WO2017150117A1 - High strength steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor - Google Patents
High strength steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2017150117A1 WO2017150117A1 PCT/JP2017/004594 JP2017004594W WO2017150117A1 WO 2017150117 A1 WO2017150117 A1 WO 2017150117A1 JP 2017004594 W JP2017004594 W JP 2017004594W WO 2017150117 A1 WO2017150117 A1 WO 2017150117A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- less
- steel sheet
- residual
- temperature
- mass
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D9/00—Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
- C21D9/46—Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for sheet metals
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/60—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing lead, selenium, tellurium, or antimony, or more than 0.04% by weight of sulfur
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a high-strength steel plate and a manufacturing method thereof. Specifically, it has excellent workability at room temperature, and the tensile strength when processing at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C. is much lower than the molding load when processing at room temperature is 980 MPa or more.
- the present invention relates to a high-strength steel sheet and a manufacturing method thereof.
- Steel sheets used for automobile structural parts and the like are required to have a high strength of 980 MPa or more in order to realize collision safety for passengers and fuel efficiency improvement.
- a steel plate is usually formed into a part shape at room temperature, and this forming is subjected to press working. Therefore, the steel sheet is required to have good press workability (hereinafter sometimes simply referred to as workability).
- a TRIP (Transformation Induced Plasticity) steel sheet is known as a steel sheet having both strength and workability (for example, Patent Document 1).
- a TRIP steel sheet is a steel sheet containing metastable austenite (hereinafter sometimes referred to as residual austenite, sometimes referred to as residual ⁇ ), and transforms into martensite when the steel sheet deforms under stress. This has the effect of promoting the hardening of the deformed portion and preventing the concentration of strain, thereby improving the uniform deformability and exhibiting good elongation.
- residual austenite hereinafter sometimes referred to as residual austenite, sometimes referred to as residual ⁇
- the TRIP steel sheet may not be applied depending on the part shape. Therefore, it is desired to reduce the load on the press machine and reduce the molding load at the time of pressing. That is, it is recommended that the strength is low during press working and high strength when used after press working.
- a method of press forming by heating the steel plate to, for example, about 100 ° C. to A 1 point is conceivable.
- the deformation resistance is reduced by warming the steel plate, the forming load during press working can be reduced.
- Patent Documents 2 and 3 are known as techniques for reducing the forming load during press working by warming and forming a steel plate.
- Patent Document 2 describes a high-tensile steel sheet having a tensile strength of 450 MPa or more and excellent in warm formability and shape freezing property, which is suitable for a processing method in which heating is performed in a temperature range of 350 ° C. to A 1 point and press forming. Has been.
- This high-tensile steel sheet satisfies a predetermined component composition, and the ratio of the tensile strength at 450 ° C. to the tensile strength at room temperature is 0.7 or less, and the crystal structure of the steel is that of the martensite phase.
- the volume ratio is 10% or more and 80% or less, the average diameter of each dispersed martensite phase is 8 ⁇ m or less, and the volume ratio of the ferrite phase is the largest in the structure other than martensite.
- the high-strength thin steel sheet described in Patent Document 2 has a small decrease in tensile strength at 150 ° C., and in order to obtain a sufficient effect of reducing the load at the time of forming, after all, it is in a temperature range of 350 ° C. to A 1 point. It is necessary to heat and press mold. However, when heated to such a high temperature, the surface state of the steel sheet is impaired by oxidation, and the energy for heating the steel sheet increases.
- Patent Document 3 describes a high-strength steel sheet that sufficiently reduces strength when warm-formed at 150 to 250 ° C., but can ensure high strength of 980 MPa or more when used at room temperature after forming.
- This high-strength steel sheet has an area ratio of 5 to 20% of retained austenite with respect to the entire structure, and the C concentration (C ⁇ R ) of the retained austenite is controlled to 0.5 to 1.0% by mass.
- the present invention has been made paying attention to the above-mentioned circumstances, and the purpose thereof is excellent in workability at room temperature, in particular, elongation and hole expansibility, for a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more.
- Another object of the present invention is to provide a high-strength steel sheet having a reduced forming load when processed at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C., and a method for producing the same.
- One aspect of the present invention is, in mass%, C: 0.10 to 0.5%, Si: 1.0 to 3%, Mn: 1.5 to 3%, P: more than 0%, 0.1%
- S more than 0%, 0.05% or less
- Al 0.005 to 1%
- N more than 0%, 0.01% or less
- the metal structure of the steel sheet includes polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically showing a diffraction peak of residual ⁇ measured by an X-ray diffraction method.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram for explaining a form in which at least one selected from the group consisting of retained austenite and carbide is connected.
- FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram for explaining a distribution state of bainite and tempered martensite.
- FIG. 3B is a schematic diagram for explaining a distribution state of bainite and tempered martensite.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic view showing an annealing pattern when manufacturing a high-strength steel sheet according to the present invention.
- the metal structure of the high-strength steel sheet is a mixed structure containing polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite.
- the metal structure of the high-strength steel sheet is (A) When the metal structure is observed with a scanning electron microscope, Polygonal ferrite: 10 to 50 area%, Bainite: 10-50 area%, Tempered martensite: 10 to 80% by area satisfied, (B) When the metal structure is measured by the X-ray diffraction method, Residual austenite: 5.0% by volume or more, Residual austenite having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less: 3.5% by volume or more, It is important to satisfy the residual austenite having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less: 2.4% by volume or less.
- Residual ⁇ is a structure necessary for improving uniform deformability and ensuring good elongation by the TRIP effect. Further, the residual ⁇ is a structure necessary for securing strength.
- the volume ratio of residual ⁇ (hereinafter sometimes referred to as V ⁇ R ) is 5.0% or more, preferably 8%, with respect to the entire metal structure. Above, more preferably 10% or more.
- V ⁇ R the volume fraction of residual ⁇ , relative to the entire metal structure, preferably 30% or less, more preferably 25% or less.
- the residual ⁇ may be generated between laths, or an aggregate of lath-like structures, for example, blocks, packets, or old ⁇ grain boundaries on the MA mixed phase in which fresh martensite and residual ⁇ are combined. It may exist in a lump as a part.
- MA is an abbreviation for Martensite-Authentite Constituent.
- the volume ratio V ⁇ R of the residual ⁇ is a value measured by an X-ray diffraction method.
- the high-strength steel sheet has a volume fraction of retained austenite having a carbon concentration of 1.0 mass% or less [hereinafter referred to as V ⁇ R (C), particularly when the metal structure is measured by an X-ray diffraction method. ⁇ 1.0%). ] Is a volume fraction of retained austenite having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less [hereinafter, V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 0.8%). ] Of 2.4% or less is important. That is, as described below, it is important to appropriately generate residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of more than 0.8 mass% and 1.0 mass% or less.
- the load during warming can be sufficiently reduced by setting the volume ratio of residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less to a certain level or more.
- ⁇ TS that is, tensile strength at room temperature (hereinafter sometimes referred to as room temperature TS), it is warm.
- the value (room temperature TS ⁇ warm TS) obtained by subtracting the tensile strength (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “warm TS”) can be used. It can be said that the larger the ⁇ TS, the more the load during warming is sufficiently reduced.
- ⁇ TS Decrease in deformation resistance due to high processing temperature; and (2) Residual ⁇ is unstable at room temperature and improves tensile strength TS, but is stable at warm temperature and does not improve tensile strength TS; A method of using can be considered.
- V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 1.0%) is preferably 4.0% by volume or more, and more preferably 4.5% by volume or more.
- the upper limit of V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 1.0%) is not particularly limited, and the maximum value of V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 1.0%) is equal to the volume ratio of residual ⁇ contained in the steel sheet.
- V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 1.0%) is preferably 10% by volume or less, more preferably 8% by volume or less.
- V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 0.8%) The volume fraction V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 0.8%) of residual ⁇ with a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less was calculated.
- the present inventors have found that the content may be 2.4% by volume or less with respect to the entire metal structure.
- V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 0.8%) is preferably 2.3% by volume or less, more preferably 2.2% by volume or less, and still more preferably 2.1% by volume or less.
- V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 0.8%) is preferably as small as possible, and most preferably 0% by volume.
- V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 1.0%) to 3.5% by volume or more
- ⁇ TS can be increased, and the molding load at warm temperature can be reduced more than the molding load at room temperature.
- V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 0.8%) to 2.4% by volume or less, it is possible to increase the hole expansion ratio ⁇ when the hole expansion processing is performed at room temperature, and to improve the workability at room temperature. .
- the present inventors confirmed that residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration exceeding 1.0 mass% is stable at both room temperature and warm, so that the influence on ⁇ TS and the hole expansion rate ⁇ at room temperature is small. ing.
- the present invention focusing on the carbon concentration of individual residual ⁇ , not the average carbon concentration of residual ⁇ , the residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of more than 0.8 mass% and 1.0 mass% or less is positive. It is greatly different from the conventional technology in that it is generated in the above. That is, even if the amount of residual ⁇ is the same and the average value of the carbon concentration of the residual ⁇ is the same, the amount of residual ⁇ generated and the carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less The present inventors have found that the characteristics obtained are greatly changed if the amount of ⁇ produced is different.
- the volume fraction of residual ⁇ and the average carbon concentration of residual ⁇ are measured by X-ray diffraction after grinding to a thickness of 1 ⁇ 4 of the steel plate and then chemical polishing.
- the measurement principle is ISIJ Int. Vol. 33, 1933, no. 7, p. 776 can be referred to.
- an X-ray diffractometer (RINT-1500) manufactured by Rigaku Corporation was used as the X-ray diffractometer, and Co-K ⁇ rays were used as the X-ray.
- the distribution of carbon concentration of residual ⁇ was determined as follows using three diffraction peaks of (200) ⁇ , (220) ⁇ , and (311) ⁇ measured with the above X-ray diffractometer.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically showing a diffraction peak of residual ⁇ measured by an X-ray diffraction method.
- lattice constant a 0 seek (hkl), and their three lattice constants a 0 (hkl) and arithmetic mean of the determined lattice constants a 0.
- a 0 (hkl) d (hkl) ⁇ (h 2 + k 2 + l 2 ) (2)
- the following equation is obtained from the above equations (7) and (8):
- V.gamma R is the total volume fraction of retained ⁇ to the entire metal structure.
- Polygonal ferrite is softer than bainite and is a structure that acts to increase the elongation of the steel sheet and improve the workability at room temperature.
- the area ratio of polygonal ferrite is 10% or more, preferably 20% or more, more preferably 25% or more with respect to the entire metal structure.
- the area ratio of polygonal ferrite is 50% or less, preferably 45% or less, more preferably 40% or less, based on the entire metal structure. To do.
- the area ratio of the polygonal ferrite can be measured with a scanning electron microscope.
- Bainite generated by the bainite transformation is a structure that effectively acts to concentrate C into austenite and obtain residual ⁇ .
- bainite has the intensity
- the area ratio of bainite is 10% or more, preferably 15% or more, more preferably 20% or more with respect to the entire metal structure.
- the amount of bainite produced becomes excessive, the strength decreases, so that the area ratio of bainite is 50% or less, preferably 40% or less, more preferably 30% or less with respect to the entire metal structure.
- the bainite is a structure in which the average of the interval between at least one selected from the group consisting of residual ⁇ and carbide is 1 ⁇ m or more when observed with a scanning electron microscope after the section of the steel sheet is corroded with nital. In addition to bainitic ferrite with no carbide precipitation, it includes those with partial precipitation of carbide.
- Tempered martensite is a structure that acts to increase both the strength and the hole expansion ratio ⁇ in a well-balanced manner.
- the area ratio of tempered martensite is 10% or more, preferably 15% or more, more preferably 20% or more with respect to the entire metal structure.
- the area ratio of tempered martensite is preferably 80% or less of the entire metal structure, preferably Is 70% or less, more preferably 60% or less.
- the tempered martensite is an average of the interval between at least one selected from the group consisting of residual ⁇ and carbide when less than 1 ⁇ m is selected from the group consisting of residual ⁇ and carbide when the steel sheet is subjected to nital corrosion and then observed with a scanning electron microscope. Organization.
- the average is the distance between the center positions of the adjacent residual ⁇ , the distance between the center positions of the adjacent carbides, or the residual ⁇ when the cross section of the steel sheet is subjected to Nital corrosion and observed with a scanning electron microscope. It is a value obtained by averaging the results of measuring the distance between the center positions of the carbides adjacent to the residual ⁇ .
- the distance between the center positions means the distance between the center positions obtained by obtaining the center positions of each residual ⁇ or each carbide and measuring the most adjacent residual ⁇ , the carbides, or the residual ⁇ and the carbide.
- the center position determines the major axis and minor axis of residual ⁇ or carbide, and is the position where the major axis and minor axis intersect.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram for explaining a form in which at least one selected from the group consisting of retained austenite and carbide is connected.
- the distribution state of bainite and tempered martensite is not particularly limited, and both bainite and tempered martensite may be generated in the old austenite grains, and bainite and tempered martensite are generated for each old austenite grain. It may be.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B The distribution state of bainite and tempered martensite is schematically shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B.
- FIG. 3A shows a state in which both bainite 21 and tempered martensite 22 are mixed and formed in the prior austenite grains 23, and
- FIG. 3B shows bainite 21 and tempered martensite 22 for each prior austenite grain 23. Shows how each is generated.
- the black circle 24 shown in each figure shows the MA mixed phase.
- 3A and 3B are schematic diagrams for explaining the distribution state of bainite and tempered martensite.
- the metal structure of the high-strength steel sheet may be composed of polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite, and residual ⁇ .
- other structures include MA mixed phase, pearlite.
- remainder structures such as fresh martensite. Any remaining structure becomes a starting point of cracking and deteriorates the workability at room temperature, so it is preferable that the remaining structure be as small as possible.
- the remaining structure is preferably 25 area% or less in total when the cross section of the steel plate is subjected to nital corrosion and then observed with a scanning electron microscope.
- the area ratio of polygonal ferrite, bainite, and tempered martensite is measured with a scanning electron microscope, whereas the volume fraction of residual ⁇ is measured with an X-ray diffraction method, and the measurement method is different.
- the total area ratio and volume ratio of these tissues may exceed 100%.
- % in the component composition means mass%.
- the high-strength steel plate has C: 0.10 to 0.5%, Si: 1.0 to 3%, Mn: 1.5 to 3%, P: more than 0%, 0.1% or less, S: 0 %, 0.05% or less, Al: 0.005 to 1%, and N: more than 0%, 0.01% or less.
- the C is an element that increases the strength of the steel sheet, and is also an element that is necessary for stabilizing austenite and securing residual ⁇ . In order to exert such an effect, the C amount is 0.10% or more.
- the amount of C is preferably 0.13% or more, more preferably 0.15% or more. However, if C is contained excessively, weldability deteriorates, so the C content is 0.5% or less.
- the amount of C is preferably 0.30% or less, more preferably 0.25% or less.
- Si is a solid solution strengthening element and is an element that contributes to increasing the strength of the steel sheet. Si is an important element for suppressing the precipitation of carbides and condensing and stabilizing C in austenite to secure residual ⁇ . In order to exert such effects, the Si amount is set to 1.0% or more. The Si amount is preferably 1.2% or more, more preferably 1.3% or more. However, if Si is excessively contained, reverse transformation of polygonal ferrite to austenite does not occur during annealing and soaking, and polygonal ferrite remains excessively, resulting in insufficient strength. Moreover, a scale is remarkably formed at the time of hot rolling, and a scale trace is attached to the steel sheet surface, which deteriorates the surface properties. For these reasons, the Si content is 3% or less. The amount of Si is preferably 2.5% or less, more preferably 2.0% or less.
- Mn is an element that acts as a hardenability improving element, suppresses excessive formation of polygonal ferrite during cooling, and increases the strength of the steel sheet. Mn also contributes to stabilizing the residual ⁇ . In order to exhibit such an effect, the amount of Mn is 1.5% or more. The amount of Mn is preferably 1.8% or more, more preferably 2.0% or more. However, when Mn is contained excessively, the formation of bainite is remarkably suppressed, the desired amount of bainite cannot be secured, and the balance between strength and elongation is deteriorated. In addition, adverse effects such as slab cracking occur. Therefore, the Mn content is 3% or less. The amount of Mn is preferably 2.8% or less, more preferably 2.7% or less.
- P is an inevitable impurity, and if contained excessively, it promotes grain boundary embrittlement due to grain boundary segregation and deteriorates workability at room temperature, so the P content is 0.1% or less.
- the amount of P is preferably 0.08% or less, more preferably 0.05% or less.
- the amount of P is preferably as small as possible, but is usually about 0.001%.
- the S amount is 0.05% or less.
- the amount of S is preferably 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less.
- the amount of S is preferably as small as possible, but is usually about 0.0001%.
- Al is an important element for securing the residual ⁇ by suppressing the precipitation of carbides.
- Al is an element that also acts as a deoxidizer.
- the Al amount is set to 0.005% or more.
- the amount of Al is preferably 0.010% or more, more preferably 0.03% or more.
- the Al content is set to 1% or less.
- the amount of Al is preferably 0.8% or less, more preferably 0.5% or less.
- N is an inevitable impurity, and if it is contained in excess, a large amount of nitride precipitates and becomes the starting point of cracking, and the workability at room temperature deteriorates, so the N amount is 0.01% or less.
- the N amount is preferably 0.008% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less.
- the amount of N is preferably as small as possible, but is usually about 0.001%.
- the basic components of the high-strength steel plate are as described above, and the balance is iron and inevitable impurities.
- As an inevitable impurity mixing of elements brought in depending on the situation of raw materials, materials, manufacturing facilities, etc. is allowed within a range that does not impair the effects of the present invention.
- the high-strength steel plate may further contain at least one element belonging to the following (a) to (e) as another element. Further, the elements belonging to the following (a) to (e) may be contained alone, or a plurality of elements belonging to the following (a) to (e) may be contained in combination.
- (A) Cr and Mo are elements that suppress the formation of excessive polygonal ferrite during cooling and prevent a decrease in strength.
- the Cr content is preferably 0.02% or more, more preferably 0.1% or more, and further preferably 0.2% or more.
- the amount of Mo is preferably 0.02% or more, more preferably 0.1% or more, and further preferably 0.2% or more.
- the content is preferably 1% or less, more preferably 0.8% or less, and still more preferably 0.5% or less.
- the amount of Mo is preferably 1% or less, more preferably 0.8% or less, and still more preferably 0.5% or less.
- Cr and Mo may contain either one or both.
- Ti, Nb, and V are all elements that act to refine the metal structure and improve the strength and toughness of the steel sheet.
- the Ti content is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.015% or more, and further preferably 0.020% or more.
- the Nb content is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.015% or more, and further preferably 0.020% or more.
- the amount of V is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.015% or more, and further preferably 0.020% or more.
- the effect is saturated even if Ti, Nb, and V are contained excessively.
- carbides may precipitate at the grain boundaries and workability at room temperature may deteriorate.
- the Ti content is preferably 0.15% or less, more preferably 0.12% or less, and still more preferably 0.10% or less.
- the Nb content is preferably 0.15% or less, more preferably 0.12% or less, and still more preferably 0.10% or less.
- the V amount is preferably 0.15% or less, more preferably 0.12% or less, and still more preferably 0.10% or less.
- Ti, Nb, and V may contain any 1 type, and may contain 2 or more types chosen arbitrarily.
- Cu and Ni are elements that act to improve the corrosion resistance of the steel sheet.
- the amount of Cu is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.05% or more, and further preferably 0.10% or more.
- the amount of Ni is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.05% or more, and further preferably 0.10% or more.
- the effect is saturated even if Cu and Ni are contained excessively.
- hot workability may deteriorate.
- the Cu content is preferably 1% or less, more preferably 0.8% or less, and still more preferably 0.5% or less.
- the amount of Ni is preferably 1% or less, more preferably 0.8% or less, and still more preferably 0.5% or less.
- Cu and Ni may contain either one or both.
- (D) B is an element that suppresses excessive formation of polygonal ferrite during cooling and prevents a decrease in strength.
- the B content is preferably 0.0001% or more, more preferably 0.0005% or more, and further preferably 0.0010% or more.
- the B content is preferably 0.005% or less, more preferably 0.004% or less, and still more preferably 0.003% or less.
- Ca, Mg, and rare earth elements are all elements that have the effect of finely dispersing inclusions in the steel sheet.
- the Ca content is preferably 0.0001% or more, more preferably 0.0005% or more, and further preferably 0.0010% or more.
- the amount of Mg is preferably 0.0001% or more, more preferably 0.0005% or more, and still more preferably 0.0010% or more.
- the amount of rare earth elements is preferably 0.0001% or more, more preferably 0.0005% or more, and still more preferably 0.0010% or more.
- Ca, Mg, and rare earth elements are contained excessively, forgeability and hot workability may deteriorate.
- the Ca content is preferably 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less, and still more preferably 0.003% or less.
- the Mg content is preferably 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less, and still more preferably 0.003% or less.
- the rare earth element content is preferably 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less, and still more preferably 0.003% or less.
- Ca, Mg, and rare earth elements may contain any 1 type, and may contain 2 or more types chosen arbitrarily.
- the rare earth element means a lanthanoid element (15 elements from La to Lu), Sc (scandium), and Y (yttrium).
- the surface of the high-strength steel sheet has an electrogalvanized (EG) layer, a hot dip galvanized (GI) layer, or an alloyed hot dip galvanized (GA) layer. It may be. That is, the present invention includes high-strength electrogalvanized steel sheets, high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheets, and high-strength galvannealed steel sheets.
- EG electrogalvanized
- GI hot dip galvanized
- GA alloyed hot dip galvanized
- FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing an annealing pattern when manufacturing the high-strength steel sheet, where the horizontal axis represents time (seconds) and the vertical axis represents temperature (° C.).
- a steel sheet satisfying the above component composition is heated to a T1 temperature range of 800 ° C. or more and Ac 3 points or less, and held in the T1 temperature range for 40 seconds or more and soaked (soaking step).
- the steel plate may be a hot-rolled steel plate or a cold-rolled steel plate.
- the soaking temperature in the T1 temperature region is hereinafter referred to as “T1”
- the soaking time in the T1 temperature region is hereinafter referred to as “t1”.
- the holding includes not only constant temperature holding but also a mode in which the temperature fluctuates within the T1 temperature range.
- the soaking temperature T1 is set to 800 ° C. or higher.
- the soaking temperature T1 is preferably 810 ° C. or higher, more preferably 820 ° C. or higher.
- the soaking temperature T1 is set to Ac 3 points or less.
- the soaking temperature T1 is preferably Ac 3 point ⁇ 10 ° C. or lower, more preferably Ac 3 point ⁇ 20 ° C. or lower.
- the soaking time t1 in the T1 temperature range is set to 40 seconds or more.
- the soaking time t1 is preferably 50 seconds or longer, more preferably 80 seconds or longer.
- the upper limit of soaking time t1 is not specifically limited, If soaking time t1 is too long, productivity will worsen. Therefore, the soaking time t1 is preferably 500 seconds or less, and more preferably 450 seconds or less.
- the temperature of Ac 3 point of the steel sheet is represented by the following formula (II) described in “Leslie Steel Material Science” (published by Maruzen Co., Ltd., William C. Leslie, published May 31, 1985, p.273). It can be calculated from In the following formula (II), [] indicates the content (% by mass) of each element, and the content of elements not included in the steel sheet may be calculated as 0% by mass.
- First cooling step After the soaking, when the Ms point represented by the following formula (I) is 350 ° C. or higher, up to an arbitrary cooling stop temperature T2 satisfying 350 ° C. or lower and 100 ° C. or higher, or by the following formula (I) When the represented Ms point is lower than 350 ° C., it is cooled to an arbitrary cooling stop temperature T2 that satisfies the Ms point or lower and 100 ° C. or higher (first cooling step). In the first cooling step, cooling is performed from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C. or the higher one of the cooling stop temperatures T2 at an average cooling rate of 5 ° C./second or more.
- the average cooling rate in the section By controlling the average cooling rate in the section from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C. or the higher one of the cooling stop temperatures T2 after soaking (hereinafter sometimes referred to as CR1), A predetermined amount of polygonal ferrite can be generated. That is, when the average cooling rate CR1 in the section is less than 5 ° C./second, polygonal ferrite is excessively generated and the strength is lowered. Therefore, the average cooling rate CR1 in the above section needs to be controlled to 5 ° C./second or more, preferably 10 ° C./second or more, more preferably 15 ° C./second or more.
- the upper limit of the average cooling rate CR1 in the above section is not particularly limited, but if the average cooling rate CR1 becomes too large, temperature control becomes difficult. Therefore, the average cooling rate CR1 in the above section is preferably 80 ° C./second or less, more preferably 60 ° C./second or less.
- the cooling stop temperature T2 is 100 to 350 ° C. However, when the Ms point calculated by the following formula (I) is less than 350 ° C., the cooling stop temperature T2 is set to 100 ° C. to Ms point.
- cooling stop temperature T2 If the cooling stop temperature T2 is too low, tempered martensite is excessively generated and the amount of residual ⁇ is reduced, so that elongation is lowered and workability at room temperature cannot be improved.
- the cooling stop temperature T2 if the cooling stop temperature T2 is too low, a large amount of residual ⁇ with a carbon concentration exceeding 1.0% by mass is generated, the amount of residual ⁇ with a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less is relatively small, and ⁇ TS is The warm forming load cannot be sufficiently reduced compared with the forming load at room temperature.
- the reason why a large amount of residual ⁇ with a carbon concentration exceeding 1.0% by mass is generated is that film-like residual ⁇ remains between the laths in the tempered martensite, and the carbon concentration of the residual ⁇ is high.
- the cooling stop temperature T2 is set to 100 ° C. or higher.
- the cooling stop temperature T2 is preferably 110 ° C. or higher, more preferably 120 ° C. or higher.
- the cooling stop temperature T2 is set to 350 ° C. or lower.
- the cooling stop temperature T2 is preferably 330 ° C.
- the cooling stop temperature T2 is set to be equal to or lower than the Ms point.
- the cooling stop temperature T2 is preferably Ms point ⁇ 20 ° C. or lower, more preferably Ms point ⁇ 50 ° C. or lower.
- the temperature of the Ms point can be calculated from the following formula (I) in consideration of the polygonal ferrite fraction (Vf) in the formula described in the “Leslie Steel Material Science” (p. 231).
- [] indicates the content (mass%) of each element, and the content of elements not included in the steel sheet may be calculated as 0 mass%.
- Vf represents the polygonal ferrite fraction (area%), but since it is difficult to directly measure the polygonal ferrite fraction during production, the soaking is performed separately under the same conditions as the production conditions for the high-strength steel sheet.
- the polygonal ferrite fraction in the sample obtained by cooling to room temperature at the same average cooling rate as the production conditions of the high-strength steel plate in the first cooling step may be Vf.
- Ms point (° C.) 561 ⁇ 474 ⁇ [C] / (1 ⁇ Vf / 100) ⁇ 33 ⁇ [Mn] ⁇ 17 ⁇ [Ni] ⁇ 17 ⁇ [Cr] ⁇ 21 ⁇ [Mo] (I )
- T3 temperature range After cooling to the above cooling stop temperature T2, it is reheated to a T3 temperature range of more than 350 ° C. and 540 ° C. or less, and held at the T3 temperature range for 50 seconds or longer (reheating step).
- the reheating temperature in the T3 temperature range is hereinafter referred to as “T3”
- the holding time in the T3 temperature range is hereinafter referred to as “t3”.
- the holding includes not only constant temperature holding but also a mode in which the temperature fluctuates within the T3 temperature range.
- the reheating temperature T3 is over 350 ° C.
- the reheating temperature T3 is preferably 360 ° C. or higher, more preferably 370 ° C. or higher.
- the bainite transformation does not proceed sufficiently, the amount of residual ⁇ decreases, and the elongation EL decreases.
- the amount of residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less increases, and the hole expansion rate ⁇ decreases.
- the reheating temperature T3 is set to 540 ° C. or lower.
- the reheating temperature T3 is preferably 520 ° C. or lower, more preferably 500 ° C. or lower.
- the holding time t3 is set to 50 seconds or longer.
- the holding time t3 is preferably 80 seconds or longer, more preferably 100 seconds or longer.
- the upper limit of the holding time t3 is not particularly limited, but in consideration of productivity, for example, 20 minutes or less is preferable.
- Cooling step After holding in the reheating step, cooling is performed at an average cooling rate of 10 ° C./second or more from the T3 temperature range to 300 ° C., and from 300 ° C. to 150 ° C., an average cooling rate of more than 0 ° C./second, 10 ° C. Cool in less than 1 second (second cooling step).
- second cooling step After the above holding, when cooling from the T3 temperature range to 150 ° C., it is important to perform two-stage cooling with 300 ° C. as the boundary, and the high temperature side up to 300 ° C. can increase ⁇ TS by rapid cooling, The molding load during warming can be reduced. On the low temperature side from 300 ° C., the hole expansion ratio ⁇ can be increased by slow cooling, so that the workability at room temperature can be improved.
- the average cooling rate up to 300 ° C. (hereinafter, sometimes referred to as CR2) is too small after reheating, the concentration of C into bainite transformed and untransformed austenite proceeds during cooling, and carbon While the amount of residual ⁇ exceeding 1.0% by mass increases, the amount of residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less decreases. As a result, ⁇ TS decreases, and the molding load during warming cannot be reduced. Therefore, it is necessary to control the average cooling rate CR2 to 10 ° C./second or more, preferably 15 ° C./second or more, more preferably 20 ° C./second or more.
- the upper limit of the average cooling rate CR2 is not particularly limited, but if the average cooling rate CR2 becomes too large, temperature control becomes difficult. Therefore, the average cooling rate CR2 is preferably 80 ° C./second or less, more preferably 60 ° C./second or less.
- the average cooling rate CR3 in the above section needs to be controlled to less than 10 ° C./second, preferably 5 ° C./second or less, more preferably 2 ° C./second or less.
- An electrogalvanized layer, a hot-dip galvanized layer, or an alloyed hot-dip galvanized layer may be formed on the surface of the high-strength steel plate.
- the conditions for forming the electrogalvanized layer, hot dip galvanized layer, or alloyed hot dip galvanized layer are not particularly limited, and conventional electrogalvanized (EG) treatment, hot dip galvanized (GI) treatment, galvannealed alloyed zinc Plating (GA) treatment can be employed. Accordingly, an electrogalvanized steel sheet (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “EG steel sheet”), a hot dip galvanized steel sheet (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “GI steel sheet”), and an alloyed hot dip galvanized steel sheet (hereinafter referred to as “GA steel sheet”). Is sometimes obtained).
- EG steel sheet electrogalvanized steel sheet
- GI steel sheet hot dip galvanized steel sheet
- GA steel sheet alloyed hot dip galvanized steel sheet
- the steel sheet is energized while being immersed in a zinc solution at 55 ° C., for example, and electrogalvanizing is performed.
- the above reheating process may serve as a hot dip galvanizing process. That is, after reheating to the T3 temperature range, the hot dip galvanization may be performed by immersing in a plating bath adjusted to the temperature of the T3 temperature range to serve as both hot dip galvanization and holding in the T3 temperature range. . At this time, the residence time in the T3 temperature region may satisfy the requirement for the holding time t3.
- an alloying treatment may be subsequently performed in the T3 temperature range.
- the residence time in the T3 temperature region may satisfy the requirement for the holding time t3.
- the amount of galvanized adhesion is not particularly limited, and for example, it may be about 10 to 100 g / m 2 per side.
- the plate thickness of the high-strength steel plate is not particularly limited, but may be a thin steel plate having a plate thickness of 3 mm or less, for example.
- the tensile strength (TS) of the high-strength steel plate is 980 MPa or more, and preferably 1100 MPa or more.
- the high-strength steel plate is excellent in workability at room temperature (TS ⁇ EL, ⁇ ).
- the high-strength steel plate preferably has a TS ⁇ elongation (EL) of 16000 MPa ⁇ % or more, and more preferably 18000 MPa ⁇ % or more.
- the high-strength steel sheet preferably has a hole expansion rate ⁇ of 20% or more, and more preferably 25% or more.
- the high-strength steel sheet is excellent in workability at room temperature (TS ⁇ EL, ⁇ ), and the forming load during warming is sufficiently reduced.
- the high-strength steel sheet preferably has a ⁇ TS of 150 MPa or more, and more preferably 180 MPa or more.
- the above-mentioned high-strength steel sheet is suitably used as a material for structural parts of automobiles.
- Structural parts of automobiles include, for example, front and rear side members and crashing parts such as crash boxes, pillars and other reinforcements (for example, bears, center pillar reinforcements, etc.), roof rail reinforcements, side sills , Body components such as floor members and kick sections, shock-absorbing parts such as bumper reinforcements and door impact beams, and seat parts.
- One aspect of the present invention is, in mass%, C: 0.10 to 0.5%, Si: 1.0 to 3%, Mn: 1.5 to 3%, P: more than 0%, 0.1%
- S more than 0%, 0.05% or less
- Al 0.005 to 1%
- N more than 0%, 0.01% or less
- the metal structure of the steel sheet includes polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite.
- the elongation and hole expandability at room temperature are good, and the molding load when processing at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C. is markedly reduced from the molding load when processing at room temperature.
- a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more can be provided.
- the high-strength steel sheet further contains at least one element selected from the group consisting of Cr: more than 0%, 1% or less, and Mo: more than 0%, 1% or less as other elements, as other elements. Also good.
- the high-strength steel plate as other elements, in mass%, Ti: more than 0%, 0.15% or less, Nb: more than 0%, 0.15% or less, and V: more than 0%, You may contain at least 1 sort (s) chosen from the group which consists of 0.15% or less.
- the high-strength steel sheet further contains at least one element selected from the group consisting of Cu: more than 0%, less than 1%, and Ni: more than 0%, less than 1% as other elements. May be.
- the high-strength steel sheet may further contain B: more than 0% and 0.005% or less in terms of mass% as other elements.
- the high-strength steel sheet further includes, as other elements, mass%, Ca: more than 0%, 0.01% or less, Mg: more than 0%, 0.01% or less, and rare earth elements: more than 0%. , At least one selected from the group consisting of 0.01% or less.
- the high-strength steel sheet includes a high-strength steel sheet having an electrogalvanized layer, a hot-dip galvanized layer, or an alloyed hot-dip galvanized layer on the surface.
- a steel sheet satisfying the above component composition is heated to a T1 temperature range of 800 ° C. or higher and Ac 3 points or lower, and held in the T1 temperature range for 40 seconds or more to soak.
- the Ms point represented by the following formula (I) is 350 ° C. or higher after the heating step and soaking, up to any cooling stop temperature T2 that satisfies 350 ° C. or lower and 100 ° C. or higher, or the following formula (I)
- the cooling stop temperature T2 is less than the Ms point and is 100 ° C. or higher, and from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C.
- Vf is the same average cooling rate as the production conditions for the high-strength steel plate in the first cooling step after separately performing the soaking step under the same conditions as the production conditions for the high-strength steel plate.
- [] has shown content (mass%) of each element, and content of the element which is not contained in a steel plate is calculated as 0 mass%.
- electrogalvanization may be performed after the second cooling step.
- hot dip galvanization or alloyed hot dip galvanization may be performed in the reheating step.
- the component composition and metal structure of the steel sheet are appropriately controlled, and in particular, the carbon concentration of residual ⁇ is strictly controlled, so that the elongation and hole expansibility at room temperature are good, It is possible to provide a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more and a method for producing the same, in which a forming load when processing at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C. is significantly reduced as compared with a forming load when processing at room temperature.
- a steel material was manufactured by melting steel containing the components shown in Table 1 below, the balance being iron and inevitable impurities.
- the obtained steel material was heated and held at 1250 ° C. for 30 minutes, then hot-rolled so that the reduction rate was about 90% and the finish rolling temperature was 920 ° C. From this temperature, the steel was wound at an average cooling rate of 30 ° C./second. It was cooled to a take-up temperature of 600 ° C. and wound up. After winding, it was cooled to room temperature to produce a hot-rolled steel plate having a thickness of 2.6 mm.
- the obtained hot-rolled steel sheet was pickled to remove the surface scale, and then cold-rolled at a cold rolling rate of 46% to produce a cold-rolled steel sheet having a thickness of 1.4 mm.
- the obtained cold-rolled steel sheet was continuously annealed to produce a test material. That is, the obtained cold-rolled steel sheet was heated to a soaking temperature T1 (° C.) shown in the following Table 2-1 or Table 2-2, and a soaking time t1 (shown in the following Table 2-1 or Table 2-2). Second) and soaking, and then cooled to the cooling stop temperature T2 (° C.) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below.
- the average cooling rate CR1 (° C./second) from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C. or higher of the cooling stop temperature T2 is shown in the following Table 2-1 or Table 2-2.
- Tables 2-1 and 2-2 below also show the composition of the components shown in Table 1 below and the Ms point (° C.) calculated based on the above formula (I).
- the reheating temperature T3 (° C.) to 300 ° C. is cooled at an average cooling rate CR2 (° C./second) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below, and from 300 ° C. to 150 ° C., Cooling was performed at an average cooling rate CR3 (° C./second) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below.
- test materials obtained by continuous annealing were subjected to the following plating treatment to produce EG steel plates, GI steel plates, and GA steel plates.
- Electrogalvanizing (EG) treatment After continuous annealing, it is cooled to room temperature, and then the specimen is immersed in a galvanizing bath at 55 ° C., subjected to electrogalvanizing treatment at a current density of 30 to 50 A / dm 2 , washed with water and dried to provide an EG steel sheet. Manufactured. The amount of electrogalvanized adhesion was 10 to 100 g / m 2 per side.
- Table 2-1 The categories of the obtained specimens are shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below.
- cold rolling indicates a cold rolled steel sheet
- EG indicates an EG steel sheet
- GI indicates a GI steel sheet
- GA indicates a GA steel sheet.
- Table 3-1 or Table 3-2 The measurement results are shown in Table 3-1 or Table 3-2 below.
- F represents the area ratio of polygonal ferrite
- B represents the area ratio of bainite
- TM represents the area ratio of tempered martensite.
- the balance is residual ⁇ , MA mixed phase in which fresh martensite and residual ⁇ are combined, pearlite, and fresh martensite.
- the carbon concentration in the residual ⁇ is measured by the procedure described above, and the volume ratio of the residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 1.0 mass% or less [V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 1.0%)] with respect to the entire metal structure, and The volume fraction [V ⁇ R (C ⁇ 0.8%)] of residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less was calculated.
- TS was 980 MPa or more
- TS ⁇ EL was 16000 MPa ⁇ % or more and ⁇ was 20% or more
- ⁇ TS was 150 MPa or more
- all of TS, TSxEL, (lambda), and (DELTA) TS satisfy a reference value was set as the pass.
- the case where any of TS, TS ⁇ EL, ⁇ , or ⁇ TS did not satisfy the reference value was regarded as unacceptable.
- Table 1 The following can be considered from Table 1, Table 2-1, Table 2-2, Table 3-1, and Table 3-2.
- No. 1, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 20, 22, 23, 26 to 31, 33, 37, 38, 40, and 42 are examples that satisfy the requirements defined in the present invention.
- the TS measured at room temperature is 980 MPa or higher and has high strength. Further, TS ⁇ EL and ⁇ satisfy the acceptance criteria of the present invention, and the processability at room temperature is good. Furthermore, since ⁇ TS satisfied the acceptance criteria of the present invention, the molding load during warming could be reduced.
- No. 2 to 6, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 32, 34 to 36, 39, and 41 are examples that do not satisfy any of the requirements defined in the present invention.
- at least one of the properties of strength, workability at room temperature, and reduction of warm forming load is deteriorated.
- No. 2, 6, 12, and 41 are examples in which the average cooling rate CR3 from 300 ° C. to 150 ° C. after holding in the reheating step is too large, and a large amount of residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 0.8 mass% or less is generated. ⁇ was reduced and the processability at room temperature could not be improved.
- No. 3, 5, and 39 the average cooling rate CR2 from the reheating temperature (the holding temperature in the reheating process) to 300 ° C. is too small, and the residual ⁇ amount with a carbon concentration of 1.0 mass% or less cannot be secured. In this example, ⁇ TS was small, and the molding load during warming could not be reduced.
- No. 3 is an example simulating the above-mentioned Patent Document 1. As described in paragraph [0128] of the above-mentioned Patent Document 1, the average cooling rate to room temperature after holding was set to 5 ° C./second.
- No. 4, 19, and 32 are examples in which the cooling stop temperature T2 after soaking is too high.
- No. In 4, 19, and 32 since tempered martensite was not generated or the amount of generation was small, TS at room temperature was low, and strength could not be secured.
- No. In 4, 19, and 32 since a large amount of residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 0.8 mass% or less was generated, ⁇ was small, and workability at room temperature could not be improved.
- the retention time t3 was relatively long, and the amount of polygonal ferrite produced was relatively small, so it is considered that bainite was excessively produced. That is, the smaller the amount of polygonal ferrite produced, the less likely it is that C is concentrated in the surrounding austenite, so the bainite transformation is considered to occur faster.
- No. No. 9 is an example in which polygonal ferrite was excessively generated because the average cooling rate CR1 in the section from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C. was too small after soaking. As a result, no. No. 9 could not secure the desired TS.
- No. 11 is an example in which polygonal ferrite was hardly generated because the soaking temperature T1 was too high. As a result, no. No. 11, TS ⁇ EL was low, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved.
- No. 14 is an example in which the cooling stop temperature T2 after soaking is too low.
- No. 14 bainite was not generated, and tempered martensite was excessively generated, so that the amount of residual ⁇ generated could not be secured.
- TS ⁇ EL was low, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved.
- No. No. 14 could not secure the amount of residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less, so ⁇ TS was small, and the molding load during warming could not be reduced.
- No. No. 16 is an example in which polygonal ferrite is excessively generated because the soaking temperature T1 is too low. As a result, no. No. 16 could not secure the desired TS. No. No. 16, TS ⁇ EL decreased, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved. This is presumably because the work structure introduced during cold rolling remained.
- No. 18 is an example in which the reheating temperature T3 is too high. No. In No. 18, bainite hardly formed and the amount of residual ⁇ could not be secured, so TS ⁇ EL was lowered and workability at room temperature could not be improved. No. In No. 18, since residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less was excessively generated, ⁇ became small, and workability at room temperature could not be improved.
- No. No. 21 is an example in which the amount of residual ⁇ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less could not be secured because the reheating temperature T3 was too low. As a result, no. In No. 21, ⁇ TS was small, and the molding load during warming could not be reduced.
- No. No. 24 is an example in which a desired residual ⁇ amount could not be ensured because the soaking time t1 was too short. As a result, no. In No. 24, TS ⁇ EL decreased, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved.
- No. 25 is an example in which the holding time t3 is too short. No. 25, because the production amount of bainite and residual ⁇ could not be ensured, TS ⁇ EL decreased, and since the residual ⁇ with a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less was excessively generated, ⁇ became small, at room temperature. It was not possible to improve the workability.
- No. 34 to 36 are examples in which the component composition does not satisfy the requirements defined in the present invention.
- No. 36 since the amount of Mn was too small, polygonal ferrite was excessively generated, TS was lowered, and the strength could not be secured. No. For 36, the amount of residual ⁇ produced could not be secured, so TS ⁇ EL decreased, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved. No. No. 36 was an example in which the amount of residual ⁇ with a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less could not be ensured, ⁇ TS became small, and the molding load during warm could not be reduced.
- the component composition and metal structure of the steel sheet are appropriately controlled, and in particular, the carbon concentration of residual ⁇ is strictly controlled, so that the elongation and hole expansibility at room temperature are good,
- a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more and a method for producing the same, in which a forming load when processing at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C. is significantly reduced as compared with a forming load when processing at room temperature.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Thermal Sciences (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、高強度鋼板、及びその製造方法に関する。詳細には、室温での加工性に優れ、且つ、100~350℃の温間で加工するときの成形荷重が、室温で加工するときの成形荷重よりも格段に低減された引張強度が980MPa以上の高強度鋼板、及びその製造方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a high-strength steel plate and a manufacturing method thereof. Specifically, it has excellent workability at room temperature, and the tensile strength when processing at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C. is much lower than the molding load when processing at room temperature is 980 MPa or more. The present invention relates to a high-strength steel sheet and a manufacturing method thereof.
自動車の構造部品等に用いられる鋼板には、乗客のための衝突安全性と、燃費改善とを実現するため、980MPa以上の高強度が求められる。一方、鋼板は、通常、室温で部品形状に成形され、この成形にはプレス加工が施される。したがって、鋼板には、プレス加工性(以下、単に、加工性ということがある。)が良好であることが求められる。 Steel sheets used for automobile structural parts and the like are required to have a high strength of 980 MPa or more in order to realize collision safety for passengers and fuel efficiency improvement. On the other hand, a steel plate is usually formed into a part shape at room temperature, and this forming is subjected to press working. Therefore, the steel sheet is required to have good press workability (hereinafter sometimes simply referred to as workability).
強度と加工性とを兼ね備えた鋼板として、TRIP(Transformation Induced Plasticity;変態誘起塑性)鋼板が知られている(例えば、特許文献1)。TRIP鋼板は、準安定オーステナイト(以下、残留オーステナイトということがあり、残留γと表記することがある。)を含む鋼板であり、鋼板が応力を受けて変形する際に、マルテンサイトに変態することによって変形部の硬化を促し、歪の集中を防ぐ効果があり、それにより、均一変形能が向上して良好な伸びを発揮する。このようにTRIP鋼板の伸びは良好であるが、鋼板自体の強度が高いため、プレス加工時の成形荷重が大きく、プレス機への負荷が過大になる。したがって、部品形状によってはTRIP鋼板を適用できないことがある。そこで、プレス機への負荷を低減し、プレス加工時の成形荷重を小さくすることが望まれる。すなわち、プレス加工時は低強度で、プレス加工後の使用時は高強度となることが推奨される。 A TRIP (Transformation Induced Plasticity) steel sheet is known as a steel sheet having both strength and workability (for example, Patent Document 1). A TRIP steel sheet is a steel sheet containing metastable austenite (hereinafter sometimes referred to as residual austenite, sometimes referred to as residual γ), and transforms into martensite when the steel sheet deforms under stress. This has the effect of promoting the hardening of the deformed portion and preventing the concentration of strain, thereby improving the uniform deformability and exhibiting good elongation. Thus, although the elongation of the TRIP steel sheet is good, the strength of the steel sheet itself is high, so that the forming load during press working is large and the load on the press machine is excessive. Therefore, the TRIP steel sheet may not be applied depending on the part shape. Therefore, it is desired to reduce the load on the press machine and reduce the molding load at the time of pressing. That is, it is recommended that the strength is low during press working and high strength when used after press working.
プレス加工時の成形荷重を小さくする方法として、鋼板を、例えば、100℃~A1点程度に温めてプレス成形する方法が考えられる。一般的に、鋼板を温めることによって変形抵抗が減少するため、プレス加工時の成形荷重を小さくできる。 As a method of reducing the forming load during the press working, a method of press forming by heating the steel plate to, for example, about 100 ° C. to A 1 point is conceivable. In general, since the deformation resistance is reduced by warming the steel plate, the forming load during press working can be reduced.
鋼板を温めて成形することにより、プレス加工時の成形荷重を小さくする技術としては、特許文献2、3に記載の技術が知られている。 Techniques described in Patent Documents 2 and 3 are known as techniques for reducing the forming load during press working by warming and forming a steel plate.
特許文献2には、350℃~A1点の温度域に加熱してプレス成形する加工方法に適した温間成形性及び形状凍結性に優れた引張強さ450MPa以上の高張力薄鋼板が記載されている。この高張力薄鋼板は、所定の成分組成を満足し、且つ、室温における引張強さに対する450℃における引張強さの比が、0.7以下であり、鋼の結晶組織は、マルテンサイト相の体積率が10%以上80%以下であり、且つ、分散しているマルテンサイト相それぞれの平均径が8μm以下で、マルテンサイト以外の組織ではフェライト相の体積率が最も大きくなっている。上記特許文献2に記載の高張力薄鋼板は、150℃における引張強度の低下度合いは小さく、充分な成形時荷重低減効果を得るには、結局のところ、350℃~A1点の温度域に加熱してプレス成形する必要がある。しかし、このような高い温度に加熱すると、酸化により鋼板の表面状態が損なわれるとともに、鋼板を加熱するためのエネルギーが増大する。 Patent Document 2 describes a high-tensile steel sheet having a tensile strength of 450 MPa or more and excellent in warm formability and shape freezing property, which is suitable for a processing method in which heating is performed in a temperature range of 350 ° C. to A 1 point and press forming. Has been. This high-tensile steel sheet satisfies a predetermined component composition, and the ratio of the tensile strength at 450 ° C. to the tensile strength at room temperature is 0.7 or less, and the crystal structure of the steel is that of the martensite phase. The volume ratio is 10% or more and 80% or less, the average diameter of each dispersed martensite phase is 8 μm or less, and the volume ratio of the ferrite phase is the largest in the structure other than martensite. The high-strength thin steel sheet described in Patent Document 2 has a small decrease in tensile strength at 150 ° C., and in order to obtain a sufficient effect of reducing the load at the time of forming, after all, it is in a temperature range of 350 ° C. to A 1 point. It is necessary to heat and press mold. However, when heated to such a high temperature, the surface state of the steel sheet is impaired by oxidation, and the energy for heating the steel sheet increases.
特許文献3には、150~250℃での温間成形時には充分に強度低下する一方、成形後の室温での使用時には980MPa以上の高強度が確保できる高強度鋼板が記載されている。この高強度鋼板は、全組織に対する面積率で、残留オーステナイトを5~20%含み、該残留オーステナイトのC濃度(CγR)は0.5~1.0質量%に制御されている。 Patent Document 3 describes a high-strength steel sheet that sufficiently reduces strength when warm-formed at 150 to 250 ° C., but can ensure high strength of 980 MPa or more when used at room temperature after forming. This high-strength steel sheet has an area ratio of 5 to 20% of retained austenite with respect to the entire structure, and the C concentration (Cγ R ) of the retained austenite is controlled to 0.5 to 1.0% by mass.
ところで、上記構造部品等の形状によっては、温間プレスのみではなく、温間でのプレス成形に加え、さらに室温でもプレス成形を施す場合がある。よって、上記部品等に用いられる鋼板には、室温での加工性に優れていることも求められる。 By the way, depending on the shape of the structural component, etc., not only warm pressing but also warm pressing may be performed at room temperature. Therefore, the steel plates used for the above parts are also required to have excellent workability at room temperature.
上記特許文献3に記載の高強度鋼板の加熱温度は、150~250℃であるため、上記特許文献2に記載の高張力薄鋼板で発生するような問題は生じないが、上記特許文献3では、室温での加工性は考慮されていない。 Since the heating temperature of the high-strength steel sheet described in Patent Document 3 is 150 to 250 ° C., the problem that occurs in the high-tensile steel sheet described in Patent Document 2 does not occur. The processability at room temperature is not considered.
本発明は、上記のような事情に着目してなされたものであって、その目的は、引張強度が980MPa以上の高強度鋼板について、室温での加工性、特に、伸び及び穴拡げ性に優れ、且つ、100~350℃の温間で加工するときの成形荷重を低減した高強度鋼板、及びその製造方法を提供することにある。 The present invention has been made paying attention to the above-mentioned circumstances, and the purpose thereof is excellent in workability at room temperature, in particular, elongation and hole expansibility, for a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more. Another object of the present invention is to provide a high-strength steel sheet having a reduced forming load when processed at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C., and a method for producing the same.
本発明の一局面は、質量%で、C:0.10~0.5%、Si:1.0~3%、Mn:1.5~3%、P:0%超、0.1%以下、S:0%超、0.05%以下、Al:0.005~1%、及びN:0%超、0.01%以下を満足し、残部が鉄及び不可避不純物からなる鋼板であり、(1)該鋼板の金属組織は、ポリゴナルフェライト、ベイナイト、焼戻しマルテンサイト、及び残留オーステナイトを含み、(2)前記金属組織を走査型電子顕微鏡で観察したときに、金属組織全体に対して、ポリゴナルフェライト:10~50面積%、ベイナイト:10~50面積%、焼戻しマルテンサイト:10~80面積%を満足し、(3)前記金属組織をX線回折法で測定したときに、金属組織全体に対して、残留オーステナイト:5.0体積%以上、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留オーステナイト:3.5体積%以上、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留オーステナイト:2.4体積%以下を満足することを特徴とする高強度鋼板である。 One aspect of the present invention is, in mass%, C: 0.10 to 0.5%, Si: 1.0 to 3%, Mn: 1.5 to 3%, P: more than 0%, 0.1% Hereinafter, S: more than 0%, 0.05% or less, Al: 0.005 to 1%, and N: more than 0%, 0.01% or less, with the balance being iron and inevitable impurities. (1) The metal structure of the steel sheet includes polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite. (2) When the metal structure is observed with a scanning electron microscope, Polygonal ferrite: 10-50 area%, bainite: 10-50 area%, tempered martensite: 10-80 area%, (3) When the metal structure was measured by X-ray diffraction, Residual austenite: 5.0% by volume or less with respect to the entire structure Residual austenite having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less: 3.5% by volume or more, and retained austenite having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less: 2.4% by volume or less. It is a steel plate.
前記並びにその他の本発明の目的、特徴及び利点は、以下の詳細な記載と添付図面から明らかになるであろう。 The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
以下、本発明に係る実施形態について説明するが、本発明は、これらに限定されるものではない。 Hereinafter, embodiments according to the present invention will be described, but the present invention is not limited thereto.
まず、本発明の実施形態に係る高強度鋼板の金属組織について説明する。 First, the metal structure of the high-strength steel sheet according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described.
上記高強度鋼板の金属組織は、ポリゴナルフェライト、ベイナイト、焼戻しマルテンサイト、及び残留オーステナイトを含む混合組織である。 The metal structure of the high-strength steel sheet is a mixed structure containing polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite.
そして、上記高強度鋼板の金属組織は、
(A)上記金属組織を走査型電子顕微鏡で観察したときに、金属組織全体に対して、
ポリゴナルフェライト:10~50面積%、
ベイナイト:10~50面積%、
焼戻しマルテンサイト:10~80面積%を満足し、
(B)上記金属組織をX線回折法で測定したときに、金属組織全体に対して、
残留オーステナイト:5.0体積%以上、
炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留オーステナイト:3.5体積%以上、
炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留オーステナイト:2.4体積%以下
を満足することが重要である。
And the metal structure of the high-strength steel sheet is
(A) When the metal structure is observed with a scanning electron microscope,
Polygonal ferrite: 10 to 50 area%,
Bainite: 10-50 area%,
Tempered martensite: 10 to 80% by area satisfied,
(B) When the metal structure is measured by the X-ray diffraction method,
Residual austenite: 5.0% by volume or more,
Residual austenite having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less: 3.5% by volume or more,
It is important to satisfy the residual austenite having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less: 2.4% by volume or less.
まず、本発明を特徴づける上記(B)の要件について説明した後、上記(A)の要件について説明する。 First, after describing the requirement (B) that characterizes the present invention, the requirement (A) will be described.
[残留γ]
残留γは、TRIP効果により、均一変形能を向上させて良好な伸びを確保するために必要な組織である。また、残留γは、強度を確保するためにも必要な組織である。
[Residual γ]
Residual γ is a structure necessary for improving uniform deformability and ensuring good elongation by the TRIP effect. Further, the residual γ is a structure necessary for securing strength.
前記高強度鋼板では、こうした効果を発揮させるために、金属組織全体に対して、残留γの体積率(以下、VγRと表記することがある。)を5.0%以上、好ましくは8%以上、より好ましくは10%以上とする。しかし、残留γの生成量が過剰になると、穴拡げ率λが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できない。したがって、前記高強度鋼板では、残留γの体積率VγRは、金属組織全体に対して、好ましくは30%以下、より好ましくは25%以下とする。 In the high-strength steel sheet, in order to exert such effects, the volume ratio of residual γ (hereinafter sometimes referred to as Vγ R ) is 5.0% or more, preferably 8%, with respect to the entire metal structure. Above, more preferably 10% or more. However, when the amount of residual γ produced becomes excessive, the hole expansion rate λ decreases, and the processability at room temperature cannot be improved. Thus, in the high strength steel sheet, the volume fraction V.gamma R of residual γ, relative to the entire metal structure, preferably 30% or less, more preferably 25% or less.
上記残留γは、ラス間に生成することもあれば、ラス状組織の集合体、例えば、ブロックやパケット等や旧γ粒界上に、フレッシュマルテンサイトと残留γとが複合したMA混合相の一部として塊状に存在することもある。MAとは、Martensite-Austenite Constituentの略である。 The residual γ may be generated between laths, or an aggregate of lath-like structures, for example, blocks, packets, or old γ grain boundaries on the MA mixed phase in which fresh martensite and residual γ are combined. It may exist in a lump as a part. MA is an abbreviation for Martensite-Authentite Constituent.
上記残留γの体積率VγRは、X線回折法で測定した値である。 The volume ratio Vγ R of the residual γ is a value measured by an X-ray diffraction method.
前記高強度鋼板は、特に、金属組織をX線回折法で測定したときに、金属組織全体に対して、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留オーステナイトの体積率[以下、VγR(C≦1.0%)と表記することがある。]が3.5%以上、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留オーステナイトの体積率[以下、VγR(C≦0.8%)と表記することがある。]が2.4%以下を満足することが重要である。すなわち、以下に説明する通り、炭素濃度が0.8質量%超、1.0質量%以下の残留γを適切に生成させることが重要である。 The high-strength steel sheet has a volume fraction of retained austenite having a carbon concentration of 1.0 mass% or less [hereinafter referred to as Vγ R (C), particularly when the metal structure is measured by an X-ray diffraction method. ≦ 1.0%). ] Is a volume fraction of retained austenite having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less [hereinafter, Vγ R (C ≦ 0.8%). ] Of 2.4% or less is important. That is, as described below, it is important to appropriately generate residual γ having a carbon concentration of more than 0.8 mass% and 1.0 mass% or less.
まず、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γの体積率を一定以上とすることで、温間での荷重を充分に低減できることについて説明する。 First, it will be explained that the load during warming can be sufficiently reduced by setting the volume ratio of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less to a certain level or more.
温間成形時の荷重低減の指標としては、上記特許文献3に示されている通り、ΔTS、すなわち、室温での引張強度(以下、室温TSと表記することがある。)から、温間での引張強度(以下、温間TSと表記することがある。)を引いた値(室温TS-温間TS)を用いることができる。ΔTSが大きいほど温間での荷重が充分に低減されているといえる。 As an index of load reduction at the time of warm forming, as shown in Patent Document 3 above, ΔTS, that is, tensile strength at room temperature (hereinafter sometimes referred to as room temperature TS), it is warm. The value (room temperature TS−warm TS) obtained by subtracting the tensile strength (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “warm TS”) can be used. It can be said that the larger the ΔTS, the more the load during warming is sufficiently reduced.
上記ΔTSの値を大きくするには、
(1)加工温度の高温化による変形抵抗の低下;及び
(2)残留γは、室温では不安定なため引張強度TSを向上させるが、温間では安定なため引張強度TSを向上させないこと;
を利用する方法が考えられる。
To increase the value of ΔTS,
(1) Decrease in deformation resistance due to high processing temperature; and (2) Residual γ is unstable at room temperature and improves tensile strength TS, but is stable at warm temperature and does not improve tensile strength TS;
A method of using can be considered.
そして、上記(1)は、材料によらないことから、ΔTSがより大きい鋼板を得るには、上記(2)に示す残留γを存在させることが有効であること、そして、そのためには、炭素濃度の低い残留γ、具体的には、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γの体積率VγR(C≦1.0%)を、金属組織全体に対して、3.5質量%以上積極的に生成させればよいことを見出した。VγR(C≦1.0%)は、好ましくは4.0体積%以上、より好ましくは4.5体積%以上である。VγR(C≦1.0%)の上限は、特に限定されず、VγR(C≦1.0%)の最大値は、鋼板に含まれる残留γの体積率と等しくなる。VγR(C≦1.0%)は、好ましくは10体積%以下、より好ましくは8体積%以下である。 Since (1) does not depend on the material, it is effective to have the residual γ shown in (2) above in order to obtain a steel plate having a larger ΔTS, and for that purpose, carbon The residual γ having a low concentration, specifically, the volume fraction Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%) of the residual γ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less is 3.5% by mass with respect to the entire metal structure. It has been found that the generation is positive. Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%) is preferably 4.0% by volume or more, and more preferably 4.5% by volume or more. The upper limit of Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%) is not particularly limited, and the maximum value of Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%) is equal to the volume ratio of residual γ contained in the steel sheet. Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%) is preferably 10% by volume or less, more preferably 8% by volume or less.
上述したように、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γを積極的に生成させることにより、温間での成形荷重を低減できることがわかった。しかしながら、炭素濃度が低すぎる残留γが多量に生成すると、室温で穴拡げ加工したときの初期に残留γが硬質なフレッシュマルテンサイト(FM)に変態し、歪の集中箇所となり、穴拡げ率λが著しく低下し、室温での加工性が劣化することがわかった。そこで、穴拡げ率λを高め、室温での加工性を改善するには、炭素濃度が低すぎる残留γの生成は抑制する必要がある。 As described above, it was found that the molding load during warming can be reduced by positively generating residual γ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less. However, if a large amount of residual γ with a too low carbon concentration is generated, the residual γ is transformed into hard fresh martensite (FM) at the initial stage of hole expansion at room temperature, and becomes a strain concentrated portion, and the hole expansion ratio λ As a result, it was found that the workability at room temperature deteriorates. Therefore, in order to increase the hole expansion ratio λ and improve the processability at room temperature, it is necessary to suppress the formation of residual γ with a carbon concentration that is too low.
こうした観点に基づき、残留γの炭素濃度と室温での加工性との関係について検討したところ、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γの体積率VγR(C≦0.8%)を、金属組織全体に対して、2.4体積%以下とすればよいことを見出した。VγR(C≦0.8%)は、好ましくは2.3体積%以下、より好ましくは2.2体積%以下、更に好ましくは2.1体積%以下である。VγR(C≦0.8%)はできるだけ少ない方が好ましく、最も好ましくは0体積%である。 Based on these viewpoints, the relationship between the carbon concentration of residual γ and the workability at room temperature was examined. The volume fraction Vγ R (C ≦ 0.8%) of residual γ with a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less was calculated. The present inventors have found that the content may be 2.4% by volume or less with respect to the entire metal structure. Vγ R (C ≦ 0.8%) is preferably 2.3% by volume or less, more preferably 2.2% by volume or less, and still more preferably 2.1% by volume or less. Vγ R (C ≦ 0.8%) is preferably as small as possible, and most preferably 0% by volume.
以上の通り、VγR(C≦1.0%)を3.5体積%以上とすることにより、ΔTSを大きくすることができ、温間での成形荷重を室温での成形荷重よりも低減でき、VγR(C≦0.8%)を2.4体積%以下に抑えることによって、室温で穴拡げ加工したときの穴拡げ率λを大きくすることができ、室温での加工性を改善できる。 As described above, by setting Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%) to 3.5% by volume or more, ΔTS can be increased, and the molding load at warm temperature can be reduced more than the molding load at room temperature. By suppressing Vγ R (C ≦ 0.8%) to 2.4% by volume or less, it is possible to increase the hole expansion ratio λ when the hole expansion processing is performed at room temperature, and to improve the workability at room temperature. .
なお、炭素濃度が1.0質量%を超える残留γは、室温でも温間でも安定しているため、ΔTS及び室温での穴拡げ率λへの影響は小さいことを本発明者らは確認している。 The present inventors confirmed that residual γ having a carbon concentration exceeding 1.0 mass% is stable at both room temperature and warm, so that the influence on ΔTS and the hole expansion rate λ at room temperature is small. ing.
ここで、従来技術と本発明との関係について説明する。
残留γの安定度を残留γの炭素濃度で制御する考え方は、従来から知られている。そして、例えば、上記特許文献3のように、残留γの炭素濃度の平均値を所定の範囲に制御することによって、150~250℃での成形時における強度を低下させる技術も既に知られている。
Here, the relationship between the prior art and the present invention will be described.
The concept of controlling the stability of the residual γ with the carbon concentration of the residual γ has been conventionally known. For example, as in Patent Document 3, a technique for reducing the strength at the time of molding at 150 to 250 ° C. by controlling the average value of the carbon concentration of residual γ within a predetermined range is already known. .
これに対し、本発明では、残留γの平均炭素濃度ではなく、個々の残留γの炭素濃度に着目し、炭素濃度が0.8質量%超、1.0質量%以下の残留γを積極的に生成させている点で、従来の技術と大きく相違している。すなわち、残留γの生成量が同じで、残留γの炭素濃度の平均値が同じでも、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γの生成量と炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γの生成量とが異なれば、得られる特性が大きく変化するという知見を本発明者らは見出したのである。 On the other hand, in the present invention, focusing on the carbon concentration of individual residual γ, not the average carbon concentration of residual γ, the residual γ having a carbon concentration of more than 0.8 mass% and 1.0 mass% or less is positive. It is greatly different from the conventional technology in that it is generated in the above. That is, even if the amount of residual γ is the same and the average value of the carbon concentration of the residual γ is the same, the amount of residual γ generated and the carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less The present inventors have found that the characteristics obtained are greatly changed if the amount of γ produced is different.
上記特許文献3についてさらに付言すると、上記特許文献3に開示されている鋼板に含まれる残留γ中の炭素濃度の平均値は非常に低いため、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γの生成量がかなり多いと予想される上に、構成組織も異なる。 Further adding to the above Patent Document 3, since the average value of the carbon concentration in the residual γ contained in the steel sheet disclosed in the above Patent Document 3 is very low, the residual γ having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less. The amount produced is expected to be quite large and the composition is also different.
次に、金属組織全体に対する、残留γの体積率(VγR)、残留γの平均炭素濃度(以下、%Cavgと表記することがある。)、及び残留γの炭素濃度分布の各測定方法について説明する。 Next, each measurement method of the volume ratio of residual γ (Vγ R ), the average carbon concentration of residual γ (hereinafter sometimes referred to as% C avg ), and the carbon concentration distribution of residual γ with respect to the entire metal structure. Will be described.
残留γの体積率及び残留γの平均炭素濃度は、鋼板の1/4の厚さまで研削した後、化学研磨してからX線回折法により測定する。測定原理は、ISIJ Int. Vol.33、1933年、No.7、p.776を参照できる。なお、このX線回折法は、X線回折装置として、株式会社リガク製X線回折装置(RINT-1500)を用い、X線としてCo-Kα線を用いた。 The volume fraction of residual γ and the average carbon concentration of residual γ are measured by X-ray diffraction after grinding to a thickness of ¼ of the steel plate and then chemical polishing. The measurement principle is ISIJ Int. Vol. 33, 1933, no. 7, p. 776 can be referred to. In this X-ray diffraction method, an X-ray diffractometer (RINT-1500) manufactured by Rigaku Corporation was used as the X-ray diffractometer, and Co-Kα rays were used as the X-ray.
残留γの炭素濃度の分布は、上記X線回折装置で測定した(200)γ、(220)γ、及び(311)γの3つの回折ピークを用いて以下のようにして求めた。 The distribution of carbon concentration of residual γ was determined as follows using three diffraction peaks of (200) γ , (220) γ , and (311) γ measured with the above X-ray diffractometer.
まず、図1の模式図に示すように、(200)γ、(220)γ、及び(311)γの3つの回折ピークについて、それぞれ、回折強度が最大となる2θ(2θavg(hkl))とその半価幅Δ2θ(hkl)とを求めた。ここに、(hkl)は、(200)、(220)又は(311)を意味するものとする(以下同じ。)。なお、図1は、X線回折法により測定された残留γの回折ピークを模式的に示す図である。 First, as shown in the schematic diagram of FIG. 1, 2θ (2θ avg (hkl)) at which the diffraction intensity is maximum for each of the three diffraction peaks of (200) γ , (220) γ , and (311) γ. And its half-value width Δ2θ (hkl). Here, (hkl) means (200), (220) or (311) (the same shall apply hereinafter). FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically showing a diffraction peak of residual γ measured by an X-ray diffraction method.
次いで、上記2θavg(hkl)から、ブラッグ条件:λB=2dsinθ(d:格子面間隔、λB:Co-Kα線の波長)を用いて、下記式(1)より、d(hkl)を求めた。
d(hkl)=λB/{2sin(2θavg(hkl)/2)} ・・・(1)
Next, from the above 2θ avg (hkl), using the Bragg condition: λ B = 2 d sin θ (d: lattice spacing, λ B : wavelength of Co—Kα ray), d (hkl) is obtained from the following equation (1). Asked.
d (hkl) = λ B / {2 sin (2θ avg (hkl) / 2)} (1)
そして、下記式(2)により、格子定数a0(hkl)を求め、それら3つの格子定数a0(hkl)を算術平均して格子定数a0を求めた。
a0(hkl)=d(hkl)√(h2+k2+l2) ・・・(2)
Then, the following equation (2), lattice constant a 0 seek (hkl), and their three lattice constants a 0 (hkl) and arithmetic mean of the determined lattice constants a 0.
a 0 (hkl) = d (hkl) √ (h 2 + k 2 + l 2 ) (2)
そして、下記式(3)を用いて炭素濃度%Cavg(単位:質量%)を求めた。
%Cavg=(1/0.033)×(a0-3.572) ・・・(3)
And carbon concentration% Cavg (unit: mass%) was calculated | required using following formula (3).
% C avg = (1 / 0.033) × (a 0 −3.572) (3)
次に、残留γの炭素濃度分布の半価幅Δ%Cを以下の手順で求めた。 Next, the half-value width Δ% C of the carbon concentration distribution of residual γ was determined by the following procedure.
まず、各ピークの回折角度2θ(hkl)の半価幅Δ2θ(hkl)の上下限における回折角度を、下記式(4)及び式(5)で求めた(図1参照)。
2θL(hkl)=2θavg(hkl)-Δ2θ(hkl)/2 ・・・(4)
2θH(hkl)=2θavg(hkl)+Δ2θ(hkl)/2 ・・・(5)
First, the diffraction angles at the upper and lower limits of the half-value width Δ2θ (hkl) of the diffraction angle 2θ (hkl) of each peak were determined by the following formulas (4) and (5) (see FIG. 1).
2θ L (hkl) = 2θ avg (hkl) −Δ2θ (hkl) / 2 (4)
2θ H (hkl) = 2θ avg (hkl) + Δ2θ (hkl) / 2 (5)
そこで、上記2θL(hkl)及び2θH(hkl)をそれぞれ用いて、上記と同様の手順でブラッグ条件及び上記式(1)~式(3)を用いることで、炭素濃度分布の半価幅の上下限値%CL及び%CHを求めた。そして、炭素濃度分布の半価幅Δ%Cを下記式(6)で求めた。
Δ%C=%CH-%CL ・・・(6)
Therefore, by using the above 2θ L (hkl) and 2θ H (hkl) respectively, and using the Bragg condition and the above formulas (1) to (3) in the same procedure as described above, the half width of the carbon concentration distribution is obtained. Upper and lower limit values% C L and% C H were determined. And the half value width (DELTA)% C of carbon concentration distribution was calculated | required by following formula (6).
Δ% C =% C H- % C L (6)
そして、炭素濃度分布が正規分布であると仮定して、以下のようにして、上記半価幅Δ%Cから標準偏差σ%Cを算出した。すなわち、正規分布の確率密度関数f(x)は、平均値uと標準偏差σから、下記式(7)で表される。
f(x)={1/√(2πσ2)}×exp{-(x-u)2/(2σ2)} ・・・(7)
Then, assuming that the carbon concentration distribution is a normal distribution, the standard deviation σ% C was calculated from the half-value width Δ% C as follows. That is, the probability density function f (x) of the normal distribution is expressed by the following formula (7) from the average value u and the standard deviation σ.
f (x) = {1 / √ (2πσ 2 )} × exp {− (x−u) 2 / (2σ 2 )} (7)
平均値における確率f(u)は、上記式(7)にx=uを代入することで下記式(8)にて求まる。
f(u)=1/√(2πσ2) ・・・(8)
The probability f (u) in the average value is obtained by the following formula (8) by substituting x = u into the above formula (7).
f (u) = 1 / √ (2πσ 2 ) (8)
そして、平均値u=%Cavgから半価幅Δ%Cの1/2だけ上下に移動した値(%Cavg±Δ%C/2)での確率密度f(%Cavg±Δ%C/2)は、平均値u=%Cavgでの確率密度f(u)=f(%Cavg)の1/2になるので、上記式(7)及び上記式(8)より、下記式(9)の関係が得られる。
{1/√(2πσ%C2)}×exp{-(Δ%C/2)2/(2σ%C2)}=1/{2√(2πσ%C2)} ・・・(9)
Then, the probability density f (% C avg ± Δ% C) at a value (% C avg ± Δ% C / 2) shifted up and down from the average value u =% C avg by ½ of the half-value width Δ% C / 2) is ½ of the probability density f (u) = f (% C avg ) at the average value u =% C avg , the following equation is obtained from the above equations (7) and (8): The relationship (9) is obtained.
{1 / √ (2πσ% C 2 )} × exp {− (Δ% C / 2) 2 / (2σ% C 2 )} = 1 / {2√ (2πσ% C 2 )} (9)
上記式(9)を変形することで、半価幅Δ%Cから標準偏差σ%Cを求める式として下記式(10)が導出されるので、この式(10)に半価幅Δ%Cを代入することで標準偏差σ%Cを算出した。
σ%C=√{(Δ%C/2)2/(2ln2)} ・・・(10)
By modifying the above equation (9), the following equation (10) is derived as an equation for obtaining the standard deviation σ% C from the half-value width Δ% C. Therefore, the half-value width Δ% C is derived from this equation (10). Was substituted to calculate the standard deviation σ% C.
σ% C = √ {(Δ% C / 2) 2 / (2ln2)} (10)
そして、上記のようにして求めた残留γ中の炭素濃度分布の平均値%Cavgと標準偏差σ%Cとを用いて、下記式(11)に示す累積分布関数g(x)により、金属組織全体に対する、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γの体積率VγR(C≦1.0%)を求める式として下記式(12)を導出し、この式(12)を用いてVγR(C≦1.0%)を算出した。
g(x)=(1/2)×[1+erf{(x-u)/√(2σ2)}] ・・・(11)
VγR(C≦1.0%)=VγR×g(1.0)=VγR×(1/2)×[1+erf{(1.0-%Cavg)/√(2σ%C2)}] ・・・(12)
Then, using the average value% C avg and the standard deviation σ% C of the carbon concentration distribution in the residual γ determined as described above, the cumulative distribution function g (x) shown in the following formula (11) The following equation (12) is derived as an equation for obtaining the volume fraction Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%) of residual γ with a carbon concentration of 1.0 mass% or less with respect to the entire tissue, and this equation (12) is used. Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%) was calculated.
g (x) = (1/2) × [1 + erf {(x−u) / √ (2σ 2 )}] (11)
Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%) = Vγ R × g (1.0) = Vγ R × (1/2) × [1 + erf {(1.0−% C avg ) / √ (2σ% C 2 ) }] (12)
また、上記のようにして求めた残留γ中の炭素濃度分布の平均値%Cavgと標準偏差σ%Cとを用いて、上記式(11)に示す累積分布関数g(x)により、金属組織全体に対する、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γの体積率VγR(C≦0.8%)を求める式として下記式(13)を導出し、この式(13)を用いてVγR(C≦0.8%)を算出した。
VγR(C≦0.8%)=VγR×g(0.8)=VγR×(1/2)×[1+erf{(0.8-%Cavg)/√(2σ%C2)}] ・・・(13)
Further, using the average value% C avg and the standard deviation σ% C of the carbon concentration distribution in the residual γ determined as described above, the cumulative distribution function g (x) shown in the above equation (11) is used to calculate the metal The following equation (13) is derived as an equation for obtaining the volume fraction Vγ R (C ≦ 0.8%) of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 0.8 mass% or less with respect to the entire tissue, and using this equation (13) Vγ R (C ≦ 0.8%) was calculated.
Vγ R (C ≦ 0.8%) = Vγ R × g (0.8) = Vγ R × (1/2) × [1 + erf {(0.8-% C avg) / √ (2σ% C 2) }] (13)
上記式(12)及び式(13)において、VγRは、金属組織全体に対する残留γの合計体積率である。
次に、上記(A)の要件について、説明する。
In the above formula (12) and Formula (13), V.gamma R is the total volume fraction of retained γ to the entire metal structure.
Next, the requirement (A) will be described.
[ポリゴナルフェライト]
ポリゴナルフェライトは、ベイナイトに比べて軟質であり、鋼板の伸びを高めて、室温での加工性を改善するのに作用する組織である。こうした作用を発揮させるには、ポリゴナルフェライトの面積率は、金属組織全体に対して10%以上、好ましくは20%以上、より好ましくは25%以上とする。しかし、ポリゴナルフェライトの生成量が過剰になると、強度が低下するため、ポリゴナルフェライトの面積率は、金属組織全体に対して50%以下、好ましくは45%以下、より好ましくは40%以下とする。
[Polygonal ferrite]
Polygonal ferrite is softer than bainite and is a structure that acts to increase the elongation of the steel sheet and improve the workability at room temperature. In order to exert such an effect, the area ratio of polygonal ferrite is 10% or more, preferably 20% or more, more preferably 25% or more with respect to the entire metal structure. However, since the strength decreases when the amount of polygonal ferrite produced becomes excessive, the area ratio of polygonal ferrite is 50% or less, preferably 45% or less, more preferably 40% or less, based on the entire metal structure. To do.
上記ポリゴナルフェライトの面積率は、走査型電子顕微鏡によって測定できる。 The area ratio of the polygonal ferrite can be measured with a scanning electron microscope.
[ベイナイト]
ベイナイト変態によって生成するベイナイトは、オーステナイトへCを濃化させ、残留γを得るのに有効に作用する組織である。また、ベイナイトは、ポリゴナルフェライトと焼戻しマルテンサイトとの間の強度を有するため、強度と伸びの両方をバランスよく高める組織である。こうした効果を発揮させるために、ベイナイトの面積率は、金属組織全体に対して10%以上、好ましくは15%以上、より好ましくは20%以上とする。しかし、ベイナイトの生成量が過剰になると、強度が低下するため、ベイナイトの面積率は、金属組織全体に対して50%以下、好ましくは40%以下、より好ましくは30%以下とする。
[Bainite]
Bainite generated by the bainite transformation is a structure that effectively acts to concentrate C into austenite and obtain residual γ. Moreover, since bainite has the intensity | strength between polygonal ferrite and tempered martensite, it is a structure | tissue which raises both intensity | strength and elongation with good balance. In order to exhibit such an effect, the area ratio of bainite is 10% or more, preferably 15% or more, more preferably 20% or more with respect to the entire metal structure. However, when the amount of bainite produced becomes excessive, the strength decreases, so that the area ratio of bainite is 50% or less, preferably 40% or less, more preferably 30% or less with respect to the entire metal structure.
上記ベイナイトは、鋼板の断面をナイタール腐食してから走査型電子顕微鏡で観察したときに、残留γ及び炭化物よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種同士の間隔の平均が1μm以上になっている組織であり、炭化物の析出がないベイニティックフェライトの他、炭化物が部分的に析出しているものも含む。 The bainite is a structure in which the average of the interval between at least one selected from the group consisting of residual γ and carbide is 1 μm or more when observed with a scanning electron microscope after the section of the steel sheet is corroded with nital. In addition to bainitic ferrite with no carbide precipitation, it includes those with partial precipitation of carbide.
[焼戻しマルテンサイト]
焼戻しマルテンサイトは、強度と穴拡げ率λとの両方をバランスよく高めるのに作用する組織である。こうした効果を発揮させるために、焼戻しマルテンサイトの面積率は、金属組織全体に対して10%以上、好ましくは15%以上、より好ましくは20%以上とする。しかし、焼戻しマルテンサイトの生成量が過剰になると、残留γの生成量の低下が顕著になり、伸びが低下するため、焼戻しマルテンサイトの面積率は、金属組織全体に対して80%以下、好ましくは70%以下、より好ましくは60%以下とする。
[Tempered martensite]
Tempered martensite is a structure that acts to increase both the strength and the hole expansion ratio λ in a well-balanced manner. In order to exhibit such an effect, the area ratio of tempered martensite is 10% or more, preferably 15% or more, more preferably 20% or more with respect to the entire metal structure. However, if the amount of tempered martensite produced becomes excessive, the amount of residual γ produced decreases significantly, and the elongation decreases. Therefore, the area ratio of tempered martensite is preferably 80% or less of the entire metal structure, preferably Is 70% or less, more preferably 60% or less.
上記焼戻しマルテンサイトとは、鋼板の断面をナイタール腐食した後、走査型電子顕微鏡で観察したときに、残留γ及び炭化物よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種同士の間隔の平均が1μm未満になっている組織である。 The tempered martensite is an average of the interval between at least one selected from the group consisting of residual γ and carbide when less than 1 μm is selected from the group consisting of residual γ and carbide when the steel sheet is subjected to nital corrosion and then observed with a scanning electron microscope. Organization.
ここで、「残留γ及び炭化物よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種の間隔の平均」について説明する。当該平均とは、鋼板の断面をナイタール腐食した後、走査型電子顕微鏡で観察したとき、隣接する残留γ同士の中心位置間距離、隣接する炭化物同士の中心位置間距離、又はある残留γと前記残留γに隣接する炭化物との中心位置間距離を測定した結果を平均した値である。上記中心位置間距離は、各残留γ又は各炭化物の中心位置を求め、最も隣接している残留γ同士、炭化物同士、又は残留γと炭化物とについて測定した中心位置間の距離を意味する。上記中心位置は、残留γ又は炭化物の長径と短径を決定し、長径と短径が交差する位置とする。 Here, the “average of at least one interval selected from the group consisting of residual γ and carbide” will be described. The average is the distance between the center positions of the adjacent residual γ, the distance between the center positions of the adjacent carbides, or the residual γ when the cross section of the steel sheet is subjected to Nital corrosion and observed with a scanning electron microscope. It is a value obtained by averaging the results of measuring the distance between the center positions of the carbides adjacent to the residual γ. The distance between the center positions means the distance between the center positions obtained by obtaining the center positions of each residual γ or each carbide and measuring the most adjacent residual γ, the carbides, or the residual γ and the carbide. The center position determines the major axis and minor axis of residual γ or carbide, and is the position where the major axis and minor axis intersect.
ただし、残留γ又は炭化物がラスの境界上に析出する場合は、複数の残留γと炭化物とが連なって、その形態は針状又は板状になる。この場合、中心位置間距離は、残留γ及び炭化物よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種同士の距離ではなく、図2に示すように、残留γ及び炭化物よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種が長径方向に連なって形成する線11と線11の間隔、すなわち、ラス間距離を中心位置間距離12とする。なお、図2は、残留オーステナイト及び炭化物よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種が連なった形態を説明するための模式図である。
However, when residual γ or carbide precipitates on the boundary of the lath, a plurality of residual γ and carbide are connected to form a needle shape or a plate shape. In this case, the distance between the center positions is not a distance between at least one selected from the group consisting of residual γ and carbide, but at least one type selected from the group consisting of residual γ and carbide as shown in FIG. The distance between the
ベイナイトと焼戻しマルテンサイトの分布状態は、特に限定されず、旧オーステナイト粒内にベイナイトと焼戻しマルテンサイトの両方が生成していてもよいし、旧オーステナイト粒毎にベイナイトと焼戻しマルテンサイトが夫々生成していてもよい。 The distribution state of bainite and tempered martensite is not particularly limited, and both bainite and tempered martensite may be generated in the old austenite grains, and bainite and tempered martensite are generated for each old austenite grain. It may be.
ベイナイトと焼戻しマルテンサイトの分布状態を模式的に図3A及び図3Bに示す。図3Aは、旧オーステナイト粒23内にベイナイト21と焼戻しマルテンサイト22との両方が混合して生成している様子を示し、図3Bは、旧オーステナイト粒23毎にベイナイト21と焼戻しマルテンサイト22とが夫々生成している様子を示す。各図中に示した黒丸24はMA混合相を示している。なお、図3A及び図3Bは、ベイナイトと焼戻しマルテンサイトの分布状態を説明するための模式図である。
The distribution state of bainite and tempered martensite is schematically shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B. FIG. 3A shows a state in which both bainite 21 and tempered
[その他]
前記高強度鋼板の金属組織は、ポリゴナルフェライト、ベイナイト、焼戻しマルテンサイト、及び残留γからなっていてもよいが、本発明の作用を損なわない範囲で、他の組織として、MA混合相、パーライト、又はフレッシュマルテンサイト等の残部組織を有していてもよい。いずれの残部組織も割れ起点となり、室温での加工性を劣化させるため、できるだけ少ない方が好ましい。残部組織は、鋼板の断面をナイタール腐食した後、走査型電子顕微鏡で観察したときに、合計で25面積%以下であることが好ましい。
[Others]
The metal structure of the high-strength steel sheet may be composed of polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite, and residual γ. However, as long as the effects of the present invention are not impaired, other structures include MA mixed phase, pearlite. Or you may have remainder structures, such as fresh martensite. Any remaining structure becomes a starting point of cracking and deteriorates the workability at room temperature, so it is preferable that the remaining structure be as small as possible. The remaining structure is preferably 25 area% or less in total when the cross section of the steel plate is subjected to nital corrosion and then observed with a scanning electron microscope.
なお、ポリゴナルフェライト、ベイナイト、焼戻しマルテンサイトの面積率は、走査型電子顕微鏡で測定しているのに対し、残留γの体積率はX線回折法で測定しており、測定方法が異なるため、これらの組織の面積率と体積率を合計しても100%を超えることがある。 The area ratio of polygonal ferrite, bainite, and tempered martensite is measured with a scanning electron microscope, whereas the volume fraction of residual γ is measured with an X-ray diffraction method, and the measurement method is different. The total area ratio and volume ratio of these tissues may exceed 100%.
次に、本実施形態に係る高強度鋼板の成分組成について説明する。以下、成分組成における%は、質量%を意味する。 Next, the component composition of the high-strength steel sheet according to this embodiment will be described. Hereinafter,% in the component composition means mass%.
上記高強度鋼板は、C:0.10~0.5%、Si:1.0~3%、Mn:1.5~3%、P:0%超、0.1%以下、S:0%超、0.05%以下、Al:0.005~1%、及びN:0%超、0.01%以下を満足する。 The high-strength steel plate has C: 0.10 to 0.5%, Si: 1.0 to 3%, Mn: 1.5 to 3%, P: more than 0%, 0.1% or less, S: 0 %, 0.05% or less, Al: 0.005 to 1%, and N: more than 0%, 0.01% or less.
Cは、鋼板の強度を高める元素であり、また、オーステナイトを安定化させて残留γを確保するためにも必要な元素である。こうした効果を発揮させるためには、C量は、0.10%以上とする。C量は、好ましくは0.13%以上、より好ましくは0.15%以上である。しかし、Cを過剰に含有すると、溶接性が劣化するため、C量は、0.5%以下とする。C量は、好ましくは0.30%以下、より好ましくは0.25%以下である。 C is an element that increases the strength of the steel sheet, and is also an element that is necessary for stabilizing austenite and securing residual γ. In order to exert such an effect, the C amount is 0.10% or more. The amount of C is preferably 0.13% or more, more preferably 0.15% or more. However, if C is contained excessively, weldability deteriorates, so the C content is 0.5% or less. The amount of C is preferably 0.30% or less, more preferably 0.25% or less.
Siは、固溶強化元素であり、鋼板の高強度化に寄与する元素である。また、Siは、炭化物の析出を抑えてオーステナイト中にCを凝縮させて安定化し、残留γを確保するのに重要な元素である。こうした効果を発揮させるためには、Si量は、1.0%以上とする。Si量は、好ましくは1.2%以上、より好ましくは1.3%以上である。しかし、Siを過剰に含有すると、焼鈍での加熱、均熱時に、ポリゴナルフェライトのオーステナイトへの逆変態が起こらず、ポリゴナルフェライトが過剰に残存し、強度不足になる。また、熱間圧延時にスケールが著しく形成されて鋼板表面にスケール跡疵が付き、表面性状を悪化させる。これらのことから、Si量は、3%以下とする。Si量は、好ましくは2.5%以下、より好ましくは2.0%以下である。 Si is a solid solution strengthening element and is an element that contributes to increasing the strength of the steel sheet. Si is an important element for suppressing the precipitation of carbides and condensing and stabilizing C in austenite to secure residual γ. In order to exert such effects, the Si amount is set to 1.0% or more. The Si amount is preferably 1.2% or more, more preferably 1.3% or more. However, if Si is excessively contained, reverse transformation of polygonal ferrite to austenite does not occur during annealing and soaking, and polygonal ferrite remains excessively, resulting in insufficient strength. Moreover, a scale is remarkably formed at the time of hot rolling, and a scale trace is attached to the steel sheet surface, which deteriorates the surface properties. For these reasons, the Si content is 3% or less. The amount of Si is preferably 2.5% or less, more preferably 2.0% or less.
Mnは、焼入性向上元素として作用し、冷却中にポリゴナルフェライトが過剰に生成するのを抑制し、鋼板の強度を高める元素である。また、Mnは、残留γを安定化するのにも寄与する。こうした効果を発揮させるためには、Mn量は、1.5%以上とする。Mn量は、好ましくは1.8%以上、より好ましくは2.0%以上である。しかし、Mnを過剰に含有すると、ベイナイトの生成が著しく抑制され、所望のベイナイト量を確保できず、強度と伸びのバランスが悪くなる。また、鋳片割れが生じるなどの悪影響が生じる。これらのことから、Mn量は3%以下とする。Mn量は、好ましくは2.8%以下、より好ましくは2.7%以下である。 Mn is an element that acts as a hardenability improving element, suppresses excessive formation of polygonal ferrite during cooling, and increases the strength of the steel sheet. Mn also contributes to stabilizing the residual γ. In order to exhibit such an effect, the amount of Mn is 1.5% or more. The amount of Mn is preferably 1.8% or more, more preferably 2.0% or more. However, when Mn is contained excessively, the formation of bainite is remarkably suppressed, the desired amount of bainite cannot be secured, and the balance between strength and elongation is deteriorated. In addition, adverse effects such as slab cracking occur. Therefore, the Mn content is 3% or less. The amount of Mn is preferably 2.8% or less, more preferably 2.7% or less.
Pは、不可避不純物であり、過剰に含有すると粒界偏析による粒界脆化を助長し、室温での加工性が劣化するため、P量は0.1%以下とする。P量は、好ましくは0.08%以下、より好ましくは0.05%以下である。P量は、できるだけ少ない方が好ましいが、通常、0.001%程度含有する。 P is an inevitable impurity, and if contained excessively, it promotes grain boundary embrittlement due to grain boundary segregation and deteriorates workability at room temperature, so the P content is 0.1% or less. The amount of P is preferably 0.08% or less, more preferably 0.05% or less. The amount of P is preferably as small as possible, but is usually about 0.001%.
Sは、不可避不純物であり、過剰に含有するとMnSなどの硫化物系介在物を形成し、割れの起点となって室温での加工性が劣化するため、S量は0.05%以下とする。S量は、好ましくは0.01%以下、より好ましくは0.005%以下である。S量は、できるだけ少ない方が好ましいが、通常、0.0001%程度含有する。 S is an unavoidable impurity, and if it is excessively contained, sulfide inclusions such as MnS are formed and the workability at room temperature deteriorates as a starting point of cracking. Therefore, the S amount is 0.05% or less. . The amount of S is preferably 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less. The amount of S is preferably as small as possible, but is usually about 0.0001%.
Alは、Siと同様、炭化物の析出を抑えて残留γを確保するのに重要な元素である。また、Alは、脱酸材としても作用する元素である。こうした効果を発揮させるためには、Al量は、0.005%以上とする。Al量は、好ましくは0.010%以上、より好ましくは0.03%以上である。しかし、Alを過剰に含有すると鋼板中に介在物が多く析出し、室温での加工性が劣化するため、Al量は1%以下とする。Al量は、好ましくは0.8%以下、より好ましくは0.5%以下である。 Al, like Si, is an important element for securing the residual γ by suppressing the precipitation of carbides. Al is an element that also acts as a deoxidizer. In order to exert such an effect, the Al amount is set to 0.005% or more. The amount of Al is preferably 0.010% or more, more preferably 0.03% or more. However, if Al is contained excessively, a lot of inclusions are precipitated in the steel sheet, and the workability at room temperature deteriorates. Therefore, the Al content is set to 1% or less. The amount of Al is preferably 0.8% or less, more preferably 0.5% or less.
Nは、不可避不純物であり、過剰に含有すると窒化物が多量に析出して割れの起点となり、室温での加工性が劣化するため、N量は0.01%以下とする。N量は、好ましくは0.008%以下、より好ましくは0.005%以下である。N量は、できるだけ少ない方が好ましいが、通常、0.001%程度含有する。 N is an inevitable impurity, and if it is contained in excess, a large amount of nitride precipitates and becomes the starting point of cracking, and the workability at room temperature deteriorates, so the N amount is 0.01% or less. The N amount is preferably 0.008% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less. The amount of N is preferably as small as possible, but is usually about 0.001%.
前記高強度鋼板の基本成分は、上記の通りであり、残部は、鉄及び不可避不純物である。不可避不純物としては、本発明の効果を損なわない範囲で、原料、資材、製造設備等の状況によって持ち込まれる元素の混入が許容される。 The basic components of the high-strength steel plate are as described above, and the balance is iron and inevitable impurities. As an inevitable impurity, mixing of elements brought in depending on the situation of raw materials, materials, manufacturing facilities, etc. is allowed within a range that does not impair the effects of the present invention.
上記高強度鋼板は、更に、他の元素として、下記(a)~(e)に属する少なくとも1種を含有してもよい。また、下記(a)~(e)に属する元素は、単独で含有させてもよいし、下記(a)~(e)に属する元素を複数組み合わせて含有させてもよい。
(a)Cr:0%超、1%以下、及びMo:0%超、1%以下よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種。
(b)Ti:0%超、0.15%以下、Nb:0%超、0.15%以下、及びV:0%超、0.15%以下よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種。
(c)Cu:0%超、1%以下、及びNi:0%超、1%以下よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種。
(d)B:0%超、0.005%以下。
(e)Ca:0%超、0.01%以下、Mg:0%超、0.01%以下、及び希土類元素:0%超、0.01%以下よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種。
The high-strength steel plate may further contain at least one element belonging to the following (a) to (e) as another element. Further, the elements belonging to the following (a) to (e) may be contained alone, or a plurality of elements belonging to the following (a) to (e) may be contained in combination.
(A) At least one selected from the group consisting of Cr: more than 0%, 1% or less, and Mo: more than 0%, 1% or less.
(B) At least one selected from the group consisting of Ti: more than 0%, 0.15% or less, Nb: more than 0%, 0.15% or less, and V: more than 0%, 0.15% or less.
(C) At least one selected from the group consisting of Cu: more than 0%, 1% or less, and Ni: more than 0%, 1% or less.
(D) B: more than 0% and 0.005% or less.
(E) At least one selected from the group consisting of Ca: more than 0%, 0.01% or less, Mg: more than 0%, 0.01% or less, and rare earth elements: more than 0%, 0.01% or less.
(a)Cr及びMoは、冷却中にポリゴナルフェライトが過剰に生成するのを抑制し、強度低下を防止する元素である。こうした効果を有効に発揮させるには、Cr量は、0.02%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.1%以上、さらに好ましくは0.2%以上である。Mo量は、0.02%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.1%以上、さらに好ましくは0.2%以上である。しかし、Cr及びMoを過剰に含有すると、Mnと同様、ベイナイトの生成が著しく抑制され、所望のベイナイト量を確保できず、強度と伸びとのバランスが悪くなることがあるため、Cr量は、1%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.8%以下、さらに好ましくは0.5%以下である。Mo量は、1%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.8%以下、さらに好ましくは0.5%以下である。Cr及びMoは、いずれか一方を含有してもよいし、両方を含有してもよい。 (A) Cr and Mo are elements that suppress the formation of excessive polygonal ferrite during cooling and prevent a decrease in strength. In order to effectively exert such effects, the Cr content is preferably 0.02% or more, more preferably 0.1% or more, and further preferably 0.2% or more. The amount of Mo is preferably 0.02% or more, more preferably 0.1% or more, and further preferably 0.2% or more. However, if Cr and Mo are contained excessively, the generation of bainite is remarkably suppressed as in Mn, the desired amount of bainite cannot be secured, and the balance between strength and elongation may be deteriorated. The content is preferably 1% or less, more preferably 0.8% or less, and still more preferably 0.5% or less. The amount of Mo is preferably 1% or less, more preferably 0.8% or less, and still more preferably 0.5% or less. Cr and Mo may contain either one or both.
(b)Ti、Nb、及びVは、いずれも金属組織を微細化して鋼板の強度と靭性とを向上させるのに作用する元素である。こうした効果を有効に発揮させるには、Ti量は、0.01%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.015%以上、さらに好ましくは0.020%以上である。Nb量は、0.01%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.015%以上、さらに好ましくは0.020%以上である。V量は、0.01%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.015%以上、さらに好ましくは0.020%以上である。しかし、Ti、Nb、及びVを過剰に含有しても効果は飽和する。また、炭化物が粒界に析出し、室温での加工性が劣化することがある。これらのことから、Ti量は、0.15%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.12%以下、さらに好ましくは0.10%以下である。Nb量は、0.15%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.12%以下、さらに好ましくは0.10%以下である。V量は、0.15%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.12%以下、さらに好ましくは0.10%以下である。Ti、Nb、及びVは、いずれか1種を含有してもよいし、任意に選ばれる2種以上を含有してもよい。 (B) Ti, Nb, and V are all elements that act to refine the metal structure and improve the strength and toughness of the steel sheet. In order to effectively exhibit such effects, the Ti content is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.015% or more, and further preferably 0.020% or more. The Nb content is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.015% or more, and further preferably 0.020% or more. The amount of V is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.015% or more, and further preferably 0.020% or more. However, the effect is saturated even if Ti, Nb, and V are contained excessively. In addition, carbides may precipitate at the grain boundaries and workability at room temperature may deteriorate. For these reasons, the Ti content is preferably 0.15% or less, more preferably 0.12% or less, and still more preferably 0.10% or less. The Nb content is preferably 0.15% or less, more preferably 0.12% or less, and still more preferably 0.10% or less. The V amount is preferably 0.15% or less, more preferably 0.12% or less, and still more preferably 0.10% or less. Ti, Nb, and V may contain any 1 type, and may contain 2 or more types chosen arbitrarily.
(c)Cu及びNiは、鋼板の耐食性を向上させるのに作用する元素である。こうした効果を有効に発揮させるには、Cu量は、0.01%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.05%以上、さらに好ましくは0.10%以上である。Ni量は、0.01%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.05%以上、さらに好ましくは0.10%以上である。しかし、Cu及びNiを過剰に含有しても効果は飽和する。また、熱間加工性が劣化することがある。これらのことから、Cu量は、1%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.8%以下、さらに好ましくは0.5%以下である。Ni量は、1%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.8%以下、さらに好ましくは0.5%以下である。Cu及びNiは、いずれか一方を含有してもよいし、両方を含有してもよい。 (C) Cu and Ni are elements that act to improve the corrosion resistance of the steel sheet. In order to exhibit such an effect effectively, the amount of Cu is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.05% or more, and further preferably 0.10% or more. The amount of Ni is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably 0.05% or more, and further preferably 0.10% or more. However, the effect is saturated even if Cu and Ni are contained excessively. Moreover, hot workability may deteriorate. For these reasons, the Cu content is preferably 1% or less, more preferably 0.8% or less, and still more preferably 0.5% or less. The amount of Ni is preferably 1% or less, more preferably 0.8% or less, and still more preferably 0.5% or less. Cu and Ni may contain either one or both.
(d)Bは、Cr及びMnと同様、冷却中にポリゴナルフェライトが過剰に生成するのを抑制し、強度低下を防止する元素である。こうした効果を有効に発揮させるには、B量は、0.0001%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.0005%以上、さらに好ましくは0.0010%以上である。しかし、Bを過剰に含有すると、Cr及びMnと同様、ベイナイトの生成が著しく抑制され、所望のベイナイト量を確保できず、強度と伸びとのバランスが悪くなることがある。これらのことから、B量は、0.005%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.004%以下、さらに好ましくは0.003%以下である。 (D) B, like Cr and Mn, is an element that suppresses excessive formation of polygonal ferrite during cooling and prevents a decrease in strength. In order to effectively exert such effects, the B content is preferably 0.0001% or more, more preferably 0.0005% or more, and further preferably 0.0010% or more. However, when B is contained excessively, the formation of bainite is remarkably suppressed like Cr and Mn, the desired amount of bainite cannot be secured, and the balance between strength and elongation may be deteriorated. For these reasons, the B content is preferably 0.005% or less, more preferably 0.004% or less, and still more preferably 0.003% or less.
(e)Ca、Mg、及び希土類元素(Rare Earth Metal;REM)は、いずれも鋼板中の介在物を微細分散させる作用を有する元素である。こうした効果を有効に発揮させるには、Ca量は、0.0001%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.0005%以上、さらに好ましくは0.0010%以上である。Mg量は、0.0001%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.0005%以上、さらに好ましくは0.0010%以上である。希土類元素量は、0.0001%以上が好ましく、より好ましくは0.0005%以上、さらに好ましくは0.0010%以上である。しかし、Ca、Mg、及び希土類元素を過剰に含有すると、鍛造性や熱間加工性が悪くなることがある。このことから、Ca量は、0.01%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.005%以下、さらに好ましくは0.003%以下である。Mg量は、0.01%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.005%以下、さらに好ましくは0.003%以下である。希土類元素量は、0.01%以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは0.005%以下、さらに好ましくは0.003%以下である。Ca、Mg、及び希土類元素は、いずれか1種を含有してもよいし、任意に選ばれる2種以上を含有してもよい。 (E) Ca, Mg, and rare earth elements (Rare Earth Metal; REM) are all elements that have the effect of finely dispersing inclusions in the steel sheet. In order to effectively exert such effects, the Ca content is preferably 0.0001% or more, more preferably 0.0005% or more, and further preferably 0.0010% or more. The amount of Mg is preferably 0.0001% or more, more preferably 0.0005% or more, and still more preferably 0.0010% or more. The amount of rare earth elements is preferably 0.0001% or more, more preferably 0.0005% or more, and still more preferably 0.0010% or more. However, when Ca, Mg, and rare earth elements are contained excessively, forgeability and hot workability may deteriorate. Therefore, the Ca content is preferably 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less, and still more preferably 0.003% or less. The Mg content is preferably 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less, and still more preferably 0.003% or less. The rare earth element content is preferably 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.005% or less, and still more preferably 0.003% or less. Ca, Mg, and rare earth elements may contain any 1 type, and may contain 2 or more types chosen arbitrarily.
なお、前記高強度鋼板において、希土類元素とは、ランタノイド元素(LaからLuまでの15元素)、及びSc(スカンジウム)とY(イットリウム)とを含む意味である。 In the high-strength steel sheet, the rare earth element means a lanthanoid element (15 elements from La to Lu), Sc (scandium), and Y (yttrium).
上記高強度鋼板の表面には、電気亜鉛めっき(EG:Electro-Galvanized)層、溶融亜鉛めっき(GI:Hot Dip Galvanized)層、又は合金化溶融亜鉛めっき(GA:Hot Dip Galvannealed)層を有していてもよい。すなわち、本発明には、高強度電気亜鉛めっき鋼板、高強度溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板、高強度合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板も包含される。 The surface of the high-strength steel sheet has an electrogalvanized (EG) layer, a hot dip galvanized (GI) layer, or an alloyed hot dip galvanized (GA) layer. It may be. That is, the present invention includes high-strength electrogalvanized steel sheets, high-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheets, and high-strength galvannealed steel sheets.
次に、本実施形態に係る高強度鋼板の製造方法について、図4を用いて説明する。図4は、前記高強度鋼板を製造するときの焼鈍パターンを示した模式図であり、横軸は時間(秒)、縦軸は温度(℃)を意味する。 Next, a method for manufacturing a high-strength steel sheet according to this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing an annealing pattern when manufacturing the high-strength steel sheet, where the horizontal axis represents time (seconds) and the vertical axis represents temperature (° C.).
[均熱工程]
まず、上記成分組成を満足する鋼板を800℃以上、Ac3点以下のT1温度域に加熱し、該T1温度域で40秒間以上保持して均熱する(均熱工程)。上記鋼板は、熱延鋼板であってもよいし、冷延鋼板であってもよい。なお、T1温度域での均熱温度を、以下「T1」と表記し、該T1温度域での均熱時間を、以下「t1」と表記することがある。また、保持には、恒温保持のほか、該T1温度域内で温度変動する態様も含まれる。
[Soaking process]
First, a steel sheet satisfying the above component composition is heated to a T1 temperature range of 800 ° C. or more and Ac 3 points or less, and held in the T1 temperature range for 40 seconds or more and soaked (soaking step). The steel plate may be a hot-rolled steel plate or a cold-rolled steel plate. In addition, the soaking temperature in the T1 temperature region is hereinafter referred to as “T1”, and the soaking time in the T1 temperature region is hereinafter referred to as “t1”. The holding includes not only constant temperature holding but also a mode in which the temperature fluctuates within the T1 temperature range.
ポリゴナルフェライトとオーステナイトの二相温度域で均熱することによって、所定量のポリゴナルフェライトを生成させることができる。上記T1温度域における均熱温度T1が低すぎると、ポリゴナルフェライトが過剰に生成し、強度が低下する。また、均熱温度T1が低すぎると、冷間圧延時に生成した展伸組織が残存し、伸びが低下するため、室温での加工性を改善できない。したがって、前記均熱温度T1は、800℃以上とする。上記均熱温度T1は、好ましくは810℃以上、より好ましくは820℃以上である。しかし、均熱温度T1が高すぎると、オーステナイト単相域となり、ポリゴナルフェライトの生成量が不足するため、伸びが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できない。したがって、前記均熱温度T1は、Ac3点以下とする。均熱温度T1は、好ましくはAc3点-10℃以下、より好ましくはAc3点-20℃以下である。 By soaking in the two-phase temperature range of polygonal ferrite and austenite, a predetermined amount of polygonal ferrite can be generated. If the soaking temperature T1 in the T1 temperature range is too low, polygonal ferrite is excessively generated and the strength is lowered. On the other hand, if the soaking temperature T1 is too low, the stretched structure generated during cold rolling remains and the elongation decreases, so that the workability at room temperature cannot be improved. Therefore, the soaking temperature T1 is set to 800 ° C. or higher. The soaking temperature T1 is preferably 810 ° C. or higher, more preferably 820 ° C. or higher. However, if the soaking temperature T1 is too high, it becomes an austenite single phase region, and the amount of polygonal ferrite produced is insufficient, so that the elongation decreases and the workability at room temperature cannot be improved. Therefore, the soaking temperature T1 is set to Ac 3 points or less. The soaking temperature T1 is preferably Ac 3 point −10 ° C. or lower, more preferably Ac 3 point −20 ° C. or lower.
上記T1温度域での均熱時間t1が短すぎると、鋼板を均一に加熱できないため、炭化物が未固溶のまま残存して残留γの生成が抑制される。その結果、伸びが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できない。したがって、前記均熱時間t1は、40秒間以上とする。均熱時間t1は、好ましくは50秒間以上、より好ましくは80秒間以上である。均熱時間t1の上限は、特に限定されないが、均熱時間t1が長過ぎると、生産性が悪くなる。したがって、均熱時間t1は、500秒間以下とすることが好ましく、より好ましくは450秒間以下である。 If the soaking time t1 in the T1 temperature range is too short, the steel sheet cannot be heated uniformly, so that the carbide remains undissolved and the formation of residual γ is suppressed. As a result, the elongation decreases and the processability at room temperature cannot be improved. Therefore, the soaking time t1 is set to 40 seconds or more. The soaking time t1 is preferably 50 seconds or longer, more preferably 80 seconds or longer. Although the upper limit of soaking time t1 is not specifically limited, If soaking time t1 is too long, productivity will worsen. Therefore, the soaking time t1 is preferably 500 seconds or less, and more preferably 450 seconds or less.
上記鋼板のAc3点の温度は、「レスリー鉄鋼材料科学」(丸善株式会社発行、William C. Leslie著、1985年5月31日発行、p.273)に記載されている下記式(II)から算出できる。下記式(II)中、[ ]は各元素の含有量(質量%)を示しており、鋼板に含まれない元素の含有量は0質量%として計算すればよい。
Ac3点(℃)=910-203×[C]1/2+44.7×[Si]-30×[Mn]-11×[Cr]+31.5×[Mo]-20×[Cu]-15.2×[Ni]+400×[Ti]+104×[V]+700×[P]+400×[Al] ・・・(II)
The temperature of Ac 3 point of the steel sheet is represented by the following formula (II) described in “Leslie Steel Material Science” (published by Maruzen Co., Ltd., William C. Leslie, published May 31, 1985, p.273). It can be calculated from In the following formula (II), [] indicates the content (% by mass) of each element, and the content of elements not included in the steel sheet may be calculated as 0% by mass.
Ac 3 points (° C.) = 910−203 × [C] 1/2 + 44.7 × [Si] −30 × [Mn] −11 × [Cr] + 31.5 × [Mo] −20 × [Cu] − 15.2 × [Ni] + 400 × [Ti] + 104 × [V] + 700 × [P] + 400 × [Al] (II)
[第一冷却工程]
上記均熱後は、下記式(I)で表されるMs点が350℃以上の場合は、350℃以下、100℃以上を満たす任意の冷却停止温度T2まで、又は、下記式(I)で表されるMs点が350℃未満の場合は、Ms点以下、100℃以上を満たす任意の冷却停止温度T2まで冷却する(第一冷却工程)。そして、前記第一冷却工程では、700℃から、300℃又は前記冷却停止温度T2のうちの高い方の温度までを平均冷却速度5℃/秒以上で冷却する。
[First cooling step]
After the soaking, when the Ms point represented by the following formula (I) is 350 ° C. or higher, up to an arbitrary cooling stop temperature T2 satisfying 350 ° C. or lower and 100 ° C. or higher, or by the following formula (I) When the represented Ms point is lower than 350 ° C., it is cooled to an arbitrary cooling stop temperature T2 that satisfies the Ms point or lower and 100 ° C. or higher (first cooling step). In the first cooling step, cooling is performed from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C. or the higher one of the cooling stop temperatures T2 at an average cooling rate of 5 ° C./second or more.
均熱後、700℃から、300℃又は前記冷却停止温度T2のうちの高い方の温度までの区間における平均冷却速度(以下、CR1と表記することがある。)を制御することによって、軟質なポリゴナルフェライトを所定量生成させることができる。すなわち、上記区間における平均冷却速度CR1が5℃/秒を下回ると、ポリゴナルフェライトが過剰に生成し、強度が低下する。したがって、上記区間における平均冷却速度CR1は、5℃/秒以上に制御する必要があり、好ましくは10℃/秒以上、より好ましくは15℃/秒以上である。上記区間における平均冷却速度CR1の上限は、特に限定されないが、平均冷却速度CR1が大きくなりすぎると、温度制御が困難となる。したがって、上記区間における平均冷却速度CR1は、好ましくは80℃/秒以下、より好ましくは60℃/秒以下である。 By controlling the average cooling rate in the section from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C. or the higher one of the cooling stop temperatures T2 after soaking (hereinafter sometimes referred to as CR1), A predetermined amount of polygonal ferrite can be generated. That is, when the average cooling rate CR1 in the section is less than 5 ° C./second, polygonal ferrite is excessively generated and the strength is lowered. Therefore, the average cooling rate CR1 in the above section needs to be controlled to 5 ° C./second or more, preferably 10 ° C./second or more, more preferably 15 ° C./second or more. The upper limit of the average cooling rate CR1 in the above section is not particularly limited, but if the average cooling rate CR1 becomes too large, temperature control becomes difficult. Therefore, the average cooling rate CR1 in the above section is preferably 80 ° C./second or less, more preferably 60 ° C./second or less.
上記冷却停止温度T2は、100~350℃とする。ただし、下記式(I)で算出されるMs点が350℃未満の場合は、上記冷却停止温度T2は、100℃~Ms点とする。 The cooling stop temperature T2 is 100 to 350 ° C. However, when the Ms point calculated by the following formula (I) is less than 350 ° C., the cooling stop temperature T2 is set to 100 ° C. to Ms point.
冷却停止温度T2が低すぎると、焼戻しマルテンサイトが過剰に生成し、残留γ量が少なくなるため、伸びが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できない。また、冷却停止温度T2が低すぎると、炭素濃度が1.0質量%を超える残留γが多く生成し、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γ量が相対的に少なくなり、ΔTSが低下し、温間での成形荷重を室温での成形荷重に比べて充分に低減できない。炭素濃度が1.0質量%を超える残留γが多く生成するのは、焼戻しマルテンサイト内のラス間にフィルム状の残留γが残存し、この残留γの炭素濃度が高いためと考えられる。したがって、上記冷却停止温度T2は、100℃以上とする。上記冷却停止温度T2は、好ましくは110℃以上、より好ましくは120℃以上である。しかし、冷却停止温度T2が高すぎると、焼戻しマルテンサイトの生成量が少なくなるため、その後のベイナイト変態が進みにくくなり、オーステナイトへのC濃化が進みにくくなる。その結果、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γが多くなり、穴拡げ率λが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できない。したがって、上記Ms点が350℃以上の場合は、上記冷却停止温度T2は、350℃以下とする。上記冷却停止温度T2は、好ましくは330℃以下、より好ましくは300℃以下である。一方、上記Ms点が350℃未満の場合は、上記冷却停止温度T2は、Ms点以下とする。上記冷却停止温度T2は、好ましくはMs点-20℃以下、より好ましくはMs点-50℃以下である。 If the cooling stop temperature T2 is too low, tempered martensite is excessively generated and the amount of residual γ is reduced, so that elongation is lowered and workability at room temperature cannot be improved. On the other hand, if the cooling stop temperature T2 is too low, a large amount of residual γ with a carbon concentration exceeding 1.0% by mass is generated, the amount of residual γ with a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less is relatively small, and ΔTS is The warm forming load cannot be sufficiently reduced compared with the forming load at room temperature. The reason why a large amount of residual γ with a carbon concentration exceeding 1.0% by mass is generated is that film-like residual γ remains between the laths in the tempered martensite, and the carbon concentration of the residual γ is high. Therefore, the cooling stop temperature T2 is set to 100 ° C. or higher. The cooling stop temperature T2 is preferably 110 ° C. or higher, more preferably 120 ° C. or higher. However, if the cooling stop temperature T2 is too high, the amount of tempered martensite generated is reduced, so that the subsequent bainite transformation is difficult to proceed and the C enrichment to austenite is difficult to proceed. As a result, the residual γ with a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less increases, the hole expansion rate λ decreases, and the processability at room temperature cannot be improved. Therefore, when the Ms point is 350 ° C. or higher, the cooling stop temperature T2 is set to 350 ° C. or lower. The cooling stop temperature T2 is preferably 330 ° C. or lower, more preferably 300 ° C. or lower. On the other hand, when the Ms point is lower than 350 ° C., the cooling stop temperature T2 is set to be equal to or lower than the Ms point. The cooling stop temperature T2 is preferably Ms point −20 ° C. or lower, more preferably Ms point −50 ° C. or lower.
前記Ms点の温度は、上記「レスリー鉄鋼材料科学」(p.231)に記載されている式に、ポリゴナルフェライト分率(Vf)を考慮した下記式(I)から算出できる。下記式(I)中、[ ]は、各元素の含有量(質量%)を示しており、鋼板に含まれない元素の含有量は0質量%として計算すればよい。Vfは、ポリゴナルフェライト分率(面積%)を表すが、製造中にポリゴナルフェライト分率を直接測定することは困難なため、別途、上記高強度鋼板の製造条件と同じ条件で上記均熱工程を行った後、上記第一冷却工程における上記高強度鋼板の製造条件と同じ平均冷却速度で室温まで冷却して得られたサンプル中のポリゴナルフェライト分率をVfとすればよい。
Ms点(℃)=561-474×[C]/(1-Vf/100)-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo] ・・・(I)
The temperature of the Ms point can be calculated from the following formula (I) in consideration of the polygonal ferrite fraction (Vf) in the formula described in the “Leslie Steel Material Science” (p. 231). In the following formula (I), [] indicates the content (mass%) of each element, and the content of elements not included in the steel sheet may be calculated as 0 mass%. Vf represents the polygonal ferrite fraction (area%), but since it is difficult to directly measure the polygonal ferrite fraction during production, the soaking is performed separately under the same conditions as the production conditions for the high-strength steel sheet. After performing the step, the polygonal ferrite fraction in the sample obtained by cooling to room temperature at the same average cooling rate as the production conditions of the high-strength steel plate in the first cooling step may be Vf.
Ms point (° C.) = 561−474 × [C] / (1−Vf / 100) −33 × [Mn] −17 × [Ni] −17 × [Cr] −21 × [Mo] (I )
[再加熱工程]
上記冷却停止温度T2まで冷却した後は、350℃超、540℃以下のT3温度域に再加熱し、該T3温度域で50秒間以上保持する(再加熱工程)。なお、T3温度域における再加熱温度を、以下「T3」と表記し、該T3温度域での保持時間を以下「t3」と表記することがある。また、保持には、恒温保持のほか、該T3温度域内で温度変動する態様も含まれる。
[Reheating process]
After cooling to the above cooling stop temperature T2, it is reheated to a T3 temperature range of more than 350 ° C. and 540 ° C. or less, and held at the T3 temperature range for 50 seconds or longer (reheating step). In addition, the reheating temperature in the T3 temperature range is hereinafter referred to as “T3”, and the holding time in the T3 temperature range is hereinafter referred to as “t3”. The holding includes not only constant temperature holding but also a mode in which the temperature fluctuates within the T3 temperature range.
上記T3温度域で50秒間以上保持することによって、炭素濃度が0.8質量%超、1.0質量%以下の残留γを生成させることができるため、室温での加工性が良好なまま、温間での成形荷重を低減した高強度鋼板を実現できる。 By holding for 50 seconds or more in the T3 temperature range, it is possible to generate residual γ having a carbon concentration of more than 0.8% by mass and 1.0% by mass or less, so that the workability at room temperature remains good. A high-strength steel sheet with reduced warm load can be realized.
再加熱温度T3が低すぎると、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γの生成量が少なくなり、ΔTSが低下するため、温間での成形荷重を低減できない。したがって、再加熱温度T3は、350℃超とする。再加熱温度T3は、好ましくは360℃以上、より好ましくは370℃以上である。しかし、再加熱温度T3が高すぎると、ベイナイト変態が充分に進まず、残留γ量が減少し、伸びELが低下する。また、残留γのうち、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γ量が多くなり、穴拡げ率λが低下する。その結果、室温での加工性を改善できない。したがって、再加熱温度T3は、540℃以下とする。再加熱温度T3は、好ましくは520℃以下、より好ましくは500℃以下である。 If the reheating temperature T3 is too low, the amount of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less is reduced and ΔTS is lowered, so that the molding load during warming cannot be reduced. Therefore, the reheating temperature T3 is over 350 ° C. The reheating temperature T3 is preferably 360 ° C. or higher, more preferably 370 ° C. or higher. However, if the reheating temperature T3 is too high, the bainite transformation does not proceed sufficiently, the amount of residual γ decreases, and the elongation EL decreases. Further, among the residual γ, the amount of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less increases, and the hole expansion rate λ decreases. As a result, the processability at room temperature cannot be improved. Therefore, the reheating temperature T3 is set to 540 ° C. or lower. The reheating temperature T3 is preferably 520 ° C. or lower, more preferably 500 ° C. or lower.
また、保持時間t3が短すぎると、ベイナイト変態が充分に進行しないため、オーステナイトへのC濃化が充分に進まず、残留γの生成量が減少する。その結果、伸びELが低下する。また、各オーステナイトへのCの濃化度合いにバラツキが生じ、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γ量が多くなり、穴拡げ率λが低下する。その結果、室温での加工性が劣化する。したがって、保持時間t3は50秒間以上とする。保持時間t3は、好ましくは80秒間以上、より好ましくは100秒間以上である。保持時間t3の上限は、特に限定されないが、生産性を考慮すると、例えば、20分間以下が好ましい。 Also, if the holding time t3 is too short, the bainite transformation does not proceed sufficiently, so that C concentration to austenite does not proceed sufficiently and the amount of residual γ produced decreases. As a result, the elongation EL decreases. In addition, the concentration of C in each austenite varies, the amount of residual γ with a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less increases, and the hole expansion ratio λ decreases. As a result, processability at room temperature deteriorates. Accordingly, the holding time t3 is set to 50 seconds or longer. The holding time t3 is preferably 80 seconds or longer, more preferably 100 seconds or longer. The upper limit of the holding time t3 is not particularly limited, but in consideration of productivity, for example, 20 minutes or less is preferable.
[第二冷却工程]
上記再加熱工程で保持した後、前記T3温度域から300℃までは、平均冷却速度10℃/秒以上で冷却し、300℃から150℃までは、平均冷却速度0℃/秒超、10℃/秒未満で冷却する(第二冷却工程)。上記保持後、前記T3温度域から150℃まで冷却するにあたり、300℃を境として二段階冷却することが重要であり、300℃までの高温側は、急冷することにより、ΔTSを大きくできるため、温間での成形荷重を低減でき、300℃からの低温側は、徐冷することにより、穴拡げ率λを大きくできるため、室温での加工性を改善できる。
[Second cooling step]
After holding in the reheating step, cooling is performed at an average cooling rate of 10 ° C./second or more from the T3 temperature range to 300 ° C., and from 300 ° C. to 150 ° C., an average cooling rate of more than 0 ° C./second, 10 ° C. Cool in less than 1 second (second cooling step). After the above holding, when cooling from the T3 temperature range to 150 ° C., it is important to perform two-stage cooling with 300 ° C. as the boundary, and the high temperature side up to 300 ° C. can increase ΔTS by rapid cooling, The molding load during warming can be reduced. On the low temperature side from 300 ° C., the hole expansion ratio λ can be increased by slow cooling, so that the workability at room temperature can be improved.
すなわち、再加熱後、300℃までの平均冷却速度(以下、CR2と表記することがある。)が小さすぎると、冷却中にベイナイト変態及び未変態オーステナイトへのCの濃化が進行し、炭素濃度が1.0質量%を超える残留γ量が多くなる一方で、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γ量が減少する。その結果、ΔTSが低下し、温間での成形荷重を低減できない。したがって、上記平均冷却速度CR2は、10℃/秒以上に制御する必要があり、好ましくは15℃/秒以上、より好ましくは20℃/秒以上である。上記平均冷却速度CR2の上限は、特に限定されないが、平均冷却速度CR2が大きくなりすぎると、温度制御が困難となる。したがって、上記平均冷却速度CR2は、好ましくは80℃/秒以下、より好ましくは60℃/秒以下である。 That is, if the average cooling rate up to 300 ° C. (hereinafter, sometimes referred to as CR2) is too small after reheating, the concentration of C into bainite transformed and untransformed austenite proceeds during cooling, and carbon While the amount of residual γ exceeding 1.0% by mass increases, the amount of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less decreases. As a result, ΔTS decreases, and the molding load during warming cannot be reduced. Therefore, it is necessary to control the average cooling rate CR2 to 10 ° C./second or more, preferably 15 ° C./second or more, more preferably 20 ° C./second or more. The upper limit of the average cooling rate CR2 is not particularly limited, but if the average cooling rate CR2 becomes too large, temperature control becomes difficult. Therefore, the average cooling rate CR2 is preferably 80 ° C./second or less, more preferably 60 ° C./second or less.
一方、300℃から150℃までの冷却中にベイナイト変態は進行しないが、Cの拡散は進行する。そこで、この温度域の平均冷却速度(以下、CR3と表記することがある。)を小さくすることによって、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γの生成量を低減できる。この理由は不明であるが、各残留γに生じるC濃度のバラツキの中で、本来のC濃度よりも低い残留γへCが冷却中に拡散するため、炭素濃度の低い残留γの生成量を低減できると考えられる。Cの供給源は、焼戻しマルテンサイト等と考えられる。また、不可避的にγから変態したフレッシュマルテンサイト(FM)は、冷却中に自己焼戻しが進行する。その結果、穴拡げ率λが大きくなり、室温での加工性が向上する。したがって、上記区間における平均冷却速度CR3は、10℃/秒未満に制御する必要があり、好ましくは5℃/秒以下、より好ましくは2℃/秒以下である。 On the other hand, bainite transformation does not proceed during cooling from 300 ° C. to 150 ° C., but C diffusion proceeds. Thus, by reducing the average cooling rate in this temperature range (hereinafter sometimes referred to as CR3), the amount of residual γ with a carbon concentration of 0.8 mass% or less can be reduced. The reason for this is unknown, but among the variations in the C concentration that occurs in each residual γ, C diffuses during cooling to the residual γ that is lower than the original C concentration. It can be reduced. The source of C is considered to be tempered martensite. In addition, fresh martensite (FM) inevitably transformed from γ undergoes self-tempering during cooling. As a result, the hole expansion rate λ is increased and the processability at room temperature is improved. Therefore, the average cooling rate CR3 in the above section needs to be controlled to less than 10 ° C./second, preferably 5 ° C./second or less, more preferably 2 ° C./second or less.
150℃まで冷却した後は、常法に従って室温まで冷却すればよい。 After cooling to 150 ° C., it may be cooled to room temperature according to a conventional method.
[めっき]
上記高強度鋼板の表面には、電気亜鉛めっき層、溶融亜鉛めっき層、又は合金化溶融亜鉛めっき層を形成してもよい。
[Plating]
An electrogalvanized layer, a hot-dip galvanized layer, or an alloyed hot-dip galvanized layer may be formed on the surface of the high-strength steel plate.
電気亜鉛めっき層、溶融亜鉛めっき層、又は合金化溶融亜鉛めっき層の形成条件は、特に限定されず、常法の電気亜鉛めっき(EG)処理、溶融亜鉛めっき(GI)処理、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき(GA)処理を採用できる。これにより、電気亜鉛めっき鋼板(以下、「EG鋼板」ということがある)、溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板(以下、「GI鋼板」ということがある)、及び合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板(以下、「GA鋼板」ということがある)が得られる。 The conditions for forming the electrogalvanized layer, hot dip galvanized layer, or alloyed hot dip galvanized layer are not particularly limited, and conventional electrogalvanized (EG) treatment, hot dip galvanized (GI) treatment, galvannealed alloyed zinc Plating (GA) treatment can be employed. Accordingly, an electrogalvanized steel sheet (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “EG steel sheet”), a hot dip galvanized steel sheet (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “GI steel sheet”), and an alloyed hot dip galvanized steel sheet (hereinafter referred to as “GA steel sheet”). Is sometimes obtained).
EG鋼板を製造する方法としては、上記鋼板を上記第二冷却工程後、例えば、55℃の亜鉛溶液に浸漬しつつ通電し、電気亜鉛めっき処理を行うことが挙げられる。 As a method for producing an EG steel sheet, after the second cooling step, the steel sheet is energized while being immersed in a zinc solution at 55 ° C., for example, and electrogalvanizing is performed.
GI鋼板を製造する方法としては、上記再加熱工程で溶融亜鉛めっき処理を兼ねればよい。即ち、上記T3温度域に再加熱した後、該T3温度域の温度に調整されためっき浴に浸漬させて溶融亜鉛めっきを施して、溶融亜鉛めっきとT3温度域における保持とを兼ねてもよい。このとき、上記T3温度域での滞在時間が、上記保持時間t3の要件を満足すればよい。 As a method for producing a GI steel sheet, the above reheating process may serve as a hot dip galvanizing process. That is, after reheating to the T3 temperature range, the hot dip galvanization may be performed by immersing in a plating bath adjusted to the temperature of the T3 temperature range to serve as both hot dip galvanization and holding in the T3 temperature range. . At this time, the residence time in the T3 temperature region may satisfy the requirement for the holding time t3.
GA鋼板を製造する方法としては、上記T3温度域の温度で溶融亜鉛めっき後、該T3温度域内で引き続いて合金化処理を施せばよい。このとき、上記T3温度域での滞在時間が、上記保持時間t3の要件を満足すればよい。 As a method for producing a GA steel sheet, after galvanizing at a temperature in the T3 temperature range, an alloying treatment may be subsequently performed in the T3 temperature range. At this time, the residence time in the T3 temperature region may satisfy the requirement for the holding time t3.
亜鉛めっき付着量は特に限定されず、例えば、片面あたり10~100g/m2程度とすることが挙げられる。 The amount of galvanized adhesion is not particularly limited, and for example, it may be about 10 to 100 g / m 2 per side.
前記高強度鋼板の板厚は、特に限定されないが、例えば、板厚が3mm以下の薄鋼板であってもよい。 The plate thickness of the high-strength steel plate is not particularly limited, but may be a thin steel plate having a plate thickness of 3 mm or less, for example.
前記高強度鋼板は、引張強度(TS)が980MPa以上であり、1100MPa以上であることが好ましい。 The tensile strength (TS) of the high-strength steel plate is 980 MPa or more, and preferably 1100 MPa or more.
また、前記高強度鋼板は、室温での加工性(TS×EL、λ)に優れている。具体的には、前記高強度鋼板は、TS×伸び(EL)が、16000MPa・%以上であることが好ましく、18000MPa・%以上であることがより好ましい。また、前記高強度鋼板は、穴拡げ率λが、20%以上であることが好ましく、25%以上であることがより好ましい。 Also, the high-strength steel plate is excellent in workability at room temperature (TS × EL, λ). Specifically, the high-strength steel plate preferably has a TS × elongation (EL) of 16000 MPa ·% or more, and more preferably 18000 MPa ·% or more. The high-strength steel sheet preferably has a hole expansion rate λ of 20% or more, and more preferably 25% or more.
また、前記高強度鋼板は、上述したように、室温での加工性(TS×EL、λ)に優れ、しかも、温間での成形荷重が充分に低減されている。具体的には、前記高強度鋼板は、ΔTSが、150MPa以上であることが好ましく、180MPa以上であることがより好ましい。この温間加工とは、100~350℃程度の温度で成形することを意味する。 Further, as described above, the high-strength steel sheet is excellent in workability at room temperature (TS × EL, λ), and the forming load during warming is sufficiently reduced. Specifically, the high-strength steel sheet preferably has a ΔTS of 150 MPa or more, and more preferably 180 MPa or more. This warm processing means forming at a temperature of about 100 to 350 ° C.
上記高強度鋼板は、自動車の構造部品の素材として好適に用いられる。自動車の構造部品としては、例えば、フロントやリア部のサイドメンバやクラッシュボックスなどの正突部品をはじめ、ピラー類などの補強材(例えば、ベア、センターピラーリインフォースなど)、ルーフレールの補強材、サイドシル、フロアメンバー、キック部などの車体構成部品、バンパーの補強材やドアインパクトビームなどの耐衝撃吸収部品、シート部品などが挙げられる。 The above-mentioned high-strength steel sheet is suitably used as a material for structural parts of automobiles. Structural parts of automobiles include, for example, front and rear side members and crashing parts such as crash boxes, pillars and other reinforcements (for example, bears, center pillar reinforcements, etc.), roof rail reinforcements, side sills , Body components such as floor members and kick sections, shock-absorbing parts such as bumper reinforcements and door impact beams, and seat parts.
本明細書は、上述したように、様々な態様の技術を開示しているが、そのうち主な技術を以下に纏める。 This specification discloses various modes of technology as described above, and the main technologies are summarized below.
本発明の一局面は、質量%で、C:0.10~0.5%、Si:1.0~3%、Mn:1.5~3%、P:0%超、0.1%以下、S:0%超、0.05%以下、Al:0.005~1%、及びN:0%超、0.01%以下を満足し、残部が鉄及び不可避不純物からなる鋼板であり、(1)該鋼板の金属組織は、ポリゴナルフェライト、ベイナイト、焼戻しマルテンサイト、及び残留オーステナイトを含み、(2)前記金属組織を走査型電子顕微鏡で観察したときに、金属組織全体に対して、ポリゴナルフェライト:10~50面積%、ベイナイト :10~50面積%、焼戻しマルテンサイト:10~80面積%を満足し、(3)前記金属組織をX線回折法で測定したときに、金属組織全体に対して、残留オーステナイト:5.0体積%以上、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留オーステナイト:3.5体積%以上、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留オーステナイト:2.4体積%以下を満足することを特徴とする高強度鋼板である。 One aspect of the present invention is, in mass%, C: 0.10 to 0.5%, Si: 1.0 to 3%, Mn: 1.5 to 3%, P: more than 0%, 0.1% Hereinafter, S: more than 0%, 0.05% or less, Al: 0.005 to 1%, and N: more than 0%, 0.01% or less, with the balance being iron and inevitable impurities. (1) The metal structure of the steel sheet includes polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite. (2) When the metal structure is observed with a scanning electron microscope, Polygonal ferrite: 10 to 50 area%, bainite glaze: 10 to 50 area%, tempered martensite: 10 to 80 area%, (3) When the metal structure was measured by X-ray diffraction, Residual austenite: 5.0% by volume with respect to the entire structure Furthermore, the residual austenite having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less: 3.5% by volume or more and the residual austenite having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less: 2.4% by volume or less are satisfied. It is a strength steel plate.
このような構成によれば、室温での伸び及び穴拡げ性が良好で、しかも100~350℃の温間で加工するときの成形荷重を、室温で加工するときの成形荷重よりも格段に低減した引張強度が980MPa以上の高強度鋼板を提供できる。 According to such a configuration, the elongation and hole expandability at room temperature are good, and the molding load when processing at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C. is markedly reduced from the molding load when processing at room temperature. A high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more can be provided.
上記高強度鋼板は、更に、他の元素として、質量%で、Cr:0%超、1%以下、及びMo:0%超、1%以下よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種を含有してもよい。 The high-strength steel sheet further contains at least one element selected from the group consisting of Cr: more than 0%, 1% or less, and Mo: more than 0%, 1% or less as other elements, as other elements. Also good.
また、上記高強度鋼板は、更に、他の元素として、質量%で、Ti:0%超、0.15%以下、Nb:0%超、0.15%以下、及びV:0%超、0.15%以下よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種を含有してもよい。 Further, the high-strength steel plate, as other elements, in mass%, Ti: more than 0%, 0.15% or less, Nb: more than 0%, 0.15% or less, and V: more than 0%, You may contain at least 1 sort (s) chosen from the group which consists of 0.15% or less.
また、上記高強度鋼板は、更に、他の元素として、質量%で、Cu:0%超、1%以下、及びNi:0%超、1%以下よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種を含有してもよい。 The high-strength steel sheet further contains at least one element selected from the group consisting of Cu: more than 0%, less than 1%, and Ni: more than 0%, less than 1% as other elements. May be.
また、上記高強度鋼板は、更に、他の元素として、質量%で、B:0%超、0.005%以下を含有してもよい。 The high-strength steel sheet may further contain B: more than 0% and 0.005% or less in terms of mass% as other elements.
また、上記高強度鋼板は、更に、他の元素として、質量%で、Ca:0%超、0.01%以下、Mg:0%超、0.01%以下、及び希土類元素:0%超、0.01%以下よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種を含有してもよい。 In addition, the high-strength steel sheet further includes, as other elements, mass%, Ca: more than 0%, 0.01% or less, Mg: more than 0%, 0.01% or less, and rare earth elements: more than 0%. , At least one selected from the group consisting of 0.01% or less.
また、前記高強度鋼板には、その表面に、電気亜鉛めっき層、溶融亜鉛めっき層、又は合金化溶融亜鉛めっき層を有する高強度鋼板も包含される。 The high-strength steel sheet includes a high-strength steel sheet having an electrogalvanized layer, a hot-dip galvanized layer, or an alloyed hot-dip galvanized layer on the surface.
また、本発明の他の一局面は、前記成分組成を満足する鋼板を800℃以上、Ac3点以下のT1温度域に加熱し、該T1温度域で40秒間以上保持して均熱する均熱工程と、均熱後、下記式(I)で表されるMs点が350℃以上の場合は、350℃以下、100℃以上を満たす任意の冷却停止温度T2まで、又は下記式(I)で表されるMs点が350℃未満の場合は、Ms点以下、100℃以上を満たす任意の冷却停止温度T2まで冷却するにあたり、700℃から、300℃又は前記冷却停止温度T2のうちの高い方の温度までを平均冷却速度5℃/秒以上とする第一冷却工程と、350℃超、540℃以下のT3温度域に再加熱し、該T3温度域で50秒間以上保持する再加熱工程と、保持後、前記T3温度域から300℃までを平均冷却速度10℃/秒以上で冷却し、300℃から150℃までを平均冷却速度0℃/秒超、10℃/秒未満で冷却する第二冷却工程とを含むことを特徴とする高強度鋼板の製造方法である。
Ms点(℃)=561-474×[C]/(1-Vf/100)-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo] ・・・(I)
In another aspect of the present invention, a steel sheet satisfying the above component composition is heated to a T1 temperature range of 800 ° C. or higher and Ac 3 points or lower, and held in the T1 temperature range for 40 seconds or more to soak. When the Ms point represented by the following formula (I) is 350 ° C. or higher after the heating step and soaking, up to any cooling stop temperature T2 that satisfies 350 ° C. or lower and 100 ° C. or higher, or the following formula (I) In the case where the Ms point represented by is less than 350 ° C., the cooling stop temperature T2 is less than the Ms point and is 100 ° C. or higher, and from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C. or higher of the cooling stop temperature T2 A first cooling step in which the average cooling rate is 5 ° C./second or higher, and a reheating step in which the temperature is reheated to a T3 temperature range of more than 350 ° C. and 540 ° C. and held for 50 seconds or more in the T3 temperature range And after holding, from the T3 temperature range to 300 ℃ And a second cooling step of cooling at an average cooling rate of 10 ° C./second or more and cooling from 300 ° C. to 150 ° C. at an average cooling rate of more than 0 ° C./second and less than 10 ° C./second. It is a manufacturing method of a steel plate.
Ms point (° C.) = 561−474 × [C] / (1−Vf / 100) −33 × [Mn] −17 × [Ni] −17 × [Cr] −21 × [Mo] (I )
上記式(I)中、Vfは、別途、上記高強度鋼板の製造条件と同じ条件で上記均熱工程を行った後、上記第一冷却工程における上記高強度鋼板の製造条件と同じ平均冷却速度で室温まで冷却して得られたサンプル中のポリゴナルフェライト分率(面積%)を意味する。また、上記式(I)中、[ ]は各元素の含有量(質量%)を示しており、鋼板に含まれない元素の含有量は0質量%として計算する。 In the above formula (I), Vf is the same average cooling rate as the production conditions for the high-strength steel plate in the first cooling step after separately performing the soaking step under the same conditions as the production conditions for the high-strength steel plate. Means the fraction of polygonal ferrite (area%) in the sample obtained by cooling to room temperature. Moreover, in the said formula (I), [] has shown content (mass%) of each element, and content of the element which is not contained in a steel plate is calculated as 0 mass%.
また、前記高強度鋼板の製造方法において、前記第二冷却工程後、電気亜鉛めっきを行ってもよい。 In the method for producing the high-strength steel plate, electrogalvanization may be performed after the second cooling step.
また、前記高強度鋼板の製造方法において、前記再加熱工程で、溶融亜鉛めっき、又は合金化溶融亜鉛めっきを行ってもよい。 In the method for producing the high-strength steel sheet, hot dip galvanization or alloyed hot dip galvanization may be performed in the reheating step.
本発明によれば、鋼板の成分組成及び金属組織を適切に制御しており、特に、残留γの炭素濃度を厳密に制御しているため、室温での伸び及び穴拡げ性が良好で、しかも100~350℃の温間で加工するときの成形荷重を、室温で加工するときの成形荷重よりも格段に低減した引張強度が980MPa以上の高強度鋼板、及びその製造方法を提供できる。 According to the present invention, the component composition and metal structure of the steel sheet are appropriately controlled, and in particular, the carbon concentration of residual γ is strictly controlled, so that the elongation and hole expansibility at room temperature are good, It is possible to provide a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more and a method for producing the same, in which a forming load when processing at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C. is significantly reduced as compared with a forming load when processing at room temperature.
以下、実施例を挙げて本発明をより具体的に説明するが、本発明は下記実施例によって制限を受けるものではなく、前記及び後記の趣旨に適合し得る範囲で変更を加えて実施することも勿論可能であり、それらはいずれも本発明の技術的範囲に包含される。 EXAMPLES Hereinafter, the present invention will be described more specifically with reference to examples. However, the present invention is not limited by the following examples, and may be implemented with modifications within a range that can meet the above and the gist described below. Of course, these are all possible and are included in the technical scope of the present invention.
下記表1に示す成分を含有し、残部が鉄及び不可避不純物からなる鋼を溶製して鋼材を製造した。得られた鋼材を1250℃で30分間加熱保持した後、圧下率を約90%とし、仕上げ圧延温度が920℃となるように熱間圧延し、この温度から平均冷却速度30℃/秒で巻取り温度600℃まで冷却して巻き取った。巻き取った後、室温まで冷却して板厚2.6mmの熱延鋼板を製造した。 A steel material was manufactured by melting steel containing the components shown in Table 1 below, the balance being iron and inevitable impurities. The obtained steel material was heated and held at 1250 ° C. for 30 minutes, then hot-rolled so that the reduction rate was about 90% and the finish rolling temperature was 920 ° C. From this temperature, the steel was wound at an average cooling rate of 30 ° C./second. It was cooled to a take-up temperature of 600 ° C. and wound up. After winding, it was cooled to room temperature to produce a hot-rolled steel plate having a thickness of 2.6 mm.
得られた熱延鋼板を酸洗して表面スケールを除去してから、冷延率46%で冷間圧延を行い、板厚1.4mmの冷延鋼板を製造した。 The obtained hot-rolled steel sheet was pickled to remove the surface scale, and then cold-rolled at a cold rolling rate of 46% to produce a cold-rolled steel sheet having a thickness of 1.4 mm.
得られた冷延鋼板を連続焼鈍して供試材を製造した。すなわち、得られた冷延鋼板を、下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す均熱温度T1(℃)に加熱し、下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す均熱時間t1(秒)保持して均熱した後、下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す冷却停止温度T2(℃)まで冷却した。700℃から300℃又は前記冷却停止温度T2のうち高い方までの平均冷却速度CR1(℃/秒)を下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す。 The obtained cold-rolled steel sheet was continuously annealed to produce a test material. That is, the obtained cold-rolled steel sheet was heated to a soaking temperature T1 (° C.) shown in the following Table 2-1 or Table 2-2, and a soaking time t1 (shown in the following Table 2-1 or Table 2-2). Second) and soaking, and then cooled to the cooling stop temperature T2 (° C.) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below. The average cooling rate CR1 (° C./second) from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C. or higher of the cooling stop temperature T2 is shown in the following Table 2-1 or Table 2-2.
また、下記表2-1及び表2-2には、下記表1に示した成分組成及び上記式(I)に基づいて算出したMs点(℃)を併せて示す。 Tables 2-1 and 2-2 below also show the composition of the components shown in Table 1 below and the Ms point (° C.) calculated based on the above formula (I).
次に、上記冷却停止温度T2(℃)から、下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す再加熱温度T3(℃)まで加熱し、この温度で下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す保持時間t3(秒)保持した。 Next, heating is performed from the cooling stop temperature T2 (° C.) to the reheating temperature T3 (° C.) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below. The indicated holding time t3 (second) was held.
保持した後は、室温まで冷却した。このとき、上記再加熱温度T3(℃)から300℃までは、下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す平均冷却速度CR2(℃/秒)で冷却し、300℃から150℃までは、下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す平均冷却速度CR3(℃/秒)で冷却した。 After holding, it was cooled to room temperature. At this time, the reheating temperature T3 (° C.) to 300 ° C. is cooled at an average cooling rate CR2 (° C./second) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below, and from 300 ° C. to 150 ° C., Cooling was performed at an average cooling rate CR3 (° C./second) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below.
連続焼鈍して得られた供試材の一部については、下記めっき処理を施してEG鋼板、GI鋼板、GA鋼板を製造した。 Some of the test materials obtained by continuous annealing were subjected to the following plating treatment to produce EG steel plates, GI steel plates, and GA steel plates.
[電気亜鉛めっき(EG)処理]
連続焼鈍した後、室温まで冷却し、次いで供試材を55℃の亜鉛めっき浴に浸漬して電流密度30~50A/dm2で電気亜鉛めっき処理を施した後、水洗、乾燥してEG鋼板を製造した。電気亜鉛めっきの付着量は、片面当たり10~100g/m2とした。
[Electrogalvanizing (EG) treatment]
After continuous annealing, it is cooled to room temperature, and then the specimen is immersed in a galvanizing bath at 55 ° C., subjected to electrogalvanizing treatment at a current density of 30 to 50 A / dm 2 , washed with water and dried to provide an EG steel sheet. Manufactured. The amount of electrogalvanized adhesion was 10 to 100 g / m 2 per side.
[溶融亜鉛めっき(GI)処理]
上記冷却停止温度T2(℃)から、下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す再加熱温度T3(℃)まで加熱した後、温度460℃の溶融亜鉛めっき浴に浸漬してめっき処理を施し、室温まで冷却してGI鋼板を製造した。上記T3温度域での滞在時間を下記表2-1又は表2-2に示した保持時間t3(秒)の欄に示す。溶融亜鉛めっきの付着量は、片面当たり10~100g/m2とした。
[Hot galvanizing (GI) treatment]
After heating from the cooling stop temperature T2 (° C.) to the reheating temperature T3 (° C.) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below, the plate is immersed in a hot dip galvanizing bath at a temperature of 460 ° C. The GI steel sheet was manufactured by cooling to room temperature. The residence time in the T3 temperature range is shown in the column of holding time t3 (seconds) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below. The adhesion amount of hot dip galvanizing was 10 to 100 g / m 2 per side.
[合金化溶融亜鉛めっき(GA)処理]
上記溶融亜鉛めっき浴に浸漬後、さらに、下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す温度で合金化処理を行ってから室温まで冷却してGA鋼板を製造した。上記T3温度域での滞在時間を下記表2-1又は表2-2に示した保持時間t3(秒)の欄に示す。合金化溶融亜鉛めっきの付着量は、片面当たり10~100g/m2とした。
[Alloyed hot dip galvanizing (GA) treatment]
After immersion in the hot dip galvanizing bath, alloying treatment was further performed at the temperature shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below, and then cooled to room temperature to produce a GA steel sheet. The residence time in the T3 temperature range is shown in the column of holding time t3 (seconds) shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below. The adhesion amount of the galvannealed alloy was 10 to 100 g / m 2 per side.
得られた供試材の区分を下記表2-1又は表2-2に示す。表中、冷延は冷延鋼板、EGはEG鋼板、GIはGI鋼板、GAはGA鋼板をそれぞれ示す。 The categories of the obtained specimens are shown in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 below. In the table, cold rolling indicates a cold rolled steel sheet, EG indicates an EG steel sheet, GI indicates a GI steel sheet, and GA indicates a GA steel sheet.
得られた供試材(冷延鋼板、EG鋼板、GI鋼板、GA鋼板を含む意味。以下、同じ。)について、金属組織の観察と機械的特性の評価を次の手順で行った。 For the obtained specimens (meaning including cold-rolled steel sheet, EG steel sheet, GI steel sheet, GA steel sheet, the same applies hereinafter), the observation of the metal structure and the evaluation of the mechanical properties were performed according to the following procedure.
≪金属組織の観察≫
金属組織のうち、ポリゴナルフェライト、ベイナイト、及び焼戻しマルテンサイトの各面積率は、走査型電子顕微鏡で観察した結果に基づいて算出し、残留γの体積率は、X線回折法により測定した。
≪Observation of metal structure≫
Among the metal structures, the area ratios of polygonal ferrite, bainite, and tempered martensite were calculated based on the results observed with a scanning electron microscope, and the volume ratio of residual γ was measured by the X-ray diffraction method.
[ポリゴナルフェライト、ベイナイト、焼戻しマルテンサイト]
供試材の圧延方向に平行な断面を研磨した後、ナイタール腐食させて板厚の1/4位置を走査型電子顕微鏡で、倍率3000倍で5視野観察した。観察視野は約40μm×約30μmとした。ポリゴナルフェライトの面積率は、この走査型電子顕微鏡の観察によって測定できる。また、ベイナイトと焼戻しマルテンサイトとの面積率は、観察視野内において白色又は薄い灰色として観察される残留γ及び炭化物よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種同士の間隔の平均(平均間隔)を、前述した方法に基づいて測定し、測定した平均間隔によってベイナイトと焼戻しマルテンサイトとに区別し、点算法により測定した。
[Polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite]
After polishing the cross section parallel to the rolling direction of the test material, it was subjected to Nital corrosion, and the 1/4 position of the plate thickness was observed with a scanning electron microscope at a magnification of 3000 times for 5 fields of view. The observation visual field was about 40 μm × about 30 μm. The area ratio of polygonal ferrite can be measured by observation with this scanning electron microscope. Further, the area ratio between bainite and tempered martensite is the average (average interval) of the interval between at least one selected from the group consisting of residual γ and carbide observed as white or light gray in the observation field. Measured based on the measured method, bainite and tempered martensite were distinguished by the measured average interval, and measured by the point calculation method.
測定結果を下記表3-1又は表3-2に示す。下記表3-1又は表3-2において、Fは、ポリゴナルフェライトの面積率を示し、Bはベイナイトの面積率を示し、TMは焼戻しマルテンサイトの面積率を示している。残部は、残留γ、フレッシュマルテンサイトと残留γが複合したMA混合相、パーライト、フレッシュマルテンサイトである。 The measurement results are shown in Table 3-1 or Table 3-2 below. In Table 3-1 or Table 3-2 below, F represents the area ratio of polygonal ferrite, B represents the area ratio of bainite, and TM represents the area ratio of tempered martensite. The balance is residual γ, MA mixed phase in which fresh martensite and residual γ are combined, pearlite, and fresh martensite.
[残留γ]
供試材の板厚の1/4位置まで研削した後、研削面を化学研磨してからX線回折法により金属組織全体に対する残留γの体積率を測定した(ISIJ Int. Vol.33、1933年、No.7、p.776)。
[Residual γ]
After grinding to 1/4 position of the thickness of the specimen, the ground surface was chemically polished, and then the volume ratio of residual γ with respect to the entire metal structure was measured by X-ray diffraction (ISIJ Int. Vol. 33, 1933). Year, No. 7, p. 776).
また、残留γ中の炭素濃度を上述した手順で測定し、金属組織全体に対する、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γの体積率[VγR(C≦1.0%)]、及び炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γの体積率[VγR(C≦0.8%)]を算出した。 Further, the carbon concentration in the residual γ is measured by the procedure described above, and the volume ratio of the residual γ having a carbon concentration of 1.0 mass% or less [Vγ R (C ≦ 1.0%)] with respect to the entire metal structure, and The volume fraction [Vγ R (C ≦ 0.8%)] of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less was calculated.
なお、参考データとして、残留γ中の炭素濃度分布の平均値%Cavg、及び標準偏差σ%Cを下記表3-1又は表3-2に併せて示す。 As reference data, the average value% C avg of the carbon concentration distribution in the residual γ and the standard deviation σ% C are also shown in Table 3-1 or Table 3-2 below.
≪機械的特性の評価≫
[室温での引張強度(TS)、伸び(EL)]
室温(25℃)での引張強度(TS)と伸び(EL)とは、JIS Z2241に基づいて、引張試験を行って測定した。試験片としては、供試材の圧延方向に対して垂直な方向が長手方向となるように、JIS Z2201で規定される5号試験片を供試材から切り出したものを用いた。引張試験の引張速度は、10mm/分とした。
≪Evaluation of mechanical properties≫
[Tensile strength at room temperature (TS), elongation (EL)]
Tensile strength (TS) and elongation (EL) at room temperature (25 ° C.) were measured by performing a tensile test based on JIS Z2241. As the test piece, a test piece obtained by cutting out a No. 5 test piece defined in JIS Z2201 so that the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the test material is the longitudinal direction was used. The tensile speed of the tensile test was 10 mm / min.
室温で測定したTS及びELの結果を下記表3-1又は表3-2に示す。 The results of TS and EL measured at room temperature are shown in Table 3-1 or Table 3-2 below.
また、室温で測定したTSとELの積(TS×EL)を算出し、結果を下記表3-1又は表3-2に示す。 Also, the product of TS and EL measured at room temperature (TS × EL) was calculated, and the results are shown in Table 3-1 or Table 3-2 below.
[ΔTS]
温間成形時の荷重低減度合いを評価するために、室温(25℃)での引張強度(室温TS)から温間(200℃)での引張強度(温間TS)を引いた値(室温TS-温間TS=ΔTS)を算出した。引張試験は、プレス加工時の速度を模擬するために引張速度を1000mm/分とし、室温と200℃の2水準で行う以外は、上記と同じ条件で行った。算出したΔTSを、下記表3-1又は表3-2に示す。
[ΔTS]
In order to evaluate the degree of load reduction during warm forming, a value obtained by subtracting the tensile strength (warm TS) at warm (200 ° C) from the tensile strength (room temperature TS) at room temperature (25 ° C) (room temperature TS). -Warm TS = ΔTS) was calculated. The tensile test was performed under the same conditions as described above except that the tensile speed was 1000 mm / min in order to simulate the speed at the time of press working, and the test was performed at two levels of room temperature and 200 ° C. The calculated ΔTS is shown in Table 3-1 or Table 3-2 below.
[穴拡げ性]
穴拡げ性は、JIS Z2256に基づいて穴拡げ試験を行って測定した穴拡げ率(λ)によって評価した。測定結果を下記表3-1又は表3-2の「λ(%)」の欄に示す。
[Hole expandability]
The hole expandability was evaluated by the hole expansion rate (λ) measured by performing a hole expansion test based on JIS Z2256. The measurement results are shown in the column of “λ (%)” in Table 3-1 or Table 3-2 below.
本発明では、TSが980MPa以上の場合を、高強度と評価した。また、TS×ELが16000MPa・%以上で、且つ、λが20%以上の場合を、室温での加工性に優れると評価した。また、ΔTSが150MPa以上の場合を、温間での成形荷重が低減されたと評価した。そして、TS、TS×EL、λ、及びΔTSの全てが基準値を満足する場合を合格とした。一方、TS、TS×EL、λ、又はΔTSのうちいずれかが基準値に満たない場合を不合格とした。 In the present invention, the case where TS was 980 MPa or more was evaluated as high strength. Further, when TS × EL was 16000 MPa ·% or more and λ was 20% or more, it was evaluated that the processability at room temperature was excellent. Moreover, when ΔTS was 150 MPa or more, it was evaluated that the molding load during warming was reduced. And the case where all of TS, TSxEL, (lambda), and (DELTA) TS satisfy a reference value was set as the pass. On the other hand, the case where any of TS, TS × EL, λ, or ΔTS did not satisfy the reference value was regarded as unacceptable.
下記表1、表2-1、表2-2、表3-1、表3-2から次のように考察できる。 The following can be considered from Table 1, Table 2-1, Table 2-2, Table 3-1, and Table 3-2.
No.1、7、8、10、13、15、17、20、22、23、26~31、33、37、38、40、及び42は、いずれも本発明で規定する要件を満足する例であり、室温で測定したTSは980MPa以上となり、高強度である。また、TS×EL及びλが本発明の合格基準を満足しており、室温での加工性が良好である。さらに、ΔTSが本発明の合格基準を満足しているため、温間での成形荷重を低減できた。 No. 1, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 17, 20, 22, 23, 26 to 31, 33, 37, 38, 40, and 42 are examples that satisfy the requirements defined in the present invention. The TS measured at room temperature is 980 MPa or higher and has high strength. Further, TS × EL and λ satisfy the acceptance criteria of the present invention, and the processability at room temperature is good. Furthermore, since ΔTS satisfied the acceptance criteria of the present invention, the molding load during warming could be reduced.
一方、No.2~6、9、11、12、14、16、18、19、21、24、25、32、34~36、39、及び41は、本発明で規定するいずれかの要件を満足しない例であり、強度、室温での加工性、及び温間での成形荷重低減のうち、少なくとも一つの特性が劣化している。 On the other hand, No. 2 to 6, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 32, 34 to 36, 39, and 41 are examples that do not satisfy any of the requirements defined in the present invention. In addition, at least one of the properties of strength, workability at room temperature, and reduction of warm forming load is deteriorated.
以下、詳細に説明する。 The details will be described below.
No.2、6、12、及び41は、再加熱工程での保持後の300℃から150℃までの平均冷却速度CR3が大きすぎ、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γが多く生成した例であり、λが小さくなり、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。 No. 2, 6, 12, and 41 are examples in which the average cooling rate CR3 from 300 ° C. to 150 ° C. after holding in the reheating step is too large, and a large amount of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 0.8 mass% or less is generated. Λ was reduced and the processability at room temperature could not be improved.
No.3、5、及び39は、再加熱温度(再加熱工程での保持温度)から300℃までの平均冷却速度CR2が小さすぎ、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γ量を確保できなかった例であり、ΔTSが小さくなり、温間での成形荷重を低減できなかった。なお、No.3は、上記特許文献1を模擬した例であり、上記特許文献1の段落[0128]に記載されているように、保持後、室温までの平均冷却速度を5℃/秒とした。 No. 3, 5, and 39, the average cooling rate CR2 from the reheating temperature (the holding temperature in the reheating process) to 300 ° C. is too small, and the residual γ amount with a carbon concentration of 1.0 mass% or less cannot be secured. In this example, ΔTS was small, and the molding load during warming could not be reduced. In addition, No. 3 is an example simulating the above-mentioned Patent Document 1. As described in paragraph [0128] of the above-mentioned Patent Document 1, the average cooling rate to room temperature after holding was set to 5 ° C./second.
No.4、19、及び32は、均熱後の冷却停止温度T2が高すぎた例である。No.4、19、及び32は、焼戻しマルテンサイトが生成しないか、生成量が少なかったため、室温でのTSが低くなり、強度を確保できなかった。また、No.4、19、及び32は、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γが多く生成したため、λが小さくなり、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。なお、No.19は、保持時間t3が比較的長く、ポリゴナルフェライトの生成量が比較的少なかったため、ベイナイトが過剰に生成したと考えられる。すなわち、ポリゴナルフェライトの生成量が少ないほど、周囲のオーステナイトにCが濃化しにくくなるため、ベイナイト変態が速く起こると考えられる。 No. 4, 19, and 32 are examples in which the cooling stop temperature T2 after soaking is too high. No. In 4, 19, and 32, since tempered martensite was not generated or the amount of generation was small, TS at room temperature was low, and strength could not be secured. No. In 4, 19, and 32, since a large amount of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 0.8 mass% or less was generated, λ was small, and workability at room temperature could not be improved. In addition, No. In No. 19, the retention time t3 was relatively long, and the amount of polygonal ferrite produced was relatively small, so it is considered that bainite was excessively produced. That is, the smaller the amount of polygonal ferrite produced, the less likely it is that C is concentrated in the surrounding austenite, so the bainite transformation is considered to occur faster.
No.9は、均熱後、700℃から300℃までの区間における平均冷却速度CR1が小さすぎたため、ポリゴナルフェライトが過剰に生成した例である。その結果、No.9は、所望のTSを確保できなかった。 No. No. 9 is an example in which polygonal ferrite was excessively generated because the average cooling rate CR1 in the section from 700 ° C. to 300 ° C. was too small after soaking. As a result, no. No. 9 could not secure the desired TS.
No.11は、均熱温度T1が高すぎたため、ポリゴナルフェライトがほとんど生成しなかった例である。その結果、No.11は、TS×ELが低くなり、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。 No. 11 is an example in which polygonal ferrite was hardly generated because the soaking temperature T1 was too high. As a result, no. No. 11, TS × EL was low, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved.
No.14は、均熱後の冷却停止温度T2が低すぎた例である。No.14は、ベイナイトが生成せず、焼戻しマルテンサイトが過剰に生成したため、残留γの生成量を確保できなかった。その結果、No.14は、TS×ELが低くなり、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。また、No.14は、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γ量を確保できなかったため、ΔTSが小さくなり、温間での成形荷重を低減できなかった。 No. 14 is an example in which the cooling stop temperature T2 after soaking is too low. No. In No. 14, bainite was not generated, and tempered martensite was excessively generated, so that the amount of residual γ generated could not be secured. As a result, no. No. 14, TS × EL was low, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved. No. No. 14 could not secure the amount of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less, so ΔTS was small, and the molding load during warming could not be reduced.
No.16は、均熱温度T1が低すぎたため、ポリゴナルフェライトが過剰に生成した例である。その結果、No.16は、所望のTSを確保できなかった。また、No.16は、TS×ELが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。これは、冷間圧延時に導入された加工組織が残存したからと考えられる。 No. No. 16 is an example in which polygonal ferrite is excessively generated because the soaking temperature T1 is too low. As a result, no. No. 16 could not secure the desired TS. No. No. 16, TS × EL decreased, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved. This is presumably because the work structure introduced during cold rolling remained.
No.18は、再加熱温度T3が高すぎた例である。No.18は、ベイナイトがほとんど生成せず、残留γの生成量を確保できなかったため、TS×ELが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。また、No.18は、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γが過剰に生成したため、λが小さくなり、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。 No. 18 is an example in which the reheating temperature T3 is too high. No. In No. 18, bainite hardly formed and the amount of residual γ could not be secured, so TS × EL was lowered and workability at room temperature could not be improved. No. In No. 18, since residual γ having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less was excessively generated, λ became small, and workability at room temperature could not be improved.
No.21は、再加熱温度T3が低すぎたため、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γ量を確保できなかった例である。その結果、No.21は、ΔTSが小さくなり、温間での成形荷重を低減できなかった。 No. No. 21 is an example in which the amount of residual γ having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less could not be secured because the reheating temperature T3 was too low. As a result, no. In No. 21, ΔTS was small, and the molding load during warming could not be reduced.
No.24は、均熱時間t1が短すぎたため、所望の残留γ量を確保できなかった例である。その結果、No.24は、TS×ELが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。 No. No. 24 is an example in which a desired residual γ amount could not be ensured because the soaking time t1 was too short. As a result, no. In No. 24, TS × EL decreased, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved.
No.25は、保持時間t3が短すぎた例である。No.25は、ベイナイト及び残留γの生成量を確保できなかったため、TS×ELが低下し、また、炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留γが過剰に生成したため、λが小さくなり、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。 No. 25 is an example in which the holding time t3 is too short. No. 25, because the production amount of bainite and residual γ could not be ensured, TS × EL decreased, and since the residual γ with a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less was excessively generated, λ became small, at room temperature. It was not possible to improve the workability.
No.34~36は、成分組成が本発明で規定する要件を満足しない例である。 No. 34 to 36 are examples in which the component composition does not satisfy the requirements defined in the present invention.
No.34は、Si量が少なすぎたため、TSが低下し、強度を確保できなかった。また、No.34は、残留γの生成量を確保できなかったため、TS×ELが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。また、No.34は、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γ量を確保できなかった例であり、ΔTSが小さくなり、温間での成形荷重を低減できなかった。 No. In 34, since the amount of Si was too small, TS decreased and the strength could not be secured. No. No. 34 could not secure the yield of residual γ, so TS × EL decreased, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved. No. No. 34 was an example in which the amount of residual γ with a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less could not be ensured, ΔTS became small, and the molding load during warming could not be reduced.
No.35は、C量が少なすぎたため、TSが低下し、強度を確保できなかった。また、No.35は、残留γの生成量を確保できなかったため、TS×ELが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。また、No.35は、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γ量を確保できなかった例であり、ΔTSが小さくなり、温間での成形荷重を低減できなかった。 No. In 35, since the amount of C was too small, TS decreased and the strength could not be secured. No. For 35, the amount of residual γ produced could not be secured, so TS × EL decreased, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved. No. No. 35 was an example in which the amount of residual γ with a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less could not be ensured, ΔTS became small, and the molding load during warm could not be reduced.
No.36は、Mn量が少なすぎたため、ポリゴナルフェライトが過剰に生成し、TSが低下し、強度を確保できなかった。また、No.36は、残留γの生成量を確保できなかったため、TS×ELが低下し、室温での加工性を改善できなかった。また、No.36は、炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留γ量を確保できなかった例であり、ΔTSが小さくなり、温間での成形荷重を低減できなかった。 No. In No. 36, since the amount of Mn was too small, polygonal ferrite was excessively generated, TS was lowered, and the strength could not be secured. No. For 36, the amount of residual γ produced could not be secured, so TS × EL decreased, and the processability at room temperature could not be improved. No. No. 36 was an example in which the amount of residual γ with a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less could not be ensured, ΔTS became small, and the molding load during warm could not be reduced.
この出願は、2016年2月29日に出願された日本国特許出願特願2016-038304及び2016年9月20日に出願された日本国特許出願特願2016-182966を基礎とするものであり、その内容は、本願に含まれるものである。 This application is based on Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-0383304 filed on February 29, 2016 and Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-182966 filed on September 20, 2016. The contents thereof are included in the present application.
本発明を表現するために、上述において図面を参照しながら実施形態を通して本発明を適切且つ十分に説明したが、当業者であれば上述の実施形態を変更及び/又は改良することは容易に為し得ることであると認識すべきである。したがって、当業者が実施する変更形態又は改良形態が、請求の範囲に記載された請求項の権利範囲を離脱するレベルのものでない限り、当該変更形態又は当該改良形態は、当該請求項の権利範囲に包括されると解釈される。 In order to express the present invention, the present invention has been properly and fully described through the embodiments with reference to the drawings. However, those skilled in the art can easily change and / or improve the above-described embodiments. It should be recognized that this is possible. Therefore, unless the modifications or improvements implemented by those skilled in the art are at a level that departs from the scope of the claims recited in the claims, the modifications or improvements are not limited to the scope of the claims. To be construed as inclusive.
本発明によれば、鋼板の成分組成及び金属組織を適切に制御しており、特に、残留γの炭素濃度を厳密に制御しているため、室温での伸び及び穴拡げ性が良好で、しかも100~350℃の温間で加工するときの成形荷重を、室温で加工するときの成形荷重よりも格段に低減した引張強度が980MPa以上の高強度鋼板、及びその製造方法が提供される。
According to the present invention, the component composition and metal structure of the steel sheet are appropriately controlled, and in particular, the carbon concentration of residual γ is strictly controlled, so that the elongation and hole expansibility at room temperature are good, Provided are a high-strength steel sheet having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more and a method for producing the same, in which a forming load when processing at a temperature of 100 to 350 ° C. is significantly reduced as compared with a forming load when processing at room temperature.
Claims (6)
C :0.10~0.5%、
Si:1.0~3%、
Mn:1.5~3%、
P :0%超、0.1%以下、
S :0%超、0.05%以下、
Al:0.005~1%、及び
N :0%超、0.01%以下を満足し、
残部が鉄及び不可避不純物からなる鋼板であり、
(1)該鋼板の金属組織は、ポリゴナルフェライト、ベイナイト、焼戻しマルテンサイト、及び残留オーステナイトを含み、
(2)前記金属組織を走査型電子顕微鏡で観察したときに、金属組織全体に対して、
ポリゴナルフェライト:10~50面積%、
ベイナイト:10~50面積%、
焼戻しマルテンサイト:10~80面積%を満足し、
(3)前記金属組織をX線回折法で測定したときに、金属組織全体に対して、
残留オーステナイト:5.0体積%以上、
炭素濃度が1.0質量%以下の残留オーステナイト:3.5体積%以上、
炭素濃度が0.8質量%以下の残留オーステナイト:2.4体積%以下を満足すること
を特徴とする高強度鋼板。 % By mass
C: 0.10 to 0.5%,
Si: 1.0-3%,
Mn: 1.5 to 3%,
P: more than 0%, 0.1% or less,
S: more than 0%, 0.05% or less,
Al: 0.005 to 1%, and N: more than 0% and 0.01% or less,
The balance is a steel plate made of iron and inevitable impurities,
(1) The metal structure of the steel sheet includes polygonal ferrite, bainite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite,
(2) When the metal structure is observed with a scanning electron microscope,
Polygonal ferrite: 10 to 50 area%,
Bainite: 10-50 area%,
Tempered martensite: 10 to 80% by area satisfied,
(3) When the metal structure is measured by the X-ray diffraction method,
Residual austenite: 5.0% by volume or more,
Residual austenite having a carbon concentration of 1.0% by mass or less: 3.5% by volume or more,
Residual austenite having a carbon concentration of 0.8% by mass or less: A high-strength steel sheet satisfying 2.4% by volume or less.
Cr:0%超、1%以下、
Mo:0%超、1%以下、
Ti:0%超、0.15%以下、
Nb:0%超、0.15%以下、
V :0%超、0.15%以下、
Cu:0%超、1%以下、
Ni:0%超、1%以下、
B :0%超、0.005%以下、
Ca:0%超、0.01%以下、
Mg:0%超、0.01%以下、及び
希土類元素:0%超、0.01%以下よりなる群から選ばれる少なくとも1種を含有する請求項1に記載の高強度鋼板。 Furthermore, as other elements,
Cr: more than 0%, 1% or less,
Mo: more than 0%, 1% or less,
Ti: more than 0%, 0.15% or less,
Nb: more than 0%, 0.15% or less,
V: more than 0%, 0.15% or less,
Cu: more than 0%, 1% or less,
Ni: more than 0%, 1% or less,
B: more than 0%, 0.005% or less,
Ca: more than 0%, 0.01% or less,
The high-strength steel sheet according to claim 1, comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of Mg: more than 0% and 0.01% or less, and rare earth elements: more than 0% and 0.01% or less.
前記成分組成を満足する鋼板を800℃以上、Ac3点以下のT1温度域に加熱し、該T1温度域で40秒間以上保持して均熱する均熱工程と、
均熱後、
下記式(I)で表されるMs点が350℃以上の場合は、350℃以下、100℃以上を満たす任意の冷却停止温度T2まで、又は
下記式(I)で表されるMs点が350℃未満の場合は、Ms点以下、100℃以上を満たす任意の冷却停止温度T2まで冷却するにあたり、700℃から、300℃又は前記冷却停止温度T2のうちの高い方の温度までを平均冷却速度5℃/秒以上とする第一冷却工程と、
350℃超、540℃以下のT3温度域に再加熱し、該T3温度域で50秒間以上保持する再加熱工程と、
保持後、前記T3温度域から300℃までを平均冷却速度10℃/秒以上で冷却し、300℃から150℃までを平均冷却速度0℃/秒超、10℃/秒未満で冷却する第二冷却工程と
を含むことを特徴とする高強度鋼板の製造方法。
Ms点(℃)=561-474×[C]/(1-Vf/100)-33×[Mn]-17×[Ni]-17×[Cr]-21×[Mo] ・・・(I)
上記式(I)中、Vfは、別途、上記高強度鋼板の製造条件と同じ条件で上記均熱工程を行った後、上記第一冷却工程における上記高強度鋼板の製造条件と同じ平均冷却速度で室温まで冷却して得られたサンプル中のポリゴナルフェライト分率(面積%)を意味する。また、上記式(I)中、[ ]は各元素の含有量(質量%)を示しており、鋼板に含まれない元素の含有量は0質量%として計算する。 A method for producing the high-strength steel sheet according to claim 1 or 2,
A soaking step of heating the steel sheet satisfying the above component composition to a T1 temperature range of 800 ° C. or more and Ac 3 points or less, and holding and soaking in the T1 temperature range for 40 seconds or more
After soaking,
When the Ms point represented by the following formula (I) is 350 ° C. or higher, up to an arbitrary cooling stop temperature T2 that satisfies 350 ° C. or lower, 100 ° C. or higher, or the Ms point represented by the following formula (I) is 350 In the case of less than ℃, when cooling to an arbitrary cooling stop temperature T2 that satisfies the Ms point or lower and 100 ° C or higher, the average cooling rate from 700 ° C to 300 ° C or the higher one of the cooling stop temperatures T2 A first cooling step of 5 ° C./second or more;
A reheating step of reheating to a T3 temperature range of more than 350 ° C. and 540 ° C. or less, and holding for 50 seconds or more in the T3 temperature range;
After holding, the temperature is cooled from the T3 temperature range to 300 ° C. at an average cooling rate of 10 ° C./second or more, and from 300 ° C. to 150 ° C. is cooled at an average cooling rate of more than 0 ° C./second and less than 10 ° C./second. A method for producing a high-strength steel sheet, comprising a cooling step.
Ms point (° C.) = 561−474 × [C] / (1−Vf / 100) −33 × [Mn] −17 × [Ni] −17 × [Cr] −21 × [Mo] (I )
In the above formula (I), Vf is the same average cooling rate as the production conditions for the high-strength steel plate in the first cooling step after separately performing the soaking step under the same conditions as the production conditions for the high-strength steel plate. Means the fraction of polygonal ferrite (area%) in the sample obtained by cooling to room temperature. Moreover, in said formula (I), [] has shown content (mass%) of each element, and content of the element which is not contained in a steel plate is calculated as 0 mass%.
Priority Applications (5)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/080,571 US20190085426A1 (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2017-02-08 | High strength steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor |
| MX2018010446A MX2018010446A (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2017-02-08 | High strength steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor. |
| EP17759588.1A EP3412786B1 (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2017-02-08 | High strength steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor |
| CN201780013822.5A CN108699653B (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2017-02-08 | High-strength steel sheet and method for producing same |
| KR1020187027683A KR102174562B1 (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2017-02-08 | High-strength steel sheet and its manufacturing method |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016-038304 | 2016-02-29 | ||
| JP2016038304 | 2016-02-29 | ||
| JP2016182966A JP6749818B2 (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2016-09-20 | High-strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same |
| JP2016-182966 | 2016-09-20 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2017150117A1 true WO2017150117A1 (en) | 2017-09-08 |
Family
ID=59743887
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/JP2017/004594 Ceased WO2017150117A1 (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2017-02-08 | High strength steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| WO (1) | WO2017150117A1 (en) |
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2020122213A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2020-08-13 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High strength galvanized steel sheet and method for producing the same |
| JP2022510873A (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2022-01-28 | アルセロールミタル | Cold-rolled heat-treated steel sheet and its manufacturing method |
| JPWO2022102218A1 (en) * | 2020-11-11 | 2022-05-19 | ||
| WO2022215389A1 (en) * | 2021-04-09 | 2022-10-13 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High-strength cold-rolled steel sheet and method for manufacturing same |
| US20230046327A1 (en) * | 2019-12-18 | 2023-02-16 | Posco | High strength steel sheet having superior workability and method for manufacturing same |
| JPWO2024057669A1 (en) * | 2022-09-15 | 2024-03-21 | ||
| WO2024057670A1 (en) * | 2022-09-15 | 2024-03-21 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Steel sheet, member, and methods for producing same |
| WO2024090011A1 (en) * | 2022-10-26 | 2024-05-02 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High-strength steel sheet, member, and manufacturing methods therefor |
| CN120945294A (en) * | 2025-10-17 | 2025-11-14 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | A cold-rolled continuously annealed CH steel with ultra-high hole expansion performance of 1000MPa and its preparation method |
| JP7811551B2 (ja) | 2020-11-11 | 2026-02-05 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | 鋼板およびその製造方法 |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003113442A (en) | 2001-10-05 | 2003-04-18 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | High tensile strength steel sheet with excellent warm formability |
| WO2013018741A1 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2013-02-07 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | High-strength steel sheet having excellent shape-retaining properties, high-strength zinc-plated steel sheet, and method for manufacturing same |
| JP2013040383A (en) * | 2011-08-17 | 2013-02-28 | Kobe Steel Ltd | High-strength steel sheet having excellent formability at room temperature and at warm temperature, and method for warm-forming the same |
| JP2013181184A (en) | 2012-02-29 | 2013-09-12 | Kobe Steel Ltd | High-strength steel sheet excellent in warm formability, and method of producing the same |
| JP5728115B1 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2015-06-03 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | High strength steel sheet excellent in ductility and low temperature toughness, and method for producing the same |
| WO2016080534A1 (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2016-05-26 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | High strength high ductility steel plate |
-
2017
- 2017-02-08 WO PCT/JP2017/004594 patent/WO2017150117A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2003113442A (en) | 2001-10-05 | 2003-04-18 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | High tensile strength steel sheet with excellent warm formability |
| WO2013018741A1 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2013-02-07 | 新日鐵住金株式会社 | High-strength steel sheet having excellent shape-retaining properties, high-strength zinc-plated steel sheet, and method for manufacturing same |
| JP2013040383A (en) * | 2011-08-17 | 2013-02-28 | Kobe Steel Ltd | High-strength steel sheet having excellent formability at room temperature and at warm temperature, and method for warm-forming the same |
| JP2013181184A (en) | 2012-02-29 | 2013-09-12 | Kobe Steel Ltd | High-strength steel sheet excellent in warm formability, and method of producing the same |
| JP5728115B1 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2015-06-03 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | High strength steel sheet excellent in ductility and low temperature toughness, and method for producing the same |
| WO2016080534A1 (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2016-05-26 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | High strength high ductility steel plate |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| ISIJ INT., vol. 33, no. 7, 1933, pages 776 |
| WANG CHAO ET AL.: "The Effect of Intercritical Annealing on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties in a High Strength TRIP Steel with C-Partitioning", STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, vol. 85, no. 3, 2014, pages 388 - 394, XP055601663 * |
| WILLIAM C. LESLIE: "The Physical Metallurgy of Steels", 31 May 1985, MARUZEN CO., LTD., pages: 273 |
Cited By (21)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2022510873A (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2022-01-28 | アルセロールミタル | Cold-rolled heat-treated steel sheet and its manufacturing method |
| JP7213978B2 (en) | 2018-12-18 | 2023-01-27 | アルセロールミタル | Cold-rolled heat-treated steel sheet and its manufacturing method |
| JP7056631B2 (en) | 2019-01-29 | 2022-04-19 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and its manufacturing method |
| JP2020122213A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2020-08-13 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High strength galvanized steel sheet and method for producing the same |
| US20230046327A1 (en) * | 2019-12-18 | 2023-02-16 | Posco | High strength steel sheet having superior workability and method for manufacturing same |
| KR20230084534A (en) * | 2020-11-11 | 2023-06-13 | 닛폰세이테츠 가부시키가이샤 | Steel plate and its manufacturing method |
| JPWO2022102218A1 (en) * | 2020-11-11 | 2022-05-19 | ||
| WO2022102218A1 (en) * | 2020-11-11 | 2022-05-19 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | Steel sheet and method for producing same |
| JP7811551B2 (ja) | 2020-11-11 | 2026-02-05 | 日本製鉄株式会社 | 鋼板およびその製造方法 |
| KR102884952B1 (en) | 2020-11-11 | 2025-11-13 | 닛폰세이테츠 가부시키가이샤 | Steel plate and method for manufacturing the same |
| WO2022215389A1 (en) * | 2021-04-09 | 2022-10-13 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High-strength cold-rolled steel sheet and method for manufacturing same |
| JP7276618B2 (en) | 2021-04-09 | 2023-05-18 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High-strength cold-rolled steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof |
| JPWO2022215389A1 (en) * | 2021-04-09 | 2022-10-13 | ||
| JPWO2024057669A1 (en) * | 2022-09-15 | 2024-03-21 | ||
| WO2024057669A1 (en) * | 2022-09-15 | 2024-03-21 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Steel sheet, member, and method for manufacturing the foregoing |
| WO2024057670A1 (en) * | 2022-09-15 | 2024-03-21 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Steel sheet, member, and methods for producing same |
| JP7485240B1 (en) * | 2022-09-15 | 2024-05-16 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Steel plates, components and their manufacturing methods |
| JP7559978B2 (en) | 2022-09-15 | 2024-10-02 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | Steel plates, components and their manufacturing methods |
| WO2024090011A1 (en) * | 2022-10-26 | 2024-05-02 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High-strength steel sheet, member, and manufacturing methods therefor |
| JP7522978B1 (en) * | 2022-10-26 | 2024-07-26 | Jfeスチール株式会社 | High-strength steel plates, components and their manufacturing methods |
| CN120945294A (en) * | 2025-10-17 | 2025-11-14 | 鞍钢股份有限公司 | A cold-rolled continuously annealed CH steel with ultra-high hole expansion performance of 1000MPa and its preparation method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| KR102174562B1 (en) | High-strength steel sheet and its manufacturing method | |
| JP5632904B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet with excellent workability | |
| KR101795328B1 (en) | High-strength steel sheet having excellent processability and low-temperature toughness, and method for producing same | |
| JP5728115B1 (en) | High strength steel sheet excellent in ductility and low temperature toughness, and method for producing the same | |
| KR101265427B1 (en) | High-strength cold-rolled steel sheet excellent in workability and method for manufacturing the same | |
| JP5365216B2 (en) | High-strength steel sheet and its manufacturing method | |
| US9200343B2 (en) | High strength steel sheet and method for manufacturing the same | |
| CN104838027B (en) | High tensile steel plate and manufacture method thereof | |
| KR101604963B1 (en) | High-strength steel sheet with excellent workability and manufacturing method therefor | |
| WO2017150117A1 (en) | High strength steel sheet and manufacturing method therefor | |
| JP5157146B2 (en) | Hot-dip galvanized steel sheet | |
| KR101753510B1 (en) | High strength steel sheet having high young's modulus and method for manufacturing the same | |
| KR20190045277A (en) | High Strength Steel Sheet and Manufacturing Method Thereof | |
| JP5685167B2 (en) | High-strength steel sheet with excellent workability and method for producing the same | |
| JP2017057472A (en) | Hot rolled steel sheet and production method therefor | |
| JP2019173156A (en) | High strength steel sheet and high strength galvanized steel sheet | |
| JP5685166B2 (en) | High-strength steel sheet with excellent workability and method for producing the same | |
| KR20230059816A (en) | High-strength cold-rolled steel sheet, hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, and manufacturing method thereof |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: MX/A/2018/010446 Country of ref document: MX |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2017759588 Country of ref document: EP |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2017759588 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20180906 |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20187027683 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 17759588 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |