0d0 pm1boxcbswap 0.0d0 pm1cbswmt 1.0d0 pmavb1 1.0d0 pmavb1in 0.5d0 pmavb1mt 1.0d0 pmavb1ct 1.0d0 avb1rad 20.0d0 pmavb2 0.0d0 pmavb2in 0.5d0 pmavb2mt 1.0d0 pmavb2ct 1.0d0 avb2rad 10.0d0 pmavb3 0.0d0 pmavb3mt 1.0d0 pmavb3ct 1.0d0 avb3rad 10.0d0 pmcb 0.0d0 pmcbmt 1.0d0 pmall 0.0d0 pmback 0.0d0 pmbkmt 1.0d0 pmpivot 0.0d0 pmpivmt 1.0d0 pmconrot 0.0d0 pmcrmt 1.0d0 pmcrback 0.0d0 pmcrbmt 1.0d0 pmplane 0.0d0 pmplanebox 1.0d0 planewidth 3.0d0 pmrow 0.0d0 pmrowbox 1.0d0 rowwidth 3.0d0 pmtraat 0.0d0 pmtamt 1.0d0 rmtraa 0.5d0 tatraa 0.5d0 pmtracm 1.0d0 pmtcmt 1.0d0 rmtrac 0.5d0 tatrac 0.5d0 pmrotate 1.0d0 pmromt 1.0d0 rmrot 0.05d0 tarot 0.5d0 cbmc_style 'coupled-decoupled' coupled_decoupled_form 'Martin and Siepmann JPCB 1999' cbmc_setting_style 'default ideal' #trappe-ua methane input_style 'basic connectivity map' nunit 1 nmaxcbmc 1 lpdbnames F forcefield 'TraPPE-UA' charge_assignment 'manual' unit ntype qqatom 1 'CH4' 0.0d0 vibration 0 improper 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Babak F. <bk...@ya...> - 2008-12-22 14:35:40
|
I have run towhee code with the following input file, for an NPT simulation of methane. Yet my results look to be significantly different from the corresponding experimental values. Any suggestions on the things which I might have missed? Towhee: Experiment: Specific Density (g/ml) 0.00067672 Specific Density (g/ml) 0.43825 Internal Enegry (KJ/mol) -0.1131E+2 Internal Enegry (KJ/mol) -0.603 (Exp. Data Ref: http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/fluid.cgi?T=101&PLow=1&PHigh=1&PInc=1&Digits=5&ID=C74828&Action=Load&Type=IsoTherm&TUnit=K&PUnit=MPa&DUnit=g%2Fml&HUnit=kJ%2Fmol&WUnit=m%2Fs&VisUnit=uPa*s&STUnit=N%2Fm&RefState=DEF) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- inputformat 'Towhee' randomseed 1302002 random_luxlevel 3 random_allow_restart T ensemble 'npt' temperature 101 pressure 1000.d0 nmolty 1 nmolectyp 500 numboxes 1 stepstyle 'cycles' nstep 10 printfreq 1 blocksize 2 moviefreq 100 backupfreq 1000 runoutput 'full' pdb_output_freq 5 loutdft ..false. loutlammps ..false. pressurefreq 2 trmaxdispfreq 1000 volmaxdispfreq 1000 chempotperstep 0 potentialstyle 'internal' ffnumber 1 ff_filename /home/Bobby/usr/packages/towhee-6.0.4/ForceFields/towhee_ff_TraPPE-UA classical_potential 'Lennard-Jones' classical_mixrule 'Lorentz-Berthelot' lshift ..false. ltailc ..true. rmin 1.0d0 rcut 20.0d0 rcutin 5.0d0 electrostatic_form 'none' nfield 0 solvation_style 'none' linit ..true. initboxtype 'dimensions' initstyle 'full cbmc' initlattice 'simple cubic' initmol 500 inix iniy iniz 8 8 8 hmatrix 270.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 270.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 0.0d0 270.0d0 pm1boxcbswap 0.0d0 pm1cbswmt 1.0d0 pmavb1 1.0d0 pmavb1in 0.5d0 pmavb1mt 1.0d0 pmavb1ct 1.0d0 avb1rad 20.0d0 pmavb2 0.0d0 pmavb2in 0.5d0 pmavb2mt 1.0d0 pmavb2ct 1.0d0 avb2rad 10.0d0 pmavb3 0.0d0 pmavb3mt 1.0d0 pmavb3ct 1.0d0 avb3rad 10.0d0 pmcb 0.0d0 pmcbmt 1.0d0 pmall 0.0d0 pmback 0.0d0 pmbkmt 1.0d0 pmpivot 0.0d0 pmpivmt 1.0d0 pmconrot 0.0d0 pmcrmt 1.0d0 pmcrback 0.0d0 pmcrbmt 1.0d0 pmplane 0.0d0 pmplanebox 1.0d0 planewidth 3.0d0 pmrow 0.0d0 pmrowbox 1.0d0 rowwidth 3.0d0 pmtraat 0.0d0 pmtamt 1.0d0 rmtraa 0.5d0 tatraa 0.5d0 pmtracm 1.0d0 pmtcmt 1.0d0 rmtrac 0.5d0 tatrac 0.5d0 pmrotate 1.0d0 pmromt 1.0d0 rmrot 0.05d0 tarot 0.5d0 cbmc_style 'coupled-decoupled' coupled_decoupled_form 'Martin and Siepmann JPCB 1999' cbmc_setting_style 'default ideal' #trappe-ua methane input_style 'basic connectivity map' nunit 1 nmaxcbmc 1 lpdbnames F forcefield 'TraPPE-UA' charge_assignment 'manual' unit ntype qqatom 1 'CH4' 0.0d0 vibration 0 improper 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: naresh n. <nar...@gm...> - 2008-12-22 09:45:22
|
Dear Towhee users,
I want to run a GCMC simulation by having the adsorbing molecule to
be a rigid molecule.
Is there any way to run a simulation of this sort.
Thanks in advance
Naresh
|
|
From: Marcus M. <mar...@us...> - 2008-12-04 19:35:08
|
Hello Towhee-users, I am once again gutting and rebuilding the internal data structures in Towhee (more on that in a minute), and this leads to a surprising amount of work continuing to try and keep the 'database' inputformat option functional. I implemented that format for my own purposes many years ago, but no longer use it myself. If anyone out there uses this functionality let me know soon as otherwise I am likely to scrap it to save myself the bother of continuing to maintain something of minimal use. The data structure changes are happening because I am replacing the static declared arrays in the data structures with run-time allocation of memory (in C functions that replace the subroutines currently in globaldata.F). Yes, the goal is the elimination of those not-so-lovely #defined array dimensions in preproc.h. The first installment of the new functionality will come with the next release and there will likely be a period of instability in the code until the transition is complete and fully debugged. I appreciate your patience and your prompt and detailed bug reports during the next few releases of Towhee. thanks, Marcus -- Marcus G. Martin Director, Useful Bias Incorporated 88 Martinez Road Edgewood NM 87015-8222 ph. (505) 286-4457 www.usefulbias.com www.photobirder.com |