[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2006046067A1 - Contrôle biologique d'insectes nuisibles - Google Patents

Contrôle biologique d'insectes nuisibles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006046067A1
WO2006046067A1 PCT/GB2005/004184 GB2005004184W WO2006046067A1 WO 2006046067 A1 WO2006046067 A1 WO 2006046067A1 GB 2005004184 W GB2005004184 W GB 2005004184W WO 2006046067 A1 WO2006046067 A1 WO 2006046067A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
pathogen
trap
lure
source
insects
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/GB2005/004184
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
David William Hartley
Alan Roy Davies
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
INTERNATIONAL PHEROMONE SYSTEMS Ltd
Original Assignee
INTERNATIONAL PHEROMONE SYSTEMS Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by INTERNATIONAL PHEROMONE SYSTEMS Ltd filed Critical INTERNATIONAL PHEROMONE SYSTEMS Ltd
Publication of WO2006046067A1 publication Critical patent/WO2006046067A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01M—CATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M1/00—Stationary means for catching or killing insects
    • A01M1/20—Poisoning, narcotising, or burning insects
    • A01M1/2005—Poisoning insects using bait stations
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01M—CATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M1/00—Stationary means for catching or killing insects
    • A01M1/20—Poisoning, narcotising, or burning insects
    • A01M1/2005—Poisoning insects using bait stations
    • A01M1/2016—Poisoning insects using bait stations for flying insects
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01M—CATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
    • A01M2200/00—Kind of animal
    • A01M2200/01—Insects
    • A01M2200/012—Flying insects

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for the biological control of insect pests in commercial crops, by assisted establishment of epizootics so as to destroy the pest populations.
  • the invention particularly concerns traps and pathogenic material dispensers for controlling insect populations.
  • the invention is discussed below in relation to arboreal agriculture and in particular in methods for controlling codling moth damage in apple and pear crops.
  • the invention is of more general applicability.
  • Arboreal agriculture such as commercial fruit growing in orchards, is an important economic activity and growers are concerned to minimise crop damage by controlling insect pests.
  • insecticides are widely used for this purpose.
  • the estimated market value of insect control products for top fruit in Europe and the Middle East in 2004 is 70 million Euros, the market value for fruit and nut insecticides in the 25 EU countiies being 5.7 million Euros.
  • insecticides to control insect pests has led to concerns over damage to human health through pesticide residues, as well as concerns over more widespread ecological damage. It is well known that insecticides, if used inappropriately, may affect "non-target" organisms, may persist in the environment and may become concentrated in the food chain. For ecological as well as economic reasons, growers are therefore being encouraged to reduce their pesticide inputs and target them more precisely on pest species by adopting integrated pest management techniques.
  • One such technique is to use insect traps, baited with the appropriate synthetic pheromone lure, to monitor insect numbers so as to be able to time the application of insecticides for maximum effect. Pheromone lures are also used for insect population control by mating disruption. Certain insecticides, such as organophosphates, judged to be particularly harmful to the environment, have recently been withdrawn from the EU market. There is thus a need for alternative insect pest control strategies.
  • the codling moth (Cydia pomonella) is an orchard pest found throughout apple and pear production areas worldwide. The moth lays its eggs on fruit and the moth larvae will bore into the core of the apple or pear with the resultant feeding damage leaving the fruit unsaleable. During any season several generations may be produced, depending on climatic conditions. Pheromone traps have been used to monitor moth numbers so that insecticide spraying can be timed to coincide with egg hatch. However, with this technique destruction of the insects is still entirely dependent on the application of insecticides.
  • Bioinsecticides also have their drawbacks. They are relatively expensive and, though selected to be particularly harmful to a target range of organisms, may nevertheless exhibit a fairly broad spectrum of activity so that they still destroy beneficial or harmless species as well as the target pests. To be effective in reaching the target population in lethal dosages over a short timescale, bioinsecticides may have to be applied to the crop in undesirably large quantities, adding to the environmental risks. Their efficacy may also be affected by climatic factors such as temperature and humidity and their lethal effects may be relatively short-lived, so that repeated applications are often necessary. They may also be too specific to target entire pest complexes in a given crop.
  • the invention provides a trap for use in controlling insect pests, as defined in claim 1.
  • the trap comprises a pathogen source and a lure attractive to the insects, and an outer surface providing an alighting point for flying insect pests attracted by the lure, the trap directing the insects onto the pathogen source and allowing the insects to return to the environment.
  • the invention provides a trap for use in controlling insect pests, as defined in claim 11. With such a trap, the insects may fly around the lure, passing into and out of the pheromone plume, with the pathogen source positioned such that the insects brush or knock against it or pass through a pathogen shower emanating from it, so as thus to become inoculated with pathogen in flight.
  • the trap may comprise a housing having one or more entry apertures through which a semiochemical is emitted from the lure and through which the attracted insect pests enter the housing.
  • a downwardly inclined, preferably funnel-shaped surface leads the insects away from the entry aperture(s) towards the pathogen source situated within the housing.
  • the funnel may for example be shaped as an inverted cone or pyramid.
  • the housing preferably comprises one or more apertures through which the insects exit the trap structure after having habituated to the semiochemical and passed through or across the pathogen source.
  • the trap may comprise spaced upper and lower plates between which the lure and pathogen source are positioned.
  • the spacing between the plates defines generally open sides of a structure through which the attracted insect pests can enter and leave.
  • the lure is preferably positioned above the pathogen source towards the centre of the plates.
  • the upper plate has a larger diameter so as to overhang the lower plate. The upper plate shields the lower plate, lure and pathogen source and the lower plate accommodates the pathogen source and helps direct the flying insects onto it.
  • the invention provides a pathogen source for use in an assisted autodissemination pest trap, as defined in claim 16.
  • the pathogen source may comprise an open-topped container for pathogen in powder form.
  • the powder may be covered by porous material such as gauze, or may be impregnated into a porous pad, to prevent overloading of the insect pests with the pathogen.
  • the primary source of pathogen close to the lure need not be large in quantity, but can be sufficiently concentrated so that a substantial and sufficient proportion of insects attracted to the lure become pathogen carriers.
  • the carrier insects thus act as an effective means of transporting the pathogen to the general population of pest insects in the crop (autodissemination).
  • the pathogen is transmitted from carriers to infect hitherto non-carriers by the normal encounters between individuals in the orchard population, for example during foraging or mating. This may include encounters between different stages in the insect lifecycle (permutations of egg, larva, pupa, and adult in the case of the codling moth and other Lepidoptera).
  • the transmission mechanism may vary from one pathogen to another, the infectious agents for example being transferred by contact or air currents; by being eaten or by ingestion during respiration; in body fluids, in moisture; or combinations of such mechanisms.
  • the rate of transfer and the rate of infection by the pathogen within the crop pest population can be high enough to establish an epizootic and so destroy the majority or a substantial proportion of the insect pest population, whereby insect damage to the crop is reduced or substantially eliminated.
  • the lure may be effective to attract a particular insect pest or a defined set of insect pests.
  • its active ingredient may comprise a semiochemical attractive to a group of insect pests or a particular insect pest. Precise attraction of a single pest species can be achieved using a sex pheromone.
  • the lure may be non-chemical, such as a light source used to attract nocturnal insects. Particular wavelengths may be used to attract particular species groups.
  • the pathogen may be selected to be effective against a range of pest species.
  • a lure can be used which is attractive to a narrower set of insect pests (e.g. a complex of pest species associated with a particular crop) or a single insect pest species.
  • the insect pest control method can be tuned to a particular pest species or a relatively precise set of pests, minimising its effects on beneficial or other non-target species.
  • the pathogen can be chosen to be effective against a fairly broad range of insect pests, the lure will ensure that the primary source of infection acts solely upon a target species or set of species attracted to it.
  • the carrier individuals will return to their habitat, often preferentially to that part of the habitat actually populated by other insects of their species, so the opportunities for non-target organisms in other habitats to become infected with the pathogen are small.
  • the epizootic is thus substantially confined to the target species or set of species governed by the lure, despite the broader efficacy of the pathogen.
  • both the lure and the pathogen can be targeted to a particular species or small group of species so that the control method is doubly tuned or filtered so as to target the selected species set very precisely, with no significant effects on other species, such as other species sharing the same habitat.
  • the pathogen comprises a fungus or similar organism whose reproductive cycle includes the production of infective units (for fungi these are spores) thereby increasing the chances of infecting other target individuals.
  • the pathogen may comprise a fungus selected from the group Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae and Paecilomyces fumosoroseus.
  • the pathogen may be provided in the form of (dry) fungal spores, although other formulations are possible for suitable retention to form the primary source until they are picked up by the target insects attracted by the lure.
  • the pathogen may likewise be suitably formulated to aid its acquisition by or inoculation of the target insects.
  • the lure preferably comprises a pheromone specifically attractive to the target pest species (for example codling moth).
  • the pheromone formulation and/or lure construction preferably provides for slow release and hence a sufficiently long field life to provide effective crop protection with minimal field maintenance.
  • the lure and pathogen are arranged in a trap structure (autoinoculator) which provides an alighting point for flying insect pests attracted b ⁇ ' the lure and which directs the insects onto the pathogen source.
  • a trap structure autoinoculator
  • the trap structure preferably retains the insects in contact with the pathogen source for a sufficient period to acquire an effective amount of pathogen.
  • the trap structure advantageously protects the pathogen source against the weather and wind dispersal and provides improved conditions (temperature, humidity, UV shielding, etc.) for preservation of the pathogen and inoculation of the insects with the pathogen or acquisition of the pathogen by the insects.
  • the control method preferably comprises distributing a plurality of the lures and associated pathogen sources throughout the crop, so that the insect pests carry and distribute pathogen to their habitat throughout the crop.
  • the lures are preferably spaced at intervals of less than 40m, more preferably 20m or less.
  • Each lure and associated pathogen source is advantageously positioned at a height where the lures operate efficiently to attract the target insects - in the case of codling moth, preferably in the upper half, more preferably the upper third, of the orchard canopy.
  • Figure 1 is a somewhat diagrammatic section through a first insect trap embodying the invention and Figure 2 is a somewhat diagrammatic section through a second such trap.
  • the trap shown in Figure 1 is a modified form of the "castellated" insect monitoring trap available from Oecos Limited, UK (www.oecos.co.uk).
  • the modified trap 10 comprises an opaque lid 12 having a depending castellated skirt 14.
  • the castellations define entrance apertures 16 for insect pests such as the codling moth.
  • a snap-in basket 18 with apertures 19 and a removable cap 20 is fixed in a centre hole in the lid 12.
  • a rubber septum 22 impregnated with a synthetic pheromone or other semiochemical attractive to the insect pest whose population is to be controlled is placed in the basket 19.
  • the septum 22 is porous so as to slowly release the pheromone over a period of several weeks.
  • a porous polyethylene vial can be used to contain and controllably release the semiochemical.
  • Such septa and vials are known for use in forming pheromone-releasing lures for insect monitoring traps, and are commercially available.
  • the septum 22 is held approximately level with the apertures 16 so that cross currents of air can carry the pheromone into the environment and attract the insect pests to the entrance apertures 16.
  • the trap 10 further comprises a translucent body portion or bucket 24 fitted to the bottom of the skirt 14.
  • An opaque funnel-shaped baffle 26 is positioned between the skirt 14 and the upper rim of the bucket 24. It has been found that the downwardly inclined upper surface of the baffle 26 encourages codling moths, alighting on the outer surface of the trap and attracted through the apertures 16, to crawl through the apertures and venture further into the trap, rather than just exiting through the apertures 16 again, once they have become habituated to the pheromone.
  • the main constituent of the natural pheromone is (E 5 E) — 8,10 - dodecadienol. It has been found that rubber septa or polyethylene vials loaded with 1 - 4 mg of this compound are effective to attract male codling moths for a period of more than three weeks. The pheromone release rate is approximately proportional to loading. Besides depletion through evaporation, active pheromone is also lost through isomerisation of the conjugated diene from the E 5 E to the Z 5 E , E 5 Z and Z 5 Z isomeric forms. Experimental results suggest that this is a greater problem in the rubber septa than in the polyethylene vials.
  • the lower open end of the baffle 26 is disposed above an upwardly open dish-like container 28 for the pathogen. Insects leaving the trap 10 therefore pass downwardly through the baffle 26, through the pathogen container 28 and between the lower rim of the baffle 26 and the upper rim of the container 28, before leaving the bucket 24 trough exit slots 30.
  • the container 28 is supported from the base of the bucket 24 on a pedestal 32.
  • the pathogen 34 is placed in the container 28, in a form which will be picked up by insects passing through the container 28 as they leave the trap 10. For example dry fungal spores in loose powder form can be used. The insects will usually spend some time confined within the trap 10 before finding the exit slots 30, so that there is a good chance that they will pick up the pathogen 34 as desired.
  • the pathogen container 28 may have a porous cover 38 supported by the pathogen powder so as to control the amount of pathogen picked up by each visiting insect and prevent overloading.
  • the cover remains supported at the surface of the heap as powder is used up.
  • the porosity of the cover is sufficient to allow pathogen particles to pass through and be picked up by insects crawling across or otherwise coming into contact with the cover. In this way, the insect can receive a controlled dusting of the pathogen powder.
  • the porosity of the cover may be selected to control the pathogen dose received.
  • the cover prevents the insects from "drowning" in the loose powder.
  • the cover may be for example a porous fabric or fine plastics gauze.
  • particles of the pathogen can be impregnated into a porous or reticulated substrate such as an open celled foam or fibrous pad.
  • the porous cover or pad may be provided as a lower side wall or bottom wall of the container. Pathogen particles may then fall out of the container under gravity, when disturbed by an insect.
  • the pathogen may be supplied as a liquid formulation, again with dosage optionally controlled by a porous cover or pad.
  • the cover or pad may be protected behind a tear-off or otherwise removable seal.
  • the seal may be, for example, a metal or plastics foil (not shown) e.g. ultrasonically welded to the rim of the container 28. Additionally or alternatively, the seal may comprise any suitable removable lid. Similar arrangements can be used to seal covers or pads exposable in the lower side wall or bottom of the container. Thus, the pathogen may be supplied to the end user pre-packaged in the container 28.
  • the trap 10 protects the pathogen 28 from the sun (e.g. UV light and excessive drying), from the weather and from wind dispersal. If a given pathogen is more effective in particular ambient conditions, the interior of the trap can be adapted accordingly. For example if a high humidity is required, a means for keeping the trap interior moist can be provided, such as by an absorbent wad or paper, connected to a wick and a water reservoir.
  • a means for keeping the trap interior moist can be provided, such as by an absorbent wad or paper, connected to a wick and a water reservoir.
  • AU three fungi mentioned above are effective as the pathogen and can be cultured by known methods to obtain spores in dry powder form.
  • Beauveria bassiana is commercially available as a technical powder from Emerald BioAgriculture Corporation (www.emeraldbio.com).
  • a spray formulation sold under the registered trade mark BOTANIGARJD is approved in several countries for use as an insecticide.
  • Other potentially suitable pathogens, with details of their formulation, commercial sources and target pest organisms, are listed in "The BioPesticide Manual: a world compendium" edited by L. G. Copping, 2 nd edition published 2001 by the British Crop Protection Council (BCPC), Alton, Hampshire, U.K.; ISBN 1 901396 29 0. This manual also contains information on various semiochemicals. Selecting pathogens from target pests can produce strains suitable for use on different local pest populations in different climates. For example, the applicants have isolated and cultured different strains of B. bassiana from codling moths in English and Spanish apple and pear orchard
  • Figure 2 shows a simplified form of trap developed by the applicants, which proved effective in contaminating codling moths with fluorescent marker powder in wind tunnel tests and in field trials.
  • the trap 100 comprises upper 112 and lower 114 slightly dished circular plates, held spaced from one another by pillars 116.
  • the pillars 116 are fonned in two halves, each half respectively moulded with the upper and lower plates 1 12, 114 and snap-engageable with the other half to hold the plates together.
  • a central hole in the upper plate 112 accommodates a basket 18 and lure 22 similar to those in Figure 1.
  • a container 128 for pathogen 34 is supported at the centre of the lower plate 114, below the basket 18.
  • the pathogen may again be a powder, optionally with a porous cover or retaining pad and seal as described above. Insects attracted by the lure 22 will fly between the upper and lower plates 112, 114 and will come into contact with the pathogen 34 in the container 128 as they fly around the lure 22, passing into and out of the pheromone plume in an attempt to locate its source. The insects may thus brush or knock against the pathogen source and become inoculated with pathogen.
  • the exposed surface of the pathogen 34 within the container 128 is sufficiently large to ensure adequate contact with the flying insects as they pass into and out of the trap 100.
  • the pathogen infectious units can be actively discharged from the source e.g. as a shower or spray, through which the insects pass.
  • Pathogen sources e.g. an actively sporulating fungus, in this case can be located on the upper 112 and/or the lower 114 plate.
  • An actively discharging pathogen source can also be used in the trap shown in Figure 1.
  • the insects can pass freely into and out of the trap 100 through the peripheral gap defined between the spaced plates 112, 114.
  • the extended upper plate 112 shields the lure 22 and pathogen 34 from the sun and weather, although perhaps to a lesser extent than the more enclosed arrangement of Figure 1.
  • the trap 100 of Figure 2 allows more unrestricted access to the pathogen source by the target insects.
  • the traps are positioned at regular intervals throughout the orchard.
  • the spacing between adjacent traps should preferably ensure that target insects can be attracted to one or another of the traps from substantially anywhere in the orchard or other crop.
  • the trap spacing should not exceed 40m and preferably should not exceed 20m.
  • the traps are positioned (e.g. suspended from lugs 36, Figures 1 and 2) at a suitable height to attract the insects concerned.
  • the traps are positioned in the upper half, preferably the upper third, of the orchard canopy. Trap positioning may also take into account other factors, such as prevailing wind direction (the lures being placed upwind of the pest population).
  • traps described are effective in attracting the target insect pest to the lure, allowing it to acquire the pathogen and allowing the pathogen-contaminated pest to return to its habitat.
  • the word "trap” as used in this specification is to be understood in this context, and not as requiring insects to be captured and permanently retained.
  • the traps and pathogen source can be modified within the scope of the claims, e.g. to suit the physical characteristics and behaviour of different insect pests.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Insects & Arthropods (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Catching Or Destruction (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé pour contrôler la présence d'insectes nuisibles dans des cultures commerciales telles que des vergers, le procédé comprenant les étapes suivantes: mise en place d'une source d'agent pathogène (34) à proximité d'un appât (22); attraction des insectes nuisibles par l'appât de sorte qu'ils deviennent porteurs de l'agent pathogène issu de la source; habilitation des insectes porteurs de l'agent pathogène à s'éloigner de l'appât en direction de la population des autres insectes nuisibles dans le verger, l'agent pathogène étant transmis à ladite population. L'invention a également pour objet des pièges (10, 100) et des sources (28, 128) destinés à contenir et à diffuser un agent pathogène vivant (34), utilisés pour mettre en oeuvre le procédé. L'appât peut comprendre un agent sémiochimique telle qu'une phéromone. Le procédé est efficace pour lutter contre l'infestation par la carpocapse des pommes et des poires (Cydia pomonella). L'agent pathogène peut être un champignon tel que Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae ou Paecilomyces fumosoroseus.
PCT/GB2005/004184 2004-10-29 2005-10-28 Contrôle biologique d'insectes nuisibles Ceased WO2006046067A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0424074.3 2004-10-29
GB0424074A GB2419531A (en) 2004-10-29 2004-10-29 Biological control of insect pests

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006046067A1 true WO2006046067A1 (fr) 2006-05-04

Family

ID=33515791

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2005/004184 Ceased WO2006046067A1 (fr) 2004-10-29 2005-10-28 Contrôle biologique d'insectes nuisibles

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2419531A (fr)
WO (1) WO2006046067A1 (fr)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ITRM20110120A1 (it) * 2011-03-15 2012-09-16 Nabawy Metwaly Metodo e dispositivo per la profilassi, il controllo e/o eradicazione di infestazioni da un agente eziologico.
US20130303574A1 (en) * 2010-10-15 2013-11-14 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Autodissemination of an Insect-Growth Regulator for Insect Management
CN104507305A (zh) * 2012-07-04 2015-04-08 In2Care控股有限公司 基于由具备粉末涂层的浮子引起的感染/污染的灭蚊器
US20150359228A1 (en) * 2014-06-12 2015-12-17 Ying Zhang Grasso Insect Biocontrol Method and Device: Attract-Infect-Release (AIR) Technology
US20160242403A1 (en) * 2010-10-15 2016-08-25 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Autodissemination of an insect-growth regulator for insect management
US9750237B1 (en) 2016-02-16 2017-09-05 Km Investors, Llc Covered liquid gravity feed ant elimination system and cover assemblies for biological insect pest control
CN107668003A (zh) * 2017-09-27 2018-02-09 安顺市平坝区银河特色种植专业合作社 一种油茶树种植用害虫诱杀装置
CN113287586A (zh) * 2021-07-05 2021-08-24 重庆海关技术中心 一种农林有害昆虫监控装置
US20240381864A1 (en) * 2023-05-17 2024-11-21 Zunyi Normal University Pest trap for tea planting

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
MY142119A (en) * 2005-05-17 2010-09-15 Malaysian Palm Oil Board A method for dissemination of entomopathogens
FR2912284B1 (fr) * 2007-02-12 2009-04-24 Sebastien Bonduelle Dispositif de lutte biologique contre les ravageurs
ES2335724B1 (es) * 2007-04-14 2011-01-03 Sanidad Agricola Econex, S.L. Trampa perfeccionada para la captura masiva del picudo rojo de la palmera (rhynchophorus ferrugineus).
CN106591153B (zh) * 2017-01-03 2019-06-25 齐鲁工业大学 一株对苹果蠹蛾高致病力的绿僵菌菌株及其应用
CN113396877A (zh) * 2021-07-20 2021-09-17 新疆林科院森林生态研究所 一种新疆地区苹果蠹蛾的防治方法
EP4531556A1 (fr) 2022-01-31 2025-04-09 Green Protecta SA Lutte contre les insectes nuisibles au moyen d'un mélange de substances attractives avec des bio-insecticides pathogènes

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1887771A (en) * 1931-05-05 1932-11-15 Don A Henderson Ant jar
EP0395954A1 (fr) * 1989-05-03 1990-11-07 Bayer Ag Boîte d'appât en matières synthétiques moulée par injection pour insectes, tels que fourmis ou petits animaux similaires
US5057315A (en) * 1989-03-15 1991-10-15 Ecoscience Laboratories, Inc. Method and device for the biological control of cockroaches
US5928634A (en) * 1995-01-09 1999-07-27 S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. Liquid insect bait
US5953854A (en) * 1996-12-13 1999-09-21 The Clorox Company Granular bait station
US20020095856A1 (en) * 2001-01-22 2002-07-25 Mcmanus Robert E. Liquid gravity feed ant elimination system and method
WO2003051112A1 (fr) * 2001-12-19 2003-06-26 Exosect Limited Dispositif de controle d'animaux nuisibles comportant un materiau biodegradable integrant un materiau pesticide

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1887771A (en) * 1931-05-05 1932-11-15 Don A Henderson Ant jar
US5057315A (en) * 1989-03-15 1991-10-15 Ecoscience Laboratories, Inc. Method and device for the biological control of cockroaches
EP0395954A1 (fr) * 1989-05-03 1990-11-07 Bayer Ag Boîte d'appât en matières synthétiques moulée par injection pour insectes, tels que fourmis ou petits animaux similaires
US5928634A (en) * 1995-01-09 1999-07-27 S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. Liquid insect bait
US5953854A (en) * 1996-12-13 1999-09-21 The Clorox Company Granular bait station
US20020095856A1 (en) * 2001-01-22 2002-07-25 Mcmanus Robert E. Liquid gravity feed ant elimination system and method
WO2003051112A1 (fr) * 2001-12-19 2003-06-26 Exosect Limited Dispositif de controle d'animaux nuisibles comportant un materiau biodegradable integrant un materiau pesticide

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160242403A1 (en) * 2010-10-15 2016-08-25 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Autodissemination of an insect-growth regulator for insect management
US20130303574A1 (en) * 2010-10-15 2013-11-14 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Autodissemination of an Insect-Growth Regulator for Insect Management
US10258027B2 (en) * 2010-10-15 2019-04-16 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Autodissemination of an insect-growth regulator for insect management
US9265247B2 (en) * 2010-10-15 2016-02-23 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Autodissemination of an insect-growth regulator for insect management
WO2012123909A1 (fr) * 2011-03-15 2012-09-20 Metwaly Nabawy Procédé et dispositif pour la prophylaxie et/ou le contrôle et/ou l'éradication d'infestations par un agent étiologique
ITRM20110120A1 (it) * 2011-03-15 2012-09-16 Nabawy Metwaly Metodo e dispositivo per la profilassi, il controllo e/o eradicazione di infestazioni da un agente eziologico.
CN104507305A (zh) * 2012-07-04 2015-04-08 In2Care控股有限公司 基于由具备粉末涂层的浮子引起的感染/污染的灭蚊器
CN104507305B (zh) * 2012-07-04 2016-12-28 In2Care控股有限公司 基于由具备粉末涂层的浮子引起的感染/污染的灭蚊器
US20150359228A1 (en) * 2014-06-12 2015-12-17 Ying Zhang Grasso Insect Biocontrol Method and Device: Attract-Infect-Release (AIR) Technology
US9750237B1 (en) 2016-02-16 2017-09-05 Km Investors, Llc Covered liquid gravity feed ant elimination system and cover assemblies for biological insect pest control
CN107668003A (zh) * 2017-09-27 2018-02-09 安顺市平坝区银河特色种植专业合作社 一种油茶树种植用害虫诱杀装置
CN113287586A (zh) * 2021-07-05 2021-08-24 重庆海关技术中心 一种农林有害昆虫监控装置
US20240381864A1 (en) * 2023-05-17 2024-11-21 Zunyi Normal University Pest trap for tea planting
US12402617B2 (en) * 2023-05-17 2025-09-02 Zunyi Normal University Pest trap for tea planting

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2419531A (en) 2006-05-03
GB0424074D0 (en) 2004-12-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Gaugler et al. An autodissemination station for the transfer of an insect growth regulator to mosquito oviposition sites
AU669727B2 (en) Pest control
Trematerra Advances in the use of pheromones for stored-product protection
US5057316A (en) Method and device for the biological control of insects
Navarro-Llopis et al. Mass trapping for fruit fly control
US5452540A (en) Autoinoculating device for contaminating insects with active agents
KR100524413B1 (ko) 파리성충 사육장치, 이를 포함하는 파리기생천적의 대량사육 시스템, 상기 파리기생천적을 포함하는 파리기생천적방사용기 및 이를 이용한 파리 방제방법
Wang et al. Dual‐treatment autodissemination station with enhanced transfer of an insect growth regulator to mosquito oviposition sites
WO2006046067A1 (fr) Contrôle biologique d'insectes nuisibles
TWI363599B (en) Apparatus for pest control and use thereof
BR102013017279A2 (pt) Armadilha de observação mata insetos para a captura massiva e controle do bicudo do algodoeiro
CA2089879A1 (fr) Methode et dispositif pour la lutte biologique contre les insectes
GB2383754A (en) Degradable pest control device
US6718689B1 (en) Insecticide packet for biting insects
US20080213329A1 (en) Method of Delivering a Biologically Active Agent
US5359807A (en) Method and apparatus for autodissemination of insect pathogens
US3224145A (en) Fly trap
Rodriguez‐Saona et al. Long‐term evaluation of field‐wide oriental beetle (C ol., S carabaeidae) mating disruption in blueberries using female‐mimic pheromone lures
KR200319123Y1 (ko) 파리성충 사육장치, 이를 포함하는 파리기생천적의 대량사육 시스템 및 상기 파리기생천적을 포함하는파리기생천적 방사용기
JP2825337B2 (ja) 害虫駆除用の誘引捕獲器
US20250338801A1 (en) Systems and methods for insect control
JP2001327237A (ja) シロアリ駆除装置およびシロアリ駆除方法
Kennedy Practical application of pheromones in regulatory pest management programs
Visser The Potato Tuber Moth, Phthorimaea Operculella (Zeller) in South Africa: Potential Control Measures in Non-refrigerated Store Environments
US4301147A (en) Dispersal of pathogenic material for pest control

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV LY MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 05798264

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1