[go: up one dir, main page]

WO2000059377A1 - Appareil, systeme et methode de detection de neuropathies peripheriques - Google Patents

Appareil, systeme et methode de detection de neuropathies peripheriques Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000059377A1
WO2000059377A1 PCT/US2000/009152 US0009152W WO0059377A1 WO 2000059377 A1 WO2000059377 A1 WO 2000059377A1 US 0009152 W US0009152 W US 0009152W WO 0059377 A1 WO0059377 A1 WO 0059377A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
rod
amplitude
vibration
vibratory
vibratory device
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2000/009152
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
John Lacourse
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of New Hampshire
Biotherapeutic Devices Inc
Original Assignee
University of New Hampshire
Biotherapeutic Devices Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of New Hampshire, Biotherapeutic Devices Inc filed Critical University of New Hampshire
Priority to AU40762/00A priority Critical patent/AU4076200A/en
Publication of WO2000059377A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000059377A1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/48—Other medical applications
    • A61B5/4824—Touch or pain perception evaluation
    • A61B5/4827—Touch or pain perception evaluation assessing touch sensitivity, e.g. for evaluation of pain threshold
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/0048—Detecting, measuring or recording by applying mechanical forces or stimuli
    • A61B5/0051—Detecting, measuring or recording by applying mechanical forces or stimuli by applying vibrations

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to an apparatus for detecting sensory deficits in peripheral nerves and, in particular, to an apparatus for detecting sensory deficits associated with the median and ulnar nerves in the fingers, or other parts of the body .
  • the effectiveness of the vibratory tests is dependent on many test parameters, such as vibrating frequency, dimensions of a vibrating rod contact area, a rod contact force on finger pulp, the gap formed between the rod and a surround, the shape of the surround, and the force exerted upon the surround.
  • test parameters such as vibrating frequency, dimensions of a vibrating rod contact area, a rod contact force on finger pulp, the gap formed between the rod and a surround, the shape of the surround, and the force exerted upon the surround.
  • SA Slowly adapting units
  • SAI Merkel discs
  • SAII Ruffini endings
  • the stimulus characteristics of the FAI and FAII units are influenced by conditions of measurement such as contact area, contact force, surround, vibration frequency, and contact proximity relative to the depth of the rod.
  • Harada and Griffin found that FAII units were highly susceptible to temperature of the finger pulp, contact pressure on the vibrating rod, mood, and somewhat sensitive to the surround, while the FAI units were primarily sensitive to temperature and the surround.
  • longitudinal studies have found that vibration thresholds vary significantly from day to day when using FAII units for measurement. See White et al. "Vibrometry testing for carpal tunnel syndrome: a longitudinal study of daily variations”. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, Vol. 75, pp. 25-28, 1994.
  • United States Patent 5,230,345 issued to Curran et al., describes a system and method for detecting carpal tunnel syndrome in a patient utilizing a vibratory waveform having a discrete frequency and a variable amplitude.
  • the system includes control circuitry for generating an electrical signal having the discrete frequency, specifically 60 Hz, and a computer, including memory for controlling the circuitry to vary the amplitude of the electrical signal and to generate associated amplitude data for storage in the memory.
  • the system includes a speaker for converting the signal into the vibratory waveform. A finger of the patient rests directly on the cone of the speaker so that the vibratory waveform is applied directly to the finger.
  • United States Patent 5,673,703, issued to Fisher et al. describes an apparatus for automatic testing of vibrotactile responses of a patient.
  • a general -purpose computer functions to control the operation of the system and to record and store the patient's responses. Indentations and vibrations are produced by off-axis rotation of a stimulation probe. A frequency- modulated signal generated by the computer is used to control a motor, which drives the stimulation probe.
  • This apparatus also falls short as it requires a complex stimulus probe. This complexity increases the possibility of calibration problems and, accordingly, degrades testing reliability.
  • United States Patent 5,381,805 issued to Tuckett et al.
  • United States Patent 5,022,407 issued to Horch et al.
  • the automatic apparati require complex sets of measurements to be taken to provide information such as patient's response to thermal stimuli, response to touch, response to vibration, response to skin pricking, and response to Two-Point Discrimination tests.
  • the apparati then take this information into account when calculating their results.
  • these systems are relatively costly.
  • the use of the results of multiple tests makes these systems prone to diagnostic abnormalities due to the compounding of the calibration errors inherent in each test. Such compounding of errors decreases the overall reliability of the test results obtained from the system.
  • the invention is a screening apparatus, a screening system, and a method of screening for peripheral neuropathies.
  • the screening apparatus includes a surface having an opening therethrough, a surround disposed about the opening, and a rod with a specified contact area disposed within said opening for contact with the pulp of a finger.
  • the rod and surround are each dimensioned such that principally Meissner corpuscles are stimulated.
  • a vibratory device is attached to the rod and vibrates the rod at a single frequency within a predetermined frequency range, again such that primarily Meissner corpuscles are stimulated by the rod.
  • an amplitude modulating device is in communication with the vibratory device for controlling the vibratory device such that an amplitude of vibration of the vibratory device is incrementally increased.
  • a user places a finger over the surround such that it rests upon the rod, the amplitude modulating device controls the vibratory device to induce vibration at the predetermined frequency, and the amplitude modulating device incrementally increases the amplitude of vibration of the vibratory device until the Meissner corpuscles are stimulated, causing the vibration to be felt by the finger.
  • the preferred apparatus includes a pressure sensor for sensing a pressure exerted by the finger upon the surround to ensure that pressure applied to the finger is within an acceptable range, a means for ensuring continuous contact with the pulp of the finger and the rod, means for adjusting amplitude according to compliance of the skin on the fingertip, and an internal calibration system for ensuring test reliability.
  • the preferred vibratory device is a piezoelectric actuator that vibrates the rod at a single frequency within a frequency range of between about 20 Hz and about 50 Hz, where the preferred frequency is 40 Hz.
  • the preferred amplitude modulating device is an piezoelectric bimorph driver circuit that is controlled by a personal computer.
  • the preferred rod has a tip having a flat circular shape and a maximum cross sectional area of about 0.008 square centimeters.
  • the system of the present invention includes a housing with a top surface through which a surround and an opening are disposed.
  • a rod is disposed within the opening in the housing for contact with the finger pulp.
  • a vibratory device is attached to the rod for vibrating the rod at a single frequency within a predetermined frequency range such that principally Meissner corpuscles are stimulated by the rod.
  • An amplitude modulating device mounted within the housing, is in communication with the vibratory device and controls displacement by the vibratory device.
  • a computer having a storage medium and a user input is connected to the amplitude modulating device via an input/output.
  • the computer is programmed to control the output to the amplitude modulating device such that, once contact between the rod and finger pulp is assured and pressure is found not to exceed an upper threshold, an amplitude of vibration of the vibratory device is incrementally increased.
  • the computer is programmed to store a value corresponding to the amplitude of vibration in the storage medium upon receipt of an input signal from the user input.
  • the preferred system runs a self check to insure test reliability.
  • a user places a hand upon the top surface of the housing such that a finger is disposed upon the rod and the system verifies that contact has been made and that a predetermined maximum force has not been exceeded.
  • This maximum force is chosen to limit the stimulation of Pacinian corpuscles, which are sensitive to contact pressure.
  • the computer then sends an output to the amplitude modulating device to control the vibratory device such that the vibratory device induces the rod to vibrate at the predetermined frequency, with the displacement of the rod adjusted based upon the compliance of the skin of the fingertip.
  • the amplitude modulating device then incrementally increases the amplitude of vibration of the vibratory device until the Meissner corpuscles are stimulated, causing the vibration to be felt by the finger, and the user manipulates the user input such that an input signal is sent to the computer causing the computer to store a value in the storage medium corresponding to the amplitude of vibration when the vibration was felt.
  • the time and amount of each incremental increase is randomized to prevent a user from circumventing the test.
  • FIG. 1 is a side view schematic diagram of portions of one embodiment of the screening apparatus of the present invention with the hand of a user disposed upon the device in a screening position.
  • FIG. 2 is a side view of one embodiment of the rod of the screening apparatus of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a side view of a preferred rod of the screening apparatus of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a side view schematic diagram of portions of the preferred screening apparatus of the present invention with the hand of a user disposed upon the device in a screening position.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic view of one embodiment of the screening system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a top view of the preferred housing of the apparatus and system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a side view of the housing of FIG. 4.
  • FIG. 8 is an exemplary graph showing the use of the statistical data in the method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary graph of tuning curves showing sensory response thresholds relative to stimulus intensity and stimulus frequency for Meissner and Pacinian corpuscles.
  • FIG. 10 is an exemplary graph showing vibrotactile threshold as a function of frequency for a range of contact areas.
  • the screening apparatus 10 includes a vibratory assembly 12, an amplitude-modulating device 14 in communication with the vibratory assembly 12 and a surface 16 through which a surround 18 and opening 19 are disposed.
  • the vibratory assembly 12 includes a rod 20 that is attached to a vibratory device 22.
  • the rod 20 extends through the opening 18 and is dimensioned for contact with the pulp of the finger 24 of the user such that primarily Meissner corpuscles are stimulated.
  • the vibratory device 22 is adapted to vibrate the rod 20 at a single frequency within a predetermined frequency range such that primarily Meissner corpuscles in the finger 24 are stimulated by the rod 20.
  • the amplitude-modulating device 14 is in electrical communication with the vibratory device 22 and controls the vibratory device 22 such that the amplitude of the vibration of the vibratory device 22 is incrementally increased.
  • the device first performs a self check and an internal calibration. A user then places a finger 24 over the opening 19 such that the pulp of the finger 24 rests upon the surround 18, and thus on the force-sensing device 26 housed on the edge of the surround 18. The user provides pressure on the force sensing device 26 until the finger pulp 24 makes contact with the rod 20.
  • the preferred embodiment utilizes a pin diode to confirm that contact has been made between the finger pulp 24 and the rod 20.
  • contact of the finger pulp 24 with the rod 20 is confirmed via the completion of an electrical circuit between the conductive rod 20, the conductive edge of the surround 18 and the finger pulp 24 in contact with both.
  • a lower threshold is established indicating the minimal force acceptable on the force-sensing device 26.
  • the upper threshold for the force sensing device 26 is pre-determined in reference to the lower threshold and is chosen to avoid stimulation of Pacininan corpuscles, which are sensitive to contact pressure.
  • the amplitude-modulating device 14 signals the vibratory device 22 to induce vibration at a predetermined frequency and amplitude.
  • the amplitude-modulating device 14 then incrementally increases the amplitude of vibration of the vibratory device 22 until the Meissner corpuscles in the pulp of the finger 24 are stimulated.
  • the user records, via user input, the amplitude of vibration at the time when it is felt by the finger 24.
  • This value may then be compared to a previous threshold history of the user, alerting the user of the possibility of on-coming peripheral neuropathies via trend changes, and/or if the recorded amplitude of vibration exceeds a predetermined amplitude of vibration that may typically indicate the presence of an existing neuropathy.
  • the phrase "stimulation of primarily Meissner corpuscles” means that the user experiences a sensation from the stimulation of these corpuscles before experiencing a sensation from the stimulation of other mechanoreceptors.
  • FIG. 9 shows an exemplary graph of tuning curves showing sensory response thresholds relative to stimulus intensity and stimulus frequency for Meissner and Pacinian corpuscles.
  • feeling due to stimulation of Meissner corpuscles (referred to as Meissner endings) is maximized at frequencies nearing 30 Hz; i.e. such stimulation may be felt at a minimum amplitude of vibration.
  • Pacinian corpuscles are maximally sensitive at frequencies of about 250 Hz.
  • the present invention utilizes a vibratory device 22 that vibrates the rod 20 at a single frequency within a frequency range of between about 20 Hz and about 50 Hz, with the preferred frequency being 40 Hz.
  • This frequency range has been chosen to specifically target the Meissner corpuscles, while limiting the stimulation of Pacinian corpuscles, and slowly adapting units, such as Merkel discs and Ruffini endings, which are sensitive at frequencies between about 8 and 16 Hz.
  • the preferred vibratory device 22 is a bimorph piezoelectric actuator. This device is preferred over other types of vibratory devices due to its fast response time, low profile and small overall size, high resistance to vibration and shock, and high field reliability. However, it is recognized that other art recognized vibratory devices 22, such as modified speakers, rotary solenoids, and the like, may be utilized to achieve similar results.
  • the rod 20 is also dimensioned to stimulate primarily Meissner corpuscles.
  • FIG. 10 taken from Verillo's paper "CONTACTOR AREA AND THE VIBROTACTILE THRESHOLD", shows a plot of vibrotactile threshold as a function of frequency, displacement, and rod area, in which a gap between the rod and surround is kept constant.
  • small cross-sectional rod contact areas are somewhat less affected by changes in the frequency of stimulation.
  • the rod contact area should be below 0.02 square centimeters and the frequency below about 50 Hz.
  • FIG. 2 shows the rod 20 of the present invention.
  • the rod 20 was designed to fall within the above parameters and, accordingly, has a tip 34 with a contact area of between about 0.005 and about 0.02 square centimeters. This contact area allows the rod 20 to be felt at minimum amplitudes within the range of frequencies at which the rod 20 is vibrated.
  • the tip 34 preferably has a cross sectional contact area of 0.008 square centimeters. This relatively small cross sectional contact area limits the stimulation of the Pacinian corpuscles and, thus, controls the testing volatility inherent in screening methodologies dependent upon such Pacinian stimulation.
  • the rod 20 may be manufactured from a variety of materials and has a tip 34 that may be formed into a plurality of shapes. As shown in FIG. 2, the rod 20 may be cylindrical in cross section and includes a substantially flat tip 34. The preferred rod 20, shown in FIG. 3, also includes a cylindrical top portion 33 that terminates in a substantially flat tip 34. However, the preferred rod 20 includes a conical base portion 37 that extends outward to prevent the rod 20 from bending. It is noted that rods 20 having different tip shapes may also be utilized, provided that the tip 34 includes an edge structure 35 to produce the flutter necessary to stimulate the Meissner corpuscles.
  • the surface 16 and surround 18 may take many forms. However the preferred surface 16 is dimensioned such that the hand is in a neutral position when the screening process is performed. As used herein, a neutral position is defined as when the wrist is up to 7 degrees extended with 0 degrees deviation.
  • the surround 18 has a flat surface and surrounds the opening 19, which is preferably circular in cross section and dimensioned to form an approximately 1mm gap between the edge of the surround 18 and the edge of the vibrating rod 20. This dimensioning of the opening 19 relative to the rod 20 also acts to provide stimulation primarily of the Meissner corpuscles.
  • the amplitude-modulating device 14 may take many forms, but is preferably an electronic amplifier controlled by a computer to incrementally increase the amplitude of vibration of the rod 20.
  • the screening apparatus 10 may include a pressure sensor 26 that is adapted to sense the pressure exerted by the finger 24 on the surround and the rod 20.
  • the preferred pressure sensor 26, shown in FIG. 4 is a force sensing resistor such as those sold by Interlink.
  • the sensor 26 is in communication with an indicator 28 and sends a signal to the indicator 28 when the pressure exerted by the finger 24 falls within, or outside, of a predetermined range of acceptable testing pressures.
  • This predetermined range is based, primarily, upon a minimal pressure required to establish contact between the rod 20 and the finger, the maximum allowable pressure that may be exerted upon the vibratory device 22, and maximum allowable pressure that may be exerted by the finger pulp on the surround in order to generate reliable sensitivity measures while not causing skin stress.
  • this force is between 0 and 1.1 ounces.
  • this force range may vary depending upon the particular vibratory device 22 that is utilized.
  • the indicator 28 of FIG. 1 is a light that is illuminated when the finger pressure is within the range of acceptable testing pressures. However, in other embodiments, the indicator 28 is a light or an LED that is illuminated when the finger pressure is outside of the range of acceptable testing pressures, when contact is not made, or when contact is not continuous. In other embodiments, the indicator 28 is a sound generating device, such as a speaker, buzzer, bell, that produces an audible sound when the pressure is either within or outside of the range of acceptable testing pressures, when contact is not made with the rod 20, or when contact with the rod 20 is not continuous.
  • a sound generating device such as a speaker, buzzer, bell
  • the indicator 28 is eliminated and the sensor sends a signal to a computer (not shown) which may be programmed to alert a user, or to discard the test results, when the testing pressure is above a maximum testing pressure, when contact is not made, or when contact is broken.
  • a computer not shown
  • the preferred apparatus 10 includes a housing 16 and a vibratory device 22, and utilizes a force sensing resistor as the pressure sensor 26.
  • the preferred apparatus 10 also includes a means for ensuring continuous contact between the finger pulp and the rod, and an internal calibration system 41 for insuring that the test data is not corrupted by errors in the apparatus 10.
  • the preferred means for ensuring continuous contact between the finger pulp and rod 20 includes a pin diode 43 and a reflector 45 disposed upon the bottom of the vibratory device 22.
  • the pin diode 43 is disposed in a predetermined position such that it is perpendicular to the reflector 45 when there is no downward force applied upon the rod 20.
  • the pin diode 43 emits pulses of light, which reflect off of the reflector 45 and back to the pin diode 43, which captures the reflected light to effectively complete the circuit.
  • the completion of the circuit indicates that the finger is not contacting the rod 20.
  • the vibratory device 22 deflects in response to the load, causing the reflector 45 to move out of perpendicular orientation with the pin diode 43.
  • the pulses of light emitted by the pin diode 43 are scattered and, accordingly, are not reflected back to the pin diode 43 to complete the circuit.
  • the lack of a completed circuit indicates that the finger is contacting the rod 20.
  • the reflector 45 is positioned such that scatter occurs when contact is not made with the rod 20.
  • the placement of the finger pulp upon the rod 20 moves the reflector 45 into perpendicular alignment with the pin diode 43, which captures the reflected light and completes the circuit.
  • the means for ensuring continuous contact between the finger pulp 24 and the rod 20 includes an impedance system.
  • finger contact is sensed throughout the test by completing an electrical circuit between a conductive portion of the rod 20, a conductive portion of the area of the surface surrounding the hole 19, and the finger pulp 24 of a user.
  • the preferred internal calibration system 41 includes means for ensuring that the rod 20 is vibrated at sufficient amplitude, means for ensuring that the rod 20 is maintained in an upright position within the opening 19, and means for ensuring the bimorph piezoelectric actuator is not bent. As shown in FIG.
  • the preferred means for ensuring that the rod 20 is vibrated at sufficient amplitude includes a second pin diode 47 and reflector 49 that combine to measure scatter of reflected light at a point near the base of the vibratory device 22. This scatter is compared to the scatter found by the pin diode 43 and reflector 45 adjacent to the rod 20 to determine whether the piezoelectric actuator is deflecting at the desired amplitude. This allows the system to compensate for variations in fingertip compliance due to heavily callused or unusually soft fingertips, allowing more accurate control of the actual amplitude of vibration under load.
  • the preferred means for insuring that the rod is maintained in an upright position within the opening 19 is a rod 20, such as that shown in FIG. 3, having a wide base portion. As noted above, by widening this base portion, the rod 20 is prevented from bending and, thus, is maintained in an upright position within the opening 19.
  • this function is accomplished by a capacitance sensor.
  • a capacitance sensor operates by sensing the capacitance between the rod 20 and the surround 18. This capacitance is dependent upon the direction and distance between the surround 18 and the rod 20 and, therefore, will change if the rod 20 is disposed a different distance from the surround 18.
  • the screening system 50 includes a housing 54 that includes a top surface 16 having an opening 19 disposed therethrough and an area of said surface 16 surrounding said opening 19.
  • the rod 20 extends through the opening 19 for contact with the pulp of a finger and is attached to the vibratory device (not shown).
  • the electronic amplifier 56 is in communication with the vibratory device and controls the vibratory device.
  • a computer 58 communicates with the electronic amplifier 56 through an input/output port 60 to control the output of the electronic amplifier 56 such that the amplitude of vibration of the vibratory device is adjusted for compliance with the fingertip and is incrementally increased based upon this adjustment.
  • the computer 58 includes the input/output port 60, a storage medium (not shown), and a user input 62.
  • a software program stored within the storage medium, directs the computer to store a value corresponding to the amplitude of vibration upon receipt of an input signal from the user input 62.
  • the preferred screening system 50 operates in a similar fashion to the screening apparatus 10 described with reference to FIGS. 1 - 4.
  • the internal calibration system performs a self-check to insure that the rod 20 is in an upright position, that the bimorph piezoelectric actuator is not bent, and that full displacement is attained.
  • the user disposes a finger over the surround 18 such that the finger pulp contacts the rod 20 and the system verifies that this contact has been made. Once contact has been made, the system verifies that the force upon the rod 20 and surround 18 does not exceed a maximum force and continuously monitors this force to insure that it is below the maximum.
  • the rod 20 is then induced to vibrate by the vibratory device at a single frequency, with amplitude being adjusted for fingertip compliance.
  • the induction of vibration and the subsequent increase in the amplitude of vibration is automated by the computer, which randomizes the modulation of the amplitude of vibration by controlling the output of the electronic amplifier 56 via a control program stored within the storage medium.
  • the computer 58 also eliminates the need to manually record the amplitude of vibration at the time that the user feels the vibration of the rod 20, as is required in some embodiments of the screening apparatus 10. Rather, the user simply manipulates the user input 62 when the vibration is felt and the computer 58 accepts the input signal from the user input 62, determines the amplitude of vibration at the time the input signal is received, and automatically stores the amplitude of vibration within the storage medium. These stored amplitudes of vibration may be tracked over time and statistically manipulated to provide data useful for screening for peripheral neuropathies.
  • the screening system 50 of FIG. 3 includes a computer monitor 64 that may be utilized to display values of the amplitude of vibration recorded by a user, graphs of recorded amplitudes of vibration over time, indications of improper test conditions such as those described with reference to the pressure sensor and indicator of FIG. 1 and pin diode of FIG. 4, improper calibration, lack of contact of the rod with the finger pulp, or any other information that may be useful to the screening process.
  • a touch screen type monitor may also be utilized to serve both as a display and a user input 62.
  • the user input of computer 58 is preferably a standard computer keyboard 62, such as those commonly employed with personal computers. However, as mentioned above, the keyboard user input 62 may be replaced, or augmented by a touch screen type computer monitor.
  • the user input 62 may simply be a mouse button 66 on a computer mouse 52 within which the rod 20 and vibratory device 22 are disposed.
  • the user input 62 may be integrated into the pressure sensor 26, described with reference to the screening apparati of FIGS. 1 and 4. In this embodiment, the user would release the pin 20 upon feeling vibration, causing the pressure sensor 26 to send a signal to the computer 58 indicating that the vibration had been felt.
  • this embodiment is not preferred, as such an arrangement is prone to creating spurious results.
  • the electronic amplifier 56 is shown outside the housing 54 in FIG. 5, the electronic amplifier 56 is preferably disposed within the housing 54 and the input/output 60 extends into the housing 54 where it is connected to the electronic amplifier 56.
  • the input/output 60 is preferably a cable, but may also be any art recognized infrared or radio frequency input/output.
  • the housing 54 is a housing of a working computer mouse 52 that functions both as a screening apparatus and to manipulate the computer 58 during normal operations.
  • the computer mouse 52 may take a number of forms and include a number of different input types.
  • the computer mouse may be a standard two or three button mouse, a mouse with a side mounted rollerball, a mouse with a centrally mounted rollerball, such as the MICROSOFT INTELLIMOUSEO marketed by the Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington, or a track ball type mouse having a roller ball in the center and a plurality of buttons disposed about the roller ball.
  • the computer mouse includes an umbo and a thumb support upon one side of the computer mouse.
  • the umbo is a contoured surface that allows a user's hand to be placed in a neutral position during both screening and during normal use.
  • the surround is disposed through one of the mouse buttons and the rod is adapted to retract when it is not being used for testing purposes. This arrangement allows the hand to remain in the neutral position at all times and helps to prevent the repetitive stresses upon the hands that cause peripheral neuropathies.
  • the preferred housing 54 of the present invention is shown in FIGS. 6 and 7.
  • the preferred housing 54 is not a housing of a working computer mouse, but rather is a molded plastic housing 54 having a top surface 16 that tapers upward from the tail end 74 of the housing 54 to a substantially flat portion 76 through which the opening 19 is disposed.
  • the tapered portion 78 of the top surface 16 is dimensioned to accept the palm of a user's hand such that the hand is in a neutral position during testing.
  • the angle a representing the bend of a user's wrist, should be no more than seven degrees extended.
  • the housing 54 is designed to be used by either a left or a right hand. Disposed through the top surface 16 is the opening 19, bounded by the surround 18.
  • the rod 20 is disposed within the opening 19 and is accessible by the user through the opening 19.
  • the screening apparatus 10 and screening system 50 of the present invention may be utilized in a number of different methods of screening for peripheral neuropathies.
  • the application of vibration at frequencies to stimulate primarily Meissner corpuscles the tracking of trend data over time, the ability to alert a user of the possibility of testing inaccuracies due to problems identified through internal calibration and/or excessive or insufficient force upon the rod, adjustments to the amplitude of vibration based upon fingertip compliance, and the ability to randomize the test process to avoid false results, provide significant improvements over current screening methods.
  • the preferred method involves the use of the screening system 50 in an office environment.
  • the integration of the rod 20 and vibratory device 22 into the housing 54 makes the system easy to integrate into existing work spaces.
  • the computer software within the computer 58 will prompt the worker to screen themselves after a predetermined period of work, at a predetermined time of day, or after a predetermined number of keystrokes. This prompt is important as screening data may vary significantly from tests taken after periods of rest to tests taken after periods of repetitive motion. Once the test has been performed, the screening data is stored in the storage medium of the computer and is compared with data taken previously and with data representing acceptable and unacceptable amplitudes of vibration required before it is felt by the worker.
  • screening data may be plotted to show a trend over time.
  • this data is displayed upon the worker's computer monitor.
  • a warning occurs if the trend shows an increase in the required amplitude above a predetermined baseline for a given period of time.
  • the screening apparatus 10 is disposed upon a factory floor and utilized by workers performing repetitive tasks.
  • a computerized data collection system that authenticates the worker being screened via an employee number, bar coded identification, or the like, and sends data to a central computer system for processing of baseline and trend data.
  • a central screening station that allows workers to privately and anonymously screen themselves.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Pain & Pain Management (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Psychiatry (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
  • User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un appareil (10) de dépistage, un système de dépistage et une méthode de dépistage des neuropathies périphériques. L'appareil de dépistage (10) comprend une surface (16) avec une ouverture (19), une bordure (18) située autour de l'ouverture (19), et une tige (20) comportant une zone de contact déterminée disposée dans cette ouverture pour permettre le contact avec une surface du corps. La tige (20) et l'ouverture (19) sont conçues de manière que les corpuscules de Meissner en particulier soient stimulés. Un appareil vibratoire (22) est relié à la tige (20) et fait vibrer la tige à une fréquence unique dans une plage de fréquence préétablie, de manière que les corpuscules de Meissner soient à nouveau stimulés par la tige. Enfin, l'invention porte sur un dispositif modulateur d'amplitude (14) communiquant avec l'appareil vibratoire (22) afin de réguler ce dernier, de manière que l'amplitude de vibration dudit appareil augmente progressivement. Lors du fonctionnement du dispositif, un utilisateur place une surface du corps sur la bordure de manière qu'elle repose sur la tige (20), le dispositif modulateur d'amplitude (14) régule l'appareil vibratoire (22) afin de produire la vibration à une fréquence préétablie, et ledit dispositif (14) fait progressivement augmenter l'amplitude de vibration de l'appareil vibratoire jusqu'à ce que les corpuscules de Meissner soient stimulés, la vibration étant ainsi perçue par la surface du corps.
PCT/US2000/009152 1999-04-06 2000-04-06 Appareil, systeme et methode de detection de neuropathies peripheriques Ceased WO2000059377A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU40762/00A AU4076200A (en) 1999-04-06 2000-04-06 Apparatus, system, and method for detecting peripheral neuropathies

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12800199P 1999-04-06 1999-04-06
US60/128,001 1999-04-06

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000059377A1 true WO2000059377A1 (fr) 2000-10-12

Family

ID=22433092

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/009152 Ceased WO2000059377A1 (fr) 1999-04-06 2000-04-06 Appareil, systeme et methode de detection de neuropathies peripheriques

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU4076200A (fr)
SA (1) SA00210014B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2000059377A1 (fr)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2005060395A2 (fr) 2003-12-03 2005-07-07 Ajay Gupta, Md Procede et appareil de communication electronique de et diagnostic medical en combinaison pour la detection/le suivi de la neuropathie
WO2006046901A1 (fr) * 2004-10-25 2006-05-04 Vibrosense Dynamics Ab Dispositif de mesure de perception vibrotactile
EP1792567A1 (fr) 2005-12-02 2007-06-06 Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbelliard (UTBM) Appareil de detection du syndrome du canal carpien
EP2312999A4 (fr) * 2008-07-17 2013-01-09 Electronic Products Accessories And Chemicals Llc Dispositif de diagnostic de neuropathies
US8496598B2 (en) 2008-02-05 2013-07-30 Technologia Apparatus for early diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and method and device for acquiring information on the skin sensitivity of a finger of a patient
CN103330546A (zh) * 2013-04-15 2013-10-02 北京工业大学 一种基于嵌入式的数字振动感觉阈值检测仪
EP3081151A1 (fr) * 2015-04-16 2016-10-19 Finn Gilling Christensen Dispositif et procédés permettant de diagnostiquer l'adhd et/ou l'autisme
WO2017034468A1 (fr) * 2015-08-25 2017-03-02 Lara Diagnostics Ab Dispositif et procédé de génération de stimuli sensoriels dans le but d'évaluer une neuropathie
US9610039B2 (en) 2008-07-17 2017-04-04 Prosenex, LLC Hand-held neuroscreening device
WO2017091863A1 (fr) * 2015-12-04 2017-06-08 Newsouth Innovations Pty Limited Motif, procédé et système de stimuli permettant d'évoquer des motifs de suites de potentiels d'action dans des neurones sensoriels tactiles
US20210345951A1 (en) * 2020-05-05 2021-11-11 University Of Utah Research Foundation Neuropathy Screening and Severity Instrument and System
JP2022535532A (ja) * 2019-06-03 2022-08-09 スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー 触知覚障害及び運動制御異常の評価のためのシステム及び方法
WO2022179938A1 (fr) * 2021-02-26 2022-09-01 Vibrosense Dynamics Ab Biomarqueur de prédiction de la neuropathie induite par une chimiothérapie
EP3946016A4 (fr) * 2019-03-27 2022-12-14 Vibrosense Dynamics AB Appareil de mesure de perception vibrotactile et son procédé de préparation comprenant une mesure automatisée de la température

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5022407A (en) 1990-01-24 1991-06-11 Topical Testing, Inc. Apparatus for automated tactile testing
US5230345A (en) 1991-12-30 1993-07-27 Curran Thomas M Method for detecting carpal tunnel syndrome
US5381805A (en) 1990-01-24 1995-01-17 Topical Testing, Inc. Cutaneous testing device for determining nervous system function
US5433211A (en) * 1993-07-19 1995-07-18 National Research Council Of Canada Method and system for identifying vibrotactile perception thresholds of nerve endings with inconsistent subject response rejection
US5673703A (en) 1995-02-17 1997-10-07 Ztech, L.C. Apparatus for automated determination of low frequency tactile thresholds

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5022407A (en) 1990-01-24 1991-06-11 Topical Testing, Inc. Apparatus for automated tactile testing
US5381805A (en) 1990-01-24 1995-01-17 Topical Testing, Inc. Cutaneous testing device for determining nervous system function
US5230345A (en) 1991-12-30 1993-07-27 Curran Thomas M Method for detecting carpal tunnel syndrome
US5433211A (en) * 1993-07-19 1995-07-18 National Research Council Of Canada Method and system for identifying vibrotactile perception thresholds of nerve endings with inconsistent subject response rejection
US5673703A (en) 1995-02-17 1997-10-07 Ztech, L.C. Apparatus for automated determination of low frequency tactile thresholds

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007512900A (ja) * 2003-12-03 2007-05-24 グプタ アジャイ 神経障害を感知／モニタするための方法並びに電子通信及び医療診断装置
EP1697276A4 (fr) * 2003-12-03 2009-04-29 Ajay Gupta Procede et appareil de communication electronique de et diagnostic medical en combinaison pour la detection/le suivi de la neuropathie
WO2005060395A2 (fr) 2003-12-03 2005-07-07 Ajay Gupta, Md Procede et appareil de communication electronique de et diagnostic medical en combinaison pour la detection/le suivi de la neuropathie
WO2006046901A1 (fr) * 2004-10-25 2006-05-04 Vibrosense Dynamics Ab Dispositif de mesure de perception vibrotactile
CN100475130C (zh) * 2004-10-25 2009-04-08 韦博辛斯动力公司 振动触觉感知仪
EP1809165B1 (fr) * 2004-10-25 2017-06-28 Vibrosense Dynamics AB Dispositif de mesure de perception vibrotactile
EP1792567A1 (fr) 2005-12-02 2007-06-06 Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbelliard (UTBM) Appareil de detection du syndrome du canal carpien
FR2894125A1 (fr) * 2005-12-02 2007-06-08 Univ Technologie De Belfort Mo Appareil de detection du syndrome du canal carpien
US8496598B2 (en) 2008-02-05 2013-07-30 Technologia Apparatus for early diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and method and device for acquiring information on the skin sensitivity of a finger of a patient
US9610039B2 (en) 2008-07-17 2017-04-04 Prosenex, LLC Hand-held neuroscreening device
EP2312999A4 (fr) * 2008-07-17 2013-01-09 Electronic Products Accessories And Chemicals Llc Dispositif de diagnostic de neuropathies
CN103330546A (zh) * 2013-04-15 2013-10-02 北京工业大学 一种基于嵌入式的数字振动感觉阈值检测仪
EP3081151A1 (fr) * 2015-04-16 2016-10-19 Finn Gilling Christensen Dispositif et procédés permettant de diagnostiquer l'adhd et/ou l'autisme
WO2017034468A1 (fr) * 2015-08-25 2017-03-02 Lara Diagnostics Ab Dispositif et procédé de génération de stimuli sensoriels dans le but d'évaluer une neuropathie
WO2017091863A1 (fr) * 2015-12-04 2017-06-08 Newsouth Innovations Pty Limited Motif, procédé et système de stimuli permettant d'évoquer des motifs de suites de potentiels d'action dans des neurones sensoriels tactiles
EP3946016A4 (fr) * 2019-03-27 2022-12-14 Vibrosense Dynamics AB Appareil de mesure de perception vibrotactile et son procédé de préparation comprenant une mesure automatisée de la température
JP2022535532A (ja) * 2019-06-03 2022-08-09 スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー 触知覚障害及び運動制御異常の評価のためのシステム及び方法
JP7720786B2 (ja) 2019-06-03 2025-08-08 スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー 触知覚障害及び運動制御異常の評価のためのシステム及び方法
US20210345951A1 (en) * 2020-05-05 2021-11-11 University Of Utah Research Foundation Neuropathy Screening and Severity Instrument and System
WO2022179938A1 (fr) * 2021-02-26 2022-09-01 Vibrosense Dynamics Ab Biomarqueur de prédiction de la neuropathie induite par une chimiothérapie
JP2024507995A (ja) * 2021-02-26 2024-02-21 ヴィブロセンス ダイナミクス アー・ベー 化学療法誘発性神経障害の予測のためのバイオマーカー

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU4076200A (en) 2000-10-23
SA00210014B1 (ar) 2006-08-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6352516B1 (en) Fatigue monitoring device and method
WO2000059377A1 (fr) Appareil, systeme et methode de detection de neuropathies peripheriques
US5002065A (en) Vibratory screening or diagnostic systems
Mountcastle et al. Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand.
US5381805A (en) Cutaneous testing device for determining nervous system function
US7407484B2 (en) Physiological monitoring system for a computational device of a human subject
JP4319044B2 (ja) 入力信号を供給するためのシステム、該システムにて使用するための装置、およびコンピュータの入力装置
US5433211A (en) Method and system for identifying vibrotactile perception thresholds of nerve endings with inconsistent subject response rejection
Patel et al. A comparison of five tests for determining hand sensibility
JP2009240374A (ja) 皮膚特性測定装置および皮膚特性測定プログラム
Horch et al. An automated tactile tester for evaluation of cutaneous sensibility
Torres et al. Skin sensitivity assessment using smartphone haptic feedback
EP1227755B1 (fr) Systeme et procede permettant une analyse de la main quantifiee
JP5118777B1 (ja) 末梢神経検査装置
CN109303550A (zh) 用于脉诊仪的机械手指
US7159476B2 (en) Measuring device and method for reducing measuring errors
JP2019097666A (ja) 心拍測定装置、心拍測定方法及び心拍測定プログラム
KR20020065962A (ko) 건강진단센서를 지니는 마우스
US20040097838A1 (en) System and apparatus for providing quantified hand analysis
Torres et al. Cutaneous perception identification using smartphone haptic feedback
JP6172648B1 (ja) 情報伝達装置及びそれを用いた神経障害検査装置
Hsu et al. Digitizing abdominal palpation with a pressure measurement and positioning device
TW202347346A (zh) 即時手部動作偵測系統及其方法
US20210345951A1 (en) Neuropathy Screening and Severity Instrument and System
Buford Jr Clinical assessment, objectivity, and the ubiquitous laws of instrumentation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP