[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2004062953A2 - Improving fuel consumption in large road-going vehicles - Google Patents

Improving fuel consumption in large road-going vehicles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004062953A2
WO2004062953A2 PCT/GB2004/000023 GB2004000023W WO2004062953A2 WO 2004062953 A2 WO2004062953 A2 WO 2004062953A2 GB 2004000023 W GB2004000023 W GB 2004000023W WO 2004062953 A2 WO2004062953 A2 WO 2004062953A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
trailer
vehicle
cab
fairing
roof
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/GB2004/000023
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2004062953A3 (en
Inventor
John Piper
Nick Carpenter
Ben Wood
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
PIDG Ltd
Original Assignee
PIDG Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GB0300413A external-priority patent/GB0300413D0/en
Priority claimed from GB0300412A external-priority patent/GB0300412D0/en
Priority claimed from GB0318235A external-priority patent/GB0318235D0/en
Application filed by PIDG Ltd filed Critical PIDG Ltd
Publication of WO2004062953A2 publication Critical patent/WO2004062953A2/en
Publication of WO2004062953A3 publication Critical patent/WO2004062953A3/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B62LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
    • B62DMOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
    • B62D35/00Vehicle bodies characterised by streamlining
    • B62D35/001For commercial vehicles or tractor-trailer combinations, e.g. caravans

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to the improvement of fuel efficiency for large road-going vehicles and more specifically to external components for such vehicles designed to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of the vehicle.
  • Trucks Light and heavy goods vehicles
  • articulated heavy goods vehicles typically have poor aerodynamic characteristics.
  • Design requirements principally providing the greatest practical volume of load space for a given length and width of vehicle, and government legislated dimensional constraints tend to dictate cuboid shapes for both the load carrying space (i.e. trailer/semi-trailer in the case of an articulated vehicle) and cab unit (i.e. tractor unit of an articulated vehicle). This tends to give rise to a vehicle shape with high drag, which in turn leads to poor fuel consumption.
  • the measurable aerodynamic characteristic most commonly used to quantify the drag associated with a particular vehicle shape is drag coefficient (Cd), a non-dimensional measure that takes account of prevailing variable factors such as air pressure, density and wind velocity to more readily allow a direct comparison between different configurations of vehicle. More specifically:
  • A frontal area of vehicle (m 2 )
  • a higher Cd value implies a vehicle with greater drag.
  • an improvement in the aerodynamic characteristics of a vehicle, giving rise to a reduction in drag, and therefore an improvement in fuel consumption, is reflected by a reduction of the Cd value.
  • fuel savings are a function of many parameters, they will generally be between 30% and 50% of a percentage reduction in Cd value. Particularly for a business running a large fleet of vehicles over long distances, even a modest improvement in Cd value can therefore have a significant impact on overall fuel savings for the fleet.
  • a typical Cd value for a passenger car is about 0.3.
  • Cd values for articulated goods vehicles are rarely better than about 0.5 and often much worse than this.
  • Fig. 1 shows a common layout for such side skirts 110 on the vehicle trailer 108. This results in a reduction in energy losses in the air due to turbulence and thus less drag is created.
  • the roof deflector 102 and collar 106 were found to reduce the
  • the present invention provides a number of bodywork components that can be employed individually or in any combination of two or more to improve the overall drag coefficient of a vehicle, in particular although not necessarily exclusively for articulated heavy goods vehicles.
  • the components have generally been developed with a view not only to reducing local drag but also to conditioning the airstream flowing around the vehicle.
  • There is a benefit for instance, in conditioning an airstream flowing around a cab unit (e.g. tractor unit of an articulated lorry) of a vehicle to provide a less turbulent airflow around the rear part of the vehicle (e.g. the trailer of an articulated vehicle).
  • a cab unit e.g. tractor unit of an articulated lorry
  • similar benefits are obtained by conditioning airflow around the forward part of a vehicle trailer to provide less turbulent airflow around the rear part of the vehicle.
  • features of the design of the cab unit e.g. tractor unit of an articulated lorry
  • features of the design of the vehicle trailer e.g. semi-trailer
  • the present invention provides a roof fairing for a vehicle, the vehicle having a cab and a rear container part that protrudes upwardly above the cab, the roof fairing comprising a curved surface that extends from a front end adjacent a forward edge of the cab roof to a rear end adjacent a forward edge of the roof of the container part, the curvature of the surface being designed to result in a progressive increase in the pressure gradient of air flowing over the surface from its front end to its rear end.
  • the surface of the fairing will have an elliptical curvature to achieve the desired pressure gradient profile.
  • the fairing surface and the surface of the side walls (if provided) at the trailing edge of the roof fairing are substantially parallel to the adjacent surfaces (i.e. roof and sides) of the container part. This helps to establish a smooth airflow from the roof fairing over the container part.
  • the sides of the fairing are preferably closed by side walls extending between the fairing surface, the cab roof and the front wall of the container part.
  • the junction of the fairing surface and each side wall is smoothly radiused.
  • the invention provides a collar extending from the rear of the cab sides towards the trailer, the collar terminating adjacent the respective forward end of the container part side walls, an outer surface of the collar at its trailing edge being substantially in the plane of the respective container side wall.
  • the collar provides for a smooth transition between the cab sides and the trailer sides.
  • the spacing between the trailing edge of the collar and the front end of the container part is no more than 500mm, more preferably no more than 300mm and most preferably 150mm or smaller (in an articulated vehicle, this dimension is measured with the tractor and trailer in a straight line configuration).
  • the invention provides a lower airdam for a cab unit, for example the tractor unit of an articulated heavy goods vehicle, the airdam extending across the width of the front, bottom edge of cab unit, wherein the airdam is profiled to extend closer to the ground at its centre than at its ends.
  • Air dams are in themselves known. They are used to moderate the airflow beneath the vehicle. They also serve to fair the front wheels of the vehicle.
  • the air dam of the present invention enables a majority of the width of the dam to be closer to the ground, giving greater control of airflow, whilst still providing sufficient ground clearance at its outer ends to avoid obstacles (e.g. curbs) when the vehicle is turning.
  • the invention provides a cab chassis fairing for the tractor unit of an articulated vehicle, the fairing comprising a substantially flat panel extending along a side of the tractor unit adjacent the ground, the lower edge of the panel being curved such that the ground clearance is greater towards the centre of the panel.
  • Cab chassis fairings are known, but by profiling the lower edge of the fairing in this way dead air is dragged from below the floor plan of the tractor unit helping to balance the airflow proceeding under the trailer and preventing the air from damming up beneath the tractor unit behind the fairing.
  • the present invention provides a cab chassis fairing for the tractor unit of an articulated vehicle, the fairing comprising a substantially flat panel extending along a side of the tractor unit adjacent the ground, the panel having one or more openings for venting air from beneath the trailer.
  • the fairing covers the wheels, it is preferably arranged to allow visual inspection of the wheel nuts and tyre tread.
  • Another preferred feature of the fairing if the wheels are covered is the inclusion of one or more brake cooling openings to allow brake heat to dissipate and preferably also to encourage a flow of air through the wheel cover into the area occupied by the brakes.
  • the turning vanes create an 'effective larger radius' to the oncoming airflow. This reduces turbulence build up around the 'A'-pillar itself. A smooth fully attached flow is promoted aft of the 'A'-pillar leading to lower aerodynamic pressure drag and a better conditioned airflow over the cab collar (if present).
  • the position and design of these deflectors is a function of an offset of the radial distance to the 'A'-pillar, and the chord length is as large as possible while not creating any blind spots for the driver on either side of the cab that may interfere with vision.
  • the shape of the rear of the deflector may additionally be designed so as not to interfere with the opening articulation of the driver and passenger doors.
  • the invention provides a wing mirror for a vehicle, the wing mirror comprising a housing to support the mirror and means for mounting the housing adjacent the vehicle's 'A'-pillar, the housing having an outer surface that has a shape derived from the outwardly facing surface of the 'A'-pillar but that has a radius of curvature greater than that of the 'A'-pillar.
  • the effect of a wing mirror in accordance with the invention is to increase the apparent radius of the 'A'-pillar, improving control of the boundary layer to reduce turbulence and consequently reduce drag attributable to the 'A'-pillar.
  • the improvement offered by preferred embodiments of the wing mirror can result in a reduction of drag over and above that achieved by simply removing a vehicles wing mirrors altogether. That is to say, the improvements resulting from better control of the boundary layer around the 'A'-pillar outweigh any increase in drag due to the presence of the wing mirrors.
  • the shape and curvature of the wing mirror surface are, as noted above, derived from the shape (and in particular curvature) of the 'A'-pillar.
  • the optimal shape will vary with the 'A'-pillar but can be derived through normal design steps. Typically, this will be done by first approximating the shape of the 'A'-pillar to a curve. This can be done at various locations along the length of the pillar or, alternatively, a curve derived for one location (e.g. the top of the pillar) can be assumed for the complete length of the pillar. The curvature of the outer surface of the mirror is then generated as a multiple of this approximated shape of the 'A'-pillar.
  • the extent of the surface of the mirror and it's offset from the 'A'-pillar are chosen to maximise the chord length of the mirror whilst taking into account the drivers eye lines (i.e. the need for the driver to be able to see the mirror glass and to see around the mirror.
  • the means for mounting the wing mirror housing on the vehicle are preferably one or more support arms which are themselves shaped to minimise drag. For instance they may be thin, gently curved elements which form upper and lower extensions of the outer surface of the wing mirror housing. In this way they may themselves contribute to the control of the boundary layer of the air flowing around the 'A'-pillar.
  • 'A'-pillar deflectors in combination with a wing mirror in accordance with this aspect of present invention to give even greater reduction in drag.
  • the 'A'-pillar deflector could be mounted in a conventional manner, in-board of the inventive wing mirror.
  • an 'A'-pillar deflector is formed integrally with the wing mirror so that these two elements can be straightforwardly mounted to the vehicle as a single component.
  • the 'A'-pillar deflector element can extend between and be supported by the wing mirror housing supports.
  • the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer), the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the lower edge of the panel being curved such that the ground clearance is greater towards the centre of the panel.
  • a trailer e.g. a semi-trailer
  • the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the lower edge of the panel being curved such that the ground clearance is greater towards the centre of the panel.
  • the shape of the lower edge of the panel maximises the depth and therefore the area faired of the vehicle. This profiling of the lower edge also has the effect of drawing dead air from below the floor of the trailer. This helps to balance the airflow proceeding to the rear of the trailer, preventing the air damming up beneath the trailer behind the fairing.
  • the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer), the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the panel having one or more openings for venting air from beneath the trailer.
  • a trailer e.g. a semi-trailer
  • the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the panel having one or more openings for venting air from beneath the trailer.
  • the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer), the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the side skirt comprising a laterally extending wall adjacent a wheel or wheels of the trailer.
  • a trailer e.g. a semi-trailer
  • the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the side skirt comprising a laterally extending wall adjacent a wheel or wheels of the trailer.
  • the side skirt comprises a pair of such walls, one to the front and one to the rear of the trailer wheel or wheels.
  • the wall or walls most preferably extend parallel to the wheel axles. It is also preferable that they extend the full width of the wheel or wheels that they are adjacent to.
  • the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) of an articulated vehicle, the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the side skirt comprising a lateral wall at its front end (adjacent its connection to a tractor unit), this lateral wall being profiled in plan view substantially as an arc centred on the axis about which the trailer articulates (e.g. the trailer kingpin).
  • the forward end of the skirt can be close to the tractor unit rear end at the trailer sides, without compromising the articulation of the trailer.
  • trailer is a semi-trailer, having legs to support its front end, lateral walls at the front of the side skirts can serve to fair the trailer legs.
  • the present invention provides trailer having a pair of side skirts, one on either side of the trailer, each side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground and comprising a lateral wall at its front end (adjacent its connection to a tractor unit), wherein the lateral walls extend in towards the centre of the trailer to leave a gap between them that defines a channel, the width of which is selected to control airflow underneath the trailer.
  • the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) of an articulated vehicle, the side skirt comprising substantially flat panels extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground to the front and rear of the wheels of the trailer, the side skirt further comprising a cover for the trailer wheels comprising a substantially flat panel arranged to provide a substantially continuous surface along the lower side of the trailer over the wheels.
  • a trailer e.g. a semi-trailer
  • the side skirt comprising substantially flat panels extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground to the front and rear of the wheels of the trailer, the side skirt further comprising a cover for the trailer wheels comprising a substantially flat panel arranged to provide a substantially continuous surface along the lower side of the trailer over the wheels.
  • the wheel covers panels are arranged to allow visual inspection of the wheel nuts and tyre tread within a confined space at the trailer side, e.g. of less than 500mm. This allows these inspections to take place in trailer parks or yards for instance, where trailers are often parked very close to one another. This may be achieved, for example, by hinging the wheel cover at its lower edge so that its upper edge can be hinged out to allow a view of the wheel or wheels that it covers.
  • wheel cover panels Another preferred feature of the wheel cover panels is the inclusion of one or more brake cooling openings to allow brake heat to dissipate and preferably also to encourage a flow of air through the wheel cover into the area occupied by the brakes.
  • the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer, the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, a rear end of the side skirt tapering inwardly towards the centre of the trailer.
  • a trailer e.g. a semi-trailer, the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, a rear end of the side skirt tapering inwardly towards the centre of the trailer.
  • this tapering surface of the side skirt is curved, the tapering curvature (and thus energisation of the trailer's aerodynamic wake) of the lower rear area of the side skirt being designed dependant on the upstream conditioning provided by the forward parts of the side skirt design.
  • the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) comprising a rear crash bar that is aerodynamically shrouded.
  • a trailer e.g. a semi-trailer
  • a rear crash bar that is aerodynamically shrouded.
  • Such shrouding of the crash bar can be particularly beneficial in a trailer having side skirts s they result in more energetic air at the trailer rear, which in turn causes the local drag of the crash bar to increase.
  • Simple aerodynamic shrouding e.g. a shroud of ovoid cross-section, can bring about a substantial improvement.
  • trailer bogeys i.e. one or more pairs of trailer wheels and their associated axle(s) and mounting structure
  • the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) having at least one bogey, the trailer further comprising a bogey axle shroud mounted in front (i.e. upstream) of the bogey and arranged to deflect air around the bogey.
  • a trailer e.g. a semi-trailer
  • the trailer further comprising a bogey axle shroud mounted in front (i.e. upstream) of the bogey and arranged to deflect air around the bogey.
  • the shroud In addition to serving to fair the bogey, the shroud also aids the overall slowing down of airspeed beneath the trailer (helping to reduce drag).
  • the bogey shroud preferably extends across substantially the whole width of the trailer. It may have the form of the bow of a boat, with a central point that extends further forward the its edges.
  • the shroud can conveniently also serve to guide air out through the skirt side vents.
  • the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) comprising sidewalls and a roof, a rear portion of the trailer roof curving downwardly towards the rear of the trailer.
  • a trailer e.g. a semi-trailer
  • this curving which has the effect of creating a vertical taper to the rear of the trailer, commences at least one metre from the rear end of the trailer.
  • the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) comprising sidewalls and a roof, rear end portions of the trailer sidewalls curving inwardly towards the rear of the trailer.
  • a trailer e.g. a semi-trailer
  • this curving of the sidewalls which has the effect of creating a horizontal taper to the rear of the trailer, commences at least 300 millimetres from the rear end of the trailer.
  • the curvature and location if the tapering surfaces is chosen so as not to compromise the rear loading aperture size, the operation of the rear door of the trailer (e.g. a roller shutter door), or the overall useable load space.
  • buffers are mounted to the rear of the trailer. Such buffers are known and are used distribute impact forces over a large area (they are typically an elastomeric moulded component).
  • the buffer is preferably continuous around the rear perimeter of the trailer.
  • the outer surface of the buffer is preferably profiled to continue the aerodynamic taper of the roof and/or sidewall surfaces and the buffer is fixed to the trailer rear in a manner that minimises the interference with/distortion of this surface.
  • the top region of the may incorporates a 'rain gully' to ensure any rain on the roof of the trailer is directed to the sides.
  • vortex generators are preferably formed in on the tapering surface of the roof and/or sidewalls. These serve to delay separation of the airflow from the curved (cambered) surface.
  • the preferred vortex generators have a "wishbone" formation.
  • the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) comprising sidewalls, a floor and a roof, rear end portions of the trailer roof, floor and sidewalls extending rearwardly beyond a closure means (e.g. a roller shutter) at the rear end of the trailer.
  • a closure means e.g. a roller shutter
  • Preferred embodiments of the invention may employ one or any combination of two or more of the various cab and trailer aspects of the invention (and their preferred features) set out above.
  • the invention also provides a cab unit for a vehicle, preferably an articulate vehicle, comprising one or more of the cab aspects of the invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above.
  • the invention also provides a vehicle trailer comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various trailer aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above.
  • the invention also provides a vehicle having a cab comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various cab aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above.
  • the invention also provides a vehicle having a trailer comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various trailer aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above.
  • the invention also provides a vehicle having a cab comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various cab aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above and a trailer comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various trailer aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a prior art articulated heavy goods vehicle
  • Figure 2 shows an articulated heavy goods vehicle having tractor and trailer units incorporating features according to embodiments of various aspects of the present invention
  • Figure 3 is a rear three-quarter view of the tractor unit of the vehicle of
  • Figures 4a and 4b show (schematically) elements of the undercarriage bodywork of the trailer of the vehicle of Fig. 1 ;
  • Figure 5 is a schematic plan view of a trailer underside employing features in accordance with an embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 6 is a schematic view of the cambered rear end surfaces of a trailer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
  • Figures 7a and 7c show vertical and horizontal sections through the cambered rear wall section of a trailer according to an embodiment of the invention, and Figures 7b and 7d show similar sections through a conventional trailer rear end;
  • Figure 8 is a perspective view from the rear of a heavy goods vehicle employing aerodynamic features in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 9 illustrates a pair of wing mirrors according to an embodiment of the present invention mounted on a cab unit (shown in a wire frame depiction) of an articulated vehicle;
  • Figure 10 is a front view of the cab and wing mirrors of figure 9;
  • Figure 11 is a side view of the cab and mirror of figure 9.
  • Figure 12 is a plan view of the cab and mirrors of figure 9.
  • Figures 2 onwards illustrate (as modelled in a CAD system) tractor and trailer units of articulated heavy goods vehicles in accordance with embodiments of the various aspects of the present invention.
  • tractor and trailer unit subject of the embodiments of the present invention are described in turn below.
  • the cab and trailer features described below are used in combination, but need not be.
  • Other embodiments of the invention comprise one or more of the cab features and/or one or more of the trailer features.
  • the wing mirror features described further below may be used on vehicles employing any of the cab and/or trailer features, but also have independent merit and may be used, for instance, on vehicles that are otherwise conventional.
  • the roof fairing 50 can be a single piece moulded component. In the illustrated embodiment it is formed as a unitary component along with the collar (see below) that can be retrofitted to the vehicle tractor unit. Alternatively, the roof fairing could be formed as separate components. If incorporated during manufacture of the tractor unit, the roof fairing might alternatively be formed integrally with the cab walls.
  • the roof fairing has a substantially featureless, smoothly curved outer surface 52 that extends from a lower edge, flush with the edges of the cab roof, to sweep upwardly and rearwardly towards the trailer.
  • the shape of the fairing is designed to terminate as close as possible to the trailer unit without impeding its articulation. This is achieved in part by having side portions 54 of the fairing protruding less to the rear than the main, upper surface of the fairing.
  • the upper surface 52 of the fairing has a substantially elliptical curvature to result in a gradual increase of the pressure gradient from its lower front edge to its upper rear edge adjacent the trailer, where the fairing surface is substantially parallel to the trailer roof 56.
  • the fairing 50 also serves to better condition that air flowing over it and around the trailer, giving improved air flow around the trailer itself.
  • the collars 60 (one either side of the tractor unit) extend from the rear of the cab sides 62 of the tractor unit towards the trailer.
  • the profile of the rear edge 64 of each collar, and its rearward extent are designed to minimise the gap between cab and trailer without dramatically impeding the articulation of the trailer.
  • the gap is 150mm or less.
  • the surfaces of the collars 60 are generally featureless, with the aim of providing a smooth, turbulence free, flow of air from cab side wall to trailer.
  • the collar surfaces adjacent the rear edge are substantially in the plane of the trailer side walls. Again, this is done with a view to conditioning the air flow along the trailer sides.
  • the lower airdam 70 is mounted beneath the front of the tractor unit and extends across substantially its full width. It serves to control airflow beneath the tractor unit (and hence to some extent the trailer) and also to fair the front wheels 72 of the tractor unit.
  • the airdam extends further forward (and optionally also closer to the ground) at its centre 74 than at its outer ends. This allows the clearance between dam and ground to be kept to a practical minimum whilst still allowing sufficient ground clearance, particularly at the outer ends 76 of the dam, to clear kerbs and other upwardly protruding obstacles when the tractor unit is turning.
  • the cab chassis fairings 80 cover the sides of the tractor unit behind the cab.
  • the outwardly facing surface of the fairing is substantially featureless, with a view to maintaining a near turbulent free flow of air from the tractor unit sides along the sides of the trailer.
  • ducts 82 are provided in the fairings designed to encourage airflow to vent from underneath the tractor unit out to its sides.
  • the duct takes the form of an open channel that tapers outwards from front to rear. This helps push the air out.
  • the position of these venting ducts forward of the rear drive wheels 84 of the tractor unit serves to reduce the airflow speed directly in front of the wheels. This helps to reduce wheel drag as well reducing friction and pressure drag through a general reduction of the airspeed under the tractor unit.
  • the lower edge 86 of the fairing is shaped in an arc, with the ground clearance at the centre of the fairing being greater than at either end. This profile of the lower edge helps to prevent air from damming up under the tractor unit by allowing a controlled amount of air to bleed out sideways under the fairing.
  • the fairing 80 covers the rear wheels 84 of the tractor unit, the wheels being covered by a hinged door panel 88.
  • This panel is designed to provide as complete coverage as possible for the wheel areas, greatly reducing the associated drag.
  • this arrangement gives rise to the problem of a severe reduction in cooling airflow to the brakes.
  • cooling apertures/ducts 89 which are designed to take in an amount of fresh cool air to circulate in the wheel hub area at the front and expel (via external passive extraction) the hot air from the wheel hub area.
  • a feature of these ducts is a small depression (of approximately 50mm in this example) allowing air to flow into the aperture followed, slightly further downstream, by a deeper extraction surface (around 60mm deep in this example) running from inside the wheel hub area out to the external surface of the door, panel.
  • the brake cooling duct 89 is formed by a continuation of the features in the fairing wall that provide the ducts 82 for extracting air from below the tractor unit, but this need not necessarily be the case.
  • vanes 90 known as 'A'-pillar deflectors are placed along the
  • deflectors 90 is a function of an offset of the radial distance to the 'A'-pillar. They preferably extend over the maximum possible vertical length of the 'A'-pillar. They are attached at the top to the cab roof and the bottom to the cab bodywork. Their chord is relatively small (preferably less than 100mm) in order to avoid the creation of blind spots for the driver and to avoid fouling the door articulation.
  • FIGS 2 and 4 through 8 illustrate (by way of schematic CAD generated images) trailer units of articulated heavy goods vehicles.
  • the trailer units include a number of aerodynamic features in accordance with embodiments of the trailer apsects of the present invention, aimed at reducing the trailer drag (and therefore improving fuel efficiency).
  • undercarriage sidepods 2,4 also referred to as side skirts or undercarriage fairings fore and aft of the trailer rear bogey 6;
  • the trailer illustrated in Figs 2, 4 and 5 has front and rear sidepods 2,4 mounted along its side adjacent the ground. Similar pods would be mounted on the other side of the trailer.
  • Each side pod is designed as a box-like structure, which attaches as smoothly and seamlessly as possible to the underside of the trailer unit at the approximate level of the loading floor.
  • the surfaces are substantially flat and featureless and the external walls are aligned with the maximum width of the trailer, for the most part.
  • End walls 14, 16, 18 (best seen in figs 4 and 5) of the sidepods, adjacent the trailer wheels 20, are designed to lie as close as practically possible to the adjacent wheel(s) and are of the same width or span as the wheel. This controls the amount of air the wheel is exposed to and thus reduces related turbulence and drag.
  • Ducts 22 are designed to encourage airflow to vent from underneath the trailer out to its sides.
  • the duct takes the form of an open channel that tapers outwards from front to rear. This helps push the air out.
  • the flow of air through these ducts is also aided by the design of the Rear Bogey Fairing 10 (see below) which helps guide air to the ducts on either side of the trailer.
  • the ground clearance is increased in the centre 24 of the front sidepods 2 (seen most clearly in fig 2), preferably by more than 200mm. This allows the trailer sidepods to clear dips and bumps in the road.
  • the front sidepod is designed such that the depth increases again in side view in the areas around the wheels to increase faired area of the wheels and reduce ground clearance locally.
  • Figure 5 illustrates the plan view shape of the front-end wall 14 of the front sidepod 2. This has been generated by an articulation study with aim of getting the outer wall of the pod to extend as far forward as possible in order to reduce the gap between the tractor and trailer bodies, increasing streamlining, without compromising articulation of the trailer.
  • the rear sidepod sections 4 taper inboard extensively towards the rear of the trailer, as best seen in fig 5.
  • the curvature of the outer wall 26 of these pods is the result of a continuously progressive curvature to ensure pressure recovery stability and thus flow attachment.
  • the front wall 18 of the rear sidepod is as close as possible to the rear face of the trailer wheels 20 and approximately the same width.
  • the side view profile is generated to again ensure maximum depth for fairing coverage but is inflected to avoid very low clearances at the rearward part 28 as this is a common damage area due to backing into low walls etc.
  • the rear under-run bar (or crash bar) 30 is profiled or faired to produce an elliptical section.
  • the benefits of an elliptical or ovoid section are that the incoming flow angle of the approaching air is often far from the horizontal and steady at the rear of the vehicle.
  • An elliptical section allows a more universal, but effective fairing shape in view of the different approach angles.
  • the wheels of the trailer illustrated in Fig. 2 are covered by a door panel 8.
  • This panel is designed to provide as complete coverage as possible for the wheel areas, greatly reducing the associated drag.
  • this arrangement gives rise to the problem of a severe reduction in cooling airflow to the brakes.
  • This is solved by the provision of cooling apertures/ducts 32 which are designed to take in an amount of fresh cool air to circulate in the wheel hub area at the front and expel (via external passive extraction) the hot air from the wheel hub area.
  • a feature of these ducts is a small depression (of approximately 50mm in this example) allowing air to flow into the aperture followed, slightly further downstream, by a deeper extraction surface (around 60mm deep in this example) running from inside the wheel hub area out to the external surface of the door cover.
  • the door 8 hinges from the bottom to enable quick inspection of tyre tread and wheel nuts, from above, when parked very close other trailers in trailer yards.
  • the door panel is also quickly removable in order easily to change wheels should that be necessary.
  • the trailer bogey fairing 10 is designed primarily to shroud the axle regions and components of the trailer bogey 6.
  • Air is encouraged, by means of a subtle snowplough shape, to flow towards the sides of the trailer and out the sides around the front of the wheel area or the ducted vent in the front sidepod (where present).
  • FIG. 6 shows how the top 40 and sides 42 of the rear end of a trailer can be cambered (tapered) inwardly.
  • the top section has a greater camber as the available drop is greater.
  • the flow exits the surface with an inclination that 'fills' the wake in.
  • the surface is a smooth and continuously progressive curvature, which provides a stable pressure recovery.
  • Mechanical design and packaging, including significant re-design of the standard roller shutter location has allowed the shape of this surface without compromising internal load space (see figure 7).
  • the rear impact rubber stops (not shown) are profiled to continue the streamlining to the furthest point rearward on the trailer. They also act to spread impact loads over a greater area when transmitted to the trailer rear frame. This will decrease impact damage at the rear.
  • the overall tapering effect reduces the rear-projected area and thus drag by virtue of reducing the surfaces acted upon by the base or wake drag of the vehicle.
  • the overhang 44 of the tapered rear end compared with the roller shutter 46 in it's closed position is designed to take advantage of an aerodynamic cavity effect. This effect manipulates vortex roll-up from the trailing edge of the vehicle and increases wake or base pressure, thus reducing drag.
  • vortex generators 48 are employed (see figure 6).
  • the vortex generators create opposing, twin vortices which mix fast and slow air close to the roof surface. This helps the boundary layer and thus general airflow stay attached to the trailer roof.
  • the vortex generators are a basic wishbone shape in plan view. The side view profile of the vortex generators is specific to the cambered surface they sit upon.
  • the side tapering section camber is less than the roof camber and is determined by the mechanical packaging requirements of the structural design of the rear upright posts defining the end of the trailer as illustrated by fig 7b.
  • a pair of wing mirrors 120 are mounted one either side of the tractor cab of an articulated heavy goods vehicle ("truck").
  • the trucks windscreen 122 and side windows 124 are separated by vertically extending 'A'-pillars 126 which, as can be seen in the drawings, are sharply radiused in horizontal cross-section.
  • a housing component 130 which forms the main body of the wing mirror, supports and houses the mirror 132 itself.
  • the orientation of the mirror within the housing can be adjusted between limits to give the driver of the truck the desired view.
  • Upper and lower support arms 134 mount the wing mirror to the truck cab adjacent its respective 'A'-pillar 126.
  • the outer surface of the housing 130 (i.e. the surface facing away from the TV-pillar) has a shape derived from the shape of the 'A'-pillar 126, especially the cross-sectional shape. However, the radius of curvature of this surface is greater, preferably at least 1.3 times the approximated radius of the • A'-pillar.
  • the outer surface of the housing 130 is spaced from the 'A'-pillar 126 and its location is a function of maximising span or chord length within the eye-sight constraints for the driver.
  • the support arms 134 form extensions of the outer surface of the mirror housing 130. They have a thin, plate form and curve in gently to respective upper and lower mounting points on the cab, above and below the 'A'-pillar 126. They are shaped to maximise the effective length of the wing mirror without impeding the driver's view past the wing mirror to any significant extent.
  • the components fitted to the trailer unit have been shown to independently provide a significant reduction in overall drag of about 20-25% wind-averaged.
  • a vehicle fitted with both the cab and trailer components would be expected to return a reduction in Cd of about 40% wind-averaged in comparison with a standard cab/trailer combination, equating to a very significant fuel saving, particularly across a large fleet of vehicles.
  • wing mirrors described above have been shown to provide a significant improvement in overall drag compared with a truck fitted with conventional wing mirrors. Indeed, as illustrated by the results in the table below, use of these wing mirrors can offer an improvement over running the truck without wing mirrors at all.
  • This improvement in drag factor (Cd) of over 4.5%, brought about by using wing mirrors according to an embodiment ofthe present invention, is likely to give a fuel saving in the region of about 1.5 to 2% which across a large fleet of trucks travelling long distances equates to a substantial annual cost saving.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Body Structure For Vehicles (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides a number of bodywork components that can be employed individually or in combination to improve the overall drag coefficient of a vehicle, especially an articulated heavy goods vehicle. The components have generally been developed with a view not only to reducing local drag but also to conditioning the airstream flowing around the vehicle. There is a benefit, for instance, in conditioning an airstream flowing around a cab unit (e.g. tractor unit of an articulated lorry) of a vehicle to provide a less turbulent airflow around the rear part of the vehicle (e.g. the traiter of an articulated vehicle). Likewise, similar benefits are obtained by conditioning airflow around the forward part of a vehicle traiter to provide less turbulent airflow around the rear part of the vehicle. The invention covers various aspects of the design of the cab unit (e.g. tractor unit of an articulated lorry) and of the vehicle traiter (e.g. semi-trailer).

Description

Improving Fuel Consumption in Large Road-Going Vehicles
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the improvement of fuel efficiency for large road-going vehicles and more specifically to external components for such vehicles designed to improve the aerodynamic characteristics of the vehicle.
Background
Large road-going vehicles such as light and heavy goods vehicles ("trucks"), including articulated heavy goods vehicles, typically have poor aerodynamic characteristics. Design requirements, principally providing the greatest practical volume of load space for a given length and width of vehicle, and government legislated dimensional constraints tend to dictate cuboid shapes for both the load carrying space (i.e. trailer/semi-trailer in the case of an articulated vehicle) and cab unit (i.e. tractor unit of an articulated vehicle). This tends to give rise to a vehicle shape with high drag, which in turn leads to poor fuel consumption.
The measurable aerodynamic characteristic most commonly used to quantify the drag associated with a particular vehicle shape is drag coefficient (Cd), a non-dimensional measure that takes account of prevailing variable factors such as air pressure, density and wind velocity to more readily allow a direct comparison between different configurations of vehicle. More specifically:
Cd = D / (0.5 x p x V2 x A)
where:
D = recorded drag force (N)
p = density of air (kg/m3) V = wind velocity (m/s)
A = frontal area of vehicle (m2)
A higher Cd value implies a vehicle with greater drag. Thus an improvement in the aerodynamic characteristics of a vehicle, giving rise to a reduction in drag, and therefore an improvement in fuel consumption, is reflected by a reduction of the Cd value. Whilst fuel savings are a function of many parameters, they will generally be between 30% and 50% of a percentage reduction in Cd value. Particularly for a business running a large fleet of vehicles over long distances, even a modest improvement in Cd value can therefore have a significant impact on overall fuel savings for the fleet.
A typical Cd value for a passenger car is about 0.3. In comparison, Cd values for articulated goods vehicles are rarely better than about 0.5 and often much worse than this.
Attempts have been made to improve the aerodynamic shape of goods vehicles in the past. The shape of articulated vehicle seen in the model illustrated in Fig. 1 is not untypical of such attempts. An angled air deflecting component 102, referred to as a roof deflector or fairing, is mounted on the roof of the tractor cab 104 and a flared collar 106 extends from the rear edge of the cab 104 towards the trailer 108. These components are designed to deflect air above and around the trailer and in practice offer improvements in drag. It is also known to employ side skirts 110 along the lower sides of such vehicles. Fig. 1 shows a common layout for such side skirts 110 on the vehicle trailer 108. This results in a reduction in energy losses in the air due to turbulence and thus less drag is created. In tests conducted using the model of Fig. 1 , the roof deflector 102 and collar 106 were found to reduce the
Cd value of the vehicle by about 14% and the side skirts 110 reduced drag by about 8%. It is a general aim of the present invention to provide further improvements in fuel consumption by creating further improvements to the aerodynamic characteristics of such vehicles.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention provides a number of bodywork components that can be employed individually or in any combination of two or more to improve the overall drag coefficient of a vehicle, in particular although not necessarily exclusively for articulated heavy goods vehicles.
The components have generally been developed with a view not only to reducing local drag but also to conditioning the airstream flowing around the vehicle. There is a benefit, for instance, in conditioning an airstream flowing around a cab unit (e.g. tractor unit of an articulated lorry) of a vehicle to provide a less turbulent airflow around the rear part of the vehicle (e.g. the trailer of an articulated vehicle). Likewise, similar benefits are obtained by conditioning airflow around the forward part of a vehicle trailer to provide less turbulent airflow around the rear part of the vehicle.
The various aspects of the invention set out below fall in to two principle categories: features of the design of the cab unit (e.g. tractor unit of an articulated lorry); and features of the design of the vehicle trailer (e.g. semi-trailer).
Cab Features
In a first cab aspect, the present invention provides a roof fairing for a vehicle, the vehicle having a cab and a rear container part that protrudes upwardly above the cab, the roof fairing comprising a curved surface that extends from a front end adjacent a forward edge of the cab roof to a rear end adjacent a forward edge of the roof of the container part, the curvature of the surface being designed to result in a progressive increase in the pressure gradient of air flowing over the surface from its front end to its rear end. Typically the surface of the fairing will have an elliptical curvature to achieve the desired pressure gradient profile.
It is particularly preferred that the fairing surface and the surface of the side walls (if provided) at the trailing edge of the roof fairing (i.e. closest to the container part) are substantially parallel to the adjacent surfaces (i.e. roof and sides) of the container part. This helps to establish a smooth airflow from the roof fairing over the container part.
The sides of the fairing are preferably closed by side walls extending between the fairing surface, the cab roof and the front wall of the container part. The junction of the fairing surface and each side wall is smoothly radiused.
In a second cab aspect, the invention provides a collar extending from the rear of the cab sides towards the trailer, the collar terminating adjacent the respective forward end of the container part side walls, an outer surface of the collar at its trailing edge being substantially in the plane of the respective container side wall.
In this way, the collar provides for a smooth transition between the cab sides and the trailer sides.
Preferably the spacing between the trailing edge of the collar and the front end of the container part is no more than 500mm, more preferably no more than 300mm and most preferably 150mm or smaller (in an articulated vehicle, this dimension is measured with the tractor and trailer in a straight line configuration).
In a third cab aspect, the invention provides a lower airdam for a cab unit, for example the tractor unit of an articulated heavy goods vehicle, the airdam extending across the width of the front, bottom edge of cab unit, wherein the airdam is profiled to extend closer to the ground at its centre than at its ends. Air dams are in themselves known. They are used to moderate the airflow beneath the vehicle. They also serve to fair the front wheels of the vehicle.
The air dam of the present invention enables a majority of the width of the dam to be closer to the ground, giving greater control of airflow, whilst still providing sufficient ground clearance at its outer ends to avoid obstacles (e.g. curbs) when the vehicle is turning.
In a fourth cab aspect, the invention provides a cab chassis fairing for the tractor unit of an articulated vehicle, the fairing comprising a substantially flat panel extending along a side of the tractor unit adjacent the ground, the lower edge of the panel being curved such that the ground clearance is greater towards the centre of the panel.
Cab chassis fairings are known, but by profiling the lower edge of the fairing in this way dead air is dragged from below the floor plan of the tractor unit helping to balance the airflow proceeding under the trailer and preventing the air from damming up beneath the tractor unit behind the fairing.
In a fifth cab aspect, the present invention provides a cab chassis fairing for the tractor unit of an articulated vehicle, the fairing comprising a substantially flat panel extending along a side of the tractor unit adjacent the ground, the panel having one or more openings for venting air from beneath the trailer.
By venting the inside of the fairing in this way air is dragged from below the cab unit helping to reduce airspeed under the cab, reducing friction and pressure drag. Particular benefits can be obtained if this feature is arranged to reduce airflow speed directly in front of the rear (typically drive) wheels of the tractor unit. The openings are therefore preferably located forward of and close to these wheels. Additional ducting can be provided in board of the fairing panel to force airflow from below the tractor unit out of the openings. The fairings of the fourth and fifth cab aspects, which are preferably featureless on their outer surface can also help provide a smooth transition for the airflow from the side of the tractor unit to the trailer side. This effect can be' further enhanced by adapting the fairing to cover the rear wheels of the tractor unit.
Where the fairing covers the wheels, it is preferably arranged to allow visual inspection of the wheel nuts and tyre tread. Another preferred feature of the fairing if the wheels are covered is the inclusion of one or more brake cooling openings to allow brake heat to dissipate and preferably also to encourage a flow of air through the wheel cover into the area occupied by the brakes.
It is a more specific aim of some cab aspects of the present invention to reduce the drag created by the sharp edges of the windscreen and/or vehicle wing mirrors.
It is known already to use so called 'A'-pillar deflectors, turning vane components that are mounted on the 'A'-pillars, spaced slightly from the 'A'- pillars themselves to improve the flow of air around the 'A'-pillars. However, they are rarely used in practice.
It has been found, however, that by using 'A'-pillar deflectors (turning vanes) in combination with one or more of the other cab aspects set forth above, further improvements to vehicle drag can be achieved. Such a combination is provided by a sixth cab aspect of the invention.
The turning vanes create an 'effective larger radius' to the oncoming airflow. This reduces turbulence build up around the 'A'-pillar itself. A smooth fully attached flow is promoted aft of the 'A'-pillar leading to lower aerodynamic pressure drag and a better conditioned airflow over the cab collar (if present). The position and design of these deflectors is a function of an offset of the radial distance to the 'A'-pillar, and the chord length is as large as possible while not creating any blind spots for the driver on either side of the cab that may interfere with vision. The shape of the rear of the deflector may additionally be designed so as not to interfere with the opening articulation of the driver and passenger doors.
In a seventh cab aspect the invention provides a wing mirror for a vehicle, the wing mirror comprising a housing to support the mirror and means for mounting the housing adjacent the vehicle's 'A'-pillar, the housing having an outer surface that has a shape derived from the outwardly facing surface of the 'A'-pillar but that has a radius of curvature greater than that of the 'A'-pillar.
The effect of a wing mirror in accordance with the invention is to increase the apparent radius of the 'A'-pillar, improving control of the boundary layer to reduce turbulence and consequently reduce drag attributable to the 'A'-pillar. Surprisingly, it has been found that the improvement offered by preferred embodiments of the wing mirror can result in a reduction of drag over and above that achieved by simply removing a vehicles wing mirrors altogether. That is to say, the improvements resulting from better control of the boundary layer around the 'A'-pillar outweigh any increase in drag due to the presence of the wing mirrors.
The shape and curvature of the wing mirror surface are, as noted above, derived from the shape (and in particular curvature) of the 'A'-pillar. The optimal shape will vary with the 'A'-pillar but can be derived through normal design steps. Typically, this will be done by first approximating the shape of the 'A'-pillar to a curve. This can be done at various locations along the length of the pillar or, alternatively, a curve derived for one location (e.g. the top of the pillar) can be assumed for the complete length of the pillar. The curvature of the outer surface of the mirror is then generated as a multiple of this approximated shape of the 'A'-pillar. The extent of the surface of the mirror and it's offset from the 'A'-pillar are chosen to maximise the chord length of the mirror whilst taking into account the drivers eye lines (i.e. the need for the driver to be able to see the mirror glass and to see around the mirror. The means for mounting the wing mirror housing on the vehicle are preferably one or more support arms which are themselves shaped to minimise drag. For instance they may be thin, gently curved elements which form upper and lower extensions of the outer surface of the wing mirror housing. In this way they may themselves contribute to the control of the boundary layer of the air flowing around the 'A'-pillar.
It may be advantageous to use 'A'-pillar deflectors in combination with a wing mirror in accordance with this aspect of present invention to give even greater reduction in drag. In this case, the 'A'-pillar deflector could be mounted in a conventional manner, in-board of the inventive wing mirror.
In an alternative embodiment of the invention, an 'A'-pillar deflector is formed integrally with the wing mirror so that these two elements can be straightforwardly mounted to the vehicle as a single component. For instance, the 'A'-pillar deflector element can extend between and be supported by the wing mirror housing supports.
Trailer Features
It has been found that appropriately designed side skirts can bring about a significant reduction in drag associated with the trailer.
In a first trailer aspect, the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer), the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the lower edge of the panel being curved such that the ground clearance is greater towards the centre of the panel.
By keeping the surface of the skirt as flat as possible and keeping any feature depths to a minimum, skin friction drag can be minimised.
The shape of the lower edge of the panel maximises the depth and therefore the area faired of the vehicle. This profiling of the lower edge also has the effect of drawing dead air from below the floor of the trailer. This helps to balance the airflow proceeding to the rear of the trailer, preventing the air damming up beneath the trailer behind the fairing.
In a second trailer aspect, the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer), the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the panel having one or more openings for venting air from beneath the trailer.
By venting the inside of the fairing in this way air is dragged from below the trailer unit helping to reduce airspeed under the trailer, reducing friction and pressure drag.
In a third trailer aspect, the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer), the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the side skirt comprising a laterally extending wall adjacent a wheel or wheels of the trailer.
Preferably, the side skirt comprises a pair of such walls, one to the front and one to the rear of the trailer wheel or wheels.
The wall or walls most preferably extend parallel to the wheel axles. It is also preferable that they extend the full width of the wheel or wheels that they are adjacent to.
By exhibiting some control over the pressure extremes that exist around a rotating wheel, these lateral walls adjacent the wheel help control turbulence and drag created by its rotation.
In a fourth trailer aspect, the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) of an articulated vehicle, the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, the side skirt comprising a lateral wall at its front end (adjacent its connection to a tractor unit), this lateral wall being profiled in plan view substantially as an arc centred on the axis about which the trailer articulates (e.g. the trailer kingpin). In this way, the forward end of the skirt can be close to the tractor unit rear end at the trailer sides, without compromising the articulation of the trailer.
Where the trailer is a semi-trailer, having legs to support its front end, lateral walls at the front of the side skirts can serve to fair the trailer legs.
In a fifth trailer aspect, the present invention provides trailer having a pair of side skirts, one on either side of the trailer, each side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground and comprising a lateral wall at its front end (adjacent its connection to a tractor unit), wherein the lateral walls extend in towards the centre of the trailer to leave a gap between them that defines a channel, the width of which is selected to control airflow underneath the trailer.
In a sixth trailer aspect, the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) of an articulated vehicle, the side skirt comprising substantially flat panels extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground to the front and rear of the wheels of the trailer, the side skirt further comprising a cover for the trailer wheels comprising a substantially flat panel arranged to provide a substantially continuous surface along the lower side of the trailer over the wheels.
Preferably, the wheel covers panels are arranged to allow visual inspection of the wheel nuts and tyre tread within a confined space at the trailer side, e.g. of less than 500mm. This allows these inspections to take place in trailer parks or yards for instance, where trailers are often parked very close to one another. This may be achieved, for example, by hinging the wheel cover at its lower edge so that its upper edge can be hinged out to allow a view of the wheel or wheels that it covers.
Another preferred feature of the wheel cover panels is the inclusion of one or more brake cooling openings to allow brake heat to dissipate and preferably also to encourage a flow of air through the wheel cover into the area occupied by the brakes.
In a seventh trailer aspect, the present invention provides a side skirt for a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer, the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, a rear end of the side skirt tapering inwardly towards the centre of the trailer.
It is particularly preferred that this tapering surface of the side skirt is curved, the tapering curvature (and thus energisation of the trailer's aerodynamic wake) of the lower rear area of the side skirt being designed dependant on the upstream conditioning provided by the forward parts of the side skirt design.
In an eighth trailer aspect, the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) comprising a rear crash bar that is aerodynamically shrouded.
Such shrouding of the crash bar can be particularly beneficial in a trailer having side skirts s they result in more energetic air at the trailer rear, which in turn causes the local drag of the crash bar to increase. Simple aerodynamic shrouding, e.g. a shroud of ovoid cross-section, can bring about a substantial improvement.
It has also been found that trailer bogeys (i.e. one or more pairs of trailer wheels and their associated axle(s) and mounting structure) contribute significantly to trailer drag.
In a ninth trailer aspect, the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) having at least one bogey, the trailer further comprising a bogey axle shroud mounted in front (i.e. upstream) of the bogey and arranged to deflect air around the bogey.
In addition to serving to fair the bogey, the shroud also aids the overall slowing down of airspeed beneath the trailer (helping to reduce drag). The bogey shroud preferably extends across substantially the whole width of the trailer. It may have the form of the bow of a boat, with a central point that extends further forward the its edges.
In preferred embodiments, where the trailer comprises vented side skirts, the shroud can conveniently also serve to guide air out through the skirt side vents.
The aerodynamic characteristics of the trailer's rear end have also been found to contribute significantly to drag. Aspects of the invention recognise that a curved and complex rear end shape can reduce drag.
In a tenth trailer aspect, the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) comprising sidewalls and a roof, a rear portion of the trailer roof curving downwardly towards the rear of the trailer.
Preferably this curving, which has the effect of creating a vertical taper to the rear of the trailer, commences at least one metre from the rear end of the trailer.
In an eleventh trailer aspect, the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) comprising sidewalls and a roof, rear end portions of the trailer sidewalls curving inwardly towards the rear of the trailer.
Preferably this curving of the sidewalls, which has the effect of creating a horizontal taper to the rear of the trailer, commences at least 300 millimetres from the rear end of the trailer.
Tapering the rear end of the trailer in the vertical and/or horizontal direction in this way increase the streamlining of the trailer rear end and results in a reduction in drag. Preferably the curvature and location if the tapering surfaces is chosen so as not to compromise the rear loading aperture size, the operation of the rear door of the trailer (e.g. a roller shutter door), or the overall useable load space. Preferably buffers are mounted to the rear of the trailer. Such buffers are known and are used distribute impact forces over a large area (they are typically an elastomeric moulded component). As is known, the buffer is preferably continuous around the rear perimeter of the trailer. Uniquely, the outer surface of the buffer is preferably profiled to continue the aerodynamic taper of the roof and/or sidewall surfaces and the buffer is fixed to the trailer rear in a manner that minimises the interference with/distortion of this surface.
Advantageously, the top region of the may incorporates a 'rain gully' to ensure any rain on the roof of the trailer is directed to the sides.
In order to help ensure that the maximum aerodynamic benefit is extracted from the tapered formation of the trailer rear, vortex generators are preferably formed in on the tapering surface of the roof and/or sidewalls. These serve to delay separation of the airflow from the curved (cambered) surface. The preferred vortex generators have a "wishbone" formation.
In a twelfth trailer aspect, the present invention provides a trailer (e.g. a semi-trailer) comprising sidewalls, a floor and a roof, rear end portions of the trailer roof, floor and sidewalls extending rearwardly beyond a closure means (e.g. a roller shutter) at the rear end of the trailer. The cavity defined at the rear of the trailer in this manner has been found to reduce drag.
Preferred embodiments of the invention may employ one or any combination of two or more of the various cab and trailer aspects of the invention (and their preferred features) set out above.
The invention also provides a cab unit for a vehicle, preferably an articulate vehicle, comprising one or more of the cab aspects of the invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above.
The invention also provides a vehicle trailer comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various trailer aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above. The invention also provides a vehicle having a cab comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various cab aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above.
The invention also provides a vehicle having a trailer comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various trailer aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above.
The invention also provides a vehicle having a cab comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various cab aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above and a trailer comprising features in accordance with one or more of the various trailer aspects of the present invention (and/or their preferred features) set out above.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Embodiments of the invention are described below, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 illustrates a prior art articulated heavy goods vehicle;
Figure 2 shows an articulated heavy goods vehicle having tractor and trailer units incorporating features according to embodiments of various aspects of the present invention;
Figure 3 is a rear three-quarter view of the tractor unit of the vehicle of
Fig. 1 ;
Figures 4a and 4b show (schematically) elements of the undercarriage bodywork of the trailer of the vehicle of Fig. 1 ;
Figure 5 is a schematic plan view of a trailer underside employing features in accordance with an embodiment of the invention; Figure 6 is a schematic view of the cambered rear end surfaces of a trailer in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
Figures 7a and 7c show vertical and horizontal sections through the cambered rear wall section of a trailer according to an embodiment of the invention, and Figures 7b and 7d show similar sections through a conventional trailer rear end;
Figure 8 is a perspective view from the rear of a heavy goods vehicle employing aerodynamic features in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 9 illustrates a pair of wing mirrors according to an embodiment of the present invention mounted on a cab unit (shown in a wire frame depiction) of an articulated vehicle;
Figure 10 is a front view of the cab and wing mirrors of figure 9;
Figure 11 is a side view of the cab and mirror of figure 9; and
Figure 12 is a plan view of the cab and mirrors of figure 9.
Description of Embodiments
Figures 2 onwards illustrate (as modelled in a CAD system) tractor and trailer units of articulated heavy goods vehicles in accordance with embodiments of the various aspects of the present invention.
The features of the tractor and trailer unit subject of the embodiments of the present invention are described in turn below. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the cab and trailer features described below are used in combination, but need not be. Other embodiments of the invention comprise one or more of the cab features and/or one or more of the trailer features. The wing mirror features described further below may be used on vehicles employing any of the cab and/or trailer features, but also have independent merit and may be used, for instance, on vehicles that are otherwise conventional.
Cab Features
Cab features in accordance with embodiments of the cab aspects of the present invention are described below by way of example with reference to Figures 2 and 3.
Roof Fairing
The roof fairing 50 can be a single piece moulded component. In the illustrated embodiment it is formed as a unitary component along with the collar (see below) that can be retrofitted to the vehicle tractor unit. Alternatively, the roof fairing could be formed as separate components. If incorporated during manufacture of the tractor unit, the roof fairing might alternatively be formed integrally with the cab walls.
As can be seen, the roof fairing has a substantially featureless, smoothly curved outer surface 52 that extends from a lower edge, flush with the edges of the cab roof, to sweep upwardly and rearwardly towards the trailer.
The shape of the fairing is designed to terminate as close as possible to the trailer unit without impeding its articulation. This is achieved in part by having side portions 54 of the fairing protruding less to the rear than the main, upper surface of the fairing.
The upper surface 52 of the fairing has a substantially elliptical curvature to result in a gradual increase of the pressure gradient from its lower front edge to its upper rear edge adjacent the trailer, where the fairing surface is substantially parallel to the trailer roof 56.
In this way, as well as reducing drag associated with the tractor unit and the flat front face of the trailer, the fairing 50 also serves to better condition that air flowing over it and around the trailer, giving improved air flow around the trailer itself.
Collar
The collars 60 (one either side of the tractor unit) extend from the rear of the cab sides 62 of the tractor unit towards the trailer.
The profile of the rear edge 64 of each collar, and its rearward extent are designed to minimise the gap between cab and trailer without dramatically impeding the articulation of the trailer. Desirably, the gap is 150mm or less.
As with the roof fairing 50, the surfaces of the collars 60 are generally featureless, with the aim of providing a smooth, turbulence free, flow of air from cab side wall to trailer. The collar surfaces adjacent the rear edge are substantially in the plane of the trailer side walls. Again, this is done with a view to conditioning the air flow along the trailer sides.
Lower Airdam
The lower airdam 70 is mounted beneath the front of the tractor unit and extends across substantially its full width. It serves to control airflow beneath the tractor unit (and hence to some extent the trailer) and also to fair the front wheels 72 of the tractor unit.
The airdam extends further forward (and optionally also closer to the ground) at its centre 74 than at its outer ends. This allows the clearance between dam and ground to be kept to a practical minimum whilst still allowing sufficient ground clearance, particularly at the outer ends 76 of the dam, to clear kerbs and other upwardly protruding obstacles when the tractor unit is turning.
Cab Chassis Fairing
The cab chassis fairings 80 (one either side of the tractor unit) cover the sides of the tractor unit behind the cab. The outwardly facing surface of the fairing is substantially featureless, with a view to maintaining a near turbulent free flow of air from the tractor unit sides along the sides of the trailer.
However, ducts 82 are provided in the fairings designed to encourage airflow to vent from underneath the tractor unit out to its sides. The duct takes the form of an open channel that tapers outwards from front to rear. This helps push the air out. The position of these venting ducts forward of the rear drive wheels 84 of the tractor unit serves to reduce the airflow speed directly in front of the wheels. This helps to reduce wheel drag as well reducing friction and pressure drag through a general reduction of the airspeed under the tractor unit.
The lower edge 86 of the fairing is shaped in an arc, with the ground clearance at the centre of the fairing being greater than at either end. This profile of the lower edge helps to prevent air from damming up under the tractor unit by allowing a controlled amount of air to bleed out sideways under the fairing.
Unusually, the fairing 80 covers the rear wheels 84 of the tractor unit, the wheels being covered by a hinged door panel 88. This panel is designed to provide as complete coverage as possible for the wheel areas, greatly reducing the associated drag. However, this arrangement gives rise to the problem of a severe reduction in cooling airflow to the brakes.
This is solved by the provision of cooling apertures/ducts 89 which are designed to take in an amount of fresh cool air to circulate in the wheel hub area at the front and expel (via external passive extraction) the hot air from the wheel hub area. To achieve this, a feature of these ducts is a small depression (of approximately 50mm in this example) allowing air to flow into the aperture followed, slightly further downstream, by a deeper extraction surface (around 60mm deep in this example) running from inside the wheel hub area out to the external surface of the door, panel. As seen in the figures, in this example the brake cooling duct 89 is formed by a continuation of the features in the fairing wall that provide the ducts 82 for extracting air from below the tractor unit, but this need not necessarily be the case.
'A'-Pillar Deflectors
Turning vanes 90, known as 'A'-pillar deflectors are placed along the
'A'-pillar region of the cab unit. These turning vanes 90 create an 'effective larger radius' to the oncoming airflow. This reduces turbulence build up around the 'A'-pillar itself and smooth fully-attached flow is promoted aft of the 'A'-pillar leading to lower aerodynamic pressure drag.
The position and design of these deflectors 90 is a function of an offset of the radial distance to the 'A'-pillar. They preferably extend over the maximum possible vertical length of the 'A'-pillar. They are attached at the top to the cab roof and the bottom to the cab bodywork. Their chord is relatively small (preferably less than 100mm) in order to avoid the creation of blind spots for the driver and to avoid fouling the door articulation.
Trailer Features
Figures 2 and 4 through 8 illustrate (by way of schematic CAD generated images) trailer units of articulated heavy goods vehicles. As discussed in more detail below, the trailer units include a number of aerodynamic features in accordance with embodiments of the trailer apsects of the present invention, aimed at reducing the trailer drag (and therefore improving fuel efficiency).
The principle components that contribute to the reduction in drag are:
- undercarriage sidepods 2,4 (also referred to as side skirts or undercarriage fairings) fore and aft of the trailer rear bogey 6;
- trailer wheel covers 8; - a trailer bogey fairing 10; and
- a modified trailer rear end 12.
These elements are discussed in turn below and may be used alone, or more preferably in combination to reduce trailer drag.
Undercarriage Sidepods - Front & Rear Sections
The trailer illustrated in Figs 2, 4 and 5 has front and rear sidepods 2,4 mounted along its side adjacent the ground. Similar pods would be mounted on the other side of the trailer. Each side pod is designed as a box-like structure, which attaches as smoothly and seamlessly as possible to the underside of the trailer unit at the approximate level of the loading floor. The surfaces are substantially flat and featureless and the external walls are aligned with the maximum width of the trailer, for the most part.
End walls 14, 16, 18 (best seen in figs 4 and 5) of the sidepods, adjacent the trailer wheels 20, are designed to lie as close as practically possible to the adjacent wheel(s) and are of the same width or span as the wheel. This controls the amount of air the wheel is exposed to and thus reduces related turbulence and drag.
Ducts 22 (shown in fig 2) are designed to encourage airflow to vent from underneath the trailer out to its sides. The duct takes the form of an open channel that tapers outwards from front to rear. This helps push the air out. The flow of air through these ducts is also aided by the design of the Rear Bogey Fairing 10 (see below) which helps guide air to the ducts on either side of the trailer.
The ground clearance is increased in the centre 24 of the front sidepods 2 (seen most clearly in fig 2), preferably by more than 200mm. This allows the trailer sidepods to clear dips and bumps in the road. The front sidepod is designed such that the depth increases again in side view in the areas around the wheels to increase faired area of the wheels and reduce ground clearance locally.
Figure 5 illustrates the plan view shape of the front-end wall 14 of the front sidepod 2. This has been generated by an articulation study with aim of getting the outer wall of the pod to extend as far forward as possible in order to reduce the gap between the tractor and trailer bodies, increasing streamlining, without compromising articulation of the trailer.
The rear sidepod sections 4 taper inboard extensively towards the rear of the trailer, as best seen in fig 5. The curvature of the outer wall 26 of these pods is the result of a continuously progressive curvature to ensure pressure recovery stability and thus flow attachment.
As mentioned above, the front wall 18 of the rear sidepod is as close as possible to the rear face of the trailer wheels 20 and approximately the same width. The side view profile is generated to again ensure maximum depth for fairing coverage but is inflected to avoid very low clearances at the rearward part 28 as this is a common damage area due to backing into low walls etc.
The rear under-run bar (or crash bar) 30 is profiled or faired to produce an elliptical section. The benefits of an elliptical or ovoid section are that the incoming flow angle of the approaching air is often far from the horizontal and steady at the rear of the vehicle. An elliptical section allows a more universal, but effective fairing shape in view of the different approach angles.
Wheel Covers
The wheels of the trailer illustrated in Fig. 2 are covered by a door panel 8. This panel is designed to provide as complete coverage as possible for the wheel areas, greatly reducing the associated drag. However, this arrangement gives rise to the problem of a severe reduction in cooling airflow to the brakes. This is solved by the provision of cooling apertures/ducts 32 which are designed to take in an amount of fresh cool air to circulate in the wheel hub area at the front and expel (via external passive extraction) the hot air from the wheel hub area. To achieve this, a feature of these ducts is a small depression (of approximately 50mm in this example) allowing air to flow into the aperture followed, slightly further downstream, by a deeper extraction surface (around 60mm deep in this example) running from inside the wheel hub area out to the external surface of the door cover.
The door 8 hinges from the bottom to enable quick inspection of tyre tread and wheel nuts, from above, when parked very close other trailers in trailer yards. The door panel is also quickly removable in order easily to change wheels should that be necessary.
Trailer Bogey Fairing
As seen best in figure 4 the trailer bogey fairing 10 is designed primarily to shroud the axle regions and components of the trailer bogey 6.
Air is encouraged, by means of a subtle snowplough shape, to flow towards the sides of the trailer and out the sides around the front of the wheel area or the ducted vent in the front sidepod (where present).
Trailer Rear End
Assuming proper fore-body conditioning of the air flow, it is possible to create a tapering flow field to reduce wake size (and thus drag). Figure 6 shows how the top 40 and sides 42 of the rear end of a trailer can be cambered (tapered) inwardly. In this example, the top section has a greater camber as the available drop is greater. The flow exits the surface with an inclination that 'fills' the wake in. The surface is a smooth and continuously progressive curvature, which provides a stable pressure recovery. Mechanical design and packaging, including significant re-design of the standard roller shutter location has allowed the shape of this surface without compromising internal load space (see figure 7).
The rear impact rubber stops (not shown) are profiled to continue the streamlining to the furthest point rearward on the trailer. They also act to spread impact loads over a greater area when transmitted to the trailer rear frame. This will decrease impact damage at the rear.
The overall tapering effect reduces the rear-projected area and thus drag by virtue of reducing the surfaces acted upon by the base or wake drag of the vehicle.
The overhang 44 of the tapered rear end compared with the roller shutter 46 in it's closed position (see fig 8), is designed to take advantage of an aerodynamic cavity effect. This effect manipulates vortex roll-up from the trailing edge of the vehicle and increases wake or base pressure, thus reducing drag.
In order to minimise, and preferably ensure no premature flow separation from the roof surface, specifically designed vortex generators 48 are employed (see figure 6). The vortex generators create opposing, twin vortices which mix fast and slow air close to the roof surface. This helps the boundary layer and thus general airflow stay attached to the trailer roof. The vortex generators are a basic wishbone shape in plan view. The side view profile of the vortex generators is specific to the cambered surface they sit upon.
The side tapering section camber is less than the roof camber and is determined by the mechanical packaging requirements of the structural design of the rear upright posts defining the end of the trailer as illustrated by fig 7b. Mirrors
Referring to Figures 9 onwards, a pair of wing mirrors 120 according to an embodiment of the invention are mounted one either side of the tractor cab of an articulated heavy goods vehicle ("truck"). The trucks windscreen 122 and side windows 124 are separated by vertically extending 'A'-pillars 126 which, as can be seen in the drawings, are sharply radiused in horizontal cross-section.
Looking at one of the wing mirrors 120 in more detail (the other is identical, save from being oppositely handed), a housing component 130, which forms the main body of the wing mirror, supports and houses the mirror 132 itself. The orientation of the mirror within the housing can be adjusted between limits to give the driver of the truck the desired view. Upper and lower support arms 134 mount the wing mirror to the truck cab adjacent its respective 'A'-pillar 126.
The outer surface of the housing 130 (i.e. the surface facing away from the TV-pillar) has a shape derived from the shape of the 'A'-pillar 126, especially the cross-sectional shape. However, the radius of curvature of this surface is greater, preferably at least 1.3 times the approximated radius of the A'-pillar.
The outer surface of the housing 130 is spaced from the 'A'-pillar 126 and its location is a function of maximising span or chord length within the eye-sight constraints for the driver.
As can be seen, the support arms 134 form extensions of the outer surface of the mirror housing 130. They have a thin, plate form and curve in gently to respective upper and lower mounting points on the cab, above and below the 'A'-pillar 126. They are shaped to maximise the effective length of the wing mirror without impeding the driver's view past the wing mirror to any significant extent. Experimental Results
Cab and Trailer Features
In tests using a 1/3 scale model, the components described above fitted to the cab (tractor unit) have been shown to provide a significant reduction in overall drag of about 16-20% wind-averaged.
The components fitted to the trailer unit have been shown to independently provide a significant reduction in overall drag of about 20-25% wind-averaged.
In combination, a vehicle fitted with both the cab and trailer components would be expected to return a reduction in Cd of about 40% wind-averaged in comparison with a standard cab/trailer combination, equating to a very significant fuel saving, particularly across a large fleet of vehicles.
Mirrors
Similarly, in tests using a 1/3 scale model, the wing mirrors described above have been shown to provide a significant improvement in overall drag compared with a truck fitted with conventional wing mirrors. Indeed, as illustrated by the results in the table below, use of these wing mirrors can offer an improvement over running the truck without wing mirrors at all.
Figure imgf000027_0001
This improvement in drag factor (Cd) of over 4.5%, brought about by using wing mirrors according to an embodiment ofthe present invention, is likely to give a fuel saving in the region of about 1.5 to 2% which across a large fleet of trucks travelling long distances equates to a substantial annual cost saving.

Claims

Claims:
1. A roof fairing for a vehicle, the vehicle having a cab and a rear container part that protrudes upwardly above the cab, the roof fairing comprising a curved surface that when installed extends from a front end adjacent a forward edge of the cab roof to a rear end adjacent a forward edge of the roof of the container part, the curvature of the surface being designed to result in a progressive increase in the pressure gradient of air flowing over the surface from its front end to its rear end.
2. A roof fairing according to claim 1 , wherein the surface of the fairing has an elliptical curvature to achieve the desired pressure gradient profile.
3. A roof fairing according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the fairing surface is substantially parallel to the adjacent surface of the container part.
4. A collar for a vehicle, the vehicle having a cab and a rear container part, when installed, the collar extending from the rear of the cab sides towards the trailer and terminating adjacent the respective forward end of the container part side walls, an outer surface of the collar at its trailing edge being substantially in the plane of the respective container side wall.
5. A collar according to claim 5, wherein the spacing between the trailing edge of the collar and the front end of the container part when installed is no more than 500mm.
6. A lower airdam for a cab unit of a vehicle, when installed, the airdam extending across the width of the front, bottom edge of the cab unit and extends further forward at its centre than at its outer ends.
7. An airdam according to claim 6, wherein the airdam is profiled to extend closer to the ground at its centre than at its ends.
8. A cab chassis fairing for the tractor unit of an articulated vehicle, the fairing comprising a substantially flat panel extending along a side of the tractor unit adjacent the ground, the lower edge of the panel being curved such that the ground clearance is greater towards the centre of the panel.
9. A cab chassis fairing for the tractor unit of an articulated vehicle, the fairing comprising a substantially flat panel extending along a side of the tractor unit adjacent the ground, the panel having one or more openings for venting air from beneath the trailer.
10. A fairing according to claim 9, wherein the openings are located forward of and close to the rear wheels of the tractor unit.
1 1.A fairing according to any one of claims 8 to 10, which is adapted to cover the rear wheels of the tractor unit.
12. A fairing according to claim 11 , comprising one or more brake cooling openings.
13. A side skirt for a vehicle trailer, the side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground, and further comprising one or more of: a) a lower edge of the panel curved such that the ground clearance is greater towards the centre of the panel; b) one or more openings in the panel for venting air from beneath the trailer; c) a laterally extending wall adjacent a wheel or wheels of the trailer; d) a lateral wall at the front end of the skirt, the trailer being for an articulated vehicle and the lateral wall profiled in plan view substantially as an arc centred on the axis about which the trailer articulates; and e) a rear end of the side skirt tapering inwardly towards the centre of the trailer.
14. A side skirt according to claim 13 comprising feature c), wherein the side skirt comprises a pair of said laterally extending walls, one to the front and one to the rear of the trailer wheel or wheels.
15. A side skirt according to claim 14, wherein the walls extend parallel to the wheel axles.
16. A side skirt according to claim 14 or claim 15, wherein at least one of the walls extends the full width of the wheel or wheels that it is adjacent to.
17. A side skirt according to claim 13 comprising feature e), wherein the tapering surface of the side skirt is curved.
18. A trailer having a pair of side skirts, one on either side of the trailer, each side skirt comprising a substantially flat panel extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground and comprising a lateral wall at its front end, wherein the lateral walls extend in towards the centre of the trailer to leave a gap between them that defines a channel, the width of which is selected to control airflow underneath the trailer.
19. A side skirt for a trailer of an articulated vehicle, the side skirt comprising substantially flat panels extending along the lower side of the trailer adjacent the ground to the front and rear of the wheels of the trailer, the side skirt further comprising a cover for the trailer wheels comprising a substantially flat panel arranged to provide a substantially continuous surface along the lower side of the trailer over the wheels.
20. A side skirt according to claim 19, wherein the wheel cover panels are arranged to allow visual inspection of the wheel nuts and tyre tread within a confined space at the trailer side.
21.A side skirt according to claim 19 or claim 20, wherein the wheel cover panels have one or more brake cooling openings to allow brake heat to dissipate.
22. A vehicle trailer comprising a rear crash bar that is aerodynamically shrouded.
23. A vehicle trailer having at least one bogey, the trailer further comprising a bogey axle shroud mounted upstream of the bogey and arranged to deflect air around the bogey.
24. A vehicle trailer according to claim 23, wherein the bogey shroud extends across substantially the whole width of the trailer.
25. A vehicle trailer according to claim 23 or 24, wherein the bogey shroud has the general form of the bow of a boat, with a central point that extends further forward than its edges.
26. A vehicle trailer comprising side walls and a roof, wherein: a) a rear portion of the trailer roof curves downwardly towards the rear of the trailer; and / or b) rear end portions of the trailer side walls curve inwardly towards the rear of the trailer.
27. A vehicle trailer according to claim 26, wherein the trailer roof is curved and the curvature of the trailer roof commences at least one metre from the rear end of the trailer.
28. A vehicle trailer according to claim 26 or claim 27, wherein the trailer side walls are curved and the curvature of the side walls commences at least
300 millimetres from the rear end of the trailer.
29. A vehicle trailer according to any one of claims 26 to 28, comprising a buffer mounted to the rear of the trailer, the outer surface of the buffer being preferably profiled to continue the taper of the roof and/or side wall surfaces.
30. A vehicle trailer according to any one of claims 26 to 29, comprising vortex generators formed on the tapering surface of the roof and/or side walls.
31.A vehicle trailer comprising side walls, a floor and a roof, rear end portions of the trailer roof, floor and side walls extending rearwardly beyond a closure means at the rear end of the trailer.
32. A cab unit for a vehicle, the cab unit features in accordance with one or more of claims 1 to 12.
33. A vehicle trailer comprising features in accordance with one or more of claims 13 to 31.
34. A vehicle having a cab unit according to claim 32.
35. A vehicle having a trailer according to claim 33.
36. A vehicle having a cab unit according to claim 32 and a trailer according to claim 33.
37. A wing mirror for a vehicle, the wing mirror comprising a housing to support the mirror and means for mounting the housing adjacent the vehicle's 'A'-pillar, the housing having an outer surface that has a shape derived from the outwardly facing surface of the 'A'-pillar but that has a radius of curvature greater than that of the 'A'-pillar.
38. A wing mirror according to claim 37, wherein the means for mounting the wing mirror housing on the vehicle are one or more support arms which are themselves shaped to minimise drag.
39. A wing mirror according to claim 37 or claim 38, additionally comprising an 'A'-pillar deflector.
PCT/GB2004/000023 2003-01-08 2004-01-08 Improving fuel consumption in large road-going vehicles Ceased WO2004062953A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0300413.2 2003-01-08
GB0300413A GB0300413D0 (en) 2003-01-08 2003-01-08 Improving fuel consumption in large road-going vehicles
GB0300412A GB0300412D0 (en) 2003-01-08 2003-01-08 Improving fuel consumption in large road-going vehicles
GB0300412.4 2003-01-08
GB0318235.9 2003-08-04
GB0318235A GB0318235D0 (en) 2003-08-04 2003-08-04 Improving fuel consumption in large road-going vehicles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004062953A2 true WO2004062953A2 (en) 2004-07-29
WO2004062953A3 WO2004062953A3 (en) 2004-09-16

Family

ID=32718561

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2004/000023 Ceased WO2004062953A2 (en) 2003-01-08 2004-01-08 Improving fuel consumption in large road-going vehicles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2004062953A2 (en)

Cited By (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2900898A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2007-11-16 Fabrice Paille Cabin aerodynamic mold for e.g. road motor vehicle, has front zone extending to vertical plane and describing arc of circle on vertical plane, where shape of arc of circle is different from shape of leakage path
EP1870322A1 (en) * 2006-06-20 2007-12-26 Iveco S.p.A. System for optimizing the aerodynamics of the underside of a semi-trailer of an articulated industrial or commercial vehicle
NL1034363C2 (en) * 2007-08-13 2009-02-16 Gandert Marcel Rita Van Raemdonck Flow conductor for use in aerodynamic device for vehicle e.g. lorry, has thickened portions formed in front edge, and streamlined outer contours in cross section that is transverse to front edge
US7497502B2 (en) 2006-06-19 2009-03-03 Solus Solutions And Technologies, Llc Mini skirt aerodynamic fairing device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles
WO2009055526A3 (en) * 2007-10-23 2009-06-04 L Livermore Nat Security Llc Vehicle underbody fairing
US7585015B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2009-09-08 Solus Solutions And Technologies, Llc Frame extension device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles
US20110068605A1 (en) * 2009-09-23 2011-03-24 Aerodynamic Trailer Systems, Llc Undercarriage fairing
US8007030B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2011-08-30 Richard Wood Frame extension device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles
GB2474379B (en) * 2007-04-16 2011-11-30 Don Bur Improvements in or relating to trailers or containers
GB2498811A (en) * 2012-01-30 2013-07-31 Wirth Res Ltd Drag reduction device and a vehicle comprising the device
WO2013174410A1 (en) * 2012-05-22 2013-11-28 Daimler Ag Wind-guiding device
US9004575B2 (en) 2010-08-03 2015-04-14 Gary Alan Grandominico Aerodynamic skirt assembly
WO2017059023A1 (en) * 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US9751573B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2017-09-05 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
WO2018009708A1 (en) * 2016-07-08 2018-01-11 Dynamic Research, Inc. Improvements to a soft collision partner (aka soft car) used in system for testing crash avoidance technologies
EP3284662A1 (en) * 2016-08-15 2018-02-21 Andrew Bacon Aerodynamic panel for a road haulage trailer
US10189514B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2019-01-29 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US10252755B2 (en) 2012-11-01 2019-04-09 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic system and adjustable fairings
WO2019169300A1 (en) * 2018-03-02 2019-09-06 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
WO2019168548A1 (en) * 2018-03-02 2019-09-06 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
US10654529B2 (en) 2017-06-24 2020-05-19 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic systems and fairings with fairing caps
WO2020180707A1 (en) * 2019-03-01 2020-09-10 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly for autonomous vehicles
US10882571B2 (en) 2017-07-30 2021-01-05 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Rotatable aerodynamic fairing system
IT201900024096A1 (en) * 2019-12-16 2021-06-16 Iveco Spa VEHICLE INCLUDING AN IMPROVED AERODYNAMIC RESISTANCE REDUCTION SYSTEM
US11110974B2 (en) 2015-02-27 2021-09-07 Daimler Ag Fairing assembly for at least one axle of a commercial vehicle
US11247736B2 (en) 2018-03-02 2022-02-15 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing corner for improved aerodynamic performance
US11332203B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2022-05-17 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US11352075B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2022-06-07 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US11352073B2 (en) 2017-07-12 2022-06-07 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic toolbox assembly
US11639205B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2023-05-02 Strehl, Llc Methods and apparatus for a strut assembly for an aerodynamic trucking system
US11679823B2 (en) 2021-01-06 2023-06-20 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Retractable aerodynamic side skirts for vehicles
US11713013B2 (en) 2020-07-09 2023-08-01 Fontaine Commercial Trailer, Inc. Side underride guard assembly for a trailer
US11767064B2 (en) 2021-01-12 2023-09-26 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Spring-biased mud flap hanger with improved pivoting motion guidance
US11772718B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2023-10-03 Richard P. Senatro Aerodynamic trucking systems
US11932060B2 (en) 2016-11-04 2024-03-19 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Chassis mounted energy extraction and delivery system
US12534020B2 (en) 2022-10-31 2026-01-27 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with lidar for autonomous vehicles

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4210354A (en) * 1978-02-06 1980-07-01 Canning Robert B Aerodynamic drag-reducing shield for mounting on the front of a cargo carrying compartment of a road vehicle
FR2459172A1 (en) * 1979-06-15 1981-01-09 Laudet Jacques Air deflector for semi trailer vehicle - is fitted on cab roof and extends back to trailer roof
US4746160A (en) * 1986-06-30 1988-05-24 Wiesemeyer Robert L Streamlined truck with semitrailer
US4932716A (en) * 1988-09-15 1990-06-12 Paccar Inc. Highway truck-tractor
GB2271323B (en) * 1989-11-14 1994-11-09 Ricardo A S & A Ltd Vehicle aerodynamics
US5058945A (en) * 1990-06-08 1991-10-22 Elliott Sr Morris C Long-haul vehicle streamline apparatus
US5498059A (en) * 1994-09-28 1996-03-12 Switlik; Stanley Apparatus for reducing drag
JP2001030964A (en) * 1999-07-23 2001-02-06 Hino Motors Ltd Truck bed structure

Cited By (75)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7585015B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2009-09-08 Solus Solutions And Technologies, Llc Frame extension device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles
US8007030B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2011-08-30 Richard Wood Frame extension device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles
FR2900898A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2007-11-16 Fabrice Paille Cabin aerodynamic mold for e.g. road motor vehicle, has front zone extending to vertical plane and describing arc of circle on vertical plane, where shape of arc of circle is different from shape of leakage path
US7497502B2 (en) 2006-06-19 2009-03-03 Solus Solutions And Technologies, Llc Mini skirt aerodynamic fairing device for reducing the aerodynamic drag of ground vehicles
EP1870322A1 (en) * 2006-06-20 2007-12-26 Iveco S.p.A. System for optimizing the aerodynamics of the underside of a semi-trailer of an articulated industrial or commercial vehicle
GB2474379B (en) * 2007-04-16 2011-11-30 Don Bur Improvements in or relating to trailers or containers
WO2009022904A1 (en) * 2007-08-13 2009-02-19 Technische Universiteit Delft Side skirt for a pulled vehicle
US8616616B2 (en) 2007-08-13 2013-12-31 Ephicas Patents Bvba Side skirt for a pulled vehicle
NL1034363C2 (en) * 2007-08-13 2009-02-16 Gandert Marcel Rita Van Raemdonck Flow conductor for use in aerodynamic device for vehicle e.g. lorry, has thickened portions formed in front edge, and streamlined outer contours in cross section that is transverse to front edge
AU2008287602B2 (en) * 2007-08-13 2013-10-03 Wabco Europe Bvba Flow conductor for use as a side skirt
WO2009055526A3 (en) * 2007-10-23 2009-06-04 L Livermore Nat Security Llc Vehicle underbody fairing
US20110068605A1 (en) * 2009-09-23 2011-03-24 Aerodynamic Trailer Systems, Llc Undercarriage fairing
US8276972B2 (en) * 2009-09-23 2012-10-02 Aerodynamic Trailer Systems, Llc Undercarriage fairing
US11352075B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2022-06-07 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US9975583B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2018-05-22 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US10583873B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2020-03-10 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US10829168B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2020-11-10 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US11299216B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2022-04-12 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US9751573B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2017-09-05 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US11772718B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2023-10-03 Richard P. Senatro Aerodynamic trucking systems
US11332203B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2022-05-17 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US11639205B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2023-05-02 Strehl, Llc Methods and apparatus for a strut assembly for an aerodynamic trucking system
US20190118871A1 (en) * 2010-05-27 2019-04-25 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US10189514B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2019-01-29 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
US9573636B2 (en) 2010-08-03 2017-02-21 Ridge Corporation Aerodynamic skirt assembly
US9004575B2 (en) 2010-08-03 2015-04-14 Gary Alan Grandominico Aerodynamic skirt assembly
GB2498811A (en) * 2012-01-30 2013-07-31 Wirth Res Ltd Drag reduction device and a vehicle comprising the device
WO2013174410A1 (en) * 2012-05-22 2013-11-28 Daimler Ag Wind-guiding device
US10710649B2 (en) 2012-11-01 2020-07-14 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic system and adjustable fairings
US10252755B2 (en) 2012-11-01 2019-04-09 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic system and adjustable fairings
US10293872B2 (en) 2012-11-01 2019-05-21 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic system and adjustable fairings
US11667338B2 (en) 2012-11-01 2023-06-06 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic system and adjustable fairings
US11110974B2 (en) 2015-02-27 2021-09-07 Daimler Ag Fairing assembly for at least one axle of a commercial vehicle
WO2017059023A1 (en) * 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 Strehl, Llc Aerodynamic trucking systems
CN112224292A (en) * 2015-09-29 2021-01-15 斯特列尔有限责任公司 Aerodynamic trucking system
WO2018009708A1 (en) * 2016-07-08 2018-01-11 Dynamic Research, Inc. Improvements to a soft collision partner (aka soft car) used in system for testing crash avoidance technologies
US10697856B2 (en) 2016-07-08 2020-06-30 Dynamic Research Inc. To a soft collision partner (aka soft car) used in system for testing crash avoidance technologies
GB2552961B (en) * 2016-08-15 2019-03-27 Bacon Andy Aerodynamic panel for a road haulage trailer
EP3284662A1 (en) * 2016-08-15 2018-02-21 Andrew Bacon Aerodynamic panel for a road haulage trailer
GB2552961A (en) * 2016-08-15 2018-02-21 Bacon Andy Aerodynamic panel for a road haulage trailer
US11932060B2 (en) 2016-11-04 2024-03-19 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Chassis mounted energy extraction and delivery system
US10654529B2 (en) 2017-06-24 2020-05-19 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic systems and fairings with fairing caps
US11254373B2 (en) 2017-06-24 2022-02-22 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic systems and fairings with fairing caps
US11352073B2 (en) 2017-07-12 2022-06-07 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Aerodynamic toolbox assembly
US10882571B2 (en) 2017-07-30 2021-01-05 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Rotatable aerodynamic fairing system
US11273877B2 (en) 2017-07-30 2022-03-15 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Rotatable aerodynamic fairing system
US11492053B2 (en) 2017-07-30 2022-11-08 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Rotatable aerodynamic fairing system
US11247736B2 (en) 2018-03-02 2022-02-15 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing corner for improved aerodynamic performance
WO2019169300A1 (en) * 2018-03-02 2019-09-06 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
US11325661B2 (en) 2018-03-02 2022-05-10 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
WO2019168545A1 (en) * 2018-03-02 2019-09-06 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
US11292536B2 (en) 2018-03-02 2022-04-05 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
WO2019168548A1 (en) * 2018-03-02 2019-09-06 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
AU2019226575B2 (en) * 2018-03-02 2024-06-06 Trailer Aerodynamics Llc Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
WO2019169311A1 (en) * 2018-03-02 2019-09-06 Compagnie Generale Des Etablissements Michelin Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
US12441247B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-10-14 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly for autonomous vehicles
WO2020180707A1 (en) * 2019-03-01 2020-09-10 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly for autonomous vehicles
US12496969B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-12-16 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with lidar and radar for autonomous vehicles
US12485817B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-12-02 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with radar for autonomous vehicles
US12466321B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-11-11 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with lidar for autonomous vehicles
US12420711B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-09-23 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with radar for autonomous vehicles
US12427921B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-09-30 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with radar for autonomous vehicles
US12434633B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-10-07 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with lidar for autonomous vehicles
US12434631B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-10-07 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly for autonomous vehicles
US12466322B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-11-11 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly for autonomous vehicles
US12441246B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-10-14 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with radar for autonomous vehicles
US12454224B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-10-28 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with lidar for autonomous vehicles
US12454223B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-10-28 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with lidar for autonomous vehicles
US12459436B2 (en) 2019-03-01 2025-11-04 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with lidar for autonomous vehicles
IT201900024096A1 (en) * 2019-12-16 2021-06-16 Iveco Spa VEHICLE INCLUDING AN IMPROVED AERODYNAMIC RESISTANCE REDUCTION SYSTEM
US11713013B2 (en) 2020-07-09 2023-08-01 Fontaine Commercial Trailer, Inc. Side underride guard assembly for a trailer
US11679823B2 (en) 2021-01-06 2023-06-20 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Retractable aerodynamic side skirts for vehicles
US11767064B2 (en) 2021-01-12 2023-09-26 FlowBelow Aero, Inc. Spring-biased mud flap hanger with improved pivoting motion guidance
US12534020B2 (en) 2022-10-31 2026-01-27 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with lidar for autonomous vehicles
US12539813B2 (en) 2022-10-31 2026-02-03 Kodiak Robotics, Inc. Sensor assembly with radar for autonomous vehicles

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2004062953A3 (en) 2004-09-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2004062953A2 (en) Improving fuel consumption in large road-going vehicles
JP5584866B2 (en) Side skirt of towed vehicle
US8251436B2 (en) Devices and methods for reducing vehicle drag
EP3759010B1 (en) Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
US4640541A (en) Under-trailer air deflector
CA2944833C (en) Improvements in the fuel efficiency of road vehicles
EP2809568B1 (en) Drag reduction device and a vehicle comprising the device
US20110204677A1 (en) Dam skirt aerodynamic fairing device
US20120169085A1 (en) Aerodynamic package for an automotive vehicle
US20110272963A1 (en) Devices and Methods for Reducing Vehicle Drag
US4511170A (en) Aerodynamic device for land vehicles
JPH0631014B2 (en) Aerodynamic vehicle
US11623700B2 (en) Multi-panel skirt system for cargo enclosures
US20160339972A1 (en) Streamlining stabilizers for the undersides of vehicles
US20120261946A1 (en) Aerodynamic vehicle aid
GB2511871A (en) Improvements in the fuel efficiency of road vehicles
NZ565720A (en) Aerodynamic vehicle aid
WO2019168545A1 (en) Trailer fairing and system for improved aerodynamic performance
EP3147184B1 (en) Aerodynamic vehicle structure

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase