[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2011026248A2 - Composition détergente désinfectante - Google Patents

Composition détergente désinfectante Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2011026248A2
WO2011026248A2 PCT/CH2010/000199 CH2010000199W WO2011026248A2 WO 2011026248 A2 WO2011026248 A2 WO 2011026248A2 CH 2010000199 W CH2010000199 W CH 2010000199W WO 2011026248 A2 WO2011026248 A2 WO 2011026248A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
composition
mol
silver
amount
nonionic surfactant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/CH2010/000199
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2011026248A3 (fr
Inventor
Janos GÖMÖRI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sanosil AG
Original Assignee
Sanosil AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sanosil AG filed Critical Sanosil AG
Publication of WO2011026248A2 publication Critical patent/WO2011026248A2/fr
Publication of WO2011026248A3 publication Critical patent/WO2011026248A3/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N59/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing elements or inorganic compounds
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N59/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing elements or inorganic compounds
    • A01N59/16—Heavy metals; Compounds thereof

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a composition acting as a detergent, which at the same time has a disinfecting effect.
  • Such compositions may be used as surface cleaning agents for the use in environments where a contamination with germs is to be avoided, e.g. in bathrooms, private or commercial kitchens, industrial production facilities, in particular, in the food and beverage industries, in chemical or biological laboratories, in hospitals etc., for antiseptic handwash applications, for water sanitation, and many other applications.
  • detergent compositions having both a surface-active effect and a germicidal effect are known.
  • Such detergent compositions usually comprise an organic germicide, such as chlorhexidine or a benzalkonium chloride.
  • Benzalkonium chlorides are quaternary ammonium salts acting as cationic surfactants. While being potent bactericides, benzalkonium chlorides are problematic both in terms of human health, being known to be caustic and possibly allergenic, and in view of the environment, being highly toxic to water organisms.
  • Chlorhexidine, a biguanidine acting as a cationic surfactant as well is also problematic both in view of human health and the environment.
  • disinfectants on the basis of hydrogen peroxide and a silver component are incompatible with many known surfactants.
  • the presence of such surfactants may lead to a significantly decreased stability of the hydrogen peroxide, reducing the shelf life significantly and posing hazards due to significant amounts of gaseous oxygen being released from the composition.
  • Many surfactants have a significantly decreased long-term stability themselves in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, being prone to chemical degradation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide.
  • Other surfactants which might be less detrimental to stability of hydrogen peroxide or less affected in their own stability by the presence of hydrogen peroxide, do not exhibit a sufficient cleaning effect.
  • US 6,908,628 discloses several disinfecting and antiseptic compositions comprising, in combination, hydrogen peroxide, a silver halide and lactic acid. Lactic acid appears to be an essential component of these compositions to achieve a sufficiently broad anti-microbial capacity. All these compositions further comprise at least one cationic surfactant, in particular, didecyl-methyl-polyoxy-ethyl-ammonium propionate (examples 2 and 4), chlorhexidine (examples 3 and 7.2), both these compounds (examples 5 and 6), quaternary ammonium chlorides (example 7.2.2), or ammonium propyl amide salts (example 7.2.3). These surfactants may be problematic towards the environment.
  • the document does not address the problem of achieving a sufficient degree of long-term stability of the ready-to-use compositions.
  • the document suggests that, at least for some compositions, the components of the disinfectant should be mixed only at the time of use due to a limited shelf life of the ready-to-use compositions, making it recommendable to eliminate the compositions at the end of the day. This is uneconomical and causes further environmental concerns.
  • DE 10 2007 003 693 discloses a disinfecting composition
  • a disinfecting composition comprising hydrogen peroxide, colloidal silver, a solubilizer, and sodium lauryl ether sulphate as an anionic surfactant. No applications as a detergent are described. Indeed, while the components of this composition may be environmentally acceptable, such a composition will have only a limited range of action as a detergent.
  • a composition according to the present invention comprises (all relative amounts, percentages or concentrations referring to the ready-made composition):
  • hydrogen peroxide in an amount of 1-15%, preferably 2-15%, more preferably 5- 10% by weight, in particular, approximately 7.5% by weight;
  • nonionic surfactant being a C 8 -C] 8 alkyl polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 3-15 mol/mol, the nonionic surfactant being present in an amount above the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of the nonionic surfactant in the composition, preferably at least five times above the CMC; and
  • CMC critical micelle concentration
  • the anionic surfactant being a Ci 2 -Ci 8 secondary alkyl sulphonate in an amount above the critical micelle concentration of the anionic surfactant in the composition, preferably at least five times above the CMC.
  • Such a composition provides effective, fast cleaning and disinfection while being easy and safe to handle. It is mild and kind to the skin, non-toxic, ecologically friendly, and biodegradable.
  • the product has a remarkably long shelf life. It may be supplemented with fragrances if desired.
  • the bactericidal action of the product is much higher than it would be expected from the individual components, proving a synergistic effect between the components.
  • the composition may be directly used as a detergent or may be further diluted with water to obtain a diluted detergent product. Therefore the invention also encompasses a detergent product obtainable by diluting the above-described detergent composition with water to a content of the detergent composition of 0.5-100% by weight.
  • the product comprises at least two surfactants.
  • the first surfactant is at least one nonionic surfactant of the class of the C 8 -Ci 8 alkyl polyglycol ethers, of general formula
  • R is a C 8 -Ci8 linear or branched alkyl residue
  • n is an integer typically between 3 and 15.
  • the integer n is also called the ethylene oxide (EO) content or EO adduct number. It corresponds to the number of moles of ethylene oxide contained in one mole of the surfactant and may therefore be expressed with the unit of mol/mol.
  • the EO content is usually strongly polydisperse, following a broad distribution, and the mean EO content is usually provided to characterize a particular alkyl polyglycol ether. In the U.S. literature, sometimes the EO content is instead given in percent by mass.
  • the EO content in percent by mass, EO% may be calculated from the EO content n in mol/mol by the following formula:
  • MROH is the molar mass of the alcohol ROH.
  • the second surfactant is at least one anionic surfactant of the class of the Ci 2 -Cj 8 secondary alkyl sulphonates, of general formula R-S0 2 -OM, where R is a Ci 2 -Ci 8 , preferably Ci 4 -C 17 secondary alkyl residue and M is a monovalent cation, usually sodium.
  • Alkyl sulphonates are environmentally acceptable anionic surfactants with good solubility in water.
  • the anionic surfactant is a sodium salt of a C] 4 -Ci 7 secondary alkyl sulphonate.
  • Such a surfactant is available commercially, e.g., from Clariant GmbH, Frankfurt a.M., Germany as a 30% solution under the brand name "Hostapur SAS 30"TM. It has been found that the presence of these two particular classes of surfactants results in several remarkable properties of the composition.
  • the composition exhibits an extremely high efficacy both as a detergent and as a disinfectant in a broad spectrum of applications, while at the same time providing a remarkably increased stability of both the hydrogen peroxide and the surfactants themselves in the composition.
  • the combination of these two particular classes of surfactants avoids possible gaps in the cleaning action that might appear in the absence of one of the surfactants, or that might appear if one of the surfactants is replaced by another surfactant.
  • the composition acts against a wide range of germs, including gram positive and gram negative bacteria, viruses, yeast, fungi and algae.
  • the action as a disinfectant is remarkably increased over the action of any of the components alone and over the subcombinations of the components, proving an unexpected synergistic effect between the components in the composition of the invention.
  • the composition exhibits an anti-microbial activity that is remarkably higher than the anti-microbial activity of the composition in absence of the surfactants or of the anti-microbial activity of the surfactants alone.
  • each of the surfactants should be present in an amount above its respective critical micelle concentration (CMC) and preferably in an amount of at least five times the CMC.
  • CMC critical micelle concentration
  • the CMC may be determined by standard methods known in the art, in particular by surface tension measurements, the surface tension being known to substantially decrease with increasing surfactant concentration below the CMC and to remain substantially constant above the CMC. Such measurements may be readily automated, automatic surface tension measurement devices being known in the art. Other known methods for CMC determination are based on dye binding via fluorescence measurements, Stokes shift measurements, interface tension measurements at the interface to hydrophobic fluids, or on density measurements.
  • the CMC in water is roughly in the range of 5-200 ppm.
  • the one or more nonionic surfactant are present in a total amount of at least 1000 ppm (0.1%) by weight, in particular between 0.5% and 10% by weight, preferably between 2% and 8% by weight, in particular approximately 4% by weight.
  • the at least one anionic surfactant is preferably present in an amount of at least 1000 ppm (0.1 %) by weight, in particular between 0.1% and 3% by weight, preferably between 0.1% and 1% by weight, in particular approximately 0.3% by weight.
  • the (total) amount of nonionic surfactants is preferably at least three times, more preferably at least five times, most preferably at least 10 times the (total) amount of anionic surfactants, a too high relative content in anionic surfactants being detrimental to both stability and efficacy.
  • the total content of surfactants in the composition will generally be at least approximately 0.1% by weight, preferably between 0.5% and 15% by weight, more preferred between 2% and 10% by weight.
  • the nonionic surfactant is preferably a Cio-C
  • the range of 10-14 carbon atoms in the alcohol residue is particularly suited to provide a good cleaning action of the surfactant, in particular, in combination with the anionic surfactant.
  • the nonionic surfactant is preferably selected from the group consisting of:
  • Isotridecyl polyglycol ethers are available, e.g., from Clariant under the brand name "Genapol X”TM. They may be obtained with varying mean EO content, at least in the range 2-15 mol/mol. Their properties vary with the degree of ethoxylation.
  • isotridecyl polyglycol ether with an EO content of 5 mol/mol available as “Genapol X 050"TM, has a strong degreasing effect, while isotridecyl polyglycol ether with an EO content of 8 mol/mol, available as "Genapol X 080"TM, has excellent wetting capabilities.
  • Oxo alcohols are primary, partially branched alcohols that may be obtained from an oxo synthesis, by hydrating oxo aldehydes or their primary aldocondensation products catalytically to obtain the corresponding alcohols.
  • Cn-oxo alcohol polyglycol ethers are commercially available, e.g., from Clariant under the brand name "Genapol UD”TM.
  • a Cn-oxo alcohol polyglycol ether with a mean EO content of approximately 1 1 mol/mol is available under the brand name "Genapol UD 1 10"TM.
  • the composition comprises at least a first and a second nonionic surfactant, the first nonionic surfactant being an isotridecyl polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 3-10 mol/mol, and the second nonionic surfactant being a Cn- oxo alcohol polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 10-12 mol/mol, in particular, approximately 1 1 mol/mol.
  • This particular combination if nonionic surfactants remarkably increases the range of action as a detergent without compromising disinfecting action or stability of the hydrogen peroxide.
  • the presence of the Cn-oxo alcohol polyglycol ether having a relatively low number of carbon atoms and a distribution of linear and branched residues while having a relatively high EO content, very efficiently complements the isotridecyl polyglycol ether with its higher number of carbon atoms and its lower EO content.
  • the amount of the first nonionic surfactant is preferably at least three times, more preferred at least five times the content of the second nonionic surfactant.
  • the range of action as a detergent may be further optimized by providing at least a first, a second and a third nonionic surfactant, the first nonionic surfactant being an isotridecyl polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 7-9 mol/mol, in particular, approximately 8 mol/mol, the second nonionic surfactant being an isotridecyl polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 4-6 mol/mol, in particular, approximately 5 mol/mol, and the third nonionic surfactant being a Cn-oxo alcohol polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 10-12 mol/mol, in particular, approximately 11 mol/mol.
  • the first nonionic surfactant being an isotridecyl polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 7-9 mol/mol, in particular, approximately 8 mol/mol
  • the second nonionic surfactant being an isotridecyl polyg
  • the amount of the first nonionic surfactant is preferably at least three times, more preferred at least five times the amount of the second and third nonionic surfactants.
  • the second and third nonionic surfactants are present in approximately equal amounts (relative weight ration of 0.5-2.0, preferably 0.8-1.2).
  • the composition is preferably essentially free of cationic surfactants and/or lactic acid.
  • the term "essentially free of means that the corresponding components are present at most in trace amounts and certainly well below 10 ppm, preferably below 1 ppm.
  • the composition may comprise an organic or inorganic acid, in particular, one or more of phosphoric acid, nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, or boric acid. Phosphoric acid is preferred.
  • the acid is preferably present in an amount sufficient to reduce the pH of the composition to pH 3 or lower, in order to achieve optimum long-term stability of the composition.
  • the composition may in addition comprise a biopolymeric stabilizer like gelatin, gum arabic, guar gum, carrageen or pectin, even though the presence of such a stabilizer is not critical due to the presence of the tensides.
  • a biopolymeric stabilizer like gelatin, gum arabic, guar gum, carrageen or pectin, even though the presence of such a stabilizer is not critical due to the presence of the tensides.
  • Such naturally occurring macromolecular biopolymers are sometimes designated in the literature as "protective colloids” that interact both with the hydrogen peroxide and the colloidal silver particles or silver ions. Gum arabic is preferred.
  • a biopolymeric stabilizer is present, its content is preferably above 1 ppm, in particular 2-100 ppm, preferably 5-30 ppm.
  • the silver component may be a silver salt, in particular, one or more of the silver salts selected from the group consisting of silver nitrate, silver sulphate, silver chloride, sodium/silver chloride complex, silver benzoate, silver carbonate, silver fluoride, silver (I) oxide and silver (II) oxide.
  • silver nitrate is preferred.
  • the total content in silver ions of the composition should be 30-300 ppm by weight.
  • the composition may comprise 5-25%, preferably about 15% of the product obtainable by example III of US 4,915,955, which itself comprises, in an aqueous solution, hydrogen peroxide in an amount of 49% by volume, silver nitrate in an amount corresponding to a silver content of 1000 ppm by weight, gelatin in an amount of approximately 150 ppm by weight, and phosphoric acid to adjust the pH to below approximately pH 2.
  • the silver component may be elemental silver in the form of colloidal silver.
  • the amount of colloidal silver in the composition should be 30-300 ppm by weight.
  • colloidal silver is to be understood in the usual manner in the chemical art. In particular, this term relates to any preparation of elemental silver that is sufficiently finely dispersed to form a colloid solution when dispersed in water.
  • the mean particle size (arithmetic mean over the diameter of fictitious spheres having the same number of silver atoms) is generally in the range below 30 micrometers.
  • colloidal silver may always also contain a certain proportion of ionic silver in addition to elemental silver due to redox reactions on the surface of the silver particles.
  • the numerical value of the content of colloidal silver and/or silver ions expressed in ppm by weight, preferably amounts to about eight to twelve times, most preferred about ten times, the numerical value of the concentration of hydrogen peroxide, expressed in percent by volume.
  • the composition may comprise at least one sodium salt selected from the group consisting of sodium nitrate, sodium sulfate and combinations thereof, in an amount between 5 and 125 ppm by weight, preferably between 20 and 80 ppm by weight. It has been found that long-term stability of the hydrogen peroxide is significantly improved if sodium nitrate and/or sodium sulfate is added to the composition. The mechanism by which these sodium salts act to stabilize the composition remains unknown at present.
  • the sodium salt is sodium nitrate.
  • composition is preferably essentially free of any added synthetic organic complexing agents, in particular, polyhydroxyl carboxylic acids, forming complexes with silver.
  • synthetic organic complexing agents in particular, polyhydroxyl carboxylic acids
  • Such agents were used in the prior art to stabilize colloidal silver solutions, but may be environmentally or pharmacologically problematic.
  • the term "essentially free of synthetic organic complexing agents" is generally to be understood to mean that such agents are present at the most in trace amounts that are too low to bind any significant amount (less than a few percent, in particular, less than 5%, preferably less than 1%) of the silver present in the concentrate.
  • composition may comprise 5-25%, preferably about 15% of a disinfecting concentrate comprising:
  • colloidal silver in an amount of 150-1000 ppm by weight
  • a stabilizer comprising at least one biopolymer, the stabilizer being present in an amount of 10-100 ppm by weight;
  • phosphoric acid in an amount effective to adjust the pH value of the concentrate to less than or equal to 3.0, preferably in a concentration of less than or equal to 500 ppm by weight;
  • the composition may comprise approximately 15% of a concentrate essentially consisting of hydrogen peroxide in a concentration of 49-51% by volume, colloidal silver in an amount of 490-510 ppm by weight, phosphoric acid in an amount of of 400-500 ppm by weight, sodium nitrate in an amount of 250-300 ppm by weight, gum arabic in an amount of 20-25 ppm by weight, and water (preferably deionized, ultrafiltered or treated by reverse osmosis), the water preferably having a conductivity of less than or equal to 0.1 ⁇ 8/ ⁇ (microsiemens per centimeter).
  • a concentrate essentially consisting of hydrogen peroxide in a concentration of 49-51% by volume, colloidal silver in an amount of 490-510 ppm by weight, phosphoric acid in an amount of of 400-500 ppm by weight, sodium nitrate in an amount of 250-300 ppm by weight, gum arabic in an amount of 20-25 ppm by weight, and water (preferably deionized, ultrafiltered or
  • composition may comprise 5-25%, preferably approximately 15% of the concentrate obtainable from Example 1 of PCT/CH 2009/000234 filed July 3, 2009.
  • Fig. 1 shows a diagram illustrating the bactericidal action of the composition according to the present invention and of several controls.
  • Example 1 Preparation of a disinfecting detergent composition containing silver nitrate
  • aqueous disinfectant comprising hydrogen peroxide and silver nitrate was prepared according to Example III of US 4,915,955, whose contents are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference for teaching the preparation of aqueous disinfectants containing hydrogen peroxide and a silver component.
  • This disinfectant is available commercially from Sanosil AG, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland under the brand name "Sanosil Super 25".
  • Hostapur SAS-30TM a 30% solution of anionic surfactant in water
  • the resulting concentrated detergent composition contained:
  • isotridecyl polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 5 mol/mol in an amount of approximately 0.5% by weight;
  • isotridecyl polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 8 mol/mol in an amount of approximately 3% by weight;
  • This concentrated composition is ready to be used in cleaning applications where a strong cleaning effect is required, e.g. for surface cleaning applications with strong dirt layers.
  • the concentrated composition is storage stable, with a decomposition of hydrogen peroxide of less than 5% over two years at ambient temperature (5-25 °C).
  • the concentrated composition may be further diluted.
  • a first diluted composition was obtained by diluting the concentrated composition with deionized water to a concentration of 20% by volume, i.e. to a hydrogen peroxide content of approximately 1.5% by volume, a silver ion content of approximately 30 ppm, and a total surfactant content of approximately 0.9% by weight. This diluted product will in the following be referred to as sample D.
  • a second diluted composition was obtained by diluting the concentrated composition with deionized water to a concentration of 1% by volume.
  • Example 2 Preparation of a disinfecting detergent composition containing colloidal silver
  • a concentrate for an aqueous disinfectant was prepared according to Example 1 of PCT/CH 2009/000234 filed July 3, 2009, whose contents are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference for teaching the preparation of aqueous disinfectants containing hydrogen peroxide and colloidal silver.
  • a stabilizer for preparing the concentrate, 50 grams of a stabilizer (gum arabic "quick-gum type 8074", purified and standardized, E414 / CAS 9000-01-05; Alfred L.
  • the concentrate essentially consisted of:
  • colloidal silver in an amount of approximately 500 ppm by weight
  • gum arabic in an amount of approximately 21 ppm by weight
  • the resulting concentrated detergent composition contained:
  • colloidal silver in an amount of approximately 75 ppm by weight; gum arabic in an amount of approximately 3 ppm by weight;
  • isotridecyl polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 5 mol/mol in an amount of approximately 0.5% by weight;
  • isotridecyl polyglycol ether with a mean ethylene oxide content of 8 mol/mol in an amount of approximately 3% by weight;
  • the total content in surfactants was approximately 4.3% by weight. Also this concentrated composition is ready to be used in cleaning applications where a strong cleaning effect is required.
  • the concentrated composition is storage stable at least over a time of two years at ambient temperature with less than 5% decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (see Example 6 below).
  • a diluted product was obtained by diluting the concentrated composition with water to a concentration of 20% by volume, i.e. to a hydrogen peroxide content of approximately 1.5% by volume, a silver content of approximately 15 ppm by weight, and a total surfactant content of approximately 0.9% by weight.
  • Example 4A Bactericidal tests at 20% concentration The bactericidal properties of the first diluted product of Example 1 (sample D) were tested as follows. 10 ml of sample D were contaminated with E. coli (ATTC 8739) at an initial germ count of 9.27 x 10 6 /ml. The mixture was kept at 37 °C for 30 minutes. The germ count was determined after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 30 minutes. Controls were carried out in the same manner. Controls are given in Table 1 (samples A-C and E-F).
  • Table 1 Samples for tests of bactericidal activity
  • sample A i.e. of the combination of hydrogen peroxide with surfactants
  • the behavior of sample A may therefore be understood as an additive superposition of the actions of hydrogen peroxide (sample A) and of the surfactants (sample E).
  • the initial rapid decrease in germ count may be attributed to the surfactants, while the slower decrease thereafter may be attributed to the hydrogen peroxide.
  • Example 4B Bactericidal tests at 1% concentration
  • Bactericidal efficiency was tested by quantitative methods proposed by Deutsche Deutschen fur Hygiene und Mikrobiologie (DGHM) according to their guidelines for testing chemical methods of disinfection. Bactericidal efficiency was indicated by the RF value, which represents the order of magnitude by which the agent is able to reduce the number of germs in a microbe suspension under the conditions tested. An RF value of 5 is considered acceptable by DGHM.
  • DGHM Deutsche Deutschen Deutschen fur Hygiene und Mikrobiologie
  • An inactivating mixture "In-Fo” was prepared as follows: 0.85% NaCl; 0.1% tripcasine; 3.0% polysorbate-80; 0.3% lecitihin; 0.1% histidine; 0.5% Na-thiosulphate in water.
  • Organic matter load was modeled with high-fat milk having 6% to 20% milk fat concentration.
  • the number of cells was determined by spreading on agar plates and by counting the cells still alive by colony forming.
  • Suspensions of microbe cultures were prepared according to DGHM specifications. Concentrations were set in sterile water at standard hardness. 0.1 ml of microbe suspension were added to 10 ml of test solution and stirred. At specified temperatures and exposure times, a volume of 1 ml was removed from each sample and pipetted into the 9 ml of inactivating mixture In-Fo. After 10 minutes, dilution series were formed from the mixtures, and the number of cells that had survived were determined. For verification, sterile hard water was used instead of disinfectant. The tests were carried out at ambient temperature.
  • HNCMB Hungarian national collection of medical bacteria
  • Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) HNCMB 1 10003
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa HNCMB 170001
  • Streptococcus faecium S. faecium HNCMB 80177
  • Candida albicans (C. albicans) OKI Mycological Dept.
  • Tests were carried out at ambient temperature at an exposure time of 30 minutes, at medium protein load, using the second diluted product of Example 1 (1% by volume of the concentrated detergent composition diluted in water, corresponding to a hydrogen peroxide content of approximately 0.075% by volume).
  • Fungicidal activity was additionally tested with the first diluted product of Example 1 (20% by volume of the concentrated detergent composition diluted in water) at high protein load. Fungicidal activity proved to be excellent (RF > 5) under these conditions.
  • Example 5 Cleaning action
  • the cleaning action of the concentrated composition and of the 20% diluted product of Examples 1 and 2 was tested on various surfaces, including glass, steel, ceramics, chromium-nickel steel, plastics and wood, against a variety of contaminants, including natural fats, glycerin, petroleum jelly (Vaseline), tallow, inorganic and organic lubricants, blood, synthetic fats, paraffin and fatty acids.
  • the concentrated compositions as well as the diluted products exhibited excellent cleaning properties on all surfaces over the full spectrum of contaminants, without any negative effects on the surfaces.
  • Example 6 Stability tests
  • Example 2 Both the concentrated detergent composition of Example 2 (initial hydrogen peroxide content 7.5% by volume) and the diluted composition of Example 2 (20% by volume of concentrated detergent composition in deionized water at a conductivity below 0.1 ⁇ 8/ ⁇ , initial hydrogen peroxide content 1.5% by volume) were subjected to long-time stability tests over a period of 24 months, in three different temperature ranges. Two batches of each the concentrated composition and the 20% diluted composition were tested. Results are given in Tables 2 (concentrated composition) and Table 3 (20% diluted composition). Table 2: Long-time stability tests, concentrate - hydrogen peroxide content in percent by volume
  • the concentrated product exhibited a hydrogen peroxide decomposition of less than 2% after 12 months and less than 5% after 24 months at temperatures between 5 and 25 °C.
  • the 20% diluted product lost 7% of its hydrogen peroxide content after 12 months and 20% of the hydrogen peroxide content after 24 months at temperatures between 5 and 25 °C.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne une composition agissant à la fois comme un détergent et comme un désinfectant. Cette composition contient du peroxyde d'hydrogène, un constituant argent, un polyglycol-éther d'alkyle C8-C18 présentant une teneur moyenne en oxyde d'éthylène comprise entre 3 et 15 mol/mol, et un sulfonate d'alkyle secondaire C12-C18. Une telle composition permet une désinfection et un nettoyage efficaces et rapides, et peut être manipulée de manière simple et en toute sécurité. Cette composition n'est pas forte, n'abîme pas la peau et n'est pas toxique. Elle est écologique et biodégradable, et a une durée de vie de stockage remarquablement longue.
PCT/CH2010/000199 2009-09-04 2010-08-17 Composition détergente désinfectante Ceased WO2011026248A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH13682009 2009-09-04
CH1368/09 2009-09-04

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2011026248A2 true WO2011026248A2 (fr) 2011-03-10
WO2011026248A3 WO2011026248A3 (fr) 2011-10-13

Family

ID=41514968

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CH2010/000199 Ceased WO2011026248A2 (fr) 2009-09-04 2010-08-17 Composition détergente désinfectante

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2011026248A2 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015136475A1 (fr) * 2014-03-13 2015-09-17 Szymanski Zygmunt Nanopréparation bactéricide

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4915955A (en) 1986-04-22 1990-04-10 Sanosil Ag. Process for preparing a disinfectant
US6908628B2 (en) 2001-06-15 2005-06-21 Oftrai, S.L. Disinfectant and antiseptic composition
DE102007003693A1 (de) 2007-01-25 2008-07-31 Landmann, Johann Desinfektionsmittel

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10105345A1 (de) * 2000-07-14 2002-01-24 Arconia Gmbh Chur Tierhaarprodukt und Verfahren zur Bearbeitung, insbesondere Reinigung von Tierhaarprodukten
US20030235623A1 (en) * 2002-06-21 2003-12-25 Van Oosterom Piet J.A. Aqueous disinfecting compositions with rapid bactericidal effect
US20090074881A1 (en) * 2006-05-02 2009-03-19 Bioneutral Laboratories Corporation Usa Antimicrobial cidality formulations with residual efficacy, uses thereof, and the preparation thereof

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4915955A (en) 1986-04-22 1990-04-10 Sanosil Ag. Process for preparing a disinfectant
US6908628B2 (en) 2001-06-15 2005-06-21 Oftrai, S.L. Disinfectant and antiseptic composition
DE102007003693A1 (de) 2007-01-25 2008-07-31 Landmann, Johann Desinfektionsmittel

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015136475A1 (fr) * 2014-03-13 2015-09-17 Szymanski Zygmunt Nanopréparation bactéricide

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2011026248A3 (fr) 2011-10-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DK2023733T3 (en) Low foaming enhanced biocidal hydrogen peroxide composition
US8940792B2 (en) Antimicrobial composition and methods for using same
CN103266029B (zh) 活性增强的杀生物过氧化氢组合物
CN1237203A (zh) 含水消毒洗涤组合物
EP0844827B1 (fr) Compositions desinfectantes synergiques tuberculocides et procedes de desinfection
CA2144533A1 (fr) Composition antimicrobienne et methode de preparation
RU2145238C1 (ru) Средство дезинфицирующее
EP1468700A1 (fr) Utilisation de 1-(2-Ethylhexyl)-Glycerine pour la désinfection des surfaces au-dessus de la température ambiante
SI9520017A (en) Microbicidal preparation with low toxicity level, containimng a quaternary ammonia
CA2375936C (fr) Desinfectants a base de n1n-bis(3-aminopropyl) octylamine
TWI292699B (en) Biocidal protection system
JP2017522378A (ja) 銀イオンと四級塩とを含む殺菌組成物
CN110024809A (zh) 储存稳定的消毒剂浓缩物及其应用
US20240041037A1 (en) Disinfectant and use thereof
CA1317542C (fr) Composition sterilisante a base de glutaraldehyde presentant une activite antibacterienne et antimycotique, dans un vehicule aqueux
WO2020167933A1 (fr) Compositions désinfectantes de peroxyde d'hydrogène sans alcool et leurs procédés d'utilisation
WO2011026248A2 (fr) Composition détergente désinfectante
CN103491780B (zh) 杀菌组合物和杀菌洗涤剂组合物
RU2194072C2 (ru) Средство дезинфицирующе-моющее
KR920004180B1 (ko) 살균제 조성물
EP0799570A1 (fr) Préparation et utilisation de formulations microbicides
RU2230574C1 (ru) Средство дезинфицирующее
US5250573A (en) Glutaraldehyde-based sterilising composition of antibacterial and antimycotic activity, in an aqueous vehicle
US20070286907A1 (en) Germicide composition
CN103491779A (zh) 杀菌组合物和杀菌洗涤剂组合物

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10745128

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10745128

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2