[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2011054035A1 - Pente perfectionnée d'une mine à ciel ouvert - Google Patents

Pente perfectionnée d'une mine à ciel ouvert Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2011054035A1
WO2011054035A1 PCT/AU2010/001459 AU2010001459W WO2011054035A1 WO 2011054035 A1 WO2011054035 A1 WO 2011054035A1 AU 2010001459 W AU2010001459 W AU 2010001459W WO 2011054035 A1 WO2011054035 A1 WO 2011054035A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
borehole
reinforcing member
batter
crest
face
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/AU2010/001459
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Andrew Haile
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BHP SSM Indonesia Holdings Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
BHP Billiton SSM Development Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2009905382A external-priority patent/AU2009905382A0/en
Application filed by BHP Billiton SSM Development Pty Ltd filed Critical BHP Billiton SSM Development Pty Ltd
Priority to AU2010314803A priority Critical patent/AU2010314803A1/en
Priority to CA2779674A priority patent/CA2779674A1/fr
Priority to US13/505,647 priority patent/US20120230776A1/en
Priority to CN2010800500411A priority patent/CN102597379A/zh
Priority to EP10827708A priority patent/EP2496773A1/fr
Priority to RU2012122782/03A priority patent/RU2012122782A/ru
Priority to JP2012537263A priority patent/JP2013509517A/ja
Publication of WO2011054035A1 publication Critical patent/WO2011054035A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D17/00—Excavations; Bordering of excavations; Making embankments
    • E02D17/18—Making embankments, e.g. dikes, dams
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D17/00—Excavations; Bordering of excavations; Making embankments
    • E02D17/20—Securing of slopes or inclines
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21C—MINING OR QUARRYING
    • E21C41/00—Methods of underground or surface mining; Layouts therefor
    • E21C41/26—Methods of surface mining; Layouts therefor

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an improved slope of an open cut mine and a method of forming a reinforced rock slope in an open cut mine.
  • the invention has been developed for an application in an open cut mine and it will be convenient to hereinafter describe the invention with reference to this particular application. It should be appreciated that the invention may have other applications in an open excavation environment, such as a quarry, and the invention is not to be limited to use only in a mine.
  • Mining companies use various methods of extracting ore from the ground, and an open cut mine is one method that requires the removal of a substantial volume of material.
  • the excavation of the material develops a pit with a floor and a slope extending up from the floor.
  • the slope is formed by a series of batters, with berms spacing the batters and providing rockfall catchment or a ramp for mining traffic accessing the pit floor. It is generally desirable to maximise the angle of the slope as it has the potential to minimise the extraction of waste material and maximise the extraction of ore.
  • a batter is generally excavated to an angle that, having regard to the characteristics of the rock, is naturally stable. This is generally no greater than 70° and normally more in the range of 50° to 70°. Where the berm at the top of the batter is acting as a ramp, or accommodating other critical mine infrastructure such as vent stacks or pumping stations, it is desirable to decrease the angle to account for the additional load and risk.
  • any angle other than 90° will typically result in inefficiencies.
  • a batter of less than 90° will result in ore being left behind to maintain the berm above.
  • a batter of less than 90° may result in waste material being unnecessarily removed, particularly when it is outside the area of the ore deposit.
  • open cut mines still tend to have batter faces at angles less than 70° to ensure natural stability.
  • a safety issue with open cut mines relates to rocks falling from the face of the batter onto traffic or personal on the berm below.
  • an improved slope of an open cut mine including a plurality batters with a berm extending from a toe of each batter, each batter having an excavated batter face which is substantially vertical and extends from the toe to a crest of the batter, reinforcing means installed prior to the excavation of the face and spaced from the proposed crest, the reinforcing means including a plurality of reinforcing members each located in a substantially vertical borehole formed at said spacing from the proposed crest, each borehole extends to a depth of at least the distance between the crest and the toe, each reinforcing member extends substantially the depth of the each borehole
  • each borehole exceeds the distance between the crest and the toe by up to 15%. It is further preferred that each borehole is spaced from an adjacent borehole by between 1000mm and 5000mm. It is still further preferred that each reinforcing member is a bar or cable of a diameter of between 20mm and 100mm. It is preferred that the bar or cable is formed from steel, or alternatively each reinforcing member is formed from fibreglass. It is preferred that the reinforcing member is grouted in position in the borehole. It is preferred that the length of the reinforcing member exceeds the depth of the borehole, and in particular the reinforcing member extends out from the borehole to interact with a safety fence extending between the plurality of boreholes.
  • the length of the reinforcing member is less than the length of the borehole so that the reinforcing member is countersunk in the borehole. It is preferred that the substantially vertical face is within the range of 75° to 90°. It is further preferred that each borehole is spaced from the crest by no less than 800mm.
  • a method of forming a reinforced rock slope in an open cut mine including drilling a plurality of vertical boreholes to a borehole depth, locating a reinforcing member in each borehole which is substantially the length of the borehole depth, grouting the reinforcing bar in the hole, locating a crest of a batter which is spaced from the boreholes, excavating a face to the batter which is substantially parallel with the boreholes, the height of the batter face from the crest to a toe is no less than the depth of the borehole adjacent the face, wherein the excavation of the face is performed after the reinforcing member has been grouted in place in the borehole.
  • each borehole it is no greater than 300 mm in diameter. It is further preferred to space the crest of the batter from each borehole so that the reinforcing member is behind the crest of the batter by no less than 800mm.lt is still further preferred to space each borehole from its adjacent borehole at no less than 1000mm centres. It is still further preferred to provide a reinforcing member in the form of a reinforcing bar is no less than 40mm in diameter. It is still further preferred to drill the borehole depth to exceed the height of the face of the batter by at least 15%. It is still further preferred to provide a length of the reinforcing member that is less than the length of the borehole so that the reinforcing member is countersunk in the borehole.
  • the method of excavating the face includes drilling and blasting to produce the substantially vertical face within a range of 75° to 90°.
  • Figure 1 is a side cross-sectional view of a schematic illustration of an improved slope according to the invention.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a schematic view of an unimproved slope prior to excavation of the batters.
  • Figure 3 illustrates an improved slope with the batter excavated.
  • FIG. 1 that illustrates a natural surface level 1 having been excavated to produce an improved slope 2 of an open cut pit.
  • the improved slope 2 includes a plurality of horizontal berms 3, each spaced by a vertical batter 4.
  • Each batter has a face 5 which extends from a toe 6 of the batter to a crest 7.
  • the slope extends from the natural surface level 1 to the floor 8 of the pit.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a portion of the open cut mine prior to excavation.
  • a crest 7 of the proposed batter 4 is selected, and a series of boreholes 9 spaced from that crest 7 are drilled to a borehole depth.
  • This spacing is preferably no less than 800 mm, however this spacing x is merely preferred. Spacings x of other distances are clearly possible, however it is generally desirable that the spacing x be selected to be sufficient so as to reduce the likelihood that the borehole 9 will be exposed when the batter is excavated.
  • the face 5 of the batter is exposed by a technique of drill and blasting which can cause the crest 7 to crumble. Accordingly it is preferable that the borehole 9 be spaced from the crest by 1500mm to avoid the hole being exposed when blasting.
  • each borehole 9 have a diameter of no greater than 300 mm, however this dimension is merely preferred.
  • the function of the borehole 9 is to accommodate a reinforcing member 10 and therefore the diameter of the borehole 9 is dictated to some extent by the characteristics of the reinforcing member 10.
  • the reinforcing member 10 be grouted in position in the borehole 9, and therefore the diameter of the borehole will need to be selected to satisfy minimum cover requirements, particularly where the reinforcing member 10 is a steel bar. Accordingly, it is to be appreciated that the diameter of the borehole 9 may vary, however it is generally preferred that the diameter be less than 300 mm.
  • Each borehole 9 is preferably drilled behind the crest at a spacing y to space it from an adjacent borehole preferably by no less than 2000 mm, where the berm is not supporting critical mine infrastructure. Where the berm is acting as a ramp, or supporting critical mine infrastructure such as pumping stations or ventilation shafts, the spacing of the boreholes may need to be less than 2000mm. It is more likely that each borehole be spaced y from an adjacent borehole by between 2,000 and 5,000 mm. This spacing y will specifically be dependent on the characteristics of the rock structure being reinforced by the reinforcing member 10 and the desired level of reliability in the slope stability.
  • the rock structure comprises many closely spaced planes of weakness such as a fault, joints or fracture, it may be appropriate to have the spacings y of each adjacent borehole relatively close. In contrast, if the rock structure comprises very few planes of weakness it may be appropriate to have the spacings y relatively further apart. In either case, the spacings y can be set having regard to information revealed in a geological survey and variable between adjacent boreholes 9.
  • the reinforcing member 10 located in each borehole 9 may take any appropriate form.
  • the preferred form of reinforcing member is a bar or cable formed from steel, however as an alternative it may be formed as a fibreglass rod.
  • the reinforcing member 10 is a bar of steel, it is preferred that the diameter of the bar be between 20 mm and 100 mm. The diameter of the bar will be selected according to the characteristics of the rock, depth of borehole and/or the desired level of reliability in slope stability. The bar is placed in situ and grouted in position.
  • each reinforcing member 10 does not exceed the depth of the borehole 9. It is generally desirable that the reinforcing member 10 and grout are countersunk so as to reduce the likelihood that the top of the reinforcing member 10 is exposed. The top of the reinforcing member 10 might be exposed if the crest 7 crumbles, say as a result of blasting the batter face 5. Accordingly countersinking to a depth of 1000mm or greater is desirable. It may however be appropriate in certain applications that the reinforcing member 10 does exceed the depth of the borehole 9 as this enables the reinforcing member 10 to project from the borehole 9.
  • the projecting reinforcing member 10 may be used for any suitable purpose, however it is preferred that it interacts with a safety fence 1 1 extending between the plurality of adjacent boreholes 9. This alternate embodiment is illustrated in figures 2 and 3.
  • the material 12 beyond the crest 7 that is to be excavated can be excavated by any suitable means.
  • the preferred means illustrated in Figure 2 involves drilling a plurality of additional boreholes 13 at the crest 7 of the batter 4, and beyond the crest 7. Charges can then be placed in the boreholes 13 and the material be moved using drill and blast techniques understood and known by those people operating in this industry.
  • the batter face 5 is substantially vertical, and it is generally preferred that the substantially vertical face 5 be within the range of 75° - 90°.
  • the boreholes 9 including the reinforcing member 10 according to the invention extends to a depth at least equal to a distance between the crest 7 and toe 6 of the batter face 5. It can be seen from Figure 3 that it is preferred that the borehole depth extend beyond the toe, and it is particularly preferred that it extend beyond the toe by up to 15%. It has been found that by extending the reinforced borehole 9 by this distance reduces the likelihood of shear failure of the batter at the toe of the batter.
  • an improved slope 2 as hereinbefore described reduces the inefficiencies associated with a slope having a batter angle of less than 70°. Furthermore, it will reduce the distance from the toe within which rock fall occurs, providing a safer working environment. Still furthermore, reinforcing the batter 4 before excavating the batter face 5 is considered to be a relatively safe operation.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • Pit Excavations, Shoring, Fill Or Stabilisation Of Slopes (AREA)
  • Drilling And Exploitation, And Mining Machines And Methods (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne des mines à ciel ouvert et en particulier une pente perfectionnée d'une mine à ciel ouvert. La pente comprend une face de fruit sensiblement verticale (5) avec une pluralité d'élément de renfort (10) espacés d'une crête (7) de la face de fruit (5).
PCT/AU2010/001459 2009-11-04 2010-11-04 Pente perfectionnée d'une mine à ciel ouvert Ceased WO2011054035A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2010314803A AU2010314803A1 (en) 2009-11-04 2010-11-04 Improved slope of an open cut mine
CA2779674A CA2779674A1 (fr) 2009-11-04 2010-11-04 Pente perfectionnee d'une mine a ciel ouvert
US13/505,647 US20120230776A1 (en) 2009-11-04 2010-11-04 Slope of an Open Cut Mine
CN2010800500411A CN102597379A (zh) 2009-11-04 2010-11-04 露天开采矿的改进型边坡
EP10827708A EP2496773A1 (fr) 2009-11-04 2010-11-04 Pente perfectionnee d'une mine a ciel ouvert
RU2012122782/03A RU2012122782A (ru) 2009-11-04 2010-11-04 Усиленный склон открытого рудника
JP2012537263A JP2013509517A (ja) 2009-11-04 2010-11-04 露天掘りの改良された斜坑

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2009905382 2009-11-04
AU2009905382A AU2009905382A0 (en) 2009-11-04 Improved Slope Of An Open Cut Mine

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2011054035A1 true WO2011054035A1 (fr) 2011-05-12

Family

ID=43969471

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU2010/001459 Ceased WO2011054035A1 (fr) 2009-11-04 2010-11-04 Pente perfectionnée d'une mine à ciel ouvert

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US20120230776A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2496773A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2013509517A (fr)
KR (1) KR20120091288A (fr)
CN (1) CN102597379A (fr)
AU (1) AU2010314803A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2779674A1 (fr)
RU (1) RU2012122782A (fr)
WO (1) WO2011054035A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103133003B (zh) * 2013-02-25 2015-10-21 中国矿业大学 露天矿端帮靠帮开采方法
CN110924398B (zh) * 2019-10-28 2021-07-23 中交第二航务工程局有限公司 一种保通条件下高强岩质边坡拓宽开挖施工方法
CN113550334A (zh) * 2021-06-30 2021-10-26 中冶成都勘察研究总院有限公司 一种矿山边坡稳定梯级台阶布置方法

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU1265331A1 (ru) * 1985-04-23 1986-10-23 Свердловский горный институт им.В.В.Вахрушева Транспортный уступ карьера
US6520591B1 (en) * 1998-05-12 2003-02-18 Ruslan Borisovich Jun R.B. Jun's method of openwork mining utilizing pit wall consolidation
RU2294434C1 (ru) * 2005-09-27 2007-02-27 Акционерная компания "АЛРОСА" (Закрытое акционерное общество) Способ открытой разработки крутопадающих месторождений

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU735775A1 (ru) * 1973-02-12 1980-05-25 Всесоюзный научно-исследовательский институт горной геомеханики и маркшейдерского дела Способ укреплени уступов
US4466669A (en) * 1981-12-18 1984-08-21 Gordon Sellers Method of open cut mining
JPH0874260A (ja) * 1994-09-05 1996-03-19 Fujita Corp もたれ式擁壁による切土斜面補強法
CN1052525C (zh) * 1997-10-23 2000-05-17 北京矿冶研究总院 一种露天高台阶采矿方法
US6299386B1 (en) * 1999-06-09 2001-10-09 R. John Byrne Method and apparatus for a shoring wall
US6800164B2 (en) * 2000-04-06 2004-10-05 Randel Brandstrom Method of making a fiber reinforced rod
ITMI20032154A1 (it) * 2003-11-07 2005-05-08 Uretek Srl Procedimento per incrementare la resistenza di un volume
CN1217068C (zh) * 2004-02-20 2005-08-31 中国科学院力学研究所 一种边坡加固排桩设计方法
US8424852B2 (en) * 2009-01-28 2013-04-23 Benjamin Anson Kit for a barrier system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU1265331A1 (ru) * 1985-04-23 1986-10-23 Свердловский горный институт им.В.В.Вахрушева Транспортный уступ карьера
US6520591B1 (en) * 1998-05-12 2003-02-18 Ruslan Borisovich Jun R.B. Jun's method of openwork mining utilizing pit wall consolidation
RU2294434C1 (ru) * 2005-09-27 2007-02-27 Акционерная компания "АЛРОСА" (Закрытое акционерное общество) Способ открытой разработки крутопадающих месторождений

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20120091288A (ko) 2012-08-17
RU2012122782A (ru) 2013-12-10
CA2779674A1 (fr) 2011-05-12
JP2013509517A (ja) 2013-03-14
US20120230776A1 (en) 2012-09-13
CN102597379A (zh) 2012-07-18
AU2010314803A1 (en) 2012-05-31
EP2496773A1 (fr) 2012-09-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104790956B (zh) 遥控掘进机巷道式开采端帮煤工艺
WO2011103620A1 (fr) Procédé de réduction d'affaissement de surface ou d'impacts de souffle dans une exploitation minière par longue taille
Singh et al. Coal pillar extraction at deep cover: with special reference to Indian coalfields
US20120230776A1 (en) Slope of an Open Cut Mine
WO2013163773A1 (fr) Foliation hydraulique de corps minéralisés exploités au moyen du procédé de foudroyage par blocs ou par panneaux
CA2295230C (fr) Procede d'exploitation combinee de gisements
Okubo et al. Underground mining methods and equipment
Yamatomi et al. Surface mining methods and equipment
Sainsbury Pillar Recovery Adjacent to Stabilized Rockfill at the Ballarat Gold Project
Cavalcante et al. Paste fill–a safety solution for pillar mining
Rutty et al. The evolution of pre-driven recovery roadways at crinum mine
Judeel et al. Extension of the Cullinan Diamond Mine No. 1 Shaft underneath the existing operating shaft, with emphasis on rock engineering considerations
Gonsalves Back Analysis of Previously Stooped Panels to Improve the Safety and Productivity of Future Stooping Operations at New Denmark Colliery
Bridges An extensional mechanism of instability and failure in the walls of open pit mines
Karmis et al. A methodology to assess the potential impacts of longwall mining on streams in the Appalachian Basin
Srikant et al. Geotechnical characterization and design for the transition from the Grasberg open pit to the Grasberg block cave mine
Bartlett Planning mechanised cave with coarse fragmentation in kimberlite
Ram et al. Deployment of Continuous Miner-Based Mass Production Technology from Shallow to Deeper Depths: Challenges and Mitigation Strategies
Adams et al. On the merits of modified sublevel caving mining method–a case study
WO2024250062A1 (fr) Exploitation minière à paroi de fosse raide
Van Khau Determination of parameters of the underground inclined coal seam mining in Quang Ninh basin under protected objects on the surface
Ombiro Selection of the most appropriate underground mining method for Sareke copper mine
Galvin Operational hazards
Hudeček et al. Possibilities of exploitation of graphite deposit in the Czech republic.
Sasaoka et al. Numerical study on effect of rock mass stability on deep deposit slicing at uranium mine in Czech Republic

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 201080050041.1

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10827708

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2779674

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2012537263

Country of ref document: JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2010314803

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 13505647

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2010827708

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2010314803

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20101104

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20127014476

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2012122782

Country of ref document: RU