WO2012061027A1 - Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization - Google Patents
Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2012061027A1 WO2012061027A1 PCT/US2011/057072 US2011057072W WO2012061027A1 WO 2012061027 A1 WO2012061027 A1 WO 2012061027A1 US 2011057072 W US2011057072 W US 2011057072W WO 2012061027 A1 WO2012061027 A1 WO 2012061027A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- hydrate
- hydrates
- releasing agent
- well
- hydrocarbons
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B41/00—Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
- E21B41/005—Waste disposal systems
- E21B41/0057—Disposal of a fluid by injection into a subterranean formation
- E21B41/0064—Carbon dioxide sequestration
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B41/00—Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00
- E21B41/0099—Equipment or details not covered by groups E21B15/00 - E21B40/00 specially adapted for drilling for or production of natural hydrate or clathrate gas reservoirs; Drilling through or monitoring of formations containing gas hydrates or clathrates
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02C—CAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
- Y02C20/00—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
- Y02C20/40—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an improved method for recovering hydrocarbons trapped in hydrate formations.
- a number of hydrocarbons, especially lower boiling-point light hydrocarbons, in formation fluids or natural gas, are known to form hydrates in conjunction with the water present under a variety of conditions— particularly at a combination of lower temperature and higher pressure.
- the hydrates are solid crystalline compounds which co-exist with the surrounding porous media or natural gas fluids. Any solids in formation or natural gas fluids are at the least a nuisance for production, handling, and transport of these fluids. It is not uncommon for solid hydrates to cause plugging and/or blockage of pipelines or transfer lines or other conduits, valves and/or safety devices and/or other equipment, resulting in shutdown, loss of production, and risk of explosion or unintended release of hydrocarbons into the environment either on-land or offshore. Accordingly, hydrocarbon hydrates have been of substantial interest as well as concern to many industries, particularly the petroleum and natural gas industries.
- Natural gas hydrates are in a class of compounds known as clathrates, and are also referred to as inclusion compounds.
- Clathrates consist of cage structures formed between a host molecule and a guest molecule.
- Gas hydrates are generally composed of crystals formed by water host molecules surrounding the hydrocarbon guest molecules.
- the smaller or lower-boiling hydrocarbon molecules, particularly Q (methane) to C 4 hydrocarbons and their mixtures, are often the most problematic in the oil and gas industry because they form in hydrate or clathrate crystals under a wide range of production conditions. Even certain non-hydrocarbons such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide are known to form hydrates under the proper conditions. Beyond being a problem for production of hydrocarbons, hydrates are being looked at as a possible energy source.
- hydrate depressurization provides significant economical and process benefits over thermal heating or inhibitor injection. Hydrate bearing layers are subjected to pressure from the hydrostatic pressure of the overburden. Hydrate depressurization decreases the pressure at the hydrate interface, so that the hydrate equilibrium temperature is below that of the surroundings temperature, inducing dissociation.
- the hydrate production from depressurization suffers from several limitations including, but not limited to: significant production of water, endothermic cooling, and loss of geomechanical stability as hydrates dissociate.
- depressurizing inside the well will not necessarily lead to depressurization of the entire methane hydrate-bearing layer.
- the releasing agent is preferably a hydrate-forming fluid which is thermodynamically more stable under system conditions than the natural gas hydrate. This has been most studied with carbon dioxide (often in liquid form) as the releasing agent. Injection of carbon dioxide has been shown to release the natural gas in the hydrate while simultaneously sequestering the carbon dioxide in the hydrate cages. This process only requires the injection of a releasing agent and is therefore less energy intensive then conventional methods. In addition, because the releasing agent enters the hydrate and exchanges with natural gas, bulk hydrate dissociation is not thought to occur, mitigating the destabilization risk posed by hydrate dissociation during production.
- a method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates includes: (a) drilling a well into a subterranean formation; (b) introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation; (c) causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate; (d) selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons into the well without melting the gas hydrates; and (e) reducing the pressure in the well to selectively dissociate the hydrates with a desired methan
- a method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates comprising: (a) drilling a well into a subterranean formation; (b) introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation, wherein the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof; (c)causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate; (d) selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbon
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention.
- Methane hydrate conversion to carbon dioxide hydrate requires an understanding of hydrodynamics of carbon dioxide injection and transport to the methane hydrate accumulation; along with thermodynamics of formation and dissociation of the hydrates of methane
- the releasing agent is a compound that forms a thermodynamically more stable than the gas hydrates originally contained within the well.
- the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof.
- the releasing agent is gaseous carbon dioxide.
- the releasing agent is liquid.
- the releasing agent is liquid carbon dioxide.
- the hydrate releasing agent mixture becomes more stable based on the thermodynamic pressure-temperature relationship (i.e. for a given temperature, the hydrate will remain stable at lower pressures).
- the stability of the hydrate refers to the pressure at which it dissociates at a given pressure. The more stable the hydrate, the lower this pressure will be.
- the pressure of the well can be reduced to selectively dissociate only hydrates with a desired methane content.
- the original in- place hydrate is less stable than the hydrate following exchange with the releasing agent.
- hydrates will become increasingly stable based on the exposure conditions to the releasing agent (e.g. exposure time, composition of releasing agent in pore space). Therefore, based on the exposure time of the hydrate to the releasing agent, the pressure in which the well is depressurized to will only cause partial hydrate dissociation.
- the amount of free water created is also simultaneously controlled by the well operating pressure.
- part of the hydrate is selectively dissociated with the simultaneous reformation of the releasing agent hydrate. This method minimizes loss of geomechanical stability which can occur in known depressurization production techniques.
- FIG. 1 discloses a pictorial representation of one operating context of the invention.
- Well 18 generally comprises a superstructure 20 and a casing string located in the well down to the reservoir interval of interest 22.
- Well 18 was previously used to produce oil and/or gas from a subterranean reservoir 24 via lower perforations 26 in casing 22.
- the well is drilled for hydrate production.
- a plug 28 is inserted into casing 22 above perforations 26 and immediately below a gas hydrate formation 30.
- the casing 22 and the perforations 26 create a subterranean channel, which provides access to the hydrates in question.
- the gas hydrate is a methane hydrate.
- Upper perforations 32 are created in casing 22 above plug 28 and proximate to hydrate formation 30.
- the perforations 32 open up the well bore to the reservoir through the casing, which allows on to reduce the pressure in the hydrate formation 30 around the well 18 and induce an initial dissociation of the gas hydrates.
- carbon dioxide is injected into the formation.
- the carbon dioxide, i.e., the releasing agent, from carbon dioxide supply 34 can be introduced into casing 22 via a carbon dioxide pump 36.
- the injected carbon dioxide will form hydrate from the free water left as a result of dissociation.
- the carbon dioxide is injected in a controlled manner so as to selectively dissociate the methane-rich hydrates.
- carbon dixoide As carbon dixoide is injected into the formation, it will both form a pure carbon dioxide hydrate from the free water and also exchange with the methane in the existing hydrate formation creating a more stable hydrate.
- the reformation of the hydrate from the carbon dioxide serves to sequester it and reduce the produced free water. Because the hydrate formation is exothermic, this also counters the cooling from the hydrate dissociation. In addition, because hydrate is formed, the loss in geomechanical strength of the hydrate-bearing sediments should be minimized.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to an improved method for recovering hydrocarbons trapped in hydrate formations.
Description
SELECTIVE HYDRATE PRODUCTION WITH C02 AND CONTROLLED
DEPRESSURIZATION
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) to U.S.
Provisional Patent Serial No. 61/406,261 filed on October 25, 2010 the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to an improved method for recovering hydrocarbons trapped in hydrate formations.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] A number of hydrocarbons, especially lower boiling-point light hydrocarbons, in formation fluids or natural gas, are known to form hydrates in conjunction with the water present under a variety of conditions— particularly at a combination of lower temperature and higher pressure. The hydrates are solid crystalline compounds which co-exist with the surrounding porous media or natural gas fluids. Any solids in formation or natural gas fluids are at the least a nuisance for production, handling, and transport of these fluids. It is not uncommon for solid hydrates to cause plugging and/or blockage of pipelines or transfer lines or other conduits, valves and/or safety devices and/or other equipment, resulting in shutdown, loss of production, and risk of explosion or unintended release of hydrocarbons into the environment either on-land or offshore. Accordingly, hydrocarbon hydrates have been of substantial interest as well as concern to many industries, particularly the petroleum and natural gas industries.
[0004] Natural gas hydrates are in a class of compounds known as clathrates, and are also referred to as inclusion compounds. Clathrates consist of cage structures formed between a host molecule and a guest molecule. Gas hydrates are generally composed of crystals formed by water host molecules surrounding the hydrocarbon guest molecules. The smaller or lower-boiling hydrocarbon molecules, particularly Q (methane) to C4 hydrocarbons and their mixtures, are often the most problematic in the oil and gas industry because they form in hydrate or clathrate crystals under a wide range of production conditions. Even certain non-hydrocarbons such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide are known to form hydrates under the proper conditions.
Beyond being a problem for production of hydrocarbons, hydrates are being looked at as a possible energy source.
[0005] Known production strategies of hydrocarbons from hydrates have mainly focused on dissociation of the hydrate to release the trapped hydrocarbons. These known methods of dissociation of hydrates are based on shifting the thermodynamic equilibrium, which can be achieved by: increasing the system temperature above the temperature of hydrate formation at a specified pressure; decreasing the system pressure below the pressure of hydrate formation at a specified temperature; or injecting inhibitors such as methanol to shift the pressure-temperature equilibrium. However, there are two major problems with these known methods. First, these known methods can require a large amount of energy to be added to the system, especially in heating methods, resulting in a high cost of extraction. Second, they destabilize hydrate formations because both depressurization and heating cause the hydrate to dissociate. This can lead to the destabilization and/or collapse of sediments that contain hydrates and other nearby subterranean reservoirs. Because gas hydrates are often located near oil and natural gas deposits, such instability during extraction can result in problems with the extraction of oil and natural gas.
[0006] Of the known hydrate production methods being explored, hydrate depressurization provides significant economical and process benefits over thermal heating or inhibitor injection. Hydrate bearing layers are subjected to pressure from the hydrostatic pressure of the overburden. Hydrate depressurization decreases the pressure at the hydrate interface, so that the hydrate equilibrium temperature is below that of the surroundings temperature, inducing dissociation. However, the hydrate production from depressurization suffers from several limitations including, but not limited to: significant production of water, endothermic cooling, and loss of geomechanical stability as hydrates dissociate. Furthermore, depressurizing inside the well will not necessarily lead to depressurization of the entire methane hydrate-bearing layer.
[0007] An alternative process for the extraction of natural gas hydrates has been identified using a releasing agent. The releasing agent is preferably a hydrate-forming fluid which is thermodynamically more stable under system conditions than the natural gas hydrate. This has been most studied with carbon dioxide (often in liquid form) as the releasing agent. Injection of carbon dioxide has been shown to release the natural gas in the hydrate while simultaneously sequestering the carbon dioxide in the hydrate cages. This process only requires the injection of a releasing agent and is therefore less energy intensive then conventional
methods. In addition, because the releasing agent enters the hydrate and exchanges with natural gas, bulk hydrate dissociation is not thought to occur, mitigating the destabilization risk posed by hydrate dissociation during production.
[0008] Therefore, a need exists for a method that mitigates the significant production of water, the endothermic cooling, and the loss of geomechanical stability as hydrates dissociate during the hydrate depressurization process while simultaneously providing environmentally and economically positive consequences of sequestering carbon dioxide in the form of gas hydrate.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] In an embodiment, a method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates, the method includes: (a) drilling a well into a subterranean formation; (b) introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation; (c) causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate; (d) selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons into the well without melting the gas hydrates; and (e) reducing the pressure in the well to selectively dissociate the hydrates with a desired methane content.
[0010] In another embodiment, a method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates the method comprising: (a) drilling a well into a subterranean formation; (b) introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation, wherein the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof; (c)causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate; (d) selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the
hydrocarbons into the well without melting the gas hydrates; and (e) reducing the pressure in the well to selectively dissociate the hydrates with a desired methane content.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] The invention, together with further advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
[0012] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0013] Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of the present invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not as a limitation of the invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used on another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover such modifications and variations that come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
[0014] Methane hydrate conversion to carbon dioxide hydrate requires an understanding of hydrodynamics of carbon dioxide injection and transport to the methane hydrate accumulation; along with thermodynamics of formation and dissociation of the hydrates of methane
[0015] In order to recover sequestered methane gas from within a subterranean formation containing a gas hydrates, one or more wells are drilled into the subterranean formation. A casing string is cemented within the subterranean formation and one or more windows or perforations are opened directly into the area of the formation containing the gas hydrates. At this point, the releasing agent (e.g., carbon dioxide) is injected into the formation. The releasing agent contacts the gas hydrate, resulting in the releasing agent spontaneously (i.e., without the need for added energy) replacing the gas within the formation without requiring a significant change in the temperature, pressure, or volume of the hydrate. As used herein, the releasing
agent is a compound that forms a thermodynamically more stable than the gas hydrates originally contained within the well. In an embodiment, the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof. In another embodiment, the releasing agent is gaseous carbon dioxide. In another embodiment, the releasing agent is liquid. In yet another embodiment, the releasing agent is liquid carbon dioxide.
[0016] As the hydrate becomes enriched in the releasing agent, the hydrate releasing agent mixture becomes more stable based on the thermodynamic pressure-temperature relationship (i.e. for a given temperature, the hydrate will remain stable at lower pressures). The stability of the hydrate refers to the pressure at which it dissociates at a given pressure. The more stable the hydrate, the lower this pressure will be.
[0017] After an initial period of releasing agent exchange, the pressure of the well can be reduced to selectively dissociate only hydrates with a desired methane content. The original in- place hydrate is less stable than the hydrate following exchange with the releasing agent. Further, hydrates will become increasingly stable based on the exposure conditions to the releasing agent (e.g. exposure time, composition of releasing agent in pore space). Therefore, based on the exposure time of the hydrate to the releasing agent, the pressure in which the well is depressurized to will only cause partial hydrate dissociation. With hydrate dissociation selectively limited, the amount of free water created (due to hydrate dissociation) is also simultaneously controlled by the well operating pressure. Thus, part of the hydrate is selectively dissociated with the simultaneous reformation of the releasing agent hydrate. This method minimizes loss of geomechanical stability which can occur in known depressurization production techniques.
[0018] Turning now to the drawings wherein like numerals indicate like parts, FIG. 1 discloses a pictorial representation of one operating context of the invention. FIG. 1 illustrates an oil or natural gas well 18 that has been modified to employ the present inventive methodology. Well 18 generally comprises a superstructure 20 and a casing string located in the well down to the reservoir interval of interest 22. Well 18 was previously used to produce oil and/or gas from a subterranean reservoir 24 via lower perforations 26 in casing 22. In an embodiment, the well is drilled for hydrate production. After production of the oil and/or gas from subterranean reservoir 24 has been completed, a plug 28 is inserted into casing 22 above perforations 26 and immediately below a gas hydrate formation 30. The casing 22 and the perforations 26 create a
subterranean channel, which provides access to the hydrates in question. In an embodiment, the gas hydrate is a methane hydrate.
[0019] Upper perforations 32 are created in casing 22 above plug 28 and proximate to hydrate formation 30. The perforations 32 open up the well bore to the reservoir through the casing, which allows on to reduce the pressure in the hydrate formation 30 around the well 18 and induce an initial dissociation of the gas hydrates. As the initial dissociate begins to occur, carbon dioxide is injected into the formation. The carbon dioxide, i.e., the releasing agent, from carbon dioxide supply 34 can be introduced into casing 22 via a carbon dioxide pump 36. As the methane from the dissociated hydrate is produced, the injected carbon dioxide will form hydrate from the free water left as a result of dissociation. The carbon dioxide is injected in a controlled manner so as to selectively dissociate the methane-rich hydrates. As carbon dixoide is injected into the formation, it will both form a pure carbon dioxide hydrate from the free water and also exchange with the methane in the existing hydrate formation creating a more stable hydrate. The reformation of the hydrate from the carbon dioxide serves to sequester it and reduce the produced free water. Because the hydrate formation is exothermic, this also counters the cooling from the hydrate dissociation. In addition, because hydrate is formed, the loss in geomechanical strength of the hydrate-bearing sediments should be minimized.
[0020] The preferred embodiment of the present invention has been disclosed and illustrated. However, the invention is intended to be as broad as defined in the claims below. Those skilled in the art may be able to study the preferred embodiments and identify other ways to practice the invention that are not exactly as described in the present invention. It is the intent of the inventors that variations and equivalents of the invention are within the scope of the claims below and the description, abstract and drawings not to be used to limit the scope of the invention.
References
[0021] All of the references cited herein are expressly incorporated by reference. The discussion of any reference is not an admission that it is prior art to the present invention, especially any reference that may have a publication data after the priority date of this application. Incorporated references are listed again here for convenience:
1. U.S. Pat. No. 7,222,673, Graue et al., "Production of Free Gas by Gas Hydrate Conversion."
Claims
1. A method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates, the method comprising:
a. drilling a well into a subterranean formation;
b. introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation;
c. causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate;
d. selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons into the well without melting the gas hydrates; and
e. reducing the pressure in the well to selectively dissociate the hydrates with a desired methane content.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the gas hydrate is a methane hydrate.
4. A method for the producing hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation containing gas hydrates, the method comprising:
a. drilling a well into a subterranean formation;
b. introducing a releasing agent into the well in a controlled manner to partially depressurize the well, wherein the releasing agent is more thermodynamically stable than the gas hydrates present in the formation, wherein the releasing agent is selected from a group consisting of carbon dioxide, ethane, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, and mixtures thereof; c. causing the releasing agent to contact the gas hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons in the well without melting the gas hydrate;
d. selectively substituting the releasing agent for the hydrocarbons to thereby release the hydrocarbons from solid-state hydrate structure s without melting the gas hydrates, thereby providing substituted hydrates comprising the releasing agent bound with the solid-state hydrate structures that form hydrates, thereby releasing the hydrocarbons into the well without melting the gas hydrates; and
e. reducing the pressure in the well to selectively dissociate the hydrates with a desired methane content.
The method according to claim 5, wherein the releasing agent is in liquid phase when contacted with the gas hydrates.
The method according to claim 5, wherein the gas hydrate is a methane hydrate.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US40626110P | 2010-10-25 | 2010-10-25 | |
| US61/406,261 | 2010-10-25 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2012061027A1 true WO2012061027A1 (en) | 2012-05-10 |
Family
ID=45971989
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2011/057072 Ceased WO2012061027A1 (en) | 2010-10-25 | 2011-10-20 | Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20120097401A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2012061027A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2019520498A (en) * | 2016-07-06 | 2019-07-18 | エイカー ソリューションズ エーエス | Submarine methane production assembly |
| US10968707B2 (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2021-04-06 | Aker Solutions As | Subsea methane hydrate production |
| CN113431534A (en) * | 2021-08-09 | 2021-09-24 | 北京科技大学 | Low-permeability compact reservoir CO2Huff and puff well selection method |
| US11225858B2 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2022-01-18 | Jgc Corporation | Methane gas production facility and methane gas production method |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9243451B2 (en) * | 2012-02-10 | 2016-01-26 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | System and method for pre-conditioning a hydrate reservoir |
| US9322250B2 (en) | 2013-08-15 | 2016-04-26 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | System for gas hydrate production and method thereof |
| WO2016133470A1 (en) * | 2015-02-16 | 2016-08-25 | Göksel Osman Zühtü | A system and a method for exploitation of gas from gas-hydrate formations |
| CN106677745B (en) * | 2016-12-02 | 2018-10-12 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A kind of gas hydrates decompression exploitation and CO2Bury the process of combination |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050121200A1 (en) * | 2003-12-04 | 2005-06-09 | Alwarappa Sivaraman | Process to sequester CO2 in natural gas hydrate fields and simultaneously recover methane |
| US20050120878A1 (en) * | 2003-12-04 | 2005-06-09 | Dennis Leppin | Process for separating carbon dioxide and methane |
| US20060060356A1 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2006-03-23 | Arne Graue | Production of free gas by gas hydrate conversion |
| US20110029273A1 (en) * | 2009-07-10 | 2011-02-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus to monitor reformation and replacement of co2/ch4 gas hydrates |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20040200618A1 (en) * | 2002-12-04 | 2004-10-14 | Piekenbrock Eugene J. | Method of sequestering carbon dioxide while producing natural gas |
-
2011
- 2011-10-20 US US13/277,578 patent/US20120097401A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-10-20 WO PCT/US2011/057072 patent/WO2012061027A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20050121200A1 (en) * | 2003-12-04 | 2005-06-09 | Alwarappa Sivaraman | Process to sequester CO2 in natural gas hydrate fields and simultaneously recover methane |
| US20050120878A1 (en) * | 2003-12-04 | 2005-06-09 | Dennis Leppin | Process for separating carbon dioxide and methane |
| US20060060356A1 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2006-03-23 | Arne Graue | Production of free gas by gas hydrate conversion |
| US20110029273A1 (en) * | 2009-07-10 | 2011-02-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus to monitor reformation and replacement of co2/ch4 gas hydrates |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10968707B2 (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2021-04-06 | Aker Solutions As | Subsea methane hydrate production |
| JP2019520498A (en) * | 2016-07-06 | 2019-07-18 | エイカー ソリューションズ エーエス | Submarine methane production assembly |
| JP7011610B2 (en) | 2016-07-06 | 2022-01-26 | エイカー ソリューションズ エーエス | Submarine methane production assembly |
| US12116869B2 (en) | 2016-07-06 | 2024-10-15 | Aker Solutions As | Subsea methane production assembly |
| US11225858B2 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2022-01-18 | Jgc Corporation | Methane gas production facility and methane gas production method |
| CN113431534A (en) * | 2021-08-09 | 2021-09-24 | 北京科技大学 | Low-permeability compact reservoir CO2Huff and puff well selection method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20120097401A1 (en) | 2012-04-26 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20120097401A1 (en) | Selective hydrate production with co2 and controlled depressurization | |
| RU2370642C2 (en) | Gas recovery by conversion of gas hydrate | |
| Jadhawar et al. | Subsurface carbon dioxide sequestration and storage in methane hydrate reservoirs combined with clean methane energy recovery | |
| Gong et al. | Miscible CO2 simultaneous water-and-gas (CO2-SWAG) injection in the Bakken formation | |
| US20120035405A1 (en) | Method for enhanced gas hydrate permeability | |
| Majidaie et al. | A simulation study of chemically enhanced water alternating gas CWAG injection | |
| US20150090455A1 (en) | Natural Gas Hydrate Reservoir Heating | |
| US9091156B2 (en) | Downhole fluid injection systems, CO2 sequestration methods, and hydrocarbon material recovery methods | |
| Mwakipunda et al. | Critical review on carbon dioxide sequestration potentiality in methane hydrate reservoirs via CO2–CH4 exchange: experiments, simulations, and pilot test applications | |
| Zadeh et al. | Characteristics of formation and dissociation of CO2 hydrates at different CO2-Water ratios in a bulk condition | |
| RU2502863C2 (en) | Method and system for production of hydrocarbons from hydrate formation using blowdown gas | |
| AU2009260314B2 (en) | Producing gaseous hydrocarbons from hydrate capped reservoirs | |
| Anikin et al. | Gas Enhanced Oil Recovery Methods For Offshore Oilfields: Features, Implementation, Operational Status | |
| US10876384B2 (en) | Methods of utilizing carbon monoxide to increase oil recovery and protect tubulars | |
| US12158062B2 (en) | Sweep efficiency of carbon dioxide gas injection | |
| Peat et al. | Laboratory Testing to Assess Suitability of Geological Storage Prospects and the Associated Risks of CO2 Hydrates During CO2Injection (III)–Assessment of Thermal Hydrate Inhibitors | |
| Gupta et al. | Gas hydrates extraction by swapping-depressurisation method | |
| Bogaert et al. | Managing formation-damage risk from scale-inhibitor squeeze treatments in deepwater, subsea fields in the campos basin | |
| US12428941B2 (en) | Closed loop hydrogen production and storage | |
| Mu et al. | Analysis of Global Gas Hydrate Production Test and Development Prospects | |
| Mateen et al. | Journey of Successful Deployment of Kinetic Hydrate Inhibition in a Giant Gas Condensate Field in the Middle East | |
| Mackay et al. | How is Scale Prevention Affected by the Late Field Depressurisation of Waterflooded Reservoirs? | |
| Sun | Modeling of hydrate formation and dissociation in porous media | |
| Atia et al. | State of the art on enhanced oil recovery with CO2 sequestration for low carbon industry | |
| Tchambak | Cold Heavy Oil Production Using CO2-EOR Technique |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 11838455 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 11838455 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |