[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2012098838A1 - Report document creation assistance system, report document creation assistance method, and report document creation assistance program - Google Patents

Report document creation assistance system, report document creation assistance method, and report document creation assistance program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012098838A1
WO2012098838A1 PCT/JP2012/000141 JP2012000141W WO2012098838A1 WO 2012098838 A1 WO2012098838 A1 WO 2012098838A1 JP 2012000141 W JP2012000141 W JP 2012000141W WO 2012098838 A1 WO2012098838 A1 WO 2012098838A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
dialogue
report
utterance
degree
reporting
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/JP2012/000141
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
石川 開
晃裕 田村
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NEC Corp
Original Assignee
NEC Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NEC Corp filed Critical NEC Corp
Priority to JP2012553601A priority Critical patent/JPWO2012098838A1/en
Publication of WO2012098838A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012098838A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/34Browsing; Visualisation therefor
    • G06F16/345Summarisation for human users

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a report document creation support system, a report document creation support method, and a report document creation support program that generate a summary of dialog contents from an input dialog.
  • the call center responds to a huge number of inquiries from customers every day.
  • the contents of the response are recorded and managed, and are used for customer response follow-up, response, product and service problem analysis and improvement.
  • Response contents are often recorded and accumulated by voice data recording a call, report memo created by an operator, and the like.
  • the advantage of recording the response content by recording the call is that the dialogue between the operator and the customer is recorded without omission.
  • recording is performed by recording a voice
  • recording is performed using report memos.
  • the recording of the report memo has the advantage that it is easy to check the contents and reuse easily because the main points of the contents of the response are summarized in a short text.
  • a report memo preparation cost and an education cost are generated by the operator.
  • there are problems such as leakage of contents to be reported and variations in quality depending on the reporter.
  • Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2 describe an example of a summarization system that generates a short text that summarizes the main points of content from a call content text generated as a result of speech recognition for the call speech.
  • the sentence importance degree calculation means is based on the word weight calculated from the document set stored in the document data storage means. Calculate the importance of each sentence of the input text. Then, the sentence extraction unit generates summary text by extracting and arranging sentences with high importance, and outputs the summary text.
  • Non-Patent Document 2 is a standard response record model for each type of industry, which is stored in the storage means in advance by the summarization engine when the input means inputs the call content text.
  • a response record sentence is automatically generated based on the “summary template”.
  • the summarization engine automatically generates a summary sentence while ensuring unity of terms and style, completeness (there is no omission of necessary items), and conciseness (no unnecessary items are described) according to the template.
  • Non-Patent Document 1 general contents in document data are judged to be less important and tend not to be included in summaries. For this reason, there is a problem that if the text that summarizes the main points of the response contents is automatically generated from the call voice, the main points are likely to be leaked particularly in the frequently used response contents.
  • Non-Patent Document 2 needs to describe a “summary template” for ensuring the uniformity, completeness, and conciseness of terms and styles in advance. It is impossible to create a template that can ensure uniformity, completeness, and conciseness for all of the contents of customer service and various expressions of customers. In addition, for example, it is determined whether each sentence in the dialogue is a standard expression such as “Thank you for calling” or a greeting expression such as “Good morning”, and an unnecessary expression is obtained by analyzing such meaning. It is often the case that it is too verbose as a summary to simply remove typical expressions.
  • Non-Patent Document 2 when a variety of expressions are given to the customer, which is difficult to imagine, or when various expressions are given to the customer, the leakage of the main points is particularly noticed in the case of such a non-standard or new response. There is a problem that it is easy to occur, or there is a problem that a summary including many expressions that are not the main points is created as a result of trying to pick them up widely.
  • the present invention provides a report document creation support system, a report document creation support method, and a report document that can generate a high-quality summary covering the contents to be reported, which is suitable for a request for response management at a call center site or the like.
  • the purpose is to provide a creation support program.
  • a report document creation support system is stored in advance in a dialog report pair storage unit that stores a set of pairs of a dialog and a report document that is a sentence that reports the contents thereof, and the dialog report pair storage unit.
  • a dialog report pair storage unit that stores a set of pairs of a dialog and a report document that is a sentence that reports the contents thereof
  • the dialog report pair storage unit For each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the input dialogue based on the degree to which the content of each utterance or expression unit in the dialogue is included in the corresponding report document in the set of dialogue and report document pairs, Report level calculating means for calculating a report level indicating the degree of whether or not the utterance or the expression unit includes the contents to be reported in the report document is provided.
  • the report document creation support method stores in advance a set of pairs of a dialogue and a report document that is a sentence reporting the contents thereof in a storage means, and the dialogue stored in the storage means For each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the input dialogue based on the degree to which the content of each utterance or expression unit in the dialogue is included in the corresponding report document in the set of report document pairs Alternatively, the degree of reporting indicating the degree of whether or not the expression unit includes the content to be reported in the report document is calculated, and the calculated degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue is calculated together with the utterance or expression unit.
  • a summary is generated by extracting an utterance or an expression unit from the input dialog based on the output or the reported degree of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialog.
  • the report document creation support program includes a computer that stores the contents of each utterance or expression unit in a dialogue in a set of pairs of dialogue documents stored in the storage means and a report document that reports the contents. Based on the degree of inclusion in the corresponding report document, for each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the input dialogue, whether the utterance or the expression unit contains the content to be reported in the report document.
  • the process of calculating the degree of reporting and the degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit during the input dialogue is output together with the utterance or representation unit, or each utterance or expression during the calculated input dialogue It is characterized in that a process of generating a summary by extracting an utterance or an expression unit from an input dialogue based on the reporting degree of the unit is executed.
  • the degree of reporting which is the degree to which each input part in the dialogue (for example, by utterance or by a predetermined unit of expression) is a part related to the content that has been reported in the past reception, is displayed in the dialogue report.
  • the calculation is based on the appearance tendency of the dialog text expression and the report text expression in the set of dialog and report document pairs stored in the pair storage means.
  • the present invention is characterized in that a summary text is generated by extracting a sentence including an expression part having a high reporting degree based on the degree of reporting of each expression part in the input dialogue thus calculated.
  • FIG. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of the first embodiment of the present invention.
  • the system shown in FIG. 1 may be implemented, for example, as a reporting degree calculation system for supporting summary generation or report document creation.
  • the system shown in FIG. 1 includes a computer (central processing unit; processor; data processing unit) 100 that operates under program control, a storage medium 200, an input unit 300, and an output unit 400.
  • the computer 100 also includes a reporting degree calculation unit 101a.
  • the storage unit 200 includes a dialogue report pair storage unit 201a.
  • the dialogue report pair storage unit 201a stores a set of pairs of dialogue and a report document that is a sentence that reports the content.
  • the input means 300 inputs target conversation data.
  • the dialogue data may be in the form of audio data or text data.
  • voice recognition means (not shown) for performing voice recognition on the input voice data and outputting text data as a voice recognition result. It is also possible to treat each utterance or each expression unit extracted from as character string data.
  • the report degree calculation means 101a is input based on the appearance tendency of the dialog text expression and the report text expression in the set of the past response dialog text and report text stored in the dialog report pair storage means 201c. Calculate the degree of reporting of each expression part in the dialogue text.
  • the degree of reporting is the degree of how much the targeted expression part is related to the content that has been reported in the past reception. In other words, it is an index representing the degree of whether or not the expression part includes the content to be reported in the report document.
  • the output unit 400 outputs the reporting level of each utterance or each expression unit during the input dialogue calculated by the reporting level calculation unit 101a.
  • the output unit 400 may output, for example, the degree of reporting of each utterance or each expression unit together with the speech data or text data (character string data) of each utterance or each expression unit included in the input dialogue.
  • the output data format of each utterance or each expression unit during the input dialogue may be voice data or text data.
  • the output unit 400 may output each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialogue as character string data.
  • the output unit 400 may output each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialog as voice data as it is, or input voice data It is also possible to output as character string data based on text data generated by voice recognition.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of the operation of the reporting degree calculation system of the present embodiment.
  • the input unit 300 inputs a dialogue for which a reporting degree is calculated for each utterance or each expression unit (step A1).
  • the dialogue is input in a text format.
  • the summary generated by the system is also generated in text format and output.
  • the voice recognition means may convert the input dialogue voice into text data and output it as dialogue text to the reporting degree calculation means 101a.
  • the report degree calculation unit 101a reports a report document corresponding to the content of each utterance or each expression unit in the dialogue in the set of past response dialogue and report document pairs stored in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201a. Based on the degree (for example, appearance frequency) included in the input dialogue, the reporting degree of each utterance or each expression unit during the input dialogue is calculated (step A2). It is assumed that the reporting degree calculation means 101a has predetermined criteria for expression parts to be calculated for the reporting degree and how to extract them from the input dialogue. The reporting degree calculation unit 101a extracts each utterance or each expression unit included in the input dialogue according to such setting, and calculates a reporting degree for each extracted utterance or each expression unit.
  • the output means 400 outputs each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue together with the report level (step A3).
  • the reporting degree calculation system is the degree of whether or not each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the inputted dialogue includes the contents to be reported in the report document.
  • the degree of reporting is calculated, and each utterance or expression unit is output together with the degree of reporting. Therefore, the user can grasp the content portion to be reported in the input call.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of the second embodiment of the present invention.
  • the system shown in FIG. 3 is implemented as an interactive summary system, for example.
  • the system shown in FIG. 3 includes a computer 100 that operates under program control, a storage medium 200, input means 300, and output means 400.
  • the computer 100 also includes a reporting degree calculation unit 101b and a summary generation unit 102b.
  • the storage unit 200 includes a dialogue report pair storage unit 201b.
  • the configuration of the present embodiment is different from the configuration of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1 in that the computer 100 includes summary generation means 102b.
  • the reporting degree calculation unit 101b and the dialogue report pair storage unit 201b of the present embodiment are the same as the reporting degree calculation unit 101a and the dialogue report pair storage unit 201a in the first embodiment.
  • description of the same components as those in the first embodiment will be omitted.
  • the summary generation unit 102b selects an expression portion having a high reporting level from the input dialogue data based on the reporting level of each utterance or each expression unit included in the input dialogue calculated by the reporting level calculation unit 101b. Extract the sentence containing it and generate summary text.
  • the output unit 400 outputs the summary text generated by the summary generation unit 102b.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of the operation of the dialog summary system of the present embodiment. Note that the operations in steps B1 and B2 shown in FIG. 4 are the same as those in steps A1 and A2 in the first embodiment shown in FIG.
  • the input means 300 inputs a dialogue (step B1).
  • the reporting degree calculating unit 101b performs each utterance or each expression in the dialogue in a set of past response dialogue and report document pairs stored in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201b. Based on the degree to which the content of the unit is included in the corresponding report document, the degree of reporting of each utterance or each expression unit during the input dialogue is calculated (step B2).
  • the summary generation unit 102b performs the input during the dialogue based on the reporting degree of each utterance or each expression unit included in the inputted dialogue.
  • utterances or expression units utterances or expression units having a high reporting level are extracted and connected to generate a summary (step B3).
  • the summary generation method not only connects the sentences containing the extracted expression units, but also, for example, a simple arrangement like a bulleted list, or the original sentence that supplements the subject or adds or corrects the sentence end expression. It is also possible to use a method such as connecting after performing auxiliary editing work that does not change the context of.
  • the output unit 400 outputs the summary generated by the summary generation unit 102b (step B4).
  • the reporting degree calculation system extracts utterances or expression parts having a high reporting degree during conversation and connects them to generate a summary. Therefore, the reporting degree calculation system can generate a high-quality summary that suppresses the points to be reported, which is suitable for the requirements of the site of reception management.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of the third embodiment of the present invention.
  • the system shown in FIG. 5 is implemented as a report creation support system, for example.
  • the system shown in FIG. 5 includes a computer 100 that operates under program control, a storage medium 200, input means 300, and output means 400.
  • the computer 100 also includes a report degree calculation unit 101c, a summary generation unit 102c, and a dialogue report pair registration unit 103c.
  • the storage unit 200 includes a dialogue report pair storage unit 201c.
  • the configuration of this embodiment is different from the configuration of the second embodiment shown in FIG. 3 in that the computer 100 includes a dialog report pair registration unit 103c.
  • the reporting degree calculation unit 101c, summary generation unit 102c, and dialogue report pair storage unit 201c of the present embodiment are the same as the reporting degree calculation unit 101b, summary generation unit 102b, and dialogue report pair storage unit 201b in the second embodiment. It is.
  • description of the same components as those in the second embodiment will be omitted.
  • the dialog report pair registration unit 103c When the report document is input from the input unit 300, the dialog report pair registration unit 103c additionally stores the dialog report pair storage unit 201c in pairs with the dialog corresponding to the input report document.
  • the dialog report pair registration unit 103c registers them in the dialog report pair storage unit 201c as a pair. Also good. For example, when the identification number of the dialogue and the identification number of the report document are different, the dialogue report pair registration unit 103c inputs the report document including information indicating which dialogue corresponds to the report document. A correspondence relationship may be identified by providing an interface. Further, for example, when the dialog report pair registration unit 103c outputs the summary generated by the summary generation unit 102b, the dialog report pair registration unit 103c edits the dialog with the dialog identification number assigned by the system (the user edits the summary). Screen to create a report document), and when the user inputs an instruction to create and save the report document via the edit screen, the report document is input together with the identification number of the dialog. A simple user interface may be provided.
  • FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an example of the operation of the report creation support system of this embodiment.
  • the operations in steps C1 to C3 shown in FIG. 6 are basically the same as those in steps B1 to B3 in the second embodiment shown in FIG.
  • the input means 300 inputs a dialog text (step C1).
  • the reporting degree calculation unit 101c stores a reporting degree, which is a degree of how much each expression part in the inputted dialogue text is related to the contents reported in the past reception, in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c. Calculation is performed based on the appearance tendency of the expression of the dialog text and the expression of the report text in the set of the stored pairs of the dialog text and the report text of the past response (step C2).
  • the summary generation means 102c extracts sentences including an expression part with a high degree of report in the dialogue text, and generates a summary text by arranging them (step C3).
  • the output unit 400 outputs the generated summary text (step C4).
  • the dialogue report pair registration unit 103c sequentially inputs report documents created by the user, and additionally stores them in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c in pairs with the corresponding dialogue ( Step C5).
  • the interactive report pair registration unit 103c may provide a user interface for inputting a report document created by the user referring to or editing the summary text based on the output summary text, for example.
  • the dialog report pair registration unit 103c determines the dialog and the report document based on the dialog identification number attached to the report document.
  • a pair may be additionally stored in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c.
  • the dialogue report pair registration unit 103c pairs the dialogue text input in step C1 with the report document input in step C5. And stored in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c.
  • step C1 to step C5 are sequentially repeated according to the input of the dialogue and the report document.
  • the report creation support system presents the user with a summary of the points to be reported that are suitable for the site management requirements. Therefore, the report creation support system can improve the quality such as the reduction of report omission in the creation of the report document of the user and shorten the creation time. Further, the report creation support system is configured to input a report document created by the user with reference to the summary and reflect it in the calculation of the report degree from the next time. Therefore, the report creation support system can generate a high-quality summary in accordance with the latest judgment in selecting the report contents of the user.
  • the input means 300 inputs a dialog text for which a summary is to be created (step A1 in FIG. 4).
  • FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the dialog text input to the input unit 300.
  • the case where the dialogue is input as text data will be described as an example, but the dialogue may be input as voice data.
  • the report creation support system performs the subsequent processing on the dialog voice and the dialog text that is the voice recognition result.
  • the reporting degree calculation means 101a stores in the dialogue report pair storage means 201a the degree of reporting, which is the degree to which each expression part in the inputted dialogue text is related to the content reported in the past response.
  • a calculation is made based on the appearance tendency of the dialogue text expression and the report text expression in the set of the past dialogue text and report text pairs stored (step A2).
  • the degree of reporting for each expression in the dialog text can be specifically calculated as follows. First, let w be the expression in the dialog text and w 'be the expression in the report text. Also, a virtual report text is introduced and this is set as Rv .
  • the reporting degree calculation means 101a calculates the reporting degree for the expression w in the input dialog text as a probability P (w
  • R) is estimated by the following equation (2)
  • w ') is estimated by the following equation (3).
  • P (w, w ′) represents the co-occurrence probability that the expression w appears during the dialogue and the expression w ′ appears in the corresponding report text.
  • the reporting degree calculating means 101a obtains the dialogue text expression and the reporting degree. Note that even if the expression w in the dialog text is described using a different expression w ′ in the report text, it is taken into account for the calculation of the reporting degree of the expression w in the dialog text. is required.
  • w ′) can be estimated as in the following equation (4).
  • C (w, w ′) represents the frequency in which the expression w appears in the dialog text and the expression w ′ appears in the corresponding report text in the pair set of the dialog text and the report text. Yes.
  • C (w ′) represents the frequency of occurrence of the expression w ′ in the report text.
  • r (w ′) represents the number of different expressions w ′ that have appeared so far in the report text relative to the expression w in the dialog text.
  • FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a report document for the dialog text shown in FIG.
  • “Increase” in the utterance “I want to increase the number of email accounts” during the dialogue shown in FIG. 7 is another expression “Increase” in the sentence “I want to increase the number of email accounts” in the report document shown in FIG. It can be appropriately evaluated that it is reported using.
  • step A2 for example, when the expression unit in the dialog text is a morpheme, the degree of reporting is obtained for each morpheme (utilized form is converted to the original form) as shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the degree of reporting calculated for each expression unit (morpheme) in the dialog text.
  • FIG. 8 shows that, for example, the reporting degree of the morpheme “mail account” is calculated as 0.81, and the reporting degree of the morpheme “increase” is calculated as 0.81.
  • the output unit 400 outputs each expression unit in the dialogue together with the report degree (step A3).
  • the output unit 400 may output each expression unit in the input dialogue together with the report degree in the form of a list as shown in FIG. At that time, the output unit 400 may output only the expression unit whose reporting degree is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold together with the reporting degree. In addition, for example, when the reporting degree is calculated in units of utterances, the output unit 400 may output each utterance during the input dialogue or an utterance of a predetermined threshold or more together with the reporting degree. Note that the method for calculating the degree of reporting of each utterance during the input dialogue is described in the second embodiment.
  • the report creation support system extracts each expression unit included in the input dialogue, and the reporting degree is such that each expression unit includes the content to be reported in the report document. , And each expression unit is output together with the report level. For this reason, the user can easily grasp the content portion to be reported in the input call.
  • step B1 to B2 corresponds to the second embodiment described above.
  • the operation from step B1 to B2 is the same as the operation from step A1 to A2 in the first embodiment described in the first example.
  • the summary generation unit 102b further extracts utterances or expression units including an expression part having a high reporting degree from the expression parts in the dialog text, and generates the summary text side by side.
  • the degree of reporting for the utterance is calculated, and the sum of the degree of reporting for each utterance extracted in the summary text is within a range that does not exceed the predetermined summary rate or summary length. What is necessary is just to select the combination of the utterances extracted so that a value may become the maximum.
  • the degree of reporting for an utterance is obtained, for example, as a value obtained by normalizing the sum of the degree of reporting for each morpheme during the utterance as shown in the following formula (5).
  • FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the reporting degree calculated for each expression unit (utterance) in the dialog text.
  • the degree of reporting of the utterance “Thank you for a long time” is calculated as 0.52
  • the degree of reporting of the utterance “I want to increase the number of email accounts” is calculated as 0.46. It has been shown.
  • the summary generation means 102b allows the utterances to be extracted so that the sum of the reporting levels of the utterances extracted in the summary text is maximized within a range not exceeding the predetermined summary rate or summary length. Select a combination. Then, the summary generation means 102b generates a summary text by arranging the selected combinations of utterances (step B3).
  • the summary generation means 102b may generate 119 character summary text not exceeding that as shown in FIG.
  • FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the generated summary text.
  • the summary generation unit 102b may also output information indicating who each utterance is from (in this example, from a client or an operator). .
  • the output unit 400 outputs the generated summary text (step B4).
  • the report creation support system extracts, from the summary, utterances or expression points with a high reporting degree during the actual dialogue based on the degree of reporting calculated for each expression unit included in the input dialogue. For this reason, the report creation support system can generate a high-quality summary with the points to be reported, which is suitable for the requirements of the site of reception management. In addition, the report creation support system outputs the generated summary so that the user can easily create a report document by referring to the summary. It is possible to improve quality such as reduction and shorten creation time.
  • step C1 to C3 corresponds to the third embodiment described above.
  • the operations from step C1 to C3 are the same as the operations from step A1 to A2 and step B3 described in the first and second embodiments.
  • the user when the user creates a report document based on the summary text output in step B3 in the second embodiment, the user inputs this report document from the input means 300, and the dialogue report pair.
  • the registration unit 103c additionally stores this report document in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c as a pair together with the corresponding dialogue (step C5).
  • the dialogue report pair registration unit 103c additionally stores the report document together with the corresponding dialogue (dialog shown in FIG. 7) in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c.
  • the corresponding dialogue has been input at a stage (in this example, step C1) before the report document is input.
  • the report creation support system stores the input dialogue together with the identification number in a storage unit that temporarily holds the dialogue.
  • the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c may also serve as a storage unit for temporarily holding the storage unit.
  • the report creation support system presents the user with a summary of the points to be reported that are suitable for the site management requirements, and immediately reports the report document created by the user who referred to it. It can be used to calculate the degree of subsequent reporting.
  • the report creation support system also reflects the latest conversion methods such as the latest judgment of the selection of report contents in the report creation by the user and how the expression during dialogue is paraphrased in the report document. And a higher quality summary can be generated.
  • FIG. 12 is a block diagram showing an outline of the present invention.
  • the report document creation support system includes a report degree calculation unit 11 and a dialogue report pair storage unit 12.
  • the dialogue report pair storage unit 12 (for example, dialogue report pair storage unit 201a, 201b, 201c) stores a set of pairs of a dialogue and a report document that is a sentence reporting the contents in advance.
  • the reporting degree calculating means 11 (for example, the reporting degree calculating means 101a, 101b, 101c) is the contents of each utterance or expression unit in dialogue in the set of dialogue and report document pairs stored in the dialogue report pair storage means 12. For each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the input dialogue based on the degree to which is included in the corresponding report document, whether the utterance or the expression unit contains the content to be reported in the report document Calculate the degree of reporting that represents the degree of.
  • the report degree calculation means 11 uses the input report degree of each utterance or expression unit in the dialogue as a probability of the occurrence of the expression w in the dialogue as a different representation w ′ in the report document. You may calculate based on the appearance probability to the report document of the same expression in the past dialog calculated using w ').
  • the report document creation support system outputs the report level of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue calculated by the report level calculation means 11 together with the utterance or expression unit. Means may be provided.
  • each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue calculated by the reporting degree calculation unit 11, there may be provided summary generation means for extracting the utterance or expression unit from the input dialogue and generating a summary. Good.
  • summary output means for outputting the summary generated by the summary generation means, report documents created based on the output summary are sequentially input, and the input report document and the dialog corresponding to the report document are provided.
  • a dialog report pair registering unit that additionally stores the pair in the dialog report pair storing unit may be provided.
  • a dialog input means for inputting a dialog as text data may be provided, and each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialog may be character string data.
  • a dialogue input means for inputting a dialogue as voice data and a voice recognition means for generating text data from the inputted voice data, each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialogue is voice data or character string data. There may be.
  • the summary generation means may generate a summary of the text data by using the speech data or character string data utterance or expression unit extracted from the dialogue input based on the report level.
  • the present invention can be suitably applied to uses such as report creation support from call voice in a contact center, cleansing of call text for text mining and search, and FAQ creation support.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Machine Translation (AREA)

Abstract

A report document creation assistance system comprises: a conversation report pairing storage means for pre-storing a set of pairs of conversations and report documents which are texts which report the content of the conversations; and a relevance calculation means for calculating relevance for each utterance or each expression unit which are extracted from an inputted conversation, which represents the extent to which the utterance or the expression unit includes content which should be reported in the report document, based on the degree to which the content of each conversational utterance or expression unit in the set of the pairings of the conversations and report documents which are stored in the conversation report pairing storage means is included in the corresponding report documents.

Description

報告文書作成支援システム、報告文書作成支援方法および報告文書作成支援プログラムReport document creation support system, report document creation support method, and report document creation support program

 本発明は、入力される対話から対話内容の要約を生成する報告文書作成支援システム、報告文書作成支援方法および報告文書作成支援プログラムに関する。 The present invention relates to a report document creation support system, a report document creation support method, and a report document creation support program that generate a summary of dialog contents from an input dialog.

 コールセンターでは、日々顧客からの膨大な数の問い合わせに対して応対している。その応対内容は、記録管理されて、顧客対応のフォローや応対、商品、サービスの問題分析や改善などに活用されている。応答内容は、通話を録音した音声データや、オペレータが作成する報告メモなどにより記録・蓄積されることが多い。 The call center responds to a huge number of inquiries from customers every day. The contents of the response are recorded and managed, and are used for customer response follow-up, response, product and service problem analysis and improvement. Response contents are often recorded and accumulated by voice data recording a call, report memo created by an operator, and the like.

 応答内容を通話の録音により記録する場合の利点は、オペレータと顧客の対話がそのまま漏れなく記録される点にある。しかし、音声の録音により記録した場合、その内容を確認するための方法である音声の再生に時間がかかるという問題がある。このため、コールセンターの多くでは、報告メモによる記録が行われている。報告メモによる記録は、応対内容の要点が短いテキストでまとめられるため、内容の確認が容易で再利用しやすいのが利点である。しかし、オペレータによる報告メモの作成コストや教育コストが発生するという問題がある。また、報告すべき内容の漏れや報告者による品質のばらつきが生じるといった課題も存在する。 The advantage of recording the response content by recording the call is that the dialogue between the operator and the customer is recorded without omission. However, when recording is performed by recording a voice, there is a problem that it takes time to reproduce the voice, which is a method for confirming the contents. For this reason, in many call centers, recording is performed using report memos. The recording of the report memo has the advantage that it is easy to check the contents and reuse easily because the main points of the contents of the response are summarized in a short text. However, there is a problem that a report memo preparation cost and an education cost are generated by the operator. In addition, there are problems such as leakage of contents to be reported and variations in quality depending on the reporter.

 そこで、通話音声から、応対内容の要点をまとめたテキストを自動で生成するまたは生成を支援するといった要求がある。 Therefore, there is a demand for automatically generating or supporting the generation of text that summarizes the main points of the contents of the response from the call voice.

 例えば、非特許文献1、2には、通話音声に対する音声認識の結果生成される通話内容テキストから内容の要点をまとめた短いテキストを生成する要約システムの一例が記載されている。 For example, Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2 describe an example of a summarization system that generates a short text that summarizes the main points of content from a call content text generated as a result of speech recognition for the call speech.

 非特許文献1に記載されている要約システムは、入力手段が通話内容テキストを入力すると、文重要度計算手段が、文書データ記憶手段に記憶された文書集合から計算される単語の重みに基づいて入力テキストの各文の重要度を計算する。そして、文抽出手段が、重要度の高い文を抽出し並べることにより要約テキストを生成し、出力手段から出力する。 In the summarization system described in Non-Patent Document 1, when the input means inputs the call content text, the sentence importance degree calculation means is based on the word weight calculated from the document set stored in the document data storage means. Calculate the importance of each sentence of the input text. Then, the sentence extraction unit generates summary text by extracting and arranging sentences with high importance, and outputs the summary text.

 また、非特許文献2に記載されている要約システムは、入力手段が通話内容テキストを入力すると、要約エンジンが、予め記憶手段に記憶された、業種ごとの標準的な応答記録の雛形である「要約テンプレート」に基づいて応答記録文を自動生成する。要約エンジンは、テンプレートに従って用語や文体の統一性、網羅性(必要事項の記載漏れがないこと)、簡潔性(不要事項の記載がないこと)を確保しつつ要約文を自動生成する。 Further, the summarization system described in Non-Patent Document 2 is a standard response record model for each type of industry, which is stored in the storage means in advance by the summarization engine when the input means inputs the call content text. A response record sentence is automatically generated based on the “summary template”. The summarization engine automatically generates a summary sentence while ensuring unity of terms and style, completeness (there is no omission of necessary items), and conciseness (no unnecessary items are described) according to the template.

岩野、広畑、新中、古井、「重要文抽出による音声自動要約手法とその客観評価法についての検討」、電子情報通信学会技術研究報告、105巻、132(SP2005 20-26)号、2005年、p.1-6Iwano, Hirohata, Shinnaka, Furui, “Study on automatic speech summarization technique and its objective evaluation method by extracting important sentences”, IEICE Technical Report, Volume 105, 132 (SP2005 20-26), 2005 , P. 1-6 堀、竹原、「対話要約で実現する”顧客の声”活用-電話応対の自動要約と全件モニタリングの実現-」、NRI ITソリューションフロンティア 2010年9月号、p.10-13Hori, Takehara, “Utilization of“ Voice of Voice ”Realized by Dialogue Summarization-Realization of Automatic Summarization of Telephone Response and Monitoring of All Items” ”, NRI IT Solution Frontier, September 2010, p. 10-13

 しかし、非特許文献1に記載されている要約システムでは、文書データ中における一般的な内容について、その重要度が低いと判断され、要約に含まれない傾向がある。このため、通話音声から応対内容の要点をまとめたテキストを自動生成する目的で利用すると、よく用いられる応対内容等で特に、要点の漏れが生じやすいという問題がある。 However, in the summarization system described in Non-Patent Document 1, general contents in document data are judged to be less important and tend not to be included in summaries. For this reason, there is a problem that if the text that summarizes the main points of the response contents is automatically generated from the call voice, the main points are likely to be leaked particularly in the frequently used response contents.

 また、非特許文献2に記載されている要約システムは、あらかじめ用語や文体の統一性、網羅性および簡潔性を確保するための「要約テンプレート」を記述しておく必要があるが、想定し難い応対内容や顧客の多様な表現全てに対して統一性、網羅性および簡潔性を確保できるテンプレートを作成することは不可能である。また、例えば、対話中の各文について「お電話ありがとうございます」等の定型表現や「おはようございます」等の挨拶表現であるか否かを判定し、このような意味の解析によって不要な表現や定型的な表現を除去するだけでは、要約として冗長すぎる場合も少なくない。従って、非特許文献2に記載されている要約システムでは、想定し難い応対内容や顧客に多様な表現がされた場合などに、そのような定型外や新規の応対内容等で特に、要点の漏れが生じやすいといった問題や、またはそれらを幅広く拾おうとした結果、要点ではない表現が多く含まれる要約が作成されるといった問題がある。 In addition, the summarization system described in Non-Patent Document 2 needs to describe a “summary template” for ensuring the uniformity, completeness, and conciseness of terms and styles in advance. It is impossible to create a template that can ensure uniformity, completeness, and conciseness for all of the contents of customer service and various expressions of customers. In addition, for example, it is determined whether each sentence in the dialogue is a standard expression such as “Thank you for calling” or a greeting expression such as “Good morning”, and an unnecessary expression is obtained by analyzing such meaning. It is often the case that it is too verbose as a summary to simply remove typical expressions. Therefore, in the summarization system described in Non-Patent Document 2, when a variety of expressions are given to the customer, which is difficult to imagine, or when various expressions are given to the customer, the leakage of the main points is particularly noticed in the case of such a non-standard or new response. There is a problem that it is easy to occur, or there is a problem that a summary including many expressions that are not the main points is created as a result of trying to pick them up widely.

 そこで、本発明は、コールセンターの現場等における応対管理の要求に適した、報告すべき内容を網羅した品質の良い要約を生成することのできる報告文書作成支援システム、報告文書作成支援方法および報告文書作成支援プログラムを提供することを目的とする。 Accordingly, the present invention provides a report document creation support system, a report document creation support method, and a report document that can generate a high-quality summary covering the contents to be reported, which is suitable for a request for response management at a call center site or the like. The purpose is to provide a creation support program.

 本発明による報告文書作成支援システムは、予め、対話とその内容を報告した文章である報告文書との対の集合を記憶する対話報告対記憶手段と、前記対話報告対記憶手段に記憶されている対話と報告文書の対の集合において対話中の各発話または表現単位の内容が対応する報告文書中に含まれている度合いに基づき、入力された対話から抽出される各発話または各表現単位について、当該発話または当該表現単位が報告文書において報告されるべき内容を含むかどうかの程度を表す報告度を計算する報告度計算手段とを備えたことを特徴とする。 A report document creation support system according to the present invention is stored in advance in a dialog report pair storage unit that stores a set of pairs of a dialog and a report document that is a sentence that reports the contents thereof, and the dialog report pair storage unit. For each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the input dialogue based on the degree to which the content of each utterance or expression unit in the dialogue is included in the corresponding report document in the set of dialogue and report document pairs, Report level calculating means for calculating a report level indicating the degree of whether or not the utterance or the expression unit includes the contents to be reported in the report document is provided.

 また、本発明による報告文書作成支援方法は、予め、対話とその内容を報告した文章である報告文書との対の集合を記憶手段に記憶しておき、前記記憶手段に記憶されている対話と報告文書の対の集合において対話中の各発話または表現単位の内容が対応する報告文書中に含まれている度合いに基づき、入力された対話から抽出される各発話または各表現単位について、当該発話または当該表現単位が報告文書において報告されるべき内容を含むかどうかの程度を表す報告度を計算し、計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を、該発話または表現単位とともに出力する、または、計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を基に入力対話から発話または表現単位を抽出して要約を生成することを特徴とする。 Further, the report document creation support method according to the present invention stores in advance a set of pairs of a dialogue and a report document that is a sentence reporting the contents thereof in a storage means, and the dialogue stored in the storage means For each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the input dialogue based on the degree to which the content of each utterance or expression unit in the dialogue is included in the corresponding report document in the set of report document pairs Alternatively, the degree of reporting indicating the degree of whether or not the expression unit includes the content to be reported in the report document is calculated, and the calculated degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue is calculated together with the utterance or expression unit. A summary is generated by extracting an utterance or an expression unit from the input dialog based on the output or the reported degree of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialog.

 また、本発明による報告文書作成支援プログラムは、コンピュータに、記憶手段に記憶されている対話とその内容を報告した文章である報告文書の対の集合において対話中の各発話または表現単位の内容が対応する報告文書中に含まれている度合いに基づき、入力された対話から抽出される各発話または各表現単位について、当該発話または当該表現単位が報告文書において報告されるべき内容を含むかどうかの程度を表す報告度を計算する処理、および計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を、該発話または表現単位とともに出力する、または、計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を基に入力対話から発話または表現単位を抽出して要約を生成する処理を実行させることを特徴とする。 In addition, the report document creation support program according to the present invention includes a computer that stores the contents of each utterance or expression unit in a dialogue in a set of pairs of dialogue documents stored in the storage means and a report document that reports the contents. Based on the degree of inclusion in the corresponding report document, for each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the input dialogue, whether the utterance or the expression unit contains the content to be reported in the report document The process of calculating the degree of reporting and the degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit during the input dialogue is output together with the utterance or representation unit, or each utterance or expression during the calculated input dialogue It is characterized in that a process of generating a summary by extracting an utterance or an expression unit from an input dialogue based on the reporting degree of the unit is executed.

 本発明によれば、応対管理の要求に適した、報告すべき内容を網羅した品質の良い要約を生成することを可能とする。 According to the present invention, it is possible to generate a high-quality summary covering the contents to be reported, which is suitable for the request for response management.

第1の実施形態の構成例を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the structural example of 1st Embodiment. 第1の実施形態の動作の一例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows an example of operation | movement of 1st Embodiment. 第2の実施形態の構成例を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the structural example of 2nd Embodiment. 第2の実施形態の動作の一例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows an example of operation | movement of 2nd Embodiment. 第3の実施形態の構成例を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the structural example of 3rd Embodiment. 第3の実施形態の動作の一例を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows an example of operation | movement of 3rd Embodiment. 対話テキストの一例を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of a dialog text. 対話テキスト中の各表現単位(形態素)に対して計算される報告度の一例を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of the report degree calculated with respect to each expression unit (morpheme) in a dialog text. 対話テキスト中の各表現単位(発話)に対して計算される報告度の一例を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of the report degree calculated with respect to each expression unit (utterance) in a dialog text. 生成される要約テキストの一例を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of the summary text produced | generated. 図7に示す対話テキストに対する報告文書の一例を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of the report document with respect to the dialogue text shown in FIG. 本発明の概要を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the outline | summary of this invention.

 まず、本発明の特徴について説明する。本発明は、入力された対話中の各表現部分(例えば、発話または所定の表現単位によるもの)が過去の応対においてどの程度報告されている内容に関する部分かの度合いである報告度を、対話報告対記憶手段に記憶された対話と報告文書の対の集合における、対話テキストの表現と報告テキストの表現の出現傾向に基づいて計算することを特徴とする。また、本発明は、このように計算される入力対話中の各表現部分の報告度に基づき、報告度の高い表現部分を含む文を抽出して要約テキストを生成することを特徴とする。 First, the features of the present invention will be described. In the present invention, the degree of reporting, which is the degree to which each input part in the dialogue (for example, by utterance or by a predetermined unit of expression) is a part related to the content that has been reported in the past reception, is displayed in the dialogue report. The calculation is based on the appearance tendency of the dialog text expression and the report text expression in the set of dialog and report document pairs stored in the pair storage means. Further, the present invention is characterized in that a summary text is generated by extracting a sentence including an expression part having a high reporting degree based on the degree of reporting of each expression part in the input dialogue thus calculated.

 このような構成を採用し、過去の応対で報告される傾向の高い内容を優先的に要約に抽出することを可能とする報告度を入力対話の各発話または各表現単位につき計算することによって、コールセンターの現場等における応対管理の要求に適した、報告すべき内容を網羅した品質の良い要約を生成することができる。 By adopting such a configuration and calculating the degree of reporting for each utterance or each expression unit of the input dialogue, which enables the high-priority content reported in the past response to be preferentially extracted into the summary, It is possible to generate a high-quality summary covering the contents to be reported, which is suitable for the request for response management at a call center site or the like.

 以下、本発明の実施形態について図面を参照して説明する。 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

実施形態1.
 図1は、本発明の第1の実施形態の構成例を示すブロック図である。図1に示すシステムは、例えば、要約生成または報告文書作成を支援するための報告度計算システムとして実施されてもよい。図1に示すシステムは、プログラム制御により動作するコンピュータ(中央処理装置;プロセッサ;データ処理装置)100と、記憶媒体200と、入力手段300と、出力手段400とを備える。また、コンピュータ100は、報告度計算手段101aを含む。また、記憶手段200は、対話報告対記憶手段201aを含む。
Embodiment 1. FIG.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of the first embodiment of the present invention. The system shown in FIG. 1 may be implemented, for example, as a reporting degree calculation system for supporting summary generation or report document creation. The system shown in FIG. 1 includes a computer (central processing unit; processor; data processing unit) 100 that operates under program control, a storage medium 200, an input unit 300, and an output unit 400. The computer 100 also includes a reporting degree calculation unit 101a. The storage unit 200 includes a dialogue report pair storage unit 201a.

 対話報告対記憶手段201aは、対話と、その内容を報告した文章である報告文書との対の集合を記憶する。 The dialogue report pair storage unit 201a stores a set of pairs of dialogue and a report document that is a sentence that reports the content.

 入力手段300は、対象とする対話データを入力する。対話データは、音声データの形式であってもテキストデータの形式であってもよい。対話データが音声データの形式で入力される場合には、入力された音声データに対して音声認識を行って音声認識結果としてテキストデータを出力する音声認識手段(図示省略)を備えることによって、対話から抽出する各発話または各表現単位を文字列データとして扱うことも可能である。 The input means 300 inputs target conversation data. The dialogue data may be in the form of audio data or text data. When the dialogue data is input in the form of voice data, the dialogue is provided by voice recognition means (not shown) for performing voice recognition on the input voice data and outputting text data as a voice recognition result. It is also possible to treat each utterance or each expression unit extracted from as character string data.

 報告度計算手段101aは、対話報告対記憶手段201cに記憶された過去の応対の対話テキストと報告テキストの対の集合における、対話テキストの表現と報告テキストの表現の出現傾向に基づいて、入力された対話テキスト中の各表現部分の報告度を計算する。ここで、報告度は、対象とされた表現部分が過去の応対においてどの程度報告されている内容に関する部分かの度合いである。換言すると、当該表現部分が報告文書において報告されるべき内容を含むかどうかの程度を表す指標である。 The report degree calculation means 101a is input based on the appearance tendency of the dialog text expression and the report text expression in the set of the past response dialog text and report text stored in the dialog report pair storage means 201c. Calculate the degree of reporting of each expression part in the dialogue text. Here, the degree of reporting is the degree of how much the targeted expression part is related to the content that has been reported in the past reception. In other words, it is an index representing the degree of whether or not the expression part includes the content to be reported in the report document.

 出力手段400は、報告度計算手段101aによって計算された入力対話中の各発話または各表現単位の報告度を出力する。出力手段400は、例えば、入力対話に含まれる各発話または各表現単位の音声データまたはテキストデータ(文字列データ)とともに、当該各発話または各表現単位の報告度を出力してもよい。なお、入力対話中の各発話または各表現単位の出力データ形式は、音声データであってもテキストデータであってもよい。 The output unit 400 outputs the reporting level of each utterance or each expression unit during the input dialogue calculated by the reporting level calculation unit 101a. The output unit 400 may output, for example, the degree of reporting of each utterance or each expression unit together with the speech data or text data (character string data) of each utterance or each expression unit included in the input dialogue. The output data format of each utterance or each expression unit during the input dialogue may be voice data or text data.

 一例として、対話データがテキストデータとして入力される場合には、出力手段400は、対話中から抽出される各発話または各表現単位を文字列データとして出力してもよい。また、例えば対話データが音声データとして入力される場合には、出力手段400は、対話中から抽出される各発話または各表現単位をそのまま音声データとして出力してもよいし、入力された音声データから音声認識により生成されたテキストデータを基に文字列データとして出力することも可能である。 As an example, when dialogue data is input as text data, the output unit 400 may output each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialogue as character string data. For example, when dialog data is input as voice data, the output unit 400 may output each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialog as voice data as it is, or input voice data It is also possible to output as character string data based on text data generated by voice recognition.

 次に、本実施形態の報告度計算システムの動作を説明する。図2は、本実施形態の報告度計算システムの動作の一例を示すフローチャートである。図2に示す例では、まず、入力手段300が、各発話または各表現単位について報告度を計算する対象の対話を入力する(ステップA1)。本例では、対話はテキスト形式で入力されるものとする。また、当該システムが生成する要約もテキスト形式で生成し、出力するものとする。なお、音声データとして入力される場合には、ステップC1の後に、音声認識手段が入力対話音声をテキストデータに変換し、対話テキストにして報告度計算手段101aに出力すればよい。 Next, the operation of the reporting degree calculation system of this embodiment will be described. FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an example of the operation of the reporting degree calculation system of the present embodiment. In the example shown in FIG. 2, first, the input unit 300 inputs a dialogue for which a reporting degree is calculated for each utterance or each expression unit (step A1). In this example, it is assumed that the dialogue is input in a text format. The summary generated by the system is also generated in text format and output. In the case of input as voice data, after step C1, the voice recognition means may convert the input dialogue voice into text data and output it as dialogue text to the reporting degree calculation means 101a.

 次に、報告度計算手段101aは、対話報告対記憶手段201aに記憶されている過去の応答の対話と報告文書の対の集合において対話中の各発話または各表現単位の内容が対応する報告文書中に含まれている度合い(例えば、出現頻度)に基づいて、入力対話中の各発話または各表現単位の報告度を計算する(ステップA2)。なお、報告度計算手段101aには、報告度の計算対象とする表現部分の基準およびそれらを入力対話からどのように抽出するのかの方法が予め設定により定められているものとする。報告度計算手段101aは、そのような設定に応じて、入力対話に含まれる各発話または各表現単位を抽出し、抽出した各発話または各表現単位について報告度を計算する。 Next, the report degree calculation unit 101a reports a report document corresponding to the content of each utterance or each expression unit in the dialogue in the set of past response dialogue and report document pairs stored in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201a. Based on the degree (for example, appearance frequency) included in the input dialogue, the reporting degree of each utterance or each expression unit during the input dialogue is calculated (step A2). It is assumed that the reporting degree calculation means 101a has predetermined criteria for expression parts to be calculated for the reporting degree and how to extract them from the input dialogue. The reporting degree calculation unit 101a extracts each utterance or each expression unit included in the input dialogue according to such setting, and calculates a reporting degree for each extracted utterance or each expression unit.

 最後に出力手段400は、入力対話中の各発話または表現単位を、報告度とともに出力する(ステップA3)。 Finally, the output means 400 outputs each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue together with the report level (step A3).

 以上のように、本実施形態では、報告度計算システムは、入力された対話から抽出される各発話または各表現単位に対して、報告文書中に報告すべき内容を含むかどうかの程度である報告度を計算し、それら各発話または表現単位を報告度とともに出力する。そのため、利用者は入力通話における報告すべき内容部分を把握することができる。 As described above, in the present embodiment, the reporting degree calculation system is the degree of whether or not each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the inputted dialogue includes the contents to be reported in the report document. The degree of reporting is calculated, and each utterance or expression unit is output together with the degree of reporting. Therefore, the user can grasp the content portion to be reported in the input call.

実施形態2.
 次に、本発明の第2の実施形態について図面を参照して説明する。図3は、本発明の第2の実施形態の構成例を示すブロック図である。図3に示すシステムは、例えば、対話要約システムとして実施される。図3に示すシステムは、プログラム制御により動作するコンピュータ100と、記憶媒体200と、入力手段300と、出力手段400とを備える。また、コンピュータ100は、報告度計算手段101bと、要約生成手段102bとを含む。また、記憶手段200は、対話報告対記憶手段201bを含む。
Embodiment 2. FIG.
Next, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of the second embodiment of the present invention. The system shown in FIG. 3 is implemented as an interactive summary system, for example. The system shown in FIG. 3 includes a computer 100 that operates under program control, a storage medium 200, input means 300, and output means 400. The computer 100 also includes a reporting degree calculation unit 101b and a summary generation unit 102b. The storage unit 200 includes a dialogue report pair storage unit 201b.

 本実施形態の構成は、図1に示す第1の実施形態の構成と比べて、コンピュータ100が要約生成手段102bを含む点が異なっている。なお、本実施形態の報告度計算手段101b、対話報告対記憶手段201bは、第1の実施形態における報告度計算手段101a、対話報告対記憶手段201aと同様である。以下、第1の実施形態と同様のものについては説明を省略する。 The configuration of the present embodiment is different from the configuration of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1 in that the computer 100 includes summary generation means 102b. Note that the reporting degree calculation unit 101b and the dialogue report pair storage unit 201b of the present embodiment are the same as the reporting degree calculation unit 101a and the dialogue report pair storage unit 201a in the first embodiment. Hereinafter, description of the same components as those in the first embodiment will be omitted.

 要約生成手段102bは、報告度計算手段101bが計算した入力された対話に含まれる各発話または各表現単位の報告度に基づいて、入力された対話データの中から、報告度の高い表現部分を含む文を抽出して要約テキストを生成する。 The summary generation unit 102b selects an expression portion having a high reporting level from the input dialogue data based on the reporting level of each utterance or each expression unit included in the input dialogue calculated by the reporting level calculation unit 101b. Extract the sentence containing it and generate summary text.

 また、本実施形態において出力手段400は、要約生成手段102bによって生成された要約テキストを出力する。 In the present embodiment, the output unit 400 outputs the summary text generated by the summary generation unit 102b.

 次に、本実施形態の報告度計算システムの動作を説明する。図4は、本実施形態の対話要約システムの動作の一例を示すフローチャートである。なお、図4に示すステップB1~B2の動作は、図2に示した第1の実施形態におけるステップA1~A2と同様である。 Next, the operation of the reporting degree calculation system of this embodiment will be described. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of the operation of the dialog summary system of the present embodiment. Note that the operations in steps B1 and B2 shown in FIG. 4 are the same as those in steps A1 and A2 in the first embodiment shown in FIG.

 すなわち、まず、入力手段300が、対話を入力する(ステップB1)。次に、報告度計算手段101bは、第1の実施形態と同様、対話報告対記憶手段201bに記憶されている過去の応答の対話と報告文書の対の集合において対話中の各発話または各表現単位の内容が対応する報告文書中に含まれている度合いに基づいて、入力対話中の各発話または各表現単位の報告度を計算する(ステップB2)。 That is, first, the input means 300 inputs a dialogue (step B1). Next, as in the first embodiment, the reporting degree calculating unit 101b performs each utterance or each expression in the dialogue in a set of past response dialogue and report document pairs stored in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201b. Based on the degree to which the content of the unit is included in the corresponding report document, the degree of reporting of each utterance or each expression unit during the input dialogue is calculated (step B2).

 入力対話中の各発話または各表現単位について報告度が計算されると、要約生成手段102bは、入力された対話に含まれる各発話または各表現単位の報告度に基づいて、入力された対話中の各発話または各表現単位のうち報告度の値の高い発話または表現単位を抽出し、それを繋げて要約を生成する(ステップB3)。なお、要約の生成方法は、抽出した表現単位を含む文を繋げるだけでなく、例えば、箇条書きのように単純に並べるといった方法や、主語を補ったり文末表現を追加、修正するといった元の文章の文脈を変えない補助的な編集作業を行った上で繋げるなどの方法も採り得る。 When the degree of reporting is calculated for each utterance or each expression unit in the input dialogue, the summary generation unit 102b performs the input during the dialogue based on the reporting degree of each utterance or each expression unit included in the inputted dialogue. Among the utterances or expression units, utterances or expression units having a high reporting level are extracted and connected to generate a summary (step B3). Note that the summary generation method not only connects the sentences containing the extracted expression units, but also, for example, a simple arrangement like a bulleted list, or the original sentence that supplements the subject or adds or corrects the sentence end expression. It is also possible to use a method such as connecting after performing auxiliary editing work that does not change the context of.

 最後に、出力手段400は、要約生成手段102bによって生成された要約を出力する(ステップB4)。 Finally, the output unit 400 outputs the summary generated by the summary generation unit 102b (step B4).

 以上のように、本実施形態では、報告度計算システムは、対話中の報告度の高い発話または表現箇所を抽出しそれを繋げて要約を生成する。そのため、報告度計算システムは、応対管理の現場の要求に適した、報告すべきポイントを押さえた品質の良い要約を生成することができる。 As described above, in the present embodiment, the reporting degree calculation system extracts utterances or expression parts having a high reporting degree during conversation and connects them to generate a summary. Therefore, the reporting degree calculation system can generate a high-quality summary that suppresses the points to be reported, which is suitable for the requirements of the site of reception management.

実施形態3.
 次に、本発明の第3の実施形態について図面を参照して説明する。図5は、本発明の第3の実施形態の構成例を示すブロック図である。図5に示すシステムは、例えば、報告作成支援システムとして実施される。図5に示すシステムは、プログラム制御により動作するコンピュータ100と、記憶媒体200と、入力手段300と、出力手段400とを備える。また、コンピュータ100は、報告度計算手段101cと、要約生成手段102cと、対話報告対登録手段103cとを含む。また、記憶手段200は、対話報告対記憶手段201cを含む。
Embodiment 3. FIG.
Next, a third embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of the third embodiment of the present invention. The system shown in FIG. 5 is implemented as a report creation support system, for example. The system shown in FIG. 5 includes a computer 100 that operates under program control, a storage medium 200, input means 300, and output means 400. The computer 100 also includes a report degree calculation unit 101c, a summary generation unit 102c, and a dialogue report pair registration unit 103c. The storage unit 200 includes a dialogue report pair storage unit 201c.

 本実施形態の構成は、図3に示す第2の実施形態の構成と比べて、コンピュータ100が対話報告対登録手段103cを含む点が異なっている。なお、本実施形態の報告度計算手段101c、要約生成手段102c、対話報告対記憶手段201cは、第2の実施形態における報告度計算手段101b、要約生成手段102b、対話報告対記憶手段201bと同様である。以下、第2の実施形態と同様のものについては説明を省略する。 The configuration of this embodiment is different from the configuration of the second embodiment shown in FIG. 3 in that the computer 100 includes a dialog report pair registration unit 103c. Note that the reporting degree calculation unit 101c, summary generation unit 102c, and dialogue report pair storage unit 201c of the present embodiment are the same as the reporting degree calculation unit 101b, summary generation unit 102b, and dialogue report pair storage unit 201b in the second embodiment. It is. Hereinafter, description of the same components as those in the second embodiment will be omitted.

 対話報告対登録手段103cは、入力手段300から報告文書が入力された際、逐次、入力された報告文書に対応する対話と対にして、対話報告対記憶手段201cに追加記憶する。 When the report document is input from the input unit 300, the dialog report pair registration unit 103c additionally stores the dialog report pair storage unit 201c in pairs with the dialog corresponding to the input report document.

 対話報告対登録手段103cは、例えば、過去に入力された対話の識別番号と同じ識別番号の報告文書が入力された場合に、それらを対にして対話報告対記憶手段201cに登録するようにしてもよい。また、例えば、対話の識別番号と報告文書の識別番号とが異なる場合には、対話報告対登録手段103cは、どの対話に対応する報告文書なのかを示す情報を含めて報告文書を入力するユーザ・インタフェースを提供することにより、対応関係を識別するようにしてもよい。また、例えば、対話報告対登録手段103cは、要約生成手段102bが生成した要約書を出力する際に、当該システムで割り当てた対話の識別番号を付した編集画面(ユーザが当該要約書を編集して報告文書を作成するための画面)を表示するようにし、ユーザが当該編集画面を介して報告文書を作成して保存する指示を入力した際に、対話の識別番号とともに報告文書を入力するようなユーザ・インタフェースを提供してもよい。 For example, when a report document having the same identification number as the dialog identification number input in the past is input, the dialog report pair registration unit 103c registers them in the dialog report pair storage unit 201c as a pair. Also good. For example, when the identification number of the dialogue and the identification number of the report document are different, the dialogue report pair registration unit 103c inputs the report document including information indicating which dialogue corresponds to the report document. A correspondence relationship may be identified by providing an interface. Further, for example, when the dialog report pair registration unit 103c outputs the summary generated by the summary generation unit 102b, the dialog report pair registration unit 103c edits the dialog with the dialog identification number assigned by the system (the user edits the summary). Screen to create a report document), and when the user inputs an instruction to create and save the report document via the edit screen, the report document is input together with the identification number of the dialog. A simple user interface may be provided.

 次に、本実施形態の報告作成支援システムの動作を説明する。図6は、本実施形態の報告作成支援システムの動作の一例を示すフローチャートである。なお、図6に示すステップC1~C3の動作は、基本的には図4に示した第2の実施形態におけるステップB1~B3と同様である。 Next, the operation of the report creation support system of this embodiment will be described. FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an example of the operation of the report creation support system of this embodiment. The operations in steps C1 to C3 shown in FIG. 6 are basically the same as those in steps B1 to B3 in the second embodiment shown in FIG.

 本例では、まず、入力手段300が、対話テキストを入力する(ステップC1)。次に、報告度計算手段101cは、入力された対話テキスト中の各表現部分が過去の応対においてどの程度報告されている内容に関する部分かの度合いである報告度を、対話報告対記憶手段201cに記憶された過去の応対の対話テキストと報告テキストの対の集合における、対話テキストの表現と報告テキストの表現の出現傾向に基づいて計算する(ステップC2)。 In this example, first, the input means 300 inputs a dialog text (step C1). Next, the reporting degree calculation unit 101c stores a reporting degree, which is a degree of how much each expression part in the inputted dialogue text is related to the contents reported in the past reception, in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c. Calculation is performed based on the appearance tendency of the expression of the dialog text and the expression of the report text in the set of the stored pairs of the dialog text and the report text of the past response (step C2).

 次に、要約生成手段102cは、対話テキスト中の、報告度の高い表現部分を含む文を抽出し、並べて要約テキストを生成する(ステップC3)。 Next, the summary generation means 102c extracts sentences including an expression part with a high degree of report in the dialogue text, and generates a summary text by arranging them (step C3).

 次に、出力手段400は、生成された要約テキストを出力する(ステップC4)。 Next, the output unit 400 outputs the generated summary text (step C4).

 次に、対話報告対登録手段103cは、出力手段400が要約テキストを出力した後、ユーザが作成した報告文書を逐次入力し、対応する対話とともに対で対話報告対記憶手段201cに追加記憶する(ステップC5)。 Next, after the output unit 400 outputs the summary text, the dialogue report pair registration unit 103c sequentially inputs report documents created by the user, and additionally stores them in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c in pairs with the corresponding dialogue ( Step C5).

 対話報告対登録手段103cは、例えば、出力した要約テキストを基に、ユーザがその要約テキストを参照または編集して作成した報告文書を入力するためのユーザ・インタフェースを提供してもよい。また、そのようなユーザ・インタフェースを介して報告文書が入力された場合に、対話報告対登録手段103cは、該報告文書に付されている対話の識別番号を基に、対話と報告文書とを対にして対話報告対記憶手段201cに追加記憶してもよい。 The interactive report pair registration unit 103c may provide a user interface for inputting a report document created by the user referring to or editing the summary text based on the output summary text, for example. In addition, when a report document is input via such a user interface, the dialog report pair registration unit 103c determines the dialog and the report document based on the dialog identification number attached to the report document. A pair may be additionally stored in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c.

 なお、対話の入力から報告文書の作成を一連の作業として実施する場合には、対話報告対登録手段103cは、ステップC1で入力された対話テキストと、ステップC5で入力された報告文書とを対にして、対話報告対記憶手段201cに記憶させればよい。 When creating a report document from a dialogue input as a series of operations, the dialogue report pair registration unit 103c pairs the dialogue text input in step C1 with the report document input in step C5. And stored in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c.

 以降、ステップC1からステップC5を、対話、報告文書の入力に応じて逐次、繰り返す。 Thereafter, step C1 to step C5 are sequentially repeated according to the input of the dialogue and the report document.

 以上のように、本実施形態では、報告作成支援システムは、応対管理の現場の要求に適した、報告すべきポイントを押さえた要約を利用者に提示する。そのため、報告作成支援システムは、利用者の報告文書作成における報告漏れの減少等の質的向上、作成時間の短縮を可能にすることができる。さらに、報告作成支援システムは、利用者が同要約を参照して作成した報告文書を入力して、次回以降の報告度の計算に反映するように構成されている。そのため、報告作成支援システムは、利用者の報告内容の選別における最新の判断に即した、品質の良い要約を生成可能とすることができる。 As described above, in the present embodiment, the report creation support system presents the user with a summary of the points to be reported that are suitable for the site management requirements. Therefore, the report creation support system can improve the quality such as the reduction of report omission in the creation of the report document of the user and shorten the creation time. Further, the report creation support system is configured to input a report document created by the user with reference to the summary and reflect it in the calculation of the report degree from the next time. Therefore, the report creation support system can generate a high-quality summary in accordance with the latest judgment in selecting the report contents of the user.

 次に、具体的な実施例を用いて本発明の実施形態について説明する。本実施例は、上述の第1の実施形態に対応するものである。 Next, embodiments of the present invention will be described using specific examples. This example corresponds to the first embodiment described above.

 まず、入力手段300は、要約の作成対象となる対話テキストを入力する(図4のステップA1)。図7は、入力手段300に入力される対話テキストの一例を示す説明図である。本実施例では、対話がテキストデータとして入力される場合を例にして説明を行うが、対話は、音声データとして入力されてもよい。その場合には、報告作成支援システムは、対話音声と、その音声認識結果である対話テキストとに対して以降の処理を行う。 First, the input means 300 inputs a dialog text for which a summary is to be created (step A1 in FIG. 4). FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the dialog text input to the input unit 300. In the present embodiment, the case where the dialogue is input as text data will be described as an example, but the dialogue may be input as voice data. In that case, the report creation support system performs the subsequent processing on the dialog voice and the dialog text that is the voice recognition result.

 次に、報告度計算手段101aは、入力された対話テキスト中の各表現部分が過去の応対においてどの程度報告されている内容に関する部分かの度合いである報告度を、対話報告対記憶手段201aに記憶された、過去の応対の対話テキストと報告テキストの対の集合における、対話テキストの表現と報告テキストの表現の出現傾向に基づいて計算する(ステップA2)。 Next, the reporting degree calculation means 101a stores in the dialogue report pair storage means 201a the degree of reporting, which is the degree to which each expression part in the inputted dialogue text is related to the content reported in the past response. A calculation is made based on the appearance tendency of the dialogue text expression and the report text expression in the set of the past dialogue text and report text pairs stored (step A2).

 ここで、対話テキスト中の各表現に対する報告度は、具体的には次のように計算することができる。まず、対話テキスト中の表現をw、報告テキスト中の表現をw’とする。また、仮想的な報告テキストを導入し、これをRとする。ここで、報告度計算手段101aは、入力された対話テキスト中の表現wに対する報告度を、その報告テキストRに表現wの内容が含意される確率P(w|R)として計算する。具体的には、報告度計算手段101aは、(w|R)を、対話表現wの報告内容への出現確率とみなし、以下の式(1)のように推定する。 Here, the degree of reporting for each expression in the dialog text can be specifically calculated as follows. First, let w be the expression in the dialog text and w 'be the expression in the report text. Also, a virtual report text is introduced and this is set as Rv . Here, the reporting degree calculation means 101a calculates the reporting degree for the expression w in the input dialog text as a probability P (w | R v ) that the report text R v implies the content of the expression w. Specifically, the reporting degree calculation unit 101a regards (w | R v ) as the appearance probability of the dialogue expression w in the report content, and estimates it as in the following equation (1).

P(w|R)=1/(wを含む応対数)×Σ{wを含む応対に対応する報告メモR}P(w|R)
 ・・・式(1)
P (w | R v ) = 1 / (response number including w) × Σ {report memo R corresponding to response including w} P (w | R)
... Formula (1)

 ここで、P(w|R)は以下の式(2)で推定するものとし、P(w|w’)は以下の式(3)で推定するものとする。 Here, P (w | R) is estimated by the following equation (2), and P (w | w ') is estimated by the following equation (3).

P(w|R)=1-Π{w’∈R}[1-P(w|w’)] ・・・式(2)
P(w|w’)=P(w,w’)/P(w’) ・・・式(3)
P (w | R) = 1−Π {w′∈R} [1-P (w | w ′)] (2)
P (w | w ′) = P (w, w ′) / P (w ′) (3)

 ただし、P(w,w’)は、表現wが対話中に出現し、かつ、表現w’が対応する報告テキストに出現する共起確率を表す。 However, P (w, w ′) represents the co-occurrence probability that the expression w appears during the dialogue and the expression w ′ appears in the corresponding report text.

 以上の計算の結果、報告度計算手段101aは、対話テキストの表現とその報告度を得る。ここで、対話テキスト中の表現wが、報告テキスト中では異なる表現w’を用いて記述されている場合であっても、対話テキスト中の表現wの報告度の計算に考慮される点に注意が必要である。 As a result of the above calculation, the reporting degree calculating means 101a obtains the dialogue text expression and the reporting degree. Note that even if the expression w in the dialog text is described using a different expression w ′ in the report text, it is taken into account for the calculation of the reporting degree of the expression w in the dialog text. is required.

 すなわち、この計算方法によれば、対話テキスト中の表現w自体が、同一の表現で報告されていなくても、内容として報告されるようであれば、報告度が高いと評価されるといった効果を有する。 That is, according to this calculation method, even if the expression w itself in the dialog text is not reported in the same expression, if it is reported as the content, the report is evaluated as having a high degree of reporting. Have.

 また、報告度を計算する際に、P(w|w’)の評価において、表現wと表現w’の組み合わせが過去の応対データ(対話テキストと報告テキストの対)の中に存在しない新規の表現対である場合には、0でない適切な確率値配分を与えることも可能である。このような確率値配分は、例えば、以下の文献に記載されているような「Mathed C」のスムージング手法を用いることにより付与可能である。 Further, when calculating the reporting degree, in the evaluation of P (w | w ′), a new combination in which the combination of the expression w and the expression w ′ does not exist in the past response data (dialog text and report text pair). In the case of an expression pair, it is also possible to give an appropriate probability value distribution that is not zero. Such a probability value distribution can be given by using, for example, a “Mathed C” smoothing technique as described in the following document.

 文献:Witthen, I.H. & Bell, T.C., "The zero-fequency probulem: Estimating the probabilities of novel events in adaptive text compression.", IEEE Transaction on Information Theory 37(4), 1991, p.1085-1094. Literature: Witthen, I.H. & Bell, T.C., "The zero-fequency probulem: Estimating the probabilities of novel events in adaptive text compression.", IEEE Transaction on Information Theory 37 (4), 1991, p.85.

 具体的には、以下の式(4)のように、P(w|w’)を推定することができる。 Specifically, P (w | w ′) can be estimated as in the following equation (4).

C(w,w’)>0の時、
P(w,w’)=C(w,w’)/(C(w’)+r(w’))
C(w,w’)=0の時、
P(w,w’)=r(w’)/(C(w’)+r(w’))
 ・・・式(4)
When C (w, w ′)> 0,
P (w, w ′) = C (w, w ′) / (C (w ′) + r (w ′))
When C (w, w ′) = 0
P (w, w ′) = r (w ′) / (C (w ′) + r (w ′))
... Formula (4)

 ここで、C(w,w’)は、対話テキストと報告テキストの対集合において、対話テキスト中に表現wが出現し、かつ、対応する報告テキスト中に表現w’が出現する頻度を表している。また、C(w’)は、報告テキスト中に表現w’が出現する頻度を表している。また、r(w’)は、対話テキスト中の表現wに対して、これまで、報告テキスト中に対応して出現した表現w’の異なり数を表している。 Here, C (w, w ′) represents the frequency in which the expression w appears in the dialog text and the expression w ′ appears in the corresponding report text in the pair set of the dialog text and the report text. Yes. C (w ′) represents the frequency of occurrence of the expression w ′ in the report text. Also, r (w ′) represents the number of different expressions w ′ that have appeared so far in the report text relative to the expression w in the dialog text.

 このようにP(w,w’)を評価することにより、表現wと表現w’の組み合わせが、過去の応対データ中に存在しない新規の表現対である場合でも、非0の確率値配分を与えることができ、その結果、新規の表現対であっても要約中の同表現を出力することができる。これは、過去の応対データ中において、対話テキスト中に出現するが報告テキスト中には全く表れてこないような表現よりも、新規の表現の方が高い報告度を得ることが可能となるからである。 By evaluating P (w, w ′) in this way, even when the combination of the expression w and the expression w ′ is a new expression pair that does not exist in the past reception data, non-zero probability value distribution is performed. As a result, even if it is a new expression pair, the same expression in the summary can be output. This is because, in the past response data, it is possible to obtain a higher degree of reporting with a new expression than an expression that appears in the dialog text but does not appear in the report text at all. is there.

 図11は、図7に示した対話テキストに対する報告文書の一例を示す説明図である。例えば、図7に示す対話中の発話「メールアカウントを増やしたいんだけど」における「増やす」が、図11に示す報告文書中の文「メールアカウントの増設をご希望」における別の表現「増設」を用いて報告されているといったことを適切に評価できる。 FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a report document for the dialog text shown in FIG. For example, “Increase” in the utterance “I want to increase the number of email accounts” during the dialogue shown in FIG. 7 is another expression “Increase” in the sentence “I want to increase the number of email accounts” in the report document shown in FIG. It can be appropriately evaluated that it is reported using.

 ステップA2では、例えば、対話テキスト中の表現単位を形態素とする場合には、図8に示すような各形態素(活用形は原形に変換)に対する報告度が得られる。図8は、対話テキスト中の各表現単位(形態素)に対して計算された報告度の一例を示す説明図である。図8には、例えば、「メールアカウント」という形態素の報告度が0.81と計算され、「増やす」という形態素の報告度が0.81と計算されたことが示されている。 In step A2, for example, when the expression unit in the dialog text is a morpheme, the degree of reporting is obtained for each morpheme (utilized form is converted to the original form) as shown in FIG. FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the degree of reporting calculated for each expression unit (morpheme) in the dialog text. FIG. 8 shows that, for example, the reporting degree of the morpheme “mail account” is calculated as 0.81, and the reporting degree of the morpheme “increase” is calculated as 0.81.

 最後に出力手段400は、対話中の各表現単位を報告度とともに出力する(ステップA3)。 Finally, the output unit 400 outputs each expression unit in the dialogue together with the report degree (step A3).

 出力手段400は、例えば、図8に示すような一覧の形式で、入力対話中の各表現単位をその報告度とともに出力してもよい。なお、出力手段400は、その際、報告度が所定の閾値以上であった表現単位のみを報告度とともに出力するようにしてもよい。また、例えば、報告度の算出を発話単位にした場合には、出力手段400は、入力対話中の各発話またはそのうちの所定の閾値以上の発話をその報告度とともに出力するようにしてもよい。なお、入力対話中の各発話の報告度の算出方法は、第2の実施例において説明している。 The output unit 400 may output each expression unit in the input dialogue together with the report degree in the form of a list as shown in FIG. At that time, the output unit 400 may output only the expression unit whose reporting degree is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold together with the reporting degree. In addition, for example, when the reporting degree is calculated in units of utterances, the output unit 400 may output each utterance during the input dialogue or an utterance of a predetermined threshold or more together with the reporting degree. Note that the method for calculating the degree of reporting of each utterance during the input dialogue is described in the second embodiment.

 以上のように、本実施例では、報告作成支援システムは、入力対話に含まれる各表現単位を抽出し、各表現単位に対して、報告文書中に報告すべき内容を含む程度である報告度を計算し、各表現単位を報告度とともに出力している。このため、利用者は入力通話における報告すべき内容部分を容易に把握することができる。 As described above, in this embodiment, the report creation support system extracts each expression unit included in the input dialogue, and the reporting degree is such that each expression unit includes the content to be reported in the report document. , And each expression unit is output together with the report level. For this reason, the user can easily grasp the content portion to be reported in the input call.

 次に、本発明の第2の実施例を説明する。本実施例は、上述した第2の実施形態に対応するものである。なお、ステップB1~B2までの動作は、第1の実施例において説明した第1の実施形態のステップA1~A2までの動作と同様である。 Next, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described. This example corresponds to the second embodiment described above. The operation from step B1 to B2 is the same as the operation from step A1 to A2 in the first embodiment described in the first example.

 本実施例では、さらに、要約生成手段102bが、対話テキスト中の表現部分のうち、報告度の高い表現部分を含む発話または表現単位を抽出し、並べて要約テキストを生成する。 In the present embodiment, the summary generation unit 102b further extracts utterances or expression units including an expression part having a high reporting degree from the expression parts in the dialog text, and generates the summary text side by side.

 ここで、報告度の高い発話を抽出するには、発話に対する報告度を計算し、所定の要約率または要約長を超えない範囲で、要約テキスト中に抽出される各発話の報告度の総和の値が最大となるように、抽出される発話の組み合わせを選択すればよい。 Here, in order to extract utterances with a high degree of reporting, the degree of reporting for the utterance is calculated, and the sum of the degree of reporting for each utterance extracted in the summary text is within a range that does not exceed the predetermined summary rate or summary length. What is necessary is just to select the combination of the utterances extracted so that a value may become the maximum.

 発話に対する報告度は、例えば、以下の式(5)に示すような、発話中の各形態素に対する報告度の総和を、発話の長さ(文字数)で正規化した値として求められる。 The degree of reporting for an utterance is obtained, for example, as a value obtained by normalizing the sum of the degree of reporting for each morpheme during the utterance as shown in the following formula (5).

(発話に対する報告度)=(発話中の各形態素に対する報告度の総和)/(発話中の文字数) ・・・式(5) (Reporting degree for utterance) = (Total sum of reporting degree for each morpheme during utterance) / (Number of characters in utterance) (5)

 すると、図9に示すような各発話に対する報告度が得られる。図9は、対話テキスト中の各表現単位(発話)に対して計算される報告度の一例を示す説明図である。図9には、例えば、「電話、結構待たされるね」という発話の報告度が0.52と計算され、「メールアカウントを増やしたいんだけど」という発話の報告度が0.46と計算されたことが示されている。 Then, the degree of reporting for each utterance as shown in FIG. 9 is obtained. FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the reporting degree calculated for each expression unit (utterance) in the dialog text. In FIG. 9, for example, the degree of reporting of the utterance “Thank you for a long time” is calculated as 0.52, and the degree of reporting of the utterance “I want to increase the number of email accounts” is calculated as 0.46. It has been shown.

 次に、要約生成手段102bが、所定の要約率または要約長を超えない範囲で、要約テキスト中に抽出される各発話の報告度の総和の値が最大となるように、抽出される発話の組み合わせを選択する。そして、要約生成手段102bは、選択した発話の組み合わせを並べて要約テキストを生成する(ステップB3)。 Next, the summary generation means 102b allows the utterances to be extracted so that the sum of the reporting levels of the utterances extracted in the summary text is maximized within a range not exceeding the predetermined summary rate or summary length. Select a combination. Then, the summary generation means 102b generates a summary text by arranging the selected combinations of utterances (step B3).

 ここで、例えば、要約長が文字数で120文字以内と定められている場合、要約生成手段102bは、図10に示すようなそれを超えない119文字の要約テキストを生成すればよい。図10は、生成される要約テキストの一例を示す説明図である。なお、図10に示すように、要約生成手段102bは、各発話が誰によるものなのか(本例の場合、クライアントによる発話かまたはオペレータによる発話か)を示す情報を併せて出力してもよい。 Here, for example, when the summary length is determined to be 120 characters or less, the summary generation means 102b may generate 119 character summary text not exceeding that as shown in FIG. FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the generated summary text. As shown in FIG. 10, the summary generation unit 102b may also output information indicating who each utterance is from (in this example, from a client or an operator). .

 最後に、出力手段400が、生成された要約テキストを出力する(ステップB4)。 Finally, the output unit 400 outputs the generated summary text (step B4).

 本実施例では、報告作成支援システムは、入力対話に含まれる各表現単位について計算した報告度に基づいて、実際に対話中の報告度の高い発話または表現箇所を要約に抽出している。このため、報告作成支援システムは、応対管理の現場の要求に適した、報告すべきポイントを押さえた品質の良い要約を生成可能とすることができる。また、報告作成支援システムは、生成した要約を出力することで、利用者がその要約を参照して容易に報告文書を作成することができ、これにより、利用者の報告文書作成における報告漏れの減少等の質的向上、作成時間の短縮を可能にする。 In the present embodiment, the report creation support system extracts, from the summary, utterances or expression points with a high reporting degree during the actual dialogue based on the degree of reporting calculated for each expression unit included in the input dialogue. For this reason, the report creation support system can generate a high-quality summary with the points to be reported, which is suitable for the requirements of the site of reception management. In addition, the report creation support system outputs the generated summary so that the user can easily create a report document by referring to the summary. It is possible to improve quality such as reduction and shorten creation time.

 次に、本発明の第3の実施例を説明する。本実施例は、上述した第3の実施形態に対応するものである。なお、ステップC1~C3までの動作は、第1および第2の実施例において説明したステップA1~A2およびステップB3の動作と同様である。 Next, a third embodiment of the present invention will be described. This example corresponds to the third embodiment described above. The operations from step C1 to C3 are the same as the operations from step A1 to A2 and step B3 described in the first and second embodiments.

 本実施例では、利用者が、例えば、第2の実施例におけるステップB3で出力した要約テキストを元に、報告文書を作成した場合に、入力手段300からこの報告文書を入力し、対話報告対登録手段103cは、この報告文書を、対応する対話とともに対で対話報告対記憶手段201cに追加記憶する(ステップC5)。 In this embodiment, for example, when the user creates a report document based on the summary text output in step B3 in the second embodiment, the user inputs this report document from the input means 300, and the dialogue report pair. The registration unit 103c additionally stores this report document in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c as a pair together with the corresponding dialogue (step C5).

 本実施例では、図11に示す報告文書が、図7に示した対話に対する報告文書として入力されたとする。すると、対話報告対登録手段103cは、この報告文書を、対応する対話(図7に示した対話)とともに対で対話報告対記憶手段201cに追加記憶する。本例では、対応する対話が、報告文書が入力されるより前の段階(本例では、ステップC1)で入力されているものとする。そして、報告作成支援システムは、ステップC1で、入力された対話を一時的に保持する記憶手段に識別番号とともに記憶しておくものとする。なお、一時的に保持するための記憶手段を、対話報告対記憶手段201cが兼ねていてもよい。 In this embodiment, it is assumed that the report document shown in FIG. 11 is input as the report document for the dialogue shown in FIG. Then, the dialogue report pair registration unit 103c additionally stores the report document together with the corresponding dialogue (dialog shown in FIG. 7) in the dialogue report pair storage unit 201c. In this example, it is assumed that the corresponding dialogue has been input at a stage (in this example, step C1) before the report document is input. In step C1, the report creation support system stores the input dialogue together with the identification number in a storage unit that temporarily holds the dialogue. The dialogue report pair storage unit 201c may also serve as a storage unit for temporarily holding the storage unit.

 本実施例では、報告作成支援システムは、応対管理の現場の要求に適した報告すべきポイントを押さえた要約を利用者に提示し、それを参照した利用者が作成した報告文書を即座に次回以降の報告度の算出に役立てることができる。これにより、報告作成支援システムは、利用者の報告書作成における報告内容の選別の最新の判断や、対話中の表現を報告文書中でどのように言い換えているか等の最新の変換手法をも反映させることができ、さらに品質の良い要約を生成可能とすることができる。 In this embodiment, the report creation support system presents the user with a summary of the points to be reported that are suitable for the site management requirements, and immediately reports the report document created by the user who referred to it. It can be used to calculate the degree of subsequent reporting. As a result, the report creation support system also reflects the latest conversion methods such as the latest judgment of the selection of report contents in the report creation by the user and how the expression during dialogue is paraphrased in the report document. And a higher quality summary can be generated.

 次に、本発明の概要について説明する。図12は、本発明の概要を示すブロック図である。図12に示すように、本発明による報告文書作成支援システムは、報告度計算手段11と、対話報告対記憶手段12とを備えている。 Next, the outline of the present invention will be described. FIG. 12 is a block diagram showing an outline of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 12, the report document creation support system according to the present invention includes a report degree calculation unit 11 and a dialogue report pair storage unit 12.

 対話報告対記憶手段12(例えば、対話報告対記憶手段201a、201b、201c)は、予め、対話とその内容を報告した文章である報告文書との対の集合を記憶する。 The dialogue report pair storage unit 12 (for example, dialogue report pair storage unit 201a, 201b, 201c) stores a set of pairs of a dialogue and a report document that is a sentence reporting the contents in advance.

 報告度計算手段11(例えば、報告度計算手段101a、101b、101c)は、対話報告対記憶手段12に記憶されている対話と報告文書の対の集合において対話中の各発話または表現単位の内容が対応する報告文書中に含まれている度合いに基づき、入力された対話から抽出される各発話または各表現単位について、当該発話または当該表現単位が報告文書において報告されるべき内容を含むかどうかの程度を表す報告度を計算する。 The reporting degree calculating means 11 (for example, the reporting degree calculating means 101a, 101b, 101c) is the contents of each utterance or expression unit in dialogue in the set of dialogue and report document pairs stored in the dialogue report pair storage means 12. For each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the input dialogue based on the degree to which is included in the corresponding report document, whether the utterance or the expression unit contains the content to be reported in the report document Calculate the degree of reporting that represents the degree of.

 報告度計算手段11は、入力された対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を、対話中の表現wが報告文書中では異なる表現w’として出現する確率である共起確率P(w,w’)を用いて算出した過去の対話中の同表現の報告文書への出現確率を基に計算してもよい。 The report degree calculation means 11 uses the input report degree of each utterance or expression unit in the dialogue as a probability of the occurrence of the expression w in the dialogue as a different representation w ′ in the report document. You may calculate based on the appearance probability to the report document of the same expression in the past dialog calculated using w ').

 また、図示省略しているが、報告文書作成支援システムは、報告度計算手段11によって計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を、該発話または表現単位とともに出力する報告度出力手段を備えていてもよい。 Although not shown, the report document creation support system outputs the report level of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue calculated by the report level calculation means 11 together with the utterance or expression unit. Means may be provided.

 また、報告度計算手段11によって計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を基に、入力対話から発話または表現単位を抽出して要約を生成する要約生成手段を備えていてもよい。 In addition, based on the degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue calculated by the reporting degree calculation unit 11, there may be provided summary generation means for extracting the utterance or expression unit from the input dialogue and generating a summary. Good.

 また、要約生成手段によって生成された要約を出力する要約出力手段と、出力された要約を基に作成された報告文書を逐次入力し、入力された報告文書と該報告文書に対応する対話とを対にして対話報告対記憶手段に追加記憶する対話報告対登録手段とを備えていてもよい。 Also, summary output means for outputting the summary generated by the summary generation means, report documents created based on the output summary are sequentially input, and the input report document and the dialog corresponding to the report document are provided. A dialog report pair registering unit that additionally stores the pair in the dialog report pair storing unit may be provided.

 また、対話をテキストデータで入力する対話入力手段を備え、対話から抽出される各発話または各表現単位は文字列データであってもよい。 Further, a dialog input means for inputting a dialog as text data may be provided, and each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialog may be character string data.

 また、対話を音声データで入力する対話入力手段と、入力された音声データからテキストデータを生成する音声認識手段とを備え、対話から抽出する各発話または各表現単位は音声データまたは文字列データであってもよい。 In addition, a dialogue input means for inputting a dialogue as voice data and a voice recognition means for generating text data from the inputted voice data, each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialogue is voice data or character string data. There may be.

 また、要約生成手段は、報告度を基に入力された対話から抽出した音声データまたは文字列データの発話または表現単位を用いて、テキストデータの要約を生成してもよい。 Further, the summary generation means may generate a summary of the text data by using the speech data or character string data utterance or expression unit extracted from the dialogue input based on the report level.

 以上、実施形態及び実施例を参照して本願発明を説明したが、本願発明は上記実施形態および実施例に限定されるものではない。本願発明の構成や詳細には、本願発明のスコープ内で当業者が理解し得る様々な変更をすることができる。 As mentioned above, although this invention was demonstrated with reference to embodiment and an Example, this invention is not limited to the said embodiment and Example. Various changes that can be understood by those skilled in the art can be made to the configuration and details of the present invention within the scope of the present invention.

 この出願は、2011年1月17日に出願された日本特許出願2011-007170を基礎とする優先権を主張し、その開示の全てをここに取り込む。 This application claims priority based on Japanese Patent Application 2011-007170 filed on January 17, 2011, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein.

 本発明は、コンタクトセンターにおける通話音声からの報告文作成支援や、テキストマイニングや検索用の通話テキストのクレンジング、FAQ作成支援といった用途に好適に適用可能である。 The present invention can be suitably applied to uses such as report creation support from call voice in a contact center, cleansing of call text for text mining and search, and FAQ creation support.

 100 コンピュータ(中央処理装置;プロセッサ;データ処理装置)
 11、101a、101b、101c 報告度計算手段
 102b、102c 要約生成手段
 12、103c 対話報告対登録手段
 200 記憶媒体
 201a、201b、201c 対話報告対記憶手段
 300 入力手段
 400 出力手段
100 computer (central processing unit; processor; data processing unit)
11, 101a, 101b, 101c Report degree calculation means 102b, 102c Summary generation means 12, 103c Dialog report pair registration means 200 Storage medium 201a, 201b, 201c Dialog report pair storage means 300 Input means 400 Output means

Claims (10)

 予め、対話とその内容を報告した文章である報告文書との対の集合を記憶する対話報告対記憶手段と、
 前記対話報告対記憶手段に記憶されている対話と報告文書の対の集合において対話中の各発話または表現単位の内容が対応する報告文書中に含まれている度合いに基づき、入力された対話から抽出される各発話または各表現単位について、当該発話または当該表現単位が報告文書において報告されるべき内容を含むかどうかの程度を表す報告度を計算する報告度計算手段とを備えた
 ことを特徴とする報告文書作成支援システム。
Dialog report pair storage means for storing a set of pairs of a dialogue and a report document that is a sentence that reports the contents in advance;
Based on the degree to which the contents of each utterance or expression unit in dialogue in the set of dialogue and report document pairs stored in the dialogue report pair storage means are included in the corresponding report document, from the inputted dialogue For each utterance or each expression unit to be extracted, there is provided a reporting degree calculation means for calculating a degree of reporting indicating whether or not the utterance or the expression unit includes contents to be reported in the report document. Report document creation support system.
 報告度計算手段によって計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を、該発話または表現単位とともに出力する報告度出力手段を備えた
 請求項1に記載の報告文書作成支援システム。
The report document creation support system according to claim 1, further comprising reporting degree output means for outputting the degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue calculated by the reporting degree calculation means together with the utterance or expression unit.
 報告度計算手段によって計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を基に、入力対話から発話または表現単位を抽出して要約を生成する要約生成手段を備えた
 請求項1または請求項2に記載の報告文書作成支援システム。
The summarization generating means for extracting the utterance or expression unit from the input dialog and generating a summary based on the reporting degree of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialog calculated by the reporting degree calculation means. Item 3. The report document creation support system according to item 2.
 要約生成手段によって生成された要約を出力する要約出力手段と、
 出力された要約を基に作成された報告文書を逐次入力し、入力された報告文書と該報告文書に対応する対話とを対にして対話報告対記憶手段に追加記憶する対話報告対登録手段とを備えた
 請求項3に記載の報告文書作成支援システム。
Summary output means for outputting the summary generated by the summary generation means;
Dialog report pair registration means for sequentially inputting report documents created based on the output summary, and additionally storing the input report document and dialog corresponding to the report document in the dialog report pair storage means A report document creation support system according to claim 3.
 報告度計算手段は、入力された対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を、対話中の表現wが報告文書中では異なる表現w’として出現する確率である共起確率P(w,w’)を用いて算出した過去の対話中の同表現の報告文書への出現確率を基に計算する
 請求項1から請求項4のうちのいずれか1項に記載の報告文書作成支援システム。
The reporting degree calculation means uses the input reporting degree of each utterance or expression unit during dialogue as a co-occurrence probability P (w, w, which is a probability that the expression w during dialogue appears as a different expression w ′ in the report document. The report document creation support system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the report document creation support system calculates the occurrence probability of the same expression in a report document during a past dialogue calculated using ').
 対話をテキストデータで入力する対話入力手段を備え、
 対話から抽出する各発話または各表現単位は文字列データである
 請求項1から請求項5のうちのいずれか1項に記載の報告文書作成支援システム。
A dialog input means for inputting a dialog as text data is provided.
The report document creation support system according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialogue is character string data.
 対話を音声データで入力する対話入力手段と、
 入力された音声データからテキストデータを生成する音声認識手段とを備え、
 対話から抽出する各発話または各表現単位は音声データまたは文字列データである
 請求項1から請求項5のうちのいずれか1項に記載の報告文書作成支援システム。
A dialog input means for inputting a dialog by voice data;
Voice recognition means for generating text data from the input voice data,
The report document creation support system according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the dialogue is voice data or character string data.
 入力された音声データからテキストデータを生成する音声認識手段を備える報告文書作成支援システムであって、
 要約生成手段は、報告度を基に入力された対話から抽出した音声データまたは文字列データの発話または表現単位を用いて、テキストデータの要約を生成する
 請求項6または請求項7に記載の報告文書作成支援システム。
A report document creation support system comprising speech recognition means for generating text data from input speech data,
8. The report according to claim 6, wherein the summary generation means generates a summary of the text data using a speech or expression unit of speech data or character string data extracted from the dialogue input based on the degree of reporting. Document creation support system.
 予め、対話とその内容を報告した文章である報告文書との対の集合を記憶手段に記憶しておき、
 前記記憶手段に記憶されている対話と報告文書の対の集合において対話中の各発話または表現単位の内容が対応する報告文書中に含まれている度合いに基づき、入力された対話から抽出される各発話または各表現単位について、当該発話または当該表現単位が報告文書において報告されるべき内容を含むかどうかの程度を表す報告度を計算し、
 計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を、該発話または表現単位とともに出力する、または、計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を基に入力対話から発話または表現単位を抽出して要約を生成する
 ことを特徴とする報告文書作成支援方法。
In advance, the storage means stores a set of pairs of dialogue and a report document, which is a sentence that reports the contents,
Based on the degree to which the content of each utterance or expression unit in the dialogue in the set of dialogue and report document pairs stored in the storage means is included in the corresponding report document, it is extracted from the inputted dialogue. For each utterance or each expression unit, calculate a degree of reporting that indicates the extent to which the utterance or the expression unit contains content to be reported in the report document,
Output the degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit in the calculated input dialogue together with the utterance or expression unit, or utterance from the input dialogue based on the degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit in the calculated input dialogue Alternatively, a report document creation support method characterized by extracting a representation unit and generating a summary.
 コンピュータに、
 記憶手段に記憶されている対話とその内容を報告した文章である報告文書の対の集合において対話中の各発話または表現単位の内容が対応する報告文書中に含まれている度合いに基づき、入力された対話から抽出される各発話または各表現単位について、当該発話または当該表現単位が報告文書において報告されるべき内容を含むかどうかの程度を表す報告度を計算する処理、および
 計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を、該発話または表現単位とともに出力する、または、計算された入力対話中の各発話または表現単位の報告度を基に入力対話から発話または表現単位を抽出して要約を生成する処理
 を実行させるための報告文書作成支援プログラム。
On the computer,
Input based on the degree to which the content of each utterance or expression unit in the dialogue is included in the corresponding report document in the set of pairs of dialogue documents and the sentences that report the contents stored in the storage means. For each utterance or each expression unit extracted from the spoken dialogue, a process for calculating the degree of reporting that represents the extent to which the utterance or the expression unit contains content to be reported in the report document, and the calculated input Output the degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit in the dialogue together with the utterance or expression unit, or select the utterance or expression unit from the input dialogue based on the calculated degree of reporting of each utterance or expression unit in the input dialogue. A report document creation support program for executing the process of extracting and generating a summary.
PCT/JP2012/000141 2011-01-17 2012-01-12 Report document creation assistance system, report document creation assistance method, and report document creation assistance program Ceased WO2012098838A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2012553601A JPWO2012098838A1 (en) 2011-01-17 2012-01-12 Report document creation support system, report document creation support method, and report document creation support program

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011007170 2011-01-17
JP2011-007170 2011-01-17

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012098838A1 true WO2012098838A1 (en) 2012-07-26

Family

ID=46515474

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2012/000141 Ceased WO2012098838A1 (en) 2011-01-17 2012-01-12 Report document creation assistance system, report document creation assistance method, and report document creation assistance program

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JPWO2012098838A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012098838A1 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1153396A (en) * 1997-07-29 1999-02-26 Just Syst Corp Document processing apparatus, storage medium storing document processing program, and document processing method
JP2004086805A (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-18 Ricoh Co Ltd Word appearance calculation device, document search device, keyword extraction device, document summarization device, document classification device, program, and storage medium
WO2009113457A1 (en) * 2008-03-12 2009-09-17 日本電気株式会社 Text mining device, text mining method, text mining program, and recording medium

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH1153396A (en) * 1997-07-29 1999-02-26 Just Syst Corp Document processing apparatus, storage medium storing document processing program, and document processing method
JP2004086805A (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-18 Ricoh Co Ltd Word appearance calculation device, document search device, keyword extraction device, document summarization device, document classification device, program, and storage medium
WO2009113457A1 (en) * 2008-03-12 2009-09-17 日本電気株式会社 Text mining device, text mining method, text mining program, and recording medium

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
JUNJI YANO: "Performance Evaluation for a Method of Generating Business Reports from Call Center Speech Dialogues", IPSJ SIG NOTES, vol. 2007, no. 35, 29 March 2007 (2007-03-29), pages 21 - 28 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2012098838A1 (en) 2014-06-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4901738B2 (en) Machine learning
US8370155B2 (en) System and method for real time support for agents in contact center environments
US8644488B2 (en) System and method for automatically generating adaptive interaction logs from customer interaction text
JP5774459B2 (en) Discourse summary template creation system and discourse summary template creation program
JP6618992B2 (en) Statement presentation device, statement presentation method, and program
WO2011093025A1 (en) Input support system, method, and program
KR102030551B1 (en) Instant messenger driving apparatus and operating method thereof
JP5025353B2 (en) Dialog processing apparatus, dialog processing method, and computer program
JP2012003702A (en) Talk script use state calculation system and talk script use state calculation program
JP2009175336A (en) Call center database system, information management method thereof, and information management program
US20150179165A1 (en) System and method for caller intent labeling of the call-center conversations
JP5495967B2 (en) Discourse summary generation system and discourse summary generation program
JP5574842B2 (en) FAQ candidate extraction system and FAQ candidate extraction program
JP6254504B2 (en) Search server and search method
WO2022185363A1 (en) Label assignment assistance device, label assignment assistance method, and program
JP2010182191A (en) Business form input device, business form input system, business form input method, and program
JP2014106551A (en) Talk script extraction device, method, and program
JP5341732B2 (en) Discourse summary generation system and discourse summary generation program
CN109618067A (en) Outbound call dialogue processing method and system
JPWO2014208298A1 (en) Text classification device, text classification method, and text classification program
JP6639431B2 (en) Item judgment device, summary sentence display device, task judgment method, summary sentence display method, and program
JP5457284B2 (en) Discourse breakdown calculation system and discourse breakdown calculation program
JP2026000240A (en) Minutes creation support device and program
WO2012098838A1 (en) Report document creation assistance system, report document creation assistance method, and report document creation assistance program
JP2014130613A (en) Discourse summary generation system and discourse summary generation program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12736640

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2012553601

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12736640

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1