WO2004073572A1

WO2004073572A1 - Package enclosing a single disposable absorbent article

Info

Publication number: WO2004073572A1
Application number: PCT/US2004/004236
Authority: WO
Inventors: Denise J. Nelson; Stanley R. Kellenberger; Duane L. Mcdonald; Fred R. Radwanski; Thomas Harold Roessler; Roman A. Weyenberg, Jr.
Original assignee: Kimberly Clark Worldwide Inc; Kimberly Clark Corp
Current assignee: Kimberly Clark Worldwide Inc; Kimberly Clark Corp
Priority date: 2003-02-14
Filing date: 2004-02-13
Publication date: 2004-09-02
Anticipated expiration: 2005-08-14

Abstract

A package enclosing a single disposable absorbent article. The single disposable absorbent article is in a compact configuration and situated within the package.

Description

PACKAGE ENCLOSING A SINGLE DISPOSABLE ABSORBENT ARTICLE

REFERENCE TO PRIOR APPLICATION

This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent Application No. 10/366,872, filed February 14, 2003, herby incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to a packaging of disposable absorbent articles. More particularly, the present invention relates to a package enclosing a single disposable absorbent article.

Absorbent articles such as, for example, diapers, training pants and adult incontinence garments are generally available to users in packages which include multiple articles therein. Frequently, these users often encounter situations away from home which would be satisfied with a single disposable absorbent article. As a result, users often carry single disposable absorbent articles about in purses, backpacks, briefcases and other containers until needed. Unfortunately, these containers do not always provide a hygienic environment for the disposable absorbent articles, and thus the articles can become dirty and/or damaged. Another situation arises when users are away from home and forget to pack even a single disposable absorbent article. These users typically have no alternative but to purchase multiple disposable absorbent articles in a single package. As a result, there remains a need to provide packaging suitable for enclosing a single disposable absorbent article.

SUMMARY In response to the foregoing need, the present inventors undertook intensive research and development efforts that resulted in the discovery of unique packaging suitable for enclosing a single disposable absorbent article. One version of the packaging of the present invention includes a first piece of material and a second piece of material. The first piece of material and the second piece of material are operatively associated with one another to enclose the absorbent article. The package has at least one viewing region in at least one of the pieces of material. The absorbent article has a folded configuration, an unfolded configuration, a bodyfacing surface and a garment facing surface. The garment facing surface of the absorbent article has a graphic disposed on at least a portion thereof. The absorbent article is in a folded configuration and enclosed within the package in a manner such that a least a portion of the graphic is situated in the viewing region. Additionally, the absorbent article has a ratio in the folded configuration to the unfolded configuration of no more than 0.15.

Another version of the present invention provides a package enclosing a single disposable absorbent article. The package includes a layer of material having an interior surface and an exterior surface. The layer of material has at least one viewing region and is configured to provide an interior space. The single disposable absorbent article has a folded configuration, an unfolded configuration, a bodyfacing surface and a garment facing surface. The garment facing surface of the single disposable absorbent article has a graphic disposed on at least a portion thereof. The single disposable absorbent article is in a folded configuration and situated within the interior space of the package in a manner such that at least a portion of the graphic is situated in the viewing region.

Still another version of the present invention discloses yet another package enclosing a single disposable absorbent article. The package includes a first piece of material, a second piece of material and an opening device. At least one of the pieces of material has at least one viewing region. The first piece of material and the second piece of material are operatively associated with one another to enclose the absorbent article. One of the pieces of material is more rigid than the other piece of material. The absorbent article has a folded configuration, an unfolded configuration, a bodyfacing surface and a garment facing surface. The garment facing surface has a graphic disposed on at least a portion thereof. The absorbent article is in a folded configuration and enclosed within the package in a manner such that at least a portion of the graphic is situated in the viewing region.

The foregoing and other features and aspects of the present invention and the manner of attaining them will become more apparent, and the invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings, where:

FIG. 1 illustrates a plan view of one version of a disposable absorbent article in an unfolded, flat-out, uncontracted state (i.e., with all elastic induced gathering and contraction removed), with the garment facing surface of the article facing the viewer and with portions of the article partially cut away to illustrate underlying features;

FIG. 2 illustrates a perspective view of a disposable absorbent article in a fastened configuration, generally similar to the configuration of the disposable absorbent article when it is fastened about a lower torso of a wearer; FIG. 3 illustrates a plan view of a disposable absorbent article in which each side is folded over the center;

FIG. 4 illustrates a perspective view of the disposable absorbent article of FIG. 3 folded into a bifolded configuration; FIG. 5 illustrates a perspective view of the disposable absorbent article of FIG. 3 folded into a trifolded configuration;

FIG. 6 illustrates a perspective view of the disposable absorbent article of FIG. 4 folded into a quadrifolded configuration;

FIG. 7 illustrates a perspective view of the disposable absorbent article of FIG. 4 having each end folded over a center to provide generally an "S" configuration;

FIG. 8 illustrates a perspective view of the absorbent article of FIG. 4 which has each end folded inward to provide generally a "Pretzel" configuration;

FIG. 9 illustrates a perspective view of the disposable absorbent article of FIG. 3 which has been rolled into a generally cylindrical configuration; FIG. 10 illustrates an apparatus for packaging disposable absorbent articles;

FIGs. 11A-11C illustrate different versions of packages in which disposable absorbent articles may be packaged;

FIG. 12 illustrates a partially folded disposable absorbent article having a graphic situated on at least a portion of the outer cover; FIGs. 13A-13C illustrate different versions of packages having at least one viewing region;

FIG. 14 illustrates a version of a package formed from a first piece of material and a second piece of material;

FIG. 15 illustrates a version of a package formed from a layer or sheet of material; and FIG. 16 illustrates another version of a package formed from a first piece of material and a second piece of material.

DESCRIPTION

The unfolded configuration or footprint is intended to refer to a disposable absorbent article, such as a diaper, positioned in an unfolded, flat-out, uncontracted state (i.e. , with all elastic induced gathering and contraction removed), as illustrated in FIG. 1. Similarly, a pant- type disposable absorbent article, such as a training pant or an adult incontinence pant or garment is positioned by first cutting the article from each leg opening to the waist opening on each side (if the pant/garment is not provided with pre-existing openings in these areas), and positioning the article in the unfolded and laid flat position described above. The folded configuration or footprint is intended to refer to a disposable absorbent article, such as a diaper, positioned in its folded position. Additional details of both configurations or footprints will be discussed below.

Although described herein primarily in the context of an infant diaper, one of skill in the art will readily appreciate upon reading this description that the present invention is also suitable for other disposable absorbent articles such as children's training pants and adult incontinence garments. An example of a disposable absorbent article, as illustrated in FIG. 1, is a diaper 20.

Turning now to FIG. 1, the diaper 20 is illustrated in an unfastened, laid flat with unretracted elastics and extended to ungathered length configuration with the surface of the diaper 20 (adapted to contact the wearer's garment) facing the viewer and with portions of the diaper 20 partially cut away to illustrate the underlying features. The illustrated diaper 20 defines a front waist region 22, a back waist region 24, a crotch region 26 that extends between and connects the front and back waist regions 22 and 24, a longitudinal direction or length dimension 38 and a lateral direction or width dimension 40. As used herein, the term "longitudinal direction" means the direction that is parallel to the length dimension (usually machine direction) of the diaper 20 and generally runs parallel to the longitudinal centerline or "y" axis of the diaper 20. As used herein the term "later al direction" means the direction that coincides with the width direction which generally is perpendicular to the longitudinal or machine direction of the diaper 20 and generally runs parallel to the lateral centerline or " x" axis of the diaper 20. Measurements of the area immediately within the outer perimeter or periphery 46 of the diaper 20 along the longitudinal direction 38 and the lateral direction -10 provide the area (Table 1) for the unfolded configuration or footprint of the diaper 20. The method of measurement is discussed below in Example IA. The front waist region 22 includes the portion of the diaper 20 which, when worn, is positioned on the front of the wearer. The front waist region 22 further defines front ear regions 72 generally in the laterally outward portions of the front waist region 22. The back waist region 24 comprises the portion of the diaper 20 which, when worn, is positioned on tire back of the wearer. The back waist region 24 further includes back ear portions 70. When the diaper 20 is worn, back ear portions 70 are usually overlapped over front ear regions 72, as illustrated in FIG. 2. The crotch region 26 of the diaper 20 includes the portion of the diaper 20 which, when worn, is positioned between the legs of the wearer and covers the lower torso of the wearer.

The diaper 20 defines a pair of longitudinal side edges 30, a pair of lateral waist edges 32, an interior or bodyfacing surface 34 (facing away from the viewer) which is configured to contact the wearer, and an exterior or garment facing surface 36, opposite the interior surface 34, which is configured to contact the wearer's clothing in use. The illustrated diaper 20 also includes an outer cover 42 and a bodyside liner 44 which is connected to the outer cover 42 in a superposed relationship and an absorbent core 28. The absorbent core 28 is located between the outer cover 42 and the bodyside liner 44. The longitudinal side edges 30 of the diaper 20 are generally defined by the side edges 30 of the outer cover 42 which further define leg openings that are formed when the article is worn and may be curvilinear. The lateral waist edges 32 of the diaper 20 are generally defined by the waist edges 32 of the outer cover 42 and define a waist opening which is configured to encircle the waist of the wearer when worn. The absorbent core 28 is configured to contain and/or absorb bodily exudates discharged from the wearer. The diaper 20 may further include leg elastics 54, containment flaps (not illustrated) and waist elastics 58 as are known to those skilled in the art. It should be recognized that individual components of the diaper 20 may be optional depending upon the intended use of the diaper 20.

The diaper 20 may be of various suitable shapes. For example, in the unfastened configuration as illustrated in FIG. 1, tire diaper 20 may have an overall rectangular shape, T-shape or a generally I-shape. In the configuration illustrated in FIG. 1, the diaper 20 has an approximately hourglass shape in an unfastened configuration.

The bodyside liner 44 suitably presents a bodyfacing surface which is compliant, soft feeling, and nonirritating to the wearer's skin. Further, the bodyside liner 44 may be less hydrophilic than the absorbent core 28, to present a relatively dry surface to the wearer and to isolate the wearer's skin from liquids held in the a bsorbent core 28.

The absorbent core 28 of the diaper 20, as representatively illustrated in FIG. 1, may suitably include a matrix of hydrophilic fibers, such as a web of cellulosic fluff, mixed with particles of a high-absorbency material commonly known as superabsorbent material (SAPs); in a particular aspect, the absorbent core 28 includes a matrix of cellulosic fluff such as wood pulp fluff and superabsorbent hydrogel-forming particles, namely, SAPs. The wood pulp fluff may be exchanged with synthetic, polymeric, meltblown fibers or with a combination of meltblown fibers and natural fibers. The SAPs may be substantially homogeneously mixed with the hydrophilic fibers or may be nonuniformly mixed. The fluff and SAPs may also be selectively placed into desired zones of the absorbent core 28 to better contain and absorb bodily exudates. The concentration of the SAPs may also vary through the thickness of the absorbent core 28. Alternatively, the absorbent core 28 may include a laminate of fibrous webs and SAPs or other suitable means of maintaining SAPs in a localized area.

The absorbent core 28 may have any of a number of shapes. For example, the absorbent core 28 may be rectangular, I-shaped (including an hour glass shape, or a shape which is expanded outward at one or both ends), T-shaped, and so forth. It is generally desired that the absorbent core 28 be narrow in the crotch region 26 of the diaper 20. The size and the absorbent capacity of the absorbent core 28 should be compatible with the size of the intended wearer and the liquid loading imparted by the intended use of the absorbent article. The high absorbency material or particles, i.e. , SAPs, may be in any of a wide variety of geometric forms. In general, it is desired that the high absorbency material be in the form of discrete particles, SAPs, which may take any of a number of shapes. The SAPs are generally present in the absorbent core 28 in an amount of from about 5 to about 90 weight percent based on total weight of the absorbent core 28. Desirably, the SAPs are present in the absorbent core 28 in an amount of from about 20 to about 90 weight percent based on the total weight of the absorbent core 28. More desirably, the SAPs are present in the absorbent core 28 in an amount of from about 30 to about 90 weight percent based on the total weight of the absorbent core 28. Yet even more desirably, the SAPs are present in the absorbent core 28 in an amount of from about 40 to about 90 weight percent based on the total weight of the absorbent core 28. SAPs are well known to those skilled in the art and are commercially available from a number of suppliers, including The Dow Chemical Co., BASF, and Stockhausen, Inc.

A fastening system helps maintain the initial fastened position of the diaper 20 during use so as to maintain proper tension and ultimately proper fit. As illustrated in FIGs. 1 and 2, the diaper 20 includes the back ear portion 70, which has fasteners 60. The fasteners 60 may include an attachment portion 66, such as an adhesive, desirably a pressure sensitive adhesive. Alternatively, the attachment portion 66 may include a hook material, and so forth. The front waist region 22 includes a landing zone 80. If the attachment portion 66 of the fastener 60 is an adhesive, the landing zone desirably includes a material configured to receive and hold an adhesive fastener thereto. Alternatively, if the attachment portion 66 of the fastener 60 is a hook material, the landing zone desirably includes a loop material for releasably coupling the hook material thereto. In use, the caregiver overlaps each back ear portion 70 and fastener 60 over the front waist region 22 and engages the fasteners 60 to the landing zone 80, as illustrated in FIG. 2, creating an overlap region 104 which holds the diaper 20 in position about a torso.

Turning now to folding configurations or "footp rints", a disposable absorbent article, that is, for purposes of illustration only and not by way of limitation, the diaper 20 illustrated in FIGs. 1 and 2, is folded to provide a reduced or more compact configuration or footprint. The various compact footprints, created by different folding techniques, are compared to the unfolded footprint, that is, the measurement of the area as defined immediately within the outer perimeter or periphery 46 of the diaper 20, as described in detail in Example IA, and the results are provided in Table 1. Each folded compact configuration of each article, namely, the diaper 20 described below and illustrated in FIGs. 4 through 9 is measured along a longitudinal direction or length dimension 138 (generally along a line running parallel to the y axis) and a lateral direction or width dimension 140 (generally along a line running parallel to the x axis). In addition, a depth dimension 142 (generally along a line running parallel to the z axis; the z axis residing in a plane oriented perpendicular to the x and y axes) is measured in both the unfolded footprint of the diaper 20, and the folded footprint. The description of the measurement of the depth dimension will be described in the Examples, below. Therefore, area and volume calculations of each folded article compared to the unfolded article are provided in Table 1. In initially folding a disposable absorbent article such as, by way of non-limiting example, a diaper 20, each side 148 is optionally folded inward, including the back ear portions 70 and the front ear regions 72, over the area containing the absorbent core 28, as illustrated in FIG. 3. The diaper 20 is folded at approximately the center 144 to provide a bifolded diaper 20 having two overlapping panels 150 of approximately equal length, as illustrated in FIG. 4. In an alternative, as illustrated in FIG. 5, the diaper 20, folded initially as illustrated in

FIG. 3 is folded such that each end 152 is folded over and overlaps about a third of the other to provide three approximately equal and overlapping panels 150. In this manner, a trifolded diaper 20 is provided.

In another alternative, as illustrated in FIG. 6, the bifolded diaper 20 of FIG. 4 is then overlapped again to provide a quadrifolded diaper 20 having four approximately equal and overlapping panels 150.

In yet another alternative, as illustrated in FIG. 7, the bifolded diaper 20 of FIG. 4 is then folded such that approximately one diird of each bifolded end 154 of the folded diaper is folded over each side of a center portion to provide an "S" folded diaper having six approximately equal and overlapping panels 150.

In still yet another alternative, as illustrated in FIG. 8, each end 154 of the bifolded diaper 20 of FIG. 4 is overlapped inwardly, toward a center portion 156 to provide a "Pr etzel" fold having eight overlapping panels 150.

In still a further embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 9, the diaper 20 of FIG. 3 is rolled from one end to the other to form a generally cylindrical shape. This configuration, providing a continuous rotation of the diaper 20 around a center, differs from folds; it has no planar surface in the folded configuration, other than each end, since it forms, generally, a cylindrical shape. It will be understood, however, that the present article may be folded in any manner consistent with the present invention, and the foregoing folding techniques and rolled technique are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

In folding the article, folding the fasteners 60 is typically taken into consideration. Fasteners 60 desirably are not folded in the width 40 (cross-machine) direction, because such folding impacts the ability of the attachment portions 66 to fasten to the landing zone 80. Damage to the attachment portions 66 may occur if the fastener 60 is bent such that a portion of the fastener 60 lies in one plane while another portion lies in a curve and/or another plane. Specifically, the attachment portions 66 may be damaged such that they are not capable of maintaining a sufficient contact with the landing zone 80, thereby causing the article to unfasten from a torso. Therefore, the fasteners 60 are desirably maintained in a consistent plane or planar surface when folded with the article in any of the foregoing folded configurations so that the fastener 60 and attachment portion 66 thereof is lying substantially within the same plane.

The article may be folded by hand or by machine (not illustrated). The article is then packaged. Illustrated in FIG. 10 is one method and apparatus 157 of packaging an article. In this example, a first reel 158 has sheet material 159 which is rotatably supported on a bed 160 having a vacuum cavity former 162 provided where the article is disposed. Articles, such as, for example, the diaper 20 folded as illustrated in FIG. 7, are provided at a loading station 164 and they are disposed on the sheet material 159 over the cavity former 162. The articles are carried to a packaging station 165 which has a vacuum chamber (not illustrated). The packaging station 165 also contains film (not illustrated) and a sealing apparatus (not illustrated) for sealing the articles in the cavities while they are in the vacuum chamber. The articles in the forming cavities 162 are carried into the packaging station 165 and the chamber is closed. A vacuum is applied to the articles and the cavities 162, and film is then positioned and sealed over each cavity via sealing devices, such as thermal sealing, ultrasonic bonding, or any other sealing methods known by those skilled in the art. The vacuum depressurizes the chamber in the packaging station to a pressure which is less than the atmospheric pressure outside of the chamber. After the package is sealed, the vacuum is removed from the chamber, and the chamber and the article sealed in the package are permitted to return to regular atmospheric pressure, which results in compression of the article in the package, providing a soft package (form-fill-seal) which is formed about the article. The packaged article 190 may thereafter be removed (not illustrated). It will be appreciated that many techniques and apparatus for vacuum packaging are known to those skilled in the art, and are commercially available. A variety of packaging devices may be utilized. The amount of vacuum is typically an amount necessary to result in compression of the article so that it may be contained and reduced in size within and along with the package. The amount of vacuum suitable for use in packages of the present invention is generally no more than 32; alternatively, no more than 31; alternatively, no more than 30; alternatively, no more than 29; alternatively, no more than 28; alternatively, no more than 27; alternatively, no more than 26; alternatively, no more than 25; alternatively, no more than 20; alternatively, no more than 15; alternatively, no more than 14; alternatively, no more than 13; alternatively, no more than 12; alternatively, no more than 11; alternatively, no more than 10; alternatively, no more than 9; alternatively, no more than 8; alternatively, no more than 7; and finally, alternatively, no more than 6 inches of Mercury. The amount of vacuum suitable for use in packages of the present invention is generally no less than 5; alternatively, no less than 6; alternatively, no less than 7 alternatively, no less than 8 alternatively, no less than 9; alternatively, no less than 10 alternatively, no less than 11 alternatively, no less than 12 alternatively, no less than 13 alternatively, no less than 14 alternatively, no less than 15 alternatively, no less than 17 alternatively, no less than 23 alternatively, no less than 25 alternatively, no less than 26 alternatively, no less than 27 alternatively, no less than 28 alternatively, no less than 29 alternatively, no less than 30 and finally, alternatively, no less than 31 inches of Mercury Thus, the amount of vacuum may be no less than 5 up to no more than 32 inches of Mercury although the approximate amount of vacuum may vary according to, inter alia, the general design and intended use of the package.

The disposable absorbent article is sealed in a package desirably constructed of a material with a substantially low gas permeability, including, but not limited to, a polymeric film, such as, by way of non-limiting example, a polyethylene terephthalate (PET), a polyvinyldichloride (PVDC), having an oxygen transmission of about less than 3.0 cc/100 in²/24 hours at 73 °F and 0 % relative humidity (RH). Multilayer films, each providing a different function, may be utilized. For example, one layer may have a heat sealable property, such as polypropylene or polyethylene, another layer may provide strength, such as polyester and/or nylon, and another layer may provide substantially reduced gas permeability, such as PET or PVDC. Also, films with reduced permeability to vapors (that is, films that have substantially low gas permeability or are substantially gas impermeable for a variety of applications) can themselves be composites, such as where one layer is a flexible polymer, such as polyurethane, polyethylene, ether polyurethane, or polypropylene, while another layer is coated on or coextruded and serves as a barrier layer. Barrier layers can generally be viewed as substantially organic based or substantially inorganic based. However, it will be appreciated that a variety of materials having substantially low gas permeability or substantially gas impermeable material(s) known in the art may be suitable for use in the present invention.

Desirably, with a substantially low gas permeable material and/or package, the gas permeability rate is no more than 5; alternatively, no more than 4; alternatively, no more than 3; alternatively, no more than 2; alternatively, no more than 1; alternatively, no more than 0.5; and finally, alternatively, no more than 0.1 cc/100 in²/24 hours. The gas permeability rate is no less than 0.05; alternatively, no less than 0.1; alternatively, no less than 0.5; alternatively, no less than 1; alternatively, no less than 2; alternatively, no less than 3; alternatively, no less than 4; and finally, alternatively, no less than 4.5 cc/100 in²/24 hours. Thus, the gas permeability rate may be no less than 0.05 up to no more than 5 cc/100 in²/24 hours; although the approximate gas permeability rate may vary according to, inter alia, the general design and intended use of the package.

A number of different packages may be utilized which are suitable for use with the present invention. Types of packages which are particularly suitable include, but are not limited to form-fill-seal packages, blister packages, injection molded packages (with and without living hinges), heat sealed pouches, thermally formed trays with lids, and a variety of other packages known to those skilled in the art.

Before a disposable absorbent article is packaged, and while a disposable absorbent article is being packaged, it is desirable to maintain a low moisture level. High moisture levels may result in hydrogen bonding in the absorbent core of the article. Therefore, a disposable absorbent article is desirably packaged and maintained with an absorbent core at a moisture level of no more than 10; alternatively, no more than 9; alternatively, no more than 8; alternatively, no more than 7; alternatively, no more than 6; alternatively, no more than 5; alternatively no more than 4 alternatively, no more than 3; alternatively, no more than 2; and finally, alternatively, no more than 1 percent. A disposable absorbent article is desirably packaged and maintained with an absorbent core at a moisture level of no less than 0.5; alternatively, no less than 1 alternatively, no less than 2; alternatively, no less than 3; alternatively, no less than 4 alternatively, no less than 5; alternatively, no less than 6; alternatively, no less than 7 alternatively, no less than 8; and finally, alternatively, no less 9 percent. Thus, a disposable absorbent article is desirably packaged and maintained with an absorbent core at a moisture level ranging between no less than 0.5 up to no more than 10 percent; although the approximate ^• moisture level may vary according to, inter alia, the general design and intended use of the package. In addition, it is advantageous to control heat during folding and packaging the disposable absorbent article. The temperature of at least the absorbent core is desirably kept below about 110 °C. Even more desirably, the temperature of at least the absorbent core is kept below about 80 °C. Yet even more desirably, the temperature of at least the absorbent core is kept below about 50 °C. Still even more desirably, the temperature of at least the absorbent core is kept below about 24 °C.

FIGs. 11A-11C illustrate several different packaged compact absorbent articles 190. Package 192A illustrates a form-fill-seal package holding a compact absorbent article 190A (such as, for example, the article illustrated in FIG. 7), as also generally illustrated in FIG. 10. Package 192B, as illustrated in FIG. 11B, is a blister package having a living hinge and holding a compact absorbent article 190B (such as the article illustrated in FIG. 9). FIG. 11C illustrates an injection molded package having a living hinge (not illustrated) which holds a compact absorbent article 190C. The packages 190A-190C may include curvilinear corners, and/or desirably provide size information (FIG. 11 A) for the compact absorbent article contained therein, as well as one or more attractive decorations, such as one or more letters, numbers, symbols, designs and/or patterns, an area to write a user's name and other information, and so forth. In addition, a wet sheet packet, a lotion packet, a changing sheet, a disposal bag, one or more coupons, and so forth may also be included on an inside of the package, as illustrated in 190C, or on an outside of the package (not illustrated). Desirably, each package 190A-190C will open without any small pieces of the package tearing away separately, which is undesirable in the presence of small children and infants.

As illustrated in FIG. IIA, the package 192A may have an opening device 194 such as, for example, a pull tab. The pull tab desirably extends beyond a perimeter 196 of the package 192A, so that it is easy to grasp between a thumb and a finger by a caregiver, and permits easy opening of the package while maintaining the package 192 in one piece after being opened, and after the article has been removed.

The pull tab illustrated in FIG. IIA may be formed as a portion of the top material 197 of the package 192A, and optionally is not coterminus with the bottom material 198 of the package 192A to which the top material 192 is sealed. The pull tab may have pull indicia such as words, symbols, and so forth (for example, but not by way of limitation, "Pull Here" illustrated in FIG. IIA). The pull tab may be formed of a thicker material, or may be embossed or otherwise textured, and so forth, to provide easy grasping and pulling by a caregiver. The pull tab may be formed in one or more corners of the package 192A, or one or more pull tabs may be provided on any portion(s) of the package 192A (not illustrated). Desirably, the edges of the pull tab are curvilinear.

In one suitable version of the present invention, similar to that illustrated in FIG. 15, a package 200 is formed from a layer or sheet of material having an interior surface (not shown) and an opposing exterior surface 206. The sheet of material is configured to provide an interior space. The sheet of material also has at least one viewing region 208. The package 200 so formed is well suited to enclose a disposable absorbent article 20. The disposable absorbent article 20 has a folded configuration, an unfolded configuration, a bodyfacing surface and a garment facing surface. Disposed on at least a portion of the garment facing surface of the disposable absorbent article 20 is a graphic 210. The disposable absorbent article 20 is in a compact configuration and situated within the interior space of the package 200 in a manner such that at least a portion of the graphic 210 is in the viewing region 208.

In another suitable version of the present invention, representatively illustrated in FIGs. 13A, 14 and 16, a package 200 is formed from a first piece of material 220 that is operatively associated with a second piece of material 222. (As illustrated in FIG. 14, a corner of the second piece of material 222 is turned up as it may be while being opened by a consumer.) The package 200 so formed is well suited to enclose a disposable absorbent article 20. At least one of the pieces of material is typically more rigid than the other piece of material. Moreover, at least one of the pieces of material has at least one viewing region 208. The disposable absorbent article 20 has a folded configuration, an unfolded configuration, a bodyfacing surface and a garment facing surface. Disposed on at least a portion of the garment facing surface of the disposable absorbent article is a graphic 210. The disposable absorbent article 20 is in a folded configuration and situated within the package 200 in a manner such that at least a portion of the graphic 210 is in the viewing region 208. In an optional configuration, as illustrated in FIGs 13A and 14, the first piece of material 220 is configured to have a depth and the second piece of material 222 is configured as a lid.

The difference in rigidity between the two pieces of material may result from the same type of material being used for both pieces of material, but one piece of material being thicker or thinner than the other piece of material. One of skill in the art will also appreciate that the difference in rigidity may be obtained by a variety of other means such as by using two different materials of the same or similar thickness. The differences in rigidity can be determined by a variety of techniques known to those of skill in the art, including determining the Gurley stiffness of each piece of material. A suitable technique for determining Gurley stiffness is set forth in TAPPI T543 PM-84. The viewing region 208 may be in a variety of shapes such as droplets, circles, parallelepipeds, or the like. Specifically, the viewing region 208 may be situated in a variety of locations on the package 200 and may be either transparent or translucent. A possible viewing region 208 can result from a blend of polymer with no added pigment. The viewing region 208 described herein can be the entire package or a portion of the package. Moreover, it will be readily appreciated that the packages of the present invention may have situated thereon more than one viewing region.

The term "grap hic" is intended to refer to written, printed, drawn or engraved characters, figures, objects, letters and/or words, numbers, and the like, including, but not limited to permanent graphics, active graphics, and the like. The term "permanent graphic" is intended to refer to a graphic that does not substantially change its degree of visibility when the disposable absorbent article is insulted with urine and when the disposable absorbent article is exposed to the environment, in simulated use conditions. The term "active graphic" is intended to refer to an appearing graphic, a fading graphic, or a combination of appearing and fading graphics. The term "app earing graphic" is intended to refer to a graphic that becomes visible or becomes significantly more visible when exposed to urine, or that becomes visible or becomes significantly more visible with the passage of time when exposed to the environment, but not exposed to urine. Conversely, the term "fading graphic" is intended to refer to a graphic that becomes invisible or significantly less visible when exposed to urine, or that becomes invisible or significantly less visible with the passage of time when exposed to the environment, but not exposed to urine. "Gra phic" and other graphic-related terms are described in greater detail in U.S. Patent No. 6,297,424, issued to Olson et al., the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference to the extent that it does not conflict with the present description.

As used herein, the term "ope ratively associated" is intended to refer to: configurations in which at least a portion of a first piece of material is directly joined to at least a portion of a second piece of material; configurations wherein at least a portion of a first piece of material is indirectly joined to at least a portion of a second piece of material by affixing at least a portion of tire first piece of material to intermediate elements or members which in turn are affixed to at least a portion of the second piece of material; configurations in which at least a portion of a single piece of material is directly joined to at least another portion, of the single piece of material; and configurations wherein at least a portion of a single piece of material is indirectly joined to at least another portion of the single piece of material via intermediate elements or members. At least a portion of the operatively associated material(s) is configured to allow a consumer to separate the material(s) to an extent sufficient to allow the consumer to remove the disposable absorbent article from its package.

Desirably, the absorbent article 20, when packaged, will have a configuration that permits it to be placed in a purse, a jacket pocket, a pants pocket, or a shirt pocket. Each type of pocket has somewhat different dimensions, but generally, it is desirable to have an article 20, for example, a single packaged diaper, which has a width dimension of less than 6 inches, a length dimension of less than 11 inches, and a depth dimension of less than 1.75 inches. More desirably, the article 20 will have a width dimension 138 of less than 5 inches, a length dimension 140 of less than 5.5 inches, and a depth dimension of less than 1.5 inches. Even more desirably, the article 20 will have a width dimension of less than 4.6 inches, a length dimension of less than 4.0 inches, and a depth dimension of less than 1.75 inches. Yet even more desirably, the article 20 will have a width dimension of less than 4.6 inches, a length dimension of less than 3.8 inches, and a depth dimension of less than 1.3 inches. Such ranges described herein provide a footprint, that is, an area, or projected area, as well as a volume for the packaged absorbent article 20 so that it easily fits into a shirt pocket, a pants pocket, a jacket pocket, a small purse, and so forth, to provide ease in carrying and concealing the article 20.

In addition it may be desired that the package enclosing the single disposable absorbent article have a tiiickness or depth dimension of no more than 6.35 mm. Such a thickness or depth dimension would render the package enclosing the single disposable absorbent article suitable for receiving a favorable postage rate when deposited with the United States Postal Service.

The area or footprint of the folded absorbent article is compared to the unfolded and laid flat with unretracted elastics and extended to ungathered length configuration of the article (as exemplified by the disposable diaper (20), as provided in Table 1. Table 1 provides the area for the unfolded and laid flat article positioned as described above, as well as the area for each different type of folded absorbent article. Desirably, the ratio between the folded configuration and the unfolded configuration is no more than 0.15; alternatively, no more titan 0.14; alternatively, no more than 0.13; alternatively, no more than 0.12; alternatively, no more than 0.11; alternatively, no more than 0.10; alternatively, no more than 0.09; alternatively, no more than 0.08; alternatively, no more than 0.07; alternatively, no more than 0.06; and finally, alternatively, no more than 0.05. Desirably, the ratio between the folded configuration and the unfolded configuration is no less than 0.04; alternatively, no less than 0.05; alternatively, no less than 0.06; alternatively, no less than 0.07; alternatively, no less than 0.08; alternatively, no less than 0.09; alternatively, no less than 0.10; alternatively, no less than 0.11; alternatively, no less than 0.12; alternatively, no less than 0.13; and finally, alternatively, no less than 0.14. Thus, the ratio between the folded and unfolded configuration of a disposable absorbent article typically is no less than 0.04 and no more than 0.15; although the approximate ratio may vary according to, inter alia, the general design and intended use of the disposable absorbent article.

When a disposable absorbent article is packaged, it is anticipated that its size will be reduced in at least two dimensions. As measured in two dimensions, i.e., width and length (area = inches²), and compared against a substantially similarly folded un-packaged article (e.g. , Examples 1 and 4D), the disposable absorbent article is desirably reduced in area by no less than 5; alternatively, no less than 6; alternatively, no less than 7; alternatively, no less than 8 alternatively, no less than 9; alternatively, no less than 10; alternatively, no less than 11 alternatively, no less than 12; alternatively, no less than 13; alternatively, no less than 14 alternatively, no less than 15; alternatively, no less than 17; alternatively, no less than 20 alternatively, no less than 21; alternatively, no less than 22; alternatively, no less than 23; and finally, alternatively, no less than 24 percent. The disposable absorbent article is desirably reduced in area by no more than 25; alternatively, no more than 24; alternatively, no more than 23; alternatively, no more than 22; alternatively, no more than 21; alternatively, no more tlian 20; alternatively, no more than 18; alternatively, no more than 15; alternatively, no more than 13; alternatively, no more tlian 10; alternatively, no more than 9; alternatively, no more than 8; alternatively, no more than 7; and finally, alternatively, no more than 6 percent. Thus, the disposable absorbent article is desirably reduced in area in an amount ranging between no less tlian 5 up to no more than 25 percent; although the approximate reduction in area may vary according to, inter alia, the general design and intended use of the disposable absorbent article.

When the disposable absorbent article is packaged and measured in three dimensions, i.e. , width, length and depth (volume = inches³), and compared against a substantially similarly folded un-packaged disposable absorbent article (e.g. , Examples 1 and 4D), the disposable absorbent article is desirably reduced in volume by no less than 10; alternatively, no less than 15; alternatively, no less than 20; alternatively, no less than 25; alternatively, no less than 30; alternatively, no less than 35; and finally, alternatively, no less than 40 percent. The disposable absorbent article is desirably reduced in volume by no more tiian 45; alternatively, no more than 40; alternatively, no more than 35; alternatively, no more than 30; alternatively, no more than 25; alternatively, no more than 20; and finally, alternatively, no more than 15 percent. Thus, the disposable absorbent article is desirably reduced in volume in an amount ranging between no less than 10 up to no more than 45 percent; although the approximate reduction in volume may vary according to, inter alia, the general design and intended use of the disposable absorbent article. The volume of the compact absorbent article is desirably no more than 30; alternatively, no more than 29; alternatively, no more than 28; alternatively, no more tiian 27; alternatively, no more than 26; alternatively, no more than 25; alternatively, no more than 23; alternatively, no more than 20; alternatively, no more than 17; alternatively, no more tlian 15; alternatively, no more than 13; alternatively, no more than 10; alternatively, no more than 9; alternatively, no more than 8; alternatively, no more than 7; and finally, alternatively, no more than 6 in³. The volume of the compact absorbent article is desirably no less than 5; alternatively, no less than 6 alternatively, no less than 7; alternatively, no less than 8; alternatively, no less than 9 alternatively, no less than 10; alternatively, no less than 12; alternatively, no less than 18 alternatively, no less than 22; alternatively, no less than 25; alternatively, no less than 26 alternatively, no less than 27; alternatively, no less than 28; and finally, alternatively, no less than 29 in³. Thus, tire volume of the compact disposable absorbent article typically is no less than 5 and no more than 30 in³; although the approximate volume of tire compact disposable absorbent article may vary according to, inter alia, the general design and intended use of the disposable absorbent article.

EXAMPLES The following Examples describe various versions of the invention. Other versions within the scope of the claims herein will be apparent to one skilled in the art from consideration of the specification or practice of the invention as disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification, together with the Examples, be considered exemplary only, with the scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the claims which follow the Examples.

Example 1 A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^® Step 3 diaper, available from Kimberly-Clark

Corporation, Neenah, Wisconsin) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was configured to fit an infant weighing about 16 to about 28 pounds. The diaper was folded by hand as illustrated in FIG. 7 and described previously in detail herein, in the "S" fold configuration, and positioned in a cavity formed from a material, namely, 611K--3 mil nylon with LLDPE coextmsion, available from Curwood, New London, Wisconsin, having at least one layer of a substantially low gas permeability or one layer of a substantially gas impermeable material, which was formed and positioned in a horizontal form/fill/seal packaging machine, in this instance, a RapidPak RP-55, manufactured by Alkar- Rapidpak, Inc., Lodi, Wisconsin. The top material, that is, the sealing cover, also having at least one substantially gas impermeable layer, was a 48 gauge polyester film with 2 mils HDPE peel seal (coextrusion), available from Curwood, New London, Wisconsin. The top material was provided as a "pe el back" material for a caregiver's convenience, and it was thermally sealed over the cavity while the cavity with the folded diaper therein was positioned in the vacuum chamber and a vacuum pressure in a range of about 20 to about 25 inches of Mercury relative to the existing atmospheric pressure was removed from the chamber. The chamber was then returned to existing atmospheric pressure, which resulted in compression of the package and the folded absorbent article therein. The packaged article was then removed from the chamber.

The dimensions of the S-folded diaper in its package were then compared to the unfolded dimensions of the Step 3 diaper disclosed in Example 4, which was measured as described in detail in Example IA. The dimensions of the S-folded diaper in its package were then measured. The width was 4.250 inches and the length was 2.500 inches. The area of the perimeter or "footp rint" was 10.625 inches². The depth was 0.750 inches. The volume was 7.969 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of tire S folded vacuum packaged diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.06. The measurement did not include any portion of the package which extended beyond the perimeter of the diaper, but only the diaper contained within. As compared to the S folded but un-packaged diaper of Example 4D, the present vacuum packaging diaper only had about 78 percent of the area of the unpackaged S folded diaper of Example 4D (an about 22 percent reduction in area), and only had about 55 percent of the volume of the unpackaged S folded diaper of Example 4D (an about 45 percent reduction in volume).

TABLE 1. Diaper Dimensions

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Dimensions Area Volume Ratio*

PREEMIE (in.) (in.²) (in.³)

Width Length Depth

Flat/Unfolded 99.59

Bifold (Example 1A) 3.750 5.750 0.329 21.56 7.094 0.217

Trifold (Example IB) 3.750 3.875 0.494 14.53 7.178 0.146

Quadrifold (Example IC) 3.750 2.873 0.658 10.78 7.094 0.108

S-Fold (Example ID) 3.750 2.000 0.988 7.50 7.410 0.075

Pretzel Fold (Example IE) 3.750 1.500 1.317 5.63 7.408 0.056

*Folded to Unfolded Area

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Dimensions Area Volume Ratio*

STEP 1 (in.) . (in.²) (in.³)

Width Length Depth

Flat/Unfolded 128.61

Bifold (Example 2A) 4.000 6.625 0.343 26.50 9.100 0.206

Trifold (Example 2B) 4.000 4.375 0.514 17.50 9.000 0.136

Quadrifold (Example 2C) 4.000 3.625 0.686 14.50 9.950 0.113

S-Fold (Example 2D) 4.000 2.500 1.028 10.00 10.280 0.078

Pretzel Fold (Example 2E) 4.000 1.750 1.317 7.00 9.219 0.054

*Folded to Unfolded Area

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Dimensions Area Volume Ratio*

STEP 2 (in.) (in.²) (in.³)

Width Length Depth

Flat/Unfolded 153.36

Bifold (Example 3A) 4.125 7.500 0.350 30.94 10.828 0.202

Trifold (Example 3B) 4.125 4.875 0.525 20.11 10.557 0.131

Quadrifold (Example 3C) 4.125 3.875 0.700 15.94 11.189 0.104

S-Fold (Example 3D) 4.125 2.750 1.050 11.34 11.910 0.074

Pretzel Fold (Example 3E) 4.125 1.875 1.400 7.73 10.828 0.050

*Folded to Unfolded Area

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Dimensions Area Volume Ratio*

STEP 3 (in.) (in.²) (in.³)

Width Length Depth

Flat/Unfolded 172.6

Bifold (Example 4A) 4.500 8.250 0.354 37.13 13.142 0.215

Trifold (Example 4B) 4.500 5.375 0.531 24.19 12.844 0.140

Quadrifold (Example 4C) 4.500 4.000 0.708 18.00 12.744 0.104

S-Fold (Example 4D) 4.500 3.000 1.063 13.50 14.351 0.078

Pretzel Fold (Example 4E) 4.500 1.875 1.417 8.44 11.956 0.049

*Folded to Unfolded Area

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Dimensions Area Volume Ratio* STEP 4 (in.) (in.²) (in.³)

Width Length Depth

Flat/Unfolded 208.41

Bifold (Example 5A) 4.062 9.375 0.375 38.09 14.282 0.183 5

Trifold (Example 5B) 4.062 ^' 6.375 0.563 25.90 14.580 0.124 5

Quadrifold (Example 5C) 4.062 4.625 0.750 18.79 14.091 0.090 5

S-Fold (Example 5D) 4.062 3.375 1.125 13.71 14.425 0.066 5

Pretzel Fold (Example 5E) 4.062 2.250 1.500 9.14 13.711 0.044 5

*Folded to Unfolded Area

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Dimensions Area Volume Ratio* STEP S (in.) (in.²) (in.³)

Width Length Depth

Flat/Unfolded 231.59 Bifold (Example 6A) 4.375 9.625 0.383 42.11 16.128 0.182 Trifold (Example 6B) 4.375 6.125 0.575 26.80 15.408 0.116 Quadrifold (Example 6C) 4.375 4.750 0.767 20.78 15.939 0.090 S-Fold (Example 6D) 4.375 3.250 1.150 14.22 16.352 0.061 Pretzel Fold (Example 6E) 4.375 2.375 1.534 10.39 15.939 0.045

*Folded to Unfolded Area HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Dimensions Area Volume Ratio* STEP 6 (in.) (in.²) (in.³)

Width Length Depth

Flat/Unfolded 265.52 Bifold (Example 7A) 4.500 10.375 0.399 46.69 18.628 0.176 Trifold (Example 7B) 4.500 6.000 0.599 27.00 16.173 0.102 Quadrifold (Example 7C) 4.500 5.250 0.798 23.63 18.853 0.089 S-Fold (Example 7D) 4.500 3.750 1.197 16.88 20.199 0.064 Pretzel Fold (Example 7E) 4.500 2.500 1.596 11.25 17.955 0.042

^♦Folded to Unfolded Area

Example IA

A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^® diaper, available from Kimberly-Clark

Corporation, Neenah, WI) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "pr eemie" size, configured to fit a premature infant. The diaper was positioned in its unfolded configuration, i.e. , it's laid flat with unretracted elastics and extended to ungathered length configuration, and, as disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "fo otprint" of 99.59 inches². The area was determined as described below.

A rectangular sheet of translucent paper large enough to cover the absorbent article was obtained and utilized. The length and width of the sheet was measured to die nearest 0.01 inch. The paper was then weighed to the nearest 0.001 gram. The weight measurement was divided by the area measurement to determine the basis weight of the paper. The article, in this instance, the diaper, was opened completely, including any fasteners, and positioned in the laid flat configuration described above, on a planar surface. The article was taped to the surface using masking tape. For other disposable absorbent articles, such as training pants and adult incontinence pants, the articles were cut on each side between the leg openings and the waist opening prior to being positioned and taped to the planar surface. The sheet was positioned over and upon the disposable absorbent article, and a tracing of the outer perimeter, including fasteners, was made on the sheet. The paper was then cut along the traced line and weighed. The weight of the paper was multiplied by the inverse of the basis weight obtained previously. The result was an estimate of the total square inches of the absorbent article, which was reported to the nearest 0.01 in².

The diaper was then folded into the bifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 4 by hand. The dimensions of the bifolded diaper were then measured. That is, the diaper was positioned on a planar surface and restrained by hand, if necessary, in the folded position, while the length measurement 138 and the width measurement 140 were obtained and recorded.

The depth measurement 142 was obtained by measuring a standard packaged bag of articles, that is, in this instance, a bag containing bifolded diapers. The height of the bag was divided by the total number of panels (for example, in a bag of 24 bifolded diapers, there are 48 panels; diapers in the bag were packaged in the bag horizontally relative to the top height of the bag). These numbers were recorded. All measurements relating to diapers are in Tables 1 and 4.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 3.750 inches and the length was 5.750 inches. The area or "footprint" was 21.56 inches². The calculated depth was 0.329 inches². The volume was 7.094 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the bifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.217.

Example IB A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "pre emie", configured to fit a premature infant. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 99.59 inches². The diaper was folded into the trifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 5 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 3.750 inches and the length was 3.875 inches. The area or "footprint" was 14.53 inches². The calculated depth was 0.494 inches. The volume was 7.178 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the trifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.146.

Example IC

A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "pre emie" size, configured for a premature infant. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "fo otprint" of 99.59 inches². The diaper was folded into the quadrifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 6 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 3.750 inches and the length was 2.875 inches. The area or "footprint" was 10.78 inches². The calculated depth was 0.658 inches. The volume was 7.094 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of die quadrifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.108.

Example ID A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "pre emie" size, configured for a premature infant. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, and as disclosed in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 99.59 inches². The diaper was folded into the "S " folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 7 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 3.75 inches and the length was 2.000 inches. The area or "footprint" was 7.50 inches². The calculated depth was 0.988 inches. The volume was 7.410 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the " S" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.075.

Example IE A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "pre emie" size, configured for a premature infant. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footp rint" of 99.59 inches². The diaper was folded into the "Pretzel" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 8 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 3.750 inches and the lengtii was 1.500 inches. The area or "footprint" was 5.63 inches². The calculated depth was 1.317 inches. The volume was 7.408 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "Pretzel" folded di aper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.056. Example 2A A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Step 1" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 8 to about 14 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 128.61 inches². The diaper was folded into tire bifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 4 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.000 inches and the length was 6.625 inches. The area or "footprint" was 26.50 inches². The calculated depth was 0.343 inches. The volume was 9.100 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the bifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.206.

Example 2B A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 1" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 8 to about 14 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 128.61 inches². The diaper was folded into the trifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 5 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.000 inches and the lengtii was 4.375 inches. The area or "footprint" was 17.50 inches². The calculated depth was 0.514 inches. The volume was 9.000 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the trifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.136.

Example 2C A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 1" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 8 to about 14 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 128.61 inches². The diaper was folded into the quadrifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 6 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.000 inches and the length was 3.625 inches. The area or "footprint" was 14.50 inches². The calculated depth was 0.686 inches. The volume was 9.950 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the quadrifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.113.

Example 2D A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 1" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 8 to about 14 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 128.61 inches². The diaper was folded into the "S" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 7 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.000 inches and the length was 2.500 inches. The area or "footprint" was 10.000 inches². The calculated depth was 1.028 inches. The volume was 10.280 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "S" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.078.

Example 2E A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste 1" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 8 to about 14 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 128.61 inches². The diaper was folded into the "Pretzel" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 8 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.000 inches and the length was 1.750 inches. The area or "footprint" was 7.00 inches². The calculated depth was 1.317 inches. The volume was 9.219 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "Pretzel" folded di aper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.054.

Example 3A A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 2" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 12 to about 18 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 153.36 inches². The diaper was folded into the bifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 4 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.125 inches and the lengtii was 7.500 inches. The area or "footprint" was 30.94 inches². The calculated depth was 0.350 inches. The volume was 10.828 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the bifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.202.

Example 3B A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 2" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 12 to about 18 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 153.36 inches². The diaper was folded into the trifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 5 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.125 inches and the length was 4.875 inches. The area of die perimeter or "footprint" was 20.11 inches². The calculated deptii was 0.525 inches. The volume was 10.557 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the trifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.131.

Example 3C A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 2" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 12 to about 18 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 153.36 inches². The diaper was folded into the quadrifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 6 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.125 inches and the length was 3.875 inches. The area or "footprint" was 15.94 inches². The calculated depth was 0.700 inches. The volume was 11.189 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the quadrifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.104.

Example 3D A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Step 2" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 12 to about 18 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 153.36 inches². The diaper was folded into the "S" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 7 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.125 inches and the length was 2.750 inches. The area or "footprint" was 11.34 inches². The calculated depth was 1.050 inches. The volume was 11.910 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of die "S" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.074.

Example 3E A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 2" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 12 to about 18 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 153.36 inches². The diaper was folded into the "Pretzel" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 8 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.125 inches and die length was 1.875 inches. The area or "footprint" was 7.73 inches². The calculated deptii was 1.400 inches. The volume was 10.828 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "Pretzel" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.050.

Example 4A

A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 3" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 16 to about 28 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 172.6 inches². The diaper was folded into the bifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 4 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.500 inches and the length was 8.250 inches. The area or "footprint" was 37.13 inches². The calculated depdi was 0.354 inches. The volume was 13.142 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the bifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.215.

Example 4B A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Step 3" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 16 to about 28 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footp rint" of 172.6 inches². The diaper was folded into die trifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 5 by hand, and it was measured in die same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, die width was 4.500 inches and the length was 5.375 inches. The area or "footprint" was 24.19 inches². The calculated depth was 0.531 inches. The volume was 12.844 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the trifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.140.

Example 4C A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 3" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 16 to about 28 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 172.6 inches². The diaper was folded into the quadrifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 6 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.500 inches and the lengtii was 4.000 inches. The area or "foo tprint" was 18.0 inches². The depth was 0.708 inches. The volume was 12.744 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the quadrifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.104. Example 4D A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 3" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 16 to about 28 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 172.6 inches². The diaper was folded into the "S" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 7 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the widtii was 4.500 inches and the length was 3.000 inches. The area or "footprint" was 13.50 inches². The calculated depth was 1.063 inches. The volume was 14.351 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "S" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.078.

Example 4E A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 3" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 16 to about 28 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 172.6 inches². The diaper was folded into the "Pretz el" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 8 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.500 inches and the length was 1.875 inches. The area or "footprint" was 8.44 inches². The calculated depdi was 1.417 inches. The volume was 11.956 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "Pretzel" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.049.

Example 5A A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 4" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 22 to about 37 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 208.41 inches². The diaper was folded into the bifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 4 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.0625 inches and the length was 9.375 inches. The area or "footprint" was 38.09 inches². The calculated depth was 0.375 inches. The volume was 14.282 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the bifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.183.

Example 5B A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 4" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 22 to about 37 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 208.41 inches². The diaper was folded into the trifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 5 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.0625 inches and the length was 6.375 inches. The area or "footprint" was 25.90 inches². The calculated deptii was 0.563 inches. The volume was 14.580 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the trifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.124.

Example 5C A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a ''Ste 4" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 22 to about 37 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 208.41 inches². The diaper was folded into the quadrifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 6 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.0625 inches and the length was 4.625 inches. The area or "footprint" was 18.79 inches². The calculated deptii was 0.750 inches. The volume was 14.091 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the quadrifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.090.

Example 5D A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 4" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 22 to about 37 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 208.41 inches². The diaper was folded into the "S" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 7 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.0625 inches and the length was 3.375 inches. The area or "footprint" was 13.71 inches². The calculated depth was 1.125 inches. The volume was 14.425 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "S" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.066.

Example 5E A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 4" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of about 22 to about 37 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint " of 208.41 inches². The diaper was folded into the "Pret zel" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 8 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.0625 inches and the lengtii was 2.250 inches. The area or "footprint" was 9.14 inches². The calculated depth was 1.500 inches. The volume was 13.711 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "Pretzel" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.044.

Example 6A A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 5" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 27 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 231.59 inches². The diaper was folded into the bifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 4 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.375 inches and the length was 9.625 inches. The area or "footprint" was 42.11 inches². The calculated depth was 0.383 inches. The volume was 16.128 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the bifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.182.

Example 6B A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Step 5" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 27 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 231.59 inches². The diaper was folded into the trifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 5 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.375 inches and the lengtii was 6.125 inches. The area or "footprint" was 26.80 inches². The calculated depth was 0.575 inches. The volume was 15.408 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the trifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.116.

Example 6C A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Step 5" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 27 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, die diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 231.59 inches². The diaper was folded into the quadrifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 6 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.375 inches and the length was 4.750 inches. The area or "footprint" was 20.78 inches². The calculated depth was 0.767 inches. The volume was 15.939 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the quadrifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.090.

Example 6D

A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 5" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 27 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 231.59 inches². The diaper was folded into the "S" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 7 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.375 inches and the lengtii was 3.250 inches. The area of the perimeter or "footprint" was 14.22 inches². The calculated depth was 1.150 inches. The volume was 16.352 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "S" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.061.

Example 6E A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Step 5" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 27 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 231.59 inches². The diaper was folded into the "Pretzel" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 8 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, die width was 4.375 inches and the length was 2.375 inches. The area or "footprint" was 10.39 inches². The calculated depth was 1.534 inches. The volume was 15.939 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "Pretzel" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.045.

Example 7A A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 6" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 35 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 265.52 inches². The diaper was folded into the bifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 4 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.500 inches and the length was 10.375 inches. The area or "footprint" was 46.69 inches². The calculated depth was 0.399 inches. The volume was 18.628 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the bifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.176. Example 7B A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 6" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 35 pounds. The diaper was laid flat in its completely unfolded configuration, and, as disclosed in Table 1 , the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 265.52 inches². The diaper was folded into the trifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 5 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.5 inches and die length was 6.00 inches. The area or "footprint" was 27.00 inches². The calculated depth was 0.599 inches. The volume was 16.173 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the trifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.102.

Example 7C

A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 6" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 35 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 265.52 inches². The diaper was folded into the quadrifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 6 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.500 inches and the length was 5.250 inches. The area or "footprint" was 23.63 inches². The calculated depth was 0.798 inches. The volume was 18.853 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the quadrifolded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.089.

Example 7D A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 6" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 35 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 265.52 inches². The diaper was folded into the "S " folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 7 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.500 inches and the length was 3.750 inches. The area or "footprint" was 16.88 inches². The calculated depth was 1.197 inches. The volume was 20.199 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "S" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.064.

Example 7E A diaper (HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^®) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein. The diaper was a "Ste p 6" size, configured to fit an infant having a weight of over 35 pounds. The diaper was positioned in its completely unfolded configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 1, the diaper was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 265.52 inches². The diaper was folded into the "Pretzel" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 8 by hand, and it was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 1, the width was 4.500 inches and the length was 2.500 inches. The area or "footprint" was 11.25 inches². The calculated deptii was 1.596 inches. The volume was 17.955 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of die "Pretzel" folded diaper compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.042.

TABLE 2. Training Pant Dimensions

HUGGIES® PULL-UPS®

Training Pants Dimensions Area Volume Ratio*

(large size) (in.) (in.²) (in.³)

Width Length Depth

Flat/Unfolded 182.375

Bifold (Example 7A) 4.375 10.100 0.532 44,19 23.508 0.242

Quadrifold (Example 7C) 4.375 4.750 1.063 20.78 20.090 0.114

S-Fold (Example 7D) 4.375 3.250 1.595 14.22 22.679 0.078

Pretzel Fold (Example 7E) 4.375 2.500 2.126 10.94 23.253 0.060 *Folded to Unfolded Area

Example 8A

A training pant (HUGGIES^® PULL-UPS^®, available from Kimberly-Clark Corporation,

Neenah, WI) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1 and described in detail herein, except that it is an underwear-type of garment for a young child, as illustrated in FIG. 12. The training pant was a "1 arge" size. The training pant was positioned in its unfolded configuration. That is, the training pant was cut on each side from leg opening to waist opening, and laid flat with unretracted elastics and extended to ungathered length configuration, and measured as described previously in detail in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 2, the training pant was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 182.375 inches². The area was determined as described previously in Example IA

An identical uncut training pant, which in its configuration as underwear has a preexisting bifold (front and back panel seamed on each side) configuration was measured. That is the training pant was positioned on a planar surface and restrained by hand, if necessary, in the position, while the length measurement 138 and the width measurement 140 were obtained and recorded.

The deptii measurement 142 was obtained by measuring a standard packaged bag of articles, that is, in this instance, a bag containing training pants. The height of the bag was divided by the total number of panels in a manner substantially similar that that described previously in Example IA for diapers (training pants in the bag were packaged in die bag horizontally relative to the top height of the bag). These numbers were recorded. All measurements relating to training pants are in Tables 2 and 4.

As disclosed in Table 2, the widtii was 4.375 inches and the length was 10.100 inches. The area or "footprint" was 44.19 inches². The calculated depth was 0.532 inches. The volume was 23.508 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the folded training pant compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.242.

Example 8B

A training pant diaper (HUGGIES^® PULL-UPS^® "1 arge" size available from Kimberly- Clark Corporation, Neenah, WI) was produced which is similar to die article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein, except that die article is an underwear-type garment for a young child, as illustrated in FIG. 12. The training pant was positioned in its cut-open laid flat configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 2, the training pant was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 182.375 inches². The training pant was folded into die quadrifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 6 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 2, the width was 4.375 inches and the length was 4.750 inches. The area or "footprint" was 20.78 inches². The calculated depth was 1.063 inches. The volume was 22.090 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the folded training pant compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.114.

Example 8C A training pant diaper (HUGGIES^® PULL-UPS^® "large " size available from Kimberly-

Clark Corporation, Neenah, WI) was produced which is similar to die article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein, except that the article is an underwear-type garment for a young child, as illustrated in FIG. 12. The training pant was positioned in its cut-open laid flat configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 2, the training pant was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 182.375 inches². The training pant was folded into the "S" configuration illustrated in FIG. 7 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 2, the width was 4.375 inches and the length was 3.250 inches. The area or "footprint" was 14.22 inches². The calculated depth was 1.595 inches. The volume was 22.679 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the folded training pant compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.078.

Example 8D A training pant diaper (HUGGIES^® PULL-UPS^® "large " size available from Kimberly- Clark Corporation, Neenah, WI) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein, except that die article is an underwear-type garment for a young child, as illustrated in FIG. 12. The training pant was positioned in its cut-open laid flat configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 2, the training pant was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 182.375 inches². The training pant was folded into the "Pretzel" configuration illustrated in FIG. 8 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 2, the width was 4.375 inches and the length was 2.500 inches. The area or "footprint" was 10.94 inches². The calculated depth was 2.126 inches. The volume was 23.253 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the folded training pant compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.060. TABLE 3. Adult Incontinence Pant Dimensions

DEPEND®

Refastenable Under Wear Dimensions Area Volume Ratio*

(large size) (in.) (in.²) (in.³)

Width Length Depth

Flat/Unfolded 562.08

Bifold (Example 7A) 7.125 15.125 0.499 107.77 53.775 0.192

Quadrifold (Example 7C) 7.125 10.250 0.998 73.03 72.885 0.130

S-Fold (Example 7D) 7.125 5.275 1.497 37.58 56.264 0.068

Pretzel Fold (Example 7E) 7.125 3.625 1.996 25.83 51.553 0.046

^♦Folded to Unfolded Area

TABLE 4. Depth Measurement of Panel(s) of Product

Product Mechanical Compression¹'

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Preemie 0.1656

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Step 1 0.1714

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Step 2 0.1750

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Step 3 0.1771

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Step 4 0.1875

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Step 5 0.1917

HUGGIES® ULTRATRIM® Step 6 0.1955

HUGGIES® PULL-UPS® 0.2658 Training Pants (large size)

DEPEND® Refastenable 0.2495 Under Wear (large size)

1. This panel dimension was determined by measuring a standard bag of diapers HUGGIES^® ULTRATRIM^® diapers containing bifolded diapers and dividing the height of the bag by the total number of panels (diapers positioned horizontally relative to the top height of the bag). Using this average per panel thiclcness, the thickness of several fold configurations were calculated by multiplying the average per panel thickness by the number of panels in the given fold configuration.

2. This panel dimension was determined by measuring a standard bag of HUGGIES^® PULL-UPS^® training pants containing bifolded constructed pants and dividing the height of the bag by the total number of panels (training pants positioned horizontally relative to the top height of the bag). Using this average per panel thickness, the thickness of several fold configurations were calculated by multiplying the average per panel thickness by the number of panels in the given fold configuration.

3. This panel dimension was determine by measuring a standard bag of DEPEND^® Refastenable Under Wear containing bifolded constructed garments and dividing the height of the bag by the total number of panels (garments positioned horizontally relative to the top height of the bag). Using this average per panel thickness, the thiclcness of several fold configurations were calculated by multiplying the average per panel thickness by the number of panels in the given fold configuration.

Example 9A An adult incontinence garment " pant" (DEPEND^® Refastenable Disposable Underwear, size "larg e", available from Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Neenah, WI) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein, except that it is an underwear-type of garment for an adult, as illustrated in FIG. 13. The garment was positioned in its unfolded configuration. That is, the underwear garment was cut on each side from leg opening to waist opening, and laid flat with unretracted elastics and extended to ungathered length configuration, and measured as described previously in detail in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 3, the garment was measured to have an area or "footp rint" of 562.08 inches². The area was determined as described previously in Example IA. An identical uncut garment, which in its configuration as underwear has a pre-existing bifold (front and back panel formed on each anterior and posterior side) configuration was measured. That is the garment was positioned on a planar surface and restrained by hand, if necessary, in the position, while the length measurement 138 and the width measurement 140 were obtained and recorded. The depth measurement 142 was obtained by measuring a standard packaged bag of articles, that is, in this instance, a bag containing the adult garment described herein. The height of the bag was divided by the total number of panels in a manner substantially similar that that described previously in Example IA for diapers (the garments in the bag were packaged in the bag horizontally relative to the top height of the bag). These numbers were recorded. All measurements relating to the adult garment are in Tables 3 and 4.

As disclosed in Table 3, the width was 7.125 inches and the lengtii was 15.125 inches. The area or "footprint" was 107.77 inches². The calculated depth was 0.499 inches. The volume was 53.775 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the bifolded garment compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.192.

Example 9B An adult incontinence garment " pant" (DEPEND^® Refastenable Disposable Underwear, size "large", available from Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Neenah, WI) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein, except that it is an underwear-type of garment for an adult, as illustrated in FIG. 13. The garment was positioned in its cut-open laid flat configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 3, the garment was measured to have an area or "footpr int" of 562.08 inches². The garment was folded into die quadrifolded configuration illustrated in FIG. 6 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 3, die width was 7.125 inches and the lengtii was 10.250 inches. The area or "footprint" was 73.03 inches². The calculated depth was 0.998 inches. The volume was 72.885 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the folded garment compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.130.

Example 9C

An adult incontinence garment " pant" (DEPEND^® Refastenable Disposable Underwear, size "large", available from Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Neenah, WI) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein, except that it is an underwear- type of garment for an adult, as illustrated in FIG. 13. The garment was positioned in its cut-open laid flat configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 3, the garment was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 562.08 inches². The garment was folded into the "S" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 7 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 3, the widtti was 7.125 inches and the length was 5.275 inches. The area or "footprint" was 38.30 inches². The calculated depth was 1.497 inches. The volume was 56.264 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the "S" folded garment compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.068.

Example 9D

An adult incontinence garment " pant" (DEPEND^® Refastenable Disposable Underwear, size "large", available from Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Neenah, WI) was produced which is similar to the article illustrated in FIG. 1, and described in detail herein, except that it is an underwear-type of garment for an adult, as illustrated in FIG. 13. The garment was positioned in its cut-open laid flat configuration, as described in Example IA. As disclosed in Table 3, the garment was measured to have an area or "footprint" of 562.08 inches². The garment was folded into the "Pretzel" folded configuration illustrated in FIG. 8 by hand, and was measured in the same manner as described in Example IA.

As disclosed in Table 3, the width was 7.125 inches and the length was 3.625 inches. The area or "footprint" was 25.83 inches². The calculated depth was 1.996 inches. The volume was 51.553 inches³. The ratio of the footprint of the folded garment compared to its unfolded footprint was 0.046.

Having described the invention in rather full detail, it will be readily apparent that various changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. All of such changes and modifications are contemplated as being within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and any equivalents thereto.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A package enclosing a single disposable absorbent article, the package comprising a first piece of material and a second piece of material, the first piece of material and the second piece of material being operatively associated witii one another to enclose the absorbent article, the package having at least one viewing region in at least one of the pieces of material, the absorbent article having a folded configuration, an unfolded configuration, a bodyfacing surface and a garment facing surface, the garment facing surface having a graphic disposed on at least a portion thereof, and the absorbent article being in a folded configuration and enclosed within the package in a manner such that a least a portion of the graphic is situated in the viewing region.

2. The package of claim 1, wherein one of the pieces of material is more rigid than the other piece of material.

3. The package of claim 2, wherein the viewing region is situated in at least a portion of the piece of material that is less rigid.

4. The package of claim 1, wherein the first piece of material is configured to have a depth and the second piece of material is adapted to serve as a lid.

5. The package of claim 4, wherein the second piece of material is more rigid than the first piece of material.

6. The package of claim 5, wherein the viewing region is situated in at least a portion of the first piece of material.

7. The package of claim 5, wherein the viewing region is situated in at least a portion of the second piece of material.

8. The package according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein die absorbent article has a ratio in the folded configuration to the unfolded configuration of no more than 0.15.

9. The package according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the absorbent article has a ratio in the folded configuration to the unfolded configuration of no more than 0.09.

10. The package according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the package is vacuum packed.

11. A package enclosing a single disposable absorbent article, the package comprising a sheet of material having an interior surface and an exterior surface, the sheet of material having at least one viewing region and being configured to provide an interior space, the single disposable absorbent article having a folded configuration, an unfolded configuration, a bodyfacing surface and a garment facing surface, the garment facing surface having a graphic disposed on at least a portion thereof, the single disposable absorbent article being in a folded configuration and situated within the interior space of the package in a manner such that at least a portion of the graphic is situated in the viewing region.

12. The package of claim 11, wherein the absorbent article has a ratio in the folded configuration to the unfolded configuration of no more than 0.15.

13. The package of claim 11, wherein the absorbent article has a ratio in the folded configuration to the unfolded configuration of no more than 0.09.

14. The package of claim 11, wherein the absorbent article has a ratio in die folded configuration to the unfolded configuration of no more tiian 0.07.