WO2018120721A1 - Method and system for testing user interface, electronic device, and computer readable storage medium - Google Patents

Abstract

A method for testing a user interface, the method comprising: receiving a preset type of log information sent by a user terminal within a preset period of time and corresponding to a user interface displayed on the user terminal, the preset type of log information being preset type of log information of an operation behavior detected and recorded when the user terminal responds to the operation behavior of a user on the user interface displayed on the user terminal (S10); parsing the received preset type of log information to obtain operation control information and operation type information comprised in each preset type of log information (S20); classifying the parsed operation control information and/or operation type information according to a predetermined classification rule to determine each control to be tested and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested (S30); and determining a testing code corresponding to each control to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relation among controls to be tested, operation types, and testing codes, and generating a testing script based on the testing code corresponding to each control to be tested so as to test the user interface displayed on the user terminal by using the generated testing script (S40). The method does not need a developer to manually write a testing script, thereby achieving high efficiency with a low error rate.

Description

User interface test method, system, electronic device and computer readable storage medium

Priority claim

The present application is based on the priority of the Paris Convention, the priority of the Chinese Patent Application No. CN2016112657437, entitled "Test Method and Server for User Interface", which is filed on Dec. 30, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference. In this application.

Technical field

The present invention relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to a user interface testing method, system, electronic device, and computer readable storage medium.

Background technique

At present, the user interface developer's automated test for the user interface (UI) is usually pre-written test scripts and test information collection and analysis through the control identification, the tester's experience and professional skills are high. Programming is inefficient and error-prone. In addition, version iterations of the user interface are usually faster, resulting in high maintenance costs for test scripts.

Summary of the invention

The main object of the present invention is to provide a test method, system, electronic device and computer readable storage medium for a user interface, which aims to improve the efficiency of generating a test script of a user interface.

To achieve the above object, a first aspect of the present invention provides a method for testing a user interface, the method comprising the following steps:

And receiving, by the user terminal, the preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal, where the preset type log information is the user that the user terminal displays in response to the user for the user terminal. The preset type log information of the operation behavior is detected and recorded during the operation behavior of the interface, and the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information;

Parsing the received preset type log information to parse the operation control information and the operation type information included in the log information of each preset type;

The parsed operation control information and/or the operation type information are classified according to a predetermined classification rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested;

Determining a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generating a test script based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, to use the generated test script to The user interface displayed on the user terminal is tested.

A second aspect of the present invention provides a test system for a user interface, the test system comprising:

The receiving module is configured to receive preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal, and the preset type log information is that the user terminal responds to the user for the user Detect and record the operation behavior of the user interface displayed on the terminal Preset type log information of the operation behavior, the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information;

The parsing module is configured to parse the received preset type log information to parse operation control information and operation type information included in each preset type log information;

a categorization module, configured to classify the parsed operation control information and/or operation type information according to a predetermined categorization rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested;

a generating module, configured to determine a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generate a test script based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, to generate a test script The test script tests the user interface displayed on the user terminal.

A third aspect of the present application provides an electronic device, including a processing device, a storage device, and a user interface test system, where the test system of the user interface is stored in the storage device, including at least one computer readable instruction, the at least one computer A read command can be executed by the processing device to:

And receiving, by the user terminal, the preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal, where the preset type log information is the user that the user terminal displays in response to the user for the user terminal. The preset type log information of the operation behavior is detected and recorded during the operation behavior of the interface, and the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information;

Parsing the received preset type log information to parse the operation control information and the operation type information included in the log information of each preset type;

The parsed operation control information and/or the operation type information are classified according to a predetermined classification rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested;

Determining a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generating a test script based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, to use the generated test script to The user interface displayed on the user terminal is tested.

A fourth aspect of the present application provides a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon at least one computer readable instruction executable by a processing device to:

And receiving, by the user terminal, the preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal, where the preset type log information is the user that the user terminal displays in response to the user for the user terminal. The preset type log information of the operation behavior is detected and recorded during the operation behavior of the interface, and the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information;

Parsing the received preset type log information to parse the operation control information and the operation type information included in the log information of each preset type;

The parsed operation control information and/or the operation type information are classified according to a predetermined classification rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested;

Determining a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generating a test script based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, to use the generated test script to The user interface displayed on the user terminal is tested.

The user interface testing method, system, electronic device and computer readable storage medium provided by the present invention perform the preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal sent by the user terminal within a preset time period. Parsing, obtaining operation control information and operation type information corresponding to each preset type log information; and determining each control to be tested and corresponding operation type; determining each according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control, the operation type, and the test code The test code corresponding to the test to be tested, and the test script is generated based on the test code corresponding to each test to be tested for user interface test. The test code corresponding to the control to be tested is obtained according to the log information generated by the operation behavior of the user on the user interface, and the test code corresponding to the control to be tested is obtained according to the operation control information and the operation type information corresponding to the operation behavior of the user. The test code corresponding to each test to be tested generates a test script without requiring the developer to manually write the test script, which is more efficient and less error-prone, and only needs to re-acquire each iteration after the iteration of the subsequent user interface version. The test code corresponding to the control can automatically generate test scripts, and the maintenance cost is low.

DRAWINGS

1 is a schematic diagram of an application environment of a preferred embodiment of a test method for a user interface according to the present invention;

2 is a schematic flowchart of a first embodiment of a test method for a user interface according to the present invention;

3 is a schematic flowchart of a second embodiment of a test method for a user interface according to the present invention;

4 is a schematic diagram of functional modules of a first embodiment of a test system for a user interface according to the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of functional modules of a second embodiment of a test system for a user interface according to the present invention.

The implementation, functional features, and advantages of the present invention will be further described in conjunction with the embodiments.

detailed description

The present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments, in order to make the present invention. It is understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.

Referring to FIG. 1 , it is a schematic diagram of an application environment of a preferred embodiment of a method for implementing a user interface according to the present invention. The application environment diagram includes an electronic device 1 and a terminal device 2. The electronic device 1 can perform data interaction with the terminal device 2 through a suitable technology such as a network or a near field communication technology.

The terminal device 2 includes, but is not limited to, any electronic product that can interact with a user through a keyboard, a mouse, a remote controller, a touch pad, or a voice control device, for example, a personal computer, a tablet computer, a smart phone, or an individual. Digital Assistant (PDA), game console, Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), smart wearable Equipment, etc. The network in which the user equipment and the network device are located includes, but is not limited to, the Internet, a wide area network, a metropolitan area network, a local area network, a virtual private network (VPN), and the like.

The electronic device 1 is an apparatus capable of automatically performing numerical calculation and/or information processing in accordance with an instruction set or stored in advance. The electronic device 1 may be a computer, a single network server, a server group composed of multiple network servers, or a cloud-based cloud composed of a large number of hosts or network servers, where cloud computing is a type of distributed computing, A super virtual computer consisting of a loosely coupled set of computers.

In the present embodiment, the electronic device 1 includes, but is not limited to, a storage device 11, a processing device 12, and a network interface 13 that are communicably connected to each other through a system bus. It should be noted that FIG. 1 only shows the electronic device 1 having the components 11-13, but it should be understood that not all illustrated components are required to be implemented, and more or fewer components may be implemented instead.

The storage device 11 includes a memory and at least one type of readable storage medium. The memory provides a cache for the operation of the electronic device 1; the readable storage medium may be a non-volatile storage medium such as a flash memory, a hard disk, a multimedia card, a card type memory, or the like. In some embodiments, the readable storage medium may be an internal storage unit of the electronic device 1, such as a hard disk of the electronic device 1; in other embodiments, the non-volatile storage medium may also be external to the electronic device 1. A storage device, such as a plug-in hard disk equipped with an electronic device 1, a smart memory card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) card, a flash card, or the like. In this embodiment, the readable storage medium of the storage device 11 is generally used to store an operating system installed in the electronic device 1 and various types of application software, such as program code of the test system 10 of the user interface in an embodiment of the present application. Further, the storage device 11 can also be used to temporarily store various types of data that have been output or are to be output.

Processing device 12 may, in some embodiments, include one or more microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital processors, and the like. The processing device 12 is generally used to control the operation of the electronic device 1, for example, to perform control and processing related to data interaction or communication with the terminal device 2. In the present embodiment, the processing device 12 is configured to run program code or process data stored in the storage device 11, such as the test system 10 running a user interface, and the like.

The network interface 13 may comprise a wireless network interface or a wired network interface, which is typically used to establish a communication connection between the electronic device 1 and other electronic devices. In this embodiment, the network interface 13 is mainly used to connect the electronic device 1 with one or more terminal devices 2, and establish a data transmission channel and a communication connection between the electronic device 1 and one or more terminal devices 2.

The test system 10 of the user interface includes at least one computer readable instructions stored in the storage device 11, the at least one computer readable instructions being executable by the processing device 12 to implement a test method for a user interface of various embodiments of the present application. As described later, the at least one computer readable instruction can be classified into different logic modules depending on the functions implemented by its various parts.

In an embodiment, when the testing system 10 of the user interface is executed by the processing device 12, the following operations are performed: receiving the preset type date information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal sent by the terminal device 2 within a preset time Parsing the received preset type log information to parse out the operation control information and operation type information included in each preset type log information; according to the predetermined return of the parsed operation control information and/or operation type information Class rules are categorized to Determining the respective control types to be tested, and the operation types corresponding to the respective to-be-tested controls; determining the test codes corresponding to the respective control to be tested according to the predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, the operation type and the test code, and based on each test to be tested The test code corresponding to the control generates a test script to test the user interface displayed on the user terminal by using the generated test script.

The invention provides a test method for a user interface.

Referring to FIG. 2, FIG. 2 is a schematic flowchart diagram of a first embodiment of a test method for a user interface according to the present invention.

In the first embodiment, the test method of the user interface includes:

In step S10, the preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal sent by the user terminal is received in the preset time, and the preset type log information is that the user terminal is responding to the user for the user terminal. The preset type log information of the operation behavior that is detected and recorded during the operation behavior of the displayed user interface, and the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information;

In this embodiment, on the user terminal (terminal device 2) where the user interface that needs to be tested is determined, the user terminal monitors the operation behavior of the user for the user interface in real time or periodically, and if the user is monitored, An operation behavior of the user interface is responded, and the user terminal detects and records the preset type log information corresponding to the operation behavior, where the preset type log information includes operation control information (eg, operation control name, identifier, etc.) And operation type information including, but not limited to, a click operation, a slide operation, a scroll operation, a drag operation, a press operation, and the like.

In an implementation manner, the user terminal may retrieve system log information when monitoring the user's operation behavior for the user interface, and extract operation control information and operation type corresponding to the operation behavior from the system log information. information. In another implementation manner, the user terminal is pre-configured with a log information collection module, and the log information collection module detects and records the operation control information corresponding to each user operation behavior of the user interface in real time or periodically. And operation type information.

The preset type log information sent by the user terminal is received within a preset time (for example, within the last 30 days) to obtain operation control information and operation type information corresponding to the operation behavior of the user for the user interface.

In step S20, the received preset type log information is parsed to parse out the operation control information and the operation type information included in the log information of each preset type;

Step S30, classifying the parsed operation control information and/or operation type information according to a predetermined classification rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested;

The parsing of the received preset type log information is performed, and the operation control information and the operation type information recorded in the log information of each preset type are parsed. For each time in the preset time, the operation control information and the operation type information corresponding to the operation behavior of the user interface are classified, for example, the operation control information may be classified into the same class according to the operation control information, and The operations type information may be classified into the same class according to the operation type information, and may also be the same test code according to a predetermined correspondence between the same test code and various operation control information or operation type information. The corresponding operation controls of various operation control information or operation type information are classified into the same class, and the like. The operation control of the same class is classified as a control to be tested, and each control to be tested in the received preset type log information, and the operation type corresponding to each control to be tested are determined.

Step S40: Determine a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generate a test script based on the test code corresponding to each test to be tested, so as to utilize the generated test. The script tests the user interface displayed on the user terminal.

After determining the to-be-tested control and the corresponding operation type in the received preset type log information, the test code corresponding to each test to be tested may be determined according to a predetermined mapping relationship between different controls, operation types, and test codes. . Since the test code corresponding to the same control and its corresponding operation type is fixed, the mapping relationship between different controls, operation types and test codes can be determined in advance, and the control to be tested and its corresponding operation are determined. After the type, the modular test code corresponding to the control to be tested and its corresponding operation type can be obtained according to the predetermined mapping relationship. After determining the test code corresponding to each test to be tested, the test code corresponding to each test to be tested can be spliced, combined, and the like to generate a final test script to display the user terminal by using the generated test script. The user interface performs tests for various types of operations.

In this embodiment, the preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal sent by the user terminal is parsed, and the operation control information and the operation type information corresponding to the log information of each preset type are obtained. And determining each control to be tested and the corresponding operation type; determining the test code corresponding to each control to be tested according to the predetermined mapping relationship between the control, the operation type and the test code, and based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested Generate test scripts for user interface testing. The test code corresponding to the control to be tested is obtained according to the log information generated by the operation behavior of the user on the user interface, and the test code corresponding to the control to be tested is obtained according to the operation control information and the operation type information corresponding to the operation behavior of the user. The test code corresponding to each test to be tested generates a test script without requiring the developer to manually write the test script, which is more efficient and less error-prone, and only needs to re-acquire each iteration after the iteration of the subsequent user interface version. The test code corresponding to the control can automatically generate test scripts, and the maintenance cost is low.

Further, in other embodiments, the predetermined categorization rules include:

The operation type information corresponding to the parsed operation control information is classified, so that the operation type information corresponding to the same operation control information is classified into the same attribute class, and the operation type information corresponding to different operation control information is classified into different attributes. class;

The operation control corresponding to each attribute class is used as a control to be tested, and all operation types under each attribute class are used as corresponding operation types of the control to be tested corresponding to the attribute class.

In the embodiment, when the parsed operation control information and the operation type information are classified, the operation control information is used as a classification, for example, when the operation control information is the operation control name, the same control name and The corresponding operation type information is classified into the same attribute class, and different control names and their corresponding operation type information are classified into different attribute classes. The operation control corresponding to the same control name As the control to be tested, and all the operation types under the same control name as the corresponding operation type of the control to be tested. Because the test code corresponding to the operation control corresponding to the same control name is the same or similar, the same control name and its corresponding operation type information are classified into the same attribute class, and the operation control with the same or similar test code can be returned. For a class, after determining the test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to the mapping relationship between the predetermined control, the operation type and the test code, it is only necessary to find the test corresponding to each operation type according to different operation types of the same type of operation control. The code does not need to search for the operation controls of each of the same or different operation control information, which simplifies the search process and determines that the test code corresponding to each control to be tested is more efficient.

Further, in other embodiments, the predetermined classification rule further includes:

Analyze whether the operation control corresponding to each attribute class is included in the preset control list to be tested, and if so, the operation control corresponding to the attribute class is used as the control to be tested.

In this embodiment, after the operation type information corresponding to the same operation control information is classified into the same attribute class, and the operation type information corresponding to the different operation control information is classified into different attribute classes, the operation corresponding to each attribute class is also performed. The control performs filtering, for example, whether the operation control corresponding to each attribute class is included in the preset control list to be tested, and if so, the operation control corresponding to the attribute class is used as the control to be tested. In this way, the user can set a list of the control to be tested according to the test needs in the actual application. For example, according to the focus of each test, the list of the control to be tested in the list of the control to be tested can be added or deleted, and the subsequent control can be controlled. The control to be tested corresponding to the determined test code is the control to be tested required for the test, and the custom acquisition of the test code is realized, and the required test script can be generated more flexibly, and the utility is higher.

As shown in FIG. 3, a second embodiment of the present invention provides a test method for a user interface. On the basis of the foregoing embodiment, after the step S30, the method further includes:

Step S50: Determine, according to the configuration file of the user interface, all configuration controls corresponding to the user interface;

Step S60, comparing the determined control to be tested with each configuration control to filter out configuration controls of all the configuration controls that are not to be tested;

In step S70, a reminder message is generated to remind the user to add a test code to the selected configuration control, and/or to remind the necessary check for the selected configuration control.

In this embodiment, after the parsed operation control information and the operation type information are classified according to a predetermined classification rule and the respective to-be-tested controls are determined, further, according to the configuration file of the user interface, The user interface corresponds to all the configuration controls, and compares the determined control to be tested with each configuration control to filter out the configuration controls of all the configuration controls that are not to be tested. Since each control to be tested is determined based on the user's operational behavior for the user interface, the user's operational behavior for the user interface may not involve all the controls on the user interface. Therefore, to comprehensively test the user interface, compare the determined control to be tested with all the configuration controls corresponding to the user interface, and filter out the configuration controls of all the configuration controls that are not to be tested, and filter out The configuration control is the control on the user interface that is not involved in the user's operation behavior for the user interface. Generating reminder information, such as sending reminder information to a predetermined terminal, to remind the user to add a test generation to the filtered configuration control Code, and/or, reminder to check the necessary configuration controls, add test code to the configuration control that is necessary to test, and combine the added test code with the test code corresponding to each control to be tested to form the final complete Test scripts to test the user interface more comprehensively.

The invention further provides a test system for a user interface.

Referring to FIG. 4, FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of functional modules of a first embodiment of a test system for a user interface according to the present invention.

In a first embodiment, the test system of the user interface comprises:

The receiving module 01 is configured to receive preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal, and the preset type log information is that the user terminal responds to the user The preset type log information of the operation behavior is detected and recorded when the operation behavior of the user interface is displayed on the user terminal, and the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information;

In this embodiment, on the user terminal where the predetermined user interface that needs to be tested is located, the user terminal monitors the operation behavior of the user for the user interface in real time or periodically, and if the user is monitored for the user interface, When the operation behavior is responded, the user terminal detects and records the preset type log information corresponding to the operation behavior, and the preset type log information includes operation control information (eg, operation control name, identifier, etc.) and operation type information. The operation type information includes, but is not limited to, a click operation, a slide operation, a scroll operation, a drag operation, a press operation, and the like.

In an implementation manner, the user terminal may retrieve system log information when monitoring the user's operation behavior for the user interface, and extract operation control information and operation type corresponding to the operation behavior from the system log information. information. In another implementation manner, the user terminal is pre-configured with a log information collection module, and the log information collection module detects and records the operation control information corresponding to each user operation behavior of the user interface in real time or periodically. And operation type information.

The test system receives the preset type log information sent by the user terminal within a preset time (for example, the last 30 days) to obtain the operation control information and the operation type information corresponding to the operation behavior of the user for the user interface.

The parsing module 02 is configured to parse the received preset type log information to parse the operation control information and the operation type information included in the log information of each preset type;

The categorization module 03 is configured to classify the parsed operation control information and/or operation type information according to a predetermined categorization rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested;

The test system parses the received preset type log information, and parses out operation control information and operation type information recorded in each preset type log information. For each time in the preset time, the operation control information and the operation type information corresponding to the operation behavior of the user interface are classified, for example, the operation control information may be classified into the same class according to the operation control information, and The operation type information may be classified into the same class according to the operation type information, or may be the same as the corresponding correspondence between the same test code and various operation control information or operation type information. The operation controls corresponding to various operation control information or operation type information corresponding to the test code are classified into the same class, and the like. The operation control of the same class is classified as a control to be tested, and each control to be tested in the received preset type log information, and the operation type corresponding to each control to be tested are determined.

The generating module 04 is configured to determine a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generate a test script based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, to utilize The generated test script tests the user interface displayed on the user terminal.

After determining the to-be-tested control and the corresponding operation type in the received preset type log information, the test code corresponding to each test to be tested may be determined according to a predetermined mapping relationship between different controls, operation types, and test codes. . Since the test code corresponding to the same control and its corresponding operation type is fixed, the mapping relationship between different controls, operation types and test codes can be determined in advance, and the control to be tested and its corresponding operation are determined. After the type, the modular test code corresponding to the control to be tested and its corresponding operation type can be obtained according to the predetermined mapping relationship. After determining the test code corresponding to each test to be tested, the test code corresponding to each test to be tested can be spliced, combined, and the like to generate a final test script to display the user terminal by using the generated test script. The user interface performs tests for various types of operations.

In this embodiment, the test system parses the preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal, which is sent by the user terminal in the preset time, and obtains the operation control information and operation corresponding to the log information of each preset type. Type information; and determine each control to be tested and the corresponding operation type; according to the predetermined mapping relationship between the control, the operation type and the test code, determine the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, and based on the corresponding control to be tested The test code generates test scripts for user interface testing. The test code corresponding to the control to be tested is obtained according to the log information generated by the operation behavior of the user on the user interface, and the test code corresponding to the control to be tested is obtained according to the operation control information and the operation type information corresponding to the operation behavior of the user. The test code corresponding to each test to be tested generates a test script without requiring the developer to manually write the test script, which is more efficient and less error-prone, and only needs to re-acquire each iteration after the iteration of the subsequent user interface version. The test code corresponding to the control can automatically generate test scripts, and the maintenance cost is low.

Further, in other embodiments, the predetermined categorization rules include:

The operation type information corresponding to the parsed operation control information is classified, so that the operation type information corresponding to the same operation control information is classified into the same attribute class, and the operation type information corresponding to different operation control information is classified into different attributes. class;

The operation control corresponding to each attribute class is used as a control to be tested, and all operation types under each attribute class are used as corresponding operation types of the control to be tested corresponding to the attribute class.

In the embodiment, when the parsed operation control information and the operation type information are classified, the operation control information is used as a classification, for example, when the operation control information is the operation control name, the same control name and The corresponding operation type information is classified into the same attribute class, and different control names and their corresponding operation type information are classified into different attribute classes. The operation control corresponding to the same control name As the control to be tested, and all the operation types under the same control name as the corresponding operation type of the control to be tested. Because the test code corresponding to the operation control corresponding to the same control name is the same or similar, the same control name and its corresponding operation type information are classified into the same attribute class, and the operation control with the same or similar test code can be returned. For a class, after determining the test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to the mapping relationship between the predetermined control, the operation type and the test code, it is only necessary to find the test corresponding to each operation type according to different operation types of the same type of operation control. The code does not need to search for the operation controls of each of the same or different operation control information, which simplifies the search process and determines that the test code corresponding to each control to be tested is more efficient.

Further, in other embodiments, the predetermined classification rule further includes:

Analyze whether the operation control corresponding to each attribute class is included in the preset control list to be tested, and if so, the operation control corresponding to the attribute class is used as the control to be tested.

In this embodiment, after the operation type information corresponding to the same operation control information is classified into the same attribute class, and the operation type information corresponding to the different operation control information is classified into different attribute classes, the operation corresponding to each attribute class is also performed. The control performs filtering, for example, whether the operation control corresponding to each attribute class is included in the preset control list to be tested, and if so, the operation control corresponding to the attribute class is used as the control to be tested. In this way, the user can set a list of the control to be tested according to the test needs in the actual application. For example, according to the focus of each test, the list of the control to be tested in the list of the control to be tested can be added or deleted, and the subsequent control can be controlled. The control to be tested corresponding to the determined test code is the control to be tested required for the test, and the custom acquisition of the test code is realized, and the required test script can be generated more flexibly, and the utility is higher.

As shown in FIG. 5, the second embodiment of the present invention provides a test system for a user interface. Based on the foregoing embodiments, the method further includes:

a determining module 05, configured to determine, according to the configuration file of the user interface, all configuration controls corresponding to the user interface;

The comparison module 06 is configured to compare the determined control to be tested with each configuration control to filter out configuration controls of all the configuration controls that are not to be tested;

The reminder module 07 is configured to generate reminder information to remind the test code to be added to the filtered configuration control, and/or to remind the necessary check for the filtered configuration control.

In this embodiment, after the parsed operation control information and the operation type information are classified according to a predetermined classification rule and the respective to-be-tested controls are determined, further, according to the configuration file of the user interface, The user interface corresponds to all the configuration controls, and compares the determined control to be tested with each configuration control to filter out the configuration controls of all the configuration controls that are not to be tested. Since each control to be tested is determined based on the user's operational behavior for the user interface, the user's operational behavior for the user interface may not involve all the controls on the user interface. Therefore, to comprehensively test the user interface, compare the determined control to be tested with all the configuration controls corresponding to the user interface, and filter out the configuration controls of all the configuration controls that are not to be tested, and filter out The configuration control is the control on the user interface that is not involved in the user's operation behavior for the user interface. Generating reminder information, such as sending reminder information to a predetermined terminal, to remind the user to add a test generation to the filtered configuration control Code, and/or, reminder to check the necessary configuration controls, add test code to the configuration control that is necessary to test, and combine the added test code with the test code corresponding to each control to be tested to form the final complete Test scripts to test the user interface more comprehensively.

It is to be understood that the term "comprises", "comprising", or any other variants thereof, is intended to encompass a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or device comprising a series of elements includes those elements. It also includes other elements that are not explicitly listed, or elements that are inherent to such a process, method, article, or device. An element that is defined by the phrase "comprising a ..." does not exclude the presence of additional equivalent elements in the process, method, item, or device that comprises the element.

Through the description of the above embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that the foregoing embodiment method can be implemented by means of software plus a necessary general hardware platform, and can also be implemented by hardware, but in many cases, the former is A better implementation. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention, which is essential or contributes to the prior art, may be embodied in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium (such as ROM/RAM, disk, The optical disc includes a number of instructions for causing a terminal device (which may be a cell phone, a computer, a server, an air conditioner, or a network device, etc.) to perform the methods described in various embodiments of the present invention.

The preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above with reference to the drawings, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The serial numbers of the embodiments of the present invention are merely for the description, and do not represent the advantages and disadvantages of the embodiments. Additionally, although logical sequences are shown in the flowcharts, in some cases the steps shown or described may be performed in a different order than the ones described herein.

A person skilled in the art can implement the invention in various variants without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the features of one embodiment can be used in another embodiment to obtain a further embodiment. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions and improvements made within the technical concept of the invention are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.

Claims (20)

A test method for a user interface, characterized in that the method comprises the following steps: And receiving, by the user terminal, the preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal, where the preset type log information is the user that the user terminal displays in response to the user for the user terminal. The preset type log information of the operation behavior is detected and recorded during the operation behavior of the interface, and the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information; Parsing the received preset type log information to parse the operation control information and the operation type information included in the log information of each preset type; The parsed operation control information and/or the operation type information are classified according to a predetermined classification rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested; Determining a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generating a test script based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, to use the generated test script to The user interface displayed on the user terminal is tested. The method for testing a user interface according to claim 1, wherein the predetermined classification rule comprises: The operation type information corresponding to the parsed operation control information is classified, so that the operation type information corresponding to the same operation control information is classified into the same attribute class, and the operation type information corresponding to different operation control information is classified into different attributes. class; The operation control corresponding to each attribute class is used as a control to be tested, and all operation types under each attribute class are used as corresponding operation types of the control to be tested corresponding to the attribute class. The method for testing a user interface according to claim 2, wherein the predetermined classification rule comprises: Analyze whether the operation control corresponding to each attribute class is included in the preset control list to be tested, and if so, the operation control corresponding to the attribute class is used as the control to be tested. The method for testing a user interface according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising: Determining, according to the configuration file of the user interface, all configuration controls corresponding to the user interface; Comparing the determined control to be tested with each configuration control to filter out configuration controls of all configuration controls that are not to be tested; Generate a reminder message to remind you to add test code to the filtered configuration control, and/or to remind you of the necessary checks for the filtered configuration controls. The test method of the user interface according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the operation control information includes a control name of the operation, and the operation type information includes a click operation, a slide operation, a scroll operation, and/or a drag operation. . A test system for a user interface, characterized in that the test system comprises: a receiving module, configured to receive, after being sent by the user terminal, the user terminal, Preset type log information corresponding to the user interface, the preset type log information is a pre-detection and record of the operation behavior of the user terminal in response to the user's operation behavior on the user interface displayed on the user terminal. Setting the type log information, the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information; The parsing module is configured to parse the received preset type log information to parse operation control information and operation type information included in each preset type log information; a categorization module, configured to classify the parsed operation control information and/or operation type information according to a predetermined categorization rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested; a generating module, configured to determine a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generate a test script based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, to generate a test script The test script tests the user interface displayed on the user terminal. The test system of the user interface of claim 6, wherein the predetermined categorization rules comprise: The operation type information corresponding to the parsed operation control information is classified, so that the operation type information corresponding to the same operation control information is classified into the same attribute class, and the operation type information corresponding to different operation control information is classified into different attributes. class; The operation control corresponding to each attribute class is used as a control to be tested, and all operation types under each attribute class are used as corresponding operation types of the control to be tested corresponding to the attribute class. The test system of the user interface of claim 7, wherein the predetermined categorization rules comprise: Analyze whether the operation control corresponding to each attribute class is included in the preset control list to be tested, and if so, the operation control corresponding to the attribute class is used as the control to be tested. The test system of the user interface according to claim 6 or 7, further comprising: a determining module, configured to determine, according to the configuration file of the user interface, all configuration controls corresponding to the user interface; The comparison module is configured to compare the determined control to be tested with each configuration control to filter out configuration controls of all configuration controls that are not to be tested; The reminder module is configured to generate a reminder message to remind the user to add a test code to the filtered configuration control, and/or to remind the necessary check for the filtered configuration control. The test system for a user interface according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the operation control information includes a control name of the operation, and the operation type information includes a click operation, a slide operation, a scroll operation, and/or a drag operation. . An electronic device comprising a processing device and a storage device, the storage device storing a test system of a user interface, the test system of the user interface comprising at least one computer readable instruction, the at least one computer readable instruction being readable by the processing device Execute to do the following: And receiving, by the user terminal, preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal, where the preset type log information is that the user terminal is responding to the user pin The preset type log information of the operation behavior is detected and recorded when the operation behavior of the user interface is displayed on the user terminal, and the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information; Parsing the received preset type log information to parse the operation control information and the operation type information included in the log information of each preset type; The parsed operation control information and/or the operation type information are classified according to a predetermined classification rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested; Determining a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generating a test script based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, to use the generated test script to The user interface displayed on the user terminal is tested. The electronic device of claim 11, wherein the predetermined categorization rules comprise: The operation type information corresponding to the parsed operation control information is classified, so that the operation type information corresponding to the same operation control information is classified into the same attribute class, and the operation type information corresponding to different operation control information is classified into different attributes. class; The operation control corresponding to each attribute class is used as a control to be tested, and all operation types under each attribute class are used as corresponding operation types of the control to be tested corresponding to the attribute class. The electronic device of claim 11, wherein the predetermined categorization rules comprise: Analyze whether the operation control corresponding to each attribute class is included in the preset control list to be tested, and if so, the operation control corresponding to the attribute class is used as the control to be tested. The electronic device according to claim 11 or 12, wherein the at least one computer readable instruction is executable by the processing device, and further performing the following operations: Determining, according to the configuration file of the user interface, all configuration controls corresponding to the user interface; Comparing the determined control to be tested with each configuration control to filter out configuration controls of all configuration controls that are not to be tested; Generate a reminder message to remind you to add test code to the filtered configuration control, and/or to remind you of the necessary checks for the filtered configuration controls. The electronic device according to claim 11 or 12, wherein the operation control information includes a control name of the operation, and the operation type information includes a click operation, a slide operation, a scroll operation, and/or a drag operation. A computer readable storage medium having stored thereon at least one computer readable instruction executable by a processing device to: And receiving, by the user terminal, the preset type log information corresponding to the user interface displayed on the user terminal, where the preset type log information is the user that the user terminal displays in response to the user for the user terminal. The preset type log information of the operation behavior is detected and recorded during the operation behavior of the interface, and the preset type log information includes operation control information and operation type information; Parsing the received preset type log information to parse the operation control information and the operation type information included in the log information of each preset type; The parsed operation control information and/or the operation type information are classified according to a predetermined classification rule to determine each control to be tested, and an operation type corresponding to each control to be tested; Determining a test code corresponding to each test to be tested according to a predetermined mapping relationship between the control to be tested, an operation type, and a test code, and generating a test script based on the test code corresponding to each control to be tested, to use the generated test script to The user interface displayed on the user terminal is tested. The computer readable storage medium of claim 16 wherein said predetermined categorization rules comprise: The operation type information corresponding to the parsed operation control information is classified, so that the operation type information corresponding to the same operation control information is classified into the same attribute class, and the operation type information corresponding to different operation control information is classified into different attributes. class; The operation control corresponding to each attribute class is used as a control to be tested, and all operation types under each attribute class are used as corresponding operation types of the control to be tested corresponding to the attribute class. The computer readable storage medium of claim 16 wherein said predetermined categorization rules comprise: Analyze whether the operation control corresponding to each attribute class is included in the preset control list to be tested, and if so, the operation control corresponding to the attribute class is used as the control to be tested. The computer readable storage medium of claim 16 or 17, wherein the at least one computer instruction is further executed by the processing device to: Determining, according to the configuration file of the user interface, all configuration controls corresponding to the user interface; Comparing the determined control to be tested with each configuration control to filter out configuration controls of all configuration controls that are not to be tested; Generate a reminder message to remind you to add test code to the filtered configuration control, and/or to remind you of the necessary checks for the filtered configuration controls. The computer readable storage medium according to claim 16 or 17, wherein the operation control information includes a control name of the operation, and the operation type information includes a click operation, a slide operation, a scroll operation, and/or a drag operation. .

Images