[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2020056067A1 - Find and validate human lie detectors on the internet to judge presentations of anyone or artificial intelligence - Google Patents

Find and validate human lie detectors on the internet to judge presentations of anyone or artificial intelligence Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2020056067A1
WO2020056067A1 PCT/US2019/050710 US2019050710W WO2020056067A1 WO 2020056067 A1 WO2020056067 A1 WO 2020056067A1 US 2019050710 W US2019050710 W US 2019050710W WO 2020056067 A1 WO2020056067 A1 WO 2020056067A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
lie
human
lies
detectors
lying
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2019/050710
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
David Allen ZORNES
Original Assignee
Zornes David Allen
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Zornes David Allen filed Critical Zornes David Allen
Publication of WO2020056067A1 publication Critical patent/WO2020056067A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09BEDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B5/00Electrically-operated educational appliances

Definitions

  • a lie is a statement used intentionally for deception. The practice of communicating lies is called lying, and a person who communicates a lie may be termed a liar. Lies may be employed to serve a variety of instrumental, interpersonal, or psychological functions for the individuals who use them. Generally, the term "lie” carries a negative connotation, and depending on the context a person who communicates a lie may be subject to social, legal, religious, or criminal sanctions.
  • This invention teaches how to apply the Internet to find unknown people that are good lie detectors when observing media: Videos, books, newspaper articles, and as an observer in an audience watching a LIVE presentation. Producing FALSE intentional lies in Timed Videos provides a time period that a lie occurred, which the human lie detector can categorize the lie and intensity of the lie. [0005] Further, this invention teaches how to apply human lie detectors talents to present to the public a judgment LIE rating of Internet media presentations: Videos, like YouTube, news videos, and lectures or presentations of any kind, which provides the public with a validated human lie detector to judge other people. A categorization of the discovered validated human lie detector is key to public trust of a claim that a person lied.
  • Figure 1 shows diagram of how to find a successful human lie detector, rate the individual, and then apply the skills of a discovered human lie detector.
  • Bullshit does not necessarily have to be a complete fabrication. While a lie is related by a speaker who believes what is said is false, bullshit is offered by a speaker who does not care whether what is said is true because the speaker is more concerned with giving the hearer some impression. Thus, bullshit may be either true or false, but demonstrates a lack of concern for the truth which is likely to lead to falsehoods.
  • a cover-up may be used to deny, defend or obfuscate one's own (or one's allies or group's) errors, one's embarrassing actions or lifestyle, and/or one's lie(s) that they made previously.
  • One may deny a lie made on a previous occasion, or one may alternatively claim that a previous lie was not as egregious as it actually was. For example, to claim that a premeditated lie was really "only” an emergency lie, or to claim that a self-serving lie was really "only” a white lie or noble lie. Not to be confused with confirmation bias in which the deceiver is deceiving themselves.
  • Disinformation is intentionally false or misleading information that is spread in a calculated way to deceive target audiences.
  • Fake news is a type of yellow journalism that consists of deliberate misinformation or hoaxes spread via traditional print and broadcast news media or online social media.
  • a fib is a lie that is considered easy to forgive due to revolving around trivial matters, e.g. a child fibbing that the family dog broke a vase, when the child accidentally broke it.
  • Fraud refers to the act of inducing another person or people to believe a lie to secure material or financial gain for the liar. Depending on the context, fraud may subject the liar to civil or criminal penalties.
  • a half-truth is a deceptive statement that includes some element of truth.
  • the statement might be partly true, the statement may be totally true but only part of the whole truth, or it may employ some deceptive element, such as improper punctuation, or double meaning, especially if the intent is to deceive, evade, blame or misrepresent the truth.
  • Jocose lies are lies meant in jest, intended to be understood as such by all present parties. Teasing and irony are examples. A more elaborate instance is seen in some storytelling traditions, where the storyteller's insistence that the story is the absolute truth, despite all evidence to the contrary (i.e., tall tale), is considered humorous. There is debate about whether these are "real” lies, and different philosophers hold different views.
  • the Crick Crack Club in London arranges a yearly “Grand Lying Contest” with the winner being awarded the wished "Hodja Cup” (named for the Mulla Nasreddin: "The truth is something I have never spoken.”). The winner in 2 was Hugh Lupton. In the United States, the Burlington Liars' Club awards an annual title to the "World Champion Liar.”
  • Lie-to-children is a phrase that describes a simplified explanation of technical or complex subjects as a teaching method for children and laypeople.
  • the phrase has been incorporated by academics within the fields of biology, evolution, bioinformatics and the social sciences. Media use has extended to publications including The Conversation and Forbes.
  • Lying by omission also known as a continuing misrepresentation or quote mining, occurs when an important fact is left out to foster a misconception. Lying by omission includes the failure to correct pre-existing misconceptions. For example, when the seller of a car declares it has been serviced regularly but does not tell that a fault was reported at the last service, the seller lies by omission. It can be compared to dissimulation. An omission is when a person tells most of the truth but leaves out a few key facts that therefore completely change the story.
  • Lying in trade occurs when the seller of a product or service may advertise untrue facts about the product or service to gain sales, especially by competitive advantage. Many countries and states have enacted consumer protection laws intended to combat such fraud. An example is the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act that holds a seller liable for omission of any material fact that the buyer relies upon.
  • a memory hole is a mechanism for the alteration or disappearance of inconvenient or embarrassing documents, photographs, transcripts, or other records, such as from a website or other archive, particularly as part of an attempt to give the impression that something never happened.
  • Minimization is the opposite of exaggeration. It is a type of deception involving denial coupled with rationalization in situations where complete denial is implausible.
  • pathological lying also called compulsive lying, pseudologia fantastica and mythomania
  • compulsive lying pseudologia fantastica and mythomania
  • Perjury is the act of lying or making verifiably false statements on a material matter under oath or affirmation in a court of law, or in any of various sworn statements in writing. Perjury is a crime, because the witness has sworn to tell the truth and, for the credibility of the court to remain intact, witness testimony must be relied on as truthful.
  • a polite lie is a lie that a politeness standard requires, and which is usually known to be untrue by both parties. Whether such lies are acceptable is heavily dependent on culture.
  • a common polite lie in international etiquette is to decline invitations because of "scheduling difficulties”.
  • the butler lie is a small lie which is usually sent electronically and is used to terminate conversations or to save face. For example, sending an SMS to someone reading "I have to go, the waiter is here", when you are not at a restaurant is an example of a butler lie.
  • Puffery is an exaggerated claim typically found in advertising and publicity announcements, such as "the highest quality at the lowest price", or “always votes in the best interest of all the people". Such statements are unlikely to be true - but cannot be proven false and so do not violate trade laws, especially as the consumer is expected to be able to tell that it is not the absolute truth.
  • the native proverb that the "white man spoke with a forked tongue" originated because of the French tactic of the 69s, in their war with the Iroquois, of inviting their enemies to attend a Peace Conference, only to be slaughtered or captured.
  • a weasel word is an informal term for words and phrases aimed at creating an impression that a specific and/or meaningful statement has been made, when in fact only a vague or ambiguous claim has been communicated, enabling the specific meaning to be denied if the statement is challenged.
  • a more formal term is equivocation.
  • White lies are minor lies which could be considered harmless, or even beneficial, in the long term. White lies are also considered to be used for greater good (pro-social behavior). White lies are often used to shield someone from a hurtful or emotionally damaging truth, especially when not knowing the truth is completely harmless. [00041] A black lie is what is simply known as a lie. It is an anti-social behavior where the liar benefits from deceiving and the listener or some other group is hurt.
  • a blue lie is between a white lie and a black lie; as such, it is simultaneously an example of pro-social and anti-social behavior.
  • a blue lie is intended to help your group, thus pro-social; but it does so by damaging others through deceit, thus anti-social.
  • Lying is a perversion of the natural faculty of speech, the natural end of which is to communicate the thoughts of the speaker.
  • the Invention of Lying is a 29 movie depicting the fictitious invention of the first lie, starring Ricky Gervais, Jennifer Garner, Rob Lowe, and Tina Fey. [00073] Psychology
  • a lie detector may categorize (hashtag) the lie under many definitions, examples follow:
  • LTnsorted Betrayal, Double cross, Deception, Propaganda, Spin (public relations), Confabulation, Ethics, Falsifiability, Honesty, Mental reservation,
  • Narcissistic defense sequences Optimism bias, Polite fiction, Prisoner's dilemma, Psychological manipulation, Traitor, Truth, Wizards Project Public observation of statements in: lectures, presentations, news reporting, politics, government, business leadership, law enforcement, military, financial reports, product/service, religious, and any general human statements can be observed by a human lie detector with a rating.
  • Figure 1 shows diagram of how to Start 33 to find a successful human lie detector, rate the individual, and then apply the skills of a discovered human lie detector.
  • Public is distributed in statistical bell curve 666 illustrated in FIG 1, so when testing for lie detectors, some Human Observers of Speakers 34 will be near 100% accurate on left of bell curve and others will be documented as almost completely unable to detect civilization lying on right of bell cure, which this invention teaches the Internet or personal meetings can validate good successful universal human lie detectors. Sorting for successful human lie detectors, presenters can be provided structured presentations with known lies, which are agreed to be lies stated by the presenter to sort people statistically for who can detect lies successfully.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a“personal” observation and grading of the human lie detector can be provided to validate the person is a good lie detector and keep an updated rating on a human lie detectors accuracy.
  • Humans Observed Lies Accurately Near 100% 36 HIGH Rated Successful Human Lie Detector Observers LISTED For Service Anywhere: Internet ID-Validation Method Listed (GPS, Facial Recognition, Time, Place... Fingerprint) 37.
  • FAILED Human Observers 100% did NOT Detect Lies 38 can be prevented from judging as a human lie detector.
  • Some“universal” lie detector people do not need any education on subject matter of a speaker to identify a liar when observing the liar speak.
  • “Academic” human lie detectors can also be rated for any subject matter they are educated in, or have documented reading from Digital Libraries or books, like an Amazon digital-book provider. Purchased books can be read from video displays that also take pictures of the reader to verify they are reading a subject matter indicated, including progress through a book by advancing through book pages on a computer, recording the completion of book. Books can be rated as human lie detector books. Watching digital videos and movies can also include a record of each observation by“academic” human lie detectors.
  • SPEAKERS are ANY Speaker or Group Speaking as
  • Random subject matter not itemized for speaking can be video recorded or marked by trained observers to focus on itemizing a speech after the speech.
  • Educational professionals can declare personal observations too, to sort historical records to determine whether statements are truthful or not?
  • Old videos and movies can be segmented into itemized subject matter, where humans want to know, if the people in the movie are lying.
  • C-span in ETnited States could be marked for important digital statements made in the past with a new human lie detector rating, for example of past issued governing United States now.
  • Figure 2 illustration 20 is a Video Timeline of presentation example where between each Lie Detecting Moments I st , 2 nd , 3 rd , 4 th , 5 th , and 6 th segments is a Lie Detecting moment in the direction arrow of Timeline 19 providing 7-minutes of human speaking, video of speaking, movie of speaking, or a broadcast of speaking on television media: 00.00 hours 10, 00.01 hours 11, 00.02 hours 12, 00.03 hours 13, 00.04 hours 14, 00.05 hours 15, and 00.06 hours 16 ending at 7-minutes.
  • lst Lie Detecting Moment 00.01 :30 hours, 2nd Lie Detecting Moment 00.01 :50 hours, 3rd Lie Detecting Moment 00.03 :20 hours, 4th Lie Detecting Moment 00.03 :40 hours, 5th Lie Detecting Moment 00.04:55 hours, and 6th Lie Detecting Moment 00.06: 10 hours are segmented periods of time that start and stop a human lie detector judgement period of time. To find a human lie detector, or artificial intelligence validation, the source of speakers will provide lies or truthful statements in each time period segment to find random people that can detect liars, or Artificial Intelligence programs that can detect liars.
  • very good lie human or AI lie detectors can classify the type of lie, like all the types of lies defined in this invention.
  • Trademark of products or services can have a rating based on employees telling the truth or lying provided under a BlockChain system in which a record of human or AI lie detectors are maintained across several computers that are linked in a peer-to-peer network "we can actually have a look at the blockchain and see evidence of Truth or Lies about products or services".
  • a blockchain is a digital record of a selected activity. This invention teaches Blockchains are used for recording lie detector judgement made by validated human or AI lie detectors tested with methods described in this invention, and have many other applications in any family, legal, court, political speech, .
  • Each truth or lie added to a blockchain is validated by multiple computers on the Internet validating the lie detectors, human or AI.
  • a block in a blockchain is a collection of data. The data is added to the block in blockchain, by connecting it with other blocks in chronological others creating a chain of blocks linked together.
  • Figure 1 and 2 illustrates how any presentation by anyone can be segmented into any time frame from seconds, minutes, and up to hours and days to validate the truth or find a lie.
  • Intelligence can be added only if the AI is as accurate as humans and provides that humans and AI are rating a liar or not. This invention teaches that a disclosure about whether humans or AI are judging a liar providing the rating.
  • Applications can be downloaded related to discovering new human successful lie detectors or to download a mobile smart-phone software application with scheduled events. Really good human lie detectors could be paid too, or not be paid, which also will be disclosed to observers wanting to witness a liar rating.
  • Figure 1 illustrates Business and Personal Trademarks can be displayed with a rating of how human statements of products or services is true or not?
  • a human lie detector symbol is provided for the industry, examples given: medical, sports, automotive, education, media news outlets, governments, law enforcement, and computer system providers.
  • Sorting for human lie detectors through the Internet can be an initial categorization for a rating of individuals but additional methods can be in person where others can observe that the Internet-Documented human lie detector is the real person or discover new human lie detectors not on the Internet. No resumes or job titles, IQ rating, wealth position, or any other lists of items are relevant to a“natural” human lie detector.
  • Academic human lie detectors can provide their rating for accuracy over time.
  • a high rated trusted human lie detector can be paid by others to observe a live statement or video of a human statement to rate the statement made as a “lie” or absent lies detected, the statement can be rated as“truthful”.
  • Artificial Intelligence can track behavior of a liar by itemizing then programing how a universal human lie detector determines a liar, which provides another rating, an AI rating based on human lie detector success.
  • Biological sensors can be placed on the universal lie detector to document how the successful universal lie detectors behave when detecting human lies.
  • a website on the Internet or Intranet can be provided to sort all human observers to discover universal human lie detectors. Universities, town hall meetings, religious or community meeting can personally sort for human lie detectors. People that legally register for a political office or are serving in a government position, can be individually be listed and then have questions registered on-line in a list, just for that individual. Just questions can be listed for others to answer for a rating of their truthfulness and accuracy because the system has academic observes as an option too. Listing questions that can be answered truthfully and accurately, places the person with successful answers in a leadership position with a high rating from universal human lie detectors, academic observers, and AI ratings.
  • AI Artificial Intelligence
  • machine intelligence is intelligence demonstrated by machines, in contrast to the natural intelligence displayed by humans.
  • artificial intelligence is often used to describe machines (or computers) that mimic “cognitive” functions that humans associate with the human mind, such as “learning” and
  • AI is whatever hasn't been done yet.”
  • Modern machine capabilities generally classified as AI include successfully understanding human speech, competing at the highest level in strategic game systems (such as chess and Go), autonomously operating cars, intelligent routing in content delivery networks, and military simulations.
  • Artificial intelligence can be classified into three different types of systems: analytical, human-inspired, and humanized artificial intelligence.
  • Analytical AI has only characteristics consistent with cognitive intelligence; generating a cognitive representation of the world and using learning based on past experience to inform future decisions.
  • Human-inspired AI has elements from cognitive and emotional intelligence; understanding human emotions, in addition to cognitive elements, and considering them in their decision making.
  • Humanized AI shows characteristics of all types of competencies (i.e., cognitive, emotional, and social intelligence), is able to be self-conscious and is self-aware in interactions.
  • the traditional problems (or goals) of AI research include reasoning, knowledge representation, planning, learning, natural language processing, perception and the ability to move and manipulate objects.
  • General intelligence is among the field's long-term goals.
  • Approaches include statistical methods, computational intelligence, and traditional symbolic AI.
  • Many tools are used in AI, including versions of search and mathematical optimization, artificial neural networks, and methods based on statistics, probability and economics.
  • the AI field draws upon computer science, information engineering, mathematics, psychology, linguistics, philosophy, and many other fields.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

Humans lie at every level of life and in every job, so a human lie detector system is taught to find random people that are good lie detectors applying the Internet. Human lie detectors, validated by testing lie detecting skills can be applied to rate any media news, or any statement by any person or group meeting. Academic human lie detectors can be applied too and rated as an academic lie detector versus a "universal" lie detector discovered under this invention's method of testing for universal human lie detecting.

Description

FIND AND VALIDATE HUMAN LIE DETECTORS ON THE
INTERNET TO JUDGE PRESENTATIONS OF ANYONE OR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN VENTOR(S) : David Allen ZORNES
BACKGROUND
[0001] According to Wikipedia LIE: A lie is a statement used intentionally for deception. The practice of communicating lies is called lying, and a person who communicates a lie may be termed a liar. Lies may be employed to serve a variety of instrumental, interpersonal, or psychological functions for the individuals who use them. Generally, the term "lie" carries a negative connotation, and depending on the context a person who communicates a lie may be subject to social, legal, religious, or criminal sanctions.
[0002] The question of whether lies can reliably be detected through nonverbal means is a subject of some controversy.
[0003] Polygraph "lie detector" machines measure the physiological stress a subject endures in several measures while he/she gives statements or answers questions. Spikes in stress are purported to indicate lying. The accuracy of this method is widely disputed, and in several well-known cases it was proven to have been deceived. Nonetheless, it remains in use in many areas, primarily as a method for eliciting confessions or employment screening. Polygraph results are not admissible as court evidence and are generally perceived to be pseudoscience.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] This invention teaches how to apply the Internet to find unknown people that are good lie detectors when observing media: Videos, books, newspaper articles, and as an observer in an audience watching a LIVE presentation. Producing FALSE intentional lies in Timed Videos provides a time period that a lie occurred, which the human lie detector can categorize the lie and intensity of the lie. [0005] Further, this invention teaches how to apply human lie detectors talents to present to the public a judgment LIE rating of Internet media presentations: Videos, like YouTube, news videos, and lectures or presentations of any kind, which provides the public with a validated human lie detector to judge other people. A categorization of the discovered validated human lie detector is key to public trust of a claim that a person lied.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0006] Figure 1. Figure 1 shows diagram of how to find a successful human lie detector, rate the individual, and then apply the skills of a discovered human lie detector.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND BEST MODE OF IMPLEMENTATION
[0007] The percent of good faith editors, vandals, spammers, and sock puppets from 24-2, out of a random sample of 5-2 new editors per year on Wikipedia [0008] A barefaced (or bald-faced) lie is one that is obviously a lie to those hearing it. "Bold-faced lie" can also refer to misleading or inaccurate newspaper headlines, but this usage appears to be a more recent appropriation of the term.
[0009] A big lie which attempts to trick the victim into believing something major which will likely be contradicted by some information the victim already possesses, or by their common sense. When the lie is of enough magnitude it may succeed, due to the victim's reluctance to believe that an untruth on such a grand scale would indeed be concocted.
[00010] To bluff is to pretend to have a capability or intention one does not actually possess. Bluffing is an act of deception that is rarely seen as immoral when it takes place in the context of a game, such as poker, where this kind of deception is consented to in advance by the players. For instance, a gambler who deceives other players into thinking he has different cards to those he really holds, or an athlete who hints he will move left and then dodges right is not considered to be lying (also known as a feint or juke). In these situations, deception is acceptable and is commonly expected as a tactic.
[00011] Bullshit does not necessarily have to be a complete fabrication. While a lie is related by a speaker who believes what is said is false, bullshit is offered by a speaker who does not care whether what is said is true because the speaker is more concerned with giving the hearer some impression. Thus, bullshit may be either true or false, but demonstrates a lack of concern for the truth which is likely to lead to falsehoods.
[00012] An ostrich only thinks he 'covers up'."
[00013] A cover-up may be used to deny, defend or obfuscate one's own (or one's allies or group's) errors, one's embarrassing actions or lifestyle, and/or one's lie(s) that they made previously. One may deny a lie made on a previous occasion, or one may alternatively claim that a previous lie was not as egregious as it actually was. For example, to claim that a premeditated lie was really "only" an emergency lie, or to claim that a self-serving lie was really "only" a white lie or noble lie. Not to be confused with confirmation bias in which the deceiver is deceiving themselves.
[00014] Defamation is the communication of a false statement that harms the reputation of an individual person, business, product, group, government, religion, or nation. Other various kinds of defamation retaliate against groundless criticism: U.S. Supreme Court declared that the First Amendment protects open and robust debate on public issues even when such debate includes "vehement, caustic, unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." A public official or other plaintiff who has voluntarily assumed a position in the public eye must prove that defamatory statements were made with knowledge that they were false or with reckless disregard of whether they were false, which the public figure law of defamation was first delineated in New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S. Ct. 710, 11 L. Ed. 2d
686 (1964).
[00015] To deflect is to avoid the subject that the lie is about, not giving attention to the lie. When attention is given to the subject the lie is based around, deflectors ignore or refuse to respond. Skillful deflectors are passive-aggressive people, who when confronted with the subject choose to ignore and not respond.
[00016] Disinformation is intentionally false or misleading information that is spread in a calculated way to deceive target audiences.
[00017] An exaggeration occurs when the most fundamental aspects of a statement are true, but only to a certain degree. It is also seen as "stretching the truth" or making something appear more powerful, meaningful, or real than it is. Saying that someone devoured most of something when they only ate half would be considered an exaggeration. An exaggeration might be easily found to be a hyperbole where a person's statement (i.e. in informal speech, such as "He did this like one million times already! ") is meant not to be understood literally.
[00018] Consider the source, check the author, check the date, check the biases, read beyond, supporting sources, is it a joke(?), ask the experts.
[00019] Infographic: How to spot fake news published by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions.
[00020] Fake news is a type of yellow journalism that consists of deliberate misinformation or hoaxes spread via traditional print and broadcast news media or online social media.
[00021] A fib is a lie that is considered easy to forgive due to revolving around trivial matters, e.g. a child fibbing that the family dog broke a vase, when the child accidentally broke it. [00022] Fraud refers to the act of inducing another person or people to believe a lie to secure material or financial gain for the liar. Depending on the context, fraud may subject the liar to civil or criminal penalties.
[00023] A half-truth is a deceptive statement that includes some element of truth. The statement might be partly true, the statement may be totally true but only part of the whole truth, or it may employ some deceptive element, such as improper punctuation, or double meaning, especially if the intent is to deceive, evade, blame or misrepresent the truth.
[00024] An honest lie (or confabulation) can be identified by verbal statements or actions that inaccurately describe history, background, and present situations.
There is generally no intent to misinform and the individual is unaware that their information is false. Because of this, it is not technically a lie at all since, there must be an intent to deceive for the statement to be considered a lie. This invention teaches academic review of human or Artificial Lie detecting is applied to conclude events as lies or NOT lies.
[00025] Jocose lies are lies meant in jest, intended to be understood as such by all present parties. Teasing and irony are examples. A more elaborate instance is seen in some storytelling traditions, where the storyteller's insistence that the story is the absolute truth, despite all evidence to the contrary (i.e., tall tale), is considered humorous. There is debate about whether these are "real" lies, and different philosophers hold different views. The Crick Crack Club in London arranges a yearly "Grand Lying Contest" with the winner being awarded the coveted "Hodja Cup" (named for the Mulla Nasreddin: "The truth is something I have never spoken."). The winner in 2 was Hugh Lupton. In the United States, the Burlington Liars' Club awards an annual title to the "World Champion Liar."
[00026] Lie-to-children is a phrase that describes a simplified explanation of technical or complex subjects as a teaching method for children and laypeople. The phrase has been incorporated by academics within the fields of biology, evolution, bioinformatics and the social sciences. Media use has extended to publications including The Conversation and Forbes.
[00027] Lying by omission, also known as a continuing misrepresentation or quote mining, occurs when an important fact is left out to foster a misconception. Lying by omission includes the failure to correct pre-existing misconceptions. For example, when the seller of a car declares it has been serviced regularly but does not tell that a fault was reported at the last service, the seller lies by omission. It can be compared to dissimulation. An omission is when a person tells most of the truth but leaves out a few key facts that therefore completely change the story.
[00028] Consumer protection laws often mandate the posting of notices, such as this one which appears in all automotive repair shops in California
[00029] Lying in trade occurs when the seller of a product or service may advertise untrue facts about the product or service to gain sales, especially by competitive advantage. Many countries and states have enacted consumer protection laws intended to combat such fraud. An example is the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act that holds a seller liable for omission of any material fact that the buyer relies upon.
[00030] A memory hole is a mechanism for the alteration or disappearance of inconvenient or embarrassing documents, photographs, transcripts, or other records, such as from a website or other archive, particularly as part of an attempt to give the impression that something never happened.
[00031] Minimization is the opposite of exaggeration. It is a type of deception involving denial coupled with rationalization in situations where complete denial is implausible.
[00032] Socrates (depicted in this bust) justified the use of noble lies in Plato's Republic. [00033] A noble lie, which also could be called a strategic untruth, is one that would normally cause discord if uncovered, but offers some benefit to the liar and assists in an orderly society, therefore, potentially beneficial to others. It is often told to maintain law, order and safety.
[00034] In psychiatry, pathological lying (also called compulsive lying, pseudologia fantastica and mythomania) is a behavior of habitual or compulsive lying. It was first described in the medical literature in 89 by Anton Delbrueck. Although it is a controversial topic, pathological lying has been defined as "falsification entirely disproportionate to any discernible end in view, may be extensive and very
complicated, and may manifest over a period of years or even a lifetime". The individual may be aware they are lying, or may believe they are telling the truth, being unaware that they are relating fantasies.
[00035] Perjury is the act of lying or making verifiably false statements on a material matter under oath or affirmation in a court of law, or in any of various sworn statements in writing. Perjury is a crime, because the witness has sworn to tell the truth and, for the credibility of the court to remain intact, witness testimony must be relied on as truthful.
[00036] A polite lie is a lie that a politeness standard requires, and which is usually known to be untrue by both parties. Whether such lies are acceptable is heavily dependent on culture. A common polite lie in international etiquette is to decline invitations because of "scheduling difficulties". Similarly, the butler lie is a small lie which is usually sent electronically and is used to terminate conversations or to save face. For example, sending an SMS to someone reading "I have to go, the waiter is here", when you are not at a restaurant is an example of a butler lie.
[00037] Puffery is an exaggerated claim typically found in advertising and publicity announcements, such as "the highest quality at the lowest price", or "always votes in the best interest of all the people". Such statements are unlikely to be true - but cannot be proven false and so do not violate trade laws, especially as the consumer is expected to be able to tell that it is not the absolute truth.
[00038] The phrase "speaking with a forked tongue" means to deliberately say one thing and mean another or, to be hypocritical, or act in a duplicitous manner. In the longstanding tradition of many Native American tribes, "speaking with a forked tongue" has meant lying, and a person was no longer considered worthy of trust, once he had been shown to "speak with a forked tongue." This phrase was also adopted by Americans around the time of the Revolution, and may be found in abundant references from the early 9th century - often reporting on American officers who sought to convince the tribal leaders with whom they negotiated that they "spoke with a straight and not with a forked tongue" (as for example, President Andrew Jackson told the Creek Nation in 829). According to one 859 account, the native proverb that the "white man spoke with a forked tongue" originated because of the French tactic of the 69s, in their war with the Iroquois, of inviting their enemies to attend a Peace Conference, only to be slaughtered or captured.
[00039] A weasel word is an informal term for words and phrases aimed at creating an impression that a specific and/or meaningful statement has been made, when in fact only a vague or ambiguous claim has been communicated, enabling the specific meaning to be denied if the statement is challenged. A more formal term is equivocation.
[00040] White lies are minor lies which could be considered harmless, or even beneficial, in the long term. White lies are also considered to be used for greater good (pro-social behavior). White lies are often used to shield someone from a hurtful or emotionally damaging truth, especially when not knowing the truth is completely harmless. [00041] A black lie is what is simply known as a lie. It is an anti-social behavior where the liar benefits from deceiving and the listener or some other group is hurt.
[00042] A blue lie is between a white lie and a black lie; as such, it is simultaneously an example of pro-social and anti-social behavior. A blue lie is intended to help your group, thus pro-social; but it does so by damaging others through deceit, thus anti-social.
[00043] Consequences
[00044] Once a lie has been told, there can be two alternative consequences: it may be discovered or remain undiscovered. Under some circumstances, discovery of a lie may discredit other statements by the same speaker and can lead to social or legal sanctions against the speaker, such as ostracizing or conviction for perjury. When a lie is discovered, the state of mind and behavior of the liar is no longer predictable.
[00045] Hannah Arendt spoke about extraordinary cases in which an entire society is being lied to consistently. She said that the consequences of such lying are "not that you believe the lies, but rather that nobody believes anything any longer.
This is because lies, by their very nature, must be changed, and a lying government has constantly to rewrite its own history. On the receiving end you get not only one lie— a lie which you could go on for the rest of your days— but you get a great number of lies, depending on how the political wind blows."
[00046] Detection
[00047] Main article: Lie detection
[00048] The question of whether lies can reliably be detected through nonverbal means is a subject of some controversy.
[00049] Polygraph "lie detector" machines measure the physiological stress a subject endures in several measures while he/she gives statements or answers questions. Spikes in stress are purported to indicate lying. The accuracy of this method is widely disputed, and in several well-known cases it was proven to have been deceived. Nonetheless, it remains in use in many areas, primarily as a method for eliciting confessions or employment screening. Polygraph results are not admissible as court evidence and are generally perceived to be pseudoscience.
[00050] A recent study found that lying takes longer than telling the truth, and thus the time to answer a question may be used as a method of lie detection.
However, it has also been shown that instant answers can be proof of a prepared lie. The only compromise is to try to surprise the victim and find a midway answer, not too quick, nor too long.
[00051] Ethics
[00052] Portrait bust of Aristotle made by Lysippos
[00053] Aristotle believed no general rule on lying was possible, because anybody who advocated lying could never be believed, he said. The philosophers St. Augustine, as well as St. Thomas Aquinas and Immanuel Kant, condemned all lying. However, Thomas Aquinas also had an argument for lying. According to all three, there are no circumstances in which one may ethically lie. Even if the only way to protect oneself is to lie, it is never ethically permissible to lie even in the face of murder, torture, or any other hardship. Each of these philosophers gave several arguments against lying, all compatible with each other. Among the more important arguments are:
[00054] 1. Lying is a perversion of the natural faculty of speech, the natural end of which is to communicate the thoughts of the speaker.
[00055] 2. When one lies, one undermines trust in society.
[00056] Meanwhile, utilitarian philosophers have supported lies which achieve good outcomes - white lies. In his 28 book How to Make Good Decisions and Be Right All the Time, Iain King suggested a credible rule on lying was possible, and defined it as: "Deceive only if you can change behavior in a way worth more than the trust you would lose, were the deception discovered (whether the deception actually is exposed or not)."
[00057] On Lying, neuroscientist Sam Harris argues that lying is negative for the liar and the person who's being lied to. To tell lies is to deny others access to reality. And that often we cannot anticipate how harmful lies can be. The one's we lie to may fail to solve problems they could have solved only on basis of good information. To lie also harms oneself, makes the liar to distrust the person who's been lied to. Liars generally feel bad for it and sense a loss of sincerity, authenticity, integrity. Harris defends that honesty allows you to have deeper relationships, and to bring all dysfunction in one's life to the surface.
[00058] In Human, All Too Human, philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche suggested that those who refrain from lying may do so only because of the difficulty involved in maintaining the lie. This is consistent with his general philosophy that divides (or ranks) people according to strength and ability; thus, some people tell the truth only out of weakness.
[00059] In other species
[00060] The capacity to lie has also been claimed to be possessed by non humans in language studies with great apes. In one instance, gorilla Koko, when asked who tore a sink from the wall, pointed to one of her handlers and then laughed. Deceptive body language, such as feints that mislead as to the intended direction of attack or flight, is observed in many species including wolves [citation needed] A mother bird deceives when it pretends to have a broken wing to divert the attention of a perceived predator - including unwitting humans - from the eggs in its nest to itself, most notably the killdeer.
[00061] In culture
[00062] Close-up of the bronze statue depicting a walking Pinocchio, named Walking to Boras by Jim Dine [00063] Cultural references
[00064] Carlo Collodi's Pinocchio was a wooden puppet often led into trouble by his propensity to lie. His nose grew with every lie; hence, long noses have become a caricature of liars.
[00065] A famous anecdote by Parson Weems claims that George Washington once cut at a cherry tree with a hatchet when he was a small child. His father asked him who cut the cherry tree and Washington confessed his crime with the words: "I'm sorry, father, I cannot tell a lie."
[00066] The Boy Who Cried Wolf, a fable attributed to Aesop about a boy who continually lies a wolf is coming. When a wolf does appear, nobody believes him anymore.
[00067] To Tell the Truth was the originator of a genre of game shows with 3 contestants claiming to be a person only one of them is.
[00068] Glenn Kessler, a journalist at The Washington Post, awards one to four Pinocchios to politicians in his Washington Post Fact Checker blog.
[00069] The cliche "All is fair in love and war" finds justification for lies used to gain advantage in these situations. Sun Tzu declared that "All warfare is based on deception." Machiavelli advised in The Prince "never to attempt to win by force what can be won by deception", and Thomas Hobbes wrote in Leviathan: "In war, force and fraud are the two cardinal virtues."
[00070] Prior Media
[00071] Lie to Me, a TV series based on behavior analysts who read lies through facial expressions and body language. The protagonists, Dr. Cal Lightman and Dr. Gillian Foster are based on the above-mentioned Dr. Paul Ekman and Dr. Maureen O'Sullivan.
[00072] The Invention of Lying is a 29 movie depicting the fictitious invention of the first lie, starring Ricky Gervais, Jennifer Garner, Rob Lowe, and Tina Fey. [00073] Psychology
[00074] The capacity to lie is a talent human being possess universally. The most commonly cited milestone, what is known as Machiavellian intelligence, is at the age of about four and a half years, when children begin to be able to lie convincingly. Before this, they seem simply unable to comprehend why others do not see the same view of events that they do - and seem to assume that there is only one point of view, which is their own. [citation needed]
[00075] The evolutionary theory proposed by Darwin states that only the fittest will survive and by lying, we aim to improve other's perception of our social image and status, capability, and desirability in general. Studies have shown that humans begin lying at a mere age of 6 months, through crying and laughing, to gain attention. Scientific studies have also shown the presence of gender differences in lying.
[00076] Although men and women lie at equal frequencies, men are more likely to lie to please themselves while women are more likely to lie to please others. We are individuals living in a world of competition and strict social norms, where we can use lies and deception to enhance our chances of survival and reproduction. Stereotypically speaking, men like to exaggerate about their sexual expertise but shy away from topics that degrade them while women understate their sexual expertise to make themselves more respectable and loyal in the eyes of men and avoid being labelled as a‘scarlet woman’.
[00077] Those with Parkinson's disease show difficulties in deceiving others, difficulties that link to prefrontal hypometabolism. This suggests a link between the capacity for dishonesty and integrity of prefrontal functioning. Pseudologia fantastica is a term applied by psychiatrists to the behavior of habitual or compulsive lying. Mythomania is the condition where there is an excessive or abnormal propensity for lying and exaggerating. A recent study found that lying takes longer than telling the truth. Or, as Chief Joseph succinctly put it, "It does not require many words to speak the truth."
[00078] Some people believe that they are convincing liars, however in many cases, they are not.
[00079] Augustine's taxonomy
[00080] St. Augustine by Carlo Crivelli
[00081] Augustine of Hippo wrote two books about lying: On Lying (De Mendacio) and Against Lying (Contra Mendacio). He describes each book in his later work, Retractions. Based on the location of De Mendacio in Retractions, it appears to have been written about 395 AD. The first work, On Lying, begins: "Magna quaestio est de Mendacio" ("There is a great question about Lying"). From his text, it can be derived that St. Augustine divided lies into eight categories, listed in order of descending severity:
[00082] Lies in religious teaching
[00083] Lies that harm others and help no one
[00084] Lies that harm others and help someone
[00085] Lies told for the pleasure of lying
[00086] Lies told to "please others in smooth discourse"
[00087] Lies that harm no one and that help someone materially
[00088] Lies that harm no one and that help someone spiritually
[00089] Lies that harm no one and that protect someone from "bodily defilement"
[00090] Despite distinguishing between lies according to their external severity, Augustine maintains in both treatises that all lies, defined precisely as the external communication of what one does not hold to be internally true, are categorically sinful and therefore ethically impermissible. [00091] Augustine wrote that lies told in jest, or by someone who believes or opines the lie to be true are not, in fact, lies.
[00092] A lie detector may categorize (hashtag) the lie under many definitions, examples follow:
[00093] Art" of manipulation by false logic: Sophistry, White Horse Dialogue,
Non-denial denial Non-apology apology, False analogy, False equivalence,
[00094] “Art" of manipulation by psychology: Rhetoric, Appeal to emotion, Scapegoating and favoritism: Victim blaming, Blame shifting, Fall guy, Identified patient, Ingroups and outgroups, Association fallacy, Stereotype, Doublespeak, If-by- whiskey, Loaded language, Glittering generality.
[00095] Art" of manipulation by misrepresentation: Plausible deniability,
Evasion (ethics), Weasel word, No true Scotsman Examples, Post-truth politics, Vacuous truth, Equivocation
[00096] Art" of manipulation by untruths: Alternative facts, False balance,
Disinformation, Black propaganda, Tui (intellectual), Fabrication (science)
[00097] LTnsorted: Betrayal, Double cross, Deception, Propaganda, Spin (public relations), Confabulation, Ethics, Falsifiability, Honesty, Mental reservation,
Narcissistic defense sequences, Optimism bias, Polite fiction, Prisoner's dilemma, Psychological manipulation, Traitor, Truth, Wizards Project Public observation of statements in: lectures, presentations, news reporting, politics, government, business leadership, law enforcement, military, financial reports, product/service, religious, and any general human statements can be observed by a human lie detector with a rating.
[00098] Figure 1 shows diagram of how to Start 33 to find a successful human lie detector, rate the individual, and then apply the skills of a discovered human lie detector. [00099] Public is distributed in statistical bell curve 666 illustrated in FIG 1, so when testing for lie detectors, some Human Observers of Speakers 34 will be near 100% accurate on left of bell curve and others will be documented as almost completely unable to detect humanity lying on right of bell cure, which this invention teaches the Internet or personal meetings can validate good successful universal human lie detectors. Sorting for successful human lie detectors, presenters can be provided structured presentations with known lies, which are agreed to be lies stated by the presenter to sort people statistically for who can detect lies successfully.
[000100] Figure 1 illustrates a“personal” observation and grading of the human lie detector can be provided to validate the person is a good lie detector and keep an updated rating on a human lie detectors accuracy. Humans Observed Lies Accurately Near 100% 36 HIGH Rated Successful Human Lie Detector Observers LISTED For Service Anywhere: Internet ID-Validation Method Listed (GPS, Facial Recognition, Time, Place... Fingerprint) 37. FAILED: Human Observers 100% did NOT Detect Lies 38 can be prevented from judging as a human lie detector. Videos, conferences, and personal presentations can have lies inserted or complete truth to find Savant type people randomly that can detent liars or truthful people, which is a focus of this patent, finding liars and truthful people. HIGH Rated Successful Human Lie Detector RATING Symbol Shows Up On Speakers Videos, Including Itemized Video
Segments or Random Video Segments 39 to improve civilizations activities and decision making.
[000101] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.
[000102] Some“universal” lie detector people do not need any education on subject matter of a speaker to identify a liar when observing the liar speak.
[000103] “Academic” human lie detectors can also be rated for any subject matter they are educated in, or have documented reading from Digital Libraries or books, like an Amazon digital-book provider. Purchased books can be read from video displays that also take pictures of the reader to verify they are reading a subject matter indicated, including progress through a book by advancing through book pages on a computer, recording the completion of book. Books can be rated as human lie detector books. Watching digital videos and movies can also include a record of each observation by“academic” human lie detectors.
[000104] In Figure 1 Structured presentations with specific itemized subject matter can be placed in limited time periods or videos (or managed by live
presentation directors): SPEAKERS are ANY Speaker or Group Speaking as
Politicians, Government employees, Chief Executive Officers (CEOs), Chief
Financial Officers (CFOs), News reporters, etc. 35, no limits as to title of speaker. In addition, unlimited time can be provided for each item of subject matter.
[000105] In Figure 1 Random subject matter not itemized for speaking can be video recorded or marked by trained observers to focus on itemizing a speech after the speech. Educational professionals can declare personal observations too, to sort historical records to determine whether statements are truthful or not? Old videos and movies can be segmented into itemized subject matter, where humans want to know, if the people in the movie are lying. C-span in ETnited States could be marked for important digital statements made in the past with a new human lie detector rating, for example of past issued governing United States now.
[000106] Figure 2 illustration 20 is a Video Timeline of presentation example where between each Lie Detecting Moments Ist, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th segments is a Lie Detecting moment in the direction arrow of Timeline 19 providing 7-minutes of human speaking, video of speaking, movie of speaking, or a broadcast of speaking on television media: 00.00 hours 10, 00.01 hours 11, 00.02 hours 12, 00.03 hours 13, 00.04 hours 14, 00.05 hours 15, and 00.06 hours 16 ending at 7-minutes. lst Lie Detecting Moment 00.01 :30 hours, 2nd Lie Detecting Moment 00.01 :50 hours, 3rd Lie Detecting Moment 00.03 :20 hours, 4th Lie Detecting Moment 00.03 :40 hours, 5th Lie Detecting Moment 00.04:55 hours, and 6th Lie Detecting Moment 00.06: 10 hours are segmented periods of time that start and stop a human lie detector judgement period of time. To find a human lie detector, or artificial intelligence validation, the source of speakers will provide lies or truthful statements in each time period segment to find random people that can detect liars, or Artificial Intelligence programs that can detect liars. In addition, very good lie human or AI lie detectors can classify the type of lie, like all the types of lies defined in this invention. Trademark of products or services can have a rating based on employees telling the truth or lying provided under a BlockChain system in which a record of human or AI lie detectors are maintained across several computers that are linked in a peer-to-peer network "we can actually have a look at the blockchain and see evidence of Truth or Lies about products or services". A blockchain is a digital record of a selected activity. This invention teaches Blockchains are used for recording lie detector judgement made by validated human or AI lie detectors tested with methods described in this invention, and have many other applications in any family, legal, court, political speech, . Each truth or lie added to a blockchain is validated by multiple computers on the Internet validating the lie detectors, human or AI. A block in a blockchain is a collection of data. The data is added to the block in blockchain, by connecting it with other blocks in chronological others creating a chain of blocks linked together. Add-Only: Data can only be added in the blockchain with time-sequential order that this invention provides a method for finding valid human or AI lie detectors applied to judge any statement or representation. Figure 1 and 2 illustrates how any presentation by anyone can be segmented into any time frame from seconds, minutes, and up to hours and days to validate the truth or find a lie. People can believe they are lying, but be speaking the truth, so this invention teaches Academic people, including digital surveillance of their evaluation and judgements can be added to rating by Savant Human Lie Detectors randomly found by providing Internet videos of manmade lies and manmade truth validating human or AI lie detectors. Each block of lie detector judges are visible to every member of the network, ensuring trust between parties. Because a blockchain has no borders, it allows for secure collaboration between parties sharing any kind of human presentation. As a result of these traits, the blockchain has limitless potential in all kinds of applications to find liars and truthful speakers.
[000107] Witnesses in legal courts. Police reports, and news releases can be observed by validated lie detectors, humans and/or Artificial Intelligence (AI).
[000108] YouTube, LinkedIN, Visio, C-Span. and other Internet source videos can be documented with lies, so all observers can watch the video, then rated segments divided for judgment, which focuses on finding“universal” human lie detectors and academic human lie detectors. An attempt to apply Artificial
Intelligence can be added only if the AI is as accurate as humans and provides that humans and AI are rating a liar or not. This invention teaches that a disclosure about whether humans or AI are judging a liar providing the rating.
[000109] Applications can be downloaded related to discovering new human successful lie detectors or to download a mobile smart-phone software application with scheduled events. Really good human lie detectors could be paid too, or not be paid, which also will be disclosed to observers wanting to witness a liar rating.
[000110] In Figure 1 illustrates Business and Personal Trademarks can be displayed with a rating of how human statements of products or services is true or not? In these cases, a human lie detector symbol is provided for the industry, examples given: medical, sports, automotive, education, media news outlets, governments, law enforcement, and computer system providers.
[000111] Sorting for human lie detectors through the Internet can be an initial categorization for a rating of individuals but additional methods can be in person where others can observe that the Internet-Documented human lie detector is the real person or discover new human lie detectors not on the Internet. No resumes or job titles, IQ rating, wealth position, or any other lists of items are relevant to a“natural” human lie detector.
[000112] Academic human lie detectors can provide their rating for accuracy over time.
[000113] A high rated trusted human lie detector can be paid by others to observe a live statement or video of a human statement to rate the statement made as a “lie” or absent lies detected, the statement can be rated as“truthful”.
[000114] Two ratings dominate the human lie detector system, an individual that detects almost all lies without an academic background and categorized academic lie detectors with library resources to validate a person is a liar.
[000115] Artificial Intelligence can track behavior of a liar by itemizing then programing how a universal human lie detector determines a liar, which provides another rating, an AI rating based on human lie detector success. Biological sensors can be placed on the universal lie detector to document how the successful universal lie detectors behave when detecting human lies.
[000116] In Figure 1 and 2 a website on the Internet or Intranet can be provided to sort all human observers to discover universal human lie detectors. Universities, town hall meetings, religious or community meeting can personally sort for human lie detectors. People that legally register for a political office or are serving in a government position, can be individually be listed and then have questions registered on-line in a list, just for that individual. Just questions can be listed for others to answer for a rating of their truthfulness and accuracy because the system has academic observes as an option too. Listing questions that can be answered truthfully and accurately, places the person with successful answers in a leadership position with a high rating from universal human lie detectors, academic observers, and AI ratings. [000117] In computer science, Artificial Intelligence (AI), sometimes called machine intelligence, is intelligence demonstrated by machines, in contrast to the natural intelligence displayed by humans. Colloquially, the term "artificial intelligence" is often used to describe machines (or computers) that mimic "cognitive" functions that humans associate with the human mind, such as "learning" and
"problem solving".
[000118] As machines become increasingly capable, tasks considered to require "intelligence" are often removed from the definition of AI, a phenomenon known as the AI effect. A quip in Tesler's Theorem says "AI is whatever hasn't been done yet." For instance, optical character recognition is frequently excluded from things considered to be AI, having become a routine technology. Modern machine capabilities generally classified as AI include successfully understanding human speech, competing at the highest level in strategic game systems (such as chess and Go), autonomously operating cars, intelligent routing in content delivery networks, and military simulations.
[000119] Artificial intelligence can be classified into three different types of systems: analytical, human-inspired, and humanized artificial intelligence. Analytical AI has only characteristics consistent with cognitive intelligence; generating a cognitive representation of the world and using learning based on past experience to inform future decisions. Human-inspired AI has elements from cognitive and emotional intelligence; understanding human emotions, in addition to cognitive elements, and considering them in their decision making. Humanized AI shows characteristics of all types of competencies (i.e., cognitive, emotional, and social intelligence), is able to be self-conscious and is self-aware in interactions.
[000120] The traditional problems (or goals) of AI research include reasoning, knowledge representation, planning, learning, natural language processing, perception and the ability to move and manipulate objects. General intelligence is among the field's long-term goals. Approaches include statistical methods, computational intelligence, and traditional symbolic AI. Many tools are used in AI, including versions of search and mathematical optimization, artificial neural networks, and methods based on statistics, probability and economics. The AI field draws upon computer science, information engineering, mathematics, psychology, linguistics, philosophy, and many other fields.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. A method for providing human lies in videos or personal presentations by speakers to discover human lie detectors comprises: a known lie is provided to a speaker that the speaker knows is a lie; and
a speaker personally makes the statement that the speaker knows is a lie, and a feedback sheet, a set of buttons with electric sensors, or a smart-phone application is provided to an audience populated with people to observe the speaker(s) to sort which observer is a good human lie detector (a video or movie film recording is made for replay to find other observers that could not personally attend the presentation).
PCT/US2019/050710 2018-09-11 2019-09-11 Find and validate human lie detectors on the internet to judge presentations of anyone or artificial intelligence WO2020056067A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201862729993P 2018-09-11 2018-09-11
US62/729,993 2018-09-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2020056067A1 true WO2020056067A1 (en) 2020-03-19

Family

ID=69777826

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2019/050710 WO2020056067A1 (en) 2018-09-11 2019-09-11 Find and validate human lie detectors on the internet to judge presentations of anyone or artificial intelligence

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2020056067A1 (en)

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160045829A1 (en) * 2011-06-10 2016-02-18 Lucas J. Myslinski Fantasy game play fact checking

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160045829A1 (en) * 2011-06-10 2016-02-18 Lucas J. Myslinski Fantasy game play fact checking

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GRANIK ET AL.: "Fake News Detection Using Naive Bayes Classifier", 2017 IEEE FIRST UKRAINE CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (UKRCON, 2017, XP033251106, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8100379> [retrieved on 20200113] *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Hammersley What is qualitative research?
Aroian Discrimination against muslim american adolescents
Dalziel et al. Rumor and communication in Asia in the Internet age
Beutel et al. How do fake news and hate speech affect political discussion and target persons and how can they be detected?
Sandberg et al. Different contexts–different stories: Adolescents' experiences of how ethnicity is addressed in schools and sports and on social media in Sweden
Hussain Exploring people’s perceptions of precursors to the development of radicalisation and extremism.
Maruf Forced marriage: A study on British Bangladeshi community
Hughes Trump's Twiplomacy-A New Diplomatic Norm?
WO2020056067A1 (en) Find and validate human lie detectors on the internet to judge presentations of anyone or artificial intelligence
Brandau Adolescent Victims' Experiences with Cyberbullying: A Grounded Theory Study
Murbach Self-efficacy in information security: a mixed methods study of deaf end-users
Martinez Jr The Unattached Gang-Affiliated Relationship as Mediated Through Social Media & Real-Life Experiences
Aziz Religious identity and sense of belonging among Rowan University muslim students
McDaniel Jr Metropolitan Young Adult American Muslims Perceptions of Discrimination Post American Patriot Act
Fleet Becoming a queer teacher: Perceptions of queer teacher candidates in initial teacher education programs
Knapton From Exclusion to Extremism: The Role of Significance Loss and Identity in the Radicalization Process
Goldsmith Whistleblowing Intention in Sport: Perceptions, Antecedent Conditions, and Cost-Benefit Analysis
Chaudhry Ten years later: Exploring the lived experiences of college-aged Muslim American women after September 11th
Nicolas Beyond Sport: Black Student Athletes Experiences with Race and Anti Racist Practices
Mullen Impression Management Strategies Used by Evangelical Organizations in the Wake of an Image-Threatening Event
Prete et al. Age‐related differences when measuring political hypocrisy
Herring Cyberbullying Victimization: The Lived Experiences of Parents
Al Balushi The role of dramaturgy in change management in Shell Oman Marketing Company
Marutzky Accountability of Toxic Leaders by Followers: A Phenomenological Understanding of Direct Reporter’s Experience of Toxic Leadership in Christian Churches
Modir Exploring the Middle Eastern American Students' College Experience: Adjustment, Discrimination, and Coping

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 19859506

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WPC Withdrawal of priority claims after completion of the technical preparations for international publication

Ref document number: 62/729,993

Country of ref document: US

Date of ref document: 20210310

Free format text: WITHDRAWN AFTER TECHNICAL PREPARATION FINISHED

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 19859506

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1