[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2015081372A2 - Heap leaching - Google Patents

Heap leaching Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015081372A2
WO2015081372A2 PCT/AU2014/001092 AU2014001092W WO2015081372A2 WO 2015081372 A2 WO2015081372 A2 WO 2015081372A2 AU 2014001092 W AU2014001092 W AU 2014001092W WO 2015081372 A2 WO2015081372 A2 WO 2015081372A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
fragments
electromagnetic radiation
method defined
ore
heap
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/AU2014/001092
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2015081372A3 (en
Inventor
Lucy Esdaile
Samuel Kingman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Technological Resources Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
Technological Resources Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2013904659A external-priority patent/AU2013904659A0/en
Application filed by Technological Resources Pty Ltd filed Critical Technological Resources Pty Ltd
Publication of WO2015081372A2 publication Critical patent/WO2015081372A2/en
Publication of WO2015081372A3 publication Critical patent/WO2015081372A3/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/14Agglomerating; Briquetting; Binding; Granulating
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B15/00Obtaining copper
    • C22B15/0002Preliminary treatment
    • C22B15/0004Preliminary treatment without modification of the copper constituent
    • C22B15/0006Preliminary treatment without modification of the copper constituent by dry processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B3/00Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
    • C22B3/04Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to leaching a material containing a valuable metal.
  • the present invention relates particularly, although by no means exclusively, to l eaching a material in the form of a sulphidic ore containing a valuable metal.
  • the present invention relates particularly, although by no means exclusively, to leaching a sulphidic copper-containing ore that includes copper-containing minerals.
  • heap leaching provides lower metal recoveries than other metallurgical process options for recovering copper from copper-containing ores, such as milling and flotation that produces copper- containing concentrates that are then smelted to produce copper metal. Consequently, heap leaching tends to be reserved for low grade ore types that, have at least a proportion of readily recovered copper, but where crushing/milling costs per unit of copper (or copper equivalent - i.e. when Caking into account by-product credits from, for example, gold and silver ⁇ are too high to support a concentrator approach, or where mineral liberation and other characteristics (e.g. arsenic content) will not support production of directly useable or saleable concentrates.
  • Standard best industry practice is to use agglomerates of rained and thereafter crushed ore in heaps.
  • the mined ore is processed through multiple crushing steps, namely primary and secondary crushing steps and in some instances tertiary crushing steps, and the crushed ore is agglomerated in an agglomeration step, typically with the use of an. acid as a binder.
  • the applicant through a group company, has carried out research and development work, on heap leaching copper-containing ores that include copper- containing mi nerals (such as ehalcopyrite) and has made a number of findings in the course of this heap leaching work and in the course of work on other technology projects.
  • the present in vention is an outcome of those findings.
  • the invention provides a method of agglomerating mined ore for use in a heap leaching process which includes exposing ore fragments to
  • the invention provides a method of agglomerating mined ore for use in. a heap leaching process which includes the steps of:
  • step (b ⁇ agglomerating fragments after exposure to electromagnetic radiation in step (a), with agglomeration step (b) including mixing fragments so that fragments that have fractures break down into smaller fragments and these smaller fragments subsequently form agglomerates during the agglomeration step.
  • the method provides an opportunity to use energy required for the
  • agglomeration step to break down fractured fragments from the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a). This provides an opportunity to avoid secondary and tertiary crushing (assuming tertiary crushing would be otherwise required) of mined ore prior to agglomeration step (h) and to reduce the overall energy requirements to produce agglomerates from mined ore.
  • the method also makes it possible to take larger fragments into the agglomeration step - this is a considerable advantage in terms of upstream materials handling of fragments.
  • fragment is understood herein to mean any suitable size of mined material, having regard to materials handling and processing capabilities of the apparatus used to carry out. the method. It is also noted that the term “fragment” as used herein may be understood by some persons skilled in the art to be better described as “particles”. The intention is to use both, terms as synonyms.
  • the term “mined” ore is understood herein to include metalliferous material and non-metalliferous material. Iron-containing and copper-containing ores are examples of metalliferous material. Coal is an example of a non-metalliferous material.
  • the term “mined " ' ore is understood herein to include, hut is not limited to, (a) run-of-mine material and (h) run-of-mine material that has been subjected to at least primary crushing or similar size reduction after the material has been mined and prior to being sorted.
  • the term “mined” material includes mined material that is in stockpiles.
  • the smaller fragments may form agglomerates with other smaller fragments in agglomeration step (b).
  • the smaller fragments may form agglomerates with other fragments in agglomeration step (b).
  • the agglomeration step (b) may include simultaneously mixing and
  • the agglomeration step (b) may include mixing fragments in one step and then agglomerating the mixed fragments in a subsequent step. There may be overlap between the mixing and agglomeration steps.
  • the method may include crushing mined ore prior to processing the crushed mined ore in the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a).
  • the method may include crushing mined ore in a primary crushing step prior to processing the crushed mined ore in the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a).
  • primary crushing is understood herein to mean crushing ore to a top size of 250 to 150 mm in the case of copper-containing ores where the copper is in the form of sulphides. It is noted that the top size may he different for ores containing different valuable metals.
  • second crushing is understood, herein to mean crushing ore to a top size of 50 to 20 mm in the case of copper-containing ores where the copper is in the form of sulphides, it is noted that the top size may he different for ores containing, different valuable metals..
  • tertiary crushing is understood herein to mean, crushing ore to a top size of 15 to 5 mm in the case of copper-containing ores where the copper is in the form of sulphides, It is noted that the top size may he different for ores containing different valuable metals.
  • the method may include separating crushed, ore into at least two fractions based on fragment size prior to the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) and supplying one of the fractions to step (a).
  • One fraction may be a coarse fraction and another fraction may be a fines fraction.
  • coarse fraction and another fraction may be a fines fraction.
  • fine fraction refer to “oversize” and “undersize” respectively in relation to a screen.
  • the split could occur in a range of 12 to 50mm. Typically, the split is 25 mm in the case of the copper mining sector.
  • the split may be any suitable size depending on factors as the ore type and the downstream processing requirements.
  • the method may include processing the coarse fraction in electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) and forming a fractured coarse fraction.
  • the method may include supplying the fines fraction and the fractured coarse fraction produced in step (a) to the agglomeration step (b).
  • the ore may be a copper-containing ore.
  • the ore may be a copper-containing ore that includes copper-containing minerals.
  • the ore may be any suitable ore containing a valuable metal.
  • Nickel is another example of a valuable metal.
  • the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) may be selected to form fractures in fragments without causing significant breakdown of fragments into smaller fragments. From a materials handling viewpoint, it is preferable to have minimal breakdown of fragments between the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) and the agglomeration step (b) ⁇
  • the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) may be selected to form fractures in fragments with, minimal breakdown of the fragments into smaller fragments.
  • the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) may be selected to form fractures in fragments without causing breakdown of more than 25%, typically no more than 15%, more typically no more than 10%, by weight of the fragments into smaller fragments.
  • the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) may be selected to form fractures that ultimately result in a preferred particle size distribution of fragments for forming agglomerates that have required characteristics, such as porosity and/or mechanical strength, for heap leaching.
  • the electromagnetic radiation may be selected to be high power density.
  • the power density applied in step (a) may be selected to be at least 1 x 10 ! l> W/nf, typically at least 1 x 1.0 50 W/m 3 , and more typically at least 1 x 10 J ' W/m 3 .
  • the electromagnetic radiation exposure times may be selected to be very short exposure times.
  • the exposure time applied in step (a) may be less than Is, typically less than 0.5s, more typically less than. 0.1s, more typically less than 0.05s.
  • the electromagnetic radiation may be continuous radiation, and step (a) may include moving ore fragments through an electromagnetic radiation exposure space at a rate to provide a required exposure time.
  • the electromagnetic radiation may be pulsed radiation, and step (a) may include moving ore fragments through an electromagnetic radiation exposure space at a rate to provide a required exposure time.
  • the electromagnetic radiation may be any suitable radiation.
  • the electromagnetic radiation may be microwave radiation.
  • the microwave radiation may have any suitable wavelength in the range of 300 MHz - 300 GHz, 500 MHz - 30 GHz or 600 MHz - 3 GHz, for example 2450 MHz or 915 MHz.
  • the electromagnetic radiation may be radio frequency radiation.
  • the invention also provides agglomerates formed, in the above-described method of aggl omerating mined ore.
  • the invention also provides a heap of material, with the material including agglomerates formed in the above-described, method of agglomerating mined ore.
  • the invention also includes a method of heap leaching that includes:
  • the method may also include recovering the leached metal as a metal product.
  • this step includes recovering the leached metal from solution in pregnant leach liquor.
  • the method of agglomerating mined ore illustrated in the Figure is sui table for forming standard heaps m terms of the basic shape and size of the heaps. More specifically, the present invention does not extend to particular shapes and sizes of heaps and to particular methods of constructing heaps from agglomerated ore.
  • the heap may he a heap of the type described in International publication WO2012/031317 in the name of the applicant and the disclosure in the International publication is incorporated herein by cross -reference,
  • run ⁇ of-min.e copper-containing ore is crushed in a primary crusher 3, and the crushed ore fragments are transferred to a screen.5 and separated into a coarse -fraction 7 of at least 25 mm and a fines fraction 9 of less than 25 mm.
  • the fines fraction 9 is supplied to an agglomeration station 1 1 ,
  • the coarse fraction 7 is supplied to an electromagnetic radiation treatment station 13.
  • The- station 13 may be any suitable construction.
  • the station 13 may be of the type described in International publication. WO2014/066941. in the name of the applicant and the disclosure in the International publication is incorporated herein by cross-reference.
  • the coarse fragments are exposed to high power density radio frequency radiation (or any other suitable electromagnetic radiation) at the station. 13.
  • the operating conditions, including frequency, residence (i.e. exposure) time, and power density, etc. are selected so that fractures (i.e. cracks) form in the coarse fragments, preferably with minimal break down into smaller fragments at this point.
  • the operating conditions are selected so that fractures form in. the coarse fragments without causing any more than .1.0% by weight of the fragments to break down at this point into smaller fragments.
  • the selection of the operating conditions at the station 13 is dependent on the downstream agglomeration requirements and operating conditions for the agglomeration step. In some situations it may be preferred to cause extensive cracking of the fragments. For example, it may be preferred to cause significant fracturing of all of the fragments. In other situations, it may be preferred to cause fracturing of a proportion of the fragments. The proportion may be fragments t hat, hav e particular characteristics, such as a copper concentration above a threshold
  • Structural alteration, i.e, fracturing, of the fragments at the station 13 may be the result of differences in thermal expansion of minerals within fragments, as a
  • the fragments from the electromagnetic radiation treatment station 13 are supplied to the agglomeration station 11.
  • the agglomeration station 11 may be any suitable construction that includes a drum (or other device) for mixing the fragments and. agglomerating the fragments during the agglomeration step, The mixing conditions are selected to cause fragments that have fractures to break down, into smaller fragments in the mixing drum. These smaller fragments subsequently form agglomerates with other smaller fragments and fines during the agglomeration step.
  • the agglomeration step may include the addition of a suitable hinder, such as an acid.
  • the mixing and agglomeration may occur simultaneously. Alternatively, mixing may be carried out first and agglomeration (for example initiated by the addition of a binder) may be carried out after mixing has been completed to a required extent
  • the mixing may include subjecting fragments to impact forces that cause breaking of at least a portion of the fractured fragments.
  • International application PCT/AU2014/000648 in the name of the applicant describes an apparatus for subjecting fragments to impact forces and the disclosure in the specification of the International application is incorporated herein by cross-reference.
  • the agglomerates produced, in the agglomeration station 1 1 are transferred via a conveyor 1.5 (or any other suitable materials transfer option) to a heap site (not shown) for use in the construction of a heap on the site.
  • the method provides an opportunity to use energy that is required in any event for agglomerating fragments in the agglomeration step (b) to break down fractured fragments from the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a). This provides an opportunity to avoid secondary and tertiary crashing (assuming tertiary crushing would be otherwise required) of mined ore prior to agglomeration s tep (b) and consequently to reduce the overall energy requirements to produce agglomerates from mined ore.
  • the method also makes it possible to take larger fragments into the agglomeration step - this is a considerable advantage in terms of upstream materials handling of fragments.
  • the embodiment is described as a series of successive steps with fragments from the electromagnetic radiation station 13 being transferred directly to the agglomeration station 13 and thereafter directly to form a heap.
  • the invention is not limi ted to this embodiment and there may be stockpiling of fragments and agglomerates after each of the stations 13, 1.1.
  • the stations I 3 ? 11 and the heap may not be located in the same area and it may be necessary to transport fragments and agglomerates between stations and heaps that are in different locations.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Disintegrating Or Milling (AREA)

Abstract

A method of agglomerating mined ore for use in a heap leaching process includes exposing ore fragments to electromagnetic radiation and causing fractures to form in the fragments and thereafter agglomerating fragments.

Description

HEAP LEACHING
TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to leaching a material containing a valuable metal.
The present invention relates particularly, although by no means exclusively, to l eaching a material in the form of a sulphidic ore containing a valuable metal.
The present invention relates particularly, although by no means exclusively, to leaching a sulphidic copper-containing ore that includes copper-containing minerals.
BACKGROUND ART
In convention al heap and dump leaching of copper sulphide containing minerals, mined ore is stacked into heaps, aerated through direct injection of air via aeration pipes extending into the heap and/or by natural convection through exposed sides of the heap, irrigated with an acid solution for extraction of copper into solution, and the copper is subsequently recovered from solution by a range of recover}' options including solvent extraction and electrowinning (SX/EW "), cementation onto more active metals such as iron, hydrogen reduction, and direct electrowinning. Leaching may be enhanced by the use of microorganisms.
Generally, heap and dump leaching (hereinafter referred, to as "heap leaching") provides lower metal recoveries than other metallurgical process options for recovering copper from copper-containing ores, such as milling and flotation that produces copper- containing concentrates that are then smelted to produce copper metal. Consequently, heap leaching tends to be reserved for low grade ore types that, have at least a proportion of readily recovered copper, but where crushing/milling costs per unit of copper (or copper equivalent - i.e. when Caking into account by-product credits from, for example, gold and silver} are too high to support a concentrator approach, or where mineral liberation and other characteristics (e.g. arsenic content) will not support production of directly useable or saleable concentrates.
Standard best industry practice is to use agglomerates of rained and thereafter crushed ore in heaps. Typically, the mined ore is processed through multiple crushing steps, namely primary and secondary crushing steps and in some instances tertiary crushing steps, and the crushed ore is agglomerated in an agglomeration step, typically with the use of an. acid as a binder.
A substantial amount of energy is required in the crushing steps, and this energy use is a significant concern. However, the industry view is thai the use of agglomerates in heaps has advantages over the use of ore in an imaggloinerafed form, in heaps from operational and valuable metal recovery perspecti ves and thai these advantages outweigh energy cost considerations. In particular, the ore preparation steps of crushing and. agglomeration make it possible to pre-condition material, to a desired leaching pH and provide structural integrity and good liquor permeability within a heap.
The above description is equally applicable to oilier materials containing other valuable metals, such as by way of example, nickel.
The above description, is not to be taken as an admission of the common general knowledge in Australia or elsewhere.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
The applicant, through a group company, has carried out research and development work, on heap leaching copper-containing ores that include copper- containing mi nerals (such as ehalcopyrite) and has made a number of findings in the course of this heap leaching work and in the course of work on other technology projects. The present in vention is an outcome of those findings.
In general terms the invention provides a method of agglomerating mined ore for use in a heap leaching process which includes exposing ore fragments to
electromagnetic radiation and causing fractures to form in the fragments and thereafter agglomerating fragments.
The invention provides a method of agglomerating mined ore for use in. a heap leaching process which includes the steps of:
{ a } exposing ore fragments to electromagnetic radiation and causing fractures to form in the fragments; and
(b } agglomerating fragments after exposure to electromagnetic radiation in step (a), with agglomeration step (b) including mixing fragments so that fragments that have fractures break down into smaller fragments and these smaller fragments subsequently form agglomerates during the agglomeration step.
The method provides an opportunity to use energy required for the
agglomeration step to break down fractured fragments from the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a). This provides an opportunity to avoid secondary and tertiary crushing (assuming tertiary crushing would be otherwise required) of mined ore prior to agglomeration step (h) and to reduce the overall energy requirements to produce agglomerates from mined ore. The method also makes it possible to take larger fragments into the agglomeration step - this is a considerable advantage in terms of upstream materials handling of fragments.
The term "fragment" is understood herein to mean any suitable size of mined material, having regard to materials handling and processing capabilities of the apparatus used to carry out. the method. It is also noted that the term "fragment" as used herein may be understood by some persons skilled in the art to be better described as "particles". The intention is to use both, terms as synonyms.
The term "mined" ore is understood herein to include metalliferous material and non-metalliferous material. Iron-containing and copper-containing ores are examples of metalliferous material. Coal is an example of a non-metalliferous material. The term "mined"' ore is understood herein to include, hut is not limited to, (a) run-of-mine material and (h) run-of-mine material that has been subjected to at least primary crushing or similar size reduction after the material has been mined and prior to being sorted. The term "mined" material includes mined material that is in stockpiles.
The smaller fragments may form agglomerates with other smaller fragments in agglomeration step (b).
The smaller fragments may form agglomerates with other fragments in agglomeration step (b).
The agglomeration step (b) may include simultaneously mixing and
agglomerating fragments.
The agglomeration step (b) may include mixing fragments in one step and then agglomerating the mixed fragments in a subsequent step. There may be overlap between the mixing and agglomeration steps. The method may include crushing mined ore prior to processing the crushed mined ore in the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a).
The method may include crushing mined ore in a primary crushing step prior to processing the crushed mined ore in the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a).
The term "primary crushing" is understood herein to mean crushing ore to a top size of 250 to 150 mm in the case of copper-containing ores where the copper is in the form of sulphides. It is noted that the top size may he different for ores containing different valuable metals.
The term "secondary crushing" is understood, herein to mean crushing ore to a top size of 50 to 20 mm in the case of copper-containing ores where the copper is in the form of sulphides, it is noted that the top size may he different for ores containing, different valuable metals..
The term "tertiary crushing" is understood herein to mean, crushing ore to a top size of 15 to 5 mm in the case of copper-containing ores where the copper is in the form of sulphides, It is noted that the top size may he different for ores containing different valuable metals.
The method may include separating crushed, ore into at least two fractions based on fragment size prior to the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) and supplying one of the fractions to step (a).
One fraction may be a coarse fraction and another fraction may be a fines fraction. In the context of a size separation step, for example using a screen, "coarse" and "fine" refer to "oversize" and "undersize" respectively in relation to a screen. The split could occur in a range of 12 to 50mm. Typically, the split is 25 mm in the case of the copper mining sector. The split may be any suitable size depending on factors as the ore type and the downstream processing requirements.
The method may include processing the coarse fraction in electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) and forming a fractured coarse fraction.
The method may include supplying the fines fraction and the fractured coarse fraction produced in step (a) to the agglomeration step (b).
The ore may be a copper-containing ore.
The ore may be a copper-containing ore that includes copper-containing minerals. The ore may be any suitable ore containing a valuable metal. Nickel is another example of a valuable metal.
The operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) may be selected to form fractures in fragments without causing significant breakdown of fragments into smaller fragments. From a materials handling viewpoint, it is preferable to have minimal breakdown of fragments between the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) and the agglomeration step (b)<
By way of example, the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) may be selected to form fractures in fragments with, minimal breakdown of the fragments into smaller fragments.
By way of example, the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) may be selected to form fractures in fragments without causing breakdown of more than 25%, typically no more than 15%, more typically no more than 10%, by weight of the fragments into smaller fragments.
The operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) may be selected to form fractures that ultimately result in a preferred particle size distribution of fragments for forming agglomerates that have required characteristics, such as porosity and/or mechanical strength, for heap leaching.
The electromagnetic radiation may be selected to be high power density. For example, the power density applied in step (a) may be selected to be at least 1 x 10! l> W/nf, typically at least 1 x 1.050 W/m3, and more typically at least 1 x 10J ' W/m3.
The electromagnetic radiation exposure times may be selected to be very short exposure times. By way of further example, the exposure time applied in step (a) may be less than Is, typically less than 0.5s, more typically less than. 0.1s, more typically less than 0.05s.
The electromagnetic radiation may be continuous radiation, and step (a) may include moving ore fragments through an electromagnetic radiation exposure space at a rate to provide a required exposure time.
The electromagnetic radiation may be pulsed radiation, and step (a) may include moving ore fragments through an electromagnetic radiation exposure space at a rate to provide a required exposure time.
The electromagnetic radiation may be any suitable radiation. For example, the electromagnetic radiation may be microwave radiation. The microwave radiation may have any suitable wavelength in the range of 300 MHz - 300 GHz, 500 MHz - 30 GHz or 600 MHz - 3 GHz, for example 2450 MHz or 915 MHz.
By way of further example, the electromagnetic radiation may be radio frequency radiation.
The invention also provides agglomerates formed, in the above-described method of aggl omerating mined ore.
The invention also provides a heap of material, with the material including agglomerates formed in the above-described, method of agglomerating mined ore.
The invention also includes a method of heap leaching that includes:
( a ) forming a heap of material, with the material including agglomerates formed in. the above-described method of agglomerating mined ore; and
(b ) leaching valuable metal from the ore in the heap.
The method may also include recovering the leached metal as a metal product. Typically, this step includes recovering the leached metal from solution in pregnant leach liquor.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The present invention is described further with reference to the accompanying drawing which illustrates the steps in one embodiment of a method of agglomerating mined ore for use in a heap leaching process in accordance with the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT
The method of agglomerating mined ore illustrated in the Figure is described in the context of copper-containing ore. However, it is understood that the invention is not limited to this type of ore and extends to mined ore generally. Other examples of a mined ore are nickel-containing ores.
The method of agglomerating mined ore illustrated in the Figure is sui table for forming standard heaps m terms of the basic shape and size of the heaps. More specifically, the present invention does not extend to particular shapes and sizes of heaps and to particular methods of constructing heaps from agglomerated ore. By way of example only, the heap may he a heap of the type described in International publication WO2012/031317 in the name of the applicant and the disclosure in the International publication is incorporated herein by cross -reference,
With, reference to the drawing, run~of-min.e copper-containing ore is crushed in a primary crusher 3, and the crushed ore fragments are transferred to a screen.5 and separated into a coarse -fraction 7 of at least 25 mm and a fines fraction 9 of less than 25 mm.
The fines fraction 9 is supplied to an agglomeration station 1 1 ,
The coarse fraction 7 is supplied to an electromagnetic radiation treatment station 13. The- station 13 may be any suitable construction. By way of example, the station 13 may be of the type described in International publication. WO2014/066941. in the name of the applicant and the disclosure in the International publication is incorporated herein by cross-reference. The coarse fragments are exposed to high power density radio frequency radiation (or any other suitable electromagnetic radiation) at the station. 13. The operating conditions, including frequency, residence (i.e. exposure) time, and power density, etc. are selected so that fractures (i.e. cracks) form in the coarse fragments, preferably with minimal break down into smaller fragments at this point. Typically, the operating conditions are selected so that fractures form in. the coarse fragments without causing any more than .1.0% by weight of the fragments to break down at this point into smaller fragments.
In any given situation, the selection of the operating conditions at the station 13 is dependent on the downstream agglomeration requirements and operating conditions for the agglomeration step. In some situations it may be preferred to cause extensive cracking of the fragments. For example, it may be preferred to cause significant fracturing of all of the fragments. In other situations, it may be preferred to cause fracturing of a proportion of the fragments. The proportion may be fragments t hat, hav e particular characteristics, such as a copper concentration above a threshold
concentration. In other situations, less extreme structural alteration of the fragments may be sufficient It. is noted that the actual extent to which individual fragments will be altered structurally will vary depending on the mineralogy of individual fragments. In some situations, it may be preferred to form fractures that ultimately result in a preferred particle size distribution of .fragments for .forming, agglomerates that have required characteristics, such as porosity and/or mechartieal. strength, for heap leaching.
Structural alteration, i.e, fracturing, of the fragments at the station 13 may be the result of differences in thermal expansion of minerals within fragments, as a
consequence of heating of minerals due to exposure to electromagnetic radiation, resulting in regions of high stress/strain within the fragments and leading to cracking or other physical changes within the fragments.
The fragments from the electromagnetic radiation treatment station 13 are supplied to the agglomeration station 11. The agglomeration station 11 may be any suitable construction that includes a drum (or other device) for mixing the fragments and. agglomerating the fragments during the agglomeration step, The mixing conditions are selected to cause fragments that have fractures to break down, into smaller fragments in the mixing drum. These smaller fragments subsequently form agglomerates with other smaller fragments and fines during the agglomeration step. The agglomeration step may include the addition of a suitable hinder, such as an acid. The mixing and agglomeration may occur simultaneously. Alternatively, mixing may be carried out first and agglomeration (for example initiated by the addition of a binder) may be carried out after mixing has been completed to a required extent
In a situation where the mixing is carried out separately, the mixing may include subjecting fragments to impact forces that cause breaking of at least a portion of the fractured fragments. International application PCT/AU2014/000648 in the name of the applicant describes an apparatus for subjecting fragments to impact forces and the disclosure in the specification of the International application is incorporated herein by cross-reference.
The agglomerates produced, in the agglomeration station 1 1 are transferred via a conveyor 1.5 (or any other suitable materials transfer option) to a heap site (not shown) for use in the construction of a heap on the site.
The method provides an opportunity to use energy that is required in any event for agglomerating fragments in the agglomeration step (b) to break down fractured fragments from the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a). This provides an opportunity to avoid secondary and tertiary crashing (assuming tertiary crushing would be otherwise required) of mined ore prior to agglomeration s tep (b) and consequently to reduce the overall energy requirements to produce agglomerates from mined ore. The method also makes it possible to take larger fragments into the agglomeration step - this is a considerable advantage in terms of upstream materials handling of fragments.
Many modifications may be made to the embodiments of the present invention described above without departing from the spirit, and scope of the invention.
By way of example, the embodiment is described as a series of successive steps with fragments from the electromagnetic radiation station 13 being transferred directly to the agglomeration station 13 and thereafter directly to form a heap. The invention is not limi ted to this embodiment and there may be stockpiling of fragments and agglomerates after each of the stations 13, 1.1. In addition, the stations I 3? 11 and the heap may not be located in the same area and it may be necessary to transport fragments and agglomerates between stations and heaps that are in different locations.

Claims

I . A method of agglomerating mined ore for use in a heap leaching process which includes the steps of:
(a) exposing ore fragments to eiectromagnetic radiation and causing fractures to form m the .fragments; and
(b) agglomerating fragments after exposure to electromagnetic radiation, in Step (a), with agglomeration step (b) including mixing fragments so that fragments that have fractures break down into smaller fragments and these smaller fragments subsequently form, agglomerates during the agglomeration step.
2. The method defined in claim I wherein the agglomeration step (b) includes simultaneously mixing and agglomerating fragments,
3. The method defined in claim 1 wherein the agglomeration step (b) includes mixing fragments in one step and agglomerating the mixed fragments in a separate step.
4. The method, defined in any one of the preceding claims includes crashing mined ore in a primary crushing step and processing the crushed ore in the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a).
5. The method defined in. any one of the preceding claims includes separating crashed ore into at least two fractions based on fragment size prior to the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a), with one fraction being a coarse fraction and another fraction being a fines fraction.
6. The method defined in claim 5 includes processing the coarse fraction in the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a),
7. The method defined in claim.6 includes supplying the fines fraction and the fractured coarse fraction produced in step fa) to the agglomeration step (b).
8. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the ore is a. copper-containing ore thai, includes copper-containing minerals.
9. The method defined in any one of the preceding c laims wherein the electromagnetic radiation is microwave radiation or radio frequency radiation,
1.0. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) are selected to form, fractures in fragments without causing significant breakdown of fragments into smaller fragments.
1 1. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) are selected to form, fractures in fragments with minimal breakdown of the fragments into smaller fragments,
12. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) are selected to form fractures in fragments without causing breakdown of more than 25%, typically no more than 1.5%, more typically no more than 10%, by weight of the fragmen ts into smaller fragments.
13. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the operating conditions for the electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) are selected to form fractures that ultimately result in a preferred particle size distribution of fragments for forming agglomerates that have required characteristics, such as porosity and/or mechanical strength, for heap leaching.
14. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the electromagnetic radiation is selected to he high power density and the exposure times are selected to be very short exposure times.
15. The method defined in claim. 1.4 wherein the power density applied in electromagnetic radiation, exposure step (a) is selected, to be at least 1 x 10* W/mv\
16. The method defined in claim 14 wherein the power density applied in electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) is selected to be at least 1 x 10!0 W/nr,
17. The method defined in claim. 14 wherein the power density is selected to he at least 1 x 10u W/m'.
1.8. The method defined in any one of claims .14 to 17 wherein the exposure time in electromagnetic radiation exposure step (a) is less than I s.
19. The method defined in any one of claims 14 to 18 wherein, the exposure time is less than 0.05s.
20. Agglomerates formed in the method defined in any one of the preceding claims.
21. A heap of material, with the material including agglomerates formed hi the method of agglomerating mined ore defined in .anyone of the preceding claims.
22. A method of heap leaching thai includes:
(a) forming a heap of material, with the material including agglomerates formed in the method of agglom erating mined ore defined in any one of claims 1-20; and
(b) leaching valuable metal from the ore in the heap.
23. The method defined in claim 22 includes recovering the leached metal as a metal product.
PCT/AU2014/001092 2013-12-02 2014-12-02 Heap leaching Ceased WO2015081372A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2013904659A AU2013904659A0 (en) 2013-12-02 Heap Leaching
AU2013904659 2013-12-02

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015081372A2 true WO2015081372A2 (en) 2015-06-11
WO2015081372A3 WO2015081372A3 (en) 2015-10-15

Family

ID=53274225

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU2014/001092 Ceased WO2015081372A2 (en) 2013-12-02 2014-12-02 Heap leaching

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2015081372A2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017070747A1 (en) * 2015-10-30 2017-05-04 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Heap leaching
US10526685B2 (en) 2015-10-30 2020-01-07 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Heap leaching
US10563287B2 (en) 2017-04-06 2020-02-18 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Leaching copper-containing ores
US10563284B2 (en) 2018-05-09 2020-02-18 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Leaching copper-containing ores
WO2020041914A1 (en) * 2018-08-28 2020-03-05 Platinum Group Chile Spa System and method for solubilising in an aqueous medium elements contained in a sulfide ore concentrate

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2134977A1 (en) * 1971-07-13 1973-01-25 Atsukawa Masami Solid state iron prodn from powder or granule ore - by high intensity alternating current resistance heating
JPH07268494A (en) * 1994-03-29 1995-10-17 Nippon Steel Corp Method of agglomeration of ore by microwave irradiation
US6277168B1 (en) * 2000-02-14 2001-08-21 Xiaodi Huang Method for direct metal making by microwave energy
WO2010025519A1 (en) * 2008-09-04 2010-03-11 The University Of Queensland Method and apparatus for separating clay from ore fragments
US8252084B2 (en) * 2009-04-15 2012-08-28 Phoenix Environmental Reclamation Separator and crusher of minerals with microwave energy and method thereof
CA2854865A1 (en) * 2011-11-08 2013-05-16 Technological Resources Pty Limited A method for the treatment of ore material

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017070747A1 (en) * 2015-10-30 2017-05-04 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Heap leaching
US10526685B2 (en) 2015-10-30 2020-01-07 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Heap leaching
CN114410983A (en) * 2015-10-30 2022-04-29 技术资源有限公司 Heap leaching
US10563287B2 (en) 2017-04-06 2020-02-18 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Leaching copper-containing ores
USRE50227E1 (en) 2017-04-06 2024-12-03 Technological Resources Pty Limited Leaching copper-containing ores
US10563284B2 (en) 2018-05-09 2020-02-18 Technological Resources Pty. Limited Leaching copper-containing ores
WO2020041914A1 (en) * 2018-08-28 2020-03-05 Platinum Group Chile Spa System and method for solubilising in an aqueous medium elements contained in a sulfide ore concentrate
US12098443B2 (en) 2018-08-28 2024-09-24 Platinum Group Chile Spa System and method for solubilising in an aqueous medium elements contained in a sulfide ore concentrate
AU2019330759B2 (en) * 2018-08-28 2024-12-19 Platinum Group Chile Spa System and method for solubilising in an aqueous medium elements contained in a sulfide ore concentrate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2015081372A3 (en) 2015-10-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Amar et al. Waste rock reprocessing to enhance the sustainability of phosphate reserves: A critical review
Quast et al. Preconcentration strategies in the processing of nickel laterite ores Part 1: Literature review
EP3133177B1 (en) Wet-mode nickel oxide ore smelting method
WO2015081372A2 (en) Heap leaching
JP7273254B2 (en) Metal recovery from metal-bearing materials
CN107971123B (en) Dressing and smelting method of iron coated mixed copper ore
CN111085336B (en) Method for recycling iron raw material and tail slag from rotary kiln slag without harm
CN103146911A (en) Beneficiation method for treating combined copper oxide ore and recovering associated valuable metals
JP6969262B2 (en) Hydrometallurgical method for nickel oxide ore
CN109701737B (en) Beneficiation method for comprehensively recovering magnetite from cyanidation tailings
EP2669392B1 (en) Process for production of ore slurry
EP2226403B1 (en) Method of concentrating nickel in saprolite ore
CN114410983A (en) Heap leaching
US20170145543A1 (en) Manganese Ore Beneficiation Process
CN108339672B (en) Process method for recovering potassium feldspar in potassium-rich slate
CN104611541B (en) A kind of method leaching rare earth in iron selection tailings
CN102888520A (en) Method for efficiently extracting nickel, cobalt, copper and platinum group metals from complex nickel-copper concentrate
AU2014225297B2 (en) Metal extraction from fines
Baum et al. HPGR comminution for optimization of copper leaching
CN105593386A (en) Treatment of minerals
CN103952547A (en) Treatment method of zinc pressure leaching first-stage slag
CN111057858A (en) Comprehensive recovery method for extracting copper, iron, zinc and lead from copper slag
CN102302977A (en) Beneficiation method for improving grade of manganese in rhodochrosite ores
JP2019065340A (en) Wet smelting method of nickel oxide ore
Arslan et al. Development of a flowsheet for recovering copper and tin from copper refining slags

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14867723

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 14867723

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2