[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2010019633A1 - Dispositif et procédé pour éliminer des matières solides d'une solution - Google Patents

Dispositif et procédé pour éliminer des matières solides d'une solution Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010019633A1
WO2010019633A1 PCT/US2009/053499 US2009053499W WO2010019633A1 WO 2010019633 A1 WO2010019633 A1 WO 2010019633A1 US 2009053499 W US2009053499 W US 2009053499W WO 2010019633 A1 WO2010019633 A1 WO 2010019633A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
solution
solids
reagent
container
treated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2009/053499
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Edward E. Jackson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of WO2010019633A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010019633A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/72—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C05—FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
    • C05F—ORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C, e.g. FERTILISERS FROM WASTE OR REFUSE
    • C05F3/00—Fertilisers from human or animal excrements, e.g. manure
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/72—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation
    • C02F1/722—Oxidation by peroxides
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/72—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation
    • C02F1/727—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation using pure oxygen or oxygen rich gas
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/72—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation
    • C02F1/76—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation with halogens or compounds of halogens
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/72—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation
    • C02F1/78—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by oxidation with ozone
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F11/00—Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor
    • C02F11/06—Treatment of sludge; Devices therefor by oxidation
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
    • C02F2103/003—Wastewater from hospitals, laboratories and the like, heavily contaminated by pathogenic microorganisms
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
    • C02F2103/005—Black water originating from toilets
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
    • C02F2103/32—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from the food or foodstuff industry, e.g. brewery waste waters
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
    • C02F2103/34—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from industrial activities not provided for in groups C02F2103/12 - C02F2103/32
    • C02F2103/36—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from industrial activities not provided for in groups C02F2103/12 - C02F2103/32 from the manufacture of organic compounds
    • C02F2103/365—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from industrial activities not provided for in groups C02F2103/12 - C02F2103/32 from the manufacture of organic compounds from petrochemical industry (e.g. refineries)
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2301/00—General aspects of water treatment
    • C02F2301/02—Fluid flow conditions
    • C02F2301/024—Turbulent
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2301/00—General aspects of water treatment
    • C02F2301/02—Fluid flow conditions
    • C02F2301/026—Spiral, helicoidal, radial
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A40/00—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
    • Y02A40/10—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in agriculture
    • Y02A40/20—Fertilizers of biological origin, e.g. guano or fertilizers made from animal corpses
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P20/00—Technologies relating to chemical industry
    • Y02P20/141—Feedstock
    • Y02P20/145—Feedstock the feedstock being materials of biological origin

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to changing the concentration of solids in solutions and, more particularly, to reducing the concentration of solids in solutions exemplified by industrial, municipal, medical and agricultural wastes by a process that comprises the addition of an oxidizer and kinetic energy to the solution.
  • the typical cost of sludge management is 30 to 60% of the operating cost of a municipal wastewater treatment system.
  • the residual sludge product even after this expensive processing, must be disposed of in a landfill or land applied.
  • Sludge that is produced in a typical municipal wastewater treatment plant can be handled in various ways within the plant to minimize the cost of ultimate sludge disposal. For example, it can be pumped as an aqueous slurry to a drying bed or to a belt press for liquid reduction or dewatering. In a drying bed, water in the sludge separates and drains back into the plant, usually through sand filters in the floor of the drying bed. On a belt press water is squeezed from sludge by applying pressure. The efficiency of either process can be negatively affected by sludge that is difficult to dewater. For example, characteristics like small particles or colloidal suspensions clog filters in drying beds or clog belt press filter media. There is a need for a treated sludge that dewaters rapidly and does not clog filter media.
  • Non ⁇ miting examples of industries that produce such problematic wastes are the food industry and the petroleum industry, both of which produce waste that requires treatment.
  • Some municipalities prohibit the discharging of industrial wastewater into local sewage systems unless the material has been pre -treated. This is often a major expense for industry, and many industries have been unable to consistently meet municipal or state pretreatment requirements , resulting in fines and negatively impacting public image.
  • Improperly pretreated industrial wastewaters cause operational problems at municipal wastewater treatment facilities, including plant upsets, permit problems, and additional expense.
  • the problem of effective on-site treatment of industrial waste could be solved by an effective, inexpensive and relatively small device that brings industrial waste within municipal sewage guidelines.
  • New regulations discouraging or banning CSO's have caused many municipalities to undertake financially burdensome upgrading of waste treatment systems, sometimes including massive retention facilities to hold untreated wastewater from storm sewers until it can be treated. There is a need for a much less expensive system for avoiding CSO's and for quickly treating storm sewer surges.
  • the military and civilian need for a portable means to treat water of unknown or damaged quality is significant.
  • Significant military logistics problems will be solved by providing a relatively small device that can remove organic pathogens from water available in rivers, lakes and wells or from compromised water systems in a relatively short period of time.
  • a device capable of converting sewage to potable water also would be useful on ships and submarines and in other situations where both space and potable water are scarce, such as in spacecraft.
  • treatment systems that are sufficiently small and compact to be transported to locations where they are needed.
  • the '420 patent does not show or suggest the use of vortices having colliding margins and discloses as a preferred embodiment a structure in which such vortices could not occur.
  • the structural arrangement of the device shown in the '420 patent although somewhat useful, tended to result in a single standing wall vortex extending in toilet bowl fashion upward from the centrally located drain. The standing wall vortex acted as a centrifuge. Suspended solids were not maintained in solution but were separated by centrifugal forces to the sides of the tank where they fell to the bottom and accumulated without being treated. Reduction of CBOD (Carbonaceous Biological Oxygen Demand) levels in the treated wastewater was not satisfactorily quick or complete. Discoveries made while attempting to overcome these disadvantages of the device described in the '420 patent led to the present invention.
  • CBOD Carbonaceous Biological Oxygen Demand
  • a device comprising a substantially closed container suitable for holding a quantity of solution to be treated, at least one kinetic energy subsystem associated with the container for adding an effective level of kinetic energy to the solution and at least one reagent subsystem associated with the at least one kinetic energy subsystem or associated with the container or associated with them both for adding reagent to the solution.
  • Wastewater is broadly used herein to describe a pumpable liquid solvent containing suspended or dissolved solids.
  • the solvent includes water in amounts sufficient that the solution can be described as an aqueous solvent.
  • the solids carried by the solution may be any materials that are capable of being dissolved or suspended in the solution. As described more specifically in the Examples, below, the solids are usually organic in nature. Normally it will be an objective to change the concentration of solids in the solution by reducing or eliminating them.
  • a solution is a candidate for treatment by the present invention at any concentration of solids that does not prevent the addition of kinetic energy and a reagent in amounts sufficient to accomplish reduction of the solids.
  • the solution may contain any level of solids that still allows relatively rapid pumping through a conduit system, although quicker results are achieved with lower concentrations of solids.
  • a thick solution may be diluted either before or during processing to achieve a concentration that is more efficiently treated.
  • the concentration of solids in the influent is commonly referred to as the "strength" of the wastewater.
  • the wastewater strength in raw sewage is relatively low and typically ranges from about 350 to about 1,200 ppm.
  • the strength of sludge is relatively high and usually ranges from 0.5% to 6%.
  • the invention has been demonstrated to reduce the solids concentration in raw sewage, in sludge produced by wastewater treatment plants and in industrial waste produced by food processing plants, by a steel plant and by a petroleum refinery. Best results were obtained when the level of solids was adjusted to a concentration of from about 1% to about 2.5% by weight. Petroleum wastes and byproducts sometimes require physical manipulation and the application of a surfactant before optimal treatment by the present invention.
  • the invention has been demonstrated to work well in treating solutions carrying a wide variety of dissolved or suspended materials.
  • the inventive method and system have been used to treat solutions containing restaurant cooking grease, shredded restaurant trash, manure from hog farms, embalming waste, by-products from ketchup production, dialysis lab waste, pickle liquor from steel plants and material collected from septic tanks as well as raw sewage and sludge from wastewater treatment plants.
  • a variety of means can be used to add an effective level of kinetic energy to a solution.
  • Kinetic energy could be added by ultrasonic devices or by the use of cavitation technologies such as sonoluminescence, for example.
  • the inventor has achieved excellent results adding kinetic energy by using turbulent flow resulting from a designed recirculation pathway for the solution to be treated.
  • the solution is recirculated in a container having a rectangular cross section, for example, the drain in the bottom of the container is offset from the center, causing two vortices in the solution.
  • the first vortex appears to be centered around the offset drain while the second or harmonic vortex appears to be defined by the volume and shape of the container.
  • a portion of the walls of the two vortices intersect, creating turbulence in the area of collision. Dramatically improved reduction of solids in embalming waste was observed during the operation of this device.
  • turbulent flow was achieved by rapid recirculation of solution contained in a cylindrical tank having its cylindrical axis parallel to the ground using a centrifugal electric pump system to withdraw solution from the tank through ports in its bottom, resulting in vortices having intersecting walls in the solution with each vortex centered on a port.
  • Tanks with two and three ports have been used with good results.
  • Both sub'surface vortices and vortices with central depressions have been observed in systems that successfully perform the inventive process. Whether the vortex has a central depression appears to depend on the speed of recirculation of the solution relative to the size of the container in which the solution is processed. Either type of vortex appears to be useful as long as there are at least two vortices with intersecting walls.
  • Kinetic energy is believed to be added to the solution by turbulent flow resulting from collision of the intersecting vortex walls.
  • Turbulent flow is enhanced in a preferred embodiment by re-circulating the solution to be treated through a recirculation pathway such that solution withdrawn from ports in the bottom of a container is returned through return ports located so that the solution re-enters the container at high speed and in collision with the vortices at the point at which the vortices' walls are already in turbulent collision, thus adding to the turbulence of the flow and imparting further kinetic energy.
  • the solution being returned to the tank was forced at high speed through fan shaped return ports positioned to direct the flow of the returning solution along the vertical length of intersection of the colliding vortices.
  • the fan shaped return ports were designed to have the same total cross section as the conduit that feeds into them.
  • the method of the present invention has been practiced in both batch mode and flow- through mode with good results.
  • batch mode a tank or container was filled with a solution to be treated, and recirculation of the solution was started through a kinetic energy subsystem comprising a recirculation pathway.
  • the pathway included conduit leading from ports in the bottom of a cylindrical tank to a pump outside the tank and from the pump to inlet ports on the side of the tank positioned to direct returning fluid to the vicinity of the intersecting walls of vortices arising from the exit ports.
  • the reagent was added before circulation was started and in other cases reagent was added after circulation was already underway.
  • the solution was re-circulated in the tank by means of a similar kinetic energy sub-system including a recirculation pathway that collected solution through a plurality of ports in the bottom of the tank and returned the solution to the tank through ports positioned to direct returning solution at the location within the tank of the intersecting vortex walls set up by the withdrawal of the solution.
  • the recirculation pathway in the fiow-through system included a pump for accomplishing movement of the reagent solution through the recirculation pathway.
  • a portion of the treated effluent can be returned to the system. It has been observed that the treated effluent continues to reduce the amount of any remaining solids for some time after exiting the system.
  • the pump that extracts wastewater from the drain or drains and circulates it back into the container through the inlet ports can be any type of pump sufficient to perform this function.
  • the pump is typically a centrifugal pump and may include a grinding function.
  • the operating face of the centrifugal pumps showed no signs of cavitation when inspected after lengthy experimental testing.
  • the solution was contained in a substantially closed system during recirculation so that the recirculating material is not allowed to vent to the atmosphere from the system.
  • the system was closed with sufficient tightness to prevent leaking of any foam that might develop during recirculation.
  • An expansion tank was installed in the batch process systems to receive and hold any foam that developed.
  • Batch processing tanks usually included a sampling port for collecting samples for testing prior to emptying the system.
  • the batch systems were usually emptied into municipal sewer systems after processing and testing were complete.
  • Foam generated in the flow-thru process was usually transferred along with treated solution from the processing tank to an optional injection tank of approximately equal size by gravity flow through a closed conduit.
  • Treated solution produced by the flow-thru system was produced as effluent from the injection tank.
  • the dwell time in the injection tank was effective to allow foam to dissipate before the effluent was finally produced.
  • the injection tank included an optional pump for stirring the material or for emptying the injection tank when gravity flow could not be used.
  • the device includes ports for loading influent solution and for producing effluent. In a fiow'thru system the influent stream has been loaded and the effluent stream has been produced in a variety of ways.
  • influent was pumped into the processing tank where it displaced processed solution, which was pushed out of the processing tank and into the injection tank by the new influent.
  • influent can be added to the processing tank in a flow-thru system at any location and in any manner that doesn't interfere with the creation and maintenance of the colliding vortices.
  • influent was added to the recirculating sub-system and effluent was produced through a port construction similar to that found in residential septic tanks.
  • Sampling ports were positioned in the flow-thru system to enable sampling of influent, effluent from the recirculation tank and effluent from the injection tank. Each sampling port included a hand-operated valve that was opened from time to time to collect samples for testing from the influent, the effluent from the processing tank and the effluent from the injection tank.
  • the system When the system is used to treat municipal wastewater or sludge it may further include pre-loading grinders or macerators for reducing the size of solids in the wastewater or a bar screen for blocking large non-waste items such as rocks.
  • Devices such as that described in connection with Fig. 3 have been found to operate without clogging when loaded with wastewater containing pieces no larger than about 3.0 inches in diameter. The particle size, however, can be much larger in larger systems and is restricted only by a desire not to clog the pump or pumps.
  • the device also may include ports by which sensors can be placed in actual or optical contact with the solution to monitor parameters critical to determining its condition or its suitability for reintroduction to the environment. Sensors can monitor the turbidity of the solution, its oxygen concentration, and the like.
  • Information obtained by the sensors can be used to control, for example, recirculation speed, the addition of reagent or other treatment materials, and the flow of material to be treated through the system in flow-thru embodiments.
  • An experimental device was made from high density polyvinyl chloride
  • Useful re-circulation speeds will depend on the size of the overall system. Satisfactory reduction of solids has been observed at speeds as low as 30 gallons per minute in smaller systems holding about 30 gallons of wastewater. Systems holding up to 100 gallons of waste water have been found to satisfactorily reduce the level of solids in wastewater at recirculation speeds of around 200 gallons per minute. Solids in WAS at a municipal waste treatment facility have been effectively reduced in a 1,200 gallon flow-thru tank re-circulating at about 5,000 gallons per minute. The lowest re-circulation speed at which any particular system/oxidizer combination is effective depends on a variety of factors such as the type and concentration of material constituting the solids and on the type and concentration of the reagent and cannot be determined in isolation.
  • the preferred maximum solids concentration in sludge for efficient use of the system was found to be about 2.5% when treated in a 1,200 gallon system at a recirculation speed of 5,000 gal/min while adding a 50% H 2 O 2 , solution as a reagent, although substantial reductions in solids have been shown in sludge having a solids concentration of 14% in such a system. It is sometimes useful to dilute sludge with wastewater (sewage plant influent) until the solids concentration reaches a level at which it can be re-circulated at an effective speed. In a municipal wastewater treatment plant, for example, solutions that have an undesirably high solids concentration can be diluted not only with water but also with plant influent or plant effluent.
  • a viscous material from a petroleum processing plant was successfully dispersed in water with the aid of a surfactant and a mechanical mixer sufficiently for processing in the system of the present invention.
  • effluent from the inventive system was used to dilute influent WAS sludge, surprisingly resulting in successful reductions of solids with much less reagent.
  • the reagent has been added to the solution both before and during the addition of kinetic energy.
  • reagent was sometimes added to the solution before recirculation was started and at other times during recirculation.
  • reagent normally was added simultaneously with the addition of kinetic energy.
  • Reagent usually was added to the solution by means of a reagent sub-system.
  • the reagent sub-system especially in batch-processing systems, can be as simple as a closeable port in the top of a processing tank that can be opened to receive the reagent and then closed.
  • the reagent has been injected into the moving solution at a variety of points.
  • reagent was added to the influent stream.
  • Reagent also has been injected into the recirculation pathway both before and after the recirculation pump or pumps.
  • a preferred location for adding reagent is in the return port where the re-circulated solution is being returned to the processing tank and directed into the turbulence resulting from the colliding vortex walls.
  • the reagent was injected into the recirculating solution at a return port through a small diameter pipe positioned in a recirculation port whereby the recirculating solution formed a fast-moving annular jacket around the reagent stream as it exited the pipe.
  • Addition of the reagent was metered by a control device that calculated the amount of reagent to inject by taking into account the density and flow rate of the influent.
  • the reagent may be any material that when added to the solution will result in a greater reduction of solids in the solution upon addition of kinetic energy than results when no reagent is added. It is believed that the full scope of useful reagents is not presently known. Oxidizers such as chlorine, hydrogen peroxide, ozone and oxygen have been tried, and each of them has been found to be useful to some degree. Sodium chloride also has been used as a reagent. At the present time the best results have been obtained in a batch processing system with chlorine supplied by household bleach and with hydrogen peroxide
  • Sodium chloride has been used as a reagent when salt and earth were mixed in an effort to duplicate seawater concentrations.
  • the solution was batch processed in a 10 gallon table top experimental unit for eight minutes at 30 gallons per minute recirculation speed without the addition of additional reagent.
  • the resulting solution was substantially clear of visible particles and did not taste of salt, suggesting the process is useful in desalination and for producing potable from available salty or turbulent sources.
  • the amount of reagent used is waste-stream specific and may vary greatly from application to application, as can be seen in the examples below, and is believed to depend not only on the concentration of solids in the solution but also on the type of solid material carried by the solution. Different reagents will work more effectively in connection with specific materials.
  • the type and amount of reagent that is useful in connection with a specific solution also may vary depending on whether a batch process or a flow-thru process is used. It has been observed that the amount of reagent added to obtain significant reductions in solids is stoichiometrically insufficient to result in the observed solids reductions by chemical reaction alone. In a fiow-thru process, for example, when the solution being treated was sludge having a strength of from about 2% to about 4% from a wastewater treatment plant, two to three liters of a peroxide reagent were added for each hundred gallons of influent with excellent results. When 100 gallon of raw sewage was batch processed, one quart of household chlorine bleach was determined by experimentation to provide excellent reduction of solids.
  • Solids in a solution of starch solids were significantly reduced and the solution's BOD was substantially eliminated when treated in a 30 gallon bench top model of the system by recycling at about 30 gallons per minute in the presence a cup of household bleach.
  • Pickle liquor from a steel plant showed approximately 80% reduction in solids and about 90% reduction in BOD after the addition to a 30 gallon solution of a quart of household bleach and turbulent kinetic energy.
  • a large amount of metallic iron was recovered from the system effluent by magnetic extraction.
  • optimal time for processing a specific solution-reagent combination in either a batch or fiow-thru process will vary greatly but can be determined for various waste streams by routine experimentation.
  • Municipal wastewater treatment plants also usually measure dissolved solids, volatile solids, suspended solids, and total solids in both influent and effluent.
  • the reduction of solids in wastewater by the present invention has been demonstrated by each of these measurements.
  • the chemical/physical reaction that results in relatively rapid reduction in the level of solids in a solution has not been fully characterized. It is known the phenomenon is related to the addition of a reagent and kinetic energy to a solution. It is believed at least some of the solids in the wastewater are oxidized.
  • the effluent appears to be saturated or supersaturated with oxygen.
  • the elevated dissolved oxygen content of effluent from the present flow-through system allowed reduced use of blowers in a municipal wastewater treatment plant when effluent from the present experimental system was returned to the headworks of the plant.
  • the mechanism that causes continued reduction in the volume of solids in the solution while the treated solution is in the injection tank is not fully understood at the moment but is thought to be related to the high oxygen content that the solution acquires during treatment.
  • the exact increase in the oxygen content is not presently known, but it was observed that standard oxygen sensors instantly peg at 20% when contacted with the system effluent.
  • the increased oxygen content is believed to be responsible for the appearance of small bubbles or "microbubbles" in the treated liquid or on the inside walls of containers holding treated effluent.
  • the elevated oxygen level can last for some time, and has been useful in aerating the water in a sewage treatment plant in which the system effluent was returned to the headworks.
  • the continued activity of the effluent is used to improve the efficiency of the inventive system by returning a portion of the effluent from the injection tank to the process tank.
  • the injection tank effluent has been returned to the process tank at a variety of locations, all with good results.
  • effluent from the injection tank has been used to dilute the influent to the process tank at levels as high as two parts effluent to one part incoming WAS when then wastewater treated was a WAS slurry. Returning the treated effluent to the processing tank has been found to reduce the amount of reagent required by the system to effectively reduce solids in a solution.
  • the device of the present invention may be located at remote CSO outfalls and fitted with sensors for high water levels causing it to start operation when needed.
  • the remotely located device, or a group of them, can be monitored or controlled from a central location using well known technologies such as telephone lines, radio and internet networks.
  • FIG. 1 shows a single drain embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a multiple drain embodiment of the invention for use in batch processing.
  • FIG. 3 shows a multiple drain embodiment of the invention suitable for use in flow- through processing.
  • FIG. 4 shows the currently optimal device for adding reagent in a device of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 shows in schematic perspective view one embodiment of the present invention comprising a substantially rectangular container 1 having a capacity of about 30 gallons, although any size container may be useful, depending on the particular application. Internal features of the container are shown by dotted lines. Vortex port 2 is connected by pipe 3 to pump 4. Pipe 5 connects pump 4 with return port 6 on the side of container 1. Container 1 also supports fill connector 7, exit drain 8 and closed reagent port 9 which may be opened to add reagent to container 1 either before or during processing. Connector 7 and drain 8 include closeable valves 10 and 11 for controlling the flow of wastewater into container 1 and treated water away from container 1. Vortex port 2 is offset from the center of the bottom of container 1.
  • a vortex 15 shown in dotted lines, having its small end at drain 2 is established.
  • "Harmonic vortex" 16 also shown in dotted lines, also is established in the container.
  • the vortices exist in the wastewater in container 1 although the surface of the wastewater can be substantially undisturbed and there are no sounds or other indications of cavitation.
  • the shape of vortices 15 and 16 may be variable and dynamic, especially during the start of circulation. However, the edges of vortices 15 and 16 collide at a location generally designated as 17. Re-circulating wastewater enters container 1 in the vicinity of location 17 and is directed to location 17 by placement of port 6.
  • the device of FIG. 1 was made of pre-cast PVC sheets assembled by PVC welding, with ports made by drilling followed by welding of PVC fittings.
  • the pump used was an Armstrong open face centrifugal pump adapted for recirculating the water in the tank at the rate of 30 gallons per minute.
  • Fig. 2 shows in schematic perspective view a device 20 according to the present invention having multiple vortex ports 21, the device being suitable for batch processing of solutions.
  • Closed tank 22 includes closable filling and reagent port 23.
  • Port 23 can be positioned substantially anywhere on the tank surface that will be above the surface level of solution 24 during processing. In the preferred embodiment shown in Fig. 2 port 23 is positioned approximately above the location 25 of the intersection of vortices 26 and 26a that eminate from ports 23. Such positioning of port 23 allows reagent to be added at the location of greatest turbulence in solution 24.
  • solution 24 is withdrawn from device 2 through vortex ports 21 and conduit system 28 by centrifugal pump 27. Pump 27 is driven by motor 29. Vortices 26 and 26a develop around vortex ports 21 and intersect at location 25. Solution 24 is returned to device 20 through return conduit system 210 and return port 211. Return port 211 is positioned so that returning solution 24 is directed at high speed toward location 25, adding to the turbulence caused by the intersection of vortices 26 and 26a. After processing, the solution can be removed through port 212.
  • Fig. 3 shows device 30 according to the present invention adapted for flow-through operation.
  • Processing tank 325 includes vortex ports 31a, 31b and 31c positioned along its bottom and connected by conduit system 32 to centrifugal pumps 33a and 33b, which are operated by electrical motors 34a and 34b respectively.
  • Conduit system 32 also is connected to solution supply conduit 35 through which a solution 37 to be treated is supplied.
  • the use of multiple pumps and motors provide device 30 with the ability to continue in operation in the event one of them must be stopped temporarily for servicing, or the like.
  • Solution 37 that is withdrawn by pumps 33a and 33b through conduit system 32 is returned to device 30 through return conduits 38a and 38b, manifold 39 and return ports 313a and 313b, forming a recirculation pathway.
  • vorticies 36a, 36b and 36c arise from vortex ports 31a, 31b and 31c as recirculation of solution 37 reaches higher speeds, creating areas of high turbulence 310a and 310b where the vortices intersect.
  • Solution 37 is returned to device 30 through return ports 313a and 313b, which are positioned to direct the returning solution at high speed to the areas of turbulence 310a and 310b, further increasing the turbulence.
  • Reagent from reagent supply tank 311 is added to recirculating solution 37 through return ports 313a and 313b and supply conduit 312.
  • Sensor 314 can be used to measure the density of the incoming solution 37 in supply conduit 35.
  • Results from the sensor can be sent through electrical cable 315 to valve 316 to regulate the flow of reagent as a function of the density of the incoming solution.
  • Treated solution is displaced from tank 325 through exit port 317.
  • Exit port 317 receives treated solution 37 from near the bottom of device 30 through feed tube 318.
  • treated solution 37 is fed by gravity into optional injection tank 319 through conduit 320.
  • injection tank 319 is approximately the same size as device 30 and enables defoaming of treated solution 37.
  • Treated solution 37 is displaced from injection tank 318 through effluent port 321 and, in this illustrative example, returned to a municipal wastewater headworks through grating 322.
  • Injection tank 319 may include pump 326 which operates through conduit 327 and distributor 328 to circulate treated solution 37 in injection tank 319. Pump 326 also can operate through conduit 327, conduit 329 and remote effluent port 330 to move treated solution 37 to a remote delivery point when tank 319 is positioned so that treated solution 37 cannot be delivered to a delivery point by gravity flow.
  • pump 326 can operate through conduit systems 329 and 331 to deliver treated solution 37 to influent solution in conduit 35 or to recirculating solution in conduit 32.
  • Pump 326 and conduit system 329 also may be used to deliver treated solution to tank 325 through ports 332a and 332b; which, in the embodiment shown in Fig. 3, are positioned over areas of turbulence 310a and 310b, respectively.
  • Ports for returning treated solution directly to tank 325 may be positioned at substantially any location that does not interfere with the creation of vortices with intersecting walls in solution 37.
  • Figs 4a and 4b show the currently optimal device 41 for returning recirculated solution 37 to the area of turbulence 313a or 313b.
  • Device 41 comprises a conduit 42 that brings recirculated solution 37 through ports 313a or 313b in the wall of tank 325.
  • Device 41 may comprise the end of manifold 39.
  • End 45 of device 41 that is inside device 30 is reshaped so that it directs the flow of recirculated solution 37 into a vertical fan shape that strikes area of turbulence 310a or 310b along its length, maximizing the turbulence added by the recirculated solution 37.
  • Reagent is added to the recirculating solution through conduit 43, which is fed by supply conduit 312. Introducing the reagent at the point of maximum turbulence, as solution 37 exits shaped end portion 45 and substantially instantly contacts an area of turbulence such as 310a or 310b, is believed to maximize the efficiency of the operation of the device 30.
  • Fig. 4b shows that the cross-sectional area of the reshaped conduit 42 does not form a nozzle.
  • the inside diameter of the reshaped end of conduit 42 is approximately the same as the inside diameter of the portion of conduit 42 that has a circular diameter.
  • the treated material was passed through the filter and emptied into a municipal sewer. No sludge or sludge-like material collected in the filter, and no sludge or particulate matter remained in the container or plumbing. The small amount (about a thimble full) of material found in the filter was tested by spectrographic methods and found to contain no organics.
  • Example 2 The test as described in Example 1 was repeated using sanitary waste from a Middle
  • the CBOD assay showed a level of 223 mg/L prior to processing and a level of 2.50 after 4 minutes of processing, a 98.9% reduction.
  • the NH 3 test showed 11.1 mg/L prior to processing and 0.358 mg/L after processing, a 98.6% reduction.
  • Examples 1, 2 and 3 indicate that CBOD levels and NH 3 levels in municipal waste can be reduced dramatically in a very short period of time by the device and method of the present invention and that only inorganic materials of a size sufficient to be collected in a filter remain in the solution.
  • Example 4 Process waste obtained from a commercial food processor was processed in the device described in connection with FIG. 1 for four minutes. An assay of the waste prior to processing showed a CBOD level of 432,000 mg/L. An assay of the material after 10 minutes of processing showed a CBOD level of 4.3 mg/L. A second sample of material showed a CBOD of 156,000 mg/L prior to processing a 8.4 mg/L after four minutes of processing.
  • Example 4 indicates the usefulness of the present device and method in reducing
  • Example 5 Waste material from a nursing home, including medical materials, discarded bandages, syringes, and the like, was processed according to Example 4.
  • the waste material showed a CBOD level of 69.0 mg/L prior to processing and a CBOD level of 3.1 mg/L after processing for four minutes.
  • the NH3 concentration of the nursing home waste was 12.1 mg/L prior to testing and 0.74 mg/L after testing.
  • Example 5 indicates the usefulness of the device and method of the present invention is disposing of infectious waste.
  • Example 6 Two samples of process waste from an oil refinery were treated as in Examples 4 and 5 except that a surfactant was added to help put the tar-like waste into an aqueous solution.
  • CBOD levels of 249,000 mg/L before processing and 3.2 mg/L after processing for four minutes.
  • the second sample showed CBOD levels of 31,000 mg/L prior to processing and 1.0 mg/L after processing.
  • Example 6 shows the usefulness of the device and method of the present invention in treating petroleum-based industrial waste and indicates that process aids, such as surfactants, do not interfere with the operation of the device.
  • Example 8 Anaerobic sludge produced by a municipal wastewater treatment plant was processed in the experimental flow-through process as described in connection with Fig. 3 and the effluent was delivered to a drying bed having a sand bottom that allowed liquids to return to the headworks of the treatment plant. Over three months about 500,000 U.S. gallons of treated solution was delivered to a single drying bed. Thereafter, five truck loads of material were removed from the floor of the drying bed and disposed of in a landfill. According to wastewater treatment plant records, 500,000 gallons of untreated sludge of the same solids concentration delivered to identical drying beds resulted in 60 truckloads of material being transported to a landfill. The reduction in material that had to be hauled away was 91.3%.
  • a sludge slurry comprising anaerobic sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant was processed in an experimental 1,200 gal. flow-through system of the type described in Fig. 3.
  • the contents of the system were re-circulated as described in connection with Fig. 3 at an average rate of about 5,000 gal. per minute.
  • the rate of flow of the sludge solution into and out of the system was monitored and recorded as was the rate of addition of oxidizer.
  • the oxidizer was hydrogen peroxide (50% V/V in aqueous solution).
  • the optically measured density of the influent sludge solution varied over time, and the rate of addition of oxidizer was adjusted in response.
  • Two sets of samples were drawn from the system influent and effluent at different influent densities and were assayed for certain parameters as shown in
  • Table 9 also shows the rate of flow of the influent and the amount of reagent added. The following is a key to abbreviations used in Table 9.
  • TSS total suspended solids
  • VSS volatile suspended solids
  • COD chemical oxygen demand
  • TKN total Kjeldhal nitrogen
  • Ammonia-N Ammonia N by distillation
  • TP total phosphorous
  • Table 9 show that the system of the present invention is useful to quickly and effectively reduce total suspended solids, volatile suspended solids, total COD's nitrogen and ammonia in sludge from a wastewater treatment plant.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Physical Water Treatments (AREA)

Abstract

La concentration de matières solides dissoutes ou en suspension dans un liquide est réduite lorsqu'un réactif et de l'énergie cinétique sont ajoutés à la solution. L'énergie cinétique peut être ajoutée par écoulement turbulent dans un dispositif de recirculation. La séparation des matières solides de la solution est notamment favorisée lorsque le courant liquide recirculé est amené dans la région d'intersection des tourbillons de collision ou de croisement dans un récipient contenant le liquide d'intérêt. Ces tourbillons de croisement peuvent être créés par retrait d'un courant liquide par au moins un orifice placé de manière appropriée dans le récipient. Les solutions peuvent être des déchets industriels, médicaux, agricoles et urbains, et des eaux d'origine naturelle nécessitant une purification.
PCT/US2009/053499 2008-08-11 2009-08-11 Dispositif et procédé pour éliminer des matières solides d'une solution Ceased WO2010019633A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18870408P 2008-08-11 2008-08-11
US61/188,704 2008-08-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010019633A1 true WO2010019633A1 (fr) 2010-02-18

Family

ID=41669258

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2009/053499 Ceased WO2010019633A1 (fr) 2008-08-11 2009-08-11 Dispositif et procédé pour éliminer des matières solides d'une solution

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2010019633A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2826752A1 (fr) * 2010-10-29 2015-01-21 Orege Procédé de clarification des eaux contenant des structures colloïdales
GR20160100453A (el) * 2016-09-01 2018-05-18 Αθανασιος Αντωνιου Διαμαντοπουλος Επαναχρησιμοποιηση υγρων αστικων αποβλητων απο μοναδες τεχνητου νεφρου(διηθημα αιμοκαθαρσης με στοιχεια θρεψης) για αρδευση και κυριως λιπανση φυτικων ειδων οπως και αλλες χρησεις με σκοπο την εξοικονομηση υδατικων πορων και βιομηχανικων λιπασματων.
WO2022266024A1 (fr) * 2021-06-18 2022-12-22 Mid-Continent Energy Company Inc. Systèmes et procédés de mélange automatisé de réservoirs

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3898068A (en) * 1974-05-31 1975-08-05 John A Mcneil Cyclonic separator
US4234350A (en) * 1979-05-07 1980-11-18 Davies Hamakua Sugar Co., A Division Of Theo. H. Davies, Ltd. Process for the purification of evaporated sugar solutions
US4416786A (en) * 1981-06-29 1983-11-22 Degussa Process for the treatment of continuous waste water streams having changing contents of different oxidizable materials with hydrogen peroxide
US5229014A (en) * 1991-12-18 1993-07-20 Vortech International, Inc. High efficiency centrifugal separation apparatus and method using impeller
US5456596A (en) * 1989-08-24 1995-10-10 Energy Innovations, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing multivortex fluid flow
US5543087A (en) * 1993-12-17 1996-08-06 Coors Brewing Company Multi-function fluid treatment system and method for using the same
US5549854A (en) * 1994-05-20 1996-08-27 Outokumpu Engineering Contractors Oy Method and apparatus for forming controlled vortexes and for recirculating gas
US5562822A (en) * 1993-01-15 1996-10-08 Sun River Innovations, Ltd. Apparatus for removing contaminants from waste fluids
US6117334A (en) * 1995-01-10 2000-09-12 Coury; William S. Decontamination reactor system and method of using same
US6217778B1 (en) * 1999-09-08 2001-04-17 Nalco Chemical Company Anionic and nonionic dispersion polymers for clarification and dewatering
US6478969B2 (en) * 1996-09-06 2002-11-12 Pall Corporation Shear separation method and system
US6712981B2 (en) * 1998-01-28 2004-03-30 James Benenson, Jr. Method of cleaning a cylindrical water strainer utilizing reverse flow and ultrasonic energy
US6869534B2 (en) * 2002-05-05 2005-03-22 Brentwood Industries, Inc. Sludge digestion methods and apparatus
US7291267B2 (en) * 2004-01-30 2007-11-06 Ljc Technologies, L.L.C. Molecular separator

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3898068A (en) * 1974-05-31 1975-08-05 John A Mcneil Cyclonic separator
US4234350A (en) * 1979-05-07 1980-11-18 Davies Hamakua Sugar Co., A Division Of Theo. H. Davies, Ltd. Process for the purification of evaporated sugar solutions
US4416786A (en) * 1981-06-29 1983-11-22 Degussa Process for the treatment of continuous waste water streams having changing contents of different oxidizable materials with hydrogen peroxide
US5456596A (en) * 1989-08-24 1995-10-10 Energy Innovations, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing multivortex fluid flow
US5229014A (en) * 1991-12-18 1993-07-20 Vortech International, Inc. High efficiency centrifugal separation apparatus and method using impeller
US5562822A (en) * 1993-01-15 1996-10-08 Sun River Innovations, Ltd. Apparatus for removing contaminants from waste fluids
US5543087A (en) * 1993-12-17 1996-08-06 Coors Brewing Company Multi-function fluid treatment system and method for using the same
US5549854A (en) * 1994-05-20 1996-08-27 Outokumpu Engineering Contractors Oy Method and apparatus for forming controlled vortexes and for recirculating gas
US6117334A (en) * 1995-01-10 2000-09-12 Coury; William S. Decontamination reactor system and method of using same
US6478969B2 (en) * 1996-09-06 2002-11-12 Pall Corporation Shear separation method and system
US6712981B2 (en) * 1998-01-28 2004-03-30 James Benenson, Jr. Method of cleaning a cylindrical water strainer utilizing reverse flow and ultrasonic energy
US6217778B1 (en) * 1999-09-08 2001-04-17 Nalco Chemical Company Anionic and nonionic dispersion polymers for clarification and dewatering
US6869534B2 (en) * 2002-05-05 2005-03-22 Brentwood Industries, Inc. Sludge digestion methods and apparatus
US7291267B2 (en) * 2004-01-30 2007-11-06 Ljc Technologies, L.L.C. Molecular separator

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2826752A1 (fr) * 2010-10-29 2015-01-21 Orege Procédé de clarification des eaux contenant des structures colloïdales
GR20160100453A (el) * 2016-09-01 2018-05-18 Αθανασιος Αντωνιου Διαμαντοπουλος Επαναχρησιμοποιηση υγρων αστικων αποβλητων απο μοναδες τεχνητου νεφρου(διηθημα αιμοκαθαρσης με στοιχεια θρεψης) για αρδευση και κυριως λιπανση φυτικων ειδων οπως και αλλες χρησεις με σκοπο την εξοικονομηση υδατικων πορων και βιομηχανικων λιπασματων.
GR1009367B (el) * 2016-09-01 2018-10-01 Αθανασιος Αντωνιου Διαμαντοπουλος Επαναχρησιμοποιηση υγρων αστικων αποβλητων απο μοναδες τεχνητου νεφρου(διηθημα αιμοκαθαρσης με στοιχεια θρεψης) για αρδευση και κυριως λιπανση φυτικων ειδων οπως και αλλες χρησεις με σκοπο την εξοικονομηση υδατικων πορων και βιομηχανικων λιπασματων
WO2022266024A1 (fr) * 2021-06-18 2022-12-22 Mid-Continent Energy Company Inc. Systèmes et procédés de mélange automatisé de réservoirs

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11161761B2 (en) Method for treating wastewater using a portable, non-biological, cyclic sewage treatment plant
Smarzewska et al. Wastewater treatment technologies
Wu et al. Effects of ultrasonic and hydrodynamic cavitation on the treatment of cork wastewater by flocculation and Fenton processes
EP1008559A1 (fr) Procédé de traitement des déchets d'origine animale
US6402945B1 (en) Water treatment system and method
Tay et al. Seafood processing wastewater treatment
Dhoble Performance evaluation of effluent treatment plant of dairy industry
US6673251B2 (en) Water treatment method
US20220177341A1 (en) Sewage treatment method
Zhu et al. Advanced treatment of microplastics and antibiotic-containing wastewater using integrated modified dissolved air flotation and pulsed cavitation-impinging stream processes
WO2010019633A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour éliminer des matières solides d'une solution
Peters et al. Pilot study: Impact of suspended solids removal technology on subsequent ozonation for sewer overflow treatment
Otunyo et al. Evaluation of the performance of the domestic wastewater treatment facility of a hotel in port harcourt, rivers state nigeria
Mastin et al. Hybrid cavitation/constructed wetland reactors for treatment of chlorinated and non‐chlorinated organics
CN106186292A (zh) 一种活性污泥处理废水的方法
Abubakar et al. Water treatment operations: case study of mada water works
El-Batrawy et al. Study on ferric chloride coagulation process and fenton’s reaction for pretreatment of dairy wastewater
CN208883674U (zh) 一种小型污水处理站
Zaman et al. Pharmaceutical waste water treatment and the efficiency of ETP in context of Bangladesh
Dash et al. Efficiency Study of Fluidized Aerobic Bioreactor Technology in Sewage Treatment Plant of Industrial Complex at Barbil, India
Chavda et al. Performance evaluation of effluent treatment plant of pharmaceutical industry
Nasr et al. Natural Gas Processing Wastewater Management
CA2385953C (fr) Systeme et methode de traitement de l'eau
JP4274596B2 (ja) 油含有排水の処理方法および処理装置
Marloth Wastewater and Water Utilities

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09807204

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 09807204

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1